Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Characterization of Earthquakes
and Seismic Hazard
Ultimately what we want is a seismic intensity
measure that will allow us to quantify effect of an
earthquake on a structure.
Sa
Sd
Sd
Period
Period
T given
Probability of exceedence
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-1
Earthquake Environment
Sources of Earthquakes
Meteor Impact
Volcanoes
Reservoir Induced
Well Injection
Tectonic
Associated with
continental drift
at edges of continental
plates
mid-continent
mid-ocean ridges
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-2
1-1
Earthquake Occurrence
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-3
Earthquake Fatalities
Total: 22711
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-4
1-2
Earthquakes in the US
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-5
US Earthquakes
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-6
1-3
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-7
Largest Earthquakes in US
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-8
1-4
See www.usgs.gov
http://www.wsspc.org/links/li
nks.html#maps
/www.consrv.ca.gov
2001 Event
1819 event
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-9
Finding Faults
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-10
1-5
Straight
Fence
Initial Time
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-11
Straight
Fence
Initial Time
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-12
1-6
Fault Offset
13 ft
Straight
Fence
Initial Time
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-13
Straight
Fence
d
time
Initial Time
Permanent
Displacement
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-14
1-7
Faulting
Fault length and offset can be significant
Event
1906 San Francisco
1959 Chile
1971 San Fernando
1857 Fort Tejon
Length
250 miles
600 miles
15 miles
--
Offset
21 feet
-3 feet
49 feet
Fault
Epicenter
Epicentral
Distance
Distance
to fault
Site
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-15
Strike-slip
Dip slip
Normal
Reverse
Combinations
Mid-Plate events - No
apparent fault rupture due to
depth or cover by alluvial
deposit
Subduction zones - Common
in Japan, Mexico, Pudget
Sound, South America
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-16
1-8
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-17
UC Regents
4-18
Major Faults in
California
Spring 2003
1-9
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-19
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-20
1-10
Terminology
A
B
Site
D
A
Section EE
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-21
Seismic Hazard
Hazard depends on size,
location and frequency of
occurrence of earthquakes near
building site, and characteristics
of ground shaking produced.
Region
Site
Building
Site
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-22
1-11
Regional Seismicity
Estimated based on:
Tectonic Features (Potential
estimated from local faults Length, annual movement,
etc.)
Historic Events (frequency of
occurrence, gaps)
Statistical analysis of similar
regions
Region
Site
Frequency
x% probability
in y years
Not a
good site
Magnitude
Map
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-23
Wasatch
Quebec
Cascadia
Subduction
New England
San Andreas
Charleston, SC
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-24
1-12
Direction of Rupture
Higher frequency
Lower frequency waves
RUPTURE SLOWER THAN SOUND
Fault
Offset
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-25
d
t
A
Fault
Offset
Rupture
Velocity
Displ.
t
trupture
Following Rupture
Fault parallel
displacement
offset often
corresponds
to velocity
and
acceleration
pulses with
duration
trupture
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-26
1-13
Velocity
High Shear
Stresses at Tip of
Rupture
Displ.
trupture
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-27
Surface
P Waves
S-Waves
Surface Waves
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-28
1-14
Site 2
Reflection
Dispersion
Attenuation
Focusing
Site 3
Site 4
Site 1
Travel Paths
Fault
Ground Acceleration, g
Distance, km
ag
Time
Time
Time
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-29
Sa
Surface
Soil
Rock
Sa
Firm
T
Soft
Rock
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-30
1-15
Flat and
uniform geology
Mountains and
Irregular
Geology
Mountains
and
complex geology
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-31
US Seismic Hazard
Firm Soil
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-32
1-16
Soil-Structure Interaction
Combination of:
Inertial Effects - Mass of
structure influences overall
response of soil structure
system (Stiff and heavy
buildings on soft soil)
Kinematic Effects -Flexibility
of soil influences dynamic
response of structure (tall,
light buildings on soft soil)
Effective damping (yielding
of soil, radiation, uplift, etc.)
See Section 5.8 FEMA 368
Structure
Soil
Structure
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-33
accel.
time
accel.
time
Ts
accel.
time
accel.
time
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-34
1-17
32%g
1940
Imperial Valley
Earthquake
Vertical motion:
Less intense
Higher frequency
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-35
Soil Site
60 sec
120 sec
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-36
1-18
Near-Fault CA Records
80%g
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-37
Comments
Motions in different regions can differ substantially.
Motions can vary regionally (fault mechanism and
travel path) and by soil condition for the same event.
Motions recorded at sites in very close proximity can be
quite different.
Ground motions have three (six) components, not one.
Components in different directions will differ (vertical
has much higher frequency content, two horizontal
components differ).
Spring 2003
UC Regents
4-38
1-19