Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pelagio
JD 2-2
After a scrutiny of the evidence extant on record, the Court finds that this case calls for
the application of the grandfather rule since, as ruled by the POA and affirmed by the OP, doubt
prevails and persists in the corporate ownership of petitioners. Also, as found by the CA, doubt
is present in the 60-40 Filipino equity ownership of petitioners Narra, McArthur and Tesoro,
since their common investor, the 100% Canadian corporationMBMI, funded them. Obviously,
the instant case presents a situation which exhibits a scheme employed by stockholders to
circumvent the law, creating a cloud of doubt in the Courts mind. To determine, therefore, the
actual participation, direct or indirect, of MBMI, the grandfather rule must be used.
In ending, as the court held in the Narra v Redmont case, the "control test" is still the
prevailing mode of determining whether or not a corporation is a Filipino corporation, within the
ambit of Sec. 2, Art. II of the 1987 Constitution, entitled to undertake the exploration,
development and utilization of the natural resources of the Philippines.