Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhmt
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 842 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60607, United States
Received 23 March 2005; received in revised form 11 March 2006
Available online 24 May 2006
Abstract
The sorption property data for dierent types of molecular sieves (synthetic zeolites) are presented in equation form. The variation of
the isosteric heat of sorption with water loading is derived using Othmers method. It is found that heat of sorption can be up to 50%
greater than the latent heat of vaporization. Heat of sorption data, together with equilibrium isotherms are curve tted and are incorporated into a numerical model of the nonlinear heat and mass transfer processes that occur in desiccant wheels. Using the numerical
model, the inuence of dierent assumptions for heat of sorption and equilibrium equation of molecular sieve on predicted optimum
performance of rotary dehumidier is evaluated.
2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Desiccant wheel; Sorption properties molecular sieves
1. Introduction
Rotary dehumidiers are used as industrial air dryers
and in commercial desiccant cooling systems. The dehumidication performance of rotary regenerators largely
depends on the sorption properties of porous matrix. Desiccant wheels, in which maximum moisture transfer is
important, have a sorbent matrix with large moisture capacity and small heat capacity. Natural zeolites, silica gels and
molecular sieves are some of dierent solid desiccants that
have been utilized in the design of thermally activated desiccant cooling systems.
A considerable amount of research [18] has been conducted in recent years with a purpose of modeling the
simultaneous heat and mass transfer processes that occur
in rotary dehumidiers and analyzing eects of dierent
parameters on their performance. In all of these studies,
*
M.N. Golubovic et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49 (2006) 28022809
2803
Nomenclature
cs ; cd ; cpda ; cwv ; clw ; cwr specic heat of support material,
desiccant, dry air, water vapor, liquid water,
wall (J/kg C)
f
mass fraction of desiccant material inside desiccant wheel
h
heat transfer coecient (W/m2 C)
L
channel length (m)
Le
Lewis number
NTU number of thermal transfer units
Pv, Psat vapor pressure of air streams, saturation pressure (Pa)
Ta, Tw, Treg temperature of air stream, channel wall,
regeneration (C)
t
time (s)
Wb, Wmax moisture content of the desiccant, maximum
moisture content of desiccant (kg H2O/kg desiccant)
u
velocity of air stream (m/s)
Ya, Yw humidity ratio of air stream, equilibrium humidity ratio of air at the surface between air stream
and desiccant material (kg H2O/kg desiccant)
z
space coordinate (m)
Greek symbols
d
half of the height of channel (m)
k
wall thickness (m)
qda, qw density of air stream, density of the wheel
(kg/m3)
Subscripts
ads
adsorption
des
desorption
pain, paout process air inlet, process air outlet
desiccant material. The process air stream, which is supplied to a conditioned space after being dehumidied and
cooled, passes through adsorption side of the desiccant
wheel. The regeneration air, heated by an external heat
source, passes through the regeneration side of desiccant
wheel and regenerates the desiccant. Within the desiccant
wheel, heat and mass transfer processes take place between
the two air streams and the desiccant wheel.
Applying mass and energy conservation laws to an innitesimal control volume within a channel of the desiccant
wheel, the following set of governing equations in non-dimensional form can be obtained (Golubovic and Worek [5]):
oW b
b3 Y a Y w
1
os
oT w
b5 Y a Y w T a T w
b4
2
os
oY a
b6 Y w Y a
3
of
oT a
b7 T w T a
4
of
5
dY w b1 dT w b2 dW b
oY w
;
oT w
b2
oY w
;
oW b
b3
cwr
;
fLecpda
1 f cs fcd fclw W b
;
cwr
Q
1
1
; b6 ; b 7
b5
Lecpda
Le
1 Y a ccpwv
b4
da
Y a s; 0 Y a ads const:;
inlet
T a s; 0 T a ads const:;
W b 0; f W des
b Dsdes ; NTUdes f;
T w 0; f T des
w Dsdes ; NTUdes f
9
Desorption side
inlet
Y a s; 0 Y a des const:;
inlet
T a s; 0 T a des const:;
W b 0; f W ads
b Dsads ; NTUads f;
T w 0; f T ads
w Dsads ; NTUads f
10
A nite-dierence method, Golubovic and Worek [5], is
used to solve this set of non-linear governing equations.
2804
M.N. Golubovic et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49 (2006) 28022809
DEWPOINT
DEWPOINT
HYGROMETER
HYGROMETER
DRY AIR
EXHAUST
SAMPLE
STEAM
12
In Eq. (12) SSE is the sum of the squares about the mean and
SSM is the sum of squared errors (residuals). A high r2 value,
greater than 0.95, is needed for good representation of the
data. In our case, all equations obtained by curve tting
the data obtained from Fig. 3 have an r2 greater than 0.99.
For 3A molecular sieve and 5A molecular sieve, the
ratio of heat of sorption and latent heat of evaporation
can be represented as
Q
a b W b c W 2b d W 3b e W 4b f W 5b
H fg
g W 6b h W 7b
13
M.N. Golubovic et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49 (2006) 28022809
15
16
W b = 0.02
Wb = 0.06
W b = 0.04
Wb = 0.08
W b = 0.06
14
W b = 0.08
W b = 0.1
Wb = 0.11
Wb = 0.13
W b = 0.12
10
2805
Wb = 0.15
W b = 0.14
12
Wb = 0.18
W b = 0.16
Wb = 0.2
W b = 0.18
W b = 0.2
Wb = 0.25
10
ln (Pv)
ln (Pv)
6
0
2
-5
0
9
ln (Psat)
10
11
-2
12
10
14
11
ln (Psat)
12
13
14
15
W b = 0.045
W b = 0.07
W b = 0.10
W b = 0.14
12
W b = 0.18
W b = 0.20
W b = 0.205
10
ln (Pv)
-2
7
10
11
ln (Psat)
12
13
14
Fig. 3. Ratio of equilibrium vapor pressure and saturation vapor pressure: (a) molecular sieve 3A; (b) molecular sieve 5A; (c) molecular sieve 13X.
Q
0:5
a b W b c W 2:5
b d W b e expW b
H fg
14
The coecients for Eqs. (13) and (14) are given in Table 1.
2806
M.N. Golubovic et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49 (2006) 28022809
1.6
RH
1.5
RH
1.3
a c T w e W b g T 2w i W 2b k T w W b
1 b T w d W b f T 2w h W 2b j T w W b
16
1.2
1.1
RH
Molecular Sieve 3A
Molecular Sieve 5A
Molecular Sieve 13X
1.0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Wb, kg H2O/kg desiccant material
0.25
Table 1
Heat of sorption equation coecients
Coecients
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
a b T w c T 2w d W b e W 2b f W 3b
1 g T w h T 2w i T 3w j W b
Molecular
sieve 5A
Eq. (13)
Molecular
sieve 13X
Eq. (14)
1.3993
17.9948
900.9695
18006
191104
1143703
3665594
4879165
1.674
17.633
599.92
9995.5695
85259.204
357042
573693
11.31
4.652
17.999
2.123
9.647
Equilibrium equations for three dierent types of molecular sieves are obtained by curve tting experimental data
obtained from [12,13]. For all curve ts r2 is greater than
0.99.
For 3A molecular sieve, for a range of equilibrium moisture uptake of 0.05 6 Wb 6 0.223, the following equation
was used to t the data:
a b T w c T 2w d T 3w e W b
1 f T w g W b h W 2b i W 3b
18
In this section, dierences in desiccant wheel performance using the equilibrium and heat of sorption equations presented in past literature for molecular sieves with
those using sorption property equations developed and
presented in this paper are evaluated. Adequacy of dierent
assumptions for equilibrium equation and the heat of sorption of molecular sieve is determined.
All results are obtained for an inlet process air temperature of 35 C, the inlet humidity ratios of both air streams
are 0.014 kg H2O/kg of dry air, the absolute pressure of
both air streams is 1 bar and the Lewis number is assumed
to be 1. The non-dimensional channel length, as determined by Eq. (7) is 18.5. This is a typical range of nondimensional lengths for desiccant wheels as presented by
Zheng et al. [6]. Also, the wheel is split equally between
the process and regeneration stream. This makes the nondimensional time period for adsorption and the nondimensional time period for regeneration to be the same
and are equal to half of the total non-dimensional time.
Table 2
Equilibrium equation coecients
Coecients
17
Molecular
sieve 3A
Eq. (13)
5. Equilibrium equation
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
15
1.4
Q/Hfg
a b T w c T 2w d W b e W 2b f W 3b
1 g T w h W b i W 2b j W 3b
Molecular sieve 3A
Molecular sieve 5A
Eq. (15)
Eq. (16)
Eq. (17)
0.1614
0.000316
3.62097 106
5.482
51.574
151.488
6.31744 106
13.684
62.721
96.099
0.00323
0.000837
0.000371
10.392
0.238
1.788 107
4.354 106
26.315
1.119
0.00607
391.64
0.00774
7.9499 106
6899.9545
39987.594
75979.53
0.00143
2.265
9.184
4.585
0.03
0.000203
1.642 106
1.935 109
0.363
5.111 106
11.48
44.184
56.944
M.N. Golubovic et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49 (2006) 28022809
Table 3
Comparison of optimum points for dierent sets of sorption data,
Treg = 110 C
2807
Table 4
Performance of desiccant wheel with molecular sieve 3A at non-optimum
rotational speeds, Treg = 110 C
Sorption
property
data
Total optimal
non-dimensional
time, sopt
Exit process
air temperature,
C
Y pain Y paout =
Y pain , %
Sorption
property
data
Total optimal
Exit process
Y pain Y paout =
non-dimensional air temperature, Y pain , %
time, sopt
C
Molecular
sieve 3A
Zheng et al. [6]
Jurinak et al. [9]
179
82.6
72.1
238
324
74.5
70.8
69.1
76.2
Molecular sieve 3A
Molecular sieve 3A
Molecular sieve 3A
179
238
324
72.1
67.7
54.7
Table 5
Comparison of optimum points for dierent sets of sorption data,
Treg = 170 C
RH W b =W max =1 50 1 W b =W max
82.6
78.2
69.4
20
The term R in Eq. (20) is constant and is called the separation factor. Many times the separation factor is set
equal to 0.01 for molecular sieves. Both Eqs. (19) and
(20) assume that the relative humidity of water vapor in
equilibrium with desiccant material does not depend on
temperature of desiccant material only on its water uptake.
In Table 3, with Treg = 110 C, the optimal performances of a desiccant wheel obtained using dierent sets
of sorption property data for molecular sieves are compared. It can be seen that predictions of optimum percentages of initial mass of water vapor removed from process
air stream in the desiccant wheel are dierent and strongly
depend on the set of sorption property data used. In the
case of desiccant wheel with molecular sieve type 3A, using
sorption property data for molecular sieve from literature
would lead to 34% lower or higher prediction of optimum
percentage of initial mass of water vapor removed from
process air stream pending on the set of sorption property
data used. Also, there is signicant dierence in optimal
non-dimensional time (i.e., the optimal rotational speed)
when dierent sets of heat of sorption and equilibrium
equation are used. This can lead to a signicant degradation in performance of a desiccant wheel that has type
3A molecular sieve if these wheels are operated at these
falsely obtained non-dimensional times, as shown in
Table 4.
At very high regeneration temperatures, Treg = 170 C,
the optimal dehumidication performances predicted using
Sorption
property
data
Total optimal
non-dimensional
time, sopt
Exit process
air temperature,
C
Y pain Y paout =
Y pain , %
Molecular
sieve 3A
Zheng et al. [6]
Jurinak et al. [9]
389
88.8
93.9
432
450
78.1
76.9
91.1
92.2
Table 6
Performance of desiccant wheel with molecular sieve 3A at non-optimum
rotational speeds, Treg = 170 C
Sorption
property
data
Total optimal
Exit process
Y pain Y paout =
non-dimensional air temperature, Y pain , %
time, sopt
C
Molecular sieve 3A
Molecular sieve 3A
Molecular sieve 3A
389
432
450
88.8
87.7
86.9
93.9
93.3
92.4
2808
M.N. Golubovic et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49 (2006) 28022809
sieve 3A temperature on its equilibrium and on the prediction of optimum desiccant wheel performance is signicant
and cannot be neglected.
Table 7
Inuence of dierent equilibrium isotherms on optimum desiccant wheel
performance, Treg = 110 C
Equilibrium
isotherm, C
Total optimal
non-dimensional
time, sopt
Exit process
air temperature,
C
Y pain Y paout =
Y pain , %
40
80
110
133
162
185
85.2
81.6
79.4
60.9
64.7
67.0
Table 8
Inuence of dierent equilibrium isotherms on optimum desiccant wheel
performance, Treg = 170 C
Equilibrium
isotherm, C
Total optimal
non-dimensional
time, sopt
Exit process
air temperature,
C
Y pain Y paout =
Y pain , %
110
140
170
343
361
375
87.6
85.7
84.0
88.5
89.3
90.0
In the literature two heat of sorption equations are suggested for molecular sieves. One assumes that heat of sorption is equal to the latent heat, Zheng et al. [6] and Jurinak
and Mitchell [9]. Another, Simonsen and Besant [2],
assumes the heat of sorption in form
"
k #
Wb
Q 1 hmax 1 1
21
H fg
W max
In the above equation hmax 3 and k is equal to either 2 or
5. It can be observed that all these equations for molecular
sieve heat of sorption are quite dierent. If heat of sorption
equations, from the literature, are used in computer code to
predict dehumidication performance of desiccant wheel
that has molecular sieve type 3A as desiccant material certain error in predicted performance is generated. This is
given in Tables 9 and 10. These tables are obtained by
using equilibrium equation for molecular sieve type 3A,
Eq. (15). Only, Table 9 is obtained for Treg = 110 C and
Table 10 for Treg = 170 C. From Tables 9 and 10 it can
Table 9
Inuence of dierent heat of sorption equations on optimum desiccant
wheel performance, Treg = 110 C
Heat of sorption
equation
Total optimal
Exit process
Y pain Y paout =
non-dimensional air temperature, Y pain , %
time, sopt
C
Simonsen and
Besant et al.
[2], k = 2
Simonsen and
Besant et al.
[2], k = 5
Jurinak et al. [9]
Molecular sieve
3A, Eq. (13)
172
85.9
66.4
170
88.8
59.4
186
179
79.4
82.6
75.3
72.1
Table 10
Inuence of dierent heat of sorption equations on optimum desiccant
wheel performance, Treg = 170 C
Heat of
sorption
equation
Total optimal
non-dimensional
time, sopt
Exit process
air temperature,
C
Y pain Y paout =
Y pain , %
Simonsen and
Besant et al.
[2], k = 2
Simonsen and
Besant et al.
[2], k = 5
Jurinak et al. [9]
Molecular sieve
3A, Eq. (13)
326
110.4
89.6
299
118.5
85.6
396
389
80.0
88.8
94.2
93.9
M.N. Golubovic et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49 (2006) 28022809
2809
References
[1] J.Y. San, Heat and mass transfer in a two-dimensional cross-ow
regenerator with a solid conduction eect, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
36 (1993) 633643.
[2] C.J. Simonson, R.W. Besant, Heat and moisture transfer in desiccant
coated rotary energy exchangers: Part II. Validation and sensitivity
studies, HVAC&R Res. 3 (1997) 351367.
[3] L.Z. Zhang, J.L. Niu, Performance comparisons of desiccant wheels
for air dehumidication and enthalpy recovery, Appl. Thermal Eng.
22 (2002) 13471367.
[4] X.J. Zhang, Y.J. Dai, R.Z. Wang, A simulation study of heat and
mass transfer in a honeycombed rotary desiccant dehumidier, Appl.
Thermal Eng. 23 (2003) 9891003.
[5] M.N. Golubovic, W.M. Worek, Inuence of elevated pressure on
sorption in desiccant wheels, Numer. Heat Transfer A 45 (9) (2004)
869887.
[6] W. Zheng, W.M. Worek, D. Novosel, Performance optimization of
rotary dehumidiers, J. Solar Energy Eng. 117 (1995) 4044.
[7] W. Zheng, W.M. Worek, D. Novosel, Eect of operating conditions
on optimal performance of rotary dehumidiers, J. Energy Resour.
Technol. 117 (1995) 6266.
[8] W. Zheng, W.M. Worek, D. Novosel, Control and optimization of
rotational speeds of rotary dehumidiers, ASHRAE Trans. 99 (1992)
825833.
[9] J.J. Jurinak, J.W. Mitchell, Eect of matrix properties on the
performance of a counterow rotary dehumidier, J. Heat Transfer
106 (1984) 638645.
[10] D.F. Othmer, Correlating vapor pressure and latent heat data, Ind.
Eng. Chem. 32 (1940) 841856.
[11] D.J. Close, P.J. Banks, Coupled equilibrium heat and single adsorbate transfer in uid through a porous medium II. Predictions for
silica gel air drier using characteristic charts, Chem. Eng. Sci. 27
(1972) 11571169.
[12] Davison molecular sieves, W.R. Grace & Co., Davison Chemical
Division, Technical Report, 1996.
[13] Union carbide molecular sieves water and air data sheets, Union
Carbide Co., Molecular sieve Department, Technical Report, XF-43.