Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2015
1.0INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
This research report will cover on product life cycle assessment (LCA)
implementation and demonstrate it with an example of LCA implementation on a
pair of LEVIS 501 jeans production.
1.2 Background
LCA is known as a tool to analyze the impact of the product to the environment. LCA
is a technique used to assess the environmental aspects and potential impacts associated with a product, process, or service (Thron et al. 2011).
According to Stellman (2011), the objectives of LCA are:
i.
ii.
iii.
LCA analyze and evalutes the life-cycle environmental impacts from each of five
major life-cycle stages: raw materials extraction, materials processing, product
manufacture, product use, and final disposition or end-of-life. LCA also can be consider
as a systematic set of procedures for compiling and examining the inputs and outputs
of materials and energy consumed within a process, and the associated environmental
impacts directly attributable to the functioning of a product or service throughout its
life cycle (Louis 2012)
uncovered that the greatest water and energy impact was in two areas: cotton
cultivation and consumer care. The new study, initiated in 2013, looked at three
LS&Co. products: a pair of Levis 501 jeans, a pair of Levis Womens jeans,
and a pair of Dockers Signature Khakis (Levi Strauss & CO. 2015).
2.0LITERATURE FINDINGS
2.1 LCA in Brief
An LCA is a structured way of identifying the total environmental impact of a product
during the different phases in life-cycle. The structured LCA
includes of goal
Product Development (PD) projects. LCA has mainly been performed for already
existing products and also for separated materials or processes.
Experiences from the use of LCA in PD projects show that LCA is applied during
conceptual and detailed design phases (Figure 2). The product developers claim that
this is too late in the PD process as material and processes choices are often decided
by that time. A suggestion is that LCA should be performed during the feasibility
study instead. Objections against this, that data is both difficult to find and less
reliable early in the process and too many assumptions must be made.
Figure 2: PD-process and integration phases of LCA today and due to recommendations from product
developers (Ritzn et al., 1996).
Use of LCA will have a learning effect of lasting value for product developers. LCA
provides life-cycle thinking which is useful in other situations and also gives a better
understanding of cause and effect between the technical performance of the product
and environmental impact. Table 1 shows the advantages and disadvantages of LCA.
Advantages of LCA
Comprehensive view of environmental
problems.
Provides comparison of environmental
performance.
Learning of lasting value.
Tool for communication.
Disadvantages of LCA
Time consuming, inventory analysis
explicitly.
Apparent exactness with answers in
figures.
Assumptions are necessary.
Lack of data and quality of data.
As revealed by Newcomb et al. (2003), Many of the complaints about LCA focus on
the intensive amount of time, data, money and effort required to perform a detailed
LCA. Although implementing the ISO 14040-14043 LCA standards costs between
4
$15,000 to $30,000 per product, it also can cost from tens to hundreds of thousands of
dollars to perform just one LCA. Many efforts are aimed at improving the individual
stages of LCA. Some LCA researchers suggest using a hybrid LCA. The hybrid LCA
uses both process and input-output analysis to develop the life cycle inventory. The
hybrid approach has the advantage of eliminating the need to define strict production
system boundaries, an often controversial task.
Newcomb et al. (2003) counts life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) problems as one
of the two biggest problems with LCA. In 1998, a conference of LCA practitioners
and methodologists convened in Brussels to discuss the issues with LCIA. There was
great concern about the appropriate level of sophistication used in LCIA.
Sophistication is defined as, the ability of the model to accurately reflect the
potential impact of stressors.
2.4 LCA Within the Context of International Organization for Standardization (ISO
)
With the passage of time LCA became an important tool for environmental policy, and
even for industry. The LCA approach described in ISO 14040-14043 is essentially the
same as the one promoted by the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
(SETAC). A conventional LCA consists of the following steps (Table 2), which are
outlined in the ISO 14040 - ISO 14043 standards and in SETACs Code of Practice.
Table 2: Four steps of LCA within the context of ISO
ISO Codes
ISO 14040
ISO 14041
ISO 14042
ISO 14043
Scopes / Area
Goal definition and scoping
Inventory analysis
Impact assessment
Improvement Assessment (SETAC term) /Interpretation (ISO term)
Name of tool
Packaging Impact Quick Evaluation Tool
(PIQET)
Wal-Mart Scorecard
Features of tool
Evaluates all stages of the life cycle for
the complete packaging system and all its
packaging components per pallet. Reports
against key environmental indicators and
packaging specific indicators. Delivered
as a web-based tool.
Evaluates packaging in conjunction with
the product in light of the essential
requirements of the EU directive.
Indicators considered: product-packaging
combination, added value, logistics
efficiency, heavy metals, reuse and
recovery,
material
consumption,
environmental impact. Delivered in a
spreadsheet format.
Focuses on formulating goods such as
personal
care
items
and
household/professional cleaning and
maintenance products. Metrics for
packaging
include:
resource
consumption, energy consumption, virgin
material content, non-recyclable material
content,
bad-actor
packaging,
greenhouse gases and pallet inefficiency.
The aim is to increase the percentage of
6
packaging
made
from
renewable
resources by replacing non-recoverable
materials. The tool calculates raw scores
of packaging based on: packaging
material, production, transportation.
Other factors considered include:
recycled content, renewable energy
resources. Limitations are that the tool
gives raw score, rank and weight, which
are not readily transparent.
3.0Methodologies
Full LCA methodologies are codified in the ISO standard series 14040 (ISO
1996). Carrying out an LCA consists of four main phases (Schepelmann ,
2013):
Impact Analysis
The impact assessment phase implies the selection of impact categories, classification
and characterization of environmental impacts based on the inventory analysis,
regarding goal and scope. The impacts assessment procedure is codified in ISO
standard 14042, though the impacts are often contextspecific and can thus hardly be
generalized. The identification of impact categories depends on the goal of the
particular LCA. General impact categories are resource depletion, human health as
well as ecological and global impacts. These impacts are operationalized by specific
impacts such as global warming, ozone depletion, acidification or eutrophication. In
the characterization phase, the impacts are analyzed, quantified and calculated,
requiring scientific knowledge about loadresponse relationships. For that purpose,
the inventory data needs to be analyzed by modelling approaches, like the use of
equivalence factors or toxicological data.
3.3 Interpretation
The interpretation phase organizes the results of the inventory analysis
and impact assessment in a comprehensible way in order to handle them
by decision makers. The findings allow a global view on the lifecycle of
products and processes. With respect to the goal and scope of the study
conclusions and recommendations may be formulated.
As a basis for a decisionmaking processes considering environmental
aspects, the LCA results point out the various options for improvements
and supports other environmental concepts, tools and systems such as
eco-labelling, environmental management system.
To interpret the results of LCAs confidence limits are indispensable from
an ecological and an economic perspective. If these limits show a wide
range of uncertainty the ecological benefits of an investment become
questionable. In this case the results can lead to misjudgments.
according to LCA methodologies including goal and scope, life cycle inventory
analysis, impact analysis and interpretation.
Life Cycle of a denim jeans
Figure 2 Life Cycle of Levis 501 denim jean (Levi Strauss & CO. 2015)
Goal
Examining the environmental effect of denim jeans life cycle.
iii.
Scope
Involve all the process in denim jeans production from cradle to grave, from
raw material to disposal.
10
b. Metal mining
Material: copper ore
Resource use:
a) Land for mining and building
b) Fuel for tractor use in mining, collecting and transportation
11
c) Building material
d) Electricity for mining process and equipment
e) Water for saperating copper ore from dirt, rock and other material.
Waste:
Rock and soil produce from digging to acsess the copper ore. Sometimes there
are radioactive materials such as uranium, thorium and radium. Poisonoius
Water runoff that damage fish habitat.
c. Cotton Plantation
Material: Cotton
Resource use:
a) Land for cultivating
b) Fertilizer for crop growth
c) Water for cultivating and cleaning
d) Fuel for farm equipment (harvesting) and transportation (delivery)
e) Electricity for processing plant and storage.
f) Pesticide and herbicide
Waste :
Waste water from cultivation, dried leaf and plant.
12
f. Transportation
Resources:
a) Fuel
b) Water for cooling
c) Land for road
Waste:
Poisonous waste water from cooling , copper slag.
g. Zipper manufacturing
Materials : polyester and nylon
Resources:
a) Electricity for running the factory equipment and building
lighting
b) Water for cooling and cleaning
c) Fuel for transportation
d) Land for building
Waste:
Poisonous waste water from cooling , poisonous gas due to heating and
melting the materials.
14
15
7. End of life
The end of life the jeans either when to landfill, reuse or recycled ro the
copper rivet.
The finish jeans arrive at the marketing shop lot where will be on display.
Resouses use are electricity for lighting, water for air cool tower and sanitary
and land for building shop lot.
b. Midpoint
All of the activity in the inventory required transportation that relies on diesel fuel.
The electricity use in the activity of producing cotton generated by coal and both
of them is a fossil fuel. Fossil fuel is the main contributor of emission that the root
causes of global warming and air pollution.
16
5.1 Discussion
In doing the LCA the information gathered might be not 100% accurate because of the
author is not actually doing the research on the site. It is based on assumption and
previous research. It is quite hard to find data that can be represented in volume form.
There a lot of methods in conducting an LCA for a product, and the assessment keeps
on getting updated day by day.
5.2 Conclusion
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a powerful method in determining the impact of a
product to the environment or human well being. During this report writing both
authors gain vast knowledge regarding LCA. Both authors find that the LCA has been
updated and refined to become a powerful tool in helping designer design a better
product.
17
6.0References
Horne, R.E. & Verghese, K.L., 2009. Accelerating life cycle assessment uptake: life
cycle management and quick LCA tools. In R. Horne, T. Grant, & K. Verghese,
eds. Life Cycle Assessment: Principles, Practice and Prospects. Australia: Csiro
Publishing, pp. 141159.
Jeswiet, J., 2007. CHAPTER DESIGN FOR THE ENVIRONMENT. In M. Kutz, ed.
Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing. New Jersey, Canada.: John Wiley &
Sons, pp. 2944.
Levi Strauss & CO., 2015. The Life Cycle Of A Jean,
Louis, C.J., 2012. Life Cycle Analysis. In Dictionary of Chemical Engineering.
Reap, J. et al., 2003. Improving Life Cycle Assessment by Including Spatial, Dynamic
and Place Based Modeling. In Proceedings of ASME 2003 Design and Engineering
Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.
USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 17. Available at:
http://www.srl.gatech.edu/Members/jreap/ASME-DfM-48140.pdf.
Ritzn, S., Hakelius, C. & Norell, M., 1996. Life-Cycle Assessment , implementation
and use in Swedish industry. In Proceedings of NordDesign 96, August 28-30,
Helsinki, Finland. pp. 125132.
Ryding, S., 2011. Life-Cycle Assessment (Cradle-To-Grave). Encyclopedia of
Occupational Health and Safety, p.54.
Schepelmann, P., 2013. Lifecycle assessment (LCA). VU University Amsterdam.
Thron, M.J., Kraus, J.L. & Parker, D.R., 2011. Sustainable engineering.
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, 49(4), pp.1618.
World Bank Group, 2007. Petroleum Refining. , pp.377381.
18