TO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet (Oct-16-2015 1:33 pm Case Number: CGC-15-548487 Filing Date: Oct-16-2015 1:24 Filed by: ARLENE RAMOS Juke Box: 001 Image: 05118472 COMPLAINT AMANDA LAMB VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET AL 001005118472 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Sumy UMMONS 3 FOR COURT USE ORLY (CIPACION JUDICIAL) -cxou doa tcenins cee! NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: (AVISO AL DEMANDADO): Uber: Technologies, Inc.; Rasier, LLC; Rasier-CA, LLC; Steven Ernest Elias; and Does One through Fifty, Inclusive YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: (LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE): Amanda Lamb NOTICE! You have bean sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days, Read the Information below. ‘You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and lagal papers are sorved on you ts fle written response at this court and have 8 copy ‘served on the plant. A letter or phone cal will nt protect you. Your wien response rust be in proper legal form Ifyou want the cout to hear your ‘sas. There may be 8 court form that you can use for your response. You can find these cout forms and more information atthe California Courts ‘nine Sot-Help Center (wonw.courtnfo.ce.gow/sethelp), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you. if yu cannot pay the fing fee, ask the court clerk for 2 fee waiver fom. Hf you do not fle your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without futher waming from the cour. ‘There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attomay ght ewey. Ifyou do not know an atfomey, you may want to call an atomey ‘oferal ervce. if you cannot afford an attomey, you may be eligble fr free legal services from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locate those nonproft groups et the California Legal Services Web sks (wiw.lawhelpoalforia.org), tho Calfrnia Courts Online Solf-Help Canter (ww:courtinfe.cagovfseirep),or by contacting your local court or county bar association, NOTE: The court hae a statutory Hen for waved fees and ‘Sosts on sny settlement or ablation award of $10,000 or more in a cli case. The cours len must be pald before the oourt wl disse tho case, JAVISO! Lo han demandedo. io responde dentro de 30 dlas, la corte puede decid en su conta sin escuchar su versién. Lea la informacion & | continuacin. ‘rene 30 DIAS DE CALENDARIO después de que fs enirequen esta ctecin y papeles legalas para prosentar una respuesta por eecrto en esta corte y hacer que se entregue una copia al demandante. Une carta © una Hamad telfénica nolo protegen. Su respuesta por esato ene que estar en formato logalcorecto si desea que procesen su caso en a cote. Es posible que haya un formulero quo usted pueda usar para su respuesta. Puede encontrar asios formularios de la corte y més informacién en ol Centro de Ayuda da as Cortes de Calforia (www sucorte.ca.gov), en la biaotece de leyes de su candada o on la corte que fe quede més cerce. Si no puede pagar le cunts de presentact, pide al secretaio do a corto quo 0 dé un formataro de exencién ce pago de cuotes. Sino presenta su respuesta a emo, puede perder el caso por inoumplimiento y la corte lo | podrd quitar su svelte, dinoroy bienes sin mde advertoncla Hay ofros requistes legals. Es recamandable que lame a un abogedo inmedlataments, Sino conoce @ un abogedo, puede lamar a un servicio de remision a abogados. Sino puede pager 8 un sbogado, es posible que cumple con los requitioe para obtener servicios logalesgratulos de un programa de servicios legates sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de ucro en o! sitio wab de Calorie Legal Services, (see awolpcaiforia.or), on of Cento de Ayuda de las Cortes de Caffomia, (www sucote.ca.gov) ¢ ponkindase an contacto can fa corte of Colegio de abogados locales. AVISO: Por ey la corte tione derecho a rectemar ls cuotesy le costae exentos por imponer un grevaman sabre ‘cualquier recuperactén de $10,000 6 més de valor recibide mediante un acuardo o una cancesion de erbirale en un caso de derecho chi. Tene quo 01 gravamen do a corte antes de que la corte pueda desechar ef caso. ‘The name and address of the court is: aR Aine og inomive y aioe de leosre 3) “CHU T5=54 8 487 San Francisco Superior Court 400 McAllister Street San Francisco, CA 94102 The name, address, and telephone number of plaints attomey, or plaintf. without an attomey, is: {E_ nombre ta drecisn yo ndmero de felfono del abogado del demandant, 0 dl demandane que no Yene abogade, es): Michael A. Kelly / Valerie N. Rose Walkup, Melodia, Kelly & Schoenberger 650 California Street, 26th Floor 419-861-7910 San Francisco, CA 94108 DATE: le, , otha Ol 162015 CLEAKOFTHECOURT Clorby “ARLENE RAMOS Deputy 3 proof of service oF this summons, use Proof of Service of Summons (form Ny (Para prueba de entrega de esta citacién use el formulario Proof of Service of Summons, (POS-010)). eee ee NOTICE TO THE PERSON SERVED: You ore seed 4. (of asan indhidual defendant, 2. as the person sued under the fictitious name of (specify): 3. (2) on behalf of (specify): under: CCP 416.10 (corporation) CCP 416.60 (minor) CCP 41620 (dene corporation) oP 418.70 (conservatee) GP 416.40 association or partnership) GP 418.90 (authorized person) ster (ope) © 4. (l by personal delivery on (date): TRE” pe oe : an = ane @isanitiaae amb, Amanda 1314cm.o10 "TORE OR PAT WNC AFTORNE lam So |“uichael A. Kelly / Valerie Walkup, Melodia, Kelly 650 California Street, San Francisco, CA 94108 reannxeno: 415-981-7210 -Avronney FoR Nene): Plaintiff ‘ac ato Rose 71460 / 272566 & Schoenberger 26th Floor rex: 415-391-6965 For COURT UE OMY” 5 ‘SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF WALNG ADDRESS cryawozr cove: San “Francisco, San Francisco smecraooness: 400 McAllister Street cA 94102 sramcnne: Civic..Center Courthouse ~ Fddide” oct 162018 CLERK)OF THE COURT & ar) aor CASENAME: LAMB v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ‘Complex Case Designation Unlimited ~— (Limited on 7 [El Untinted "Ca Lmtad counter Cl Joinder HU 15-548487 | demanded demanded Is Filed with first appearance by defendant ce ‘exceeds $25,000) $25,000 or less) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) oer: ems 1-6 below must be completed (see instructions on page 2). Uninsured motorist 48) ‘Other PUPDAWD (Personal inluryiProperty DamagerWrongful Death) Tort ‘Anbestos (04) rodhctHabity (24) Medial malpractice (48) (Other PUPDAWD (23) Non-PUPDAWD (Other) Tort Gul rights (08) Defamation (13) Fraud (16) Intelectual property (19) Professions! negigence (25) (Other non-PUPDIND tort (35) Employment ‘Wrongful termination (36) ther employment (15) ‘Business tuna business practice (07) [TV CReck one box below Tor the case type that best describes this case: ‘Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation ‘Aa (22) ‘Breach of contractharranty (06) I. Rules of Court, rules 3.400-3.403) Rule 3.740 collections (08) Other collections (08) {Insurance coverage (18) ‘Other contract (37) Roal Property CD Eminent domaininverse ‘condemnation (14) ‘Wrongful evition (38) ther real property 26) Unlawful Detainer Commercial (31) Residential (32) Drugs (98) Judicial Review ‘Asset forfeltur (08) Petition re: arbitration award (11) ‘Writ of mandate (02) ‘Other judola reviow (39) ‘Antu rade regulation (3) CConsiuctlon detect (10) Mess tot (40) ‘Secures igation (28) Envronmonta/ onl tot 80) Insurance coverage caims arising om the stove sted provstonaly complex case types ci) Enforcement of Judgment CY Enforcement of judgment (20) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint RICO 27) (Otner complaint (not peated above) (42) Miscellaneous Civil Potton Partereip and corporate governance (21) ‘ther petton (nt specie’ above) (43) 2. Thiscase CQ is TED isnot complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the factors requiring exceptional judicial management: a, [) Large number of separately represented parties d. [} Large number of witnesses b. [2] Extensive motion practice ralsing difficult or novel Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts Issues that wil be time-consuming to resolve in other countias, states, or countries, or in a federal court ¢. CL) Substantia! amount of documentary evidence —_f._ [7 Substantial postjudgmpr} judicial supervision Remedies sought (chock a tat spp: a. monetary b, [-Lnonmoncary,d injunctive rete c. Personal 1 Number of eauses of acion(speaiyy: Negligence Ticats CD erat lose eoton suit I here ae any known related cases, fle and serve a notoe of related case, Date: October 16, 2015 Valerie N. Rose > CTYPE OR RTE FORFAR NoTICE = Plaintif must file this cover sheet with the frst paper filed in the action of proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed under the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Insitutions Code). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.220.) allure to file may result ‘sanctions. ‘= File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule. « Ifthis case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court, you must serve @ copy ofthis cover shi ‘other parties to the action or proceeding, ‘© Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for st 5 ser Den CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET al i GSaahrRRRASSTE SEER pert age ia Lamb, Amanda 13147© ° cMo10 INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO COMPLETE THE COVER SHEET To Pia First Ifyou are i 3, a complain in a civ ust Srila ar fl, song wih Ver fet paper the Ci Gaoo Uovor shor conayed oe mace ete isaac Yr ‘along with your irs ‘numbers States about ‘cases fled. You must ce iota items 1 throug ‘used fo compile n the sheet. In tem 1, you must check at ‘one box for the case type that best describes the case. If the case fits both a general arid @ more epecific type of case listed In tem 1, Stock he more epecl oe jo assist you in comy Es aheet mud be te! iy wis your property, sttactnent The oentheaien ‘case will be subject to the requirements for service and obtaining a judgment in rule 3.7 To.Pario in Complex Cazea.n compl Sorpling ho appropri boxes ner and ¥s pai Goigoies so ‘com 2 sign empl a partion oth acon A defendant may le plalife destne case is complex. ‘CASE TYPES AND EXAMPLES ite (22) Por Breach of ConractWaranty (06) eat eee ‘Broach of RentaVL.saca Uninsured Motorist (48) (tho (Other PUPDIWO (Personal Injury! Property Damagerongful Beth) ‘Asbostes (04) ‘Asbestos Property Damage ‘Asbestos Personal Inury! ‘Wrongful Death Product Liabity (not asbestos or ‘oxifenvrenmenta) (24) Medical Malpractice (45) Merial Maran. Physicians & Surgeons (Other Professional Health Care Malpractice (Other PUPDAWD (23) Intentional Bolly InjuyPOAD (e9, assaut, vandalism) Intentional Inftion of, Emotional Distress Non-PUPDIWD (Other) Tort Business TortUnfal Business Practica (07) (Chl Rights (¢.g, discrimination, false ast) (rot cv assent) (08) Detain (2g ander) Fraud (16) Inilectual Property (19) Professional Negligence (25) Legal Maipractcn. trae Kon PYPDID Tat (95) Employment "Arg Teminaton Stor Empyment ‘CRO Pee. SVT asp serial FaRMs™ the case has multiple causes of action, check rit nape fale to file a cover sheet with Ie couneel, or both fo conctone under Wise 230 and 3220 of ne Gators Rul To Parties Ini Rule 3.740 Collections Cases: A "collections case" under rule 3.740 is defined ‘owed in a sum stated to be certain that is not more than $25,000, exclusive of intorest and attor which a was sequred on credit. A collections case does not include an action se ‘a case as a rule 3.740 timo-for-service erequrements and case management rules, uni of the cases that belong fa of ‘of real property, (4 recovery of personal Contract (no unlawful dotainor iH Pile (re aud or negligence) kat ‘oust of Contac jaranty thor Broach of ContraciWarranly Callectons (2.g., money owed, open book accounts) (0 Collection Case-SellerPlaintit (ther Promissary NotelColections Case Insurance Coverage (not provisionally ‘compioy) (i) ‘to Subrogation Gtter Coverage otner Conrad (9) “Contec Fraud Strer Contact Dispute Real Eminent Bomalnfwerse ‘Sondermnatin (14). ‘wrong Eton (3) Wit Posssten el Prope tot Possession orgage Foreclosure Guet tae Ctner Real Property (ot ominent oman, landoratanart oF ‘rooesur) Uniaqtu Detaner ‘Commersal (3) Rosigontal 2) Drugs (28) ff ie caso inotes Haga ‘hugs check this om, tert, ‘pport ae Commercial or Resaerila) Suda Review “aset Forfoture (05) Potton fe: Artration Award (11) ‘Witt Mandate (02) Wrteaamiistatve Mandamus \irteMandam on tinted Court ‘Case Maton Wilcotner Lied Court Case Revie (Other Juicil Review (39) Raview of Health Oficar Order Notice of Appeal-Labor ‘Commissioner Appeals CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET re box that best indicates Se meer a Bae paper fed ina chil case may subject a party, nsive pleading. A rule 3.740 ie primary cause of action. below. A cover mnoyetaes, anei Forno fr foes, ar ranean in king the folowing (1) for roperty, or (5) @ prejudgment writ of i ‘ago onthe fr mare tt twit bs exer defendant fies ares ‘exempl from the goneral lloctions ‘cases only, parties must also use the Civil Case Cover Sheet to designate whether the ‘case is complex under rule 3.400 of the Califomia Rules of Court, this must be indicated complex, the caver sheet must be served with the ‘and serve no later than the time ofits first appearance a joinder in the tion, @ counter-designation that the case is not complex, or, If the plaintiff has made no designation, a designation that Provislonally Complex Civil Litigation (Cal. Rules of Court Rules 3400-2408), ‘Anrue Trade Regulation (03) Constucon Defse (1) Gime ving ane Tor 4) Secs rn Eruronmental oe Tor (0) iar Comrge Ct (arsing fom prvisanaly complex ‘200 po lsd above) (41, Enexconentf samen’ TEraoreoment of ugrnent “Abstract of Jodgment (Out of contessoy of ‘Judgment (non omost rata) ‘Sister Sate Judgment ‘Administrative Agency Award - 3 unpaid faxes) patlbelColieation or Eiy of Judgment on Unpald Taxos ‘Other Enforcement of Judgment Casa iscalenaous Gv Comat Ota Compan rt pod or Cort (ro above) (42) Declaratory Reet On Injunctive Relief Only (non- hherasamont) ‘Mechanios Lien ‘Other Commercial Complaint Case ‘Other Civ Complaint (ron *) Miscollaneous Civil Petition Partnership and Corporate ident Adult Election Contest Poition for Name Change Petition for Rel trom Late lain (thor CMI Patton Lamb, Amanda 13141 Pato© ° uwomces of WALKUP, MELODIA, KELLY & SCHOENBERGER APHORESONALCORPOEATON E ACETATES, FL dade MICHAEL A. KELLY (State Bar #71460) oct 16 2015 VALERIE N. ROSE (State Bar #272566) OF THE COURT ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF CLERT t ry. Bt ‘Deputy Clerk IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AMANDA LAMB, caseNo. (G0 -15-548487 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES [Canses of Action: Negligence- Personal v. Injury; Amount in Controversy Exceeds $50,000] UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC, RASIER, LLC; RASIER-CA, LLC; STEVEN ERNEST | DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL ELIAS, and DOES ONE through FIFTY, Inclusive, Defendants FAxrp Ei se of Action [Negligence- Pc eee Plaintiff AMANDA LAMB complains of the defendants, and cach of them, and for a First Cause of Action alleges that: 1. The true names or capacities, whether individual, corporate, governmental or associate, of the defendants named herein as DOE are unknown to plaintiff, who therefore sues said defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff prays leave to amend this Complaint to show their truc names, capacities, or basis of liability when the same have finally been determined. 2. Plaintiffis informed and believes, and upon such information and belief alleges, that each of the defendants designated herein as Doe is negligently or otherwise legally responsible in some manner for the events and happenings herein referred to, and negligently or COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES -CASENOwea awa n © ° otherwise caused injury and damages proximately thereby to plaintiff, as hereinafter alleged. 3. _Atall times herein mentioned, each and every of the defendants was the agent, servant, employee, partner, joint venturer, alter ego, affiliate, and/or franchisee of each of the other defendants, and each was at all times acting within the scope of such agency, service, partnership, employment, joint venture, affiliation and/or franchise. 4, Atall times herein mentioned, defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER LLC and RASIER-CA LLC were business organizations, the nature and form of which are unknown to plaintiffs at this time, and plaintiffs pray leave to amend this complaint when the same is finally ascertained. At all times herein mentioned, the aforesaid defendants conduct business in the State of California and had their principal place of business in the City and County of San Francisco, California. 5. Atal times herein mentioned, STEVEN ERNEST ELIAS and DOES ONE through ‘TEN, and each of them, were owners of a certain Toyota Camry, bearing California State vehicle license number 6PWW465 which said vehicle was being operated by the defendants STEVEN ERNEST ELIAS and DOES ONE through TWENTY, and each of them, with the permission and consent of the defendants, and each of them. 6. tall times herein mentioned, defendant STEVEN ERNEST ELIAS was a driver for defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and/or RASIER LLC and RASIER-CA LLC. 7. Onor about August 22, 2015, at or around 4:30 PM of said day, plaintiff AMANDA LAMB was a pedestrian crossing Webster Street at its intersection with McAllister Street in the City and County of San Francisco, State of California. She was walking from west to cast in the designated crosswalk. Plaintiff was lawfully crossing the street, obeying all laws and regulations pertaining to being a pedestrian under the circumstances. 8. At said time and place, the defendants, and each of them, were driving the above described vehicle on Webster Street, entering the intersection with McAllister Street. 9. At said time and place, the defendants, and each of them, so carelessly and negligently owned, operated, drove, and controlled the above-described Toyota so as to cause it to strike and collide with the plaintiff, thereby causing plaintiff to suffer and sustain the injuries and 2 ‘COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES -CASENO.aaunronrn 10 ul 12 3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 8 26 © ° damages hereinafter set forth. 10. Asa direct and legal result of the negligence and carelessness of the defendants, and each of them, plaintiff AMANDA LAMB sustained injuries and damages, including injury to her left leg, including a fracture of her tibial plateau, head injuries including a concussion, dizziness, abrasions, bruising, swelling, soft tissue injuries, emotional distress, and other injuries presently undiagnosed, Plaintiff is informed and believes, and therefore alleges upon such information and belief, that certain of said injuries will be permanent in nature, the extent of said permanent injuries being at this time unknown to plaintiff. 11. By reason of the premises, it became necessary for plaintiff AMANDA LAMB to incur expenses for medical care and treatment and related costs and expenses required in the care and treatment of said injuries, and plaintifPs damage in this respect is ongoing and presently unascertained. Plaintiff prays leave to insert the elements of damage in this respect when the same are fully determined. 12. By reason of the premises, plaintiff AMANDA LAMB has been unable at times to follow her regular employment, to her special damage in a presently unascertained sum as said loss is not yet finally determined, and plaintiff prays leave to amend this complaint and insert the elements of damage in this respect when the same are finally determined. 13. By reason of the premises plaintiff AMANDA LAMB has been generally damaged ina sum in excess of the jurisdictional minimum of this court. WHEREFORE, plaintiffs pray judgment against defendants, and each of them, as follows: A. Forgeneral damages according to proof, For special damages according to proof; For costs of suit; For prejudgment interest; and For such other and further relief as the Court deems proper. moO B ‘COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES - CASENO.—zon oe yan © ° Dated: October 16, 2015 WALKUP, MELPprA SCHOENBERGER Attomeys for Plaintiffs DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff hereby demands a jury tral. Dated: October 16, 2015 .KELLY & SCHOENBERGER VALERIE N. ROSE Attorneys for Plaintiff ‘COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES - CASE NO,