Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.
53 / Monday, March 21, 2005 / Notices
minimis. We have made no changes to
Stelco’s margin for these final results.
Final Results of Review
As a result of this review, we find that duties.
the following weighted-average
dumping margins exist for the period
August 1, 2002, through July 31, 2003:
Manufacturer/exporter
Dofasco Inc., Sorevco, Inc., Do
Sol Galva Ltd. .......................
Stelco Inc. .................................
Duty Assessment and Cash Deposit
Requirements
The Department shall determine, and
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. The Department
will issue appropriate appraisement
instructions directly to CBP within 15
days of publication of the final results
of review. Furthermore, the following
deposit rates will be effective with
respect to all shipments of certain
corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat
products from Canada entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results, as provided for
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
For Dofasco, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate indicated above; (2) for
Steloco, the rate is de minimis and
therefore, there is no cash deposit
requirement; (3) for previously reviewed
or investigated companies not listed
above, the cash deposit rate will be the
company-specific rate established for
the most recent period; (4) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the less-than-
fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the subject merchandise; and (5) for all
other producers and/or exporters of this Review: Small Diameter Circular
merchandise, the cash deposit rate shall Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel
be the ‘‘all other’’ rate established in the Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe
LTFV investigation, which is 18.71
percent. The deposit rate, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
publication of the final results of the
next administrative review.
Notification of Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under § 351.402(f)(2) of
the Department’s regulations to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
VerDate jul<14>2003 18:36 Mar 18, 2005 Jkt 205001
13459
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
Margin disposition of proprietary information
(percent)
disclosed under APO as explained in
the administrative order itself. Timely
2.31 written notification of the return/
0.02 destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and notice
are in accordance with sections
751(a)(1)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 14, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix—List of Issues
1. Surface Type Characteristics for Model
Match
2. New Assessment Policy for Resellers
3. Treatment of Channel ‘‘2’’ Sales
4. Calculation of CEP Profit
5. Sales Subject to Review
6. Margin Program Adjustments
7. Normal Value Currency Conversion
8. Identification of DJG in Customs
Instructions
9. Inclusion of Importer in Liquidation
Instructions
[FR Doc. E5–1218 Filed 3–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–351–826]
Notice of Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
From Brazil
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 11, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published the final results
of its administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on small
diameter circular seamless carbon and
alloy steel standard, line and pressure
pipe from Brazil for the period August
1, 2002, through July 31, 2003. See
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Small
PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
Diameter Circular Seamless Carbon and
Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure
Pipe from Brazil, 70 FR 7243 (February
11, 2005) (‘‘Final Results’’). We are
amending our Final Results to correct
ceratin ministerial errors alleged by the
respondent V&M do Brasil, S.A.
(‘‘VMB’’) pursuant to section 751(h) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’).
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 21, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Helen M. Kramer or Patrick Edwards,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, at
(202) 482–0405 or (202) 482–8029,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Amendment of Final Results
On February 11, 2005, the Department
published the Final Results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on small
diameter circular seamless carbon and
alloy steel standard, line and pressure
pipe (‘‘seamless line pipe’’) from Brazil.
See Final Results. In accordance with
section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.224(c)(2), on February 14, 2005,
both United States Steel Corporation
(‘‘petitioner’’) and VMB timely filed
allegations that the Department made
ministerial errors in the final results. On
February 22, 2005, we received
comments from both the petitioner and
respondent, rebutting each party’s
alleged ministerial errors. In accordance
with section 751(h) of the Act, we have
determined that certain ministerial
errors were made in our Final Results
margin calculations. For a detailed
discussion of the ministerial error
allegations, rebuttals and the
Department’s analysis, see
Memorandum to Richard O. Weible,
Director, through Abdelali Elouaradia,
Program Manager, from Helen M.
Kramer and Patrick S. Edwards, Case
Analysts, regarding ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Small
Diameter Circular Carbon and Alloy
Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe
from Brazil; Alleged Ministerial Errors
in the Final Results,’’ dated March 14,
2005, which is on file in the Central
Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), room B–099 of
the main Department building.
In accordance with section 751(h) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are
amending the final results of the
antidumping duty administrative review
of seamless line pipe from Brazil to
correct these ministerial errors.
21MRN1
 13460 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 53 / Monday, March 21, 2005 / Notices
The revised weighted-average DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
dumping margin for the period August
1, 2002, through July 31, 2003, are listed International Trade Administration
below: [C–533–842]
Revised
Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Manufacturer/exporter margin
Determination: Bottle-Grade
(percent)
Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)
V&M do Brasil, S.A ....................... 7.96 Resin From India
AGENCY: Import Administration,
Cash Deposit Rates International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
The following antidumping duty
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
deposits will be required on all (the Department) has reached a final
shipments of seamless line pipe determination that countervailable
products from Brazil entered, or subsidies are being provided to
withdrawn from warehouse, for producers and exporters of Bottle-Grade
consumption, effective on or after the (BG) Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)
publication date of the amended final Resin from India. For information on the
results of this administrative review, as estimated countervailable subsidy rates,
provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: please see the ‘‘Final Determination’’
(1) The cash deposit rate for the section of this notice.
reviewed company will be the rate EFFECTIVE DATE: March 21, 2005.
listed above; (2) for previously reviewed FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
or investigated companies not listed Douglas Kirby or Addilyn Chams-
above, the cash deposit rate will Eddine, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6,
continue to be the company-specific rate Import Administration, U.S. Department
published for the most recent period; (3) of Commerce, Room 7866, 14th Street
if the exporter is not a firm covered in and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
this review, the previous review, or the Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
original investigation, but the 482–3782 or (202) 482–0648,
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate respectively.
will be the rate established for the most
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) if neither the Case History
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
On August 30, 2004 the Department
covered in this or any previous reviews, published the Notice of Preliminary
the cash deposit rate will be 124.94 Affirmative Countervailing Duty
percent, the ‘‘All Others’’ rate Determination and Alignment with
established in the less-than-fair-value Final Antidumping Duty Determination:
investigation. These cash deposit Bottle-Grade Polyethylene
requirements shall remain in effect until Terephthalate (PET) Resin from India,
publication of the final results of the 69 FR 52866 (August 30, 2004)
next administrative review. (Preliminary Determination). Since the
issuance of the Preliminary
Assessment Rates Determination, the following events
In accordance with section 19 CFR have occurred. Between September 9
356.8(a), the Department will issue and November 17, 2004, the Department
appropriate assessment instructions issued supplemental questionnaires to
directly to U.S. Customs and Border each of the respondent parties and all
Protection (CBP) on or after 41 days parties submitted timely responses to
following the publication of these the questionnaires. On September 29,
2004, the United States PET Resin
amended final results of review to effect
Producers Coalition (Petitioner)
the Final Results and these amended
requested a hearing pursuant to 19 CFR
final results.
351.310(c) and the Department’s
We are issuing and publishing these Preliminary Determination.
amended final results and notice in From December 2 through December
accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 17, 2004, the Department conducted
751(h) and 771(i) of the Act. verification of the questionnaire
Dated: March 14, 2005. responses provided by the Government
of India (GOI) and the four respondent
Joseph A. Spetrini,
parties: Reliance Industries, Ltd.
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import (Reliance), Futura Polyesters, Ltd.
Administration. (Futura), South Asia Pertrochem Ltd.
[FR Doc. E5–1223 Filed 3–18–05; 8:45 am] (SAPL), and Elque Polyesters Ltd.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P (Elque). The Department issued the GOI
VerDate jul<14>2003 18:36 Mar 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703
and the Reliance Industries Ltd.
(Reliance) verification reports on
January 25, 2005. See Memoranda to the
File, Countervailing Duty Investigation
of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)
Resin from India: Verification of the
Government of India’s (GOI)
Questionnaire Responses (GOI
Verification Report); and Countervailing
Duty Investigation of Polyethylene
Terephthalate (PET) Resin from India:
Verification of Reliance Industries Ltd.
(Reliance Verification Report). The
Department issued the Elque, Futura,
and SAPL verification reports on
January 26, 2004. See Memoranda to the
File, Countervailing Duty Investigation
of PET Resin from India: Verification of
Elque Ltd. (Elque Verification Report);
Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Resin
from India: Verification of Futura
Polyesters Ltd. (Futura Verification
Report); and Countervailing Duty
Investigation of PET Resin from India:
Verification of South Asia Petrochem
Ltd. (SAPL Verification Report). In
addition, on February 14, 2005, the
Department issued a memorandum
containing our preliminary analysis of
the Export Oriented Unit (EOU)
programs which we had noted in the
Preliminary Determination were
programs for which additional
information was needed. See
Memoranda to the File from Sean Carey,
Acting Program Manager, through Dana
S. Mermelstein, Acting Director, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 6, to Barbara E.
Tillman, Acting Deputy Assistant
Secretary, for Import Administration,
Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Resin
from India: Preliminary Analysis of the
Export Oriented Unit (EOU) Program on
Duty Drawback on Furnace Oil Procured
from Domestic Oil Companies Program
and Purchases of Materials and Other
Inputs Free of Central Excise Duty (EOU
Program Memorandum).
On February 4, 2005, case briefs were
filed by the Petitioner, the GOI,
Reliance, and SAPL. On February 9,
2005, the Petitioner, Reliance, and SAPL
filed rebuttal briefs. Neither Futura nor
Elque filed case or rebuttal briefs. On
February 11, 2005, the Petitioner
withdrew its request for a hearing.
The Department also allowed parties
a separate opportunity to file comments
and rebuttal comments on our EOU
Program Memorandum. On February 17,
2005, such comments were filed by the
Petitioner, the GOI, Reliance and SAPL.
On February 22, 2005, the Petitioner
submitted rebuttal comments. Also, on
February 17, 2005, Reliance requested
that the Department proceed with a
hearing. On February 18, and February
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1