Professional Documents
Culture Documents
III
>
DECADENCE
BY REV,
OF DARWINISM
H 'ENRY
H.
GRAND JUNCTION,
BEACH,
COLORADO
'
36
lI
37
2.
conscious an ,d thinks.
3. Huma ,n life is the
The Fu1idamentals
38
GROWTI-I
'
..
Dec,adence of Darwinism
39
.
1
LIKEN E:SSE,S ..
The Fitnda1ne1itals
40
1ntSS Jt.
But we st1'bmi't a broade1 generalization.
The whole
univers e bears a family re sein b,lance. It is tl1e warm touch
of the M~ er,, and. His i1niver sal style.. Li,ght is truth, and
darkne ,ss is error. I-Ioli11ess is pu1itJ', and sin is dirt . Phys
icaJ birtl1 and g1owth, decay and deatl1, typif 'y sp,i1itual birth
and growth, decay and death.
T,vo pictures hang side by sicle.. The subjects diff,er greatly
and they differ in size. Ffl1e larger is th e ''Dom ,es of th,e
Y osemit e'' and . the sma.1Ier ''Sun set in. California''.
But they
see.in strangely alike. The smaller must have evolved from
the larger. So,me Mahatma, an adept of the Himalayas, abte
to do ''the plant trick''t has done it. No! The san1e artist
pai ,nted both. .
41
Decade1ice of DatAwinism
Nature ''s limit 'less netw ork of types and. s,ymbols and
resem blances is wondro us 1y beauti f ttl. It wakens the spi1it
of poe.tiy in the soul, but an abse11t-m1ndeddreamer has gazed
and forgotten himself ., and is lost in a labyrinth of vagaries.
Darwinists have been turning th e world over searching for
a co,mm,on fatherhood, but th iey have found a 1common makerl1ood. An Italian a Dr. Barrago gave his book the title,
''Man, made : in the imag e of God, was also made in the
image of an ape'', and Mr. Darwin refers to it without disapproval, and the bla sphem y is logical. Darwinism degrades
God and man.
,
'
RUDIMEN Ts
''It is almos t impossible to prove that any strttcture, 110,vlever rudiment .ary,. is useless ; that _is. to say , that it plays no
part what ,ever in the economy; a11d if it is in the sli,ghtest
degree useful there is no rea son why, on the hypothesis of
direct creation, it should no t have been . created.'' (Britannica, Art. on E volution.)
'
..
42
43
Decadencc of Darwinism
1
the same individu ,al, with the most importa11t or.gans of ~he
body ( such as brain and heart) i1nperf ectly or not at all
developed, and an animal 'more like tl1e larvae of the existing
mari~e Ascidiatts tl1a11any other known fottn'', God macle
That cell was a vegeone prot~plastic ce11 and disappeared.
table, and, as all cells are ,microscopic, i11visible. It was also
hermaphroditic.
It contained hairs and rootlets, nuclei and
-nuclPo]i, mother stars ana daughter stars, grot1ping, advancing and retreati11g', as if dan cing quadrilles.
And, as the
story goes, tl1is one cell has be en the father and motl1er of
all living creatu1es. Natural selection, aided only by sexttal
selection and accid ent, has evolved the .m, b,y almost imperceptible degrees.
E,vid.ently Da1win and Wallace follow ,ed what they thoL1gl1t
the line of least resistance in introducing God before the
first living ge1..m, for, other1Aise, there must have been degeneration to .satisfy present con,ditions ,. Bttt was it no,t an error
in anothf r regard?
While they were in the business of
tllaking gods, it would have bee11 easy to have allowed for~
thre~ne
for plants, . one for brutes, and one for men.
-liobody was looking. They migl1t. have done it, but, as it is,
tl1ere is a dead lift at each beginni11g.
''We may feel sure,'' explain s l\lfr. Darwin, ''that an y vari-
ation in the least degree .injuriou s ,,ould be rigidly destroye 1.
This preservation
of favorabJe iridividual differences and
variations, and the de,struction of tl1ose w'hicl1 are inj'11riotts,
I ha,,e called natural selection or the surviv~al of the fittest.
Variations neither usefttl nor injuriou s \.vould not be affected
by natu1 ..a1 selectio11 and would be left either a flt1ctuating
eleme11t, as perhap s we see in certai n polymorphic specie s,
or would ultimately become fixed, o,ving to the natt11e of
the organism and the nature of the conditions''.
(''Origin of
Species/' Vol. I, page 121.) Natural selection is destrttction and pre'servation. All ''injuriou s'' differences and varia-
tion~ are destroyed and some individuals with ''favorable"
1
44
parts preserved.
Decade1ice of Dar'lv~
inisrn
45
Po sible. ''Attenuation'' and ''t ime ' iVouldhave been but conditions, not causes. They could prove 11othing.
It is false that in tl1e struggle for existence the ''fittest''
survive. The ''fittest'' is an ambigt.1ous word. With natural
selection it means the strongest and best armed. They do
not surv ive ; they degenerate and expire. They who bear.
arrns challenge attack. This providence may be penal or carr,ective.
It is false that man is derived from a brute and a br ,ute
from a vegetable. One of the forces of human life makes
for . a recognition of God arid a consciousness ' of sin against
liim. This was not unfolded fro1n anthrol)oid apes, for it
n ,ISTRIBUTION
46
the ornithorynchus
in Au stralia and Tasma11ia, they have
reached their pre sent abodes by evolution through fishes.
Let him asst1me it, but we beg for mercy to the man on the
street who sl1rinl<s from that 1n,ode of tran spor tati on and
believes tl1at they migl1t have been created in \Ve stern A sia,
dispersed by various possi 'ble means, wherever climati~ and
otl1er c6ndit ion.s we1e favo1--ab,le; and st1.ffered exti11ction, excep,t ,vl1er,e we: find . them ; 01,. that tl1ey might have been cr,eated
where they are. . The rapid extinction of the American 'b i..son
suggests the p,os.sibility of extinction, as a factor of the pr:oce.ss .
GE0 LOGICAL
1
SUCCESS ION
Professor Huxley addu ,ces only one more argumentsuccessive geo]ogical forms. ''It must'', he remarks, ''suffice
in this place, to say that tl1e successive f 0 rms of the Equine
type have be-en fully worked OUt, wh,ile those of nearly rail
the other ex:i.sting types of Ungula ,te mammal .s and of the
C'arnivora have bee11 n,early as clos,el,y fol1,owed t'hrough . the
Te1,.tiary deposits' ''. We l1ave a 1nisty re membrance of' having met that Equus before, and, somehow, ass,ociate l1im
with po1is asinoruni. Tl1e Professo r hangs his case On the
term ''successive'' ''succe ssive geological forms,.'. He confu ses it with ''sin1ilar'', but neither is o,ffensive. Fossils and
Jiving forms belong in th e same cat ,egory, but a radical diffe1~e11ce
betw ,een ''successive'' 01ms breaks the chain of evolution. If the ungulate f'os.sils are like living forms ., we
greet tl1en1 las old f riend .s, if unlik 1e we beg an intr ,oduction.
In either event it i.:s not Darwinism, bu t Don Ql1ixote at~
ta cking another wind .mill.
The actual origina tio11 of 1na11,brute .s and p,lants, from
one simple sit and lo,vest f or111 of organic life, by natural
a11d Godless selections a11d varia tions , is the essence of Dar\vinis1n. It is aclmitted and t1nclisputed tl1at it was first
definitely elaborated by Cl1arles R. Darwin, an d it stands .. or
fall s with Darwi11' expe1iments and arguments, and the) are
Decadence of
Da1"tvi1i1~sni
47
Vol. I, p. 35.)
How could Mr. Darwin know that the seed from which
tl1e tree of the strange bud had grown had not been pollenized,
any number of generations previously, by the strange strain?
What would happen if vegetable and animal atavism not a
teversion t-0 ancestral type , but latent generation, the wakinu
ancl appearing of a strain as old, it may be, as the race,
improved or damaged, even to, the extent of freaks or
1nonstrosities should be found to accord with all k11own
facts of the case, and to answer the hard questions for . whicli
Darwinism was devised? Surely the progression of a character beneatl1 tl1e surf ace, whether for one year or a n1illion
- -as the temper of a father 11otdiscernib]e in a son bttt en1erDi~
48