Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microchemical Journal
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / m i c r o c
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 4 August 2010
Received in revised form 12 November 2010
Accepted 6 February 2011
Available online 15 February 2011
Keywords:
Sediment
Sequential extraction
Microwave
Inductively coupled plasma mass
spectrometry
a b s t r a c t
In this work, a fast microwave assisted extraction procedure was developed and optimized for the heavy
metals (Cu, Ni, Cr, Pb and Cd) partitioning in the three-stage sequential extraction procedure proposed by
the European Standards, Measurements and Testing (SM&T) Program, formerly the Community Bureau of
Reference (BCR). The microwave oven procedure was optimized to obtain extraction efciencies similar to the
conventional BCR procedure, in less time, while using smaller volumes of reagents. In the optimization
process, three variables (extraction time, ramping time and microwave power) were considered as factors
and as a response the concentration of different metal ions in each individual BCR fraction. Interactions
between analytical factors and their optimized levels were investigated using a central composite design.
Extractable metals obtained by both comparable methodologies were measured by inductively coupled
plasma mass spectrometry. With the use of optimal microwave conditions, steps 13 of the sequential
extraction (including the hydrogen peroxide digestion in step 3) could be completed between 21 and 22 min.
Detection limits were between 1 and 18 ng l 1. The accuracy of the proposed method was checked with a
certied reference material (CRM) of Lake Sediment BCR 701. Values obtained were in accordance with those
reported for the certied material with only a few exceptions. Different origin sediments (river and marine)
were analyzed by both BCR and MW procedures, and the results obtained were comparable according to the
t-paired-test for a 95% condence level.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The accumulation of heavy metals in environmental samples such
as soils and sediments causes a potential risk to human health due to
the transfer of these elements in aquatic media, their uptake by plants
and their subsequent introduction into the food chain.
Over the last decade, more and more attention has been given to
the determination of species in which a metal is present, since the
toxicity, bioavailability, mobility and other properties depend on the
chemical association of the different components of the sample [1]. In
this sense, in addition to the total concentration of an element in a
sample, fractionation using sequential extraction schemes has been
proposed in order to characterize the chemical forms in which trace
metals are present in soils, sediments and sludges [2,3]. The
sequential extraction schemes proposed by Tessier [4], Campbell
et al. [5] and others [6], have to be mentioned in this context. The use
of fractionation procedures permits, for example, the determination of
how much of the total analyte is available for plants or is accessible to
235
Table 1
Operating conditions for ICP-MS system.
Instrument
Nebulizer gas ow rate (l min 1)
Auxiliary gas ow rate (l min 1)
Plasma gas ow rate (l min 1)
Autolens voltage (V)
Incident power (kW)
Analogical phase voltage (kV)
Digital phase voltage (kV)
Scanning mode
Dwell time (ms)
Number of replicates
Reaction gas, CH4 (ml min 1)
Element
Mass
Cr
Ni
Cu
Cd
Pb
52
60
6365
111
208
2.1. Instrumentation
2.3. Sample collection and preparation
The ICP-MS instrument used in all experiments was the Elan DRC-e
model purchased from PerkinElmer SCIEX Instruments, (Concord,
Canada) equipped with quartz torch, nickel sampler and skimmer
cones, a peristaltic pump (maintaining a 1 ml min 1 sample uptake
rate), a cross-ow type pneumatic nebulizer, a double pass Scott-type
spray chamber and an AS-90 autosampler. Instrumental performance
optimization, including the nebulizer gas ow rate, the ion lens
voltage and the alignment of the torch, was carried out following
the manufacturer's instructions. The nebulizer gas ow rate was
adjusted so that the CeO+/Ce+ ratio and Ba++/Ba+ were less than 3%.
Operating conditions are summarized in Table 1. A quantitative
analysis mode (TQM) was used for the data acquisition of the samples.
The scanning of each sample was repeated three times to gather
The river sediment samples were taken from the top 020 cm
depth and were collected in polyethylene containers from three
stations of the Guadalhorce river (Mlaga, Spain) by using a plastic
spoon and from three stations of the Bay of Mlaga. From each station,
610 samples of sediments (12 kg) were collected randomly. On
returning to the laboratory, the samples were spread on the plastic
trays in fume cupboards and allowed to dry at ambient temperature.
The river sediment samples were air-dried for 10 days in a controlled
clean environment while the marine sediments were dried at 105 C
for 24 h. The samples were then ground with an agate pestle and
mortar and sieved with a nylon of 75 m sieve, and homogenized.
The section under the sieve ( b 75 m) was used for the analysis by
236
Table 2
Reagents and experimental conditions.
Step
Fraction
1
2
Exchangeable
Reducible
Oxidizable
Reagent
Time
(h)
Volume of reagent
(ml)
Reagent
Heating time
(s)
Ramping time
(min)
MW power
(w)
Volume of reagent
(ml)
16
16
40
40
120
105
4.6
6.5
300
400
10
10
120
4.6
300
2/5
Y = 0 + j xj + jj xj + jk xj xk
The BCR sequential extraction method [9] was applied, in triplicate,
to 1 g of sample and to the certied reference material BCR 701. The
reagents and operating conditions employed are summarized in
Table 2. The extraction was carried out in 60 ml polyethylene tubes,
which were also used for centrifugation in order to minimize possible
losses of solid sample in the successive extraction steps of the
sequential procedure. After each extraction step, the supernatant
liquid was separated from the solid phase by centrifugation at
3000 rpm for 30 min, decanted into polyethylene containers and
stored at 4 C until analysis. The remaining solid residue was washed
with 20 ml of ultra-pure water by shaking for 15 min and the washings
were discarded after centrifugation.
2.5. Microwave sequential extraction
With the exception of the third fraction, the MW sequential
extraction was carried out using the same reagents as in the revised
BCR procedure, but replacing the magnetic shaking by MW heating
with the aim of reducing the operating time. In addition, in MW
extraction, lower amount of samples was used as compared to the BCR
sequential method. Extractant volumes were also decreased to
maintain a constant solid:solution ratio, since it is known that this
can affect the results obtained. The reagents and operating conditions
employed are summarized in Table 2. In the MW digestion procedure,
0.25 g of the powdered sieved grain size fraction was weighed directly
into each pre-cleaned MW vessel and the reagents for each three
extraction step were added. In the third step (oxidizable fraction)
2 ml of 30% H2O2 was added (for the digestion of the organic matter)
to the soil or sediment residue from the previous step plus 5 ml of
acetic acid extractant (pH of about 2). In all cases the vessels were
placed inside a rotor of the MW system, sealed, tightened using a
torque wrench and nally submitted to MW dissolution program.
After cooling, the supernatant liquid was separated from the solid
phase by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 30 min. The resulting solution
was evaporated near to dryness to eliminate unreacted reagents [17].
Then, 1 M HNO3 was used to transfer the extracted residue into a
25 ml polyethylene calibrated ask and the sample was diluted to
25 ml, thus the calibrants for the three steps were made in 1 M HNO3.
On the other hand, the remaining solid residue was washed with
10 ml of ultra-pure water by shaking for 15 min and the washings
were discarded after centrifugation. For each set of measures, at least
one blank containing the same amount of reagents as the samples was
also taken through each step. The digests were stored at 4 C until
analysis.
2.6. Optimization strategy
A rotatable uniform central composite design (CCD) [16] was used
to study the empirical relationship between three controlled factors.
237
Table 3
Factors and experimental domain levels.
Factor
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Low
High
Optimum
Low
High
Optimum
Low
High
Optimum
2.0
50
300
5.0
120
1200
4.5
120
300
2.0
50
300
10.0
140
1200
6.6
105
400
3.0
30
200
6.0
120
600
4.5
120
300
Fig. 1. Response surface obtained from CCD design. a) First and third extraction steps.
b) Second step.
238
Table 4
Determination of metals in BCR-701 Lake Sediment.
First step
Second step
Third step
Metals
Ni
Cd
Cr
Cu
Pb
This work
Certied values
Recovery (%)
This work
Certied values
Recovery (%)
This work
Certied values
Recovery (%)
15.4 0.7
15.4 0.9
100
24.7 0.2
26.6 1.3
93
15.6 0.9
15.3 0.9
102
7.01 0.36
7.34 0.35
96
3.5 0.5
3.77 0.28
93
0.279 0.004
0.27 0.06
103
2.17 0.19
2.26 0.16
96
39 1
45.7 2.0
85
123 2
143 7
86
49 6
49.3 1.7
99
128 5
124 3
103
50.1 0.1
55.2 4.0
91
3.3 1.1
3.18 0.21
103
125.9 0.1
126 3
100
7.65 0.07
9.3 2.0
82
Table 5
Validation of the method.
Samples
River sediment 1
River sediment 2
River sediment 3
Marine sediment 1
Marine sediment 2
Marine sediment 3
Step
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Ni
Cd
Cr
Cu
Pb
MW
BCR
MW
BCR
MW
BCR
MW
BCR
MW
BCR
4.0 0.7
18.2 2.3
13.2 2.2
3.9 1.2
8.8 0.4
12.3 1.2
17.8 0.3
11.2 0.5
7.0 1.3
4.2 0.3
14.4 1.3
17.0 1.1
4.6 0.1
13.8 1.4
13.6 0.2
4.4 1.2
14.6 0.5
20.3 0.1
4.8 1.1
20.1 1.9
12.2 1.4
5.1 1.3
8.9 2.4
12.0 0.4
12.1 3.3
9.0 1.9
8.2 1.3
3.7 0.2
15.4 2.3
17.1 2.1
3.8 1.3
11.0 2.1
16.3 3.2
4.0 0.3
12.1 2.0
21.1 2.3
0.04 0.03
0.020 0.006
0.005 0.001
0.03 0.01
0.04 0.01
0.007 0.002
0.044 0.001
0.053 0.004
0.015 0.002
0.04 0.01
0.020 0.003
0.008 0.001
0.041 0.004
0.031 0.001
0.031 0.001
0.039 0.001
0.07 0.09
0.073 0.002
0.04 0.01
0.020 0.002
0.010 0.006
0.04 0.01
0.02 0.01
0.010 0.002
0.05 0.01
0.07 0.01
0.03 0.01
0.04 0.01
0.020 0.006
0.010 0.007
0.05 0.01
0.02 0.01
0.03 0.01
0.05 0.02
0.06 0.02
0.07 0.02
0.10 0.02
1.7 0.6
7.2 1.2
0.08 0.01
0.6 0.2
6.3 0.1
0.04 0.01
0.4 0.1
4.9 0.4
0.08 0.02
1.5 0.1
13.2 0.4
0.38 0.02
1.86 0.05
10.7 0.1
0.17 0.01
3.1 0.1
12.87 0.08
0.10 0.01
1.0 0.7
4.9 1.3
0.10 0.06
0.80 0.02
5.0 0.2
0.03 0.01
0.4 0.1
4.7 0.8
0.10 0.08
2.0 0.3
10.0 2.9
0.6 0.2
31
91
0.16 0.05
4.0 1.2
10.2 1.1
0.4 0.1
2.7 0.6
2.1 0.4
0.5 0.1
3.5 0.5
9.1 1.3
0.45 0.04
3.2 0.1
14.8 2.3
0.4 0.2
5.0 0.3
7.0 0.3
0.94 0.03
7.2 0.2
6.95 0.03
0.24 0.01
7.0 0.4
9.43 0.06
0.6 0.1
2.0 0.5
2.9 0.6
0.8 0.2
3.0 0.3
10.1 1.8
0.6 0.3
3.1 0.1
15.2 1.9
0.4 0.1
4.0 1.3
6.9 1.2
1.1 0.1
5.2 1.1
9.2 2.9
0.4 0.2
6.3 0.8
11.2 2.3
0.34 0.01
1.8 0.6
0.4 0.1
0.3 0.1
2.2 0.5
0.50 0.01
0.3 0.1
6.4 0.3
4.2 1.3
0.5 0.1
8.5 0.4
2.48 0.03
0.564 0.004
11.7 1.2
1.91 0.01
0.76 0.01
15.7 0.2
2.4 0.01
0.20 0.04
1.9 0.1
0.40 0.06
0.20 0.01
2.2 0.4
0.4 0.04
0.10 0.05
7.2 1.4
4.0 0.4
0.40 0.04
9.1 1.9
2.4 0.1
0.41 0.05
12.8 0.9
2.3 0.8
0.8 0.2
16.3 1.1
2.3 0.6
239
[13] M.K. Jamali, T.G. Kazi, M.B. Arain, H.I. Alfridi, N. Jalbani, G.A. Kandhro, A.Q. Shah, J.A.
Baig, Speciation of heavy metals in untreated sewage sludge by using microwave
assisted sequential extraction procedure, J. Hazard. Mater. 163 (2009) 11571164.
[14] B. Prez Cid, I. Lavilla, C. Bendicho, Application of microwave extraction for
partitioning of heavy metals in sewage sludge, Anal. Chim. Acta 378 (1999)
201210.
[15] G. Sado, M.C. Sado, Les Plans d'Expriences, Afnor Techniques, Paris, 1991, p. 100.
[16] J. Gouply, Plans d'Expriences pour Surfaces de Rsponse, Dunod, Paris, 1991,
p. 253.
[17] M.B. Arain, T.G. Kazi, M.K. Jamali, H.I. Alfridi, R.A. Sarfraz, J.A. Baig, G.A. Kandhro,
M.A. Memo, Time saving modied BCR sequential extraction procedure for the
fraction of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in sediment samples of polluted lake, J. Hazard.
Mater. 160 (2008) 235239.
[18] Statgraphics Plus Version 6.0 Reference Manual, Manugistics, Rockville, MD, 1992.
[19] C.M. Davidson, A.L. Duncan, D. Littlejohn, A.M. Ure, L.M. Garden, A critical
evaluation of the three-stage BCR sequential extraction procedure to assess the
potential mobility and toxicity of heavy metals in industrially-contaminated land,
Anal. Chim. Acta 363 (1998) 4555.