Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Figure No. 1: Flow chart showing the methodology of the current study.
Literature Review
The process of benchmarking is in the initiation stage in India. So, the Benchmarking process suggested
by MoUD has been reviewed thoroughly and identified the drawbacks of it. With the help of the HCM
(Highway Capacity Manual 2000) and grouping few other qualitative performance judging techniques, a
new SLBs have been developed, strengthening the Benchmarking process and making it more flexible.
Data Collection
Data collection for Benchmarking is shown in the Table No. 2 Below.
Table 2: Data Collection for Benchmarking
DATA
Public Transportation and IPT
Facilities
Pedestrian, Travel Speeds,
Intersection performances,
Parking and Pavement
Condition
Accident Data
Land Use Details
TYPE
Secondary
Secondary
Secondary
SP Office, Patiala
District Town Planning Department, Patiala and
Master Plan Patiala
Pollution Levels
Secondary
CPCB, Patiala
Primary
SOURCE
District Transport Officials (DTO), Patiala
By Conducting Trail runs & Surveys
IPT Facilities
The formulation for EBUs (Equivalent Bus Units) per 1000 population with the EFs (Equivalency
Factor) has been shown in the equation 1.
EBU/1000 population = EF*BUS+ EF*AUTO + EF*MAXI CAB + EF*CYCLE RICKSHAW/
Population in 1000s (Equation 1)
EBU = (1)* 21+ (0.1)* 3223 + (0.35)*14+ (0.05)*1214/408 = 1.002, CLOS = 3
Table 2: CLOS &OLOS Criteria for EBUs & Speed for IPT.
Overall
EBUs/1000
Speed (Kmph) Average Waiting
Time
(min)
Score
Population
>= 1.5
>= 20
<= 2
<=7
< 1.5 > 1
15 - 20
2-5
8-10
<1 > 0.75
10 - 15
5 - 10
11-15
<= 0.75
<10
> 10
16-20
Performance of Intersections
Signalized Intersections to Intersections ratio = 18/27 = 0.6667 CLOS = 3
Avg. Controlled Delay at Unsignalized Intersections = 43 Sec (HCM 2000) CLOS = 3
Avg. Controlled Delay at Signalized Intersections = 28 Sec (HCM 2000) CLOS = 2
CLOS and OLOS criteria for intersection performance have been shown in the Table 4.
Table 4: CLOS &OLOS Criteria for Intersection Performance.
CLOS or OLOS Ratio
Avg Controlled Delay at
Avg Controlled Delay
Unsignalized Xn
at Signalized Xn
1
<= 2
>= 1.5
>= 20
2
2-5
< 1.5 > 1
15 - 20
3
5 - 10
<1 > 0.75
10 - 15
4
> 10
<= 0.75
<10
Overall
Score
<=7
8-10
11-15
16-20
The PQI is calculated from the RQI and SR as shown in the equation 2 and the CLOS &
OLOS criteria has been shown in the Table 5. [3].
PQI = RQI *SR. (Equation 2)
Table 5: CLOS &OLOS Criteria for Pavement Quality Index.
CLOS or OLOS
RQI
SR
PQI Rating (Score)
1
0 1.5
0 1.5
=1
2
1.6 2.5
1.6 2.5
>1 <2
3
2.6 4.0
2.6 4.0
>2 <3
4
4.1 5.0
4.1 5.0
>= 4
Segment
No.
1.)
2.)
Conventional SLBs
Public Transportation
Facilities
Presence of Organized
Public Transport System
Extent of Availability of
Public Transport per 1000
population
Service Coverage (route
Kms / sq. km)
Formulation
Result CLOS
0.25
0.757
6.3
1.75
16.66
3.9
ft/Sec
Availability of Street
Lighting
Percentage of city covered
3.)
Availability of NMV
Facilities
Network covered (%)
Availability of Street
Lighting
Percentage of city covered
with Pedestrian Facilities
Extent of Coverage of
Foot Over Bridges
(Nos/Km)
CLOS1 + CLOS2 + CLOS3 + CLOS4 = 12 OLOS =3
IPT Facilities
Equivalent Bus Units
(EBUs)/1000 Population
Encroachment on NMV
roads by Vehicle Parking
NMT Facilities at
Interchanges (%)
Avg. time
taken to cross
an intersection
Compute LOS
2 based on lux
(B/A)*100 to
Compute LOS
3
(A/B)* to
Compute LOS
4
4.5
33.2
0.022
Compute LOS
1 based on
EBUs
(A/B) to
Compute LOS
2
1.002
0.359
Compute LOS
3 based on
Avg. waiting
time
(A/B) to
Compute LOS
4
Compute LOS
7.74
2.5
32.95
4.)
Level of Usage of
Intelligent Transport
System (ITS) facilities
Availability of Traffic
Surveillance System
Passenger Information
System (PIS)
Usage of Global Positioning
System
Signal Synchronization
Availability of Traffic
Surveillance System
(A/B)*100 to
Compute LOS
1
0.1
(A/B)*100 to
Compute LOS
4
33.03
--------------------------------------------------------Signal Synchronization
Compute LOS
1 based on
Avg. Speed
7.)
8.)
9
attained.
5 No. of Trails has to be taken along Compute LOS
each corridor and LOS has to be
2 based on
rated based on this average speed
Avg. Speed
attained.
CLOS1 + CLOS2 = 3 OLOS =2
Availability of Parking Spaces
Availability of Parking
Spaces
Availability of on street paid Availability of on street
Total no. of paid ECS has to be
public parking spaces
paid public parking spaces obtained within the city.
Difference in Maximum and Ratio to On street and Off A = ECS of off Street
Minimum Parking Fee in
Street Parking
B = ECS of on-Street
the City
CLOS1 + CLOS2 = 3 OLOS =2
Road Safety
Road Safety
Fatality rate per lakh
Fatality rate per lakh
A= Total number of fatalities
population
population
recorded within city limits in the
given calendar year
B= Population of the urban
agglomeration in that year
Fatality rate for pedestrian
Fatality rate for pedestrian A= Total number of pedestrian &
and NMT (%)
and NMT (%)
NMT fatalities recorded within city
limits in the given calendar year
B= Total number of fatalities
recorded in road accidents within
city limits in the given calendar year
CLOS1 + CLOS2 = 6 OLOS =3
Pollution Levels
Pollution Levels
18
Compute LOS
1 based on
paid parking
slots
(A/B) to
Compute LOS
2
12.75
(A*100,000/B)
to compute
LOS 1
27
(A/B)* 100 to
compute LOS
2
32.43
0.163
9.)
10
Annual Mean
Concentration Range
(g/m3)
Rate LOS
based on
annual mean
concentration
range
SO2 + NO2 + SPM +RSPM = CLOS1 + CLOS2 + CLOS3 + CLOS4 = 4+2+1+1 = 8 OLOS = 2
Integrated LanduseIntegrated Landuse-Transport System
Transport System
Population Density
Population Density
A = Area of the city in Hact
(B/A) to
B = Population of current year
compute LOS1
Mixed Land-use Zoning
Mixed Land-use Zoning
A = Total developed area
(B/A)*100 to
along the Transit Corridors
along the Major Corridors B = Total non residential area
compute LOS
2
Intensity of Development Intensity of Development Obtain the FSI of outer growth from Compute LOS
Citywide
Citywide
the master plan
3
Intensity of Development
Intensity of Development A = FSI along major corridors
(B/A) to
along Transit Corridors
along Major Corridors
B = FSI of the city
compute LOS
4
Road network Pattern and
Road network Pattern and Based on existing & proposed
Compute LOS
Completeness
Completeness
network recognize/identify major
based on the
roads and pattern along with their
road pattern
extent of completeness
completeness
Area under Roads Density
Area under Roads Density A= Measure overall developed area (B/A)*100 to
B = Measure overall area under
compute LOS
roads
6
% Network with Exclusive
% Network with
A= Total road network with ROW > (B/A)*100 to
ROW for transit (for > 1
Exclusive ROW > 30m
30m
compute LOS
million population as per
B = Total road network
6
2001 census)
CLOS1 + CLOS2 + CLOS3 + CLOS4 + CLOS5 + CLOS6 + CLOS7 = 21 OLOS =4
SO2+
NO2+
SPM+
RSPM
44.03
28
1.75
1.5
Some
what
clear
2.31
24.32
10.)
Financial Sustainability of
Public Transport By Bus
Extent of Non-fare Revenue
Staff /bus ratio
Operating Ratio
11.)
Performance of Intersections
Signalized Intersections to
Intersections ratio
(B/A)*100 to
compute LOS
6
Compute LOS
based on delay
Compute LOS
based on delay
Average Delay at
Compute by the delay study at
Signalized Intersections
Signalized intersections
Average Delay at
Compute by the delay study at
Unsignalized Intersections Unsignalized intersections
CLOS1 + CLOS2 + CLOS3 = 8 OLOS =3
Pavement Condition along the Major Corridors
Road Quality Index (RQI) Compute the average roughness
Compute LOS
along major corridors
by roughness
Surface Rating (SR)
Compute the average distress along Compute LOS
major corridors
by distress
RQI *SR = 3*2 = 2.44 OLOS = 3
0.667
28
43
Performance of Patiala city in the urban transportation sector is = 3+3+3+4+2+2+3+2+4+3+3 = 32/11 = 2.90
The overall Score Achieved by the Patiala city is 2.90 which indicate its poor performance in the Urban Transportation. The improvisation strategy
has to be developed by using the performance report card in which the present OLOS and the targeted OLOS will be presented, so that each and
every sector will be developed upto the desirable extent and if once the target is achieved, the cycle has to be repeated once again increasing the
desirable LOS.
11
S.
No
1
2
3
5
6
8
9
12
Table 6: Urban Transportation Performance Report Card for the city of Patiala.
OLOS
OLOS
Action Plan to achieve Target
Achieved Targeted
Public Transport facilities
3
2
Organized Public Transportation system has to be started
along the main routes of the city within next 3 years.
Pedestrian Infrastructure facilities
3
2
Installation of FOBs, Assigning Pedestrian Signal phase at
Major Intersections within next 2 & 3 years respectively.
IPT Facilities
3
2
Increasing its frequency in non peak times and making it
available in all routes which could not be covered by public
transport, by offering some tax relaxations & making the route
permit free within the next 2 years.
Level of usage of Integrated Transport System
4
2
Surveillance cameras have to be fixed at all major junctions
(ITS) facilities
within next 2 years.
All signals along the major corridor have to be Synchronized
with in next 2 years.
Travel speed along major corridors
2
1
Utmost care has to be taken such that the improvisation of PT
& IPT facilities must not make any negative impact on private
transport.
Availability of Parking facilities
2
1
Off street parking needs to be encouraged rather than On
street.
Multi level parking needs to be introduced at Dharampura
Bazaar within next 5 years.
Road Safety
3
2
Black spots within the city needs to be identified and
geometrically improved within next 5 years.
Road Safety Audit (RSA) has to be carried out throughout the
city and road marking & signages have to be improved within
the next 2 years.
Pollution levels
2
1
Pollution levels have to be dropped down by decreasing the
NO2 level in the city within next 5 years.
Land Use Transport Integration
4
2
Town planning department has to be made as one of the
Modified SLB
10
11
Performance of Intersections
Pavement Condition along the Major Corridors
3
3
1
2
Conclusions
The drawbacks of conventional SLB have been identified and modified by making the SLB process more stronger than before and making it
applicable for the large and medium sized cities. The process of SLB has to be made mandatory in all CMPs and CTTSs as it determines how
effectively and efficiently the present Transportation system is performing in the existing situation and in which sectors its lagging behind, so that
it can be improved easily with the future targeted LOS.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
13
Service level benchmarks for urban transport at a glance, released by MoUD, Urban mobility India conference 2009.
Singh k, Methods of assessing pedestrian level of service, Journal of Engineering Research and Studies, Vol. II, 2011, pp.116-124.
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/materials/pvmtmgmtdocs/Rating_Overview_State.pdf, last accessed August 31, 2011.
Inception Report, CMP Patiala submitted by M/s Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd to PMIDC, November 2010.