Mohammed Alamgir Assistant Professor of Marketing University of Chittagong Chitt
agong 4331, Bangladesh & Mohammad Shamsuddoha Assistant Professor of Marketing University of Chittagong Chittagong 4331, Bangladesh Service Quality Dimensions: A Conceptual Analysis Abstract The study aims at exa mining various literatures on service quality dimensions to adapt perfect strate gy and policy for service oriented organizations, especially in the banking sect or. It also aspires to identify the relative importance of service quality dimen sions analysis as one of the most important factors which influence the organiza tion directly. The future of any organization has its own roots to go forward an d it can be shaped by identical changes by the top level management regarding se rvice issues. It will not even become what most top level management thinks rath er it must analyse all the related development and generate a hybrid service qua lity dimension model s that the organizations are able to give their level best to their target o customers. In this way, organizations will be more systematic, innovative and rich in insight. This study, fully focused on service quality is sues, will help to understand service dimensions issues for an organization. Key words: Service, Service quality, Service dimensions Introduction Service quality is determined by the differences between customers' expectations of service pro vider's performance and their evaluation of the services they received. In this way, the association between service quality and customer satisfaction has emerg ed as a topic of significant and strategic concern (e.g. Bolton and Drew, 1991; Cronin and Taylor, 1992). In general, research in this area suggests that servic e quality is an important indicator of customer satisfaction. Service quality is also attractive to retail banks as a competitive differentiator (Newman, 2001). On the other hand, researchers also focused that there has been considerable de bate regarding the basic dimensions of service quality as well as the measuremen t of these dimensions. A number of researchers have provided lists of quality de terminants. Johnston (1997, p 111) also mentioned: “Probably, the best-known det erminants of service quality come from two groups of researchers, Parasuraman an d colleagues in the USA and Johnston and colleagues in the UK”. In this paper, t he researchers tried to identify various service quality dimensions proposed and practised by various researchers and professionals. At the same time, the resea rchers also wanted 1 to develop a conceptual framework by considering the most common quality dimensi ons in this regard. Objectives of the Study The principal objective is to evalua te literature on service quality which has been developed by different researche rs that is applicable to different kinds of organizations, especially in the ban king sector. To accomplish this, the study has covered the following specific ob jectives: 1. To evaluate different dimensions of service quality 2. To find out possible approach to examine quality service dimensions 3. To propose an instrum ent concerning dimensions of service quality Scope and Methodologies of the Stud y The study has covered various literatures on service, service quality and serv ice dimensions based on UK and other developed countries like the European Union countries. A Library research method (Archive) has been used in this study. Dif ferent books, journals, periodicals and online papers ha ve been observed by the researchers to find out different issues in service quality dimensions in this connection. Mostly secondary data has been compiled in this study and this data has been collected from focused countries’ literatures, textbooks, e-journals, g overnment publications etc. This study tried to focus service industry in genera l and banking services in particular. Moreover, some of the banks (operating in Bangladesh) have been observed by the researchers to have idea about the practic e related to service quality dimensions. Service Quality In the service quality literature, it is generally agreed that different people understand different th ings regarding the service quality as a multidimensional notion. Bolton and Drew (1991); and Oliver (1980) defined customers service quality as the difference between the actual service performance and their expectations. Similar to Bolton and Drew (1991); and Oliver (1980), Parasuraman et al. (1988: p19) characterise d perceived service quality as "the degree and direction of discrepancy between customers perceptions and expectations". The services marketing literature reve als that "service quality has been variously defined as focusing on meeting need s and requirements, and how well the service delivered matches customers expect ations" (Lewis 1993: p 22). They also proposed that "service quality is a global 2 consumer judgement or attitude, relating to service and results from comparisons by consumers expectations of service with their perception of actual service pe rformance" (Lewis, 1991; p 53). Service quality is the distinction between consu mers expectations for service performance and their perceptions of the service received. Zeithaml and Bitner (1996, p 45) defined perceived service quality as the judgement of a customer about the overall excellence or superiority of a pro duct or service. They also defined service quality as, "the delivery of excellen t or superior service relative to customer expectations". The study in banking s ector by Parasuraman et al. (1985, p44) stated that "customers perceptions of q uality are influenced by various gaps which lead to service quality shortfalls a nd, in particular, that the quality perceived in a service is a function of the gap between customers desires/expectations and their perceptions of the service that is actually received". Supporting this definition, Lewis (1991) proposed t hat service quality is a measure of how well the service delivered meets custome rs expectations of a product and service. For instance, the service provided by the local commercial bank (Government and private) and multinational banks in B angladesh can be compared. From the observation, it has been found that the gap (perceived and delivered services) is very high in case of state-owned banks (su ch as Sonali, Krishi Bank etc.) and some of the private commercial banks ( such as United Commercial Bank, Agrani, Rupali etc.) compare to the multinational ban ks (HSBC, CITI NA, SCB) in Bangladesh. According to the above definitions of ser vice quality, it may therefore be concluded that service quality is an assessmen t of the customers about how well the service fulfils their expectations in term s of perceptions of the service. Dimensions of Service Quality This section aims to identify the various dimensions of service quality proposed by different aut hors in the services marketing literature and to discuss these dimensions in rel ation to the banking sector. 3 According to (Lewis, 1993) the dimensions of service quality focus on "interacti ons between a service firm and its customers and typically relate to: @ Technica l dimensions, i.e. the outcome of the service process to include systems and tec hnology; for example; Link ATM machine of Dutch Bangla Bank Limited, Credit card s of Standard Chartered Bank, online and Internet banking of Bank Asia, EBBL etc . @ Functional dimensions, i.e. the way the service is delivered to include inte r-personal interactions between employees and customers, appearance and personal ity of service personnel and approachability of personnel; for example; customer service department of HSBC, service complain department (rarely found in Bangla deshi banks; very common in developed countries) and trade services department o f HSBC, SCB etc., @ The corporate image dimensions which is the result of how cu stomers perceive the firm, and can be expected to be built up mainly by the tech nical and functional quality of its services, and will ultimately affect service perceptions ; for example; HIV/AIDS assistance program, Smile Brighter program, Support to Acid and Dowry victims, by DBBL. All of the above dimensions of serv ice quality are applicable in other service oriented sectors along with banking sector. Most of the services (withdrawal of cash, preparing statements etc.) of a bank are now technology oriented. The quality of banking services also depends on the inter-personal interactions (functional dimensions) between the customer s and the employees of the bank. For example, when a cashier addresses a custome r in a familiar way, speaks to him/her in a professional manner and his/her tran saction is completed as efficiently and quickly as possible, the customer is gen erally satisfied with the behaviour and services offered by the cashier. Service quality of a bank sometimes depends on the corporate image dimensions, such as, reputation as an employer, approach to social responsibility issues etc. Parasu raman et al. (1985) identified ten dimensions of service quality (e.g. credibili ty, security, accessibility, communication, understanding the consumer, tangible s, reliability, responsiveness, competence and courtesy). In subsequent research , however, Parasuraman et al. (1988) consolidated the above ten dimensions into five broad dimensions that are shown along with their definitions in Table 1. 4 Table 1: Five broad dimensions of service quality Dimension Tangibles Reliabilit y Definition Appearance of physical facilities, equipment, personnel and written materials. Ability to perform the promised service dependably and accurately. Responsiveness Willingness to help customers and provide prompt service. Assuran ce Employees’ knowledge and courtesy and their ability to inspire trust and conf idence. Empathy Caring, easy access, good communication, customer understanding and individualised attention given to cus tomers. Source: Adapted from Zeithaml et al. (1990) All of the above dimensions are found relevant to banking sector ( Zeithaml and Bitner, 1996). For example, Credibility is important to demonstrate the good reputation of the bank. Security is another important matter to articu late the safety for the customers to use the bank s ATMs anytime and to protect the credit card against unauthorised use. Empathy or accessibility is another ke y related factor that enables customers to deal with their banks more easily (Le vesque and McDougall, 1996). Communication is also most important in the banking sector. When customers complaint, the bank manger should be interested to liste n to the customer regarding their complaints through proper communication channe ls. Understanding the customer is important for banks to make the efforts to kno w customers and their needs. Tangibility is another important dimension for bank s. For instance, "Customers make inferences about the service quality on the bas is of tangibles of the bank (the buildings, the physical layout etc.), that surr ound the service environment because these can have a significant impact on cust omers affective responses" (Jamal and Naser, 2002). Besides, the customers are happy when they can understand their bank statements easily. Reliability is also important in banking sector. When a bank officer, for instance, says he/she wil l call the customer back in 10 minutes to solve the problem, he/she should do so accordingly. Responsiveness is an important dimension for bank to resolve the p roblem of the customers quickly and which is rare in our banking sector. Compete nce or assurance is also an important factor to transact through the bank teller process without making any mistake. Courtesy is important for bank employees to have a pleasant behaviour and to show the politeness consistently when answerin g the various questions of their 5 customers. Sureshchandar et al. (2002) suggested that service quality is based e ssentially on five dimensions/factors critical from the customers’ point of view . These dimensions/factors are: @ Core service or service product; @ Human element of service delivery; @ System atisation of service delivery - non-human element; @ Servicscape s (the environm ent in which the service is delivered and where the firm and the customer interact, that means tangible commodities that facilitate performance or communication of the service; www.busfac32.cob.calpoly.edu); and @ Social responsibility. Sureshchandar et al. (2002) also suggested that these five dimensions are releva nt to the banking sector. For example, banks now have diversified range of produ ct and services which includes deposits; ATM facilities, telephonic banking, loa ns for purchases of cars, houses etc., retirement accounts, issuing traveller s cheques, safe deposit lockers, etc. and service quality depends on how well thes e services/facilities delivered by the banks to their customers. The human eleme nt of service delivery in the banking sector includes providing banking services as promised by the bank staff, effectiveness of bank staff s skill and ability for actions whenever a critical incident takes place, willingness of bank staff to help customers and the readiness to respond to customers requests, making cu stomers feel safe and secure in their transactions, giving caring and individual attention to bank customers by having the customers best interests at heart et c. The systematisation of service delivery (non-human element) in the banking se ctor includes having a highly standardised and simplified delivery process so th at banking services are delivered within a minimum time without any hassles or e xcessive bureaucracy, enhancement of technological capability (e.g. telephone ba nking, internet banking, wireless banking service, etc.) to provide superior qua lity service to the customers more effectively, degree to which the banking proc edures and processes are perfectly fool-proof, adequate and necessary bank perso nnel and facilities for good customer service etc. 6 Tangibles of service (servicescapes) in the banking sector includes the ambient conditions such as temperature, ventilation, noise and odour prevailing in the b ank s premises, extent of the physical layout of equipment and other furnishings being comfortable for customers to interact with bank staff, visually appealing signs, symbols, advertisement boards, pamphlets and other artefacts in the bank , bank staff who have a neat and professional appearance, visually appealing mat erials and facilities associated with the service etc. Social responsibility of the bank includes equal treatment stemming from the belief that every customer s hould be treated alike, having branch locations in most places convenient to all sections (e.g. villages, down town areas, etc.), a social responsibility charac terised by "deserving service" to people belonging to all strata of society, a s ense of public responsibility among bank staff (in terms of being punctual, regu lar, sincere and without going on strikes), extent to which the bank leads as a corporate citizen, and the level to which it promotes ethical conduct in everyth ing it does etc. Avkiran (1999) identified the following four discriminating fac tors of service quality in the banking sector. @ Staff Conduct: Responsiveness, civilised conduct and presentation of branch st aff that will project a professional image to the customers. @ Credibility: Maintaining bank staff-customer trust by rectifying mistakes, and keeping customers informed. @ Communication: Fulfilling banking needs to customers by successfully communica ting financial advice and serving notices timely. @ Access to Teller Services: The adequacy of number of branch staff serving cust omers throughout business hours and during peak hours. According to the above discussi on of various dimensions of service quality, it is found that different authors have proposed different dimensions of service quality. For having a quick look, all dimensions of service quality proposed by different authors mentioned above are shown in the following table. 7 Table 2: Possible approach to analysing quality dimensions Dimensions Tangibles Specific elements Staff s neat dress Staff s professional appearance Buildings Leaflets Credibility Timely service Accuracy of records Dependability Staff con duct Willingness of staff to help customers To provide prompt of service Staff s knowledge Politeness of staff Staff s courtesy Trustworthiness and confidence Good communication Individual attention Customer understanding Access to teller services L* × ü × × × × × × ü ü ü × ü × × × × × × ? Z† ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü × × ? S‡ ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü × ü ü × ü ü A§ × ü × × ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü Reliability Responsiveness Assurance Empathy Social Good service at a reasonable cost responsibility Staff s sense of public responsibility Source: Lewis (1993), Parasuraman et al. (1988), Sureshchandar e t al. (2002), Avkiran (1999). Table 2 indicates that all authors mentioned above do not have the same opinion with every aforementioned specific element of quality dimensions. However, the a uthors of this study propose that all of the specific elements of quality dimens ions may be used to measure service quality in the banking sector because most o f them were used in banking sector previously to measure service quality (Zeitha ml and Bitner, 1996; Levesque and McDougall, 1996; Avkiran, 1999; Sureshchandar et al., 2002; Jamal and Naser, 2002). In accordance with Table 2, almost all of the specific elements of service quality of reliability, responsiveness, assuran ce, empathy, and social respons ibility dimensions are included in the four dime nsions of BANKSERV, an instrument that exclusively deals with the perceived serv ice * † L stands for Lewis (1993). Z stands for Parasuraman et al. (1988). ‡ S stands fo r Sureshchandar et al. (2002). § A stands for Avkiran (1999). 8 quality within the special context of banks, proposed by Avkiran (1999) except f or the specific elements of tangibles dimens ion. The author, therefore, propose s that the BANKSERV instrument proposed by Avkiran (1999) should be modified by adding tangibles dimension because it is now considered as an important dimensio n in every country all over the world to measure service quality in all sectors and thus this instrument will be an appropriate battery to measure the service q uality in the banking sector. As a result, the author proposes five dimensions i n the BANKSERV instrument, which are listed in Table 3 and are used in this stud y to measure service quality in the banking sector because some problems are ide ntified with SERVQUAL to measure service quality. The main problem with SERVQUAL is to compare perceived performance with expectations in separate items (22-exp ectations items and 22perceptions items), whereas the BANKSERV instrument captur es the similar comparison of perceived performance with expectations in a batter y of single statements (Avkiran, 1999). Table 3: dimensions of service quality i n the BANKSERV instrument Dimensions Tangibles Specific elements Appearance of p hysical facilities, availability of leaflets, bank employees neat dress and pro fessional appearance etc. Staff Conduct Politeness, greeting, willingness to hel p customers, providing prompt service, to apologise for any mistake, expression of genuine concern always for any mistake etc. Credibility Rectifying mistake pr operly, maintaining security for customers dealings, keeping customers informed always about the matters of concern to them etc. Communication To communicate su ccessfully to provide financial advice and timely service such as helping custom ers learn how to keep down their banking costs, having adequate knowledge of ban k s services and products, telling customers about the actual time to perform th e services etc. Access to Teller Adequacy of number of open tellers and staff du ring the busy Services hours of the day. Source: Adapted from Avkiran, N. K. (19 99) Considering the above literature the following model can be developed which will encompass the most common quality instruments as well as widely used qualit y dimensions. 9 Table-4: Proposed service quality dimensions and their instruments. Dimensions R eliability Quality instruments Credibility Timely service Accuracy of records De pendability Assurance Staff s knowledge Courtesy and Politeness of staff Trustw orthiness and confidence Tangibles Location Staff s professional appearance Emp athy Individual attention Customer understanding Responsiveness Staff conduct Wi llingness of staff to help customers To provide prompt of service Social respons ibility Good service at a reasonable cost Source: Compiled from secondary litera ture and observation Concluding Remarks This paper focused on service quality is sues in the developed countries which can be a guideline for our fastest growing service industry, especially banking sector, regarding assurance of service qua lity, customer perception evaluation, minimizing the customer expectations gap, social responsibilities and other related issues. As service industry is growing very quickly, they have to give careful attention regarding discussed service q uality dimensions in order to minimize the expectation-perception gap as well as to ensure better and quality service. This paper analyses different literatures on service quality dimensions of Lewis (1993), Parasuraman et al. (1988), Sures hchandar et al. (2002) and Avkiran (1999). It is clear that those literatures ar e based on some elements which are directly related to the service quality issue s and these issues are equivalently important for an organization for sustainabl e growth of their profitability. In this paper the researchers also propose a mo del of service quality dimensions along with their instruments on the basis of t he earlier research work, which can be followed by Bangladeshi service sectors, especially in banking to promote true quality service. Moreover, this model can be guideline for the top level managers to understand the different aspects of s ervice qua lity dimensions so that they can be able to choose the right dimensio ns and instruments to offer competitive service for the sake of holding sustaina ble growth and profitability of the organizations. 10 References 1. Avkiran, N.K. (1999), “Quality customer service demands human contact”, Inter national Journal of Bank Marketing, 17, 2, 61-71. 2. Bolton, R.N. and Drew, J.H. (1991), “A longitudinal analysis of the impact of service changes on customer a ttitudes”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 55, pp. 1-9. 3. Cronin, J.J. and Taylor, S .A., (1992), "Measuring service quality: a re-examination and extension", Journa l of Marketing, 56, 55-68. 4. Jamal, A. and Naser, K. (2002), “Customer satisfac tion and retail banking: an assessment of some of the key antecedents of custome r satisfaction in retail banking”, The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 20, 4, 146-160. 5. Johnston, R. (1997), “Identifying the critical determinants o f service quality in retail banking: importance and effect”, International Journ al of Bank Marketing, 15, 4, 111-116 6. Levesque, T. and McDougall, G.H.G., (199 6), “ Determinants of customer satisfaction in retail banking”, International Jo urnal of Bank Marketing, 14, 7, 12-20. 7. Lewis, B.R. (1991), “Service quality: an international comparison of bank customers’ expectations and perceptions”, Jo urnal of Marketing Management, Vol. 7, pp. 47-62. 8. Lewis, B. (1993), “Service quality: recent developments in financia l services”, International Journal of B ank Marketing, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 19-25. 9. Newman, K. (2001), “ Interrogating S ERVQUAL: a critical assessment of service quality measurement in a high street r etail bank”, The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19, 3, 126-139 10. Oli ver, R.L. (1980), ``A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of sat isfaction decisions’’, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XVII, November, pp. 4 60-9. 11. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1985), " conceptual m odel of service A quality and its implications for future research", Journal of Marketing, 49, 41-50. 12. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1988) , ``SERVQUAL: a multiple -item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of servi ce quality’’, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64 No. 1, Spring, pp. 12-40. 13. Suresh chandar, G.S., Rajendran, C. and Anantharaman, R.N. (2002), “The relationship be tween service quality and customer satisfaction- a factor specific approach”, Jo urnal of services Marketing, 16, 4, 363-379. 14. Zeithaml, V.A. and Bitner, M.J. (1996), Services Marketing, international edition, McGraw Hill, New York, NY an d London. 15. Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A. and Berry, L.L. (1990), Delivering quality service: Balancing Customer perceptions and expectations, Free Press, N ew York, NY. 16. http://www.bankasia -bd.com/ 17. http://www.ebl-bd.com/. 18. ht tp://www.dbbl.com.bd/Social_Responsibility/Donation/donation_1.htm 19. http://ww w.hsbc.com.bd/bd/ 20. www.busfac32.cob.calpoly.edu 11