1. An academic paper requires a good, answerable question that is appropriate to the field. The author should formulate several potential questions and eliminate the weakest until 2-4 viable questions remain.
2. For a long paper like a senior thesis, a prospectus should include: a title, brief statement of the animating question and rationale, a tentative proposed argument laying out the potential flow of ideas, and a chapter outline describing the anticipated content and argument of each chapter leading to an interrogatory conclusion.
3. The prospectus should present a coherent conceptual and argumentative story or flow from introduction to conclusion while acknowledging that the research is not yet complete.
1. An academic paper requires a good, answerable question that is appropriate to the field. The author should formulate several potential questions and eliminate the weakest until 2-4 viable questions remain.
2. For a long paper like a senior thesis, a prospectus should include: a title, brief statement of the animating question and rationale, a tentative proposed argument laying out the potential flow of ideas, and a chapter outline describing the anticipated content and argument of each chapter leading to an interrogatory conclusion.
3. The prospectus should present a coherent conceptual and argumentative story or flow from introduction to conclusion while acknowledging that the research is not yet complete.
1. An academic paper requires a good, answerable question that is appropriate to the field. The author should formulate several potential questions and eliminate the weakest until 2-4 viable questions remain.
2. For a long paper like a senior thesis, a prospectus should include: a title, brief statement of the animating question and rationale, a tentative proposed argument laying out the potential flow of ideas, and a chapter outline describing the anticipated content and argument of each chapter leading to an interrogatory conclusion.
3. The prospectus should present a coherent conceptual and argumentative story or flow from introduction to conclusion while acknowledging that the research is not yet complete.
THOUGHTS TOWARD WRITING JUST ABOUT ANY ACADEMIC PAPER1
VERSION OF 2015 03 24 ALLAN MEGILL megill@virginia.edu
ABOVE ALL, AN ACADEMIC PAPER REQUIRES A QUESTION. IT SHOULD BE A
GOOD QUESTION. IT SHOULD NORMALLY BE AN ANSWERABLE QUESTION. une oeuvre, cest une question bien pose. Franois Furet The question should be appropriate to the field in which you are writing. A good question will likely be simple. Dont attempt, in the question, to prove how much you already know. Make sure that you have available to you, or can readily obtain, material that will make it possible for you to answer the question, or at least move closer to answering it. An academic paper normally requires evidence and argument in support of the claims the author makes in it. Dont assume that people will believe you just because you said it.
THE PROCESS OF FINDING A QUESTION
Without being too self-critical or taking too much time, you should sit down (or stand up) and formulate anywhere from five to ten questions that you have some interest in, and which, through research, you might be able to clarify, or even answer. Write the questions down. Eliminate the worst, least feasible questions, until you arrive at anywhere from two to four questions that you might want to work with. Write the questions down. Spending a bit more time at this stage of the process, write up, in no more than two single-spaced pages (probably less) a justification and plan of attack indicating how you might approach the task of addressing two, three, or all of those questions. Ideally, you should submit this short document to an informed critic. If you are writing the paper for a class, that person would probably be the professor who teaches the class. (NOTE: Just because someone knows or seems to know a little more than you do does not in itself make that person an informed critic.) The next stage is to write up a Paper Prospectus. For a very short paper, the Prospectus will likely be extremely short: a sentence or two at most. But let us assume that the paper is much longerperhaps the length of a senior thesis (normally 60-120 pages in many Distinguished Majors Programs).
I adapt this document from a longer document dealing with the Program in Political and Social Thought senior thesis requirement.
FORMAT OF A SENIOR-THESIS OR LONG-PAPER PROSPECTUS
A Thesis Prospectus requires: 1) a title. 2) a brief statement of the animating question of the thesis. 3) a brief statement of the rationale (justification) and projected aim of the research. 4) a brief layout of a proposed argument of the thesis. The proposed argument is likely to be tentative, and may even be undecided between two opposing positions (with the hypothesis implicitly, if not explicitly, being put up against its opposite, the null hypothesis). The proposed argument section should not be confused with a thesis statement, about which some people hear in secondary school. We assume in a scholarly investigation (as distinguished from polemic or propaganda) that the answer is not known in advance (otherwise, no scholarly investigation would be needed). The laying out of a proposed argument is important, because otherwise there is a tendency for undergraduate theses to drift toward becoming, in large chunks, mere summaries of vaguely relevant material. Of course, there will be a need to convey information to the reader, but the conveying of information needs to be subordinated to the carrying out of an argument. 5) Next comes a chapterization of the anticipated thesis, giving a view as to how the student anticipates organizing the thesis from page 1 through to the end. There will be separate headings for the Introduction, Chapter 1, Chapter 2, Chapter 3, Chapter 4, and Conclusion. (Normally a thesis will not have more than four chapters and it may well have fewer. More isnt necessarily better.) These segments need to be laid out in such a way that the reader of the proposal will have a feel for what the possible argument connecting these segments will be. In this way, there will be a plausible flow from Introduction to Conclusion. Further Advice concerning chapterization: Each anticipated chapter will be given a descriptive title. Each of the elements from the Introduction through to the last chapter will include three to five sentences in which the thesiswriter indicates what the chapter will be describing and what the anticipated argument or narrative or logical flow of the chapter will be. The Conclusion section will also include several sentences, but because the research has not yet been carried out these sentences will not present a set of claims. Rather, they will highlight, perhaps in an interrogatory mode, the as yet unresolved issues that the thesis will be addressing. The entire sequence needs to be conceptually and argumentatively coherent (it should tell a plausible story, in a broad sense of story). The reader of the Prospectus should at no point be puzzled as to how each statement connects with what precedes and what follows it. At the same time, the story/argument should acknowledge that the truth is not yet known, given that the research has not yet been done.