Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-INTRODUCTIONThe dispute resolution processes, which are alternative to the traditional
Court proceedings, are often referred to as alternative dispute resolution
processes. A method of resolving a dispute can be considered as alternative if it
resolves the dispute and provide justice, with a consensual process between the
parties to the dispute.
The present era is characterised by globalisation which has resulted in an
unprecedented interaction between various markets across the globe. It has been a
great tool for breaking economic barrier and envisioning world as a market for
trade.
When economies and societies integrate it indubitably leads to the rise in
various types of disputes such as:a) Industrial disputes,
b) Commercial disputes,
c) International disputes etc.
ubi jus ibi remedium This legal maxim rightly laid down the foundation of
legal system in every human society. It means whenever any wrong is done to a
person, he has a right to approach the court of law. This legal pattern of resolving
dispute has resulted in abundance of pending cases, which rightly justifies the
clich justice delayed is justice denied. The legal proceedings in a court of law get
stretched down the years consuming oodles of money and which ultimately leads to
disruption in business and career.
Recourse to means outside the courts is prompted by the time consuming and
long drawn process before the courts, involving decision of a court, appeal to higher
courts, judicial review and revision.
Other important international conventions on arbitration are:1. The Geneva Protocol on Arbitration clauses of 1923.
2. The Geneva Convention on the execution of foreign award, 1927
3. The New York Convention of 1958 on the recognition and enforcement of foreign
arbitral award.
In India Part III of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides for
International Commercial Arbitration.
Another step in strengthening the international commercial arbitration is the
establishment of various institutions such as:A) ICC International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of
Commerce.
B) Arbitration and mediation centre of World Intellectual Property Organization.
C) AAA International centre for dispute resolution of the American Arbitration
Association and others have explored new avenues in the ADR field.
during
adjudication
will
be
rendering
legally
binding
decision.
Unfortunately, this system has lost its credibility due to intervention of politics and
communal hatred among people.
Litigation in India is generally longitudinal and expensive. Hence, there has
been considerable amount of efforts by legislature and judiciary to make ADR more
prevalent among societies.
In India credit for springing up ADR goes to East India Company. It gave the
statutory recognition to the said forum under various acts such as: Bengal
Regulation Act of 1772 and Bengal regulation act of 1781 which provided parties to
submit the dispute to the arbitrator, appointed after mutual agreement and whose
verdict shall be binding on both the parties.
Alternate dispute redressal received legislative recognition in India, after
the enactment of Civil Procedure Code, 1859 which provided
# Sec 312 - reference to Arbitration in pending suit.
# Sec 312 325 laid down the procedure for arbitration.
# Sec 326 327 provided for arbitration without courts intervention.
#Arbitration is also recognized under Indian Contract Act, 1872 as the first
exception to Section 28, which envisages that any agreement restraining legal
proceedings is void.
# The Legal Service Authorities Act, 1987 brought another mechanism under ADR
with the establishment of Lok Adalat system.
# The Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 statutorily recognized conciliation as an
effective method of dispute resolution.
# Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and A.P Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 are few
more examples in this regard.
The Arbitration Act of 1899 was the first exclusive legislation on
arbitration. Subsequently the said act was repealed and was replaced by Arbitration
Act 1940. Arbitration Act of 1940 also failed to give desired result and in realizing
its objective of enactment. Then various recommendations of successive Law
Commissions and policy of liberalization in the field of commerce acted as a catalyst
in the growth of ADR mechanism. After the liberalization of Indian economy which
opened the gates for inflow of foreign investment; Government of India on the
UNCITRAL model enacted the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 which repealed
the 1940 Act.
The main objectives of the Act are:A) To cover international and domestic arbitration comprehensively.
B) To minimize the role of courts and treat arbitral award as a decree of court.
C) To introduce concept of conciliation.
D) Lastly, to provide speedy and alternative solution to the dispute.
Code of Civil Procedure 1908 carries section 89 which formulates four methods to
settle disputes outside the court. These are:a) Arbitration
(b) Conciliation
(c) Lok Adalat
(d) Mediation.
At the same time the Constitution of India puts arbitration as a Directive
Principle of State Policy. Article 52(d) provides that the state should encourage
settlement of international disputes by arbitration.
The realization of concepts like speedy trial and free legal aid by apex court
in various cases has also helped in the up gradation of alternate dispute redressal
mechanism. One of the biggest steps in the lines of development of the said
machinery was maintaining the validity of fast track courts scheme as laid down
in Brijmohan v/s UOI.
Fast track court scheme has done wonders in disposing number of pending
cases. These courts have disposed of 7.94 lakh cases out of 15.28 lakh cases
transferred at the rate of 52.09% and recent statistics show that the number of
pending cases has reduced to 6 lakhs.
Another major step in the growth of ADR services in India is the
establishment of institutions such as:
IIAM - Indian Institute of Arbitration and Mediation
ICA - Indian Council for Arbitration
ICADR International Centre for Alternate Dispute Resolution.
These institutions provide services of negotiation, mediation, conciliation,
arbitration, settlement conferences etc. They also help in finding lacunae in existing
ADR laws and recommended reforms to overcome them.
A.
is an international
the first Hague Peace Conference. The PCA encourages the resolution of disputes
that involve states, state entities, intergovernmental organizations, and private
parties by assisting in the establishment of arbitration tribunals and facilitating
their work. The PCA is different from the International Court of Justice which is
housed in the same building, the Peace Palace in The Hague.
The PCA is not a court in the conventional understanding of that term, but
an administrative organization with the object of having permanent and readily
available means to serve as the registry for purposes of international arbitration
and other related procedures, including commissions of enquiry and conciliation. It
is a permanent framework available to assist temporary arbitral tribunals or
commissions. The judges or arbitrators that hear cases are officially called
"Members" of the Court
Dispute settlement is regarded by the World Trade Organization (WTO) as
the central pillar of the multilateral trading system, and as the organization's
"unique contribution to the stability of the global economy". A dispute arises when
one member country adopts a trade policy measure or takes some action that one or
more fellow members considers to a breach of WTO agreements or to be a failure
to live up to obligations. By joining the WTO, member countries have agreed that if
they believe fellow members are in violation of trade rules, they will use the
multilateral system of settling disputes instead of taking action unilaterally this
involves abiding by agreed procedures (Dispute Settlement Understanding) and
respecting judgments, primarily of the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB), the WTO
organ responsible for adjudication of disputes. A former WTO Director-General
characterized the WTO dispute settlement system as "the most active
international adjudicative mechanism in the world today."
In 1994, the WTO members agreed on the Understanding on Rules and
Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes or Dispute Settlement
Understanding (DSU) (annexed to the "Final Act" signed in Marrakesh in 1994).
Pursuant to the rules detailed in the DSU, member states can engage in
consultations to resolve trade disputes pertaining to a "covered agreement" or, if
unsuccessful, have a WTO panel hear the case. The priority, however, is to settle
disputes, through consultations if possible. By January 2008, only about 136 of the
nearly 369 cases had reached the full panel process.
The operation of the WTO dispute settlement process involves the parties
and third parties to a case and may also involve the DSB panels, the Appellate Body,
the WTO Secretariat, arbitrators, independent experts, and several specialized
institutions. The General Council discharges its responsibilities under the DSU
through the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). Like the General Council, the DSB is
composed of representatives of all WTO Members. The DSB is responsible for
administering the DSU, i.e. for overseeing the entire dispute settlement process. It
also has the authority to establish panels, adopt panel and Appellate Body reports,
maintain surveillance of implementation of rulings and recommendations, and
authorize the suspension of obligations under the covered agreements. The DSB
meets as often as necessary to adhere to the timeframes provided for in the DSU.
contribute to the work since decisions are taken by consensus, not by vote. Draft
texts completed by these working groups are submitted to UNCITRAL for
finalization and adoption at its annual session. The International Trade Law Division
of the United Nations Office of Legal Affairs provides substantive secretariat
services to UNCITRAL, such as conducting research and preparing studies and
drafts. This is the third level, which assists the other two in the preparation and
conduct of their work.
UNCITRAL is:
Coordinating the work of organizations active and encouraging cooperation
among them.
Promoting wider participation in existing international conventions and wider
acceptance of existing model and uniform laws.
Preparing or promoting the adoption of new international conventions, model
laws and uniform laws and promoting the codification and wider acceptance of
international trade terms, provisions, customs and practice, in collaboration,
where appropriate, with the organizations operating in this field.
Promoting ways and means of ensuring a uniform interpretation and
application of international conventions and uniform laws in the field of the
law of international trade.
Collecting and disseminating information on national legislation and modern
legal developments, including case law, in the field of the law of international
trade.
Establishing and maintaining a close collaboration with the UN Conference on
Trade and development.
10
is
the largest, most representative business organization in the world. Its hundreds of
thousands of member companies in over 180 countries have interests spanning every
sector of private enterprise.
ICC has three main activities: rule setting, dispute resolution, and policy
advocacy. Because its member companies and associations are themselves engaged
in international business, ICC has unrivalled authority in making rules that govern
the conduct of business across borders. Although these rules are voluntary, they
are observed in countless thousands of transactions every day and have become
part of international trade.
A world network of national committees in over 90 countries advocates
business priorities at national and regional level. More than 2,000 experts drawn
from ICCs member companies feed their knowledge and experience into crafting
the ICC stance on specific business issues.
ICC keeps the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, and many
other intergovernmental bodies, both international and regional, in touch with the
views of international business. ICC was the first organization granted general
consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council.
D. OTHER TREATIES
11
The other treaties governing ADR in various states would include the United
States Code Title 9, The Agreement relating to the application of the European
Convention on International Arbitration (Paris, 1962), The European Convention
providing a Uniform Law on Arbitration (Council of Europe, 1964). The various other
treaties enacted by the rest of the countries in the world are not included in this
list.
12
Labour arbitration
13
Arbitration has also been used as a means of resolving labour disputes for
more than a century. Labour organizations in the United States, such as the
National Labour Union, called for arbitration as early as 1866 as an alternative to
strikes to resolve disputes over the wages, benefits and other rights that workers
would enjoy. Governments have also relied on arbitration to resolve particularly
large labour disputes, such as the Coal Strike of 1902. This type of arbitration,
wherein a neutral arbitrator decides the terms of the collective bargaining
agreement, is commonly known as interest arbitration. The United Steelworkers of
America adopted an elaborate form of interest arbitration, known as the
Experimental Negotiating Agreement, in the 1970s as a means of avoiding the long
and costly strikes that had made the industry vulnerable to foreign competition.
Major League Baseball uses a variant of interest arbitration, in which an arbitrator
chooses between the two sides' final offers, to set the terms for contracts for
players who are not eligible for free agency. Interest arbitration is now most
frequently used by public employees who have no right to strike (for example, law
enforcement and fire fighters).
Unions and employers have also employed arbitration to resolve employee and
union grievances arising under a collective bargaining agreement. The Amalgamated
Clothing Workers of America made arbitration a central element of the Protocol of
14
vacating an award on narrow grounds (e.g., fraud). These protections for arbitrator
awards are premised on the union-management system, which provides both parties
with due process. Due process in this context means that both parties have
experienced representation throughout the process, and that the arbitrators
practice only as neutrals.
Judicial arbitration
Some state court systems have promulgated court-ordered arbitration;
family law (particularly child custody) is the most prominent example. Judicial
arbitration is often merely advisory dispute resolution technique, serving as the
first step toward resolution, but not binding either side and allowing for trial de
novo. Litigation attorneys present their side of the case to an independent tertiary
lawyer, who issues an opinion on settlement. Should the parties in question decide to
continue to dispute resolution process, there can be some sanctions imposed from
the initial arbitration per terms of the contract?
Arbitrators
Arbitrators have wide latitude in crafting remedies in the arbitral
decision, with the only real limitation being that they may not exceed the limits of
their authority in their award. An example of exceeding arbitral authority might be
awarding one party to a dispute the personal automobile of the other party when
the dispute concerns the specific performance of a business-related contract.
It is open to the parties to restrict the possible awards that the arbitrator
can make. If this restriction requires a straight choice between the position of one
party and the position of the other, then it is known as pendulum arbitration or
15
experience
level
in
arbitrating
particular
issues,
or
Umpire
The umpire is a third party chosen either by the method of the arbitral
parties or by a court to render an independent decision usually in labour disputes
when the arbitrators disagree on something. Umpire is another word for
"arbitrator" or an arbitrator appointed to resolve arbitration when the arbitrators
can't agree.
Proceedings
Various bodies of rules have been developed that can be used for arbitration
proceedings. The two most important are the UNCITRAL rules and the ICSID rules.
16
17
MEDIATION
Mediation, as used in law, is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), a
way of resolving disputes between two or more parties with concrete effects.
Typically, a third party, the mediator assists the parties to negotiate a settlement.
Disputants may mediate disputes in a variety of domains, such as commercial, legal,
diplomatic, workplace, community and family matters.
The term "mediation" broadly refers to any instance in which a third party
helps others reach agreement. More specifically, mediation has a structure,
timetable and dynamics that "ordinary" negotiation lacks. The process is private and
confidential, possibly enforced by law. Participation is typically voluntary. The
mediator acts as a neutral third party and facilitates rather than directs the
process.
Mediators use various techniques to open, or improve, dialogue and empathy
between disputants, aiming to help the parties reach an agreement. Much depends
on the mediator's skill and training. As the practice gained popularity, training
programs, certifications and licensing followed, producing trained, professional
mediators committed to the discipline.
Uses
In addition to dispute resolution, mediation can function as a means of
dispute prevention, such as facilitating the process of contract negotiation.
18
Governments can use mediation to inform and to seek input from stakeholders in
formulation or fact-seeking aspects of policy-making. Mediation is applicable to
disputes in many areas:
Family:
Prenuptial/Premarital agreements
Financial or budget disagreements
Separation
Divorce
Alimony
Parenting plans (child custody and visitation)
Eldercare
Family businesses
Adult sibling conflicts
Parent(s)/adult children
Estates
Medical ethics and end-of-life
Workplace:
19
Wrongful termination
Workers compensation
Discrimination
Harassment
Grievances
Labour management
Public disputes
Environmental
Land-use
Commercial:
Landlord/tenant
Homeowners' associations
Builders/contractors/realtors/homeowners
Contracts
Medical malpractice
Personal injury
Partnerships
20
Others:
o School conflicts
o Violence-prevention
o Victim-Offender mediation
o Non-profit organizations
o Faith communities
The typical mediation has no formal compulsory elements, although some elements
usually occur:
establishment of ground rules framing the boundaries of mediation
parties detail their stories
identification of issues
clarify and detail respective interests and objectives
search for objective criteria
identify options
discuss and analyze solutions
adjust and refine proposed solutions
record agreement in writing
21
22
3. CONCILIATION
Conciliation is an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process whereby the
parties to a dispute use a conciliator, who meets with the parties both separately
and together in an attempt to resolve their differences. They do this by lowering
tensions, improving communications, interpreting issues, encouraging parties to
explore potential solutions and assisting parties in finding a mutually acceptable
outcome.
Conciliation differs from arbitration in that the conciliation process, in and of
itself, has no legal standing, and the conciliator usually has no authority to seek
evidence or call witnesses, usually writes no decision, and makes no award.
Conciliation differs from mediation in that in conciliation, often the parties are
in need of restoring or repairing a relationship, either personal or business.
Conciliation is a proposal to be another step in the dispute resolution process that
can resolve content disputes. Conciliation works when all parties in a dispute agree
to use a conciliator, who meets with the parties separately at a "pre-caucus". At the
pre-caucus, the conciliator discusses one-on-one with each party separately, where
the party prioritizes a list from what is most important to least important to them.
The purpose of the pre-caucus is to help each party release their pent up concerns
enough to enable them to gain a broader perspective on the dispute. Then, the
parties meet together at a "joint session". At the joint session, the parties discuss
directly with each other, instead of through a mediator. Parties must be reminded
that the conciliator is there to help the parties take responsibility for managing
23
their own conflict, rather than to judge between the merits of the position of one
party or the other.
Because the parties meet separately with a conciliator beforehand, they can
release any emotional attachment and any concerns about the dispute, therefore,
allowing the parties to focus on improving the content of the page at the joint
session.
Also, if the parties will have ongoing interactions, conciliation allows the parties
to become better negotiators, because the parties discuss directly with each other,
they tend to deal more effectively with conflict in future disputes.
Conciliation can defer disputes from escalating to edit warring, administrative
intervention or arbitration. The difference between conciliation and arbitration and
mediation is explained below.
Conciliation differs from arbitration in that the conciliation process, in and of
itself, has no legal standing, and the conciliator usually has no authority to seek
evidence or call witnesses, usually writes no decision, and makes no award.
Conciliation differs from mediation in that in conciliation, often the parties are
in need of restoring or repairing a relationship, either personal or business.
24
NEGOTIATION
Negotiation is a dialogue between two or more people or parties intended to
reach a mutually beneficial outcome, resolve points of difference, to gain advantage
for an individual or collective, or to craft outcomes to satisfy various interests.
Negotiation occurs in business, non-profit organizations, and government
branches, legal proceedings, among nations and in personal situations such as
marriage, divorce, parenting, and everyday life. The study of the subject is called
Barriers
Die-hard bargainers
Lack of trust
Informational vacuums and negotiator's dilemma
25
Structural impediments
Spoilers
Cultural and gender differences
Communication problems
The power of dialogue
EXPERT DETERMINATION
Expert determination is a historically accepted form of dispute resolution
invoked when there is not a formulated dispute in which the parties have defined
positions that need to be subjected to arbitration, but rather both parties are in
agreement that there is a need for an evaluation. Expert determination is a
procedure by which the parties to a dispute appoint an independent and neutral
expert to determine the dispute in private. Like arbitration, it allows trade secrets
and other sensitive information to be kept out of the public domain. The expert will
be a person with specialist or technical knowledge relevant to the dispute.
MEDIATION - ARBITRATION
26
But there is no indication that companies are using this contradictory system
through the approach of the mediator, who initiates his intervention while knowing
he will eventually have to become an arbitrator within the same case.
It is therefore difficult not to consider that he will not adopt a position of
instructor (in the sense of the judge) during the first stage, instead of being a
mediator.
Indeed, if the mediation process fails, whatever the reason - even because of
his incompetence - the mediator becomes an arbitrator.
MINI TRIAL
A mini-trial is an alternative method for resolving a legal dispute from a
formal court trial. Mini-trials, like mediations and arbitrations, constitute unique
forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) favored by courts and litigants
alike. There has been a general increase in all forms of ADR in recent years because
27
of the advantages offered: reduced cost, fast resolution, privacy, and less
adversity in effect. A mini-trial is really not a trial at all. Rather, it is a settlement
process in which the parties present highly summarized versions of their respective
cases to a panel of officials who represent each party (plus a neutral official) and
who have authority to settle the dispute. The presentation generally takes place
outside of the courtroom, in a private forum. After the parties have presented
their best case, the panel convenes and tries to settle the matter.
OMBUDSPERSON
An organizational ombudsman is a designated neutral or impartial dispute
resolution practitioner whose major function is to provide independent, impartial,
confidential and informal assistance to managers and employees, clients and other
stakeholders
of
corporation,
university,
non-governmental
organization,
TWO-TRACK APPROACH
28
Party autonomy. Because of its private nature, ADR affords parties the
opportunity to exercise greater control over the way their dispute is resolved
than would be the case in court litigation. In contrast to court litigation, the
parties themselves may select the most appropriate decision-makers for their
dispute. In addition, they may choose the applicable law, place and language of
the proceedings. Increased party autonomy can also result in a faster process, as
parties are free to devise the most efficient procedures for their dispute. This
can result in material cost savings.
Neutrality. ADR can be neutral to the law, language and institutional culture
of the parties, thereby avoiding any home court advantage that one of the
29
parties may enjoy in court-based litigation, where familiarity with the applicable
law and local processes can offer significant strategic advantages.
formally into legal systems, in order to capitalise on the typical advantages of ADR
over litigation:
Suitability for multi-party disputes
Flexibility of procedure - the process is determined and controlled by the
parties to the dispute
Lower costs
Less complexity ("less is more")
30
In an era, like our very own, where the population is humongous, there are a
innumerable sectors from where cases and disputes arise, not all of them can
be brought to the court, as only important issues ought to be dealt with
there. The saying, justice delayed is justice denied can be sacked through
this system. The unnecessary burden upon the courts can be removed and
hence elongation can be avoided. Moreover these processes can commence at
any point of time, unlike anticipating the stipulation of dates as and when
pleased by the court.
The most elementary benefit of the ADR system is saving costs, giving
control to the disputants and thus avoiding the vicious litigation process.
Such process (like ADR) results in substantial savings of court fees, lawyers
31
incentives, and other costs because they do not include time consuming and
expensive discovery that is quite prevalent in different courts. Other such
elaborate practices are also deemed redundant.
the presence of the other party. There is no mind games involved because the
victimized party addresses the opposite party/ parties directly. This process
thus provides a catharsis for the mindset of parties that can endanger a
willingness to resolve differences between them in courts. Moreover since they
are heard in the presence of a neutral authority figure, the parties often feel
that they have had their day in the court.
Access to justice is much easier and much faster in case of ADR, because it
allows people, who cannot afford fees or cannot afford to lose time, to
acquire a remedy without getting into the sweat breaking system of the
court.
People solving their disputes through the ADR have the benefit of solving
their own cases themselves, and hence are representing themselves per se.
Generally court litigation can be very difficult for the per se litigant, who is
unable to navigate himself through the court proceedings and trial. With the
downturn in the economy, studies show that fewer parties are represented
by the counsel, and that lack of representation negatively impacts the per se
litigants case. Thus is this manner access to justice is much faster and more
number of people are encouraged to solve the issue through ADR mechanism.
32
It focuses on the issues that are important to the people instead of just
stressing upon the legal rights and obligations.
Resolutions through these systems are brief and brisk. Avoiding the
unnecessary litigated outcomes, the parties involved can just acquire the
result they want and are comfortable with. The 3rd party involved efficiently
handles this plan. i.e. (mediator, arbitrator, conciliator etc.) they identify and
frame the relevant interests and issues of the parties, help them to access
the quantity of risk, suggest relevant options and hence lead them to a
particular and appropriate solution. This is accomplished by meeting with the
parties separately and hence suggesting to them the issues upon which they
have to focus rather than just going by the rules stated in the black words on
a white paper.
It leads to more flexible remedies than in court, i.e. the people make
agreements that the court cannot order or enforce upon.
33
It produces good results by reducing stress upon the people and satisfying
them by giving them the desired results and by preserving good relationships
between them.
There are no winners or losers here. The 3rd party has no authority to
impose any advice or remedy atop the parties. The said resolutions are solely
voluntary and on the sole discretion of the parties. Here the parties retain
their options.
34
the grounds for court review of an award received through arbitration are
very much limited. There is lesser chance for the award of arbitration to be
challenged. It is final and binding on the parties thereof.
Time to flip the coin as we go through the demerits of the said system. The
following section of the paper will discuss the demerits of the ADR system.
35
Compromise of Confidentiality.
Prima facie, confidentiality of the proceedings seems to be a boon for such a
dispute, however, in practice, it might prove to be a double edged weapon, as it
might
lead
to
certain
difficulties
and
obstructions.
In
the
proceedings
confidentiality may be difficult for the parties to use the award or any other part
of the arbitration in later proceedings.
Limited Judicial Review.
Another everlasting problem faced by parties taking recourse to the ADR
system is the power of limited or negligible Judicial Review An arbitral award is
final and binding on the parties and excluded to appeal to the courts in connection
with it. The court review of arbitral awards is quite limited.
Informal, more opportunity of abuse of power.
Though very uncommon, power abuse sometimes is something to worry about in
case of Alternative Dispute Resolution systems. Since the mediator/ arbitrator/
conciliator does not have to follow any formal code of prescribed text, he
sometimes goes out of the way to make things good or sometimes even worse for
the parties to the dispute.
ADR cannot be binding on future cases, i.e. the remedy of one case cannot be
taken as the guiding stone for another or it, the remedy, cannot be taken as a
legal precedent.
Unfamiliarity with the procedure and Lack of awareness.
36
Last but not the least, one of the most glaring difficulties faced by the
alternative methods of dispute resolution is that most of the people, be it the
patentee or the companies or the attorneys, are unfamiliar with the processes since
this is a fairly novel concept. It is the lack of knowledge and awareness with
respect to the various methods for dispute resolution that more often than not
discourage parties from considering this option seriously.
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was passed on the basis of the
UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, 1985 and
UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules, 1980.It had been recommended by General Assembly
of the United Nations that all countries should give due consideration to the said
Model Law in view of the desirability of uniformity of the law of arbitral
procedures and the specific needs of the international commercial arbitration
practices. It has also recommended the use of the said Rules in cases where a
dispute arises in the context of international commercial relations and the parties
37
ARBITRATION PROVISIONS:
Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; arbitration means any
arbitration whether or not administered by a permanent arbitral institution. This
has been discussed in S.2 of the Act, along with other definitions, which are
peculiar to the Act. Under the Act, written communication is delivered when it
reaches the other partys place of business, habitual residence or mailing address.
If such an address cannot be traced recorded attempt to find out and mail to the
old address is sufficient (S.3). In the event that either of the parties knows of a
provision from which either party derogate, or any part of the agreement has not
been complied with, if no obligation is raised to such non-compliance, it is taken that
the party has given up his right to object and that right will be waived. (S.4) The
extent of Judicial Intervention and Administrative assistance is discussed in Ss. 5
& 6 of the Act.
Part II of the Act deals with Arbitration Agreements. Section 7 defines an
arbitration agreement as an agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all
or certain disputes which have arisen or which may arise between them in respect
of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not. An arbitration
agreement may be in the form of an arbitration clause in a contract or in the form
of a separate agreement and it shall be in writing. In case of a judicial application
being filed for a dispute between parties who have agreed to arbitrate, the judicial
authority may refer the case to arbitration if he feels and arbitration can take
38
place even if the issue is pending before the judicial authority (S.8). The provisions
regarding interim measures are made under S.9 of the Act.
Part III of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 contains provisions
regarding the composition of an Arbitral Tribunal. The parties to an arbitration
agreement are free to determine the number of arbitrators they want and any
person, of any nationality may be appointed as the arbitrator. The parties are also
free to decide on the procedure of arbitration. In case of a three arbitrator
approach each party nominates an arbitrator and the two said nominees should
nominate a third arbitrator. In case either of the parties fails to nominate an
arbitrator or the two nominees does not appoint a third arbitrator in 30 days the
Chief Justice or any other institution may on a request by either party appoint the
arbitrator. Other provisions regarding the appointment of arbitrators have been
discussed at length under S.11 of the Act. Under this Act, an arbitrator may be
challenged in case there are circumstances, which give rise to justifiable doubts
regarding his independence or impartiality, or if he does not possess the
qualifications agreed to by the parties (S.12). A party who has appointed the
arbitrator may also challenge him. The parties may freely determine the procedure
for arbitration, and in the event that they do not decide such procedure, the
arbitral tribunal relating to the agreement will look into the challenge and pass an
arbitral award. In case this award is also challenged, then the court will pass a
decree (S.13). Sections 14 and 15 lay down provisions relating to failure or
impossibility to act by the arbitrator and the termination of mandate and
substitution of arbitrator respectively.
Chapter IV of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 deals with the
jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals. Section 16 clearly emphasizes that the arbitral
tribunal may rule on its own jurisdiction even with regards to any objection raised
on the validity of the arbitration agreement itself the reason being that the
arbitration clause, a part of the agreement is treated as an independent contract
of its own. A decision by the arbitral tribunal that the contract itself is null and
39
void does not render the arbitration clause as invalid. A plea that the arbitral
tribunal does not have jurisdiction cannot be raised later than after submitting the
statement of defence and this plea should be submitted as soon as the matter
alleged to be beyond the scope of its authority is raised in the arbitral proceedings.
Interim measures regarding the dispute may be taken at the request of a party
unless otherwise agreed by the parties.
Chapter V deals with the basic conduct of an arbitral proceeding. Section 18
states that there should be equal treatment of parties and both parties must be
given equal opportunity to present the case. Section 19 lays down that the arbitral
tribunal is not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 or the Indian Evidence
Act, 1872. The parties are free to determine the procedure to be followed by the
arbitral tribunal in the course of proceedings. In the event that no such procedure
is established by the parties, the tribunal may follow any procedure it deems fit.
The power of the arbitral tribunal includes the power to determine the
admissibility, relevance, materiality and weight of any evidence (S.19). The parties
are free to agree upon the place of arbitration or, if not determined, the power lies
with the tribunal. (S.20) Arbitration proceedings commence immediately after a
dispute is submitted for arbitration, unless agreed upon otherwise (S.21). The
language preference also lies with the parties, or the tribunal, which may use a
language it thinks fit. All documents submitted and received should be in the
language adopted in the proceedings or must be translated into it. (S.22)
Statements of claim and defence are dealt with under Section 23:
(1) Within the period of time agreed upon by the parties or determined by the
arbitral tribunal, the claimant shall state the facts supporting his claim, the points
at issue and the relief or remedy sought, and the respondent shall state his
defence in respect these particulars, unless the parties have otherwise agreed as
to the required elements of those statements.
40
(2) The parties may submit with their statement all documents they consider to be
relevant or may add a reference to the documents or other evidence they will
submit.
(3) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, either party may amend or supplement
his claim or defence during the course of the arbitral proceedings, unless the
arbitral tribunal considers it inappropriate to allow the amendment or supplement
having regard to the delay in making it.
Section 24 deals with hearing and written proceedings. It states that in the
absence of a particular clause, the arbitral tribunal shall decide whether to carry on
the proceedings orally or on the basis of documents and evidence. It also says that
the parties should be given sufficient notice of any meeting and all documents
submitted must be shown to the other party.
Section 25 deals with the default of the party to claim or to respond or to
appear for the oral hearings. In the case of the former, the proceedings are
terminated by the arbitral tribunal whereas in the case of the latter two instances,
the proceedings would continue with the document evidence on hand.
The arbitral tribunal may appoint an expert to seek opinion, to collect
information, and to produce a report backed up by relevant documents unless
otherwise agreed by the parties. The parties may also examine the report,
documents with the expert, again unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. This is
dealt in Section 26.
The arbitral tribunal or the party with the approval of the arbitral tribunal
may apply to the court for evidence. The court may order the evidences to be given
directly to the arbitral tribunal or it may furnish details about processes in earlier
cases of similar nature. Disregard to this order by personnel in absenting
themselves to attend to the arbitral tribunal or for any other default in producing
the relevant evidence, invites punishment and penalties. Section 27 elaborates on
the summonses and commissions for the submission of witnesses and summonses for
submission of documents.
41
42
Chapter VII encompasses Section 34, which covers Recourse against Arbitral
Award. Recourse to the court for setting aside the Arbitral award by an application
can be made only if the party to the application furnishes proof of incapacity, lack
of proper notice, not being present for the arbitral proceedings for valid reasons,
and if the decisions made are beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration.
Alternatively, if the court finds the subject-matter of the dispute is not capable of
settlement by arbitration under the law, for the time being in force, or if the
arbitral award is in conflict with the public policy of India.
Section 35 and 36 under Chapter VIII deal with Finality and Enforcement of
arbitral awards. Section 35 makes it final and binding on the parties to adhere to
the arbitral award and Section 36 gives the arbitral award the power under the
code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and in the same manner as if it were a decree of
court.
Chapter XI covers Section 37 on Appeals, the instances when appeals are
allowed and it also states that it a noting under this section shall take away any
right to appeal to the Supreme Court. Also, there is no second appeal provision.
CONCILIATION PROVISIONS:
The proceedings relating to CONCILIATION are dealt under sections 61 to
81 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This Act is aimed at permitting
Mediation conciliation or other procedures during the arbitral proceedings to
encourage settlement of disputes. This Act also provides that a settlement
agreement reached by the parties as a result of conciliation proceedings will have
the same status and effect as an arbitral award on agreed terms on the substance
of the dispute rendered by an arbitral tribunal.
Section 61 says that conciliation shall apply to disputes arising out of legal
relationship, whether contractual or not and to all proceedings relating thereto.
Unless any law excludes, these proceedings will apply to every such dispute while
43
being conciliated. The parties may agree to follow any procedure for conciliation
other than what is prescribed under the 1996 Act. If any law certain disputes are
excluded from submission to conciliation, the third part will not apply.
According to Section 62, a party can take initiative and send invitation to
conciliate under this part after identifying the dispute. Proceedings shall commence
when the other party accepts the invitation. If the other party rejects, it stops
there itself. If other party does not reply within 30 days it can be treated as
rejection.
Conciliators
a. There will be only one conciliator, unless the parties agree to two or three.
b. Where there are two or three conciliators, then as a rule, they ought to act
jointly.
c. Where there is only one conciliator, the parties may agree on his name
d. Where there are two conciliators, each party may appoint one conciliator.
e. Where there are three conciliators, each party may appoint one, and the parties
may agree on the name of the third conciliator, who shall act as presiding
conciliator.
f. But in each of the above cases, the parties may enlist the assistance of a suitable
institution or person.
44
c. In the case of a sole conciliator, the institution shall take into account the
advisability of appointing a conciliator other than the one having the nationality of
the parties.
Stages:
In sections 65 to 73 contains provisions spread over a number of sections as
to the procedure of the conciliator. Their gist can be stated in short form.
a. The conciliator, when appointed, may request each party to submit a statement,
setting out the general nature of the dispute and the points at issue. Copy is to be
given to the other party. If necessary, the parties may be asked to submit further
written statement and other evidence.
b. The conciliator shall assist the parties "in an independent and impartial manner",
in their attempt to reach an amicable settlement. See Section 67(1) of the new law.
c. The conciliator is to be guided by the principles of "objectivity, fairness and
justice". He is to give consideration to the following matters:
i) Rights and obligations of the parties;
ii) Trade usages; and
iii) Circumstances surrounding the dispute, including previous business
practices between the parties. [Section 67(2)].
d. He may, at any stage, propose a settlement, even orally, and without stating the
reasons for the proposal. [Section 67(4)].
e. He may invite the parties (for discussion) or communicate with them jointly or
separately. [Section 68].
f. Parties themselves must, in good faith, co-operate with the conciliator and supply
the needed written material, provide evidence and attend meetings, [Section 71].
g. If the conciliator finds that there exist "elements of a settlement, which may be
acceptable to the parties", then he shall formulate the terms of a possible
settlement and submit the same to the parties for their observation.
45
Legal Effect:
a. The settlement agreement signed by the parties shall be final and binding on the
parties. [ Section 73(1)].
b. The agreement is to be authenticated by the conciliator. [ Section 73(4)].
c. The settlement agreement has the same status and effect as if it were an
arbitral award rendered by the arbitral tribunal on agreed terms. [ Section 74 read
with section 30]. The net result is that the settlement can be enforced as a decree
of court by virtue of section 36.
Conciliator's Procedure
The net result of section 66, Section 67 (2) and Section 67(3) can be stated as
follows:
a. The conciliator is not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure or the Evidence Act.
b. The conciliator is to be guided by the principles of objectivity, fairness and
justice.
c. Subject to the above, he may conduct the proceedings in such manner, as he
considers appropriate, taking into account:
46
i.
Admissions.
In any arbitral or judicial proceedings (whether relating to the conciliated
dispute or otherwise), the party shall not rely on, or introduce as evidence
i. Views expressed or suggestions made by the other party for a possible
settlement;
ii. Admissions made by the other party in the course of conciliation proceedings;
iii. Proposal made by the conciliator; and
iv. The fact that the other party had indicated his willingness to accept a
settlement proposal (Section 81).
Parallel Proceedings
47
Costs and Deposit: The new law also contains provisions on certain other
miscellaneous matters, such as costs and deposit (Section 78 and 79).
LOK - ADALAT
Lok Adalat is a system of alternative dispute resolution developed in India. It
roughly means "People's court". India has had a long history of resolving disputes
through the mediation of village elders. The system of Lok Adalats is based on the
48
principles of the Panch Parmeshwar of Gram Panchayats which were also proposed
by Mahatma Gandhi. The idea of Lok Adalat was mainly advocated by Justice P.N.
Bhagwati, a former Chief Justice of India. Lok Adalat is a non-adversarial system,
whereby mock courts (called Lok Adalats) are held by the State Authority, District
Authority, Supreme Court Legal Services Committee, High Court Legal Services
Committee, or Taluk Legal Services Committee. They are held periodically for
exercising such jurisdiction as they determine. These are usually presided over by
retired judges, social activists, or other members of the legal profession. The Lok
Adalats can deal with all Civil Cases, Matrimonial Disputes, Land Disputes,
Partition/Property Disputes, Labour Disputes etc., and compoundable criminal Cases.
The first Lok Adalat was held on March 14, 1982 in Gujarat.
The emergence of alternative dispute resolution has been one of the most
significant movements as a part of conflict management and judicial reform, and it
has become a global necessity. Resolution of disputes is an essential characteristic
for societal peace, amity, comity and harmony and easy access to justice. It is
evident from the history that the function of resolving dispute has fallen upon the
shoulders of the powerful ones. With the evolution of modern States and
sophisticated legal mechanisms, the courts run on very formal processes and are
presided over by trained adjudicators entrusted with the responsibilities of
resolution of disputes on the part of the State. The processual formalisation of
justice gave tremendous rise to consumption of time and high number of cases and
resultant heavy amount of expenditure. Obviously, this led to a search for an
alternative complementary and supplementary mechanism to the process of the
traditional civil court for inexpensive, expeditious and less cumbersome and, also,
less stressful resolution of disputes.
The evolution of this movement was a part of the strategy to relieve heavy
burden on the Courts with pending cases and to give relief to the litigants who were
in a queue to get justice. The first Lok Adalat was held on March 14, 1982 at
Junagarh in Gujarat the land of Mahatma Gandhi. Maharashtra commenced the Lok
49
Nyayalaya in 1984. Lok Adalats have been very successful in settlement of motor
accident claim cases, matrimonial/family disputes, labour disputes, disputes relating
to public services such as telephone, electricity, bank recovery cases and soon.
Some
statistics
may
give
us
feeling
of
tremendous
satisfaction
and
encouragement. Up to the middle of last year (2004), more than 200,000 Lok
Adalats have been held and therein more than16 million cases have been settled,
half of which were motor accident claim cases. More than one billion US dollars
were distributed by way of compensation to those who had suffered accidents. 6.7
million persons have benefited through legal aid and advice.
50
organized shall consist of:(a) Serving or retired judicial officers,(b) Other persons,
as may be specified.
51
52
of a civil court. An important aspect is that the award is final and cannot be
appealed, not even under Article 226 because it is a judgment by consent.
(iv) Maintenance of Cordial Relations: - The main thrust of Lok Adalats is
oncompromise. When no compromise is reached, the matter goes back to the court.
While conducting the proceedings, a Lok Adalat acts as a conciliator and not as an
arbitrator. Its role is to persuade the parties to hit upon a solution and help in
reconciling the contesting differences.
CONCLUSION
Lok Adalats, as it has been again and again iterated throughout the paper,
serve very crucial functions in a country due to many factors like pending cases,
53
illiteracy etc. The Lok Adalat was a historic necessity in a country like India where
illiteracy dominated about all aspects of governance. The most desired function of
Lok Adalats may seem to be clearing the backlog, with the latest report showing 3
crore pending cases in Indian courts but the other functions cannot be ignored. The
concept of Lok Adalat has been a success in practice. Lok Adalats play a very
important role to advance and strengthen equal access to justice, the heart of the
Constitution of India, a reality. This Indian contribution to world ADR jurisprudence
needs to be taken full advantage of. Maximum number of Lok Adalats needs to be
organized to achieve the Gandhian Principle of Gram Swaraj and access to justice
for all.
During the last few years Lok Adalat has been found to be a successful tool
of alternate dispute resolution in India. It is most popular and effective because of
its innovative nature and inexpensive style. The system received wide acceptance
not only from the litigants, but from the public and legal functionaries in general.
54
PRACTICAL SESSIONS
55
FACTS: - Ciril is married to Lincy aged 25 years in the year 2005. Later it
was recognized that Lincy is showing deviating behaviour in her in laws house.
She ran away from house at night. Lincy has filed a complaint stating that she
is tortured mentally and physically by her husband and sister in law as well as
defamed by her husband by publicizing she is insane. She filed a petition for
divorce, maintenance and defamation claim. The matter is filed in the family
court which directed for mediation.
CAST:
Petitioner
Respondent
Mini Samuel
Madhusudhanan S
Mediators
Proceedings
Family Law:
Relevant Sections: - Section 5, Section 6 & Section 9 of the Family Court Act
Section 5 of the Family Court Act provides provision for the Government to
require the association of Social Welfare Organisation to hold the family Court to
arrive at a settlement. Section 6 of the Act provides for appointment of permanent
counsellors to effect settlement in the family matters. Further Section 9 of the
56
Act imposes an obligation on the Court to make effort for settlement before taking
evidence in the case. In fact the practice in family Court shows that most of the
cases are filed on sudden impulse between the members of the family, spouse and
they are being settled in the conciliation itself. To this extent the alternate
dispute resolution has got much recognition in the matter of settlement of family
disputes. Similar provision has been made in Order XXXII A of C.P.C. which deals
with family matters.
The mediators asked the petitioner to present her case
He comes most of the time in the late hours during night time.
Still the petitioner likes the respondent and she believes that petitioner is also
having the same feeling.
Hence the petitioner wants an amicable settlement and she is not pressing the
divorce.
57
58
Mediators asked both the parties for a meeting and put forward the conditions of
settlement.
The respondent should hire a house and stay with the petitioner.
him to
his home.
The respondent can visit his home and meet his parents or sister.
of
maintenance arises.
The respondent should make an apology the petitioner against the allegation
of the petitioner that he has publicized her insane.
Lincy
(Lakshmi Mohan)
Cyril
(Mohammed Harish)
Mediators
(Manu J Plamoottil)
(Mithun N S)
59
Problem No 6:
FACTS OF THE CASE: -
established under the Industrial Dispute Act which was closed down due to
non availability of raw materials. Due to the same reason many employees are
retrenched from the industry. The Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh and INTUC
filed the suit against the industry. The retrenched employees are not paid
with compensation and the industry is not opened till the date of filing the
suit. The appeal has made to High Court which in further ordered for
mediation.
Petitioners:
1) Sri Sajeer V A Rep BMS
2) Srfi Sanal Kumar Rep INTUC
60
Proceedings
The mediator has allowed the both the petitioners to brief their cases.
The first petitioner alleged that reduction of expenditure was effected for
employees of their union alone and others are considered rather with a soft
corner.
The counsel for the respondent company was asked to enhance his views.
Then the counsel for the respondent has explained the position
regarding the closing down of the company. He explained that the non
availability of the raw material, Latex, the company is not in a position to
continue its operation. The company could not meet even the minimum
production target and the company is belligerent even to pay the salary of
the employees. The company is forced to shut down some of its plants due to
the same reason and cut back some of its employees. It was told by the
counsel for the respondent that the retrenchment was not taken as part of
the penalizing act and on one occasion of the company getting back to better
fiscal situation, the retrenched employees cases will be well thought-out with
concern.
61
The mediator has ordered that the Mediation report will be sent to the
Honourable
High
Court
of
Kerala
for
information
and
further
accomplishment.
3.
62
3.
as
accepted.
4.
The consignment was not delivered to the consignee within the agreed time.
The
applicant knowing about this informed the respondent about the non delivery
through
telephone and
5,
The applicant believed the words of the respondent and waited in the belief
that the
The
consignment has not yet been delivered to the consignee even now. The
63
6.
The consignment of electrical goods was being sent to the manufacturer who
on its receipt
the applicant in
7.
Due to the failure on the part of the respondent to deliver the goods the
applicant has
goods. Aggrieved by
the
8.
applicant.
The notice was received by the respondent but they have neither sent any
reply nor
matter.
9.
The respondent has even though acknowledged this has in spite of all the
pleadings of the helpless applicant failed to deliver the consignment. This attitude
had caused considerable monetary loss, mental pain and suffering to this applicant.
The
10.
returned or its value with the damage suffered. He is also entitled to and is
claiming
compensation for the loss suffered due to the non delivery or return
of consignment.
entitled and is claiming 50,000/- as total compensation under all the above heads.
64
11.
The cause of action for filling this application arose on and after the
applicant had
respondent
are
residing
and
Honble Authority.
The applicant therefore humbly pray that this Honble Forum may be pleased
to take
50,000/-(Fifty
with cost.
65
IMPLEMENTATION OF ADR
The implementation of Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms
as a means to achieve speedy disposal of justice is a crucial issue. The
sea-change from using litigation as a tool to resolve disputes to using
Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms such as conciliation and
mediation to provide speedy justice is a change that cannot be easily
achieved. The first step had been taken
in India way back in 1940 when the first Arbitration Act was passed.
However, due to a lot of loop-holes and problems in the legislation, the
provisions could not fully implement. However, many years later in 1996,
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act was passed which was based on the
UNCITRAL model, as already discussed in the previous section of the
paper. The amendments to this Act were also made taking into account
the various opinions of the leading corporates and businessmen who
66
utilise this Act the most. Sufficient provisions have been created and
amended in the area of Lok Adalats in order to help the rural and
commoner segments to make most use of this unique Alternative
Dispute Resolution mechanism in India. Therefore, today the provisions
in India sufficiently provide for Alternative Dispute Resolution.
However, its implementation has been restricted to just large
corporates or big business firms. Lok Adalats, though a very old concept
in Indian Society, has not been implemented to its utmost level. People
still opt for litigation in many spheres due to a lot of drawbacks.
Provisions made by the legislators need to be utilised. This utilisation
can take place only when a definite procedure to increase the
implementation of ADR is followed. In order to have such an
implementation programme, it is necessary to analyse what the
problems are and rectify them.
67
reached
Issues of principle
Constituency pressures
Linkage to other disputes
Multiple Parties: Where there are multiple parties, with
diverse interests, the problems are similar to those raised
68
69
All these problems are not permanent in nature. They all have
solutions. An attempt to make suggestions for the solutions of the
above listed problems has been made below. This list of suggested
solutions is merely illustrative and not exhaustive.
An insight into the advantages of conciliation and negotiation
would bring in the desired change change of attitude. To keep active
here is awareness, by interactive communication
The other gnarling issue is corruption. To combat these two
forces, imparting knowledge is a must. Driving ignorance away would in
fact, help in curtailing corruption too. The NGOs should put in their
efforts in providing a knowledge base to the needy.
The major lacuna in ADR is that it is not binding. One could still
appeal against the award or delay the implementation of the award.
Justice delayed is justice denied. The very essence of ADR is lost if it
is not implemented in the true spirit. The award should be made binding
on the parties and no appeal to the court should be allowed unless it is
arrived at fraudulently or if it against public policy.
70
Conclusion
Because justice is not executed speedily men persuade themselves
that there is no such thing as justice. Sharing the same sentiments,
Chief Justice Bhagwati said in his speech on Law Day, I am pained to
observe that the judicial system in the country is on the verge of
collapse. These are strong words I am using but it is with considerable
anguish that I say so. Our judicial system is creaking under the weight
of errors.
Arrears cause delay and delay means negating the accessibility of
justice in true terms to the common man. Countless rounds to the
Courts and the lawyers chambers can turn any person insane.
When justice is getting delayed, people take it granted that there
is no such thing as justice. Delivery of justice is getting delayed due to
many reasons; one of such reasons is the phenomenal increase in the
number of cases filed in courts and Tribunals. The cases are being filed
mainly due to the defective legislations enacted hastily, arbitrary
administrative orders, increased consciousness of ones right and
gamblers instinct in a litigant due to multiplicity of appeals and
revisions provided in law.
71
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS AND ARTICLES
1.
72
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
WEBSITES
1.
http://en.wikipedia.org
2.
http://www.britishcouncil.org/adr.doc
3.
http://www.adrgroup.co.uk/history
4.
http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/legal/adr
5.
http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/legal/ADR
6.
http://www.ielrc.org/content/
7.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitration
8.
http://www.icadr.org/news-speechcjhc.html
73