Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jung-Heon Nam
Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Changshin College, Masan-si, Gyunsangnam-do, South Korea
Dae-Hwan Park
Department of Hotel Management, Youngsan University, Haeundae-gu, Busan, South Korea, and
Kyung Ah Lee
Food Service and Distribution Division, Samsung Everland Co., Kusung-eup, Yongin-si, Gyunggi-do, South Korea
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyze the structural relationship between empowerment, service training, service reward, job attitudes
such as job satisfaction and organizational commitment, and customer-oriented prosocial behavior of employees.
Design/methodology/approach The research question is examined using a sample of Korean hotel employees. Structural equation analysis is used
to test various research hypotheses and examine the extent to which job satisfaction and organizational commitment mediate the effect of
empowerment, service training, and service reward on customer-oriented prosocial behavior.
Findings First, the greater the job satisfaction, the greater is the role-prescribed customer service of employees. Second, the greater the job
satisfaction, the greater is the organizational commitment. Third, empowerment has a significant effect on organizational commitment and extra-role
customer service. Fourth, service training has a significant effect on job satisfaction, but it has a negatively direct effect on organizational commitment.
Fifth, service reward has a significant influence on job satisfaction and organizational commitment.
Practical implications Based on these empirical findings, employee management should be shifted from a transactional to a relationship-building
orientation the former being short-term goal-oriented and the latter long-term. Additionally, service organizations should evaluate employee lifetime
value (ELV) as well as customer lifetime value (CLV).
Research limitations/implications There is a need to extend the results to a diverse range of service industries.
Originality/value This research explains that empowerment, service training, and service reward contribute to the evaluation of organizational
commitment through the medium of job satisfaction.
Keywords Employee behaviour, Empowerment, Training, Job satisfaction, Customer service management, Hotel and catering industry, South Korea
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
The delivery of service occurs in the interaction between
service providers and customers (the service encounter).
During the service encounter, customers estimate the service
quality provided by service providers, and compare their
perceived service qualities with their estimated ones. If
customers perceptions of the service are beyond what is
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
www.emeraldinsight.com/0887-6045.htm
251
Literature review
Prosocial behavior
Prosocial behavior refers to the helpful behavior of service
providers directed toward an organization or other individuals
252
Service training
Service training is considered as one of general management
strategies to cope with the high volume of customer requests
and market needs (Harel and Tzafrir, 1999). Service training
provides a medium for the communication of new
organizational strategies, new values, new tools, and new
ways of performing work (Kassicieh and Yourstone, 1998).
Therefore, an effective training program has a significant
effect on customer satisfaction (Gonzales et al., 1999).
Schlesinger and Heskett (1991) assert that leading service
firms should invest in people as much as in machines,
especially providing for service skill training in order to
enhance service providers abilities which meet complex
customers service requests. According to Benoy (1996), a
well-trained and dedicated staff can enhance a customers
service experience and contribute significantly to an
organizations reputation for responsive service. But high
employee turnover, inexperienced new employees, and low
Empowerment
Empowerment refers to a situation in which managers give
service providers the discretion to make day-to-day decisions
about job-related activities (Bowen and Lawler, 1992, p. 31).
Conger and Kanungo (1988, p. 476) suggested that
empowerment affects the initiation and persistence of
employees task behavior. Empowered service providers can
253
Service reward
Connecting service providers rewards with service
performance is a key component of service quality (Berry
et al., 1994). Hartline and Ferrell (1996) argue that the
service-oriented behavior of service providers is influenced by
clear, specific reward programs (e.g. promotion and bonus).
Rewarding and recognizing excellent service are highly related
to customer satisfaction with service quality (Johnson, 1996),
and were also associated with customer satisfaction and
service passion (Schneider and Bowen, 1993).
In addition, Lawler (2000) highlighted the importance of
reward in that reward strategy plays a key role in gaining
competition and winning in markets. Similarly, Gomez-Mejia
and Wellbourne (1988) state that an advanced reward system
can be a potential source of obtaining competition in markets,
and retaining excellent employees. Rewards associated with
excellence increase service providers productivity and reduce
absenteeism (Kaufman, 1992).
Research hypotheses
Relationship between job satisfaction and prosocial behavior
Job satisfaction has a positive effect on the customer orientation
of service providers (Hoffman and Ingram, 1992). Dienhart
et al. (1992) suggest that increasing the employees job
satisfaction can assist in improving their overall service
orientation. In addition, service oriented employees are
described as attentive, pleasant, and responsive to customers
needs, which leads to better customer service. Several
researchers also found that job satisfaction affects these
service providers prosocial behavior (MacKenzie et al., 1998;
Netemeyer et al., 1997; Smith et al., 1983).
Therefore, we propose the following hypotheses:
H1. Service providers job satisfaction is positively
associated with their role-prescribed customer service.
H2. Service providers job satisfaction is positively
associated with their extra-role customer service.
Measures
A seven-point scoring format ranging from strongly disagree
to strongly agree was used to measure all variables.
To measure customer-contact employees customer-oriented
prosocial behavior for customers needs, the items were
adopted from the Bettencourt and Browns (1997) study.
Ten items assessed the perceptions of employees for roleprescribed customer service and extra-role customer service.
Job satisfaction was measured by using the five items developed
by Brayfield and Rothe (1951). Organizational commitment
was measured with the five-item scale used by Jaworski and
Kohli (1993). The empowerment scale consisted of two items
drawn from the Lytle et al.s (1998) study. The service training
scale consisted of three items drawn from the Lytle et al.s
(1998) study that assessed the extent of the education and
training of service providers designed to improve customer
services. The service reward scale consisted of two items drawn
from the Lytle et al.s (1998) study (see Table I).
Results
Reliability assessment
To purify the measurement scale for each construct, the
reliability test was used. Overall, one item from the extra-role
customer service construct was eliminated. The reliabilities of
the final measures were then assessed.
The coefficient alphas of seven constructs are above 0.6,
which was considered to be acceptable for the study (see
Table I).
Measurement results
The overall measurement quality was assessed using
confirmatory factor analysis (Anderson and Gerbing, 1992).
Although measurement quality is sometimes assessed factor
by factor, each multiple-item indicator was considered
simultaneously to provide for the fullest test of convergent
and discriminant validity. Initial analyses suggested that eight
items with low factor loadings (below 0.50) should be
dropped from further analyses (see Table II).
All loadings exceed 0.5, and each indicator t-value exceeds
4.8 (p , 0:001). The x2 fit statistics shows 184.23 with 114
degrees of freedom (p , 0:001). The root mean squared error
for approximation (RMSEA) is 0.05, the comparative fit
index (CFI) is 0.97, the adjusted goodness-of-fit index
(AGFI) is 0.87, and the parsimony normed fit index (PNFI)
is 0.69. The x2/df ratio is 1.62. All statistics support the
overall measurement quality given a large sample and the
number of indicators (Anderson and Gerbing, 1992).
Furthermore, the evidence of discriminant validity exists
when the proportion of variance extracted in each construct
exceeds the square of the F coefficients representing its
correlation with other factors (Fornell and Larcker, 1981). As
shown in Table III, one pair of scales with the highest
correlation between them is service training and service
reward (F 0:75, F2 0:56). The variance extracted
estimates are 0.70 and 0.78, respectively, indicating
adequate discriminant validity. Although one may also be
concerned about the discriminant validity of the job
Methodology
Samples and data collection
The sample of the study consisted of tourism hotels located in
South Korea. We contacted chief executive officers of 301
hotels (43 for five-star hotels; 63 for four-star hotels; 195 for
three-star hotels) to introduce the purpose of the study and
encourage participation. A total of 265 hotels agreed to
participate in the study. To collect the data from customer
contact employees, we selected food and beverage and
housekeeping departments as a sampling frame. We
distributed two copies of the questionnaire to each of 265
contacted hotels (a total of 530). A total of 219 of 530 employee
questionnaires distributed (41.3 percent response rate) were
returned. However, due to incomplete answers, two
questionnaires were eliminated, providing a final sample of 217.
According to the hotel grade, the five-star deluxe hotel was
55 (25.3 percent), the four-star deluxe hotel was 56 (25.8
percent), and the three-star hotel was 106 (48.9 percent). The
demographic characteristics of the samples indicated that 113
respondents were male (52.1 percent) and 104 were female
(47.9 percent). With regard to departments, Food and
Beverage was 101 (46.5 percent) and Housekeeping was 116
255
Empowerment
0.83
EMP1 Our hotel service providers can make important customer
decision without seeking management approval
EMP2 Our hotel service providers have responsibility and authority to
act independently in order to provide excellent service
Training
0.86
TRA1 Every employee in our hotel receives personal skills training
that enhances his/her ability to deliver high quality service
TRA2 We spend much time and effort in simulated training activities
that help us provide higher levels of service when actually
encountering the customer
TRA3 During training sessions, our hotel works through exercises to
identify and improve attitudes toward customers
Reward
0.80
REW1 Our hotel management provides excellent incentives and
rewards at all levels for service quality, not just productivity
REW2 Our hotel noticeably celebrates that excellent service are used
to measure the extent to which organization and management
provide reward for service quality of service providers
Job satisfaction
0.81
JS1
There are some conditions concerning my job that could be
improved
JS2
My job is like a hobby to me
JS3
My job is usually interesting enough to keep me from getting
bored
JS4
It seems that service providers are more interested in their jobs
JS5
I consider my job rather unpleasant
Organizational commitment
0.90
OC1 I feel as though my future is intimately linked to that of the
hotel
OC2 I would be happy to make personal sacrifices if it were
important for the hotels well-being
OC3 The bonds between the hotel and its employees are strong
OC4 I am proud to work for the hotel
OC5 I often go above and beyond the call of duty to ensure the
hotels well-being
Role-prescribed customer service
0.76
RPCS1 I perform all those tasks for customers that are required of him/
her
RPCS2 I meet formal performance requirements when serving
customers
RPCS3 I fulfill responsibilities to customers as specified in the job
description
RPCS4 I adequately complete all expected customer-service behaviors
RPCS5 I help customers with those things which are required of him/
her
Table II Standardized measurement coefficients and t-values resulting from confirmatory factor analysis
Empowerment
EMP1
EMP2
TRA1
TRA2
TRA3
REW1
REW2
JS3
JS4
JS5
OC1
OC3
OC4
OC5
RPCS1
RPCS2
ERCS2
ERCS3
Variance
Extracted
0.78
0.96
Service
training
Service reward
Job
satisfaction
Organizational
commitment
Roleprescribed
Extra-role
(12.62)
(16.40)
0.83
0.90
0.92
(14.83)
(16.78)
(16.84)
0.81
0.87
(13.90)
(15.06)
0.70
0.81
0.72
(11.06)
(13.23)
(11.35)
0.62
0.75
0.93
0.83
(9.84)
(12.59)
(17.68)
(14.67)
0.90
0.81
(14.40)
(12.76)
0.74
0.53
0.77
0.70
0.78
0.56
0.55
0.73
(6.31)
(4.81)
0.49
Notes: x 184:23, df 114 (p , 0:001), CFI 0:97, PNFI 0:69, RMSEA 0:05
Empowerment (EMP)
Training (TRA)
Reward (REW)
Job satisfaction (JS)
Organizational commitment (OC)
Role-prescribed customer service (RPCS)
Extra-role customer service (ERCS)
EMP
TRA
1.00
0.52
0.58
0.36
0.48
0.35
0.30
1.00
0.75
0.51
0.56
0.43
0.27
REW
1.00
0.50
0.56
0.43
0.27
JS
1.00
0.63
0.56
0.18
OC
1.00
0.45
0.21
RPCS
Mean
(S.D.)
1.00
0.19
4.57
4.95
4.88
5.14
5.08
5.41
4.37
(1.12)
(1.09)
(1.11)
(0.98)
(1.05)
(1.02)
(1.16)
Indirect effects
Empowerment does not have a significantly indirect effect on
both role-prescribed customer service (0.05, n.s.) and extrarole customer service (0.05, n.s.). Furthermore, training does
not have a significantly indirect effect on both role-prescribed
customer service (0.22, n.s.) and extra-role customer service
(0.05, n.s.). In contrast, reward has an indirect, positive effect
on both role-prescribed customer service (0.24, p , 0:05) and
extra-role customer service (0.19, p , 0:05).
257
And, the CFI for the rival model (0.97) is slightly superior to the
proposed model (0.96). Also, the GFI and AGFI of the rival
model (0.91 and 0.87, respectively) are slightly higher than
those of the proposed rival model (0.90 and 0.86, respectively).
This finding indicates that adding a path from empowerment,
service training, and service reward to prosocial behavior does
improve its fit significantly. Therefore, we can conclude that the
rival model is the best of the two models.
Proposed model
Direct effects
Empowerment ! Job satisfaction
Empowerment ! Organizational commitment
Empowerment ! Role-prescribed customer service
Empowerment ! Extra-role customer service
Service training ! Job satisfaction
Service training ! Organizational commitment
Service training ! Role-prescribed customer service
Service training ! Extra-role customer service
Service reward ! Job satisfaction
Service reward ! Organizational commitment
Service reward ! Role-prescribed customer service
Service reward ! Extra-role customer service
Job satisfaction ! Organizational commitment
Job satisfaction ! Role-prescribed customer service
Job satisfaction ! Extra-role customer service
Organizational commitment ! Role-prescribed customer service
Organizational commitment ! Extra-role customer service
Indirect effects
Empowerment ! Organizational commitment
Empowerment ! Role-prescribed customer service
Empowerment ! Extra-role customer service
Service training ! Organizational commitment
Service training ! Role-prescribed customer service
Service training ! Extra-role customer service
Service reward ! Organizational commitment
Service reward ! Role-prescribed customer service
Service reward ! Extra-role customer service
Job satisfaction ! Extra-role customer service
2
x
d.f.
P
2
R
JS
OC
RPCS
ERCS
0.05
0.19
(0.54)
(2.66)*
0.30
0.57
(1.82)***
(4.43)*
0.37
2 0.30
(1.90)***
(2 1.88)***
0.51
0.61
0.18
0.07
0.18
(5.92)*
(4.39)*
(1.13)
(0.58)
(1.18)
0.05
0.05
(0.75)
(1.30)
0.22
0.05
(1.62)
(0.53)
0.24
0.19
0.28
(2.02)**
(2.13)**
(1.16)
207.00
121
0.000
0.47
0.75
0.45
0.12
Rival model
0.03
0.20
0.07
0.30
0.34
2 0.28
0.18
2 0.16
0.33
0.55
2 0.14
0.52
0.52
0.56
0.18
0.07
2 0.31
(0.31)
(2.77)*
(0.69)
(2.34)*
(1.71)***
(21.81)***
(0.84)
(20.61)
(1.96)***
(4.29)*
(20.72)
(2.12)**
(6.09)*
(3.63)*
(1.02)
(0.40)
(21.53)
0.02
0.03
2 0.06
0.18
0.18
0.10
0.17
0.24
2 0.17
2 0.16
(0.31)
(0.48)
(21.30)
(1.57)
(1.39)
(0.99)
(2.00)**
(1.72)***
(21.35)
(21.46)
183.49
115
0.000
0.45
0.75
0.46
0.25
References
Agus, A., Krishman, S.K. and Kadir, S.L.S.A. (2000), The
structural impact of total quality management on financial
performance relative to competitors through customer
satisfaction: a study of Malaysian manufacturing
companies, Total Quality Management, Vol. 11 Nos 4-6,
pp. 808-19.
Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1992), Assumptions and
comparative strengths of the two-step approach,
Sociological Methods and Research, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 321-33.
Babin, B.J. and Boles, J.S. (1998), Employee behavior in a
service environment: a model and test of potential
differences between men and women, Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 62 No. 2, pp. 77-91.
Bartel, A.P. (1994), Productivity gains from the
implementation of employee training programs, Industrial
Relations, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 411-25.
Bateson, J.E.G. (1995), Managing Services Marketing, Dryden
Press, Fort Worth, TX.
Bendapudi, N. and Leone, R.P. (2001), How to lose your
star performer without losing customers, too, Harvard
Business Review, Vol. 79 No. 10, pp. 104-10.
Benoy, J.W. (1996), Internal marketing builds service
quality, Journal of Health Care Marketing, Vol. 16 No. 1,
pp. 54-9.
Berry, L.L., Parasuraman, A. and Zeithaml, V.A. (1994),
Improving service quality in America: lessons learned,
Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 32-52.
Bettencourt, L.A. and Brown, S.W. (1997), Contact
employees: relationships among workplace fairness, job
satisfaction and prosocial service behaviors, Journal of
Retailing, Vol. 73 No. 1, pp. 39-61.
Bitner, M.J., Booms, B.H. and Mohr, L.A. (1994), Critical
service encounters: the employees viewpoint, Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 4, pp. 95-106.
Bitner, M.J., Booms, B.H. and Tetreault, M.S. (1990), The
service encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable
incidents, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 71-84.
Bowen, D.E. and Lawler, E.E. III (1992), The
empowerment of service workers: what, why, how, and
when, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 31-9.
Brayfield, A.H. and Rothe, H.F. (1951), An index of job
satisfaction, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 35,
October, pp. 307-11.
Brief, A.P. and Motowidlo, S.J. (1986), Prosocial
organizational behaviors, Academy of Management Review,
Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 710-25.
Further reading
Kenny, D.A. (1979), Correlation and Causality, John Wiley &
Sons, New York, NY.
Lawler, E.E. and Jenkins, G.D. (1992), Strategic reward
systems, in Dunnette, D.M. and Hough, M.L. (Eds),
Handbook of Industrial Organizational Psychology, Vol. 3,
Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 1009-55.
Corresponding author
Yong-Ki Lee can be contacted at: yongki2@sejong.ac.kr
263
264