Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Physical effort Laboratory, Florianopolis, Brazil; 2Physical Education
Department, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Brazil; and 3Health Sciences and Sports Center, State University of
Santa Catarina, Human Performance Research Laboratory, Florianopolis, Brazil
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
1666
the
TM
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
the
TM
METHODS
Experimental Approach to the Problem
| www.nsca.com
1667
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Peak velocity v
ns
10
30:6;
t
;
Peak velocity km$h21 v
180
where v is velocity of the last fully completed stage, t is time
(s) completed in a partially completed stage, and 180 is the
time (s) of a complete stage.
Each participant was verbally encouraged to deliver
maximum effort during the incremental test. Respiratory
gases were measured breath by breath during the incremental test using a precalibrated online metabolic system (Quark;
COSMED, Rome, Italy), and the data were reduced to 15second averages. The attainment of V_ O2max was defined
using the criteria proposed by Lacour et al. (26). The velocity at V_ O2max was considered the lowest speed where
V_ O2max occurred and was maintained for at least 1 minute.
Carminattis Test
1668
the
TM
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
the
TM
| www.nsca.com
TABLE 1. Variable performance (mean 6 SD) of both groups before and after the training period.*
T6:6
Treadmill test
Pretraining
V_ O2max (ml$kg21$min21)
vV_ O2max (km$h21)
Peak velocity (km$h21)
LT (km$h21)
HR-LT %HRmax
T-CAR test
Peak velocity (km$h21)
59.1
16.5
16.9
13.5
91.4
6
6
6
6
6
T12:12
Posttraining
2.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
1.6
60.0
17.4
17.9
14.3
89.7
16.8 6 0.6
6
6
6
6
6
Pretraining
3.5
0.6
0.8
0.8
1.7
53.7
16.2
16.6
12.8
88.8
18.1 6 0.5
6
6
6
6
6
Posttraining
5.6
1.0
0.9
0.6
5.4
55.8
17.0
17.3
13.8
89.3
16.6 6 0.7
6
6
6
6
6
2.8
0.3
0.7
0.8
3.1
17.5 6 0.7
_ O2max = maximal oxygen uptake; vV_ O2max = velocity at maximal oxygen uptake; LT = lactate threshold; HR = heart rate; T-CAR =
*V
Carminattis test.
Significantly different than pretraining (p , 0.01).
completed stage. Heart rate was monitored at 5-second intervals throughout all the tests with a commercially available
telemetry system (PolarS610; Polar Electro Oy). The CV for
this test was 1.4% (14).
To guarantee that both tests were performed on the same
conditions, both tests (pre- and posttraining) were conducted in an outdoor natural grass field with similar
environmental conditions (temperature, 24278 C; relative
humidity, 5565%). All tests were performed at the same
time of the day (i.e., 09.0011.00 hours) to avoid the influence of circadian rhythms.
RESULTS
During the 5 weeks of training, players underwent 10
conditioning training sessions corresponding to 400 minutes
of aerobic fitness training (9.5% of total preseason training
time). Figure 2 shows the HR responses to the fitness training sessions during the study period. It was observed that
both groups presented a significant difference with relation
to the %HRmax in the fifth and seventh training session (p #
0.05). Moreover, the group T6:6 presented a significant difference between sessions 1 and 5 (p # 0.05).
Statistical Analyses
TABLE 2. Effect sizes and absolute change (T6:6; T12:12) for all variables measured.*
T6:6
Treadmill test
V_ O2max (ml$kg21$min21)
vV_ O2max (km$h21)
PVTREAD (km$h21)
LT (km$h21)
HR-LT
T-CAR test
Peak velocity (km$h21)
(21.8 to 3.7)
(0.36 to 1.4)
(0.5 to 1.3)
(0.37 to 1.2)
(215.3 to 24.2)
T12:12
ES
0.3
1.5
1.3
1.1
21.8
Descriptor
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
2.4 Large
Absolute change
2.18
0.80
0.78
0.92
23.0
ES
(20.39 to 4.8)
0.5
(0.33 to 1.3)
1.0
(0.39 to 1.2)
0.9
(0.5 to 1.3)
1.4
(28.3 to 2.3) 20.6
Descriptor
Small
Large
Large
Large
Moderate
1.2 Large
_ O2max = maximal oxygen uptake; vV_ O2max = velocity at maximal oxygen uptake;
*ES = effect size; CI = confidence interval; V
PVTREAD = peak treadmill velocity; LT = lactate threshold; HR = heart rate; T-CAR = Carminattis test.
1669
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
DISCUSSION
The main purpose of this study was to compare the effects of
2 GAT training models prescribed from the PVT-CAR. The
results showed that both training modes (straight line and
shuttle run) similarly improved the LT, vV_ O2max, PVTREAD,
and the performance in T-CAR in soccer athletes. Thus, the
main hypothesis of this study was not confirmed because the
training model with direction change did not result in
greater improvements in the T-CAR performance.
A significant increase in V_ O2max values was not found.
However, it has been shown that because of the intermittent
nature of soccer, V_ O2max is not indicated as the best measure for verifying performance improvement in soccer players (18,22,24). The most significant changes found in this
study took place in PVT-CAR, PVTREAD, vV_ O2max, and LT.
These results provide further evidence that the PVT-CAR is an
important index for monitoring changes in a players ability
to perform intense intermittent exercise. Moreover, results
confirm the importance of choosing specific performance
tests for monitoring high-performance athletes.
In this study, the increase in PVT-CAR was 7.7% in T6:6
and 5.4% in T12:12. In terms of the distance covered, the
increases correspond to 18.7% in T6:6 and 14.1% in T12:12.
Recently, Buchheit and Rabbani (5) assumed that the Yo-Yo
Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 (Yo-YoIR1distance covered) and the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test (30-15IFTfinal
speed) would evaluate slightly different physical capacities.
However, their sensitivity to training (8-week intervention)
was almost certainly similar, despite differences in relative
changes of performance in each test. The improvement
observed in the Yo-Yo IR1 was 35% (distance), whereas
a 7% (velocity) change in 30-15IFT was reported. This demonstrates that depending on the variable analyzed (distance
or speed), the percentage increase may be different and that
T-CAR has similar sensitivity to other popular field tests
already established in the literature. This result has impor-
1670
the
TM
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
the
TM
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
In light of the findings of this study, PVT-CAR can be considered as a valid tool for aerobic fitness training prescription
in soccer. In this regard, this study provided evidence that
PVT-CAR-derived drills can be successfully implemented as
training either considering in-line or shuttle running drills.
Moreover, running bouts of 45 minutes with 3 minutes of
passive or active recovery may result successful in preparing
elite-level soccer players to cope with match high-intensity
demands using PVT-CAR.
Furthermore, studies are needed to investigate the
effects of other training models (different percentage of
the PVT-CAR) and should also be applied in different populations as soccer referees and female soccer players.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was carried out with the financial support of
Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement (CAPES).
| www.nsca.com
REFERENCES
1. Berg, A, Jokob, M, Lehmann, HH, Dickhuth, G, and Huber, J.
Current aspects of modern ergometry. Pneumologie 44: 213,
1990.
2. Buchheit, M. The 30-15 intermittent fitness test: Accuracy for
individualizing interval training of young intermittent sport players.
J Strength Cond Res 22: 365374, 2008.
3. Buchheit, M and Laursen, PB. High-intensity interval training,
solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: Cardiopulmonary
emphasis. Sports Med 43: 313338, 2013.
4. Buchheit, M and Laursen, PB. High-intensity interval training,
solutions to the programming puzzle: Part II: Anaerobic Energy,
Neuromuscular load and practical applications. Sports Med 43: 927
954, 2013.
5. Buchheit, M and Rabbani, A. 30-15 intermittent fitness test vs. Yo-Yo
intermittent recovery test level 1: Relationship and sensitivity to
training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 9: 522524, 2014.
6. Carminatti, LJ, Lima-Silva, AE, and De-Oliveira, FR. Aerobic fitness
in intermittent sports - Evidence of construct validity and results in
incremental test with pause. Braz J Exerc Physiol 3: 120, 2004.
7. Castagna, C, Impellizzeri, FM, Chauachi, A, and Manzi, V. Preseason variations in aerobic fitness and performance in elite standard
soccer players: A team-study. J Strength Cond Res 27: 29592965,
2013.
8. Cetolin, T, Carminatti, LJ, Fernandes da Silva, J, Foza, V, and
Guglielmo, LGA. Physiological responses during intermitent
exercise in peak velocity obtained in T-CAR test in professional
soccer athletes. Rev Min Ed Fis Special: 669675, 2013.
9. Cohen, J. Statistical Power for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
10. Dellal, A, Chamari, K, Pintus, A, Girard, O, Cotte, T, and Keller, D.
Heart rate responses during small-sided games and short
intermittent running training in elite soccer players: A comparative
study. J Strength Cond Res 22: 14491457, 2008.
11. Dellal, A, Keller, D, Carling, C, Chaouachi, A, Wong, P, and
Chamari, K. Physiologic effects of directional changes in
intermittent exercise in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 24: 3219
3226, 2010.
12. Dellal, A, Varliette, C, Owen, A, Chirico, EN, and Pialoux, V. Smallsided games versus interval training in amateur soccer players:
Effects on the aerobic capacity and the ability to perform
intermittent exercises with changes of direction. J Strength Cond Res
26: 27122720, 2012.
13. Dittrich, N, Fernandes da Silva, J, Castagna, C, De Lucas, RD, and
Guglielmo, LGA. Validity of Carminattis test to determine
physiological indices of aerobic power and capacity in soccer and
futsal players. J Strength Cond Res 25: 30993106, 2011.
14. Fernandes da Silva, J, Guglielmo, LGA, Carminatti, LJ, De
Oliveira, FR, Dittrich, N, and Paton, CD. Validity and reliability of
a new test (Carminattis test) for soccer players compared to
laboratory-based measures. J Sports Sci 29: 16211628, 2011.
15. Grossl, T, De Lucas, RD, Souza, KM, and Guglielmo, LGA.
Maximal lactate steady-state and anaerobic thresholds
from different methods in cyclists. Eur J Sport Sci 12: 161167, 2012.
16. Helgerud, J, Engen, LC, Wisloff, U, and Hoff, J. Aerobic endurance
training improves soccer performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:
19251931, 2001.
17. Helgerud, J, Rodas, G, Kemi, OJ, and Hoff, J. Strength and endurance
in elite football players. Int J Sports Med 32: 677682, 2011.
18. Hill-Haas, SV, Coutts, AJ, Rowsell, GJ, and Dawson, BT. Generic
versus small-sided game training in soccer. Int J Sports Med 30: 636
642, 2009.
19. Hill-Haas, SV, Dawson, B, Impellizzeri, FM, and Coutts, AJ.
Physiology of small-sided games training in football: A systematic
review. Sports Med 41: 199220, 2011.
VOLUME 29 | NUMBER 6 | JUNE 2015 |
1671
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
1672
the
TM
Copyright National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.