CREW: Department of Defense: Department of The Air Force: Regarding Perchlorate: Scanned Perchlorate October 2008 E

/'
>'anltor
dreaft
No
{When sampJing Was an
I
I
!requested
INo
I
i
RequestOf'S
samtl'ng if not tf not already ,analysis IlnformatiOn
'I:
lfSampted.
jaware ot State
1and federal
Requirements?
1
" sa..phd. were State lIIld
:Fede'at Agencies Involved?
1'---
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
i
! I
No Y@s I
Missoul1 ONR has No EPA Region 7 and.Mssouri We
maintain that only i
broughl it up, but I
.has not yet I
DNR; POC David WiUiams 913 ,propellant was used at this

551-7625
I:::~~.':,s:~u~egUlator
I
'PUSh@dhard';1
,POCR~_ !perchlorate. Neither of us
Izamarripa 573 Ihas solid evidence lo
1751-3107 I lsupport our contentions.
I
I
I I
I I I
I I
i
f
!
J 1
I I
I I
'nslallatfon Name 'Database Date Received InstaHatio Verified Installation Status City Slate iZIp Code iCountry 'CONUS SubmltterSubmltler :Submltter Command:CommandtMajor Primary 'Primary
Number n Service ',mg !'command:POC !POC
Agency , I '['InclUding Hame OrganlzatfPhone ing
I
At( & HI or !on
I , .
:Humbel' ,Officer Offtcer 'Hame
I
Address
iCAMP GRAFTON ! USA I iOevilS Latl:e 'NO i JUSA

IOCONUS
CONUS +
I
' j ;Phcme
Hum"",
;
CAMP GRAYlING ~EUlIER USA I

I
jGraylin9 IMI i USA I.

AK&HI
CONUS +
I
TRAINING CENTER j 'AK& HI
CAMP GRWR USA I [Braggs 10K
[ J
!
USA 'CONUS +
IAK& fj)
'CAMP GUERNSEY USA IGuemsey 'WY USA ICONUS +
II
!
'CAMP tWlnNGS I USA

i
jHaSIiDgS
ijNE USA
AK&HI
CONUS +
'CAMP JOft/ll.SEVJEfl USA

II ITN I iUSA
I
AK& HI
CONUS +
AK& HI
'CampK_ 3991
I
31612001; USA BV IBRAC
I
iNew
,Brunswick INJ I????? USA CONUS +
AK+HI
I i
, I
'i
I I
I IIII
CAMP UNCOlN
I
!USA USA
!CAMPMAIIRY !USA USA

IoMXEY
:CAMP McCAIN
JUSA
J
IUSA
.
Powderly
Eniott
IiM:S USA
USA
I
!CIidlP r.br8y iii N8IclIiII GuIr!i S!8,Uon . 196 12/51200oluSAF
INNV Small Air NatiOnal I
Camp "'lITay WA 984301 USA
Guard facUity. No
runway. No stored
I I munitions. Not on
NPl or BRAC ~sts.
Not undergoing
conversion. Not
CERCLA or RCRA
deenup. Sman
, quantity generator for
hazardous waste.;
I i ANGB J
,MPPAAKS I lusA livermore iCA
C8mp _ ..... "-T...-..ng

2911
I
1212812000: USA RCRA .;; CERClA; Dublin
I
JCA
II JUSA
94568 USA
A..-(RFTA) !
I[ I
i
I
~,' IBrjmaflPrimary Primary Primary Secondar 8econdar; Secondar 'Secondar Secondar~ Secondar Contracto Contracto Contracto-:-Contfacto ~ontracto Contracto Contracto Contraeto Requestor Requestor Requestor Requestor Requesto,
~'- '; rpoe poe poe Fax poe yPOC yPOC !yPOC yPOC :yPOC :yPOC ,POC r rAddress rPhone r rFax rEmall rAreitof sHame sAddress "Phone sFax sEmali
Phon~ Alternate Number EmaU ;Name ,Address I'Phone Alternate Fax Email. Name Company Nbmber Alternate Humber Responsl NUmber Number
Num6e', Phone , Number Phone iNumber Name :Phone biUty
N"",h",r NurnhPr NUJTII~
!
Entered having open ,Entered having 'Entered having •Entered having Entered having iHoused &lor 'Hou.ed &lor lHoused &lor IHousell&lor IHoused &lor Housed &lor iGroundwater isoli sampled fod Surface Water isediment
burn/open :ordnance jordnance : propellant I propellant ! I
i disposed of idisposed of lll.posed of dlspo.ed of idisposed of disposed of 'sampled "'r 'perchlorate? isampled for lsampled for
detonation? I, a,nd/or rocket
i motor
I
and/or rocket removal?
1,'
motor testing? i
jtesting andlor a 'I rocket motors, iIacUcal
haboratory? CADs, & PADa1\_..les1
(munitions. !mumtions
·INomenclature1 DoDIC1
lmunltlons
NSN1
other
materials?
perchlorate? j :perchlorate? ipel'chlorate?
Im",,'nt4'!'nl'lnf':p? ! l ! I t
No iNo ,No !No iNa INO No No
No
No
r
I
INo
o
'
l
INo
No
,
~o
I NO
I
INo
No
iNa
i
,No
No
No
No
No
!
No !No No No INo iNa :No No
No No No No No INo iNo INO

I
No No No No No :No iNO
j INO
No Yes No No No iNo
I
:No No
I
I
I
I
No No No No No NO No No
NO No No No No NO No No
No No No No No
I
No No NO
1--
No No No No No INo lNo No
J I
lNo No No No No No No No
• I
!
I IINo IlNo
No No No INo No No No
Yes No No
I- No No Yes Yes
INo No
I
!
i
1
I
Pllins IOf !When sampting \Was an iRAA\lestors If sampled, if sampled, _e State and ilfnot sampled, why?
sampling if not iif not already ianalysis j tnfonnatJon aware of Stale I
Federal AgencIes Involved?
·already I ;requested and Federal
I
I !
I
I
I Requirements? 1
I
I
I
j
!i
NO INA 100 iNA INA INA INA
I
f.=... .... ...._.

No DTSC Randy Adams 916-255
3591 CWRCB Mehae!
Rochette 51()..622-2411
"mstaUatlon Name Database <Date Received ilnstallatlo Verlfled Installation Status :Clly iStale I !
Zip Code Country 'CONUS ;SubmlUer Su_er 'SubmlUer Command'Command Major Prtmary iPrtmary
Number I n Se",tce " I !inchJdlng IName ,Organlutl:Phone Ing ling CommandiPOC jpoc
,
I"
Agency i :AK &HI or! jon 1Number Offlcer !Officer 'Name !Address
I I i loCONUS : !' IPhone i i
!
,I i ! ; JNumhll'"
Camp Pedricklown 402: 3/6120011uSA BV BRAC jpenns Grove 'NJ 80671 USA jCONUS +
I AK Hl
I
!
[ I •
~ ! I !
'! I I
I
I I
I
i
I
CANPPERRY USA PortOinton IOH USA ICONUS+

I
AK&HI
ICANPRAPID USA iRaPid City SO USA CONUS +
AK&HI
!CANPRLeA
, ,"
USA warmeton OR uSA cONus +
AK&HI
USA Lillie Falls MN riJSA CONUS +
AK&Hl
USA Haitiesburg Ms USA CONLJS +
AK&HI
USA Peekskill NY USA CONUS +
AK&HI
USA Riverton UT USA CONUS +
USA Mneral Wells TX USA t~~~~+
AK&H1
296 1I17I200lfuSAF lCERCLA Galena AK 997411uSA CONUS +
AK+HI
I
I
Primary Primary Secondar secondar iS,econdar secondar!Secondar iSecondar Contracto Contracto Contracto Contracto !Contracto Contracto Contra.eto Cantracto Requestor: Requesto1Requestor;Requestor Requesto'
poe Fax 'poe :y POC y poe j'Y
poe 'y POCIy poe y poe r poe r r Address r Phone ir I r Fax r Email r Area of s Name s Address,s Phone !s Fax's Email
Number Email IName Address Phone !Alternate!Fax: Ema" Name Company Number !Altemate Number :Responsl : iNumber :Number
i Number :Phone INumber Name iPllone 'blllly I
'Nntnhcar f INumhpr
Entered having open Entered bavlng i Entered bavlng ,
IEntered baving Entered bavlng !Housed &lor IHoused &lor Housed &lor jHoused &lor iHoused &lor Housed &lor iGroundwater
i
'I'
iordnance disposed of Isampled for
burn/open
detonation?
ordnance
andlor 'ocket
Ipropellant
\and/or rocket iremoval?
I propenent rdisposed of disposed of disposed of disposed of 1disposed of
testing andlor a "ocket motors, ,tactical I, nwnitions - mlinltlons· lmunttlons· f°ther I
percblorate?
Ves
motor
maint...nRnr.A?
No
motor tesUng? i
No INO
I laboratory?
INO
, i,
I
iCADs. & PADs? missiles? Nomenclature? .DoOIC? !NSM?
:
Imaterials?
1
No
1
I i
I
1
I
I
No No No No No INo No
I:
No
No
No
No'
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
NO
No
No
No
No
No
No
,.
[No
I:
NO
'No No No No No No No
INO
No No No No No NO No No
No No No No No
I: I:
No No
No No No No NO No No
Ves No NO No No NO
INo [No
I
I
I
I I
II
!
i
Plans for I
WIlen sampDng i Was an Requestors
sampling Wno t Itf not already :analysis :Information
If sampled,
aware of Slate
lit sampled, _0 Slate and
IFoderal Agenc1o.lnvolvod?
Tit nol sampled, wily?
already I :reques~ I and Federal

Requirements?
I~
i I
NO NA INO NA No documented storage.
INA use, maintenance, or
disposal of dl!1lices which
contain perehlorate.
I
I
I I
No No No pr10t knowledge
indicating need to sample
Installation Name Database Date Received Installatio Verified Installation Status City Slate Zip Code !Counlry .CONUS Submiller SUbmitter Submitter Command Command,Major Primary Primary
Number .n Service , including Name Organizatl Phone ing log Command POC POC
Agency !AK & HI or on Number: OfficBr Officer Name Address
OCONUS
I
!cannon AIr Force Base 299: 1/17/2001[USAF RCRA ieannon AFB NM 88103!USA 'ICONUS <
I (K<HI
,I
I
I I
I I I1M)
!C8nnQn RiInp 111712000 USAF NNV jRCRA:ANGB U;quey I 655341 USA !CONUS <
I AK <HI
'I
I
~AFS 1861 11I2il2oo0jUSAF jRCRA Icape IFl 1
32920jUSA ICONUS <
I
I
IV Canaver~ AK<HI
I
I
, I
I I
I
i
!
Primary Primary Primary secondar 'Secondar i,Secondar Secondar Se1;ondar Secondar Contracto Contracto Contracto Contracto: Coritracto Contrac:to Contracto Contracto' Requestor Requestor Requestor Requestor Requesto'
I
POC poe Fa. poe fYPOC ryPOC !ypOC yPOC yPOC yPOC 'rPOC r rAddress rPhone ,r :rFa)! rEmaii rAreaof sName sAddress sPhone sFa)! sEmaii
Phone Number EmaU iName IAddress iPhone Alternate Fax ,Email I Name iCompany iNumber Alternate Number Responsi Number Number
Number , !NUmber ;Phone Number Name .Phone bility
Nu"""",r Numm.r
Entered having open i Entered having ,Entered having 'I Entered having ;Entered having :Housed &lOr Housed &lor Housed &lor !Housed &lor IHoused &lor Housed &lor Groundwater Son sampled fori SUtface _er 'Sediment
idisposed of Idisposed of
burn/open
detonation?
!ordnance
motor
I'ordnance
motor testing?
I propellant
,andlor rocket land/or rocket removal?
.propellant
I
disposed of disposed of
testing and/or a 'rocket motors. tactical
laboratory? ICADS' &PADs?lmISSneS?
!disposed of
i munItions ~ imunlUons •
Nomenctature? !DoDIC?
:disposed of
(munitions ,ottier
INSN? :matertals?
sampled for perchlorate? jsampled for sampled for
perchlorate? perchlorate? lperchlorate1
I
,
malnhmanr.-.? I
No No No No No No No INO
I I
I r
! I
I
Yes INO INa INO INo No INo INo INa
I
!
Yes iNa IYes tves No INo INo INo
I
I
i
i
!
II
I
II
I
i
Plans lor
sampling if not
already
!When sampling iWas an
I
Requestors
lfnotalreallY !analys's Informatlon
!requested
If sampled,
and Federal
Ilf sampled, were State and
I
aware of Stete Federal Agencies Involved?
r not sampled, why?
I
I
i! I I Requirements?
I \
Yes IWithin 6 months IYes New Mexico
I
,Environment
t I I Departmenl;Hazar
jdous Waste
IBureau;Ms. Julie
I I iwanslow;Ph
1(505)827
I1561;Ext. 1023;
I
I
No No no NA This has never been a

requirement for ANG
ranges.
Yes Between 6-12 IYes USEPA;Trm
months Woolheater;A6anl
a Federal Center
4Wo-FFB;61
Forsyth
Slreel;Allanla, GA
I3030~3104;
I
I
1
I
I
Insta'llation Name Database ! Date Received: lnstallatio iVerified Installation Status
Number in Service i
City 1State iZlp Code icountry iCOIWS 'Submitter,Submitter Submitter iCommand'Command Major 'Primary ,Primary
Iincludlng IName iOrganizall'Phone ,Ing :Ing iCornmand,POC POC
I .
iAgency I IAI< & HI or! Ion :Number Officer Officer i lName Address
i i
,OCONUS ! ii, Phone
i i : I NllmhAr
I~
I
Cape Cod AFS. MA 178i 11120120001USAF 'CERCLA Cape Cod 2601 USA
II ICONUS.
AK .HI
i I I !
I
I i
i I I
i
I I
I
I
I
I
,CAPITAL MAP. 183RD FIGHTER WING 1591, 11115/2000jUSAF CERCLA; ANGB Spnngfield
IlL I 627071uSA )CONUS.
I
I II IAK .HI
I I,
I i
I I
I
·1
CAflLlSlE 8ARRACl<S ]USA Carlisle IPA [USA ICONUS'

I I
i
I~~SJ.
I
AFS '1/20/20001 USAF :CERCLA Cavalier AS I 582201 USA
IND AK 'HI
)
,
I
I
I I
ICDNSWCAooutIlc R~ 89! 10/18/20ao:USN NNV Not Applicable; IBayview liD 836031 USA ICONUS'
DeIIlthment, BeyvloIw I ! i I AK 'HI
i
!
Pr1m.ary Primary Secondar Secondar hcondar ,Secondar :Contracto lContracto !Contracto CaRtraeto 'Contracto Contracto Contracto,Contracto ,Requestor' Requestor-Requestor Requestor Requesto'
I
poe Fax ,poe y poe 'y poe 'y poe ',POC r Address r Phone :rFax rEmail s Name s Address " Phone , Fax s Email
Number j Email Name !Address Email Hame Number Number Number Number .
Entered having open Entered having Entered having Entered having Entered having Housed &lor Ho\Jsed &lor Housed &lor i Housed &lor jHoused &/or :Housed &lor iGroundwater iSoil sampled fOr' Surface water: Sediment
burn/open ordnance ordnance !propeUant propellant ;disposed of disposed of Idisposed of :disposed of Idisposed of ,disposed of :sampled for :perchlorate1 sampled for :sampled for
andlor rocket !andlor rocket I,removal? I
detonation?
motor motor testing?
m/llinflllrntnr.,.?
'Ii I testing and/or a j rocket motors.
Iaboratory1 ICADs. & PADs1
,
tactical
mlsslles1
munitions
I
a !munltJons
Nomenclature1 [OOOIC1
a Imunillons .other
INSN? I materials?
.perchlorate?
i
I
perchlorate? IperChlorate?
I
No No INO .No No No iNo :No INo
I I
! I
• I I
I
!
I !
I I I
I
i .
'
I
. I I
No INo INo No No INO
INO INO Ni>

I
I ! I
I
I
l-
NO
No
lNo
L
INO
I
r
I
No I: No
No
No
No
No
No
F
INO
No
I I I, i
I
I
! j ! I
I
I
I
; I
No iNo INo INo :No No No iNo INo
I
I i i I
I i
I
I
I,
I
I
i
I I
I
I i
Plans for I
When sampling Was an [Requestors l"samlJled, I "samlJfed, wore State end :11 not sampled. why?
already j I requested
I
sampling If not J11 not already \analysis Information Jaware of State IFedoral Agencleslnvolved7
randFeder.1
teqUlremonts?
!
j
No INo
I I
I \Did not lI1ink lI1ere was a

No No
need.
I
NO No
Installation Name ;Database Date Recel.ed lInstallatio iVerified iinstallation Status iCily
Number ln Service !
'State IZIp Code ICountry I
,CONUS .Submitter, Submiller Submille, COmmand! Command: Major ,Primary Primary
,Including Name :Organlzatl Phone Ing ling iCommand,POC poc
I
IAgency [ I I , I
AI( & HI ori i on Number 10000cer 100000erI ,Name Address
, I I I I. Ii I
:
I
I rOCONUS Phone
NllmMr
ClIanuIe Ail Force Base 445 8122120011 USAF Iv ISRAC
I
IRantoul I 61866fuSA
I
.CONUS •
I
:AK'HI
I
I I
[
i
I I
II
I
I
I
2I912001 1Other )NNV joakdale

i PA 15011!USA
"1 I
ISRAC jci:lNUS'
AK+HI
USA Granite City IlL USA CONuS.

AK&HI
Primary ,Primary Primary i Secondar .Secondar ;~ondClr Seconder· Secondar :-Secondar :Contraeto fContracto Contracto, Contracto :Contracto lContracto Contracto Contracto Requestor Requestor: Requestor Requestorl Requestol
poe [poe Fax poe !ypoe iyPOC :yPOe ,yPOe yPOe 'yPOC i'POe i' rAddressi,Phone;r i,Fa. rEmall rAraao! sName :sAddress:sPhone sF"" is Email
Phone
Number
,Number EmlU .Name !Address IPhone Alternate fax
.Number Phone Number
Email :Harne iCompany
I
!Name
Number ,Alternate' Number
I !
:Phone i
Responsi
bJllty
Number Number I
r NmnhPr I 'Numh,., I
I
Entered having open i Entered having :Entered having Entered having :Entered having 'Housed &lor [Housed &lor ,Housed &lor :Housed &lor iHoused &lor Housed &lor Groundwater 'SOU sampled for' Surface water Sediment
bum/open !ordnance !ordnance I
propellant ;propellant I
;disposed of disposed of idisposed of Idisposed of :disposed of :disposed of sampled for ;perchlorate? \ sampled for sampled for
i I
: -. . "1~
detonation? and/or rocket and/or rocket removal? Itesting and/or a :rocket motors, I.tactical munitions ~ munitions ~ imunltions. ;other perchlorate? I : perchlorate? perchlorate?
imotor i,aboratory? :CADs, & PADs?lmls"",? Homencl<lture? DoOlC? INSN? 'matenals?
;~lntAnanr.,.? I I
No :No No
iI NO iNa No
I !
I I
I
i
I
I
No INc INo INo INO No INc iNo INO
I~
I I I
No INO INO INc No INc INO INo
Plan. for When sampling Was an iRequestors :tt.ampled, ,If sampled, _re Stale and iIf not sampled, why?
.ampllnglfnol If notalready !analysls IlnfOrmalion Iaware of State IFederal Agencies Involved? I
already Irequesled Iand Federal

i
Requirements? i
I I,
I I i
No INo
j No suspected release
I
I
!
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
No No There is no recordedor
aneeldolal evidence Ihat
perchlorate has been or
may have been released b
Nih Missile operallons.
lnstallatlon Name Database Date Received InstaUatlo'Verlfied Installation Status City iState !Z1PCOde Country CONUS Submitter Submitter Submitter Command Command Major 'Primary Primary
Number in Service
iAgenCy
I i
,Including .Name Organizatl Phone Ing
.AK &HI or; on
lng
Number Officer Officer
Command POC POC
Name .Address
I i OCONUS Phone i ,i
I I i Numfwlor'
~AF8 203) 11/29120001 USAF iRCRA ICharteston 294041 USA CONUS'
]AFB ISC I AK+ HI
I I
! I
! I
I I
I
I
!
I
I
USA Charteston wv USA CONUS.
AK& HI
10113120001 USN INNV RCRA;BRAC Charteston SC 294191 USA CONUS.
AK .HI
Lj~L.
!
j
USAF Chartotte NC ICONUS •
IUSA
!~FIeId.4·~~lill!l' '$'f: USN Beeville IX USA
rAK&HI
CONUS'
AK&HI
CHEYENNE AFr AGS USAF Cheyenne Wy USA ,CONUS.
I I IAK&HI
,Primary Primary Primary !5econdar Secondsr Seconda, Secondar, Secondar Secondsr ,Contracto I Contracto Contracto Conlraclo"Canlraeto';Contracto ieontractc Contracto' Requestor, Requestor R~uestor R'eque,tor Requestol
'I'
poe !poe Fax poe 'Y poe Y poe ypoe ypoe l ypoe yPOC irPOC if rAddress ,Phone!r ',Fax rEmal1 rAreaof sHame IS Addres,'s Phone sFax 'Email
Phone !Number :Email Name Address iPhone Alternate;. Fax Email :Hame reompaoy 'Number IAiternate Number i Responsi (Number Number
Number I
INumber Phone Number i :Name iPhone ( ,bllity !
I t Numh#a, ; NllmhPr
Entered having open Entered having iEntered having IEntered having 'Entered having I Housed &lor IHoused &lor 'I Housed &lor lHoused &lor iHoused &lor IHoused &lor Groundwater SoIl sampled fori Surface water 'I Sediment
burnlopen ordnance tordnance ipropellant propellent disposed of rdlSPOSed of disposed of IeIlsposed of 'I disposed of Idisposed of sampled lor :perchlorate7 Isamp'ed for sampled for
detonation7 and/or rocket landlor rocket \removal? testing anellor a !rocket motors. l:taCtiCal munitions - imunitions· muntUons· other perchlorate7 ; perchlorate? IperChlorat8?
Imotor testing? I
Yes
motor
I1UlIlnttln~nr...'
No
I
No No
laboratoty7
No
I
CADs. & PADs7 mlss"es7 \Nomenclature7 ,DoDIe7
I ! i
NSN7 materials?
I
INO
I
iNo No
I
I I I I
I I
! I
i
I
I
, II
I 1 I
i
I
I
I
I
I
No No INo No No No No
No No NO NO No No No
1=
No
No
L
!No NO
No No
No
INo
No No
No INO
iNo
No No No No No No INo INo
Plans for :When sampling! Was an i Requestors 'If sampled, Ilf sampled. were State and i If not sampled, why?
i I
sampling If not I f not already lanalYs,s Information
already ,requestad
Iaware of Stata rederal Agencies Involved?
land Federal
i I Requlrements?
I I
I II II
No
I
iNo
I i Charleston Air force Base
!has never stored or lested
(
I I
I
II
solid rockets or missile
systems. Ammunition is
timited to sm3U munittons
I
I I used primarily for training.
,The RCRA Facility
i I IlnveSligation (RFt} Report
I issued in 1995 Indicaled no
I instances where
I
I II perchlorate contamination
is a concern at this facility.
I
I
IAdditionany, lIle EPA and
Soulll Carolina Departmenl
I ,of Hearlll and
Environmental Control
I have not required our EDD
Range to be declared a
Solid Waste Managemenl
Unn (SWMlJ) or even an
Area of C0f)C8m (ADC) in
I accordance willl our RCRA
Part B Permit
- - ..
- - - -
, - -- -
I
FFID Installation Component Program Sampled Detected Comments
CA957172462700 AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DERA Yes Not detected

PLANT 42
CA957212450800 BEALE AIR AIR FORCE DERA Yes In Groundwater
FORCE BASE 492 ug/L, max detect at
site 16, OB?OD
monitoring well
CA917002471200 CORONANOC NAVY DERA Yes Awaiting Results
NWAD
CA957172450400 EDWARDS AIR AIR FORCE DERA Yes Groundwater, soil Source - Rocket
FORCE BASE Research 300 ppb
detected in
Groundwater plume.
An innovative ion
exchange
perchlorate treatment
technology is
currently being
demonstrated at
Edwards AFB. The
groundwater
underlying North
Base is contaminated
by both perchlorate
and organic solvents.
CA99799F522900 EDWARDS FORMERLY DERA Yes Detected in soil (max

MILITARY AIR USED detect 36000 ugiL in
FIELD DEFENSE plume from jet
SITES propulsion lab)
CA99799F546700 JET PROPULSION FORMERLY DERA Yes Drinking water Source - Rocket
LAB USED Research
DEFENSE
SITES
))~l
CA957002474300 MATHERAFB AIR FORCE BRAC Mather AFB was a

BRAC round I
closure and the base
is a NPL, site, so we
are performing
environmental
cleanup under the
CERCLA process
with State and
Federal regulator
oversite. We have a
groundwater plume
under Mather as a
result of
AerojetiBoeing past
practices
CA99799F598500 MCAS EL TORO FORMERLY DERA Yes Groundwater 380 ppb BRAC
USED
DEFENSE
SITES
CA99799F527300 NAVAL WEAPONS FORMERLY DERA Yes Yes
CENTE CHINA USED
LAKE DEFENSE
SITES
CA99799F548300 NIKE BATTERY 14 FORMERLY DERA Yes (not Groundwater Records search will
- SILOS USED sampled address potential
DEFENSE by 000) FUDS eligibility for
SITES emergent chemicals
identified in letter
rec'd from reg
aQency.
CA957002434500 NORTONAFB AIR FORCE BRAC The former Norton AFB

is adjacent to known
perchlorate plume
(Crafton-Redlands !
Plume). Lockheed
Martin is the "owner"
(PRP) of the perchlorate
plume. They work with
federal and state
regulatory agencies and
local water purveyors on
monitoring the nature
and extent of
contamination.
CA99799F596000 NWSSEAL' FORMERLY DERA Yes Awaiting Results

BEACH USED
DEFENSE
SITES
CA957112573600 ONIZUKAAS AIR FORCE BOTH Yes Not detected
CA99799F788600 PYRITE CANYON FORMERLY DERA No Need to establish
USED FUDS eligibility.
DEFENSE Records search will
SITES also include checking
if any perchlorate
containing items
were
stored/assembled.
etc on site or if site
usage during FUDS
time era could have
contributed to
conditions.
CA99799F557900 RIALTO FORMERLY DERA Yes (not Drinking water >4 ppb Source - Fireworks
AMMUNITION USED sampled to 811 ppb Facility, BF Goodrich,
STORAGE POIT DEFENSE by 000) Rocket Research
SITES and Man,ufacturing
CA917002464000 SAN NICOLAS NAVY DERA Yes Groundwater 16 ppb

ISLAND OLF
CA957182457500 TRAVIS AIR AIR FORCE DERA yes Groundwater, Site 12 Dept. of Health
FORCE BASE Services sampled
CA957112514900 VANDENBERG AIR FORCE DERA yes Soil. In Groundwater, Tested Soil,
AIR FORCE BASE maximum detected was Groundwater,
517 ug/L Drinking water
found in
Groundwater site 8,
SLC4 in TCE plume.
z
o
~
"0
oCJ)
c::
m
"0
Q)
~
~
':C
mo"
~ ~
~
o ~
Ul :3:
c: c:
; 3
l»
~
I
Known Human
EXDosure
Exposure pathway
suspected. DoD
confirmation is pending.
No exposure pathway.
Impacted wells taken out
of service. RO provides
all drinking water.
Groundwater not used as
a drinking water source.
Phase II (State & Component Website)
1 Hardware (External Server) 512,000
2 Software
Crystal Reports Enterprise 580,000
SQl 520,000
CR Licenses (Yr 1-3) 521,000
3 Consulting Support (Database Linkage, Web Server Programming)

IEstimate Jan 04 I
. Planning & Meetings
58,000
Database Linkage & Queries
535,000
Software Programming
560.000
Travel
510,000
4 Training
Website / Crystal Reports 514,000
5260,000
50 50 50 5260,000 50 5260,0001
Notes:
Phase II depends signific;anUy on the Steering Commillee's survey. Functionality presented ailove is for a basic
website that allows for generai reporting, payment request and status.
3. TOXICOKINETICS/TOXICODYNAMICS AND
2 MODE-OF-ACTION TESTING STRATEGY
3
4
5 This chapter explains the rationale that was the basis of the testing strategy which was
6 designed to evaluate the potential critical targets for perchlorate and to establish a database
7 robust enough to support a quantitative risk assessment. Aspects of the toxicokinetics and
8 toxicodynamics of perchlorate and its interaction with the thyroid are discussed as the basis for
9 the development of a testing strategy based on the mode of action of perchlorate. Mode ofaction
l O i s defined as a chemical's influence on molecular, cellular, and physiologiCal functions (Federal
11 Register, 1996; Wiltse and Dellarco, 1996). Understanding the mode of action helps to interpret
12 the relevancy of the laboratory animal and human data to inform the most appropriate
13 dose-response procedure (see Chapter 7).
14 As discussed in Chapter 2, perchlorate salts dissolve readily in water. The resultant anion
15 is easily absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. However, because of its high charge, neither
16 perchlorate, nor other electrolytes applied from aqueous solution or aqueous media penetrate the
17 skin readily (Scheuplein and Bronaugh, 1983). Uptake of inorganic ions such as perchlorate
18 through the skin is typically less than 10% and frequently less than 1%. Exposure via inhalation
19 of fumes or vapors is considered negligible because the vapor pressure of perchlorate salts and
20 acids is low at room temperatures. The risk from exposure to particles would depend on the
21 particle size distribution. Thus, the ingestion route is the major concern for the risk posed by the
22 perchlorate contamination and is the focus of this characterization.
23
24
25 3.1 ABSORPTION, DISTRIBUTION, METABOLISM, AND
26 ELIMINATION OF PERCHLORATE
27 Limited absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) studies were in
28 existence prior to the testing strategy discussed in Section 3.5. Although experimental studies in
29 laboratory species and humans had been performed using radiolabelingtechniques, most were at
30 high concentrations, and the published data were expressed simply as thyroid:blood ratios of
January 16, 2002 3-1 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

radioactivity cou,nts that provided no information on internal dose to biological tissues. Oral
2 drinking water administration, the most relevant to the contamination issue, was not the norm.
3 Time-course studies were very limited and essentially nonexistent for repeated administration.
4 More importantly, no data existed on the co-administration of iodide (I") and perchlorate even
5 though data were necessary to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (Fisher,
6 1998a). The following section describes the limited pharmacokinetic information that was
7 considered when the data gap was highlighted during the development of protocols for the testing
8 strategy. The development of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models that describe
9 ADME for perchlorate with data from the testing strategy will be discussed in Chapter 6.
10 Perchlorate appears to be eliminated rapidly, primarily in the urine (>90%), and virtually
11 unchanged from both rats (Eichler and Hackenthal, 1962) and humans (Anbar et aI., 1959).
12 Durand (1938) measured urinary elimination from two human subjects who ingested 794 mg of
13 sodium perchlorate in 100 g of water. Urinary elimination accounted for 50% of the
14 administered dose within 5 hr and 95% within 48 hr. Half-lives have been reported for the rat
15 ranging from <8 hr (95% in 60 hr) to ",,20 hr (Wolff, 1998). Stanbury and Wyngaarden (1952)
16 reported that perchlorate appears in the urine within 10 to 15 min of oral dosing and that peak
17 plasma levels occur within 3 hr. Perchlorate was reported to undergo a two-phased urinary
18 elimination process in rats and calves. In rats, the first phase accounted for approximately 96%
19 of the administered dose and had a half-life of 1 to 2 hr. The second phase accounted for 4% and
20 had a half-life that ranged from 72 to 80 h. In calves, the first-phase half-life was reported to be
21 2 to 2.5 hr, and the second 23 to 27 hr (Selivanova et aI., 1986, as cited in Allred, 1998). The
22 kinetics of long-term administration of perchlorate have not been characterized. The distribution
23 and metabolism of perchlorate and its relevance to potential toxicity in the thyroid will be
24 discussed in greater detail in Section 3.3 following discussions of iodine metabolism and thyroid
25 physiology in Section 3.2.
26
27 3.1.1 Human Studies
28 The majority of the human data on perchlorate ADME prior to the strategy was comprised
29 of the therapeutic case and clinical studies of Graves' disease patients described in Section 4.2.2.
30 These studies established the effect of perchlorate on the sodium (Na+)-iodide (1") symporter
31 (NIS) but were of limited use in establishing quantitative dose-response relationships.
January 16,2002 3-2 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

Anbar et al. (1959) demonstrated that perchlorate was not metabolized in humans. Four
2 patients were administered 200 mg (approximately 2.9 mg/kg using a default body weight of
3 70 kg) double-labeled K 36CJl 80 4, and urine was collected 3 h after dosing. Perchlorate was found
4 to be excreted at approximately 200 ,ug/min in the urine. Total urine radioactivity was
5 distributed between 36Cl , 36CI1804', 36Cl04' and 36Cl" and indicated that perchlorate was excreted
6 unchanged in the urine. No human data existed with which to adequately characterize the
7 pharmacokinetics of perchlorate during steady-state, low-dose, repeated administration.
8
9 3.1.2 Laboratory Animal Studies

10 Although the perchlorate discharge test has been performed in rats (Atterwill et aI., 1987),
11 the procedure is very different than that used in humans and does not readily allow for
12 comparison or extrapolation. Rats are dosed intraperitoneally (ip) with 1OO,uL (1 ,uCi) 1251', then
13 dosed ip with potassium perchlorate at 5, 10, 25, or 50 mg/kg body weight from 1 to 6 h
14 afterwards. Results are expressed as thyroid:blood ratios, which differ from how most human
15 data are expressed. Additionally, the time points at which uptake is measured are highly
16 dissimilar to those used in human studies.
17 Anbar et al. (1959) also attempted to confirm the lack of perchlorate accumulation and lack
18 of metabolism in the thyroid in rats. White rats were injected ip with 36KCl04, and the specific
19 activity per gram of tissue was measured at 30 min, 4 hr, and 12 hr. The activity was greatest in
20 the thyroid and peaked at 4 h. The salivary and adrenal glands also had high activity levels.
21 Rabbits also were tested; the thyroid activity levels were again the highest of any tissue and
22 peaked at 2 h. Rabbit testes had the next highest specific activities.
23 In one of the only co-administration studies, Anbar et al. (1959) simultaneously
24 administered 1311' and 36Cl04' in equimolar concentrations. The thyroid:blood specific activity for
25 iodide was slightly higher than the ratio for perchlorate (1.80 and 1.69, respectively).
26 Halmi et al. (1956) examined iodide uptake in male Sprague-Dawley rats when active
27 transport was completely blocked via sodium perchlorate. The rats were first administered 6 mg
28 of propylthiouracil (PTU) subcutaneously to prevent iodide organification. Iodide uptake was
29 prevented by administration of 100, 200, or 400 mg sodium perchlorate with half of each dose
30 administered along with the PTU and the other half administered 45 min later with 5 to 50 ,uCi
31 1311", The rats were sacrificed 1.0 to 1.5 h after the iodide administration. Perchlorate reduced the
January 16, .2002 3-3 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

1 thyroid:blood ratio from 22.7 to 0.45; radioiodide was found to account for 30% of the thyroid
2 gland volume when it entered the gland by diffusion alone. Rats sacrificed 4.0 to 4.5 h after
3 iodide administration produced similar results, indicating that equilibrium is reached prior to
4 1.0 to 1.5 h. The distribution of radioiodide in other tissues also was examined. Perchlorate did
5 not affect the organ:serum iodide ratios in the following organs: submaxillary salivary gland,
6 parotid salivary gland, pituitary gland, adrenal glands, testes, spleen, kidneys, lung, skin, or
7 diaphragm. However, perchlorate administration did affect the stomach wall:serum and gastric
8 juice:serum iodide ratios (0.36 and 0.75, respectively) compared with the ratios for controls
9 administered sodium chloride (1.45 and 15.8, respectively). This suggested a gastric iodide
10 pump subject to inhibition by perchlorate and, as will be discussed in Chapter 6, the
11 gastrointestinal tract is another tissue with NIS.
12 Goldman and Stanbury (1973) administered 0.1 ,uCi ofthe potassium salt 0[36CI-labeled
13 perchlorate (K36Cl04) by ip injection to male Sprague-Dawley rats that had been maintained on a
14 low-iodine diet for 4.5 to 5.0 weeks prior to dosing (approximately 40,ug stable perchlorate per
15 injection). The radionucleide retention in the thyroid, expressed as percent of dose per gram of
16 tissue, was recorded at 2 h (6 rats), 4 h (5 rats), 8 h (6 rats), 24 h (6 rats), 48 h (6 rats), and 96 h
17 (5 rats). The peak was reported to appear around 4 h and then to fall to approximately 5% of this
18 peak value after approximately 96 h. An exponential function was used to estimate a half-life of
19 20 h. Urinary excretion data indicated that the disappearance rate from the plasma and thyroid
20 and the appearance rate in the urine corresponded closely although the question was raised as to
21 whether there is some curvilinearity to the urinary excretion, which may suggest limited
22 saturation. The retained dose and its standard deviation in tissues at 96 h were reported as
23 0.142 ± 0.1, 0.125 ± 0.09, 0.098 ± 0.03, 0.048 ± 0.04, and background for the thyroid, kidney,
24 spleen, liver, and brain, respectively.
25 Chow et al. (1969) compared the uptake of radiolabeled perchlorate and iodide ions with
26 stable ions in normal and thyroid-impaired rodents. Intact male Sprague-Dawley rats were
27 injected ip with 0.1, 0.2, or 5.0 meqlkg stable potassium perchlorate (14, 28, or 690 mglkg,
28 e
respectively) 2 h prior to sacrifice. The specific activity of the chlorine label 6Cn was
29 25.2,uCi/mmol. Thyroid impairment was affected by pretreatment with thyroid-stimulating
30 hormone (TSH) (1 international unit [IU] TSH in 0.9% saline solution ip 18 h prior to
31 perchlorate administration), hypophysectomization (removal ofthe pituitary), TSH and

hypophysectomization, or PTU (0.1 % PTU in drinking water for 2 weeks prior to perchlorate
2 administration). Perchlorate at the 0.1- and O.2-meqlkg dose levels was found to preferentially
3 concentrate in the rat thyroid as compared to the plasma, and the concentration was related
4 inversely to dose. The high dose level did not result in the concentration of radiolabeled
5 perchlorate in the thyroid. Rats pretreated with TSH or PTU also concentrated perchlorate at the
6 lower dose levels. At the two lower levels, hypophysectomized rats were not able to concentrate
7 perchlorate compared with intact rats, but the thyroid perchlorate concentration at the high dose
8 level did not differ between intact and altered rats. In a second subset of the same study, rats
9 were exposed to 0.005,0.01,0.02,0.05, or 0.10 meq/kg perchlorate (0.69,1.4,2.8,6.9, or
10 14 mglkg, respectively) under the same general conditions. The concentration of radiolabeled
11 perchlorate in the thyroid again was related inversely to perchlorate dose. Male albino guinea
12 pigs also were exposed to the same doses. The guinea pigs displayed the same relationships as
13 the rats, but concentrated more perchlorate in the thyroid compared to plasma levels.
14 Chow and Woodbury (1970) demonstrated that perchlorate is actively sequestered by the
15 thyroid gland at low doses but that the capacity of the symporter to actively sequester perchlorate
16 is exceeded at higher doses. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were functionally nephrectomized by
17 ligating the renal pedicle of both kidneys 24 h before the rats were sacrificed. Perchlorate was
18 administered as the radiolabeled potassium salt (K 36 Cl04) in solution by ip injection at 0.005,
19 0.1, or 2.0 mmollkg stable potassium perchlorate (0.69, 14, and 280 mglkg body weight,
20 respectively, assuming 0.266 kg body weight; actual weight 226 ± 4 g) 2 to 240 min before
21 sacrifice. A group of control rats received [14C]-insulin, 3SS0/ or 36Cl" 2 h prior to sacrifice to
22 determine thyroid follicle volume and intrafollicular membrane potential. Concentrations of
23 perchlorate in the thyroid and plasma were measured at 0.033, 0.067, 0.13, 0.2, 0.50, 1.0, 2.0,
24 and 4.0 h after sacrifice. Again, perchlorate was actively sequestered by the thyroid gland at the
25 low dose, but the capacity of the symporter to actively sequester perchlorate was exceeded at the
26 higher doses (e.g., the thyroid:plasma [milligrams per gram:milligrams per liter] ratios at 15 min
27 or 4 h post-dosing were 6.4,0.69, and 0.36 or 13.8, 0.93, and 0.44 at the 0.5, 14.0, or
28 280.0 mg/kg doses, respectively). These data suggest that maximal inhibition by perchlorate of
29 active uptake of iodide probably occurs below 14 mglkg potassium perchlorate (10.0 mglkg as
30 perchlorate). If perchlorate-induced inhibition of active iodide uptake is substantial, iodide still
31 may enter the thyroid by diffusion, but in a smaller amount. Likewise, if inhibition of iodide

uptake by perchlorate is incomplete, then iodide still may be actively sequestered into the thyroid,
2 again in a smaller amount. Thus, perchlorate-induced thyroid hormone perturbations may
3 plateau in adult rats dosed with perchlorate greater than approximately 5 to 10 mg/kg of
4 perchlorate (Fisher, 1998a).
5 Wolff and Maurey (1962) demonstrated the competitive nature of the perchlorate inhibition
6 in sheep thyroid tissue slices incubated at 37°C for 100 min. This study showed that the
7 Km constants for anion accumulation and the K; constants for inhibition of accumulation were
8 identical within the error of the method.
9 Eichler and Hackenthal (1962) presented perchlorate elimination data for male and female
10 Wistar rats dosed subcutaneously with 0.2, 1.0, or 6.0 ofthe 36Cl- sodium perchlorate salt
11 (Na36CIO4) per 100 g body weight (2, 10, or 60 mg/kg). The elimination curves showed nearly
12 linear, rapid excretion of perchlorate until 6 hr, at which time the curve slope started to decrease.
13 The rate of excretion increased with dose. The elimination rates of the different doses prior to
14 24 h were significantly different from each other but were similar after 24 h. Over 60 hr, 93.4 to
15 97.4% of the administered dose was recovered, again suggesting that perchlorate was not
16 metabolized.
17 In a recent review (Von Burg, 1995), perchlorate elimination curves in rats and calves were
18 described as biphasic in both species. For rats, 96% of administered perchlorate is eliminated
19 with a half-life of 1 to 2 hr. The second portion of the curve accounts for 4% ofthe dose, with
20 half-life of 72 to 80 hr. Calves have a faster overall rate of elimination, but the initial elimination
21 is slower. The first-phase half-life was 2.0 to 2.5 hr, and the second-phase half-life ranged from
22 23 to 27 hr.
23 An intravenous (iv) study performed at AFRL/HEST in Sprague-Dawley rats with
24 perchlorate to characterize its inhibition of iodide uptake supports the conclusion that there is
25 inhibition at low concentrations and there is a gradual plateau at higher concentrations (Meyer,
26 1998). Rats were dosed once by iv tail-vein injection with either 0.01, 0.1,1.0, or 3.0 mg/kg of
27 cold (i.e., not radiolabeled) ammonium perchlorate in saline. Perchlorate was administered as
28 ammonium perchlorate, and the data are presented as milligrams perchlorate per kilogram body
29 weight. Two hours after dosing with perchlorate, the rats were dosed again by iv tail-vein
125
30 injection with 33 ,ug/kg 1 dissolved in saline. Rats were sacrificed at selected times (n = 6 per
125
31 time point) up to 24 h. Total and free 1 were measured in serum, thyroid, and urine.

Perchlorate serum, thyroid, tissue, and urine analyses began in January 1999 and are reported in
2 Chapter 6. For control comparison, rats were dosed once by iv tail-vein injection with 33 ,ug/kg
3 nonradiolabeled iodide and 125 1 mixed in physiologic saline. Rats (n = 6) were sacrificed at the
4 same selected time points up to 24 hr.
5 Table 3-1 shows the percent of inhibition of 125 1 uptake as measured by bound 125 1 in the
6 thyroid. Inhibition of 1251 uptake into the thyroid by perchlorate was measured by bound or free
7 1251 in the thyroid at various time points after the single-dose of perchlorate. Because the 125 1 was
8 administered 2 hr after dosing with ammonium perchlorate, these time points correspond to 4, 8,
9 and II h after dosing. The most profound inhibitory effects were found at the 1.0- and 3.0-mg
10 perchlorate/kg dose group; however, the trend for 125 1 inhibition is evident.at the 0.01- and
11 O.I-mg/kg levels (Meyer, 1998). By 24 h (26 h after dosing with perchlorate), inhibitory effects
12 on 125 1 uptake were still observed at the 1.0- and 3.0-mg/kg dose groups.
13 Recovery of 125 1 in urine 24 hr after dosing with 1251 (26 h after ammonium perchlorate) was
14 between 79 and 88% for controll 25 1-dosed rats and perchlorate-dosed rats. The control I 251-dosed
15 rats excreted 79.5% (SD ± 5.50) of the 125 1dose over the 24-hr period; whereas, the perchlorate
16 dosed rats excreted 87% (SD ± 7.84),86% (SD ± 4.47),87.8 (SD ± 20.20) and 79.3 (SD ± 10.58)
17 of the 1251 dose in urine at the 0.01-, 0.1-, 1.0-, and 3.0-mg/kg dose levels, respectively. The
18 amount of 125 1 in serum was elevated in the perchlorate-dosed animals compared to the control
19 1251_dosed rats for up to 6 hr in all dose groups, suggesting that thyroid function was altered by
20 perchlorate and that a transient "discharge" of organified 125 1occurred as reported in studies
21 summarized in Chapter 3. Free 125 1 levels in serum were similar between perchlorate-dosed and
22 control 1251-dosed rats (Meyer, 1998). These results are consistent with those of Chow et al.
23 (1969) and Chow and Woodbury (1970). The pattern for the inhibition of iodide uptake, albeit
24 only after a single dose, is strikingly similar to the patterns shown for the thyroid hormone
25 decreases. Consequently, data on the species differences (Le., rat versus human in particular) in
26 perchlorate inhibition of the symporter will provide a basis for evaluating the degree of
27 uncertainty that should be applied when utilizing laboratory animal data as the model for humans
28 (see Chapter 7).
29 Repeated dose studies in rats (Fisher, 1998a) and in humans (Channel, 1998a) to establish
30 the kinetics of perchlorate at steady-state performed by AFRL/HEST to further characterize the
31 inhibition of iodide uptake by perchlorate are discussed in Chapter 6.

TABLE 3-1. PERCENT INHIBITION OF IODIDE UPTAKE IN THE
THYROID GLAND OF SD RATS DOSED WITH PERCHLORATE (Meyer, 1998)
Dose [Iodide] Percentage of
Time Points· (mg perchlorate/kg) (jA-g/g) Inhibition
2 hr Control b 24.4
0.01 21.3 13
0.1 18.6 24
1 7.4 70
3 2.99 88
6 hr Control b 46.5
0.01 36.7 21
0.1 32.0 31
1 19.2 59
3 9.13 80
b
9 hr Control 55
0.01 49.2 11
0.1 39.2 29
1 24.7 55
3 10.0 82
125
"Time points correspond to dosing with 1and to 4, 6, and 11 hr after dosing with ammonium perchlorate.
bDosed with only iodide (33 /.lg/kg).
3.2 IODINE METABOLISM AND THYROID PHYSIOLOGY

2 Iodine plays a central role in thyroid physiology as both a constituent of thyroid hormones
3 and a regulator of thyroid gland function. Like perchlorate, iodine is absorbed efficiently from
4 the gastrointestinal tract. Iodine in organic form is converted mostly to iodide before absorption
5 (Cavalieri, 1997). The kidneys account for about two-thirds of the iodide cleared from plasma
6 and more than 90% of the iodide cleared from the body. Sweat and breast milk account for
7 various fractions of iodide loss, and fecal elimination constitutes approximately 1% of total body
8 iodide clearance.

The thyroid gland concentrates iodide against an electrochemical gradient by a carrier
2 mediated mechanism driven by adenosine triphosphate (ATP). The activation energy required
3 for perchlorate reduction is so high that it cannot act as an oxidant under physiological conditions
4 (i.e., dilute solution, moderate temperatures, and neutral pH). Plasma membrane experiments
5 indicate that the sodium cation (Na+) and iodide cotransport are electrogenic, with a
6 thermodynamically downhill transport of approximately two Na+ ions driving one iodide ion
7 against its electrochemical gradient into the cell. The transport is sensitive to ouabain, an
8 inhibitor of ATPase. The molecule responsible for the transport of iodide has been named the
9 sodium (Nat}/iodide (1) symporter or N1S. The thyroid thus has a specialized ability to
10 concentrate iodide selectively from the surroundings where the concentration is very low (l0-8 to
II 10-7 M) and where the concentration of chloride ions is in the order of 0.0 I to 0.1 M. The
12 transport is "active," not only by electrochemical criteria, but also by metabolic ones: it does not
13 occur in the cold, it requires oxygen, and, as mentioned, it is a function of the ATP level.
14 In addition to the thyroid, other organs that can concentrate iodide include the salivary glands,
15 gastric mucosa, choroid plexus, mammary glands, and the placenta. Iodide secreted into the
16 saliva and gastric juice is reabsorbed in the small intestine (Cavalieri, 1997).
17 Nevertheless, it is essentially only in the thyroid that the newly concentrated iodide can be
18 metabolized further to form thyroid hormone; and, only in the thyroid, does TSH regulate the
19 process. Thyroid hormones play numerous and profound roles in regulating metabolism, growth,
20 development, and maintenance of homeostasis. It.is generally thought that these actions result
21 from the effects of the thyroid hormones on protein synthesis (Hill et aI., 1989).
22 Figure 3-1 shows a schematic representation of thyroid hormone biosynthesis and secretion
23 in a single thyroid follicular cell. The thyroid hormones are stored as amino acid residues in
24 thyroglobulin (Tg), a protein constituting most of the colloid in the thyroid follicles. In situ, the
25 follicular cell displays functional and structural polarity: the vascular space is at the bottom, and
26 the lumen of the follicle is at the top. The striated circle straddling the basolateral membrane
27 represents the iodide transporter. The process of thyroid hormone biosynthesis is first stimulated
28 by TSH binding to the follicular cell TSH receptor and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)
29 activation (Hard, 1998). The protein portion ofTg is synthesized on rough endoplasmic
30 reticulum (ER), and carbohydrate moieties are added by the Golgi apparatus (GA).
31 Thyroglobulin proceeds to the apical surface in secretory vesicles (small open circles) that
January 16, ,2002 3-9 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

Follicular Lumen
(Colloid)
Apical
Surface
Thyroid
Follicular
Cell
Basolateral
Membrane
Extracellular
Space
MIT
Figure 3-1. Schematic representation of thyroid hormone biosynthesis and secretion in a

single thyroid follicular cell. (Modified from Hill et aI., 1989; Cavalieri, 1997;
and Fisher, 1996.)
fuse with the cell membrane and discharge their contents into the follicular lumen. Iodide enters
2 the cell by active transport, and then, at the apical surface, is oxidized by thyroid peroxidase
3 (TPO). The hydrogen-peroxide-generating system is represented by hydrogen peroxide (H 20 2).
4 Organification occurs at or near this apical cell-colloid interface; the oxidized iodide is
5 incorporated into tyrosine residues in peptide linkage in Tg. Two iodinated tyrosyl groups couple
6 in ether linkage to form tetraiodothyronine (T4), which initially remains trapped in Tg. Hormone
7 secretion first involves pinocytosis of colloid-containing iodinated Tg (large open circle) at the
8 apical border of the follicular lumen and resolution into vesicles that fuse with lysosomes (LY,
9 dark circle). Lysosome proteolysis (striated circle) then converts Tg to amino acids, T4,

triiodothyronine (T3), diiodotyrosine (OIT) and monoiodotyrosine (MIT). lodotryosine
2 dehalogenase regenerates iodide from MIT and OIT for reuse within the thyroid or release into
3 the blood, accounting for the iodide leak in the chronic state of iodine excess in certain thyroid
4 disorders. Type I iodothyronine deiodinase converts a fraction of the free T4 to T3. Both
5 hormones (T4 and T3) are released into the blood circulation by a process that is not well
6 understood. The thyroid also releases Tg, of which some is iodinated and some uniodinated as
7 newly synthesized protein.
8 Although T4 is by far the major hormone secreted by the thyroid (typically at 8 to 10 times
9 the rate ofT3), T4 is considered a prohormone because about 33% of the T4 secreted undergoes
10 5'·deiodination to T3 in the peripheral tissues and T3 is about fourfold more potent than T4.
11 Another 40% undergoes deiodination of the inner ring to yield the inactive material, reverse
12 triiodothyronine (rT3), which recently h,as been postulated to play an inhibitory role on the
13 conversion ofT4 to T3. T3 is regarded as the active hormone because it is the form that appears
14 to activate a response by nuclear DNA. Upon entering the circulation, both T4 and T3 are bound
15 and transported in strong, but not covalent, association with plasma proteins.
16 The major plasma-protein carrier in humans is thyroxine-binding globulin, a glycoprotein
17 with a very high affinity for T4 and a lower affinity for T3. In rats, the T4 and T3 are bound to
18 prealbumin (PA) or albumin with a weaker attachment. Control ofthe circulating concentrations
19 of these hormones is regulated primarily by a negative feedback involving three organs: (1) the
20 thyroid, which produces thyroid hormone, and (2) the pituitary gland and (3) hypothalamus,
21 which respond to and help maintain optimal T3 and T41evels (Hill et aI., 1998). Figure 3-2
22 shows the schematic for this hypothalamic-pituitary-axis and the feedback mechanisms.
23 The hypothalamus stimulates the pituitary gland through thyrotropin-releasing hormone
24 (TRH) to produc.e TSH, which prompts the thyroid to produce T4 and T3. Once secreted into the
25 blood, T4 and T3 are bound to plasma proteins (thyroid-binding globulin [TBG] in humans or
26 prealbumin [PA] and albumin in rats). In addition to the aforementioned conversion ofT4 to T3
27 in peripheral tissues, thyroid hormone also is metabolized irreversibly in the liver by uridine
28 diphosphyl glucuronosyl transferases (UOPGTs) to either glucuronic (T4) or sulfate (mainly T3)
29 conjugates that are excreted in bile. A portion of the conjugated material is hydrolyzed in the
30 intestine, and the free hormones thus released are reabsorbed into the blood via enterohepatic
31 circulation. The remaining portion ofthe conjugated material is excreted in the feces.

~. . - Influences from Periphery
{~( via Nervous System
-r------....~II
()
•
Hypothalamus
(Paraventricular Nuclei)
I
I
ITRHI
(+)
+
(-) 1-------..... Pituitary
(Thyrotroph)
~(+)
,,.
"rhyroid
Thyroglobulin Plasma/Blood
.....iiiIIpoI Peroxidase ,. . ~'T ...
f~
~ ~ • 12 + Tyrosme -+DIT;+T4, T3/++---I~ T4, T3 ".:'sAG'
PP-TH
Deiodination---~~----""'" dt]
[B~~~mao
--- ----------.....------", --
',
Proteins
Proteolysis
1- Trapping Organic Binding-coupling T4, T3 Release
ThiOCyanate)
(+)
Thiourea, PTU ) loci.ide-)·
( Perchlorate Sulfonamides ( Excess
( Methimazole
Aminotrazole
1
Liver
Certain Tissues Target Tissue
UD.GTS
T4-+T3
(Nuclear Receptor)
T4·GLUC
.
Bilary
Excretion
Figure 3-2. Schematic of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis and feedback

mechanisms (pP-TH = plasma protein-thyroid hormone, PTU =
propylthiouracil, UDPGT = uridine diphosphyl glucuronosyl transferase,
T4 GLUC = T4-glucuronide conjugate). (Modified from U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1998a; Hill et aI., 1998; and Capen, 1997).

Cells in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland respond to levels of circulating T4 and T3
2 such that when thyroid production levels are high, there is a signal to reduce the output of (TRH)
3 and TSH. Similarly, when thyroid hormone levels are low, the pituitary is prompted to deliver
4 more TSH to the thyroid in order to increase the output ofT4 and T3. This negative feedback
5 loop helps the body respond to varying demands for thyroid hormone and to maintain hormone
6 homeostasis. Thus circulating T4, T3, and TSH are monitored readily in experimental animals
7 and humans and so may serve as biomarkers of exposure to and indicators of the effects from
8 agents that disrupt the status of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis (U.S. Environmental
9 Protection Agency, 1998a).
l O i n the absence of thyroid-binding globulin, as in the rat and mouse, a greater fraction of
II thyroid hormone is free of protein binding and subject to metabolism and removal from the body.
12 As a consequence, the half-life ofT4 in the rat is only about I to 24 hr, in contrast to the 6 to
13 7 day half-life in humans. Rats compensate for the increased turnover rate by secreting more
]4 TSH from the pituitary gland. Table 3-2 provides the interspecies and intraspecies differences in
15 both thyroid hormone and gland structure between rats and humans. The consequences of
16 disrupting the status of the hypothalamic-pituitary-axis will be discussed in Section 3.4.
17
]8
19 3.3 TOXICOKINETICS OF PERCHLORATE
20 Because of the complex anatomy ofthe thyroid follicle, all of the locations where
21 perchlorate inhibition is exerted remain to be established (Wolff, ]998). Perchlorate has been
22 established as a competitive inhibitor of iodide uptake across the basolateral membrane (i.e., acts
23 by the inhibition at NIS). Figure 3-3 shows a comparison ofthe molecular dimensions of
24 perchlorate and iodide. The following potency series was constructed for monovalent anion
25 based inhibition of iodide transport in thyroid slices: Tc04" ~CI04' > Re0 4' > SCN" > BF4" > I" >
26 N0 3' > Br" > CI' (Wolff, ]998). However, it is not clear whether this anion sequence, measured
27 at very high concentrations, has any mechanistic relation to what occurs at low concentrations in
28 the thyroid. It is important to determine which solution properties ofthe anions determine this
29 sequence (e.g., crystal radius, hydrated radius, hydration enthalpy, charge density). Strong base
30 anion-exchange resins (usually a large cation with a weak field) exhibit a marked preference for
31 CI04' (e.g., compared to cn; thus, it seems likely that selectivity for iodide or perchlorate in the
January ]6,2002 3-13 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

TABLE 3-2. INTERSPECIES AND INTRASPECIES DIFFERENCES IN
THYROID STRUCTURE AND T3, T4, AND TSH HORMONES
(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998a)
Parameter Human Rat

Thyroxine-binding globulin Present Essentially absent
T4 Half-life 5 to 6 Days 0.5 to I Day
T3 Half-life I Day 0.25 Day

T4 Production rate/kg body weight I x 10 x that in humans
TSH I x 6 to 60 x that in humans

Follicular cell morphology Low cuboidal Cuboidal
Sex differences
Serum TSH Ma=F" M:s: 2 xF

Cancer sensitivity F =2.5 x M M>F
aM = male, F = female.
Perchlorate (Cl0 4-): Iodide (1-):

Max. Dimension: Max. Dimension:
(xyz) = 5.420 (xyz) = 4.400
angstroms angstroms
Min. Dimension: Min. Dimension:
(xyz) = 4.724 (xyz) = 4.400
angstroms angstroms
Figure 3-3. Comparison of the molecular dimensions for the perchlorate (left) and iodide
(right) anions.
January 16,2002 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

thyroid may be based on an anion-exchange mechanism using a large cation such as a quaternary
2 amine (e.g., arginine) (Wolff, 1989).
3 Perchlorate also has been used to stimulate the efflux of iodide already stored in the
4 follicular lumen of the gland (Atterwill et aI., 1987). The exact nature ofthe mechanism for this
5 effect has not been established, however. Transport of iodide out of the cell is downhill
6 electrically, but this could be accounted for by the high concentration gradient that is established
7 from follicular lumen (iodide stored in the colloid) to the basolateral and extracellular space.
8 This may be the rate-limiting aspect for perchlorate efflux effect. Perchlorate added to the apical
9 side of a polarized thyroid cell monolayer is substantially less effective than when added to the
10 basolateral side (Wolff, 1998). Moreover, perchlorate rapidly increases the secretory response to
II TSH, and TSH increases iodide efflux before it increases iodide influx, suggesting that additional
12 control points may exist.
13 Thus, perchlorate appears to have no effect on the iodination process itself but, rather,
14 displaces iodide by competitive uptake at the NIS. Perchlorate is concentrated by thyroid tissue
15 in a manner similar to iodide, but it is not significantly metabolized in the gland nor peripherally,
16 as mentioned previously. It is not unequivocally established whether there are additional effects
17 of perchlorate on iodide transport within the thyroid. Pharmacokinetic studies with perchlorate,
18 both acute and particularly once steady state has been achieved, have provided some useful data
19 with which to gain insight on this issue. The potential impacts as health endpoints of interest for
20 human health risk assessment of this perturbation in the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis and
21 hormone economy will be discussed in Section 3.4.
22
23
24 3.4 TOXICODYNAMICS OF THYROID HORMONE PERTURBATIONS

25 Given the established mode of action for perchlorate as the inhibition of iodide uptake at
26 the NIS, it is important to distinguish the temporal aspects with respect to potential adverse tissue
27 response.
28
29 3.4.1 Carcinogenic Effects
30 In higher organisms, when demands for more thyroid hormone are small, existing thyroid
31 follicular cells can meet the demand. With increased need, as a result of certain chemical
January 16, ~002 3-15 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

exposures or iodine deficiency, the thyroid responds by increasing the size (hypertrophy) and
2 number (hyperplasia) of thyroid follicular cells to enhance hormone output. With continued TSH
3 stimulation, there is actual enlargement of the thyroid (goiter) and, at leas't in rodents, eventual
4 neoplasia of the thyroid follicular cells. Because TSH-producing pituitary cells also are
5 stimulated, they too sometimes undergo hyperplasia and neoplasia (U.S. Environmental
6 Protection Agency, 1998a; Hill et aI., 1998). The EPA Assessment of Thyroid Follicular Cell
7 Tumors (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998a), as well as reviews recommended
8 therein, provides details about thyroid follicular cell carcinogenesis. Figure 3-4 shows
9 schematically the possible antithyroid effects that could influence carcinogenesis. Note that
10 effects, not only in the thyroid but also in peripheral tissues and the liver, may cause demand on
11 thyroid hormone production such that the TSH stimulation of the thyroid to produce more
12 hormone is enlisted. Table 3-3 lists mechanisms of antithyroid-mediated neoplasia in rodents.
13 The potential for an indirect effect of perchlorate has been established, but genotoxicity
14 information was required to evaluate its potential for direct effects. As will be discussed in
15 Section 3.5, a battery of genetoxicity assays was included in the testing strategy.
16 Long-term perturbations in the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis by the various
17 influences listed in Table 3-3 are more likely to predispose the laboratory rat to a higher
18 incidence of proliferative lesions (Capen, 1997). One factor that may playa role in this
19 interspecies quantitative difference in sensitivity to thyroid stimulation is the influence of protein
20 carriers of thyroid hormones in the blood (Table 3-2). Both humans and rodents have
21 nonspecific, low-affinity protein carriers of thyroid hormones (e.g., albumin). However, in
22 humans, other primates, and dogs, there is a high-affinity binding protein, thyroxine-binding
23 globulin, which binds T4 (and T3 to a lesser degree). This protein is missing in rodents and
24 lower vertebrates. As previously indicated, T4 is bound to proteins with lower affinity in the
25 rodent and is more susceptible to removal from the blood, by metabolism, and through excretion
26 than in dogs and primates.
27 In keeping with this finding, the serum half-life ofT4 is much shorter in rats (less than
28 1 day) than it is in humans (5 to 9 days); this difference in T4 half-life results in a 10-fold greater
29 requirement for exogenous T4 in the rat with a nonfunctioning thyroid than in the adult human.
30 Serum T3 levels also show a species difference: the half-life in the rat is about 6 hr; whereas, it is
31 about 24 hr in humans. High thyroid hormone synthetic activity is demonstrated in thyroid

Thyroid Gland Peripheral Tissue
1. Partial thyroidectomy TH--+ 7. Inhibition of 5'-mono
2. Iodine deficency deiodinase
3. Inhibition of iodine pump
4. Inhibition of thyroid peroxidase
5. Toxicity to cells
6. Inhibition of TH release TH
TSH
TH/
Pituitary Gland Liver

9. Transplantation of 8. Enhance TH conjugation
THS-secreting tumor and excretion
Figure 3~4. Schematic of antithyroid effects that influence thyroid carcinogenesis. (D. S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1998a; and Hill et aI., 1998).
TABLE 3-3. MECHANISMS OF ANTITHYROID-MEDIATED
NEOPLASIA IN RODENTS (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998a).
• DNA Directed
- X rays
_ 131 1
- Genotoxic chemicals
• Indirect
- Partial thyroidectomy
- Transplantation ofTSH-secreting pituitary tumors
- Iodide deficiency
- Chemicals inhibiting iodide uptake
- Chemicals inhibiting thyroid peroxidase
- Chemicals inhibiting TH
- Chemicals inhibiting conversion ofT3 and T4
- Chemical inhibiting hepatic thyroid hormone metabolism and excretion
January 16,2002 3-17 DRAFT ~DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

follicles in rodents, where the follicles are relatively small and are surrounded by cuboidal
2 epithelium. Follicles in primates demonstrate less activity and are large with abundant colloid,
3 and follicular cells are relatively flattened (low cuboidal) (McClain, 1992).
4 The accelerated production of thyroid hormones in the rat is driven by serum TSH levels
5 that are probably about 6- to 60-fold higher than in humans. This assumes a basal TSH level in
6 rats and humans of200 ng/mL and 5 ,uU/mL, respectively, and a potency of human TSH of 1.5 to
7 15 IU/mg of hormone (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998a). Thus, it appears that the
8 rodent thyroid gland is chronically stimulated by TSH levels to compensate for the increased
9 turnover of thyroid hormones. It follows that increases in TSH levels above basal levels in rats
10 could more readily move the gland towards increased growth arid potential neoplastic change
11 than in humans. In addition to considerations about the influence of serum thyroid hormone
12 carrier proteins, there are differences between humans and laboratory animals in size and life
13 span and in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of endogenous and exogenous
14 chemicals. Any comparison of thyroid carcinogenic responses across species should be
15 cognizant of all these factors.
16 A number of goitrogenic compounds, those that either interfere with thyroid hormone
17 synthesis or secretion, have been demonstrated to result in thyroid follicular cell adenomas in
18 rats. Excessive secretion ofTSH alone has been reported to produce a high incidence of thyroid
19 follicular cell adenomas. The pathogenic mechanism of thyroid follicular cell tumor
20 development in rodents involves a sustained excessive stimulation of the thyroid by TSH. In the
21 multistage model ofthis pathogenesis, the proliferative lesions often begin as hyperplasia, may
22 proceed to the development of benign tumor (adenomas), and infrequently develop into
23 malignant tumors (Figure 3-5).
24 The precise molecular steps in the carcinogenic process leading to thyroid follicular cell
25 cancer have not been elucidated totally although significant insights into the problem have been
26 described (Farid et aI., 1994; Said et aI., 1994). Normal cell division in the thyroid seems to be
27 affected by an interplay among several mitogenic factors, namely TSH, insulin~Iike growth
28 factor-l (lOF-1), insulin, epidermal growth factor (EOF), and possibly fibroblast growth factor
29 (FOF). Additionally, other factors, such as transforming growth factor p, certain interferons, and
30 interleukin 1, may inhibit growth.
31
January 16, 2002 3-18 DRAFT~DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

Morphologic Continuum II ~
Normal
.I Hyperplasia I
I Adenoma I
I Carcinoma I
Significance in Risk Assessment
Figure 3-5. Proliferative changes involved in the multistage characterization of thyroid

follicular cell neoplasia in rodents represent a morphologic continuum.
Although these lesions typically are classified as discrete entities, the overlap in
morphologic features should be emphasized because only imprecise criteria to
separate borderline proliferative lesions exist. Thyroid neoplasia in rodents is
considered relevant to human risk assessment (U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1998a) but thought to be protective (Capen, 1997).
1 Figure 3-6 shows the possible molecular events in human thyroid follicular carcinogenesis.
2 In spite of the potential qualitative similarities, there is evidence that humans may not be as
3 sensitive quantitatively to thyroid cancer development from thyroid-pituitary disruption as are
4 rodents. Rodents readily respond to reduced iodide intake with the development of cancer;
5 whereas, humans develop profound hyperplasia with "adenomatous" changes with only
6 suggestive evidence of malignancy. Even with congenital goiters from inherited blocks in
7 thyroid hormone production, only a few malignancies have been found in humans. Thus, despite
8 a common physiology in regard to the thyroid-pituitary feedback system, the role of disruption of
9 this axis in human cancer development is much less convincing. EPA has adopted the following
10 science

Thyroid follicular cells
! TSH, insulin, IGF-1, EGF, FGF
Nodular hyperplasia I
! res, gsp Chromosome aberrations

of 5, 7, and 12
Follicular adenoma I
Loss of heterozygosity at 3p
"
I Follicular carcinoma I
p53
"
I Anaplastic carcinoma I
Figure 3-6. Possible molecular events in human thyroid follicular carcinogenesis (ras = ras
protooncogene,gsp = GTP-binding protein mutation,p53 =p53 tumor
suppressor gene) (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998a and Hill
et aI., 1998).
policy that recognizes the role of mode-of-action information regarding thyroid-pituitary

2 disruption and mutagenesis to potential thyroid carcinogenesis (U.S. Environmental Protection
3 Agency, 1998a).
4 • It is presumed that chemicals that produce rodent thyroid tumors may pose a carcinogenic
5 hazard for the human thyroid.
6 • In the absence of chemical-specific data, humans and rodents are presumed to be equally
7 sensitive to thyroid cancer caused by thyroid-pituitary disruption. This is a conservative
8 position when thyroid-pituitary disruption is the sole mode of action because rodents appear to
9 be more sensitive to this carcinogenic mode-of-action than are humans. When the thyroid
10 carcinogen is a mutagenic chemical, the possibility that children may be more sensitive than
11 adults needs to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

• Adverse rodent noncancer thyroid effects (e.g., thyroid enlargements) following short- and
2 long-term reductions in thyroid hormone levels are presumed to pose human noncancer health
3 hazards.
4 The new data on the antithyroid activity of perchlorate that has resulted from the testing
5 strategy will be evaluated in Chapter 7 according to criteria provided in the guidance (U.S.
6 Environmental Protection Agency, 1998a) to determine the likelihood that the chemical would
7 act indirectly, via disruption of the thyroid-pituitary axis, or directly on DNA.
8
9 3.4.2 Neurodevelopmental Deficits and Other Potential Adverse Effects
10 Resulting from Thyroid Hormone Disruption
II As expressed by the external review panel convened by Toxicology Excellence for Risk
12 Assessment (TERA) in 1997, there was concern about other potential adverse effects of
13 perchlorate-induced hypothyroidism. Humans respond as do experimental animals in regard to
14 short- and mid-term disturbances in thyroid functioning from various anti-thyroid stimuli such as
131
15 iodide deficiency, partial thyroidectomy (surgically or 1- induced), and goitrogenic chemicals
16 such as thionamides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998a). For instance, thyroid
17 hormone is critical to normal brain and physical development. This dependency begins in the
18 uterus and extends to 3 years of age in humans. Thus, there was concern that hypothyroidism
19 during pregnancy could result in neurodevelopmental effects.
20 The role ofthe placenta in thyroid hormone metabolism is shown in Figure 3-7. Although
21 the fetus is initially dependent on maternal thyroid hormone levels, the potential for disruption of
22 fetal hormone production remains once the fetal thyroid assumes this function because
23 perchlorate can cross the placenta. Disruption of circulating thyroid hormones can have
24 drastically different effects on fetuses and infants than on adults, depending on the developmental
25 stage at exposure (Table 3-4). It is important to emphasize that even transient disruption may
26 lead to permanent effects in the developing organism.
27 Chemical-induced alterations in thyroid hormone homeostasis are known to adversely
28 affect the development of many organ systems, including the nervous and reproductive systems
29 (Porterfield, 1994; Jannini et aI., 1995). Severe developmental hypothyroidism caused by iodine
30 deficiencies or a congenital condition has devastating effects on fetal and postnatal development,
31 including mental deficiencies and hearing, speech, and motor deficits (Porterfield, 1994; Sher
January 16, .2002 3-21 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

Mother Placenta . Fetus
+TBG
... Estrogens
+T4 ~
+T3
+T4 .... ......
~
hCG
+TSH
Iodine
...
TRH .: TRH
TRH .....
TSH
rT3
T4
" .....
\..v
I
rT3
...
... tT3
......
T4
...
T3 I\.. T2 ......
T3
...
PTU
....
Methimazole ...
CIO 4 ...
Figure 3-7. Schematic representation of the role of the placenta in thyroid hormone
metabolism during human pregnancy. The placenta produces estrogens and
heG that increase maternal TBG levels and stimulate maternal thyroid
hormone production, respectively. Both activities tend to increase maternal
T4 and T3 concentrations and to inhibit maternal TSH secretion. Iodide and
TRH readily cross the placenta, and the placenta itself synthesizes TRH., The
placenta is impermeable to TSH and only partially permeable to T4 and T3.
Placental Type III iodothyronine monodeiodinase enzymes degrade T4 to rT3
and T3 to 3,3'-diiodothyronine (T2). Propylthiouracil and methimazole
readily cross the placenta. Given its physicochemical characteristics and
similarity to iodide, perchlorate also is anticipated to cross readily. (Modified
from Fisher, 1996 and Underwood, 1998).

TABLE 3-4. MAIN SYMPTOMS AND EFFECTS OF HYPOTHYROIDISM
Developmental Adult
(Transient disruption leads to permanent effects.) (Transient disruption leads to transient effects.)
• Delayed reflex ontogeny • Run down, slow, depressed

• Impaired fine motor skills • Sluggish, cold, tired
• Deaf-mutism, spasticity • Dryness and brittleness of hair
• Gait disturbances • Dry and itchy skin, constipation
• Mental retardation • Muscle cramps
• Speech impairments • Increased menstrual flow
• Thyroid tumors in rodents
et aI., 1998). It is important to emphasize that these effects are caused by a lack of thyroid
2 hormones alone, rather than by tumor development or thyroid hypertrophy/hyperplasia due to
3 increases in TSH. Thus, the important species comparison may be perchlorate's action of iodide
4 uptake inhibition at the NIS. In fact, data discussed in Chapters 5 and 6 show that the sensitivity
5 of the NIS is quite similar across species.
6 During development, thyroid hormones regulate cell proliferation, migration, and
7 differentiation. Intracellularly, THs bind to thyroid hormone receptors that interact with thyroid
8 response elements to alter expression of messenger ribonucleic acids (mRNAs) and subsequent
9 protein synthesis. The pituitary-thyroid TSH feedback loop mayor may not be activated during
10 development, depending on the mechanism of action of the chemical. The adversity of
11 congenital hypothyroidism, usually less severe than endemic cretinism, can be ameliorated via
12 early postnatal thyroxine therapy. In contrast, the effects of developmental iodine deficiency can
13 not be corrected with only postnatal therapy, indicating that iodine deficiency during pregnancy
14 is the causative action (Cao et aI., 1994). Clearly, xenobiotics that contribute to fetal or maternal
15 hypothyroidism or hypothyroxenemia are of concern.
16 Since the previous external peer review, studies reported in the clinical and epidemiological
17 literature have reinforced concerns for deficits in neuropsychological development related to
18 maternal thyroid deficiency. Haddow et al. (1999) showed an effect on IQ scores in children
19 (ages seven to nine) who had normal thyroid function at birth but were born to women with
20 abnormal thyrotropin levels versus children born to a matched cohort of women with normal
21 thyrotropin levels as controls. Haddow et al. (1999) concluded that even mild and probably

asymptomatic hypothyroidism in pregnant women can adversely affect their children's
2 subsequent performance on neuropsychological tests.
3 Pop et al. (1995) noted an average impairment of 10.5 IQ points in the offspring of mothers
4 with high thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPO·Ab) titers during pregnancy. In a later prospective
5 study these same researchers evaluated developmental indices at 3 weeks, 10 months, I and
6 2 years of age and demonstrated that a maternal free T4 blood level that was less than the lOth
7 percentile of first trimester values (lOA pmol/L in their study series) was associated with
8 distinctly impaired psychomotor development whether or not TSH and TPO-Abs were elevated
9 (Pop, et aI., 1999). Smit et aI. (2000) reported a similar relationship between free T4 and early
10 neurodevelopment of children born from treated hypothyroid women.
II Morreale de Escobar et aI. (2000) evaluated epidemiological, clinical, and basic research
12 data to ascertain ifthe principal factor leading to neurodevelopmental deficits in children was
13 related to maternal hypothyroidism, whether clinical or subclinical (as defined by TSH higher
14 than the 98 th percentile of the normal population); or if they were instead related to maternal
15 hypothyroxinemia per se (decrement in T4 without concomitant increase in TSH). These
16 researchers concluded that conditions resulting in hypothyroxinemia alone (a low for gestational
17 age circulating maternal free T4 level whether or not TSH was increased) poses an increased risk
18 for poor neuropsychological development of the fetus. T4 is the required substrate for the
19 ontogenically-regulated generation ofT3 in the amounts needed for optimal brain development,
20 both temporally and spatially. Normal maternal T3 concentrations did not seem to prevent the
21 potential damage of a low T4 supply (Morreale de Escobar et aI., 2000). Hypothyroxinemia
22 seems to be much more frequent in pregnant women than either clinical or subclinical
23 hypothyroidism and autoimmune thyroid disease (AlTO), especially in regions where the iodine
24 intake of the pregnant woman is inadequate to meet her increased needs for T4 (Morreale de
25 Escobar et aI., 2000).
26 Figure 3-8 illustrates the windows of susceptibility for insults to the brain resulting from
27 hypothyroxinemia. A similar map has been developed for rats, and time lines have begun to be
28 compared and correlated (Rice and Barone, 2000), as shown in Figure 3-9. Morreale de Escobar
29 et aI. (2000) reported findings that altered early migration of cortical cells can be observed in rats
30 with severe iodine deficiency. Porterfield (2000) has also discussed the potential for

-------- -
iodine-deficiency cretinism
mixed neurological and hypothyroid manifestations
neurological myxedematous
. maternal thyroidal autoantibodies congenital hypothyroidism

I
cerebral cortex
o 23456 7
••
8 tBirth (term)
Gestational age in six months
-~~
Prematurity
Figure 3-8. Approximate timing of major insults to tbe brain resulting from
hypothyroxinemia, superimposed on major neurodevelopmental events in
humans. Conditions resulting in early maternal hypothyroxinemia, combined
to later impairment of the fetal thyroid, are the most damaging, with central
nervous system (CNS) damage that is irreversible at birth. The most frequent
cause is maternal iodine deficiency (ID) and the presence of maternal
autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD). Unless In is also present, the CNS
damage in congenital hypothyroidism is preventable by early postnatal
treatment because the normal maternal thyroxinemia has avoided damage to
the brain until birth. If maternal hypothyroxinemia persists, normal maternal
concentrations of T 3 do not protect the fetal brain because of its dependence
on intracerebral regulation oflocal T 3 availability by deiodinati-ng pathways
using T 4 as a substrate. Interruption of the contribution of maternal T 4 in
premature infants with an immature thyroid may also underlie their increased
risk of neurodevelopmental problems, the more severe the earlier their birth.
The question mark indicates that it is unknown whether very early CNS
development, corresponding to a period when the general morphogenesis of
the pros encephalon (neurolation and segmentation) is being determined, is
thyroid hormone sensitive or not (Morreale de Escobar et aI., 2000).

,---------------------------------~~---
I
I
I
I
I
I Adolescence ..
I PND 15 PND 35-45
I Neurulation
Proliferation and migratio~

I f
Dmerantiation and synaPtogen~sis
I
!
Apoptosis
Gliogenesis
!
(A) Myelination
Cell Migration
SUbplate Synapse
(B) proliferation of
neurons neurons
formation
Myelination
0 Radial glia Brain and Marginal. :a
-
'iii"
.l:
c:
0
.§.
1
2
3
and neurons
~o~
zone
I
Subpial•
I
~
~
I !.,
,I
'0 4 +
0
.~
5 Hippocampus
"mg
8- ~ ~ E
:;c: 6
7
"
Reticular
formation
co
]
~
il:' +
§
I' ~
I!!
Q.
8
9 Gila
External
granular
Visual
i rt
\"
i
a::: 1 1
E ""
j
e U
III
Gl
.,:,
1
2 V
Layer
ceraballum ~ i
l i
~
~~
Association <=
'0 3 cortex ~
0 <=
"i5..
'C
8-
4
~ en
'0
~ ~
5
~
-
III
c:
1II
0
Q.
10
Figure 3-9. Timelines of developmental processes in the nervous system of rats (a) and
humans (b). Rat timeline is compared to timing of fertilization, organogenesis,
and histogenesis. Human perinatal period is scaled in months and the '
postnatal development is scaled in years (Rice and Barone, 2000).

neurotoxicity and altered brain development that may result from exposure to environmental
2 chemicals that disrupt thyroid function even on a transient basis.
3 These concerns for the potential adverse effects of perchlorate on T4 and T3, especially
4 during pregnancy, are compounded by the growing appreciation that women of childbearing age
5 have relatively low iodide intake. A January 2001 report by the National Academy of Sciences
6 (NAS) concerning the dietary reference intake oftrace-mineral nutrients, including iodine,
7 indicated that less than 25% of the total population was below the estimated average requirement
8 for iodide and stressed a need to look at levels of adequacy for susceptible age groups and status
9 during pregnancy and lactation. The higher requirements during this time indicate a potential
10 susceptibility as shown in Table 3-5. The NAS also cautions against using urinary iodine as a
11 biomarker for iodine status unless the data are from 24-hour collections or are normalized against
12 creatinine. Other reports suggest that the level of iodide intake is less than a third of the range
13 recommended for pregnant women by the World Health Organization (WHO) (Caron et aI.,
14 1997).
15
16
TABLE 3-5. DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKES (DRI) FOR IODIDE
(National Academy of Sciences, 2001)
Estimated Average Recommended Dietary
Adequate Intake (AI) Requirement (EAR) Allowance (RDA)
Age or Status ~g/day ,Ltg/day ~g/day
0-6 months 110

6-12 months 130
1-3 years 65 90
4-8 years 65 90
9-13 years 73 120
14-18 years 95 ISO
19-15 years 95 150
51 + years 95 150
Pregnancy 160 220
Lactation 209 290
January 16,,2002 3-27 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

1 The prevalence of abnormal thyroid function continues to be debated and this is
2 confounded by the variable definitions of the disease state as well as the different measures of
3 thyroid function (Canaris et aI., 2000). Most reports are still defined by TSH levels rather than
4 for hypothyroxinemia per se, but recent presentations suggest that TSH is a poor test to assess the
5 severity oftissue hypothyroidism (Meier et aI., 2001), and recommendations in the epidemiologic
6 literature are proposing that screening of pregnant women should include the determination of
7 free T4 (Morreale de Escobar et aI., 2000). Age, sex and dietary iodine levels are confounding
8 factors, although virtually all studies report higher prevalence rates for hypothyroidism
9 (as defined by increased TSH) in women with age (Canaris et al., 2000). Rates as high as 24%
10 among women older than 60 years have been reported. Suppressed TSH levels have been
11 associated with decreased bone density, increased risk of atrial fibrillation, premature atrial beats,
12 and effects on serum lipids notably elevated serum cholesterol levels.
13 Together these findings strongly suggest that a susceptible population of particular concern
14 for perchlorate exposure is pregnant women with hypothyroxinemia and that the iodine
15 deficiency represents an additional potential insult that could exacerbate the effects of perchlorate
16 toxicity. The elderly, especially women, represent another potentially susceptible population, as
17 well as people with cardiac dysfunction or risk factors such as elevated serum cholesterol.
18 As mentioned above, reproductive toxicity was also a concern as a potential effect of
19 perchlorate's mode of action. In females, thyroid hormones appear to have a role in stimulating
20 the onset of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) production by the placenta early in pregnancy.
21 Human chorionic gonadotropin is essential for the maintenance of pregnancy. Therefore, a
22 hypothyroid condition has potential to interfere with normal placental function and fetal
23 survival, as well as the potential to interfere with lactation. Suppression of thyroid hormone
24 secretion with radioactive iodine or goitrogens reduces milk yield in lactating animals. This
25 effect may be caused by suppression of placental lactogen production. Thyroid-releasing
26 hormone is known to playa role in prolactin release during the estrous cycle. Additionally, the
27 thyroid is necessary for the transition to the anestrus state in seasonally breeding species.
28 In summary, effects on thyroid hormone levels have roles in estrous cycle regulation, pregnancy
29 maintenance, fetal growth, and lactation.
30 In males, the primary effects of hypothyroidism appear to occur during testicular
31 development. The testis is responsive to thyroid hormones only during a limited time during the

perinatal and prepubertal periods. Thyroid honnone is a major regulator of seminiferous
2 epithelium development by inducing the nonnal differentiation of Sertoli cells, gonocytes, and
3 Leydig cells, and by limiting the proliferation of those cell types. In the hypothyroid condition,
4 those cells proliferate beyond the nonn, and the steroidogenic function of the Leydig cells, on a
5 per-cell basis (but not necessarily in total), is impaired. Secretory activity of the Sertoli cells also
6 appears to be impaired. In boys, untreated hypothyroidism is associated with marked and
7 precocious testis enlargement, but low androgen activity. In a small study, hypothyroid men had
8 complaints of reduced libido that was probably related to a defective leutenizing honnone
9 response to gonadotropin-releasing honnone.
10 The inclusion of an immunological evaluation of mice exposed to perchlorate was
11 warranted because of evidence from earlier clinical studies that indicated a link between the
12 treatment of Graves' disease with perchlorates and serious hematological effects that may be
13 linked to immune mechanisms. A small number of patients undergoing perchlorate therapy have
14 been reported to develop aplastic anemia, agranulocytosis, lymphadenopathy, leukopenia, or skin
15 rashes. The antithyroid drugs propylthiouracil and methimazoles are reported to exert their
16 effects on the hematopoietic system through immune mechanisms. Because the use of these
17 antithyroid drugs by a small number of patients also resulted in sequelae similar to that of some
18 patients under perchlorate treatment, it has been postulated that perchlorate also may act via the
19 immune system.
20
21
22 3.5 DEVELOPMENT OF A TOXICITY TESTING STRATEGY BASED

23 ON MODE OF ACTION
24 Because the RID is intended to be a lifetime dose-response estimate, the typical objective
25 of a database to support such a quantitative assessment is to evaluate a comprehensive array of
26 testing endpoints that represent various life stages during which potential effects could occur
27 (e.g., the developing fetus through adult) and for effects on reproductive capability (shown
28 schematically in Figure 3-10). As discussed in the previous sections, thyroid honnone
29 deficiencies, such as those induced by perchlorate, can affect normal metabolism, growth, and
30 development. No robust data existed prior to this time to evaluate other potential target tissues or
31 effects. There were limited data on effects caused by long-tenn exposures and no data with

~
itt. . .~
• ;..•;.. .,. i'. . .':;t'l~
. '1,j •
...
Reproductive
Developmental General Toxicity
Figure 3-10. Schematic illustrating that a high confidence RID is based on data that
address all potentially critical stages over a lifetime.
which to evaluate the effects of perchlorate in potentially susceptible populations such as in

2 developing fetuses, nor were there data on the effects of perchlorate on the reproductive capacity
3 of male or female laboratory animals. Table 3-6 shows the minimum database for derivation of
4 an RID with low confidence (a 90-day bioassay) and the rationale for other tests typically
5 included to bolster the confidence in the derivation-the same suite of tests that has been
6 discussed for perchlorate. These data typically also reduce the uncertainty for which uncertainty
7 factors are applied (see Table 3-7), either because the absence of data on a suspected endpoint
8 (e.g., developmental toxicity) has been addressed or because mechanistic data provide insight on
9 the relevance of the laboratory animal model, including the magnitude of interspecies and
10 intrahuman variability in toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics. Any individual chemical database
11 may fall in between this range of high and low certainty, depending on the quality of the
12 individual studies and whether the dose response for suspected endpoints is characterized well.
13 The objective of the testing strategy was to provide a comprehensive database that
14 described the mode-of-action-based pathogenesis in quantitative terms so that the resultant
IS estimate could be more predictive and ultimately support the development of a robust RID
16 estimate that reduced the uncertainties inherent in the provisional, presumably protective values
17 (see Figure 3-11).
18

r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -.. . ~----.-.-
TABLE 3-6. MINIMUM DATABASE FOR DERIVATION OF AN

ORAL REFERENCE DOSE
Mammalian Database' Confidence Comments
Two chronic oral bioassays in different Minimum database for high confidence
species
One two-generation reproductive study
Two developmental toxicity studies in
different species
One subchronic oral bioassay Low Minimum database for estimation of an RID
"Rationale is to use different species to evaluate variability in species sensitivity unless a particular laboratory
animal model is more appropriate.
bRationale is to address all potentially critical life stages.
TABLE 3-7. FACTORS FOR UNCERTAINTIES IN APPLIED EXTRAPOLATIONS

USED TO DERIVE REFERENCE DOSES·
10H - Human to sensitive human
10A - Experimental animal to human
lOs - Subchronic to chronic duration
lO L - LOAEL(HEE)" to NOAEL(HEE)"
10D - Incomplete to complete database
MF - Modifying factor. Professional assessment of scientific uncertainties of the study and database not
explicitly addressed above. Default for the MF is 1.0 (e.g., applied for small sample size or poor
exposure characterization).
"HEE == human equivalent exposure.
1 As illustrated in Figure 3-11, it is ultimately desirable to have a comprehensive

2 biologically-based dose-response model that incorporates the mechanistic determinants of
3 chemical disposition, toxicant-target interactions, and tissue responses integrated into an overall
4 quantitative model of the pathogenesis (Jarabek, 1995a). Because the internal tissue dose of the
5 chemical or its toxic moiety in a target tissue is not always proportional to the applied dose of a
6 compound, emphasis has been placed on the need to distinguish clearly between the exposure
7 concentration and the dose to critical target tissues. Consequently, the term "exposure-dose
8 response" has been recommended as more accurate and comprehensive (Andersen et a\., 1992).
9 This expression refers, not only to the determination of the quantitative relationship between
10 exposure concentrations and target tissue dose, but also to the relationship between tissue dose
11 and the observed or expected responses in laboratory animals and humans. The process of
January 16, 2002 3-31 DRAFT-DO 1'10T QUOTE OR CITE

Chemical Toxicological
Exposure "Dose"
Concentration Response
Protective Exposure • ...- ...- -•.,~ Response Qualitative
Exposure • ...- - - -...~ Response

, Mechanisms,
T
Disposition Models
Exposure ......-..... Response
, Mechanisms,
T
Disposition Models
Predictive Exposure ., Tissue

Dose
J .. T¥i~;~~t J
Interaction
• Response Quantitative
, Mechanisms, , Mechanisms • Mechanisms J
T T T
Disposition Models Toxicant-Target Models TIssue Response Models
Figure 3-11. Schematic characterization of comprehensive exposure-dose-response

continuum and the evolution of protective to predictive dose-response
estimates (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1994 and Jarabek 1995b).
1 determining the exposure-dose-response continuum is achieved by linking the mechanisms or

2 critical biological factors that regulate the OCCUITence of a particular process and the nature of the
3 interrelationships among these factors. This can be especially important for interspecies
4 extrapolation and to understanding intrahuman variability.
5 Dose-response estimates based on characterization of the exposure-dose-response
6 continuum at the rudimentary ("black box") level necessarily incorporate large uncertainty
7 factors to ensure that the estimates are protective in the presence of substantial data gaps. With
8 each progressive level, incorporation and integration of mechanistic determinants allow
9 elucidation ofthe exposure-dose-response continuum and, depending on the knowledge of model
10 parameters and fidelity to the biological system, a more accurate characterization of the
11 pathogenesis process (Jarabek, 1995a). Because of the increase in accuracy of the
12 characterization with each progressive level, dose-response estimates also progress from more
13 protective to factually-based (predictive).
January 16,2002 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

J
Eight new studies were recommended as part of the original testing strategy after the May
2 1997 external peer review to provide such a comprehensive array of endpoints. These studies are
3 described below along with the role they were anticipated to play in informing the revised health
4 risk assessment (see Table 3-8).
5
6
TABLE 3-8. PERCHLORATE PEER REVIEW RECOMMENDED
STUDIES SUMMARY
Study Description Potential Use in Assessment
90-Day subchronic bioassay Tests for other target tissues; Minimum database for RID dose
+ TH a + reproductivity + evaluates effect on TH in young adult response for TH in young adult rats;
genotoxicity + recovery rats; reproductive parameters added; additional information on others; may
mouse micronuclei and a recovery allow decrease in uncertainty factor
group (UF) for database deficiencies
Developmental Evaluates nervous system in fetal and Potentially critical effect; comparison of
neurotoxicity + TH postnatal rats; TH in does developmental versus adult effects on
(PO-generation) and pups TH .
(F I-generation)
Developmental study + TH Evaluates birth defects in rabbits; Potentially critical effect; data in second
TH in does at end of gestation species for TH effects; may reduce UF
for database deficiencies
Two-Generation Evaluates fertility of adult rats and Potentially critical effect; may reduce
reproductive !oxicity + TH toxicity in offspring over two UF for database deficiencies
generations; TH in parents
(FO-generation) and offspring
(FI- and F2-generations)
ADME studies Characterize absorption, distribution, Interspecies extrapolation
metabolism, and elimination in rats
and humans; iodine inhibition and
perchlorate kinetices and hormone
homeostasis
Mechanistic studies Evaluate mechanism ofTH response Interspecies extrapolation; determine

and sensitivity in rats and humans susceptible subpopulation
Genotoxicity assays Test for toxicity to DNA Mode-of-action information for thyroid
neoplasia; may reduce UF for database
deficiencies
Immunotoxicity Evaluates immune system structure Potentially critical effect; may reduce
and function UP for database deficiencies
aThyroid hormones (T4 and T3); Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), a pituitary hormone, was also assayed in
those studies.
January 16,,2002 3-33 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

(1) 90-Day Subchronic Oral Bioassay Study. This study was considered the minimum data
2 requirement for derivation of an oral RID. The study aimed to identify other target tissues,
3 to test young adult rats, and to provide data on the effect of repeated exposure to perchlorate
4 on thyroid hormone levels. The 30-day recovery phase, i.e., evaluation ofthe thyroid status
5 30 days after perchlorate was stopped, would provide data necessary to characterize its
6 anti-thyroid effects with respect to carcinogenicity (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
7 1998a). These data were collected to allow reduction ofthe uncertainty factor applied for
8 database deficiencies.
9
10 (2) Developmental Neurotoxicity Study. This study was designed to evaluate the potential for
II developmental neurotoxicity of perchlorate by assessing functional and morphological
12 endpoints in offspring from the mother exposed during pregnancy and lactation.
13 Neurotoxicity endpoints were likely to be a critical effect, and the developing organism a
14 sensitive subpopulation. It was hoped that these data would allow reduction of the
15 uncertainty factors applied for intrahuman variability and database deficiencies.
16
17 (3) Segment II Developmental Study. This study was conducted to evaluate the potential for
18 perchlorate to cause birth defects in rabbits and to evaluate a potentially critical effect and
19 subpopulation. This study also was conducted to provide data on the thyroid hormone
20 effects in a second species (in addition to rats). These data might allow reduction of the
21 uncertainty factor applied for database deficiencies.
22
23 (4) Two-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study. This study was designed to evaluate the
24 potential for perchlorate to cause deficits in reproductive performance in adult rats and for
25 toxicity in the young offspring. The primary goal of this study was to identify a potentially
26 critical effect and to allow for reduction of the uncertainty factor applied for database
27 deficiencies.
28
29 (5) Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Elimination Studies. These ADME studies
30 aimed to understand the pharmacokinetics (i.e., how perchlorate is absorbed, distributed,
31 metabolized, and excreted) of perchlorate in test animals and humans. These data were to

provide information to support construction of quantitative extrapolation of dose across
2 species (e.g., rat to human).
3
4 (6) Perchlorate Mechanism Studies. These studies provided a link to the pharmacokinetic
5 studies and were conducted via a comparison of existing literature and of new in vitro and
6 in vivo data that evaluated the effects of perchlorate on the iodide uptake mechanism across
7 species to aid in the quantitative extrapolation of dose.
8
9 (7) Genotoxicity Assays. These studies evaluated the potential for carcinogenicity by
10 evaluating mutations and toxic effects on DNA. These data were useful to determining
11 whether the benign thyroid tumors were likely to be a result of the proposed threshold
12 pathogenesis process.
13
14 (8) Immunotoxicity Studies. These studies were planned to evaluate the potential for
15 perchlorate to disrupt immune function and identify a potentially critical effect. These data
16 would help to reduce the uncertainty factor applied for database deficiencies. Because
17 concern was raised for these potential adverse effects based on the previous clinical
18 experience with treatment of Graves' disease patients, these studies were considered
19 necessary to a comprehensive database for perchlorate.
20
21 In the 1998 external review draft (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998d), a model
22 based on mapping the events of the mode of action for perchlorate was proposed as shown in
23 Figure 3-12. The key event was identified as the inhibition of iodide uptake at the NIS, followed
24 by decreases in thyroid hormones and increases in TSH. Both the potential neurodevelopmental
25 and neoplastic sequelae ofthis perturbation in thyroid hormone economy were proposed as
26 downstream adverse health outcomes. The conceptual model was endorsed by the external peer
27 review panel in 1999 (Research Triangle Institute, 1999), and additional studies were
28 recommended to reevaluate indications of developmental and neurodevelopmental in rats for
29 effects observed in the 1998 database. Delineating the continuum of histopathological changes
30 in the thyroid was also recommended. The results of all the studies in the testing strategy (both
31

I
Effect
Exposure
Noncancer Cancer
8
Early Altered
Internal Clinical Prognostic
~ Biological ~ Structure I ~
Exposure ~'-----:lr--""'"
_ Dose Effect Function
Disease Significance
.. .. .....
•• Children's Health
..
••
.. . Risk
' ~ : ~
Human Health
Risk
~..
.
.. .. ,
.. .. ..
..
Susceptibility
Figure 3-12. Mode-of-action,model for perchlorate toxicity proposed by the U.S. EPA
(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998d). Schematic shows the
exposure-dose-response continuum considered in the context of biomarkers
(classified as measures of exposure, effect, and susceptibility) and level of
organization at which toxicity is observed (U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1994; Schulte, 1989). The model maps the toxicity of perchlorate on
this basis by establishing casual linkage or prognostic correlations of
precursor lesions.
"old" 1998 and "new" 2001), as well as additional studies now available in the literature, will be
2 reported together with EPA's interpretation and evaluation in Chapter 5.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2
3
4 The purposes ofthis document is to present an assessment that updates previous
5 provisional values issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for an oral
6 reference dose (RID) for perchlorate and revises the assessment previously released as a draft
7 external review document (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998d). The objective of this
8 assessment is to derive a human health risk estimate, based on all evaluation of its potential to
9 cause toxicity or cancer, and to provide a screening-level ecological risk assessment for
10 perchlorate based on all toxicity data that recently have become available to the Agency as of fall
I1 2001. Another important objective was to evaluate the evidence for indirect exposures, Le.,
12 those exposures not by direct ingestion of contaminated water. This revised assessment
13 incorporates data from new studies and analyses in response-level to recommendations made at a
14 previous peer review ofthe 1998 draft (Research Triangle Institute, 1999). Most ofthese data
15 were obtained as results of a testing strategy that was designed with knowledge of the mode of
16 action for perchlorate toxicity that identified major data gaps in the data available prior to 1997.
17 This executive summary concisely presents key findings from the present assessment.
18
19 SUMMARY FINDINGS
20 Sources of Perchlorate Contamination and Occurrence
2I • Perchlorate is an oxidizing anion that originates as a contaminant in ground and surface waters
22 from the dissolution of ammonium, potassium, magnesium, or sodium salts. Perchlorate is
23 exceedingly mobile in aqueous systems and can persist for many decades under typical ground
24 and surface water conditions'.
25 • Ammonium perchlorate is manufactured for use as the oxidizer component and primary
26 ingredient in solid propellant for rockets, missiles, and fireworks. Because it is a reducing
27 agent, it can undergo a variety of intramolecular redox reactions that lead to the release of
28 gaseous products. Through such reactions, it acts as a thrust booster.
29 • Perchlorate salts are also used on a large scale as a component of air bag inflators. Perchlorate
30 salts are also used in nuclear reactors and electronic tubes, as additives in lubricating oils, in
January 16, 2002 E-1 Draft-Do Not Quote or Cite

tanning and finishing leather, as a mordant for fabrics and dyes, in electroplating, in aluminum
2 refining, and in rubber manufacture, as a mordant for fabrics and dyes, and in the production of
3 paints and enamels. Chemical fertilizer had been reported to be a potential source of
4 perchlorate contamination, but new investigations by the Agency have determined that this is
5 not an issue for agricultural applications.
6 • Large-scale production of perchlorate-containing chemicals in the United States began in the
7 mid-1940s. Because of its shelf life, perchlorate must be washed out of the United States'
8 missile and rocket inventory to be replaced with a fresh supply. Thus, large volumes have been
9 disposed of in various states since the 1950s.
10 • Perchlorate began to be discovered at various manufacturing sites and in well water and
11 drinking water supplies within the months following the April 1997 development of an ion
12 chromatography analytical method that achieved a method detection limit (MDL) of
13 approximately 1 ppb and a minimum reporting limit (MRL) of 4 ppb. There are 20 states with
14 confirmed releases in ground or surface water. There are 40 states that have confirmed
15 perchlorate manufacturers or users based on EPA Information Request responses.
16 In California, most of the locations where perchlorate has been detected are associated with
17 facilities that have manufactured or tested solid rocket fuels for the Department of Defense or
18 the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
19 • To date, there has not been a systematic national survey of perchlorate occurrence and a
20 National Primary Drinking Water Regulation for perchlorate does not currently exist.
21 Perchlorate was placed on the Contaminant Candidate List (CCL) in March 1998. The CCL
22 lists priority contaminants (defined as either known or anticipated to occur in public water
23 systems) in need of research, guidance development, regulatory determinations, or monitoring
24 by the states. Perchlorate was listed as a contaminant that required additional research and
25 occurrence information before regulatory determinations could be considered.
26 • Perchlorate was placed on the Unregulated Contaminants Monitoring Rule (UCMR) in March
27 1999 (Federal Register, 1999) to gather needed exposure information. Under the UCMR, all
28 large public water systems and a representative sample of small public water systems were
29 required to monitor for perchlorate beginning in January 2001. This effort does not extend to
30 investigating potential sources in ground and surface water that have not migrated into public .
31 water supplies. Identification ofthe magnitude and extent of perchlorate occurrence in the
January 16,2002 E-2 Draft-Do Not Quote or Cite

environment is important in assessing the routes of exposure to humans and for determining the
2 different types of organisms and ecosystems that may be affected.
3 • In early 2000, an analytical method to detect perchlorate in drinking water (EPA Method 314.0)
4 using ion chromatography was published as a direct final rule (Federal Register, 2000). The
5 EPA Method 314.0 was also approved as a monitoring method for the UCMR (Federal
6 Resister, 2000). The MDL for the method is 0.53 ppb and the MRL is 4 ppb. Improvements
7 developed commercially in the analytical capabilities may lower the MRL to the sub-part per
8 billion level in the near future.
9 • Adequate exposure characteristics of transport and transformation in the environment are also
10 absent. Preliminary biotransport studies at six contaminated sites indicate a potential for
11 uptake into plant and animal tissues in ecosystems. Extension of analytical methods to detect
12 perchlorate in plant and animal tissues awaits validation before a conclusive determination can
13 be made.
14
15 An Integrated Approach to Comprehensive Risk Characterization
16 • Perchlorate is of concern for several reasons. First, there were uncertainties in the toxicological
17 database available that could be used to evaluate the potential for perchlorate to produce human
18 health effects when present at low levels in drinking water. The purpose of the targeted
19 toxicity testing strategy was to develop a database to address key data gaps. Secondly, the
20 actual extent of the occurrence of perchlorate in ground and surface waters is not known at this
21 time. Additionally, the efficacy of different treatment technologies for various water uses (such
22 as drinking water or agricultural applications) and different scales (i.e., large or small volumes)
23 is still being determined. Finally, the extent and nature of ecological impact or transport and
24 transformation phenomena in various environmental media have only, as yet, been studied
25 superficially.
26 • To adequately and comprehensively characterize the risks posed by perchlorate contamination
27 and to develop scientifically-based management strategies that effectively mitigate the potential
28 risks posed by perchlorate contamination, several advances are essential. The analytical
29 methods used to characterize various exposures must be accurate and precise. The exposure
30 estimates cannot be gauged with respect to their risk unless robust health and ecological risl<.
31 estimates are available. Treatment technologies should be targeted to levels of concern and
January 16, .2002 E-3 Draft-Do Not Quote or Cite

tailored to the intended water use. Technology transfer is necessary so that all affected parties
2 and concerned citizens a,re apprised of accurate and reliable infonnation that is up to date with
3 the evolving state ofthe science.
4 • The toxicity testing strategy was expedited through a unique partnership between the
5 Department of Defense and EPA, together with members of an Interagency Perchlorate
6 Steering Committee (IPSC), which includes other governmental representatives from the
7 National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and affected state, tribal, and
8 local governments.
9 • The charge of the IPSC is to facilitate and coordinate accurate accounts of related technological
10 issues (occurrence surveys, health assessment, ecotoxicology assessment, treatability, waste
11 stream handling, and analytical detection). This assessment is intended to address the need for
12 evaluation of perchlorate's potential to cause human health effects or impact on ecological
13 systems, based on currently available data.
14
15 Physicochemical Characteristics
16 • As an oxidant, perchlorate is kinetically nonlabile. This means the reduction of the central
17 chlorine atom from an oxidation state of +7 (perchlorate) to -1 (chloride ion) occurs extremely
18 slowly. Sorption is not expected to attenuate perchlorate because it absorbs weakly to most soil
19 minerals. Natural chemical reduction in the environment is not expected to be significant.
20 These two factors account for perchlorate being both very mobile in aqueous systems and
21 persistent for many decades under typical ground and surface water conditions.
22 • The activation energy to perchlorate reduction is so high that it cannot be expected to act as an
23 oxidant under human physiological conditions (i.e., dilute solution, unelevated temperatures,
24 neutral pH). This is supported by absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination studies
25 that show perchlorate is excreted virtually unchanged in the urine after absorption.
26
27 Hazard Identification and Mode of Action Testing Strategy
28 • The health effects and toxicity database available in the spring of 1997 was determined to be
29 inadequate for quantitative risk assessment by an independent (non-EPA) peer review. A
30 testing strategy was developed based on a hazard identification using the available data and the
31 suspected mode of action for perchlorate to target testing on potential effects of perchlorate.

Data from this effort was used to support the previous EPA draft assessment and this revised
2 assessment in 2002.
3 • To design a testing strategy based on the mode of action for a chemical, it is necessary to
4 understand its toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics. Perchlorate is readily absorbed from the
5 intestinal tract, and oral uptake is considered to be the major route of exposure. Because of its
6 high charge, perchlorate does not pass readily through the skin. Exposure via inhalation is
7 expected to be negligible because the vapor pressure of perchlorate salts and acids is expected
8 to be low at room temperatures. Droplet size during showering likely would preclude
9 inhalation of perchlorate-contaminated water as an aerosol. Perchlorate is known to inhibit the
10 uptake of iodide in the thyroid at the sodium (Na+)-iodide (1-) symporter, or NIS, thereby
11 causing a reduction in the hormones thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3). When these
12 hormones enter the blood circulation, they are bound to plasma proteins. There may be other
13 locations of inhibition of iodide transport in the gland. Perchlorate itself is not metabolized in
14 the thyroid or peripheral tissues.
15 • Control of circulating concentrations of these hormones is regulated primarily by a negative
16 feedback known as the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis or feedback system involving three
17 organs: (1) the thyroid, which produces T4 and T3; (2) the pituitary gland which produces
18 TSH; and (3) the hypothalamus, which also responds to and helps to maintain optimal T4 and
19 T3 levels. The hypothalamus stimulates the pituitary gland through thyrotrophic-releasing
20 hormone (TRH) to produce thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), which then prompts the
21 thyroid to produce T4 and T3. Cells in the hypothalamus and pituitalo/ gland respond to the
22 levels of circulating T4 and T3, such that when thyroid production levels are low, there is a
23 signal to increase the output ofTRH and TSH. Circulating hormone levels (T4, T3, and TSH)
24 can be monitored readily to serve as biomarkers of exposure and effect of agents that disrupt
25 the status of this negative feedback system.
26 • The hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid feedback system for regulation of thyroid hormones is
27 conserved across species. Differences in plasma pr9tein binding between rats and humans
28 account for differences in the circulating half.;life of the hormones and in thyroid response to
29 TSH between the species. New studies since 1999 have confirmed that the inhibition of iodide
30 uptake by perchlorate at the NIS is essentially the same sensitivity across species. This is

important when considering decrements in T4 as important to neurodevelopmental effects
2 versus neoplasia that results in the gland due to stimulation by TSH.
3 • Given its mode of action as an inhibitor of iodide uptake that results in disturbances ofthe
4 hypothalamic-pituitary~thyroid axis, concerns arose about the potential for perchlorate to cause
5 carcinogenic, neurodevelopmental, developmental, reproductive, and immunotoxic effects.
6 Further, there is concern for ecotoxicology effects on various aquatic and terrestrial plants and
7 animals.
8 • The human health testing strategy for perchlorate developed in 1997 originally included eight
9 different recommended studies to address data gaps and enhance the mechanistic information
l O o n the mode of action. The goal of these studies was to provide a comprehensive database on
11 which to arrive at a revised human health risk assessment with greater confidence than previous
12 recommended provisional values. These studies are described briefly below.
13 (1) A 90~day oral bioassay to identifY other target tissues in young adult rats; to provide data
14 on the effects of repeated exposures to perchlorate on T3, T4, and TSH levels; to
15 evaluate recovery of effects after 30 days; and to screen for some reproductive
16 parameters. A genotoxicity assay also was performed on rats from the terminal sacrifice.
17 (2) A neurodevelopmental study in rats to evaluate the potential for functional and
18 morphological effects in offspring from the mother exposed. during pregnancy and
19 lactation.
20 (3) A Segment II developmental study in rabbits to evaluate the potential for perchlorate to
21 cause birth defects and to provide data on thyroid hormone effects in a second species
22 other than the rat.
23 (4) A two-generation reproductive toxicity study to evaluate the potential for perchlorate to
24 cause deficits in reproductive performance in adult rats and for toxicity in the young
25 offspring.
26 (5) Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) studies to characterize
27 the pharmacokinetics of perchlorate in laboratory animals and humans and to provide
28 data necessary to allow construction of models for quantitative description of different
29 internal dose metrics and interspecies extrapolation.
January 16, 2002 E~6 Draft-Do Not Quote or Cite

(6) Mechanistic studies that characterize the effects of perchlorate on the iodide uptake
2 mechanism across species as a link with the ADME studies to aid in the quantitative
3 extrapolation of dose across species.
4 (7) A battery of genotoxicity assays to evaluate the potential for carcinogenicity by
5 evaluating the potential for direct effects on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).
6 (8) Immunotoxicity'studies to evaluate the potential for perchlorate to disrupt immune
7 function, including cell-mediated and humoral toxicity.
8 • After the External Peer Review in 1999, additional studies were performed to replicate the
9 neurodevelopmental study (i.e., changes in brain morphometry and motor activity); determine
10 the developmental toxicity potential in rats versus rabbits; investigate ad~itional aspects of
11 immunotoxicity; and develop a consistent nomenclature and scoring system for the
12 histopathological lesions in the thyroid gland. Additional pharmacokinetic data was also
13 developed into physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of perchlorate and
14 iodide distribution.
15 • A battery of ecological screening tests as part of the 1997 testing strategy was conducted as
16 part of the 1997 testing strategy in laboratory organisms representative of ecological receptors
17 across soil, sediment, and water to evaluate dose-response relationships. These were
18 considered to be a tier of tests to give an idea of gross toxicity that would determine the need
19 and types of tests to be performed in the next tier. The tests did not measure the amount of
20 perchlorate in the tissues of the species being tested. Based on stakeholder input and the need
21 for a more focused battery of tests, lettuce was substituted for duckweed because of Tribal
22 concerns regarding the sizable le'ttuce crop along the Colorado river. The following species
23 were selected for the first round of testing:
24 (l) Daphnia magna (water flea) to represent an aquatic invertebrate
25 (2) Ceriodaphnia magna (water flea) to represent an aquatic invertebrate
26 (3) Lactuca sativa (lettuce) to represent a vascular plant
27 (4) Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow) to represent an aquatic invertebrate
28 (5) Eiseniafoetida (earthworm) to represent a soil invertebrate
29 (6) Microtus pennsylvanicus (meadow vole) to represent an herbivore
30 • Other studies in the set of tests included the Frog Embryo Teratogenesis Assay: Xenopus
31 (FETAX) and a phytoremediation study to examine uptake, distribution, and degradation in

experimental systems with rooted cuttings of woody plants, including willow, Eastern
2 Cottonwood, and eucalyptus.
3 • Additional studies, some of chronic duration, on effect levels in aquatic animals, an aquatic
4 plant, a terrestrial plant, and a soil invertebrate have been performed since 1999. A study of
5 perchlorate occurrence in six selected sites with known or suspected contamination also
6 examined perchlorate concentrations in site media and in various ecological receptors.
7
8 Human Health Assessment
9 • The testing strategy confirmed that the target tissue for perchlorate toxicity was the thyroid
10 gland. Anti-thyroid effects included iodide uptake inhibition, perturbations ofT3, T4, and TSH
11 hormones, and thyroid histopathology in adult, fetal, and postnatal rats across studies with a
12 range of experimental design. Thyroid weight in these studies was also effected. Other than
13 effects in the thyroid, no effects were observed in rabbits of the developmental study, but the
14 developmental study in rats identified 30 mg/kg-day as the lowest observed adverse effect level
15 (LOAEL).
16 • Competitive inhibition of iodide uptake at the NIS by perchlorate is the key event leading to
17 both potential neurodevelopmental and neoplastic sequelae. The decrement in iodide uptake
18 leads to subsequent drops in T4 and T3 that can lead to permanent neurodevelopmental
19 deficits. Because of strong correlations between changes in iodide uptake inhibition with
20 decrements in T3 and T4; between T3 and T4 with changes in TSH; and between changes in
21 T3, T4, or TSH with thyroid histopathology, an assessment model was proposed that used the
22 changes in T3, T4, and TSH as the precursor lesions to subsequent effects that potentially could
23 lead to thyroid tumors or to altered neurodevelopment. This assessment approach essentially
24 harmonizes noncancer and cancer approaches because it is presumed that the no-observed
25 adverse-effect-Ievel (NOAEL) for the precursor lesions will preclude any subsequent sequelae
26 at higher doses.
27 • Thyroid tumors were observed in previous studies in rats exposed in long-term bioassays at
28 high doses. Thyroid tumors were more recently also diagnosed in the first-generation (FI)
29 adults (second parental generation [P2]) at 19 weeks in a two-generation reproductive study.
30 Both the latency and incidence of these tumors were significant relative to the entirety of the
31 National Toxicology Program data base for this type of tumor and in this strain ofrat. These

1 effects and the demostration of a progression with duration of effects on hormones and thyroid
2 histopathology in the 90-day study raised the concern that extended exposures to perchlorate
3 may change the hypothalamic-pituitary-feedback system or the cellular sensitivity and demand
4 for thyroid hormones.
5 • The rat model is considered relevant yet conservative for human health risk assessment of
6 potential thyroid neoplasia because of the differences in thyroid structure and hormone
7 half~lives. Perchlorate was demonstrated to be nongenotoxic in the testing battery employed,
8 suggesting the antithyroid effects are an indirect mode of action for thyroid tumor formation.
9 • Due to the age- and time-dependent nature of the key event of perchlorate toxicity and its
10 anti-thyroid effects, the revised RID was based on weight-of-the~evidence approach to the
11 entire data base. The RID is proposed to be protective of both neurodevelopmental and
12 neoplastic sequelae. An administered dose of 0.01 mg/kg-day was supported as a lowest-
13 observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) based on effects on brain morphometry in pups from a
14 PN021 sacrifice in a neurodevelopmental study that repeated similar observations made in a
15 similar 1998 study, hormonal effects indicative of hypothyroidism (decreased T4 and increased
16 TSH) in the dams of those same pups on 0021, thyroid histopathology and hormone changes
17 in these same pups at various developmental stages (0021, PN04, PN09, and PN021),
18 thyroid histopathology and hormone changes at the 14- and 90-day sacrifice dates in a
19 subchronic study, and indications of immu!10toxicity (dermal contact hypersensitivity).
20 • A human equivalent exposure (HEE) was calculated using physiologically-based
21 pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for interspecies adjustment based on the area under the curve
22 (AUC) of perchlorate in the serum as the dose metric. The HEE for the maternal dams was
23 chosen for operational derivation because brain morphometry effects may have been
24 programmed in utero and because the dams of effected pups were hypothyroid.
25 • A composite uncertainty factor of300 was used to address uncertainties in the extrapolations
26 required for the RID derivation. A three-fold factor for intraspecies variability was retained
27 due to the variability observed in the data and PBPK modeling for the adult humans and
28 because the subjects used to develop the models did not provide kinetic data for the potentially
29 susceptible population. There was also uncertainty in the parallelogram approach to extending
30 the adult structures to predict doses for different life stages in the human. A full factor often
31 was applied to extrapolate the LOAEL for the adverse effects (brain morphometry, colloid
January 16, ;2002 E-9 Draft-Do Not Quote or Cite

depletion and hormone changes) observed in various studies at the 0.01 mg/kg-day dosage
2 level. A three-fold fac~or for duration was applied due to the concern for the biological
3 importance of the statistically significant increase in tumors observed in the F I-generation pups
4 (second parental, P2 generation) at 19 weeks and the eviden~e for progression of effects with
5 extended exposure in the 90-day study. The finding of tumors at 19 weeks raised concern for
6 in utero programming, i.e., that disruption of thyroid hormones in the developing fetus may
7 predispose the developing neonate and adult to future insults to the thyroid gland. This factor
8 can also be viewed as part of a data base deficiency since there are no adequate long-term
9 bioassays of perchlorate. Finally, a three-fold factor was applied for inaccurate characterization
10 of immunotoxicity since recent studies reinforced concern for this potential endpoint. Because
11 the test article was ammonium perchlorate, an adjustment factor of 0.85 was made for the
12 percent of molecular weight of the salt from ammonium (15.35%), so that the RID is expressed
13 for perchlorate as the anion alone. This was done to be compatible with the analytical methods
14 that measure the anion in environmental samples and because most perchlorate salts readily
15 dissolve in water. The resultant revised RID value for perchlorate is 0.00003 mg/kg-day.
16 Confidence in the principal study, the data base and the RID were all designated as medium.
17
18 Screening Ecological Risk Assessment
19 • A secondary acute value of5 mg/L (as perchlorate) was derived to be protective of95% of
20 aquatic organisms during short-term exposures with 80% confidence. The secondary chronic
21 value of 0.6 (as perchlorate) likewise was derived to be protective of95% of aquatic organisms
22 during short-term exposures with 80% confidence. These values were derived based on
23 sodium perchlorate and are probably protective even if ammonium perchlorate is the
24 contaminant released. Calculated ammonia-nitrogen concentrations corresponding to those
25 values are below the acute and chronic ambient water quality criteria for ammonia, regardless
26 of pH.
27 • For terrestrial plants, the quartile inhibitory concentrations for growth in soil and sand were
28 78 mg/kg (293 mg/L) and 41 mg/kg (160 mg/L), respectively. A factor of 10 was applied to
29 account for interspecies variance to obtain a screening benchmark of 4 mg/kg.
January 16,2002 E-IO Draft-Do Not Quote or Cite

• Because of limited data on effects for soil invertebrates, a conservative estimate of a threshold
2 for soil community effects was derived at 1 mg/kg. The equivalent aqueous phase benchmark
3 is 2.8 mglL.
4 • A factor of 10 for interspecies variance and LOAEL to NOAEL extrapolation was applied to
5 the human health risk LOAEL estimate based on rat data (0.01 mg/kg-day) to obtain a
6 screening benchmark of 0.001 mg/kg-day for the representative herbivore (meadow vole)
7 because it also is a rodent. The population-level implications of this effect are unknown, but it
8 seems likely that such effects on the thyroid could diminish survivorship and fecundity, which
9 would diminish population production.
10 • Data are available showing that-perchlorate accumulates in the tissues of exposed fish,
11 amphibians, and invertebrates. However, data are insufficient to determine whether perchlorate
12 is concentrated in those tissues to levels exceeding the levels of exposure. By contrast, several
13 studies have shown that perchlorate is taken up and concentrated in aerial plant parts, especially
14 leaves, although studies designed for the purpose of quantifying plant concentration factors
15 have not yet been conducted.
]6
17 Uncertainties and Assessment Research Needs
18 • Accurate exposure information is a requisite for risk characterization for both human and
19 ecological assessments. These data should include transport and transformation processes,
20 notably the fate of perchlorate in irrigated soils because of the potential for evaporative
21 concentration.
22 • Research concerning the human health risks of perchlorate needs to better characterize the
23 dose-response for perchlorate inhibition of iodide uptake in adults, fetuses, and neonates. More
24 definitive studies linking iodide uptake inhibition and the degree of perturbation of the
25 hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis (i.e., changes in T3, T4, and TSH levels) and association
26 with neurobehavioral problems, thyroid changes, and neoplastic sequelae may continue to
27 improve the confidence in the assessment. Understanding the relative sensitivity oflaboratory
28 animal assays of neurodevelopmental effects versus epidemiological studies of
29 neuropsychological development also needs to be advanced. Research on potential factors
,
30 influencing sensitivity is critically requisite. Animal models of thyroid impairment such as
31 iodide deficiency and "womb to tomb" exposure designs should be explored.
January 16,2002 E-l1 Draft-Do Not Quote or Cite

..
• Because only a screening tier oftests has been performed, the major uncertainty derives from
2 data gaps. Data on bioaccumulation in aquatic biota would allow evaluation of exposure of
3 organisms that feed on fish and other aquatic organisms. Effects of perchlorate on algae and
4 aquatic macrophytes are required to estimate risks to aquatic primary producers. Data on
5 bioaccummulation in aquatic plants are necessary to assess direct impact to primary consumers
6 (i.e., planktonic and benthic invertebrate communities). Data on accumulation in terrestrial
7 vascular plants also should be investigated further. The factor applied for the use of subchronic
8 data in fish could be addressed by chron~ effect testing. Effects also should be determined in
9 nondaphnid invertebrates and of dietary exposure in birds and herbivorous or litter-feeding
10 invertebmtes.
1I
12 Risk Characterization
13 • As noted above, the lack of exposure information precludes comparison with the human health
14 and ecological toxicity assessment for accurate characterization of risk. Indirect human
IS exposure pathways can be addressed best by a new EPA document, Methodology for Assessing
16 Health Risks Associated with Multiple Pathway of Exposure to Combustor Emissions, which is
17 scheduled for final release in January 2002.
18 • Noncancer neurobehavioral effects have been shown at lower doses. The estimate for
19 perchlorate has been based on precursor~ffects considered protective for both the thyroid
20 neoplasia and neurodevelopmental effects. It is appropriate for comparison against direct oral
21 exposures. The frequency and magnitude of exposure are key attributes for characterization
22 compared with those assumptions of continuous lifetime exposure assumed in the derivation.
23 The degree to which the particular suspected population at risk fits with the assumptions used
24 in the RID derivation should be kept in mind when performing any risk characterization.
25 Further, RID estimates are not intended to serve as a "bright line" because, by definition, there
26 is an order-of-magnitude uncertainty around the estimate. This typically translates into a range
27 of threefold below to threefold above the RID.
28 • Ecological risk could not be precluded nor accurately characterized because of the significant
29 data gaps described above.
30

Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 10:28 AM
To: Rosana Abedin
SUbject: (no subject)
Good morning folks. Please see the email text and attached files from
Dan Hautman, EPA UCMR Implementation Team Co-Leader. Dan provided a
list of 4,000 or so UCMR PWSs, and a previous attempt to pullout those
associated with 000. I have taken the liberty to review his 000 list,
and have highlighted in red entries that do not belong (see his
discussion below for methodology.)
Dan,
I think much of what your looking for is attached below. Two

spreadsheets - one is a listing of all PWSs that are considered
applicable to UCMR (large and selected small) that are required to
monitor for perchlorate (approx 4000). The second is a listing of
possible DOD PWSs along with the data that is currently posted in the
pivot table (or "No Data" is listed). This second spreadsheet is
further explained below:
The possible DOD PWSs were pulled from our UCMR applicability database.
Allow me to explain how I derived this list. The file contains 61
public water systems (PWSs) which were pulled from our UCMR
applicability database which contains over 4000 PWSs (3200 large and 800
small) applicable to the UCMR (the first spreadsheet). These 61 PWS
were pulled after I conducted individual manual query searches for PWS
names which included the following words or acronyms:
AFB
naval
navy
army
marine
air
USMC
fort (many of these are simply municipal water systems, not, DOD
facilities - but I really can't tell, only make assumptions - see below)
base
camp
proving
Many of the selected PWSs likely serve DOD facilities, but this list is
not absolutely certain. I cannot guarantee that it includes all the
UCMR applicable PWSs which may be associated with a DOD facility (some
may have unassuming names not associated with the DOD facility name) and
often times you will pull PWS names which are not DOD facilities but by
coincidence are serving a community with perhaps a historic military
name (e.g. Fort Wayne vs. Fort Bragg - the former a city in Indiana,
the latter I am fairly certain is a DOD facility). I have eliminated
the obvious PWSs such as Fort Wayne, Fort Lauderdale, Fort Myers,
etc . .. , but I have some uncertainty about whether some of the others are
simply municipal systems or DOD facilities (e.g., Fort Smith). Also
realize, that if the PWS at a DOD facility serves less than 10,000
individuals and was not selected as a small system, they are not
required to conduct UCMR monitoring and will not be in this list.
Next, I compare queried this list of 61 against the pivot table of

available UCMR data that has thus far been'reported and posted out on
the web as of February 2, 2004. Of these 61 PWSs .... 40 have NO
perchlorate data posted (which has been approved by the PWS, and
reviewed by EPA) and 21 have posted perchlorate data including one
observed positive (17.2 ug/L) from one of the water plants at Wright
Patterson AFB in OH (PWSID: OH29033l2, PWS Name: WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB,
'B'). Below is the Excel table export of these data. Keep in mind that
2
10
PWS PWSwlo'
count data count
AK AK2212039 Fort Richardson SW 11500 ews .Large No Data
AK ;AK2310918 Fort Wainwright GW 12000 ews Large .No Data

~--'t
AL 04 idekalb iALOOOO509 Fort Payne Waterworks Board ooooH 0509001 SW 18735 ews 'Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 dekalb lALOOOO509 Fort Payne Waterworks Board ooooH 0509001 ;SW 18735'ews Large Perchlorate ugIL 2oo2_04Apr 4 <MRL o o
.,w
AL 04 ,dekalb !ALOOOO509 'Fort Payne Waterworks Board OOOOH 10509001 SW 18735 ews .Large 'Perchlorate uglL ,2002_1OOct 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 idekalb iALOOOO509 Fort Payne Waterworks Board ,OOOOH 0509001 SW 18735 ews :Large .Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_01Jan 4 '<MRL o
AL 04 madison 'ALOOOO899 US Army Aviation & Missile Command 'OOOOH '0899001 SW 21180 ews 'Large .Perchlorate uglL 2oo1_120ec 4 i<MRL o o
AL .04 madison IALOOOO899 US Army Aviation & Missile Command 00002T 0899002 ,SW 21180'ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo1_120ec 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 I,madison ALOOOO899 US Army Aviation & Missile Command 00002T 0899002 SW 21180 ews 'Large 'Perchlorate ,uglL 2oo2_03Mar 4 <MRL o o
Al 04 'madison iAL0000899 US Army Aviation & Missile Command OOOOH 0899001 SW 21180'eWS Large Perchlorate uglL 2002_03Mar 4 '<MRL o o
AL ,04 "1 madison iALoo00899 .US Army Aviation & Missile Command oooon 0899001 SW 21180eWS Large Perchlorate luglL 2oo1_09Sep 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 ;madison 'ALOOOO899 ,US Army Aviation & Missile Command 00002T 0899002 SW 21180 ews Large Perchlorate iuglL 12oo1_06Jun 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 madison ,ALOOOO899 US Army Aviation & Missile Command oooon 0899001 SW 211 80 ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo1_06Jun 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 'madison .ALOOOO899 US Army Aviation & Missile Command 00002T 0899002 SW 21180 ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo1_09Sep 4 <MRL o
AL 04 'russell ALoool137 Fort Mitchell Water System 00004T 1137003 GW 4674eWSM Perchlorate uglL .2002_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
AL .04 .russell ALoool137 Fort Mitchell Water System 00004T 1137003 GW 4674 ews 'M ,Perchlorate uglL ,2002_01 Jan 4 .<MRL o o
AL 04 'russell iAL0001137 Fort Mitchell Water System ooo03T 1137002 GW 'M ,Perchlorate ' uglL 2oo2_07JuI 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 !russell 'ALOool137 Fort Mitchell Water System 00003T 1137002 'GW M Perchlorate uglL 2002_01 Jan 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 russell rALoool137 ,Fort Mitchell Water System 00002T ,1137001 GW M ,Perchlorate ,uglL 2oo2_02Feb 4 <MRL o
AL 04 'dale ;AL0001489 Fort Rucker 00005T 1489004 GW 18000 ews Large Perchlorate uglL ,2oo2_02Feb 4 <MRL o o
;
AL 04 idale iALooo1489 'Fort Rucker 0OOO3T 1489OO2GW 18000 ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_02Feb 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 dale 'ALooo1489 Fort Rucker 00004T 1489003GW 18000, ews Large Perchlorate 'uglL 2oo2_02Feb 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 'dale ;ALooo1489 Fort Rucker oooon 1489006 GW 18000 ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_02Feb 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 'dale !ALooo1489 Fort Rucker 00008T 1489007 GW 18000, ews large Perchlorate uglL 2002_02Feb 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 .dale ;AL0001489 Fort Rucker 00006T 1489005 GW 18000 ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_02Feb 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 dale ·AL0001489 Fort Rucker 00003T 1489002 GW 18000 ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 dale ,ALoool489 Fort Rucker 00004T 1489OO3GW 18000 ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 .dale AL0001489 Fort Rucker 00005T 1489004 GW 18000' ews Large Perchlorale uglL 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 dale ;AL0001489 Fort Rucker OODOn 1489006 GW 18000 ews Large Perchlorate ug/L 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 dale ,ALooo1489 Fort Rucker 00008T 1489007 GW 18000 ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
AL 04 dale ,AL0001489 Fort Rucker 00006T 1489005 GW 18000 ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2002_07Jul 4 <MRL o
PWS PWSw/o:
count data cou'n!
l
AZ. !AZ.0402078 Fort Huachuca GW 15603 CWS Large 'No Data
oaN/l0W
CA 09 !kern !CA1510701 Edwards Air Force Base· Main Base 00011
02GOl
SWP 17486 CWS Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
CA 09
,Ikern !CA1510701 Edwards Air Force Base· Main Base 00007
.09N/i oW-
SWP 17486'CWS Large Perchlorate ugIL 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
1 16P03
OONiiow o
CA 09 :kern 'CA1510701 Edwards Air Force Base· Main Base 00008
16R02
'SWP 17486': CWS Large .Perchlorate uglL 2002_07Jul 4 <MRL o
i oaN/iow:
CA ,09 !kern ICA1510701 Edwards Air Force Base· Main Base 00016
01COl
SWP 17486 CWS Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_07Jul 4 ,<MRL o o
!
'ooN/l0W
CA 09 lkem iCA1510701 EdWards Air Force Base • Main Base 00012
24G02
'SWP 17486 CWS :Large :Perchlorate 'uglL 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL o o

J.~,
I WN/ioW::'
:SWP
CA 09 :kern ICA1510701 :Edwards Air Force Base· Main Base 00014
36L01
17486:CWS :Large Perchlorate 'uglL ',2002_07Jul 4 '<MRL o o
,08flliiOw.
CA 09 !kem jCA1510701 Edwards Air Force Base· Main Base :00010
'02MOl
[SWP 17486: CWS Large Perchlorate ,uglL 2oo2_07Jul 4 '<MRL o o
'ooN/iow
CA 09 ,kern 'CA1510701 Edwards Air Force Base· Main Base 00013
24E03
:SWP 17486. CWS :Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_07Jul 4 ,<MRL o o
CA 09 ern ICA1510701 Edwards Air Force Base· Main Base 00015
:09Nii ow.SWP
17486: CWS Large Perchlorate ·uglL 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL o
j~!lp()3
CA
mr ,~.,
!CA16107oo Lemoore Naval Air Station SW 10363:CWS :Large No Data

j
I
CA 'CA2710705 Camp Roberts· California National Guard GW 20370CWS Large No Data
CA :CA3410700 McClellan Air Force Base· Main Base GW 17600' NTNC 'Large No Data
CA ICA361 0703 USMC Twentynine Palms GW 170oo! CWS Large No Data
CA I CA3610705 Fort Irwin GW 13092,CWS Large No Data
CA i CA371 0700 Camp Pendleton (North) GW 11620: CWS Large 'No Data
l~C
CA :CA3710702 Camp Pendleton (South) GW 33000iCWS ,Large 'No Data
CA 09
Isanta !CA42107OO Vandenberg Air Force Base 00016 08N134W- :SWP 12000' CWS ,Large Perchlorate ugIL 2oo3_12Dec 4 <MRL o o
:1?,ar!1!!f1', ,16GO!L, i. m
•••
,santa 'i08N134W. SWP

CA 09
:barbara
ICA4210700 Vandenberg Air Force Base 00003
16G()4
12ooo!CWS Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo3_12Dec 4 <MRL o Q

!sania
08N134W- 'SWP
CA 09 !CA421 0700 Vandenberg Air Force Base 00001 12000,CWS :Large 'Perchlorate ugIL 2oo3_12Dec 4 <MRL o o
m6a~~W:swp
.,barbml!@ t,~
CA ,09
I:~~ra ICA4210700 Vandenberg Air Force Base 00001
16G05
12000jCWS .Large ,Perchlorate ugIL 2oo2_12Dec 4 :<MRL o o

'sanla OsN134W·
CA 09 iCA4210700 Vandenberg Air Force Base 00002 Swp 12000' CWS Large .Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_12Dec 4 '<MRL o o
:I?l(!!f:lara lE~Q?.
'santa '08N134W- SWP
CA 09
:barbara
ICA4210700 Vandenberg Air Force Base 00003
16G04
12ooo:CWS Large Perchlorate uglL 2OO2_12Dec 4 <MRL o o

santa 08N134W- SWP
CA 09 :CA4210700 Vandenberg Air Force Base 00016 120oo'CWS 'Large ,Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_12Dec 4 <MRL o o
:!?I!J:bal'/!,, 16G(),5"""
'santa 08N134W- SWP
CA 09
barbara
CA421 0700 'Vandenberg Air Force Base 00016
16G05
12000:CWS Large Perchlorate 'uglL .2003_05May 4 <MRL o o

)santa
OaN134W- SWP
CA 09 CA421 0700 Vandenberg Air Force Base 00001 12000, CWS Large Perchlorate uglL 2003_05May 4 <MRL o o
bl!rb~ 16CO!;",
lsanta OaN134W- SWP
CA 09
!I,arbara
iCA4210700 Vandenberg Air Force Base 00002
16J02
12000:CWS Large Perchlorate ug/L 2003_05May 4 <MRL o o

isanta 08N134W. SWP
CA 09
!barbl!ra
jCA4210700 Vandenberg Air Force Base 00003 12OOO,CWS Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo3_05May 4 <MRL o
16GlJ4.m
";' "
4810015- SW
CA 09 jsolano 'CA481OO15 Travis Air Force Base· Vallejo 00003
003
32000' CWS jLarge Perchlorate uglL 2oo1_01Jan 4 <MRL o o
4810015- SW
CA 09 solano ICA481oo15 Travis Air Force Base - Vallejo 00003
0()3 .
32000CWS Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo1_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
48iool5- SW
CA 09 solano 'CA481oo15 Travis Air Force Base· Vallejo '00003
003
32000 CWS Large Perchlorate uglL 2001_100e! 4 <MRL o
CA CA4810701 Travis Air Force Base GW 13637 CWS Large No Data
PWS PWSw/o.,
count data count
Fl 'FL1170814 Corry Field· Naval Air Station GW 17192 ews ,Large No Data
FL 04 'duval ,FL2160734 Mayport Naval Station (Mainside) 08001 32228 GW 14642 ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2003_02Feb 4 <MRL
° °
FL 04 ;duval 'FL2160734 Mayport Naval Station, (Mainside) 08001 32228 GW 14642, ews 'Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo3_07Jul 4 <MRL
°
FL 04 duval FL2161212 Jacksonville Naval AirSsation 08001 32212 GW 20000 ews ,Large Perchlorate ug/L 2oo3_07Jul 4 <MRL o
°
FL 04 duval 'FL2161212 Jacksonville Naval Air Ssation 08001 32212 GW 20000, ews ,Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo3_02Feb 4 ,<MRl o
°
FL 04 duval 'FL2161212 Jacksonville Naval Air Ssation 08002 83868 GW 20000, ews ;Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo3_02Feb 4 <MRl o
°
FL 04 duval 'FL2161212 Jacksonville Naval Air Ssation 08002 83868 GW 20000 ews Large 'Perchlorate :ug/L 2oo3_07Jul 4 :<MRl
FL FL4560490 Fort Pierce Utilities Authority GW 45100 ews 'Large No Data

°
GA 04 iliberty GA1790024 Fort Stewart· Main ,01472 301 21000' ews Large Perchlorate :uglL ,2oo2_06Jun 4 <MRl o
°
GA 04 liberty !GA1790024 ;Fort Stewart· Main 03468 303 GW 21000; ews 'Large :Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_06Jun 4 <MRl o
~ °
GA 04 'liberty iGA1790024 Fort Stewart· Main '01472 301 'GW 21ooo:eWSLarge Perchlorate ;uglL 2002_01 Jan 4 <MRl o
°
'GA 04 liberty ;GA1790024 Fort Stewart· Main 03687 304 GW 21000 ews Large Perchlorate 'uglL :2002_01 Jan 4 <MRl o
°
GA 04 liberty GA1790024 Fort Stewart· Main 03795 305 GW 21000 ews Large Perchlorate ug/L ,2oo2_01Jan 4 <MRl o
GA 04 liberty 'GA1790024 Fort Stewart· Main 02965 302 GW 21000 ews Large 'Perchlorate 'ug/L 2002_01 Jan 4 <MRl
°
° °
GA 04 ,liberty !GA1790024 Fort Stewart· Main '03468 303 GW 21000; ews :Large Perchlorate 'uglL 2002_01 Jan 4 <MRl
° °
GA 04 liberty GA1790024 Fort Stewart - Main 03687 304 :GW 21000, ews ,Large Perchlorate ,uglL 2002_06Jun 4 <MRl
° °
GA 04 iliberty GA1790024 Fort Stewart· Main 02965 302 GW 21000 ews Large Perchlorate ,Jug/L ,2002_06Jun 4 <MRl o
GA ,GA2150002 !Fort Benning SW 4400d ews ,Large 'No Data
GA 04 'richmond ! GA2450028 Fort Gordon 02054 ,301 SW 24000 ews ,Large Perchlorate ug/L 2oo3_07Jul 4 <MRl o o
GA 04 irichmond GA2450028 Fort Gordon 02054 301 SW 24000' ews Large 'Perchlorate uglL 2oo3_04Apr 4 ,<MRl o o
GA 04 :richmond GA2450028 Fort Gordon 02054 301 SW 24000 ews Large Perchlorate uglL ,2003_12Dec 4 .<MRl o o
GA 04 richmond GA2450028 Fort Gordon 02054 301 SW 24000' ews Large Perchlorate 'uglL 2oo3_09Sep 4 <MRl o
GU 'GUOOOOO10 U.S. Navy Water System SW 14300: ews Large No Data
IA 07 dee ,IA5625062 Fort Madison Municipal Waterworks 04840 02 'SW 11618 ews 'Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo1_03Mar 4 <MRl o o
IA 07 ,lee '1A5625062 ,Fort Madison Municipal Waterworks 04840 '02 SW 11618 ews 'Large Perchlorate uglL 2001_11 Nov 4 <MRl o
°
IA 07 'lee IA5625062 Fort Madison Municipal Waterworks 04840 02 ,SW 1161 B: ews :Large Perchlorate ' ug/L 2oo1_12Dec 4 <MRl o o
IA 07 ilee !IA5625062 Fort Madison Municipal Waterworks 04840 02 SW 11618ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo1_06Jun 4 <MRl o
IA 07 webster 'IA9433OSO Fort Dodge Water Supply 06471 02 GW 25894: ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_02Feb 4 <MRl o
°
IA 07 'webster IA94330SO Fort Dodge Water Supply 06470 03 GW 25694 ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2002_02Feb 4 <MRl o o
IA 07 webster IA9433OSO Fort Dodge Water Supply 06472 01 GW 25694' ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2OO2_07Jul 4 <MRl o o
IA 07 webster IA9433050 Fort Dodge Water Supply 06472 01 GW 25694 ews Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_02Feb 4 <MRL o o
IA 07 webster IA94330SO Fort Dodge Water Supply 06470 03 GW 25894 ews •Large Perchlorate uglL 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRl o o
PWS PWSw/o
count data count
o
IL 05 :lake 'IL0975227 GREAT LAKES NAVAL TRAINING STATION 16173 TAP_01 SW 31637 CWS Large ,Perchlorate ugll 2oo3_02Feb 4 o o
1
IL 05 'lake hL0975227 'GREAT LAKES NAVAL TRAINING STATION 16173 TAP_Ol SW 31637CWS Large ,Perchlorate ugll 2003_11Nov 4 i<MRL o o
IL 05 'lake i1L0975227 GREAT LAKES NAVAL TRAINING STATlON 16173 TAP_01 SW 3163icws Large Perchlorate ugll 2oo3_05May 4 '<MRL o o
i
IL 05 'lake QL0975227 GREAT LAKES NAVAL TRAINING STATION 16173 TAP_01 SW 31637 CWS 'Large ,Perchlorate ugll 2oo3_0BAug 4 <MRL o
IN 05 'gibson iIN5226001 ,Fort Branch Water Department oooon 901 'GW 3591CWS M Perchlorate 'ugIL i2002_11 Nov 4 '<MRL o o
j
:IN 05 'gibson ilN5226oo1

~
Fort Branch Water Department 'oooon 901 GW 3591,CWS 'M Perchlorate ugll 2oo2_05May 4 <MRL o
KS 'I ~;2006114 FORT RILEY GW 18000 CWS Large No Data
KY iKY0470990 ,FORT KNOX I ENGINEERING & HOUSING SW 42400, CWS Large 'No Data
l"N~" ,o~_~,_,- --, _.,""._NNA
LA !LA1115065 South Fort Polk GW 21500' CWS Large No Data

ianne
MD ,03
,"-fUndel
iMD002oo12 FORT GEORGE G. MEADE 00001 0100000 SW 5OOO1,CWS VL Perchlorate 'ugIL 2003_01 Jan 4 <MRL o o
anne
MD 03
'arundel
MD002oo12 FORT GEORGE G. MEADE '00001 0100000 SW 50001 CWS 'VL Perchlorate ugll ,2002_100ct 4 <MRL o o
anne
MD 03
a~!}del
MD002oo12 FORT GEORGE G. MEADE 00001 0100000 SW 5OOO1'CWS VL Perchlorate 'ugll 2003_04Apr 4 <MRL o o
;anne
MD 03
iarundel
MD002oo12 FORT GEORGE G. MEADE 00001 0100000 SW 5OO01'CWS VL Perchlorate ugIL 2003_07Jul 4 <MRL o
MD MD012ooo2 ,Aberdeen Proving Ground - Chapel Hill SW 1200, Large No Data
MD MD018oo22 Patuxent Naval Air Station (NAWCAD) GW 11722'CWS Large 'No Data
MO iM03079500 Fort Leonard Wood SW 24ooo'CWS ,Large 'No Data
NC 04
1
t
icumberland NC0326344 FORT BRAGG 00004 EPl SW 65000' CWS VL iPerchlorate ugll '2002_07Jul 4 i<MRL o o
NC 04 cumberland i NC0326344 ' FORT BRAGG iOOOO4 EPl sw 65000 CWS iVL Perchlorate ugIL 2003_01 Jan 4 '<MRL o o
; tv
NC 04 icumberland i NC0326344 FORT BRAGG '00004 EPl SW 65000 CWS VL 'Perchlorate ugll i2oo2_100ct 4 <MRL o
NC INC0467041 USMC LEJEUNE·HADNOTPOINT GW 35000, CWS Large ,No Data '
NC ,NC0467042 USMC Lejune - New River Air Station 'GW 11500'CWS Large No Data
NC !NC0467043 USMC LEJEUNE·HOLCOMB BLVD. GW 170001 CWS Large 'No Data
NJ INJ0325OO1 FORT DIX SW 14500' CWS Large 'No Data
NM 'NM3567701 KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE GW 30000 CWS Large No Data
OH 05 ,greene IOH2903312 WRIGHT·PATTERSON AFB, 'B' 00013 EPl GW 12045'CWS Large Perchlorate ugll 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
OH 05 igreene 'OH2903312 WRIGHT·PATTERSONAFB, 'B' 00014 EP2 GW 12045 CWS Large Perchlorate ,ugll 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
OH 05 greene iOH2903312 WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, "B' 00013 EPl GW 12045 CWS Large ' Perchlorate ugll 2oo2_02Feb 4 <MRL o o
OH 05 greene OH2903312 WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, 'B' 00014 EP2 GW 12045 CWS Large Perchlorate ,ugll 2oo2_02Feb 4 17.2 o
,
OH 05 greene iOH2903412 WRIGHT·PATTERSON AFB AREA AIC 00014 EP3 GW 15160CWS Large Perchlorate ugll 2oo2_02Feb 4 <MRL o o
OH 05 'greene i OH2903412 WRIGHT·PATTERSON AFB AREA AIC 00013 EPl GW 15160 CWS Large 'Perchlorate ug/L 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
OH 05 greene OH2903412 WRIGHT·PATTERSON AFB AREA AIC 00013 EPl GW 15160,CWS Large Perchlorate ugll 2oo2_02Feb 4 <MRL o o
PWS PWSwlo
count data count
.0 0
OH 05 greene IOH2903412 WRIGHT·PATTERSON AFB AREA AIC 00016 EP2 GW 15160,CWS Large Perchlorale ,ugIL '2002_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
OH 05 :greene OH2903412 'WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB AREA AIC 00014 EP3 GW 15160CWS .Large 'Perchlorale ugIL 2002_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
OH ,05 'greene :OH2903412 iWRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB AREA AIC 00015 EP4 IGW 15160CWS iLarge ,Perchlorale ugIL ,2002_02Feb 4 '<MRL o o
OH 05 :greene iOH2903412 WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB AREA AIC 00015 EP4 GW 15160 CWS :Large .Perchlorale 'ugIL '2002_07Jul 4 '<MRL o
TN :TNOOOO820 FORT CAMPBELL WATER SYSTEM .SW 4OOOO.CWS :Large No Data
TX ITX0140107 .South Fort Hood SVIIP 38139'CWS iLarge No Data

'''''''''W-'; ~" __M
TX TX0150113 KELLY AIR FORCE BASE GW 21500CWS :Large :No Data
TX iTX0150114 LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE GW 20640'CWS Large No Data
TX iTX0150115 RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE 'GW 11820.CWSLarge No Data
TX iTX0150116 FORT SAM HOUSTON GW 17000]CWS Large No Data
TX TX071 0020 FORT BLISS MAIN BASE AREA GW 21800CWS :Large iNo Data
TX TX2430007 SHEPPARD AIR FORCE BASE SVIIP 12810 CWS i Large INo Data
UT 08 davis UT4900513 HILL AIR FORCE BASE 00009T 0602409 SVIIP 22082 CWS Large Perchlorale ugIL ,2001_100cl 4 <MRL o o
UT 08 davis UT~9OO513 HILL AIR FORCE BASE oooo2T 0602402 SVIIP 22082 CWS Large .Perchlorale ugIL i 2001_tOOcl 4 ,<MRL o o
UT 08 davis UT49OO513 HILL AIR FORCE BASE 00008T 0602408 SVIIP 22062 CWS 'Large :Perchlorale 'ugIL '2001_100cl 4 <MRL o o
UT 08 idavis iUT49OO513 HILL AIR FORCE BASE .00000T 0602402 SVIIP 22082 CWS ,Large :Perchlorate ugIL 2001_05M~ 4 <MRL o o
UT 08 :davis UT49OO513 HILL AIR FORCE BASE oooo8T 0602408 .SVIIP 22082· CWS .Large .Perchlorale 'ugIL 2001_05May 4 '<MRL o o
UT '08 :davis UT49OO513 HILL AIR FORCE BASE 00009T 0602409 SVIIP 2208i CWS 'Large Perchlorale .ugIL .2001_05May 4 <MRL o
VA VA6153675 QUANTICO MARINE BASE -MAINSlDE SW 13012CWSLarge No Data
WA ,10 kitsap 'WA5302714 SUBASE BANGOR 70090 GW

.7009C 15843 CWS Large :Perchlorale ugIL 2003_05May 4 <MRL o o
WA 10 ,kitsap iWA5302714 SUBASE BANGOR .70510 7051CL GW 15843CWS 'Large Perchlorale ugIL 2003_05May 4 <MRL o o
WA 10 !kitsap iWA5302714 SUBASE BANGOR 70510 7051CL GW 15843'CWS Large Perchlorale .ugIL 2003_12Dec 4 <MRL o o
WA 10 kitsap WA5302714 SUBASE BANGOR 70090 7009C GW 15843 CWS Large Perchlorale ugIL 2003_120ec 4 <MRL o
WA iWA5324350 FAIRCHILD AIR FORCE BASE GW 11227 CWS Large No Data
WA WA5326050 FORT LEWIS WATER - CANTONMENT GW 37577 CWS 'Large No Dala
W 'W1280103 FortAlkinson Waterworks GW 10227'CWS Large No Data
PWS PWSw/o
counl data counl
61 40
000 UCMR DATA FROM DANIEL HAUTMAN, UCMR IMPLEMENTATION TEAM CO-LEADER, OFFICE OF GROUNDWATER AND DRINKING WATER, EPA
PWS
PWS w/o
count data
count
Air Force UCMR Data From EPA UCMR POe
AK2211423 ,ElmendOrf Air Force SWP

AK 'Base
13100CWS Large No data
Edwards Air Force Base· 00011 08N110W

CA 09 kern CA1Sl0701
Main Base 02GOI
SWP 174B6'CWS Large Perchlorate jUglL 4 <MRL o o
'Edwards Air Force Base· 00007 O9N/10W
Main Base 16P03
SWP 17486CWS Large •Perchlorate ugIL 4 <MRL o o
Edwards Air Force Base ~ 00008 O9N/l0W
CA 09 kern ,CA1Sl0701
Main Base 16R02
'SWP 17486CWS ,Large Perchlorate ;uglL 4 <MRL o o
-
Edwards Air Force Base '00016 08N/l0W
Main Base ' 01COI
'SWP 17486'CWS Large Perchlorate !ugIL 4 <MRL o o
Edwards Air Force Base, 00012 ,09N/l0W
CA 09 'kern CA1Sl0701
Main Base 24G02
SWP 17486'CWS Large ;Perchlorate 1uglL '2002_07Jut 4 ,<MRL o o

Edwards Air Force Base'00014 09N/l0W
CA 09 kern ;CA151 0701

Main Base 36LOI
SWP 17486CWS 'Large Perchlorate ,uglL .2002_07Jut 4 ·<MRL o o
i
Edwards Air Force Base '00010 08N/l0W
CA 09 kern CAl 510701
Main Base 02MOI
SWP 17486 CWS iLarge ;Perchlorate -ugIL ;2002_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
,Edwards Air Force Base· 00013 09N110W
CA 09 'kern CA1Sl0701
'Main Base '24E03
;SWP 174B6iCWS ;Large ,Perchlorate :UglL ;2002_07Jut 4 <MRL o o
i
'Edwards Air Force Base· 00015 ,09N/l0W
CA ,09 'kern CAl 510701
Main Base '36P03
SWP 17486icws Large Perchlorate IUglL 2oo2_07Jul 4 '<MRL o
McCleUan Air Force Base

CA CA3410700
• Main Base
GW 17600.NTNC :Large No Data
.santa Vandenberg Air Force 08NI34W -

CA 09
'barbara
;CA421 0700
Base
00016
16GOS
SWP' 12000jCWS ;Large .Perchlorate !UgIL ~
2003 120ec
4 <MRL o o
santa Vandenberg Air Force 08NI34W
CA 09 ,barbara
,CA42107oo
Base
,00003
16G04
SWP 12000CWS jLarge Perchlorate ugIL ,2oo3_12Dec 4 <MRL o o

santa Vandenberg Air Force 08N/34W
CA ;09
'barbara
'CA42107oo
Base
00001
16COS
SWP 12ooo,CWS 'Large ,Perchlorate :ugIL ,2oo3_12Dec 4 <MRL o o

;
santa 'CA42107oo 'Vandenberg Air Force ' 08NI34W

CA 09
barbara Base 00001 16COS
SWP 12ooo,CWS Large Perchlorate !uglL '2002_12Dec 4 <MRL o o
.j
santa 'CA42107oo Vandenberg Air Force 08NI34W
CA 09
barbara ,Base 00002 16J02
SWP 12000CWS Large ,Perchlorate -uglL 2oo2_12Dec 4 <MRL o o

,santa Vandenberg Air Force ,08NI34W
CA 09
'barbara
CA4210700
Base
00003
16G04
SWP 12oo0CWS ,Large Perchlorate iuglL 2oo2_12Dec 4 <MRL o o

;santa Vandenberg Air Force ,OBNl34W
CA ,09 'barbara
,CA42107oo
Base
00016
16GOS
SWP 12000CWS Large Perchlorate juglL ,2oo2_12Dec 4 <MRL o o

santa Vandenberg Air Force OBNI34W
CA 09
'barbara
CA4210700
Base
00016
16GOS
SWP 12ooo,CWS Large Perchlorate :ugIL 2003_0SMay 4 <MRL o o

santa Vandenberg Air Force OBN/34W
CA 09
barbara
CA421 0700
Base
00001
16COS
SWP 12ooo,CWS Large ,Perchlorate 'uglL 2oo3_0SMay 4 <MRL o o

santa 'CA42107oo 'Vandenberg Air Force
OBNI34W
o
CA 09
barbara Base 00002 16J02
SWP 12000CWS Large Perchlorate :uglL 2oo3_0SMay 4 <MRL o
-09
santa CA4210700
Vandenberg Air Force
00003
OBNl34W
SWP 12000CWS Large Perchlorate ug/L 2oo3_0SMay <MRL o
CA 4
barbara Base 16G04
Page 1 of page B
PWS
PWS wlo
count data
count
CA solano CA481oo15 '00003 481oo15-OO3,SW 32000, CINS Large Perchlorate ;ugll 2001_01Jan <MRL
I
° °
Travis Air Force Base·
CA 09 solano CA481oo15 00003 4810015-003'SW 32000CINS Large ·Perchlorate lug/L 2oo1_07Jul 4 <MRL
Vallejo
° °
Travis Air Force Base·
CA .09 solano CA481oo15 00003 j4810015-OO3SW 32000. CINS Large Perchlorate '2oo1_100ci 4 <MRL
Vallejo
°
CA 'CA4810701 'Travis Air Force Base Large No Data
.NM3567701 KIRTLAND AIR FORCE

NM 'Large .No Data
BASE
OH 05 greene 'OH2903312 WRIGHT-PATTERSON EPI !Large ,Perchlorate '2002_07Jul 4 !<MRL

AFB, 'B' .00013
° °
,OH2903312WRlGHT-PATTERSON
OH 05 greene 00014 EP2 GW 12045 CINS Large !Perchlorale ugIL '2oo2_07Jul 4 .<MRL
.AFB. 'B'
° °
OH 05 ,greene !OH2903312 WRIGHT-PATTERSON EPI GW 12045CINS Large ,Perchlorate 2oo2_02Feb 4 <MRL
AFB, 'B' 00013
° °
OH 05 greene .OH2903312 WRlGHT-PATTERSON 00014 EP2 GW 12045 CINS Large Perchlorate iuglL ,2oo2_02Feb 4 17.2
. AFB, 'B'
°
OH 05 .greene OH2903412 WRIGHT-PATTERSON EP3 GW 15160 CINS Large ·Perchlorate 'uglL '2oo2_02Feb 4 <MRL
AFB AREA AlC 00014
° °
OH '05 .greene OH2903412 WRIGHT-PATTERSON EPI GW 15160CINS !Large ,Perchlorate
i ugll ,2002_07Jul 4 <MRL
AFB AREA AJC 00013
° °
OH2903412 WRIGHT-PATTERSON
OH 05 greene AFB AREA AlC .00013 EPI GW 15160.CINS !Large ·Perchlorate
i
Ugfl 2oo2_02Feb 4 '<MRL
° °
OH 05 greene OH2903412 WRIGHT-PATTERSON
EP2 GW 15160'CINS Large ,Perchlorate IUgll 2002_02Feb 4 <MRL '0
AFB AREA AlC 00016
°
OH 05 ,greene OH2903412 WRIGHT-PATTERSON EP2 GW 15160CINS Large ·Perchlorate iUgfl 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL
AFB AREA AlC 00016
° °
OH 05 greene OH2903412 WRIGHT-PATTERSON ,
EP3 .GW 15160CINS Large Perchlorate ugll 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL
AFB AREA AJC 00014
° °
OH '05 greene OH2903412 WRIGHT-PATTERSON EP4 GW 15160' CINS Large ,Perchlorate uglL 2002_02Feb 4 <MRL
AFB AREA AlC 00015
° °
OH 05 greene OH2903412 WRIGHT·PATTERSON
EP4 GW 15160, CINS Large ,Perchlorate ,ugll 2002_07Jul 4 <MRL
AFB AREA AlC 00015
°
KELLY AIR FORCE
TX
TXOI50113 GW
21506cINS .Large No Dala
BASE
LACKLAND AIR FORCE

TX
TXOI50114 GW
20640CINS Large No Dala
BASE
Page 2 of page 8
PWS
PWS w/o
count data
count
GW 11820CWS Large 1 1
SHEPPARD AIR FORCE

TX TX243OOO7 SWP 12810'CWS Large NaData
BASE
UT4900513 HILL AIR FORCE BASE 00009T 0602409 SWP 22OS2CWS Large 'Perchlorate
UT 'OS davis
,ugiL 2001_100et 4 <MRL 0 0
,- , .
;
~~,
UT 08 davis UT4900513 HILL AIR FORCE BASE 00002T 0602402 SWP 22OS2CWS Large ,Perchlorate !uglL 2001_100et 4 <MRL 0 0
;
UT OS davis UT4900513 ,HILL AIR FORCE BASE 00008T 060240S SWP 22082cws Large Perchlorate iuglL 2001_100cl 4 <MRL 0 0
,··,~c
UT OS ~davis UT4900513 HILL AIR FORCE BASE00002T 0602402 SWP 22OS2CWS 'Large Perchlorate uglL 2001_05May 4 '<MRL 0 0
,- ~"
UT OS davis UT4900513 HILL AIR FORCE BASEOOOO8T 0602408 SWP 22OS2CWS Large Perchlorate 'ugIL 2001_0SMay 4 <MRL 0 0
,
UT 08 davis UT4900513 HILL AIR FORCE BASE 00009T 0602409 SWP 22OS2CWS 'Large Perchlorate ugIL 2001_0SMay 4 <MRL #REF! #REF!
"FAiRCHILD AIR FORCE

WA WA5324350 GW 11227 CWS 'Large No Data
BASE
Page 3 of page 8
PWS
PWS wlo
count data
'-','·,_""x,', "r" u'_"~"'""'j" . 1 N_'"O' ~ . ! "-"N~~M;?r . .~.-y lr~ 'w. , . count
NavylMarine Corps UCMR Data From EPA UCMR POC
Lemoore Naval Air

CA CA161 0700 SW 10363CWS Large NoData
Station
CA CA3610703 USMC Twentynine Palms GW 17oo0CWS Large No Data
CA CA3710700 Camp Pendleton (North) GW 11620'CWS Large No Data
CA iCA371 0702 'Camp Pendleton (South) GW 33000iCWS Large No Data
,Corry Field - Naval Air

H FL1170814 GW 17192CWS Large No Data
'Stalion
Mayport Naval Stalion

;
H 04 duval ,FL2160734 08001 :32228 GW 14642CWS 'Large Perchlorate lugiL ,2oo3_02Feb 4 :<MRL a a
(Mainside)
-,-~-~«,. " ""'~'·'·'·'V·=~"V' _ '"
!~ ~-
,Mayport Naval Stalion
FL '04 duval FL2160734 08001 '32228 GW 14642:CWS :Large 'Perchlorate '2oo3_07Jul 4 <MRL 1 a
(Malnside)
"'.VN·
iJacksonville Naval Air

FL 04 'duval FL2161212 08001 32212 GW 20000:CWS jLarge Perchlorate iug/L :2oo3_07Jul 4 <MRL a a
Ssalion
H 04 duval FL2161212
Jacksonville Naval Air
Ssalion
08001 32212 GW 20000CWS Large ,Perchlorate jug/l 2oo3_02Feb 4 <MRL a a
FL 04 duval FL2161212 08002 83668 GW 20000CWS Large :Perchlorate ;uglL 2oo3_02Feb 4 <MRL a a
Ssalion
FL 04 duval FL2161212 08002 83868 GW 20000CWS Large Perchlorate ugiL 2oo3_07Jul 4 '<MRL 1 a
Ssalion
GU GUOOOOO10 U.S. Navy Water System SW 143oo,CWS ,Large No Data
GREAT LAKES NAVAL

IL 05 lake IL0975227 16173 TAP_at SW 31637:CWS ,Large ,Perchlorate !ugIL '2003_02Feb 4 <MRL a a
TRAINING STATION
GREAT LAKES NAVAL
IL 05 lake ,IL0975227 16173 TAP_01 SW 3163TCWS Large ,Perchlorate iugIL 2oo3_11Nov 4 <MRL a a
TRAINING STATION
GREAT LAKES NAVAL
IL 05 lake IL0975227 16173 TAP_01 SW 3163TCWS Large ,Perchlorate :uglL ,2oo3_05May 4 ,<MRL a a
TRAINING STATION
GREAT LAKES NAVAL
IL 05 lake IL0975227 16173 TAP_01 SW 31637 CWS Large ,Perchlorate !ug/L 2oo3_08Aug 4 <MRL 1 a
TRAINING STATION
Patuxent Naval Air
MD ,MD0180022 GW 11722CWS 'Large No Data

Station (NAWCAD)
USMC LEJEUNE·
NC NC0467041 GW 35000:CWS Large No Data

HADNOT POINT
USMC Lejune • New
NC NC0467042 GW 11500CWS Large No Data

River Air Station
USMC LEJEUNE·
NC NC0467043 GW 17000CWS Large No Data

HOLCOMB BLVD.
Page 4 of page 8
PWS
PWS w/o
count data
count
QUANTICO MARINE
VA VA6153675 SW 13012 CWS large No Data
BASE - MAINSIDE
WA 10 kitsap WA5302714 SUBASE BANGOR 70090 70Q9C GW 15843CWS large Perchlorate 'ug/l 2003_05May 4 <MRl 0 0
WA ,10 xitsap WA5302714 SUBASE BANGOR 70510 7051Cl GW 15843CWS large Perchlorate lug/l 2003_05May 4 ,<MRL 0 0
WA 10 k~sap WA5302714 SUBASE BANGOR 70510 7051Cl GW 15843,CWS large Perchlorate lug/l '2003_12Dec 4 <MRL 0 0
!
WA 10 .k~sap WA5302714SUBASE BANGOR 70090 70Q9C GW 15843,CWS ,Large Perchlorate fUg/l '2003_12Dec I 4 <MRL 1 0
Page 5 of page 8
PWS
PWS wlo
count data
count
Amy UCMR Data From EPA UCMR POC
AK
AK2212039 ,Fort Richardson SW 11500CWS Large
No Data
AK
'AK2310918 Fort Wainwright GW 12000'CWS Large
No Data
'04 madison :AL0000899 ius Army Aviation & oooo1T ,0899001 'SW 21180,CWS Large
Perchlorate IUgiL 2001_12Dec 4 <MRL
'AL
MiSsile Command
° °
madison
ALOOOOB99 'us Amy Aviation & 00002T ,0899002 SW 21180CWS ,Large
,Perchlorate iUgIL 2001_12Dec 4 <MRL
AL :04 ,Missile Command i
° °
AL0000899 :US Army Aviation &
I
'04 madison oooo2T '0899002 SW 21180CWS 'Large
i Perchlorate 'UgIL 2002_03Mar 4 <MRL
AL Missile Command
° °
US Army Aviation & ,sw
,AL [madison ,ALOOOOB99 oooo1T '0899001 21180,CWS ,Large
i Perchlorate 'ugiL :2002_03Mar 4 <MRL
:04 Missile Command
° °
,US Army Aviation &
04 madison AL0000899 oooo1T ,0899001 SW 21180 CWS ,Large
,Perchlorate fUgIL '2001_09Sep 4 <MRL
'AL Missile Command
° °
US Army Aviation &
04 madison ALOOOOB99 oooo2T 0899002 SW 21180CWS Large
,Perchlorate 2001_06Jun 4 <MRL
AL
Missile Command 1"9/1.
° °
US Army Aviation &
'04 21180,CWS 'Large
AL imadison . ALOOOOB99
Missile Command
oooo1T 0899001 SW Perchlorate
iuglL :2001_06Jun 4 '<MRL
° °
US Army Aviation &
04 ALOOOOB99 00002T 0899002 SW 21180CWS 'Large
Perchlorate ,Ug/L 2001_09Sep 4
AL madison
Missile Command
'<MRL
°
'GW
° o
'AL '04 'dale ,AL0001489 Fort Rucker '00005T 1489004 18000,CWS 'Large Perchlorate ;uglL '2002_02Feb 4 <MRL
I
AL 04 dale AL0001489 Fort Rucker oooo3T 1489002 GW 18000,CWS Large i Perchlorate lugll ;2002_02Feb 4 i<MRL
;
"
° °
AL 04 'dale 'AL0001489 'Fort Rucker 00004T ,1489003 GW 18000,CWS ,Large ]Perchlorate
i;"9/1. 2002_02Feb 4 <MRL o o
04 dale AL0001489 Fort Rucker oooon '1489006 GW 18000CWS Large Perchlorate uglL i2002_02Feb 4 <MRL
AL
° °
AL 04 dale AL0001489 Fort Rucker oooo8T 1489007 GW 18000CWS Large Perchlorate ;Ug/L 2002_02Feb 4 ,<MRL o
°
04 dale ,AL0001489 'Fort Rucker 00006T 1489005 GW 18000 CWS Large Perchlorate :uglL 2002_02Feb 4 <MRL o
AL
°
AL 04 dale AL0001489 Fort Rucker oooo3T 1489002 GW 18000'CWS Large Perchlorate 2002_07Jul 4 <MRL
,uglL
° °
,04 AL0001489 Fort Rucker 00004T 1489003 GW 18000CWS ,Large Perchlorate ugiL 2002_07Jul 4 <MRL
AL ,dale
° °
04 AL0001489 Fort Rucker oooo5T 1489004 GW 18000CWS 'Large Perchlorate 2002_07Jul 4 <MRL
AL dale "9/1.
° °
'04 AL0001489 Fort Rucker oooon 1489006 GW 18000CWS Large Perchlorate ug/L 2002_07Jul 4 <MRL
AL dale
° °
Page 6 of page 8
PWS
PWS wlo
count data
count
AL 04 dale :ALOOO1489 ,Fort Rucker 00008T 1489007 GW 18000CIIVS Large

Perchlorate 'uglL 2002_07Jul 4 <MRL
°
°
AL 04 dale ALOOO1489 Fort Rucker 00006T 1489005 GW 18000CIIVS Large
Perchlorate 'ugIL 2002_07Jul 4 <MRL o
AZ AZ0402078 Fort Huachuca GW 15603CIIVS Large

'No Data
Camp Roberts •
CA ,CA2710705 California National GW 20370 CIIVS Large
!No Data
Guard
CA CA3610705 Fort Irwin !GW 13092!CIIVS !Large

,No Data
GA 04 'liberty !GA1790024 !Fort Stewart - Main 01472 301 GW 21000' CIIVS 'Large
,Perchlorate ugIL :2002_06Jun 4 o
°
GA 04 ,liberty GA1790024 :Fort Stewart - Main 03468 303 GW 21000CIIVS !Large
Perchlorate 'ugiL ',2002_06Jun 4 '<MRL o o
GA '04 liberty GA1790024 Fort Stewart - Main 01472 301 GW 21Ooo'CIIVS ,Large
,Perchlorate !ugIL '2002_01 Jan 4 <MRL o o
1
GA 04 liberty 'GA1790024 Fort Stewart· Main '03687 304 GW 21000'CIIVS 'Large
,Perchlorate lugIL ,2002_01 Jan 4 <MRL o
.;
°
GA 04 liberty GA1790024 Fort Stewart· Main 03795 305 ,GW 21000CIIVS ,Large
!Perchlorate !uglL :2002_01 Jan 4 ,<MRL o o
,
GA [04 ,liberty GA1790024 Fort Stewart - Main 02965 ,302 GW 21ooo'CIIVS !Large
Perchlorate 'ugJl :2002_01 Jan 4 <MRL o
°
, i
GA 04 liberty GA1790024 Fort Stewart· Main 03468 303 'GW 21000, CIIVS 'Large
,Perchlorate !ugIL 2002_01 Jan 4 <MRL o o
GA '04 liberty GA1790024 Fort Stewart· Main 03687 304 :GW 21oo0'CIIVS 'Large
:Perchlorate jugiL .2002_06Jun 4 <MRL o
°
'GA 04 ,liberty GA1790024 Fort Stewart - Main 02965 302 GW 21000: CIIVS Large
!Perchlorate !ugIL 2oo2_06Jun 4 <MRL o
GA 'GA2150002 Fort Benning SW 44000CIIVS Large

No Data
GA '04 richmond GA2450028 'Fort Gordon 02054 301 SW 24000CIIVS :Large

Perchlorate ,uglL 2003_07Jul 4 <MRL o o
GA 04 ,richmond ,GA245OO28 Fort Gordon 02054 301 SW 24000CIIVS ,Large

,Perchlorate 'ugIL 2003_04Apr 4 <MRL
° °
GA 04 'richmond GA2450028 Fort Gordon 02054 301 SW 24000CIIVS Large
,Perchlorate 'uglL 2oo3_12Dec <MRL o
°
GA 04 ,richmond GA2450028 Fort Gordon 02054 301 SW 24000, CIIVS Large
Perchlorate uglL 2003_09Sep 4 <MRL o
KS KS2006114 FORT RILEY GW 18000 CIIVS Large

No Data
Page 7 of page 8
PWS
PWS wlo
count data
count
KY KY0470990 ENGINEERING & SW 42400CWS Large No Data

HOUSING
LA LA1115065 South Fort Polk GW 21500CWS Large No Data
FORT GEORGE G;
MD 03 anne arundel: MD002oo12 00001 0100000 SW 50001!CWS VL :Perchlorate ugIL 2oo3_01Jan 4 <MRL 0 0
MEADE
FORT GEORGE G.
MD 03 anne arundel,MDoo20012 00001 0100000 SW SOOOfCWS VL Perchlorate !uglL :2oo2_100cl 4 <MRL 0 0
MEADE
FORT GEORGE G.
MD 03 anne arundeHMD0020012
MEADE
00001 0100000 SW 5000fcws :VL Perchlorate !UgIL :2003_O4Apr 4 <MRL 0 0
FORT GEORGE G.
MO 03 anne arundel:MDOO2oo12 00001 0100000 SW 5OOO1CWS VL Perchlorate iuglL 2oo3_07Jul 4 <MRL 1 0
,MEADE
I
Aberdeen Proving
MD ,M00120002 SW 1200icws Large No Data
Ground - Chapel Hill
MO M03079500 Fort Leonard Wood SW 24000CWS Large I ,, ,No Data
NC 04 cumbe~and NC0326344 FORT BRAGG 00004 EP1 SW 65000CWS VL Perchlorate !ug/L 2oo2_07Jul 4 <MRL 0 0
NC 04 eumbe~an,J NC0326344 FORT BRAGG 00004 EP1 SW 65000CWS VL Perchlorate 2Q03_01Jan 4 <MRL 1 0
NJ INJ0325001 FORTDIX SW 14500CWS Large 'No Data
FORT CAMPBELL
TN TN0000820 SW 40000CWS 'Large 1 No Data
WATER SYSTEM
lJ<; TX0140107 South Fort Hood SVVP 38139CWS Large No Data
TX 'lJ<;0150116 FORT SAM HOUSTON GW 17000iCWS Large No Data 1 1
FORT BLISS MAIN BASE

TX TX0710020 GW 21800:CWS Large No Data
AREA
FORT LEWIS WATER

WA WA5326050 GW 37577CWS Large No Data
CANTONMENT
Page 8 of page 8
SITES THAT APPEAR IN EPA's UCMR DATABASE
BUT NOT IN DoD's UCMR DATA
The following sites appear in EPA's UCMR database, but are NOT included in DoD's
consolidated UCMR spreadsheet. Most of these sites may not need to be included in
DoD's current UCMR data since they report "No Data" in EPA's database under
"Result." However, there are four sites (shown below) that report " <MRL" in EPA's
database under "Result," but do not appear in DoD's consolidated UCMR spreadsheet.
Result = <MRL
• Great Lakes Naval Training Station
• U.S. Army Aviation & Missile Command
• Fort Rucker
• Fort Bragg
Result = No Data
• Elemendorf AFB
• McClellan AFB - Main Base
• Kirtland AFB
• Kelly AFB
• Randolph AFB
• Sheppard AFB
• Corry Field - Naval Air Station
• U.S. Navy Water System (Guam)
• Fort Richardson
• Fort Wainwright
• Camp Roberts - California National Guard
• Fort Irwin
• Fort Knox
• South Fork Polk
• Fort Campbell Water System
• South Ford Hood
• Fort Sam Houston
• Fort Bliss Main Base Area
SITES THAT APPEAR IN DoD's UCMR DATA
BUT NOT IN EPA's UCMR DATABASE
The following sites are included in DoD's consolidated UCMR spreadsheet, but NOT
included in EPA's UCMR database.
• Fort Monroe
• Fort Drum
• Commander u.s. Naval Forces, Marianas
• Coronado Navbase
• El Centro NAF
• Marine Corps Logistics Base Barstow
• NAVAIRWPNSTA cHINA LAKE CA
• Navy Public Works Center (IL)
• Navy Public Works Center, Pearl Harbor
• Pensacola NAS
• Barksdale AFB
• Beale AFB
• CannonAFB
• Davis-Monthan AFB
• Shaw AFB
• HanscomAFB
>
Installations With No Perchlorate Data/Installations Not Reporting
1)98
CONUS +
AK&HI
USA Alexandria VA USA
CONUS +
AK&HI
USA Pineville LA USA
CONUS +
AK& HI
USA Sbub Fl USA

CONUS +
AK&HI
USA WA USA
CONUS +
AK& HI
USA Brownwood TX USA

CONUS +
AK&Hf
USA leon Springs TX USA

CONUS +
AK&tH
USA Butner Ne USA
CONUS.
AK&HI
USA Nevada MO USA
CONUS +
AK& HI
USA Battle Creek MI USA

CONUS +
AK&Hl
• I I USA Kingwood WV USA

CONUS +
AK&HI
lA CONUS.
"""" Johnston USA
AK&HI
USA VA USA
CONUS +
AK&HI
USA East G....nwlch RI USA
CONUS +
AK&HI
USA GA USA
CONUS +
AK&Ht
USA Reisterstown MD USA
CONUS +
AK&tH
USA DeviIB Lake ND USA
CONUS +
AK&Hl
USA Grayling MI USA

CONUS +
AK&HI
USA Bragua OK USA

CONUS·
AKA"I
USA Guo",... WY USA

CONUS +
AK&Ht
USA Heatings NE USA

CONUS +
AK&HI
USA TN USA
CONUS +
AK&HI
USA TX USA
CONUS +
AK&HI
USA Powderly TX USA

CONUS +
AK&H1
USA EHiotf NS USA

CONUS +
1Q~ 1215/2000 I USAF NHV Small Air National Guard Camp MurraY'
faciflly. No ru....y. No
WA ... USA
AK&HI
CONUS +
AK+HI
sb:lred munttiona. Not on
NPl. or BRAe lis". Not
undergotng con..,.,.lon.
Not CERCiA or RCRA
cleanup. Small quantity
generator for buardoua
......;ANGB
USA livermont eA USA
USA 'Por1 Clinton OH USA
USA Rapid City SO USA
USA Warrh.ton OR USA
USA Utfle Flllu. UN USA
USA Hattiesburg MS USA
USA Peek.kitl NY USA
USA Riv.rton UT USA
Page 1 of 12
ea'"
c
0.
&
<;
z
V>
c
g
.!l!
~
~0
N
'0
N
.!!
i "
go
0..
!!
"a
0..
Z
~
'V>
C
~
~
C>
to
t'
0
ill
er.
0
z
U>
i
'"
*~ ~
a'" '5
...
~0 '"
C>
a.'"
~
~
z0
£:
:::
U>
is
'"
.!ll
~
.s;
JnstallatlOns With No Perchlorate Data/InstallatIons Not Reporting
178 11/20J2000 v CERCLA Cape Cod MA 2801 USA
USA Carlisle PA USA
182 1112012000 USAF v CERCLA Cavalier AS NO 58220 USA
. 10/1112000 USN NNV Not Applicable; aoyvlow ID 83803 USA
USA Granit8City IL USA
H / 10/1312000 ,
USA
USN NNY RCRA;BRAC

Char.Con
Charleston
WV
SC
_,. USA
USA
USAF Chal1ott8 NC USA
USN BMville TX USA
USAF Cheyenne WY USA

I
'80 I 1112012000 I USAF V CERCLA elMrAS AK ..704 USA
-
USA Hanover NH USA CONUS +
AK&HI
Other Columbus OH USA CONUS +
AK&HI
USA Champaign IL USA CONUS +
AK&HI
USA Grand.land HE USA CONUS +
AK&HI
USA Corpu. Christi TX USA CONUS +
AK&HI
USAF Madison WI USA CONUS +
AK& HI
USA OldTown ME USA CONUS +
AK&H1
USA Columbus ON USA COHUS+
AK&HI
Othe< Stockton CA USA CONUS +
AK&HI
Oth.r CA USA CONUS +
T..""
AK&HI
Olhe< Momph" TN USA CONUS +
AK&HI
Othe, Ogden UT USA CONUS +
At( & HI
Othe< " PA USA CONUS +
Cumberllind I AK&HI
Olh.. CA USA CONUS +
AK&Hf
Page 5 of 12
g>
'ic.5
Q)
0::
a
z
,g'"
c
rn
~c
'j§ ~
rn
0 '0
~ "'CO>
'"rn
~
a.
a.
~
€
~
~
a
~
jij
1n
E
Installations With No Perchlorate Data/Installations Not Reporting
No No No No Non. of the above; I None of the above;1 None of the ab~e~ I None of the above~ None of the above; No No No No No
No No No No No No No No
No No No No None of the above; INone of the above;1 None of tt.. above; INone of the above;INon. of the above; No No No No No
No No No No Nc>ne of the above; INone of the abow;1 None of the above;-I"None of the ibove;JNone of the above;] No No No No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
T No
No
No No No No Non. of the aboWl; NOM of ltMlabCMI; NOM of the above; None of tIM above; None of the above; No No No No
I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No Non. of the abow; NOM of tIM abow; None of theabow; Nontl of tIM above, None of the abow;
No
No
No
No
No
No
. No
No I No
-
P~e7m12
t.'"
a:
"5
z
~
"0
.tij
~
"
~0 ~
'0
!!
I!!
.,
co
~
f,!
~
&
z0
~
~
"0
~
.E
o
Z
Installations With No Perchlorate Datallnstallations Not Reporting
Othe< Phi"'defphia PA USA
USAF DE USA
USA Dtfroit MI USA
408 7/1212OD1 USN BRAC Novato CA &4947 USA
132 11T312000 USA NNV Brooklyn NV 11252 USA
USN VA USA
Page90f 12
'"c
'E
0
0
'"
a:
i5
z
'"c0
~
~c
~
~
0 '0
J!! ~
I!
~ 'g>"
ll.
~
'"
ll.
0
Z
§
;:
g'"
c
!!1
~
0 0 0
z z z
g>
€
0
0.
"
<r
(;
z
.'"
~
B
g I
ki'"
~
,.
~
~
D g '5
::
z
E!
~
i
"g>
a.
a."
z0
,.
~
8
~ z
'"
~ ~
B i
g
~
,.
~
g
z
,.
~
!0
z
f
,.
~
g
z
~
0
z z0
o o
z z
o
z
i
a.
';-
J /99
FACILITY NAME HAS FACILITY USED TYPE OF HAS SAMPLING FOR RESULTS OF ANY COMMENTS EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
EQUIPMENT, MUNITIONS EQUIPMENT, PERCHLORATE SAMPLING,
OR WEAPONRY BELIEVED MUNITIONS OR OCCURRED? INCLUDING
TO CONTAIN WEAPONRY USED DETECTION
PERCHLORATE LEVEL
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Yes Yes 0-23 ppb

23 ppb at the western
boundary well; 1 ppb at the
City of Aberdeen well; GW 3.4
to 10.9 ppb; soil 15 ppb;.
product well water 0.4 to 5
ppb.
AIR FORCE PLANT 4 Yes Ejection seats, flares, Yes NO
chaff
AIR FORCE PLANT 14 Not Reported
AIR FORCE PLANT 44 Yes Rockets, propellants Yes NO
AIR FORCE PLANT 70 Not reported Rockets, propellants No Not Applicable
AIR FORCE PLANT PJKS Yes Rockets Yes NO

ALBANY MCLB Not reported
ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LAB Yes Yes 100-400 ppb
Discharge into surface water is
between 100-400 ppb
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE Yes Grenades No Not Applicable
ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable Yes NO
ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT Not reported
ARDEC (PICATINNYARSENAL) Yes Yes 627 ppb Sampled at the Open
detonation & propellant
manufacuturinglload facility -
GW averages approx. 170
ppm near the hogout facility
ARKANSAS ORO PLANT Not reported
ATLANTIC CITY AIRPORT Not reported
AVCO LYCOMING SF SITE Not reported
BANGORNSB Yes No Not Applicable
BARSTOW MCLB Not reported
BEDFORD NWIRP No Not Applicable
BLAINE NAVAL AMMUNITION Not reported
DEPOT
BRUNSWICK NAS Yes Yes
CAMP LEJEUNE MCB Yes No Not Applicable
CAMP PENDLETON MCB Yes No Not Applicable
CHERRY POINT MCAS No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
COLTS NECK NWS EARLE Yes No Not Applicable
CONCORDNWS No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
CORNHUSKER AAP Not reported
DAHLGREN NSWC Yes No Not Applicable
00 SAN JOAQUIN, SHARPE Not reported
FACILITY
00 SAN JOAQUIN, TRACY FACILITY Not reported
DOVER AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable No Not Applicable

DSC RICHMOND Not reported
EAU CLAIRE OP #1 Not reported
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE Yes Rocket propellant Yes 36,000 ppb
testing
EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE Yes Demolition & Burn No Not Applicable
Facility
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE Yes EODRange Yes NO
(munitions)
ELMENDORF AIR FORCE BASE Yes EOD Range No Not Applicable
(munitions), Grenades
FAIRCHILD AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable No Not Applicable

FORTDIX No
FORT EUSTIS Yes No Not Applicable
FORT LEWIS Yes
FORT RICHARDSON No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
FORT RILEY No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
FORT WAINWRIGHT No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
FRANCIS E WARREN AIR FORCE Yes Mortars, cannons No Not Applicable
BASE
FTCROWDER No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE Yes Pyrotechnics, smoke No Not Applicable
grenades
HILL AIR FORCE BASE Yes Rocket motor testing Yes 70ppb
IL ORDNANCE PLT (CRAB Not reported

ORCHARD)
INDIAN HEAD NSWC Yes Yes 170ppb GW concentrations near the
hogout facility average approx.
170 ppb
IOWA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT Information Not Available Yes (By EPA) 9ppb
JACKSONVILLE NAS Yes No Not Applicable
JET PROPULSION LAB Yes Yes
JOLIET AAP - KANKAKEE Information Not available
KEYPORT NUWC Yes No Not Applicable

KINGSBURY ORDNANCE PLANT Not reported
LAKE CITY AAP Yes Yes 73 ppb Monitoring well· 73 ppb; soil
15 ppb
LAKE LOUISE Not reported
LAKEHURST NAWCAD Not reported
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE Yes EOD Range Yes NO
(munitions)
LARSON AIR FORCE BASE Not reported
LlTILE CREEK NAB Not reported
LONESTARMP Yes Yes 8.8ppb Soil at production plant (8.8
ppb) and GW at burning
ground (8 ppb)
LONGHORNMP Yes Yes 169-247 ppm GW ranges from 4 to 64,500
(should be 4-64,500 ppb; soils range from 25 to
ppb?) 45,000 ppb
LOUISIANA MP Not reported
LUKE AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
MALTA TEST STA Not reported
MANCHESTER ANNEX Not reported
MARATHON BAT PLT Not reported
MASSACHUSETIS MILITARY Yes Yes 300ppb GW monitoring wells 17.7 ppb
RESERVATION (MMR) (May 2001) to 3.7 ppb (Jan
2003); offsite well detection at
1.75 ppb in May 2003
MCCHORD AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable No Not Applicable

MCGUIRE AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
MECHANICSBURG SPCC Not reported
MIDDLETOWN AIR DEPOT Not reported
MILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT Information Not Available
MORGANTOWN OW Not reported

MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE Yes EODRange No Not Applicable
BASE (munitions)
NANSEMOND ORO DEPOT Not reported
NAV STATION TODD-TACOMA Not reported
NEBRASKA ORDNANCE PLANT No Not Applicable Yes 24ppb
Army reports EPA has been
investigating this site because it
was a fireworks manufacturing
facility for approximately 20 years
subsequent to DoD use. There
has been no basis or historical
record to suspect 000
perchlorate usage.
NEW HANOVER CNTY ARPT Not reported
NEW LONDON NSB Yes
NEWPORT NETC Not reported
NORFOLK COMNAVBASE Not reported
NORFOLKNSY Not reported
PANTEX ORDNANCE (DOE) Not reported
PANTEX ORDNANCE PLANT (TX Not reported
TECH)
PARRIS ISLAND MCRD Not reported
PATUXENT RIVER NAS Yes No Not Applicable
PEARL HARBOR FISC Not reported
PEARL HARBOR INACTSHIPDET Not reported
PEARL HARBOR NS Yes No Not Applicable
PEARL HARBOR NSB No Not Applicable
PEARL HARBOR NSY No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
PEARL HARBOR PWC Not reported
PENSACOLA NAS Not reoorted
PORT HADLOCK NOC PAC D1V DET Not reported
PORTSMOUTH NSY No Not Applicable No Not Applicable

PUGET SOUND FISC BREMERTON No Not Applicable
PUGET SOUND NAVHOSP No Not Applicable

BREMERTON
PUGET SOUND NSY Not reported
QUANTICO MCB Not reported
REDSTONE ARSENAL Yes Yes 37-19,000 ppb 2 plumes with elevated
perchlorates; soil
contamination
RIVERBANK ARMY AMMO PLANT Information Not Available

ROBINS AIR FORCE BASE Yes Stored munitions No Not Applicable
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL Not reported
SAN BER ENGR DEPOT Not reported
SANGAMO ORDNANCE PLANT Not reported
SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER Not reported

ST JULIEN'S CREEK ANNEX Not reported
STROTHER FIELD Not reported
SUNFLOWER AAP Not reported
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE Yes Rocket motors, No Not Applicable
Cartridge actuated
devices, propellant
actuated devices
TOBYHANNA AD No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
TODD-SEATILE DRYDOCK INC Not reported
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
TUCSON INTERNATIONAL Not reported
AIRPORT
TWIN CITIES AAP Not reported
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
WAHIAWA NCTAMS EASTPAC Not reported
WASHINGTON NAVY YARD Not reported
WELDON SPRING ORD WORKS Not reported
WEST VIRGINIA ORD WORKS Not reported
WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS Not reported
WHITING FIELD NAS No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
WILLIAMSBURG FISC CHEATHAM No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
ANNEX
WILLOW GROVE AIR FORCE Yes Munitions No Not Applicable
RESERVE
WILLOW GROVE NAS Not reported
WRIGHT PATTERSON AIR FORCE Yes Rockets. munitions Yes NO
BASE
YORKTOWN NWS No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
YUMA MCAS Yes No Not Applicable
ReQueatorlRtKIU9SlorlEntereet having open\Entered havingIEntered
having IEntered having Entered having IHoUoed &lor IHouood &lor
,propellont teoting die_ad of "'epooedof
Hou..d&lor Hou..d&Ior Houoed&lor IHouoed &lor IGroundwater SoUe....pIed for
d1epooedof d1epooed of oampled for perchlorate?
s Fax a email bumfopen detonaUon7 ordnance andfor ordnance ancfor propellaint cn.pooecl of dtaposedof
Number rocket motor rocket motornMnO'lal1 and/or a rocket motora, tactJcal munltlons munitions munltlons other materials? perchlorate?
maintenance? _ng? laboratory? CADe, & PADo? m'"Ileo? Nomenclature? DoOlC? NSN?
Ves Ves ,Ves ~ iNo
No No No No No No
No No No No No No
'No 'No 'No No No
No No No No No No
Surf__ter
Sediment Plana for aampling Whenaampltng W..... R4tqu••tors If sampled. aw.... If sampled. were State and If not sa"",led, why?
sampled 10< sampled 10< Ifnot lIIready Ifnot_ady onalylIlo In_ ofStalaond Federal Agencies Involved?
perchlorate? perchlorate? req....tod Flldoral
Requireme"'?
No No No No Nol required by the

regulator.
No No
No No No No No evidence nor
documentation of B release.
,.
No No
No No No No No regul.lory requirement
Installation Name IDatabbe 10 .... R"".Od/'nObi'IaUO
Number n Service
Agency
r;rtlIod r0tan..IOn SlMu. ICky IS- r p
Code ICOUntry indudlng r rr
Ubmlltar
CONUS Name
AK & HI or
OCONUS
ISUbmlltar
on
Ubmlltar ommand
Organlzatl Phone Ing Officer Icommand
Number Phone
Number
IMalor
Ing OffIcer Command [Primary
POC
Name
132/ 1113/2000/USA -INNV I IBroo!dyn INY I 112521USA CONUS +

iAK+HI
USN VA iUSA CONUS +

'AK&HI
247' 1111712000IUSAF NNV RCRA;ANGB Dulu1h MN 558111uSA CONUS +
'AK+HI
137 111312000IUSAF Form.. TAC base, IDulu1h MN 5580fluSA CONUS +

10000th AFB. Joint use AK+ HI
faci1Ity,DUIu1h in 1ha'
AP and M ANG.;
IANGB
Primary
POC
Secondar ISecOlldar Contracto ICOnlr8CtO Icontracto Contracto leoRtraeto IContracto IConb-acto IContracto IRequesto'lRequestorlRequestor
y POC Fax y POC r POe r , Addnt•• , Phon. , Altern... r Fu. r Email r Are. of • Name • Addre.. a Phone
Addre•• INumbet' Email Name Company Number IPhone INumber I lR••pons.b Number
Name Number Illy
Requestor/Requestor/Entered having open
IEntered having IEntOred having IEntered having
Entered having IHoused &lor Hou••d&I« Housed &lor HouHd&Jor Hou..d&Jor Houeed &lor IGroundwater Soli o...pIod for
perchlorate?
• Fax • Em'" bum/open detondon? onfnance andfor ordnance and/or propellant propellant testing eIlo_d of 'ell_dol dlopooed of $pooadof I$pooed of ,disposed of .ampled fot
Number rocket motor rocket motor removal? andlor a rocket motors.. ltactlcal munltlon. munitions munitions. other moterialo? perohlorate?
maintenance? testing? laboratory? CAo., & PACe? mini"'? Nomenclature? DoOIC? NSN?
,No -No-- No
No No
No No No No No
No No No No No
No No No INo No
Surface water _ t Plan. lor ....pling When aampHng Was.n RequHtore If .ampled. alWare If aampkKf. were Sblte and II not aompled, why?
.ampladfo< sampled lor ifnot ••ody If not a'ready analyala Information olStlltoand Federal Agenclee Invotved?
perchlorllto? perchlorllle? reqU8lJted Federal
Requirements?
No No
No No
No No No No
No No No Minnesota PoIIulion Conbol

Agency (MPCA), Jane Moaol (651
296-7813) and Mlks B..... (851
297-8599.
mlke.bares@pc8.elate.IDn.us)
In.tallatlonN_me IData_ IDaIe R_lved IlnotailollO
Number n Service
.gency
Verified tnstallation Statu.. City State ZipCodo Country CONUS SubmllfA>, Submltt.:r Submitter
Includlng N.... Organlzotl Phone com=r
AK&Hlor
OCONUS
on Number
omm d
IMajor
Ing Officer log OffIcer
Phone
Number
r 1mory
.. Comtn-nd POe
N~
1110120011uSAF NNV RCRA Dyes.AFB TX 79607 USA CONUS +

'AK+HI
Primary Prim..,.
,POC POC
IAddreaa Phone
Number
Prim..,.
Number
IPrlm. ,. ISeconila,
POC Fox POC Emoill POC
y I_do,
Name Add,... Phone
IAl_tea'rn.
Iy POe ySecondo,
POC YPOC
Number Phone
ISoconder .'Secondo' Controcto IContraeto Contraeto IContracto lcontroeto Icontrocto
y POe Fox YPOC
Number Email ',POe
Name "Company
N.....
r Add..... r Phone r Alternate r Fax
Number Phone Number
'Number
r Email
lCOntroct0lrcontA r of:JRei• Name
R••ponslb
Iitty
luoat"'iRoqUeOt
8
ci'IRoq....Io'
Addltll... Phone
Number
NJI~
R.-queaor fRtHl"estorlEbum/open
ntered having open I.Ent.ered having IEmeNd having lEntered having En....d hovlng IHOUoed &1« IHouoed &I.,. _&lor Houoed&lor Houoed&lor HouMd &lor IGroundwablf SoII ....pled for
• Fax • Email ct.tonlltfon? ordnanc» andfar ordnance edlor propellant propellant ",.lIng diopaMd of d1spooed of dl.pooed 01 dIopooedof dI8poHdof d1spooed of sampled for perchlorate?
Number rocket motorrocket motor removal? andIor 8 rocket motoN, tactlcBf munttlofta· munlUons munitions· other materlafa'perchlorat.?
malmen.nee? testing? t_,...OfY? CADs, & PADll? ml_? Nomenclature? DoOle? NSN?
No No No ~ No
Surf__m
s.ctImont Pions 1m ..",piing When a"",.,Ung Waaan Requestors If sampled, aware tf aampled. were State end If no' ""'"J'Ied, why?
..mpledlor oompled lor Ifnot .....dy If not all. .dy .n8'Yt'1. InfonnatJon ofState.nd Federal Agenctealrwolved'?
percblonde? perchlorate? requested Federal
Requirements?
No No No No OUR OBIOD Site has

alrElSdy been investigated
and closed. Tha lab used
EPA method 8330 10 chacl<
for explosives. We have no
history01 parchlorata
contamination at any other
eite nor do we heve 8
regulatory requirement 10
check for parchlorates.
=
Total Sites 0
NONE
NONE
'&rmit~0020371, 'onthly Nona ibutlet 001 {WTP Effluent At Sila I} PA 314 r 780·5'30 ,roundwater treatment P'ant discharge
Industrial waste water,
SSOltary and storm water
lLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY '&m1il#WVOO20371, fNo legsl basis defined in permll !uarterly None fOutJe' 280 (STP1) JrPA 31. r 75·2".700 5011lhis afftuent is rouled 10 sites 282, 283. and
IOOustnal waste weter, SSl-2 before being dlScherged to the North
samtsl">I and storm water Branch Potomac
NQ1571 ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY Iwv Permit #VVVOO20371, INo legal basis defined in permit Quarterly None Outlet 280M (EWWT Plant) EPA 314 130.000.0 ~ Teo, This sample is taken from 'the effluent of the
lndustll81 waste water. 210,000 explosives waste treatment plant wtlich then
sanitary and storm waler goes to the sanilary sewer for treatment (~,.
N01571 IAllEGANY BALLIStiCS LABORATORY Iwv I 3 IPermittlWVOO20371, INo Ieg81 basis defined in permit (Quarterly
_e Outlet 282 (Fitter8ackwash @ 344) EPA 314 860-570
280), then 10 sites 282,283, and SSL-2
before being dlSch8rged to the North Bl'8nch
Potomec
2531Ttlis effluel"ll is rout&d 10 sile SSl·2 befo...
Induslr181 waste water, bemg discherged to tha North Brench
sanita and stOfTll water Potomac
~1571 IALlEGANY BAlLISTICS LABORATORY Iwv I 3 IPermit #WVOO20371, No legel basis'i~ defined in permit Quarterly None Outlet 283 (EDIRO Reject@ 344) EPA 314 I 100 0 - 1,800 517'fThis affluent is routed to site SSl~2 before
Industrial w~aste waler, belllg d~hef96d 10 the North 8rer1Ct'I
sEmite and storm waler Potomac
Ng1511 IALLEGANY BALLISTICS lA80RAl"ORV Iwv t 3 IPermittIWVOO20371, Perchlorate not required in permit None SSl-l (Plant Drainage System) EPA, 314 I 9 8·40 251'NPOES discherye
Induslfial waste weter,
N01S71 I ALLEGANY BAlliSTICS lABORATORY Iwv I 3

sanita and storm water
IPermit tl'lWOOZ037 1,
Industnal waste weier,
No legal basls is d&fined in the permit OUBrtel1y None SSl-2 (Plant 1 Drainage System) EPA 314 , -g 2 ·600
levy IMeOOSO (Former Marine Corps Air Station, EI Toro ICA I 0

sanitary and storm water
jPermit t#CAG918001
0'
Discharge heeled
ro
the permit which idenlifies perchlorate
I
specific ~el ....... pro"'ded in We.kly 41Centrel Treatment S\I$tsm EPA 314 I 5.4-9
groundwater a$ an 8unJ89u'ate<l~ chen\lcal, 5t$llng

th$t it ISflllisted in lhe Califomla
Toxies Rule and no Mels ha.-e been
established, an ~.ppropnele8ection
lew! hes been established
'/;IVY 1M60050 IFormer Marine Corps Air Station, EI Toro ICA I 0 IPermit *CAG918001 No specific IegaJ basis is provided in Weekly 411RP Site 2 Trsetmenl EPA 314 ND~8
DIscharge of trealed the permit, which Identifies perchlorate
groundwatef as an 8unregulated" chemICal, statmg
that it Isn't listed In the California
ToJUcs Rule end 00 MCls he.-e been
8stabbshed; an "appropriate~ectlon
level has been established
levy IMe2535 (Former Menne Corps Air Stllltion, Tostin ICA I 0 lPermit #CAG918001,
DIscharge of treated
No specific legal baSIS is pro'o'ided in IWeekly 41MTBE Groundwater Treatment
Syst.m (UST Site 222~ - NPDES
EPA 314 N, NOIThe MI8E groundweter mtatmenl 5~em
tM permit, which identifies perchlorate conSists of en advanced oxidation eoo GAC
groundWater as an -unragul81ed" chemICal, steting bioremedlation svstem Curl1lntly, shaUow
that it isn't listed in the Califoml8 groundwater is eXlracled from 6 wens wlthm
TOXICS Rule and 00 MCls ha.-e been the canter of a MT8E groundweter plume
established; an "9ppropriat9~action resuling from 98801108 ~rege operatlOns.t
Iewl has been established UST Site 222 The current system flow rete
ranges from fj~2 gpm aoo the effluent
MfBE concenlrations lire below 1he
laboratory detection bm4s l"he sampling fOl
perchlorate is PllIrt of the weekly NPOES
dISCharge reqUirements At no time during the
history of MeAS Tustin has perctllorete been
stored or utilized
New Total Sites - 10

AMC-JMC Ilone Star Army Ammunition Plant [TX I 6 IT eX8sPDES permit #02263, TPDES 4 times during storm wllier e.-ents 4 Surface Wa'er discharge from High IEPA3.14 NaPerchlorate Itdded to TPOES because
Storm Water ISSUed E);plosive Demolition Grouoo and perchklrete was discowd al ne'9hbonng
12/16t02 High Explosll.4t BurnIng Ground installation, RRAD If perchklrale IS
discoll8red et LSAAP, stale Will reqUIre
submission of 8 Pollution PreventiOn Plen for
the Conlrol of Pe'tchk:iratewithrn 180 deys
after detection
ony IIMAlSVVRO IRed River Army Depol ITX I 6 )TPDES permn # 02206,
Siorm Waler
TPDES, Storm Waler P2 Plan Quarterty Notice 0 storm water runno" at 4 sites in the EPA 314
detecbo 08/00aree
I N[).15 St8le requires submdion of • PollutIon
Prewntion Plan for the Conlrol of Perctllorsle
with'" 180 days after detec1lOn Nole US
A.fTTlY planmng misSIle motor propellent gnnd
out fllcllity at RRAD, which could lal1jely
replece the open burnmg demllitSlltsllon
requirement for some miSSile s.yslems
(7
nny ARNG ICemp NavajO AZ Permd #982347, Slorm
Waler
Storm Weier, NPDES Monthly 10Jefflu&nt EPA 314 Og 103
-l
.
Am1\' Total Sites = 3
{ -'-:;f
o
P898 t of 1 Dala Comhlom Selvlces NPDES NPDES
OonlUna Water· Perchlorate Sampling Data Call
Ragulotory
EPA 'erohIoo'* '-'""I
.......... N_
sw. JIeofon
Driver Com~~orR.NnnQ.
CItecr'· --I......'
1s1 round of samphng was conducted In Jul 01. 2nd round of

sampling was waived on 4 Sep 02 by DHS. exception of Chromium
'Of
VI No further sampling required it consists 01 only 2 fOUnds
1at round=<4ppbI2nd raundld81a collection PUI'pOS88 for future use If they become Regulated
iEX: Smilh Gun 88M CA 10 7/18/2001 EPAUCMR I _bvDHS Contaminants,
• Please specify if rhe sample was collected from \Yell head. enby point of distribution system. other
.. Idenfttv any Stale Of local requirements that have mandated ssmpli
LJ\! W
J: --1::
.,L
('
~
FACILITY NAME HAS FACILITY USED TYPE OF HAS SAMPLING FOR RESULTS OF ANY COMMENTS EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
EQUIPMENT. MUNITIONS EQUIPMENT. PERCHLORATE SAMPLING.
OR WEAPONRY BELIEVED MUNITIONS OR OCCURRED? INCLUDING
TO CONTAIN WEAPONRY USED DETECTION
PERCHLORATE LEVEL
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Yes Yes 0-23 ppb

23 ppb at the western
boundary well; 1 ppb at the
City of Aberdeen well; GW 3.4
\
to 10.9 ppb; soil 15 ppb;
product well water 0.4 to 5
ppb.
AIR FORCE PLANT 4 Yes Ejection seats, flares, Yes NO
chaff
AIR FORCE PLANT 14 Not Reported
AIR FORCE PLANT 44 Yes Rockets, propellants Yes NO
AIR FORCE PLANT 70 Not reported Rockets, propellants No Not Applicable
AIR FORCE PLANT PJKS Yes Rockets Yes NO

ALBANY MCLB Not reported
ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LAB Yes Yes 100-400 ppb
Discharge into surface water is
between 100-400 ppb
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE Yes Grenades No Not Applicable
ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable Yes NO
ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT Not reported
ARDEC (PICATINNY ARSENAL) Yes Yes 627 ppb Sampled at the Open
detonation & propellant
manufacuturing/load facility -
GW averages approx. 170
ppm near the hogout facility
ARKANSAS ORD PLANT Not reported

ATLANTIC CITY AIRPORT Not reported
AVCO LYCOMING SF SITE Not reported
BANGORNSB Yes No Not Applicable
BARSTOW MCLB Not reported
BEDFORD NWIRP No Not Applicable
BLAINE NAVAL AMMUNITION Not reported
DEPOT
BRUNSWICK NAS Yes Yes
CAMP LEJEUNE MCB
CAMP PENDLETON MCB
Yes
Yes
No
No
Not Applicable
Not Applicable uo
CHERRY POINT MCAS
COLTS NECK NWS EARLE
No
Yes
Not Applicable No
No
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
-l:
~.~
CONCORDNWS No Not Applicable No Not Applicable

CORNHUSKER AAP Not reported
DAHLGREN NSWC Yes No Not Applicable
DO SAN JOAQUIN, SHARPE Not reported
FACILITY
DO SAN JOAQUIN, TRACY FACILITY Not reported
DOVER AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable No Not Applicable

DSC RICHMOND Not reported
EAU CLAIRE OP #1 Not reported
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE Yes Rocket propellant Yes 36,000 ppb
testing
EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE Yes Demolition & Burn No Not Applicable
Facility
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE ¥es EOD Range Yes NO
(munitions)
ElMENDORF AIR FORCE BASE Yes EOD Range No Not Applicable
(munitions), Grenades
FAIRCHILD AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable No Not Applicable

FORTDIX No /
FORT EUSTIS Yes No Not Applicable

FORT LEWIS Yes
FORT RICHARDSON No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
fORT RILEY No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
FORT WAINWRIGHT No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
FRANCIS E WARREN AIR FORCE Yes Mortars, cannons No Not Applicable
BASE
FTCROWDER No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE Yes Pyrotechnics, smoke No Not Applicable
grenades
HILL AIR FORCE BASE ,Yes Rocket motor testing Yes 70ppb
IL ORDNANCE PLT (CRAB Not reported

ORCHARD)
INDIAN HEAD NSWC Yes Yes 170ppb GW concentrations near the
hogout facility average approx.
.
IOWA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT
'
Information Not Available Yes (By EPA)
170 ppb
9ppb
JACKSONVILLE NAS Yes No Not Applicable
JET PROPULSION LAB Yes Yes
JOLIET AAP - KANKAKEE Information Not available
KEYPORT NUWC Yes No Not Applicable

KINGSBURY ORDNANCE PLANT Not reported
LAKE CITY AAP Yes Yes 73 ppb Monitoring well - 73 ppb; soil
15 ppb
LAKE LOUISE Not reported
LAKEHURST NAWCAD Not reported
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE Yes EODRange Yes ND
(munitions)
LARSON AIR FORCE BASE Not reported
LITTLE CREEK NAB Not reported
LONESTARMP Yes Yes 8.8 ppb Soil at production plant (8.8
ppb) and GW at burning
ground (8 ppb)
LONGHORNMP Yes Yes 169-247 ppm GW ranges from 4 to 64,500

(should be 4-64,500 ppb; soils range from 25 to
\ ppb?) 45,000 ppb
LOUISIANA MP Not reported

LUKE AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
MALTA TESTSTA Not reported
MANCHESTER ANNEX Not reported
MARATHON BAT PLT Not reported
MASSACHUSETTS MILITARY Yes Yes 300 ppb GW monitoring wells 17.7 ppb
RESERVATION (MMR) (May 2001) to 3.7 ppb (Jan
. 2003); offsite well detection at
1.75 ppb in May 2003
MCCHORD AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable No Not Applicable

MCGUIRE AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
MECHANICSBURG SPCC Not reported
MIDDLETOWN AIR DEPOT Not reported
MILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT Information Not Available
MORGANTOWN OW Not reported

MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE Yes EOD Range No Not Applicable
BASE (munitions)
NANSEMOND ORD DEPOT Not reported
NAV STATION TODD-TACOMA Not reported
NEBRASKA ORDNANCE PLANT No Not Applicable Yes 24 ppb
Army reports EPA has been
investigating this site because it
was a fireworks manufacturing
facility for approximately 20 years
subsequent to DoD use. There
has been no basis or historical
record to suspect DoD
perchlorate usage.
NEW HANOVER CNTY ARPT Not reported
NEW LONDON NSB Yes
NEWPORT NETC Not reported
NORFOLK COMNAVBASE Not reported
NORFOLKNSY Not reported
PANTEX ORDNANCE (DOE) Not reported
PANTEX ORDNANCE PLANT (TX Not reported
TECH)
PARRIS ISLAND MCRD Not reported
PATUXENT RIVER NAS Yes No Not Applicable
PEARL HARBOR FISC Not reported
PEARL HARBOR lNACTSHIPDET Not reported
PEARL HARBOR NS Yes No Not Applicable
PEARL HARBOR NSB No Not Applicable
PEARL HARBOR NSY No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
PEARL HARBOR PWC Not reported
PENSACOLA NAS Not reported
PORT HADLOCK NOC PAC DIV DET Not reported
PORTSMOUTH NSY No Not Applicable No Not Applicable

PUGET SOUND FISC BREMERTON No Not Applicable
PUGH SOUND NAVHOSP No Not Applicable

BREMERTON
PUGET SOUND NSY Not reported
QUANTICO MCB Not reported
REDSTONE ARSENAL Yes Yes 37-19.000 ppb 2 plumes with elevated
perchlorates; soil
contamination
RIVERBANK ARMY AMMO PLANT Information Not Available

ROBINS AIR FORCE BASE Yes Stored munitions No Not Applicable
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL Not reported
SAN BER ENGR DEPOT Not reported
SANGAMO ORDNANCE PLANT Not reported
SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER Not reported

ST JULIEN'S CREEK ANNEX Not reported
STROTHER FIELD Not reported
SUNFLOWER AAP Not reported
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE Yes Rocket motors, No Not Applicable
, . Cartridge actuated
devices. propellant
actuated devices
TOBYHANNA AD No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
TODD-SEATILE DRYDOCK INC Not reported
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
TUCSON INTERNATIONAL Not reported
AIRPORT
TWIN CITIES AAP Not reported
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
WAHIAWA NCTAMS EASTPAC Not reported
WASHINGTON NAVY YARD Not reported
WELDON SPRING ORO WORKS Not reported
WEST VIRGINIA ORD WORKS Not reported
WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS Not reported
WHITING FIELD NAS No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
WILLIAMSBURG FISC CHEATHAM No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
ANNEX
WILLOW GROVE AIR FORCE Yes Munitions No Not Applicable
RESERVE
WILLOW GROVE NAS Not reported
WRIGHT PATIERSON AIR FORCE Yes Rockets. munitions ,Yes ND
BASE
YORKTOWN NWS No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
YUMA MCAS 'Yes No . Not Applicable
SSL
DoD Perchlorate Survey
Service Site Summarfes • Environmental Restoration· Cleanup, Other
Regulatory
Interest (Clea~
Localion Number of Range of requested,
Source of Perchlorate (Operations, Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
Equipment, Activities) Detections Method
(Media) Collected Detected (ppb) requirements,
sampling
requirements)
Navy' Marine Corps Perchlorate Survey· Environmental Restoration· Cleanup, Other
I-' t-'
Research. Development. Test and None. Groundwater is unlikely to be
Navy' ALLEGANY BALLISTiCS
S~e 1: 1EW08 EvaluatIOn; Manulacturing; disposal 01 Groundwater 2 2 14.0 -76.2 EPA314 dveloped lor drinking water, and Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps LABORATORY
. waste product use is controlled by property owner
\
Research. Development. Tesl and None. Groundwater is unlikely to be
Navy' ALLEGANY BALLISTICS
Site 1: 1EW10 EvaluatlOfl; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 4 4 148.0- 3290 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and Federal; State DERP
waste product use is controlled by property owner
Research, Development, Tesl and None. Groundwater is unlikely to be

Site 1: 1EW12 EvaluatIOn; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 3 3 315.0 - 5,910.0 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and Federal; State DERP
waste product use is controlled by property owner.
Research, Development, Test and None. Groundwaler is unlikely to be

Navy! ALLEGANY BALLISTICS
Site 1: 1EW14 Evaluation; ManufactUring; disposal or Groundwater 4 4 626.0 - 7,930.0 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and Federal; Slate DERP
Research, Development, Test and None. Groundwater is unlikely to bE

Site 1: 1EW16 Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 7 7 3,500.0 - 34,900.0 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water. and Federal; State DERP
waste product use .is controlled by property owner.
Research, Development, Test and None. Groundwaler is unlikely to bE

Site 1: 1EW18 Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 4 4 34.2 - 72.0 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and Federal, State DERP

Site 1: 1EW21 Evatuation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 1 2 NO - 8.9' EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and Federal; State DERP
waste product' use is controlled by property owner.
Research, Development. Test and None. Groundwater is unlikely to bE

S~e 1: 1EW30 Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 4 4 190.0 -1,110.0 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and Federal, Slate DERP
Navy' ALLEGANY BALLISTICS '. Research, Development, Test and None. Groundwater is unlikely to bE
Site 1: 1EW31 Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 3 3 14.0 - 50.0 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and Federal; State DERP
Research. Development. Tesl and None. Groundwater is unlikely to bE

Navy' ALLEGANY BALLISTICS Site 1:
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 1 1 267 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water. and Federal, State DERP
Marine Corps LABORATORY 1Groundwater10
Research, Development. Test and None. Groundwater is unlikely to be

Navy' ALLEGANY BALLISTICS Site 1:
Evaluation; ManufactUring; disposal of Groundwater 6 6 7.5·55.0 EPA 314 dve!oped for drinking water, and Federal. State DERP
Marine Corps LABORATORY lGroundwater11
Fie: PercData_AIISvcs_May6_
500et Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other , Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 1 of 75
Service Site Summaries· EnVIronmental Restoration· Cleanup, Other
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Location Numburof Range of requested, .
Source of Perchlorala (Operations, Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s I of Exposure permitting Funding Type
Equipment, Activitlesl Detections Method
(Medial Co"ected Detected (ppb) requirements,
sampling
requirements)

Navy/ ALLEGANY BALLISTICS S~e 1.
Evaluation, Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 4 4 14.6 - 33.0 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and Federal; State DERP
waste product use is controlled by properly owner
Research, Development, Test and

Navy/ ALLEGANY BALLISTICS Sile 1: AS01
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Soil 1 1 68.0 EPA 314 None. Federal; Stale DERP
Marine Corps LABORATORY SB03
waste product .
Navy/. ALLEGANY BALLISTICS Site 1. AS01
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Soil 1 1 96.0 EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
waste product
Research. Development, Test and
Navy/ ALLEGANY BALLISTICS Site 1 AS01
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Soil 1 1 8800 EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
waste product
Navy/ ALLEGANY BALLISTICS Sile 1. AS01
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Soil 1 1 95.0 EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
waste product
Navy/ ALLEGANY BALLISTICS S~e l' AS01
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Soil 1 1 120.0 EPA 314 None Federal, State DERP
waste product
Navy/ ALLEGANY 8ALLISTICS S~e 1: AS01
Evaluation, Manufacturing; disposal of Soil 1 1 62.0 EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
waste product
Navy/ ALLEGANY BALLISTICS Site l' AS01
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Soil 2 2 220.0 - 2,500.0 EPA314 None Federal; State DERP
.waste product
Research. Development, Test and None Groundwater is unlikely to be

Navy/ ALLEGANY BALLISTICS S~e 12' AOCN
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwaler 1 1 160 EPA 314 dveloped lor drinking water, and Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps LABORATORY 31
Research, Development, Test and None. Groundwater is unlikely to be

Navy/ ALLEGANY BALLISTICS S~e 12: AOCN
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal 01 Groundwater 1 1 49.0 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and Federal; Stale DERP
Marine Corps LABORATORY 33
waste product use is controHed by property owner

Navy/ ALLEGANY BALLISTICS Sile 12. AS12
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 1 1 13.0 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps LABORATORY 12M~~
waste product use is controlted by properly owner.

Navy/ ALLEGANY BALLISTICS S~e2:
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 1 1 10.6 EPA 314 dvelopecl for drinking water, and Federal; State DERP
waste product use is controHed by properly owner
Navy/
CORONADO NAVBASE NASNIIR S~e 9 DemiliiarizatioIYDisposal Groundwater 0 5 ND EPA 314 None State DERP
Marine CorPS
Sampled wilh FY
Navy/ CRANE Navy Surface
Old Jeep Trail DemiliiarizatioIYDisposaf Soil 5 5 24.0 - 470.0 EPA 314 None Federal 2001 DERP
Marine Corps Water Center
funding
File: PercData_AIISvC5_May6_
Sheel: Em Resloralion-Cleanup, Other

• Method 314 reporting limil is 4 ppb Page 2 of 75
DoD Pen:"lorate Survey
ServIce Site Summan... Environmental R..toratlon • Cleanup. Other
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
location Number of Range of requested,
Source of Perchlorate (Operations. Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potentlat Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
Equipment, Activities) Detecttons Method
sampling
requirements)
Navy! CROWS LANDING S~e 11 Disposal

Demilitarization/Disposal Groundwater 0 11 NO EPA 314 None State BRAC
Marine Corps FLIGHT FACILITY Pits
CADHS
Cl04METH; Source: Production Wells Media
None identified. Basewide groundwater
Navy! Former Marine Corps Air EJ Toro Cl04METH; Exposure: Groundwater Human
consistent ~h off-station groundwater Groundwater 73 188 NO - 16.0· Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Station, EI Toro Basewide \ EPA 300.0; Receptor: Production Well
concentrations
EPA 314; Consumer
EPAM300.0
None identified. Basewide groundwater

Navy! Former Marine Corps Air EI Toro
consistent ~h off-station groundwater Soil 0 3 NO EPA 314 None Federal; Stale BRAC
Marine Corps Station, EI Toro Basewide
concentrations
Navy! Former Marine Corps Air

Anomaly Area 3 Perchlorate not detected at the s~e. Groundwater 0 25 NO EPA 314 None Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Slation, EI Toro
Source: Potential Production Well

Media of Exposure: Shallow
CADHS
Groundwater Human Receptor:
ClO4METH;
Navy! Former Marine Corps Air Potential Water Consumer. It is not
IRP S~e 2 Site is a landfll. Groundwater 118 217 NO - 20.7' Cl04METH; Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Station, EI Toro anticipated that groundwater w~hin
EPA 314;
the s~e boundary wil be used for
EPAM300.0
benefICial in the foreseeable Mure.
SoH contamination could potentially

leach into groundwater. Shallow
Cl04METH; Groundwater could be used for
Navy! Former Marine Corps Air
IRP S~e 1 Training, Dem~~arization/Disposal Soil 4 85 NO - 320.0· EPA 300.0; drinking water. It is not anticipated Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Station. EI Toro
EPA 314 that groundwater ~hin the s~e
boundary will be used for benefICial
use in the foreseeable Mure.
Source. Potential Production Well

,'
Media of Exposure: Shallow
CADHS
Groundwater
Cl04METH;
Human Receptor: Potential Water
Navy! Former Marine Corps Air ClO4METH;
IRPSite 1 Training; Demil~arization/Disposal Groundwater 52 106 NO - 398.0· Consumer. Federal; State BRAe
Marine Corps Station, EI Toro EPA 300.0;
It is not anticipated that
EPA 314;
groundwater within the sile
EPAM300.0
boundary will be used for benefICial
use in the foreseeable Mure.
Groundwater discharges to In-silu

EPA 314;
Navy! Indian Head Surface Mattawoman Creek Recreational bioremediation
Hog Out Demilitarization/Disposal Groundwaler 72 72 5.0 - 276,000.0 EPA 314 None
Marine Corps Warfare Center users of the creek could potentially fJ91d
(modified)
be exposed. demonstration
File: PercData_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other

• Method 314 repor1ing Iimil IS 4 ppb Page 3 of 75
SeIYlc:e Site Summaries· Environmental Relltoratlon • Cleanup, Other
Regulatory
Interest (Clearup
Location Number of Range of requested.
Service Faclllty Site Detected Samples ConcenlTations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy! Indian Head Surface Matlawoman

None Surface Water 0 34 NO EPA 314 None Federal OERP
Marine Corps Warfare Center Creek
Navy! Indian Head Surface

Nanjemoy Creek None Surface Water 0 2 NO EPA 314 None Federal DERP
Marine Corps Warlare Center
Navy! Indian Head Surface \

S~e 12 None Groundwater 0 7 NO EPA300 None Federal OERP
Marine Corps Warfare Center

S~e 28 None Sediment 0 10 NO EPA 314 None Federal OERP

S~e 28 None Soil 0 86 NO EPA 314 None Federal OERP

S~e 28 None Groundwater 0 22 NO EPA 314 None Federal DERP

S~e 28 None Surface Water 0 4 NO EPA 314 None Federal OERP

Srte 39 None Soi 0 47 NO EPA 314 None Federal DERP
Navy! Indian Head Surface IC!GP

Srte41 None Groundwater 0 4 NO None Federal OERP
Marine Corps Warfare Center Method
Navy! Indian Head Surface IC!GP

Srte44 None Groundwaler 0 1 NO None Federal OERP
Marine Corps Warfare Center Method

Site 45 None Sediment 0 5 NO EPA 314 None Federal OERP

S~e45 None Soil 0 11 NO EPA 314 None Federal OERP

Srte45 None Groundwater 0 5 NO EPA 314 None Federal OERP

Srte45 None Surface Water 0 3 NO EPA 314 None Federal OERP

S~e 47 None Sediment 0 2 NO EPA 314 None Federal OERP

S~e47 None Soi 0 10 NO EPA 314 None Federal OERP
Fie. PercOata_AlISvcs_May6_
Sheet. Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 4 of 75
000 Perchlorate Survey
Sentll* 6118 Summarl... Environmental Restoration- Cleanup, Other
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Equipment. Activities) Detections Method
sampling
requirements)
Navy! Indian Head Surface 300.0. EPA

Site 47 None Groundwater 0 16 NO None Federal OERP
Marine Corps Warfare Center 314

Site 47 None Surface Water 0 3 NO EPA 314 None Federal OERP
Navy! Indian Head Surface \

Site 53 None Sediment 0 16 NO EPA 314 None Federal OERP

Site 53 None Surface Water 0 2 NO EPA 314 None Federal OERP
EPA Surface
Potential exposure to recreational
Water-846
users of the Maltawoman Creek O&M or Defense
Navy! Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Bum Thermal Treatmen! Method
SATTP MW-{)1 SoH 2 2 921.0 - 11.600.0 tlvough soil contaminalion leaching State Working Capital
Marine Corps Warfare Center Interim Status 8321a(modifi
to groundwater, and groundwater Fund
ad) IC or
discharges to the creek.
LCIMS

O&M or Defense
Navy! Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment users of the Maltawornan Creek
SATTP MW-{)1 Groundwater 2 8 NO" - 35.4 EPA 314 State Working Capital
Marine Corps Warfare Center Interim Status tlvough groundwater discharges to
Fund
the creek.
EPA Surface
Potential exposure to recrealional
Water-846
users of the Maltawoman Creek O&M or Oefense
Navy! Indian Head Striace Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment Method
SATTPMW-{)2 SoH 2 2 776.0 - 4,710.0 tlvough soH contamination leaching State Wor1<ing Capital
Marine Corps Warfare Center interim status 8321a(modifi
to groundwater. and groundwater Fund
, ad) IC or
LCIMS

O&M or Defense
Navy! Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment users of the Maltawornan Creek
SATTP MW-02 Groundwater 1 7 NO" - 25.1 EPA 314 State Working Capital
Marine Corps Warfare Center inlerim status tlvough groundwater discharges to
Fund
the creek.
EPA Surface
Water-846
users of the Mallawoman Creek O&M or Defense
Navy! Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment Method
SATTPMW-{)3 SoH 3 3 2580 - 6230 tlvough soil contamination leaching State Working Capital
ad) IC or
LCiMS

O&M or Oelense
Navy! Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatmen! users of Maltawoman Creek
SATTPMW-{)3 Groundwater 8 9 NO" - 4630 EPA 314 Stale Working Capital
Marine Corps Warfare Center interim status tlvaugh groundwater discharges to
Fund
the creek.
FHe: PercOata_AIISvcs_MayB_
Sheet: Em Restoration-Cleanup, Other

" Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 5 of 75
DoD Perchlorate SUrvey
Service Site Summaries· Envtronrnent3i R..toraIIofl • Cleanup, Other
Regulatory
Interest (Clearvp
Location Number of Range of requested,
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(sl of Exposure permitting Funding Type
Equipment, Actlvlllesl Detections Method
(Medial Collected Detected (ppbl requirements,
sampling
requirements)
EPA Surface
Water-846
users of the Maltawoman Creek O&M or DefenSe
Navy I Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment 30,400.0 - 54,400.0 Method
SATTP MW-04 Soo 3 3 through soU contamination leaching State Working Cap~al
Marine Corps Warfare Center interim status 8321a(modili
ed) IC or
LC/MS

O&M or Defense
Navy I Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment users of the Maltawoman Creek
SATTPMW-04 Groundwater 1 7 NO' -763.0 EPA 314 State Working Capital
Marine Corps Warfare Center interim status , t!vough groundwater discharges to
Fund
the creek.
EPA Surface
Waler-846
Navy I Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment 27,500.0 - 40,000.0 Method
SATTP MW-05 Soi 2 2 through soo contamination leaching State Working Cap~a1
Marine Corps Warfare Center interim status 8321a(modili
ed) IC or
to groundwater. and groundwater Fund
LC/MS

Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment O&M or Defense
Navy I Indian Head Surface Users of the Maltawoman Creek
SATTPMW-05 Groundwater 3 8 NO' 179.0 EPA 314 Slale Working Capital
Marine Corps Warfare Center interim status lIvough groundwater discharges 10
.Fund
the creek.
EPA Surface
Water-846
USers of the Maltawoman Creek O&M or Defense
Navy I Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment Method
SATTPMW-06 Soil 2 2 58.2 - 98.2 through soU contamination leaching State Working Cap~al
.
interim status 8321a(modifi
ed) IC or
LC/MS
to 9roundwater, and groundwater
Fund
O&M or Defense
Navy I Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment
SATTP MW-06 Groundwater 0 7 NO EPA314 None State Working Cap~al
Marine Corps Warfare Center interim status
Fund
, '
EPA Surface
Water-846
Navy I Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment Method
SATTPMW-07 Soil 1 2 NO -79.6 through soU contamination leaching State Working Caprtal
Marine Corps Warfare Center interim status 8321 a(modifi
ad) IC or
discharges 10 the creek.
LC/MS
O&M or Defense
Navy I Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment
SATTP MW-07 Groundwater 0 8 NO EPA 314 None State Working Caprtal
Fund
Fie. PercOata_AlISvcs_Mayll_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Clearvp, Olher , Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 6 of 75
000 Perchlorate SUrvey "

"
Servlc:e Site SUmmaries· Environmental ft..toratlc»n .ClfNmup, Qtb.r
Regulatory
Interest (Cleaoop
Service Facility Site Datected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
EPA Surface
Water-846
Navy! Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Trealment Method
SATTP MW.{)8 SOO 1 2 ND - 62.0 through so~ contamination leaching Slate Working Capttal
ed) IC or
lClMS
Navy! Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment O&M or Defense
SATTPMW.{)8 Groundwater 0 8 ND EPA 314 None State Working Capttal
Fund
EPA Surface
Water-846
Method
SATTPMW.{)9 Soi 0 2 ND None State Working Capttal
ed) ICor Fund
LCIMS
SATTPMW.{)9 Groundwater 0 7 ND EPA 314 None State Working Capttal
Fund
EPA Surface
Water-846
users Of the Maltawoman Creek O&M or Defense
Navy! Indian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment Method
SATTPMW-l0 Soil 3 3 243.0 - 645.0 through soil contamination leaching State Working Capttal
10 groundwater, and groundwater Fund
ed) IC or
LCIMS
SATTPMW-l0 Groundwater 0 7 ND EPA 314 None State Working Capttal
Fund
Navy! Indian Head Surface O&M or Defense

Potable Well ",5 There is None. Drinking Water 0 1 ND EPA300M None None Working Cap~al
Marine Corps Warfare Center . '
Fund
Navy! Indian Head Surface PolableWell O&M or Defense

There is None. Drinking Water 0 1 ND EPA300M None None Working Capttal
Marine Corps Warfare Center ",6a
Fund
Navy! Indian Head Surface PolableWell O&M or Defense

There is None. Drinking Water 0 1 NO EPA300M None None Working Capital
Marine Corps Warfare Center #2012
Fund

Stte 11 Unknown Other 2 2 ND EPA 314 None Federal OERP
File: PercOata_AlISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Oeaoop, Other • Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 7 of 75
seMce S~ Sumll1ll"es • ErWlronmental Restoration· ~UP. Other ."
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
location Number of
Range of requested, ,
Source of Perchlorate (Operations, Number of
Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples
Concentrations
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure ~ilting Funding Type
Equipment, Activities) Detections
Method
(Media) Collected
Detected (Ppbl
requirements,
sampling
requirements)
Potential exposure to Soil for

construction workers. maintenance
Navy I Indian Head Surface
Site 11 Unknown Sediment 7 8 NO' -230.0 EPA 314 workers or trespassers. Potential Federal DERP
exposure to surfac~ water and
sediment for recreational users.
Groundwater recharges into surface

Navy I Indian Head Surface water. Potential exposure to surface
SHe 11 Unknown Groundwater 11 15 NO'-4.0 EPA 314 Federal DERP
Marine Corps Warf!"re Center waler and sediment for recreational
users.
Potential exposure to SoH for

construction workers. maintenance
Site 11 Unknown Surface Water 7 11 NO'-4.0 EPA 314 workers or trespassers. Potential Federal OERP
exposure to surface waler and
sediment for recreational users.
Potential exposure to SoH for

SHe 11 Unknown Soil 45 66 NO' - 480,000.0 EPA 314 construction workers, maintenance Federal DERP
workers or trespassers.
Potential exposure to surface water

SHe 17 Unknown Surface Water 7 7 4.0 EPA 314 and sediment for recreational Federal OERP
users.
Potential exposure to surface water
SHe 17 Unknown Sediment 6 6 86.0 - 160.0 . EPA 314 and sediment for recreational Federal OERP
users.
Potential exposure to Soil for

SHe 17 Unknown SoH 24 35 NO' -1300 EPA 314 construction workers. maintenance Federal OERP
workers or trespassers.

SHe 17 Unknown Groundwater 0 8 NO EPA 314 None Federal OERP
loolViduals (construction worker)

lhat come in contact with
Site 21 Unknown SoH 23 30 NO' -130.0 EPA 314 subsurface Soil or groundwater at Federal OERP
this sHe could potentially be
exposed.
Individuals (construction worker)
that come in contact wHh
SHe21 Unknown Groundwater 20 23 NO' - 2,900.0 EPA 314 subsurface SoH or groundwater at Federal OERP
this site could potentially be
exposed.
FHe. PercData_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet· Env Restoration-Clearop, Other , Method 314 reporling JimH is 4 ppb Page 8 of 75
DoO Pen:hlOfllte Survey
8ervk:e S~ Summar1... EnYlronmentaJ R..tonItI Clean . , Other
. Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Service Facility Site . Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway{sl of Exposure permitting Funding Type
(Medial Collected Detected (ppb) requirements,
sampling
requirements)
The groundwater discharges to a

EPA314;
stream south of the s~e. Potential
Navy I Indian Head Surface EPA300;
S~e42 Unknown Groundwater 9 15 NO' - 4.0 exposures by trespassers and Federal OERP
Marine Corps Warfare Genter IGlGP
maintenance persomel digging at
Method
the s~e.
The groundwater discharges to a
Navy I Indian Head Surface , stream south of the s~e. Potential

S~e42 Unknown Soil 10 12 NO' - 882 EPA 314 exposures by trespassers and Federal OERP
Marine Corps Warfare Genter
maintenance personnel digging at
the s~e.
Potential exposures by recreational

Navy I Indian Head Surface ICIGP-
S~e57 Unknown Groundwater 1 6 NO-8.8 users from groundwater discharges Federa: OERP
Marine Corps Warfare Genter Method
to the Mallawoman Creek.
BRI Machen
Source Water,
O&M or Defense
Navy I Marine Corps Air Station, Source water to drinking water
Chocolate Colorado River Background Levels Drinking Water 1 1 4.2 EPA 314 None Working Ca~aI
Marine Corps Yuma system.
Mountains Fund
Range
Cannon Air
Defense O&M or Defense
Navy I Marine Corps Air StatIOn,
Complex Water No perchlorate was found Drinking Water 0 1 NO EPA 314 None None Working Capital
Marine Corps Yuma
System Source Fund
Water
To Conform W~h
The 29
5eptember 2003
Barry M. O&M or Defense
Navy I Marine Corps Air Station, Department Of
Goldwater, Pistol Operational Testing Groundwater 0 2 NO EPA 314 None Working Capilal
Marine Corps Yuma Defense tntermin
Range Fund
Policy On
Perchlorate
Sampling
To Conform W~h
. '
The 29
September 2003
Barry M O&M or Defense
Navy I Marine Corps Air Station, Department Of
Goldwater, Operational Testing Groundwater 0 1 NO EPA 314 None Working Cap~al
Marine Corps Yuma Defense Intermin
Tracker Building Fund
Policy On
Perchlorate
Sampling
FHe: PercData_AnSvcs_May6_

, Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 9 of 75
DoD Perch10rate Survey
Servtce Site Summaries· Environmental RestoraUon • Cleanup.,- 0ttIw
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
location
Number of Range of requested,
Source ot Perchlorate (Operations. Numberot Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected
Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
(Medial
Collected Detected (ppb) requirements,
sampling
requirements)
To Conform W~h
The 29
Camp Burt 2, September 2003
Navy! Manne Corps Air Station, Eastern 0&1.4 or Defense
Soil 7 Department Of
Operational Testing 0 NO EPA 314 None Working Cap~a1
Marine Corps Yuma Chocolate Defense Intermin
Montains Fund
Policy On
\ Perchlorate
Sampling
To Conform W~h
The 29
Due to the highly solubil~y of September 2003
Navy! Marine Corps Air Station, Beckett House, Supplied from Colorado River which has a 0&1.4 or Defense
EPA 314 perchlorate, the most like route of Department Of
Groundwater 2 2 3.3 - 3.5' Working Ca~al
Marine Corps Yuma Up-Gradiant background level of 4-5 ppb. ' <MRl roman exposure is tlYough Defense Intermin
Fund
consumtion of Groundwater. Policy On
Perchlorate
Sampling
MCASMain The sample tested was the source 0&1.4 or Defense

Navy! Marine Corps Air Station, Supplied from Colorado River which has a
Waler System Surface Water 1 1 4.6 EPA 314 water supply to the Water None Working Cap~al
Marine Corps Yuma Background level 014-5 ppb.
Source Water Treatment Plant. Fund
To Conform W~h
The 29
Due to the high solubil~y of September 2003
Barry M. O&M or Defense
Navy! Marine Corps Air Station, perchlorate, the most likely route of Department Of
Goldwater Training Soil 1 2 NO' - 34.6 EPA 314 Working Cap~al
Marine Corps Yuma human exposure is tlYough Defense Intermin
Aux~lary II Fund
consumtion of Groundwater Policy On
Perchlorate
Sampling
To Conform W~h
CampB~1
The 29
Machen, September 2003
Navy! Marine Corps Air Station, 0&1.4 or Defense
Soil Department Of
WestllffJ Training 0 6 NO EPA 314 None Working Cap~a1
Marine Corps Yuma Defense Intermin
Chocolate Fund
Policy On
Mountains
Perchlorate
Sampling
To Conform W~h
The 29
Camp Burt 1, September 2003
Navy! Marine Corps Air Station. Eastern 0&1.4 or Defense
Training Soil Department Of
0 9 NO EPA 314 None Working Capital
Mountains Fund
Policy On
Perchlorate
Sampling
Fie PercData_AJISvcs_ May6_
Sheet· Env Restoratior>-Cleanup. Other , Method 314 repor1ing lim~ is 4 ppb Page 10 of 75
DoD Pel'C!1lorate Survey

- - ---':": - ~ -~-
------- ---- ---~-.-._-----
----:;:-_.,....-:-~ -~-,--:
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Location Number of Range 01 requested,
Source of Perchlorate (Operations, Numberot Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations PotentiaIPathway(s) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
Equipment. ActivitIes) Detections Method
sampling
requirements)
To Conform With
The 29
Camp David. September 2003
Navy! Marine Corps Air Station, Western O&M or Delense
Training 7 Department 01
Soil 0 ND EPA 314 None Working Cap~al
Mountains Fund
Policy On
\ Perchlorate
Sampling
To Conform W~h
The 29
Iris Wash, September 2003
Navy! Marine Corps Air Station, Western O&M or Defense
Department Of
Training So~ 0 2 ND EPA 314 None Working Capital
Marine Corps Yuma Chocolate Defense lntermin
Mountains Fund
Policy On
Perchlorate
Sampling
To Conform W~h
The 29
Due to the high solubif~ of September 2003
NavyI Marine Corps Air Station, Yodav~le, Barry O&M or Defense
Training perchlorate, the most likely route of Department Of
So~ 1 10 ND' - 93.9 EPA 314 Working capital
Marine Corps Yuma M. Goldwater human exposure is through Defense Intermin
Fund
consumption of Groundwater. Policy On
Perchlorate
Sampling
Marine Training
Range Shothole Due to the high solubil~ of
Navy! Marine Corps Air Station, Located On The O&M or Defense
perchlorate, the most likely route of
Trairnng; Dem~~arizationiDisposal Soil 1 1 150.0 EPA 314 None Working Capital
Marine Corps Yuma Barry M human exposure is through
Goldwater Fund
consumption of Groundwater.
Range
Navy!
..
WestGate
Methods
3OO.0amnd
350.2;
NAS South Weymouth Source is unknown. Groundwater 0 10 ND None Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Landffil Methods
300.0 and
350.2
Detections located at Nomans Land
Island which is located about 3
m~ south west of Martha's
Navy! Nomans Land Vineyard. Nomans Island is an
NAS South Weymouth Training Sediment 2 2 240.0 - 1,935.0 EPA 314 State BRAC
Marine Corps Island uninha~ated island used as a
wildlife refuge and perchlorate does
no! present a threat to human
heatlh.
File: PercData_AJISvcs_MayS_
Sheet Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other , Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 11 of 75
DoD PerchloratJ $urvey

8ervtce Site 81 rtea • Environmental Reatorati, el, .. Other- ; ,.
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
(Media) Collected Detected (ppb) requirements.
sampling
requirements)
None. Groundwater is not used for

China Lake IRP human consumption. Sfte is
Navy! NAVAIRWPNSTA CHINA Operational Testing; Training, EPA 314
#15 Range Groundwater 1 1 15.0 separated from drinking water Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps LAKE CA DemijitarizatiorJDisposal (modified)
Leach Field source wells by mies and thick clay
aquitard.
China Lake IRP Research, Development, Test and human consumption. Site is
Navy! NAVAIRWPNSTA CHINA \ EPA 314
#46 Dunkft Evaluation; MaintenanceiReconfoguration; Groundwater 2 2 58.1 - 421.0 separated from drinking water Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps LAKECA (modified)
Drainage Dftch Demitftarizati<n'Oisposal source wells by miles and thick clay
aquftard.
China Lake IRP
human consumption. Sfte is
Navy! NAVAIRWPNSTA CHINA #7 Michelson Research, Development, Test and EPA 314 Federal; State;
Groundwater 4 4 19.0 - 7200 separated from drinking water DERP
Marine Corps LAKE CA Lab Drainage Evaluation; Manufacturing (modified) Locat
source wells by miles and thick. clay
Dftch
aquftard.
China Lake IRP

Research. Development. Test and roman consumption. Sfte is
Navy! NAVAIRWPNSTA CHINA #8 Surface EPA 314
Evaluation; Manufacturing; Groundwater 3 3 246 - 3440 separated from drinking water Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps LAKE CA WaterPL (modified)
Demilitarization/Disposal source wells by miles and thick clay
Drainage Dftches
aquftard.
human consumption. Site is

Navy! NAVAIRWPNSTA CHINA China Lake IRP EPA 314
Suspect that ft is naturally occurring Groundwater 2 2 34.8 - 50.0 separated from drinking water Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps LAKE CA #43 Minideck (modified)
source wells by miles and thick clay
aquftard.
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial

bylC
Navy!
Marine Corps
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area T
Texas
.
Delivery Station Surface Water 3 7 ND-11.0 method,
based on
Area T Industrial site; Groundwater
to Surface Water pathway
State DERP
CALDHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate

Navy! bylC Area T Industriat sfte; Groundwater
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area T ' Delivery Station Groundwater 60 64 NO' -1400 Stale DERP
Marine Corps method. to Surface Water pathway
Texas
based on
CALDHS
1997
STL
Perchlorate
Area T Industrial site; So~
Naval Weapons Industrial bylC
Navy! contamination leaches to
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area T Delivery Station Soil 2 32 NO - 2,300.0 method, Siale DERP
Marine Corps groundwater which leads to Surface
Texas based on
Water pathway
CALDHS
1997
File. PercData_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other , Method 314 reporting ~mft is 4 ppb Page 12 of 75
DoD PWdtlorate Survey

•... -
~.'.
Regulatory
Intere.t (Cleanup
Source of Perchlorate (Operetlona, Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Sample. Concentretlons Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting Funding Trpe
Equipment, Activities) Detection. Method
sampling
requirements)
STL
Perchlorate
Navy! Area T Industrial site; Groundwater
Reserve Plant. McGregor AreaT Delivery Station Sediment 0 2 NO method. State OERP
Marine Corps to Surface Water pathway
Texas based on
CALOHS
1997
EPA 314;
STl
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Area A Landf~l; Groundwater to
Navy I bylC
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area A Landfill DemffitarizationlOisposal Groundwater 10 12 NO' - 110.0 Surface water; Stale OERP
Marine Corps method.
Texas CommericaVlndustrial worker
based on
CAlOHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Area 0 Landfill; Groundwater to
Navy! bylC
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area 0 Landf~1 Dem~itarization10isposal Groundwater 21 24 NO' - 240.0 Surface Water; State DERP
Marine Corps method,
based on
CAlOHS
1997
STL
Perchlorate
Area 0 Landfdl; Potential for soil to
Navy! leach to groundwater. Groundwater
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area 0 Landfill Oemditarizalion/Oisposal Sod 0 6 NO method. State OERP
Marine corps to surface water exposure pathway;
Texas based on
Commericalllndustrial worker
CALOHS
,
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Area E landfill; Groundwater to
Navy! bylC
Reserve Plant. McGregor Area E Landfill Demilitarization/Disposal Groundwater 8 18 NO' - 90.0 Surface Water; Stale OERP
Texas Commerical/lndustrial worker
based on
CALOHS
1997
STL
Perchlorate Area E landfl1l; Potential for soil to
Naval Weapons Industrial bylC leach to groundwater Groundwater
Navy!
Reserve Plant. McGregor Area E Landfill Oemditarization/Oisposal Soil 0 5 NO method, to Surface Water exposure State OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on pathway; CommericaVlndustrial
CALOHS worker
1997
Fda: PercOata_AllSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 13 of 75
" . DoD Pen;hlorale SU,MlY . .

8eMce Sit. s~es • Environmental RestOratton· CltanliP. Other c c,
Regulatory
Interest (Oeanup
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potentiat Pathway(s) of Exposure permilling . Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Area 0 landfoR; Groundwater to
Nayy! bylC
Reserve Plant, McGregor AreaP Dem~ttarizatiorv'Disposal Surface Water 22 48 NO' - 42,0 Surface Water pathway; Stale OERP
Texas CommericaUlndustrial worker
based on
CALOHS
\
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Nav31 Weapons Industrial Area 0 Landfdl; Groundwater to
Nayy! bylC
Reserve Plant. McGregor Area P Oem~ttarizationlDisposal Groundwater 74 110 NO' 98.0 Surface Water paltMlay; State OERP
Texas Commericallindustrial worker
based on
CAL OHS
1997
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial bylC Area 0 Landfdl; Groundwater to
Navy!
Reserve Plant. McGregor Area P Demilttarization/Oisposal Sediment 0 2 NO method, Surface Water pathway; State OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on Commericallindustrial worker
CALOHS
1997
STL
Perchlorate Area 0 Landfdl; Potential for so~
Nayal Weapons Industrial by IC contamination to leach into
Navy!
Reserve Plant. McGregor Area P Oem~ttarjzationiOisposal SOO 0 6 NO method, groundwater. Groundwater to Slate OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on Surface Water exposure pathway;
CALOHS Commericallindustrial worker
1997
EPA 314;
STL Area Z Industrial Area; Potential for
Perchlorate soo conIamination to leach into
Navy! bylC groundwater. Groundwater which
Reserve Plant. McGregor AreaZ Dem~ttarization/Oisposal Groundwater 33 43 NO' • 91.000.0 State OERP
Marine Corps method, leads to Surface Water exposure
Texas
, . based on pathway; Commericallindustrial
CALOHS worker
1997
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial bytC
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor AreaZ Demilitarization/Disposal So~ 0 6 NO method, None State OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on
CALOHS
1997
F~e: PercOata_AUSYcs_May6_
Sheet: Eny Restoration-Cleanup, Other , Method 314 reporting limtt is 4 ppb Page 14 of 75
DoD Pen:hlorat8 su~y
ServIce SIte Summartes - EnYlronlMntaJ R8$tOratlon • Cleanup, 0ttIer
Regulatory
Interest {CIea.-..p
Location Humber of Range of requested.
Source of Perchlorate (Operations, Humber of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Sample. Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permilling Funding Type
(Media) Collected Detected (ppb) req.wements.
sampling
requirements)
EPA 314.
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Area F Industrial Area;
Navy! bylC
Reserve Plant. McGregor Area F MainlenanceiReconftguration Surface Water 84 125 NO' - 1.600.0 Groundwater to Surface Water; State DERP
based on
CALDHS
\
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Area F Industrial Area;
Navy! bylC
Reserve Plant..McGregor AreaF MaintenanceiReconf'9uration Groundwater 366 458 NO' - 17,000.0 Groundwater to Surface Water; State DERP
based on
CAlDHS
1997
EPA 314;
STl
Area F Industrial Area; Potential for
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial soil contamination to leach into
Navy! bylC
Reserve Plant. McGregor AreaF MaintenanceiReconfigural,on Son 41 184 NO' - 98.000.0 groundwater. Groundwater to State DERP
Texas Surface Water exposure pathway;
based on
Commericalllndustrial worker
CAlDHS
1997
STL
Perctmrate
Navy!
Reserve Plant. McGregor Area F Maintenance!Reconfiguralion Sediment 0 2 NO me1hod. None State DERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on
, CAlDHS
1997
STl
Perchlorate Area M tndustrial Sne; Potential for
Naval Weapons Industrial bytC soil contamination 10 leach to
Navy!
Reserve Plant. McGregor AreaM Ma'nlenance!Reconfiguration; Storage Soil 153 328 NO - 1.800.000.0 method. groundwater. Groundwater to State DERP
Marine Corps
Texas ,' based on Surface Water exposure pathway;
CAlDHS CommericaVlndustrial Worker
1997
STl
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial bylC Area M Industrial Sne. Groundwaler
Navy!
Reserve Plant. McGregor Area M MaintenanceiReconfiguration; Storage Sediment 1 9 NO - 310.0 me1hod, to Surface Water pathway; State DERP
Marine Corps
Texas based On CommericaVlndustrial Worker
CAlDHS
1997
File: PercData...,AIISvcs_MayB_
Sheet: Em Restoration-Clea.-..p. Other , Method 314 reporting limil is 4 ppb Page 15 of 75
DoD Perthlorate Survey ".,',
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
location Number of Range of requesled.
Service Facility Slle Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
(Media) Collected Detected lppb) requirements.
sampling
requirements)
STl
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial bylC Area M Industrial S~e; Groundwater
Navy!
Reserve Plant. McGregor Area M MaintenanceiReconfiguration; Storage Surface Water 267 344 NO - 5.300.0 method. 10 Surface Water pathway; Stale OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on Commericallindustrial Worker
CAlDHS
1997
EPA 314;
STl
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Area M Induslrial Stte; Groundwater
Navy! bylC
Reserve Plant. McGregor AreaM MaintenancelReconf'9uration; Storage Groundwater 354 445 NO' - 85.000.0 to Surface Waler pathway; Slate OERP
Texas Commericallindustrial Worker
based on
CAL OHS
1997
STl
Perchlorate Area B Industrial Area; Potential for
Naval Weapons Industrial bylC soil to leach to grOUndwater.
Navy!
Reserve Plant. McGregor AreaB Manufacturing Soil 1 2 NO - 35.0 method, Groundwater 10 Surface Water Stale OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on exposure pathway;
CAlOHS Commericallindustrial worker
1997
STl
Perchlorate
Navy!
Reserve Plant. McGregor Area B Manufacturing Groundwater 0 2 NO method. None State OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on
CAlOHS
1997
STl
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial bytC Area llndustrial stte; Groundwater
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGre90r Area l Operational Testing Groundwater 10 33 NO - 160.0 method, to Surface Water; State DERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on Commericalllndustrial wor1<er
CAlOHS
1997
STl
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial by IC
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area l Operational Testing Soil 0 29 NO method, None State OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on
CAlOHS
1997
Fie: PercOata_AIISvcs_May6_
S'-l: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other , Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 16 of 75
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
sampling
requirements)
STL
Perc~ate
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area L Operational Testing Surface Water 0 4 NO method, None Stale OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on
CALOHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Peretlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Area R Industrial sUe; Groundwater
Navy! bylC
Reserve Plant, McGregor AreaR Operational Testing Groundwater 27 41 NO-ll0.0 to SUrface Water pathway; State OERP
Texas Commericallindustrial Worker
based on
CALOHS
1997
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial bylC Area R Industrial sUe; Groundwater
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor AreaR Operational Testing Surface Water 4 7 NO - 23.0 method, to Surface Waler pathway; State DERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on Commerical!lndustrial Worker
CALOHS
1997
STL
Perc~ale Area R Industrial sUe; Potential for
Naval Weapons Industrial bylC soil to leach to groundwater.
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area R Operational Testing So~ 1 21 NO-59.0 method, Groundwater to Surface Water State OERP
Marine Corps
CALOHS CommericaVlndustrial Worker
1997
STL
Perchlorate
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area R Operational Testing Sediment 0 2 NO method, None State OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on
CALDHS
1997
STL
Perchlorate Various manufacturing areas onsUe;
Naval Weapons Industrial bylC Potential lor so~ to leach into
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor OZOlfsUe Operational Tesling SOU 1 33 NO- 370.0 method, groundwater. Groundwater to Stale OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on Surface Waterexposure pathway;
CALOHS Residentual
1997
File. PercDala_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-ClearlJp, Other • Method 314 reporting limU is 4 ppb Page 17 0175
DoD Perchlorate 8'

0 ,.,
...... ~ Vt'~ -..... H~,..'.VfIII' ""1!~"~"n~'~ .... n_~,~~'~ - VI~~~, """'~~~ ' ... , ; ::' ;" '
Regulatory
InteFest (Cleanup
Source of Perchlorate (Operations.
Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permilling Funding Type

sampling
requirements)
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Various manufacturing areas onsne;
Navy! bylC
Reserve Plant, McGregor OZOffsite Operational Testing Surface Water 4 21 ND' - 3700 Groundwater to Surface Waler; State DERP
Texas Residentuat
based on
CALDHS
\
1997
EPA 314,
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Various manufacturing areas onsite;
Navy! bylC
Reserve Plant, McGregor OZOffsne Operational Testing Groundwater 389 804 ND - 56,000,0 Groundwater to Surface Water; State DERP
Texas ResidentuaJ
based on
CALDHS
1997
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial bylC Various manufacturing areas onsne;
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor OZ Offsne Operational Testing Sediment 2 19 ND -720,0 method, Groundwater to Surface Water; State DERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on Residentual
CALDHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Operational Testing;
Navy! Bell Co. Intake bylC Drinking water supply plant;
Reserve Plant, McGregor MaintenanceiReconfiguration; Storage; Surface Water 1 45 ND'-4.1 Stale DERP
Marine Corps (Off Post) method, residential user
Texas Demilitarization/Disposal
based on
CALDHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
NavaJ Weapons Industrial Operational Testing;
Navy! Bluebonnet bylC
Reserve Plant, McGregor MaintenanceiReconfiguration; Storage; Surface Waler 0 44 ND None State DERP
Marine Corps Intake, (Off Post) method,
based on
CALDHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Navy! Gatesville Intake bylC
Reserve Plant, McGregor MaintenanceiReconflQuration; Storage; Surface Water 0 46 ND None State DERP
Marine Corps (Off Post) method,
based on
CALDHS
1997
Fie: PercDala_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Resloralion-Cleaoop, Other , Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 18 of 75

r <,.,« ,-';, '~~~~IJIIIIiIIl_-I:JIYlJVI1f11'1ft11i11 ~~<.. "'l~Up. ~ .<,' "':<~; ?<. '
i\ i'" "
Regulatory
Interest (Cleaoop
service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permMing FUnding Type
(Media) Collected Oatected (ppb) requirements.
sampling
requirements)
EPA 314;
STL
Perctlorate

Navy! Harris Creek (Off bylC Groundwater to Surface water;
Reserve Plant, McGregor MaintenancelReconfoguration; Storage; Surface Water 21 62 NO' -17.0 State OERP
Marine Corps Post) method, surface water; agricullural;
Texas . DemilwizatioolDisposal
based on
CALOHS
\
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perc~orate
Naval Weapons Industrial Operational Testing; Orink water and recreational
Navy! Lake Belton (Off bylC
Reserve Plant. McGregor . MaintenancelReconfiguration; Storage; Surface Water 190 790 NO' - 210.0 reservoir; residential and State OERP
Marine Corps Post) method,
Texas Demil~arizationiDisposal agricultural receptors
based on
CALDHS
1997
STL
Per~orate
Naval Weapons Induslrial Operalional Testing; by IC Drink water and recreational
Navy! Lake Bellon (Off
Reserve Plant, McGregor MaintenancelReconfoguration; Storage; Sediment 39 153 NO - 5400 method, reservoir; residential and State OERP
Marine Corps Post)
Texas OemmtarizationiDisposal based on agricultural receptors
CAL DHS
1997
STL
Perctlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Operational Testing; bylC
Navy! Lake Waco (Off Orinking water and recreational
Reserve Plant. McGregor MaintenanceiReconfoguration; Storage; Surface Waler 1 291 ND-17.4 method, State OERP
Marine Corps Post) reservoir; residential receptors
Texas Demil~arizationiOisposal based on
CALDHS
,
1997
STL
Perctlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial. Operalional Testing; bytC
Navy! Lake Waco (Off
Reserve Plant. McGregor MaintenanceiReconfiguration; Storage; Sediment 0 69 NO method, None State DERP
Marine Corps Post)
Texas Demil~arizationiDisposal based on
,' CALOHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Operational Testing; River that supplies Lake Belton ~s
Navy! Leon River (Off bylC
Reserve Plant, McGregor MaintenancelReconliguration; Storage; Surface Waler 14 124 NO' - 270 water; residential and agricultural State DERP
Marine Corps Post) method,
Texas Demil~arizationIDisposal receptors
based on
CALOHS
1997
F~e: PercOata_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-CleallJp, Other , Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 19 of 75
Dol) Pefc;hlorate Survey " ,; ," ,

·' Servtce' SI-. Summir1e8~ E~vlrOn",'Jt ..toratlon. ~UP.'Qthei'>,;
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Source of P.rchlorate (Operations, Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposurelpermilting . FUnding Type
Equipment, ntlvitles) Detections Method
sampling
requirements)
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Navy I lNavat Weapons Industrial l South Bosque Rlo~ational Testing; . bylC
Groundwater to surface water;
M ' Cor Reserve Plant, McGregor (Off P t) MalntenancelReconflguratlOO; Storage; Surface Waler 39 129 NO' -13,0 agricultural and residential State OERP
anne ps Texas os ' Oem~ilarizatiorVOisposal method,
receptors
based on
CALDHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons InduslJial [Station Creek Operational Testing;
by IC Groundwater to Surface water; IState
Navy I IReserve Plant, McGregor (Off Post) MaintenanceiReconflguration; Storage; Surface Water 58 85 NO' - 6,600.0 DERP
Marine Corps Texas method, surface water; agricullural receptor
Oem~ilarizatiorVDisposal
based on
CALOHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Navy I lNaval Weapons Industrial ITemPles Intake loperationai Testing; . bylC
Marine Corps Reserve Plant, McGregor (Off Post) MalntenanceIReconflgUratlOn; Storage; Surface Water o 44 NO
method.
None State DERP
Texas Oem"ilanzatlOrVOlsposal
based on
CALOHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Navy I INaval Weapons Industrial Wacos Intake Operational Testing;
bylC
Marine Corps Reserve Plant, McGregor (Off Post) MaintenanceiReconf!guration; Storage; Surface Water o 44 NO
method.
None State OERP
Texas Demililarizatio(l!Dlsposal
based on
CALDHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
N I [Naval Weapons Industrial IW~dfl loperationai Testing; bylC Surface water; irrigation; residential tSlate
Mavy C Reserve Plant, McGregor Int k ~sp, t) MaintenancelReconf'9uration; Storage; Surface Waler 2 45 NO'-6.0 OERP
anne orps Texas ae os Dem~ilarizatiorVOisposal method, receptors
based on
CALDHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate Area 0 Industrial Area;
Navy I [NaVal Weapons Industrial bylC Groundwater to surface water
Marine Corps Reserve Plant, McGregor IArea 0 Storage Groundwater 62 88 NO' -160.0 State OERP
method, pathway; Commerical/lnduslJial
Texas
based on Worker
CALOHS
1997
File: PercOata_AlISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limil is 4 ppb Page 20 of 75
DoD Percbl0rat8 Survey

..
. ,
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Equipment, Actlvltlesl Detections Method
sampling
requirements)
STL
Perctdorate Area 0 Industrial Area; Potential for

bylC soil to leach into groundwater,
Navy!
.Reserve Plant, McGregor Area 0 Storage So~ 1 7 NO - 25.0 method. Groundwater to surface water State OERP
Marine Corps
CALOHS CommericaVlndustrial Worker
1997
STL
Perctdorale

bylC
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor AreaG Storage son 0 2 NO method. None State DERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on
CALOHS
1997
STL
Perchlorate

bylC
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor AreaG Storage Groundwater 0 4 NO method, None State OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on
CALOHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Area H storage area; Groundwater

Navy! bylC
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area H Storage Groundwater 15 32 NO' -41.0 to Surface Water; State OERP
Texas CommericaVlndustrial Worker
based on
CAlDHS
1997
STl
Perchlorate

bylC Area H storage area; Groundwater
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area H Storage Surface Water 2 4 NO-9.7 method, 10 Surface Water; State OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on CornmericaVlndustrial Worker
CALOHS
, . 1997
STl
Perctdorate Area H storage area; Potential for

bylC son to teach into groundwater.
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor AreaH Storage Soij 10 51 NO - 93,000.0 method, Groundwater to Surface Waler State OERP
Marine Corps
CAlOHS CommericaVlndustrial Worker
1997
Fije: PercOala_AJISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoratiof}-C!eanup. Other • Method 314 reporting limij is 4 ppb Page 210175
DoD PercJ1lorate Survey

Service Sltlli Summarl... Environmental Restoration. Cleanup, othcir
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Source of Perchlorate (Operations. Number of Analytlcat
Equlpment. Activities) Detections Method
sampling
requirements)
STL
Perchlorate
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor AreaH Storage Sediment 0 2 NO method, None Slate OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on
CALOHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Area 0 Industrial Area; Potential for
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial soil contamination to leach into
Navy! bylC
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area S Storage Soil 44 119 NO - 1,500,000.0 groundwater. Groundwater to State DERP
Texas surface water exposure pathway;
based on
Commericalllndustrial Worker
CALOHS
1997
STL
Perchlorate
Area 0 Industrial Area;
Navy! Groundwater to surface water
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area S Storage Sediment 1 4 NO - 120.0 method. State OERP
Marine Corps pathway; CommericaVlndustrial
Texas based on
Worker
CALOHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate Area 0 tndustrial Area;
Navy! bylC Groundwater to surface water
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area S Storage Groundwater 117 140 NO' 13,000.0 State DERP
Marine Corps method. pathway; Commericallindustrial
Texas
based on Worker
CALDHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate Area 0 Industrial Area;
Navy! bylC Groundwater to surface water
Reserve Plant. McGregor Area S Storage Surface Water 31 97 NO' - 810.0 State OERP
Marine Corps method. pathway; Commericalllndustrial
Texas
.. based on
CALOHS
Worker
1997
STL
Perchlorate
Navy!
Reserve Plant. McGregor Area A Soil 0 1 NO method, None State OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on
CALDHS
1997
FHe: PercOata_A1ISvcs_May6_
S~l: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Ott- , Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 22 of 75
DoD P~rate Survey

" J're ~r:vJce'81ti 8u~, EnVironmentafR,,_~ ·~"'UP. ~ 'rr' ;,:\ 'T' ,••<
, t'. 'i '[i, ;: ';(';','
Regulatory
Interest (Clearup
Equipment. AcUvitles) Detections Method
sampling
requirements)
STL
Perchlorate

bylC
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area A Groundwater 0 1 NO method, None State OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on
CALOHS
1997
EPA 314;
STL
Perchlorate
Naval Weapons Industrial Open Area; Groundwater

Navy! bylC
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area E Groundwater 5 21 NO" -40,0 recharges Surface Water; State OERP
Texas Cornmericallindusirial worker
based on
CALOHS
1997
STL
Perchlorate

bylC
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area E Soil 0 6 NO method, None State DERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on
CALOHS
1997
STL
Perchlorate

bylC
Navy!
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area E Surface Water 0 1 NO method, None State OERP
Marine Corps
Texas based on
CALOHS
1997
Potential human exposure pathway
via groundwater. Residential area is
Naval Weapons Station

7SHMWOO2 EPA 314 located adjacent to the base by IR
Navy!
Seal Beach Detachment Groundwater Oem~ilarizationiOisposal Groundwater 1 1 0.6 (modified)" S"e 22 and wh~e they are generaUy Federal; Stale OERP
Marine Corps
Concord MOMoring Well <MRL on a public water supply system,
,' local irrigation wells exist and iIlic"
potable wells may too,
via groundwater, Residential area
Naval Weapons Station

BUAMWOO2 EPA 314 located adjacent to the base and
Navy!
Seal Beach Detachment Groundwater DemililarizationlDisposal Groundwater 1 1 1,3" (modified) " while they are generally on a public Federal; Stale OERP
Marine Corps
Concord Mon"oring Well <MRL water supply system, local irrigation
wells exist and iIIil:" potable wells
may too,
F~: PercOata_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet' Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other " Method 314 reporting lim" is 4 ppb Page 23 of 75
DoD Perchlorate SUlvey

,"::' ;, ,c', ;
~ 8tI8 summanes • I:nVlrol1ln.ntal'~lOf8tJOrf ";~INnUPj other ';:V " :;';~i;;" </
;,."
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
1.ocation Number of Range of requested,
(Medta) Collected Detected (ppb) requirements,
sampling
requirements)

via groundwater, Residential area
Naval Weapons Station BUAMW010 EPA 314 located adjacent to the base and
Navy!
Seal Beach Detachment Groundwater Demil~arizatiorJDisposal Groundwater 1 1 0,6" (modified) " wh~e they are generally on a public Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps
Concord Momoring wen <MRL water supply system, local irrigation
wells exist and iIIic~ potable wells
\ may too.
Naval Weapons Station BUAMWOll·

Navy! EPA 314
Seal Beach Detachment Groundwater Demil~arizatiorJDisposal Groundwater 0 1 NO None Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps (modified)
Concord Momoring Well

via groundwater. Residential area
Naval Weapons Station BUAMW012 EPA 314 located adjacent to the base and
Navy!
Seal Beach Detachment Groundwater Dem~~arizatiorJDisposal Groundwater 2 2 07 - 2.0 (modified)' while they are generally on a public Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps
Concord Momoring Well <MRL water supply system, local irrigation
wells exist and iIlic~ potable wells
may too.
Naval Weapons Station TLSMWOO1·

Navy! EPA 314
Seal Beach Detachment Groundwater Dem~~arjzatiorJDisposal Groundwater 0 1 ND None Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps (modifred)
Concord ~oringWell
Naval Weapons Station TLSMWOO2

Navy! EPA 314
Seal Beach Detachment Groundwater Demil~rizatiorJDisposal Groundwater 0 1 NO None Federal; State DERP
Navy! EPA 314
Seal Beach Detachment Groundwater Dem~~arjzatiorJDisposal Groundwater 0 1 NO None Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps (modjfled)
Concord ~oringWell
Navy! EPA 314
Seal Beach Detachment Groundwater Demil~arjzatioNDisposal Groundwater 0 1 NO None Federal; State DERP
Naval Weapons Slation TLSMWOO5
Navy! EPA 314
Seat Beach Detachment Groundwater Demil~arizatiorJDisposal Groundwater 0 2 NO None Federal; State DERP
, Marine Corps (modjfred)
Concord ~oringWell
Navy! EPA 314
Seal Beach Detachment GrourJd~er Dem~~arjzatiorJDisposal Groundwater 0 1 NO None Federal; State DERP
Concord Mon~oring Well
Naval Weapons Station TLSMW007
Navy! EPA 314
Seal Beach Detachment Groundwater Dem~~arjzatiorJDisposal Groundwater 0 1 NO None Federal, State DERP
Marine Corps (modjfred)
The building is on the list to be
demolished in FY04. The building is
Surface
Bu~ding 411, currenlly vacated. The human O&M or Defense
Navy! NAVWPNSTA SEAL Water646
NWSSeaI Maintenance!Reconflguration Other 3 14 ND - 9,410,0 exposure pathway is present for None Working Ca~al
Marine Corps BEACHCA Method 9058,
Beach workers that will perform the Fund
IC
decontamination of the bu~ding prior
to demol~ion.
File: PercData_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoratio~eanup, Other " Method 314 reporling lim~ is 4 ppb Page 24 of 75
DOD Pen:hlorate Sul'"f8Y -' ,

..
~( ,"(
8eMce SIte Summaries· Envlronmtntal R"~. CI....u,:ottI~i"~i; . <, 'if L
to, 'i. i,'~,~
-"
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway{s) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
The bu'ding is on the list 10 be

demolished in FY04. The building is
Surface
BuDding 68, currently vacated. The t'tJman O&M or Delensa
Navy! NAVWPNSTA SEAL Waler846
NWSSeal MaintenanceiReconfiguralion Soil 4 7 ND - 2,460,0 exposure pathway is present lor None Working Capital
Marine Corps BEACHCA Method 9058.
IC
decontaminalion of the building priot
todemol~.
Surface
Building 68, O&M or Defense
NWSSeal MainlenanceiReconliguration Other 0 17 ND None None Working Capital
Marine Corps BEACHCA Method 9058.
Beach Fund
IC
The building is on the lisllo be
demolished in FY04, The bulding is
Surface
Building 75, currently vacated. The t'tJman O&M or Defense
NWSSeal MaintenanceIReconfoguration Other 1 27 ND -2,400,0 exposure palhway ;s present for None Working Capital
Marine Corps BEACHCA Method 9058,
IC
decontamination 01 the building priot
to demolition.
CA
Department
IR S~e6.
Navy! NAVWPNSTA SEAL Operational Tesling; of Health
Explosive Groundwater 0 5 ND None State DERP
Marine Corps BEACHCA Oemil~arizationiDisposat Services
Burning Ground
Perchlorate
Method
IR S~e 70.
Research
Navy! NAVWPNSTA SEAL Testing and Research. Development. Tesl and
Groundwater 0 1 ND EPA 314 None State DERP
Marine Corps BEACHCA Evaluation Area Evaluation
,
for Saturn II
Launch Vehicle
Navy! Surface Warfare Center S~e 12 Chemical

Dem~~arization/Disposal Groundwater 1 8 ND" - 7.6 EPA 314 Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps DAHLGREN Burn Area
Navy! Surface Warfare Center Site 15 Scrap

Oem~~arizationlDisposal Sediment 0 7 ND EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps DAHLGREN Area
Navy! Surface Warfare Center S~e 15 Scrap

Demil~arization/Disposal Soil 0 21 ND EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
Navy! Surface Warfare Center S~e 15 Scrap

Demilitarization/Disposal Groundwater 0 5 ND EPA 314 None Federal; Stale DERP
Navy! Surface Warfare Center ~e 15 Scrap

Demil~arizationlDisposal Surface Water 0 3 ND EPA 314 None Federal; Slate DERP
S'-I: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other " Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 25 of 75
" c,'. ' DoD p.JOrate f1u~ . , ' coo'

~ 8Ite~"·EinvirOn"",'R~on. ~9'P; ~If .,
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Service FaclUly Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposurelpermitting • Funding Type .
Equipment, Actlvltlesl Dalacllons Method
(Media) Collected Detaetad (ppb) requirements,
samprmg
requirements)
Navy I ISurface Warfare Center Site 4 Case

DemilitarizatiorVDisposal Soil I 1 I 15 NO" - 339.0 EPA 314 Federal; State I DERP'
Marine Corps DAHLGREN Storage Area
Navy I ISurface Warfare Center

Marine Corps DAHLGREN
Site 4 Case
Storage Area
Demilitarization/DiSposal ,Sediment 0 I 3 NO EPA 314 None Federal; State I DERP
Navy I ISurface Warfare Center Site 4 Case \I

Storage Area
Demilitarization/Disposal Groundwaler 0 5 I NO EPA 314 None Federal; Stale I DERP
Marine.Corps DAHLGREN
Navy I ISurface Warfare Center Site 4 Case

DemilitarizaliorilDisposal Surface Water I 0 I 1 NO EPA 314 None Federal; Stale DERP
Marine Corps DAHLGREN Storage Area
Navy I ,'Surface Warfare Center Site 40 Bldg.

120B DRMO Lot IDemilitarizationlDisposal Soil I 0 I 19 NO EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
Navy I ISurface Warfare Center Site 40 Bldg.
120B DRMa Lot IDemilitarizationlDisposai Grou(ldwater 0 8 NO EPA 314 None Federal, State I DERP
Navy I Isurface Warfare Center Site 61a Gambo IDemilitarization/Disposai Sediment 0 9 NO None Federal; State I DERP
Marine Corps DAHLGREN Creek Ash Dump
.
Navy I ISurface Warfare Center Site 61a Gambo IDemilitarizatiorVDisposal Soil I 0 I 30 NO None Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps DAHLGREN Creek Ash Dump
Navy I ISurface Warfare Center Site 61a Gamba IDemilitarization/Disposal

Creek Ash Dump
Surface Waler I 0 J 6 NO EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP

Site 61b Gambo

I
Creek Disposal Demilitarization/Disposal Sediment I 0 J 4 NO None Federal, State DERP
Area
Site 61b Gambo
Navy I lSurface Warfare Center

Creek Disposal IDemilitarization/Disposal Soil I 0 I 8 NO None Federal; Stale DERP
Area
Site 61bGambo

Creek Disposal IDemilitarization/Disposal Groundwater I 0 I 4 NO EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
Area
Site 61b Gambo
Navy I 'Surface Warfare Center I

Creek Disposal IDemilitarization/Disposal Surface Water I 0 I 4 I NO EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
Area
Navy I 1
Surface Warfare Center
Site 62 Bldg. 396lDemi~tarizatiorVOisposal Sediment I 0 I 1 I NO I EPA 314 None Federal; Stale I DERP
Navy I ISurface Warfare Center 0 10 NO EPA 314 None Federal; Stale I DERP
Site 62 Bldg. 396IDemilitarizationlDisposal Soil
Navy I 1
Surface Warfare Center
Site 62 Bldg. 3961 DemilitarizationlDisposal Groundwater 0 4 NO EPA 314 None Federal, Slate I DERP
File: PercData_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Clearup, Other

" Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 26 of 75
DoD Pen:hlol'8te Survey ~.j
S8Ntce SIte lUmmi'" • Envlronmental Restoration'. ~up. other
Regulatory
Interest (Clearop
Location Number of Range of requesled,
Service Facility Site Oetected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway!s) of Exposure permilting Funcllng Type
Equipment, ActivitIes) Detections Method
(Media) Collected Oetected (ppb) requirements,
sampling
requirements)
Navy/ Surface Warfare Center

Site 62 Bldg. 396 Dem~Karizalion/Disposal SlI1ace Water 0 1 NO EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
O&M or Defense
Navy/ Surface Warfare Center 0BI0D Outfall Research, Development, Test and
Surface Water 1 2 NO' - 7.4 EPA 314 None Working CapKal
Marine Corps DAHLGREN 012 Evaluation
Fund
O&M or Defense
Navy/ Surface Warfare Center Research, Development, Test and
DB/DO Wells Groundwater 7 9 NO' - 2,100.0 EPA 314 State Working CapKal
Marine Corps DAHLGREN Evaluation
Fund
Navy/. Surface Warfare Center Research, Development, Test and

SKe 62 Bldg. 396 Sediment 0 1 NO None Federal; State DERP

SKe 62 Bldg. 396 Soil 0 10 NO None Federal; State DERP

SKe 62 Bldg. 396 Groundwater 0 4 NO EPA314 None Federal; State DERP
~

SKe 62 Bldg 396 Surface Water 0 1 NO EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
SKe 2 Fenced
Navy/ Surface Warfare Center Research, Development. Test and
Ordnance Burial Groundwater 0 18 NO EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps DAHLGREN Evaluation; Dem~itarization/Disposal
Area
SKe 6 Terminal
Navy / Surface Warfare Center Research, Development, Test and
Range Airplane Groundwater 0 1 NO EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps DAHLGREN Evaluation; Dem~Karization/Disposal
Park
SKe9
Navy/ Surface Warfare Center Research, Development, Tesl and
Disposal/Burn Groundwater 0 10 NO EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps DAHLGREN Evaluation; Demilitarization/Disposal
Area
O&M or Defense
Navy/ Source Water
PATUXENT RIVER NAS No contamination sources. Groundwater 0 1 NO EPA 314 None None Working CapKal
Marine Corps Bldg 1633
Fund
O&M or Defense
Navy/ Source Water
PATUXENT RIVER NAS No contaminalion sources. Groundwater 0 1 NO EPA314 None None Working Capital
Fund.
O&M or Defense
Navy/ Source Waler
PATUXENT RIVER NAS No contamination sources. Groundwater 0 1 NO EPA 314 None None Working Cap"al
Fund
O&M or Delense
Navy/ Source Water
PATUXENT RIVER NAS No contamination sources. Groundwater 0 1 NO EPA 314 None None Working CapKal
Fund
Fie: PercDala_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleaoop, Other

, Method 314 reporting limK is 4 ppb Page 27 of 75
DoD Percblorat8 Survey
}o ci _. .~
Regulalory
Inleresl (Cleanup
Source of Perchlorate {Operations, Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway{s) of Exposure permilling FUnding Type
(Medla) Collected Detected (ppb) requirements,
sampling
requirements)
O&M Of Defense
Navy! Source Water
PATUXENT RIVER NAS No contamination sources. Groundwater 0 1 ND EPA 314 None None Working Cap~al
Fund
O&M Of· Defense

Navy! Source Water
PATUXENT RIVER NAS No contamination sources. Groundwater 0 1 ND EPA 314 None None Working Capital
Marine Corps Bldg 529 -
\ Fund
O&M Of Defense
Navy! Source Water
PATUXENT RIVER NAS No contamination sources. GrOUndwater 0 1 ND EPA 314 None None Working Capital
Fund
O&M or Defense
Navy! Source Water
Fund
O&M Of Defense
Navy! Source Water
Fund
,
O&M or Defense
Navy! Source Water
Fund
O&M or Defense
Navy! Source Water
Fund
, O&M or Defense
Navy! Source Water
Fund
O&M Of Defense
Navy! Source Water
Fund
O&M Of Defense
Navy! Source Water
PATUXENT RIVER NAS No contamInation sources. Groundwater 0 1 ND EPA314 None None Working Cap~al
Fund
O&M or Defense
Navy! Source Water
PATUXENT RIVER NAS No contamination sources. Groundwater 0 2 NO EPA314 None None Working Cap~1
Fund
O&M or Defense
Navy! Source Water
PATUXENT RIVER NAS No contamination sources. Groundwater 0 1 NO EPA 314 None None Working Cap~al
Fund
F~e: PercDala_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet Env Restoralion-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting Iim~ is 4 ppb Page 26 of 75
,.-. ."
·' ~ " ,.
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Source of Perchlorate (Operations. Humber of Analytical
(Media) Collected Detected (ppbl requirements,
sampling
requirements)
Lualualei Static
Navy I PEARL HARBOR
Rocket Motor Operational Testing Soil 0 9 NO EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps NAVMAG
Test FacUily
Installation
Restoration Sile
14 wells MW01.
Navy I EPA 314
PORT HUENEME CBC MW02,MW03. None has been determined. Groundwater 0 \ 1 NO None State DERP
MW04.MW16.
MW17.MW18,
andMW19.
California
Sile 20 - Area A Melhod
Determination
Navy I SUBASE NEW LONDON Weapons Center
Groundwater 0 1 NO 01 Perchlorate None Federal; Slate DERP
Marine Corps CT - Monlloring Well
by Ion
2WCMW1S Chromatograp
hy
California
SUe 20 - Area A Method
Determination
Groundwater 0 1 NO 01 Perchlorate None Federal, State DERP
Marine Corps CT - Monitoring Well
by Ion
hy
California
Site 20 - Area A Method·
Determination
Groundwater 0 1 NO 01 Perchlorate None Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps CT - Monitoring Well
by Ion
hy
California
Sile 20 - Area A Method-
Detennlnalion
Groundwater 0 1 NO 01 Perchlorate None Federal; Slate DERP
Marine Corps CT - Moniloring Well
by Ion
2WCMW4D Chrom8tograp
,' hy
Califomia
Sile 7 - Torpedo Method •
Determination
Navy I SUBASE NEW LONDON Shops
Groundwater 0 2 NO of Perch10rate None Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps CT Monitoring Well
by Ion
7MW10S Chromatograp
hy
File: PercData_AJISvcs_May6_
Sheet Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting Iimll is 4 ppb Page 290175
.>',"
. ,.i,,~ ,.4":11;',, ~ SIte ~1l1Ml8ll". E"vi"nmentWlt"tOOmon~Ci.~~':·(- . ; .. .{;;ie., :; :'

~.
'.., i~~~r
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Location Number of Range 01 requested.
sampling
requirements)
California
Site 7 - Torpedo Method -
Determination
Navy! SUBASE NEW LONDON Shops
Groundwater 0 1 NO of Perchlorate None Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps CT Monitoring Well by Ion
7MW11S Chromalograp
hy
\ CalWomia
Site 7 - Torpedo Metho<l-
DeterminatJon
Groundwater 0 2 NO of Perchlorate None Federal; Stale DERP
7MW5S Chromatograp
hy
California
Method-
Site 7 - Torpedo
Determination
Groundwater 0 1 NO of Perchlorate None Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps CT Monitoring Well by Ian
7MW6S Chromatograp
hy
California
Method •
Site 7 - Torpedo
Determination
Groundwater 0 1 NO of Perchlorate None Federal; Slate bERP
7MW7S Chromatograp
hy
CalWornia
Site 7 - Torpedo Method -
Determination
Marine Corps CT Monitoring Well
, Groundwater 0 1 NO of Perchlorate None Federal; State DERP
by Ion
7MW8S Chromatograp
hy
California
Site 7 - Torpedo Melho<l-
Determination
Groundwater 0 1 NO of Perchlorate None Federal; Slate DERP
Marine Corps CT Monitoring wen by Ion
7MW9S Chromatograp
hy
California
Site 7 - Torpedo Melho<l-
Determination
Groundwater 0 1 NO of Perchlorate None Federal, Slate DERP
Marine Corps CT Temporary Well by Ion
7TW10 Chromatograp
hy
Fie: PercData_AlISvcs_May6_
Sheel: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other

• Method 314 reporting limij is 4 ppb Page 3001 75
:"'.
'., ~:..
semce'"' Su~.,.~E~ronmental~tQ~tIon. ~up. ~ . " "
:t ":;":: : '!;;ij:;~':::
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Service Fscillty Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permilling Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
California
S~e 7 - Torpedo
Melhod •
Determination
Navy! SUBASE NEW LONDON Shops •
Groundwater 0 1 NO of Perchlorale None Federal; State OERP
Marine Corps CT Temporary Well
by Ion
7TW8 Chromatograp
hy
\ California
~e 7 - Torpedo Melhod·
Determination
Navy! SUBASE NEW LONDON Shops·
Groundwater 0 1 NO of Perchlorate None Federal; State OERP
Marine Corps CT Temporary Well
by Ion
7TW9 Chromatograp
hy
Investigation .
Area Fl. Former
Navy! VALLEJO CA MARE IS
Production Storage Groundwater 0 11 NO EPA 314 None State BRAC
Marine Corps NSY
MarlJfacturing
Area (PMA)
Potential pathway under residential

Navy! White Oak Surface 07GroundwaterO
Demil~arizationiOisposal Groundwater 4 4 12.0·16.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAG
groundwater for potable use.

Navy! Whne Oak Surface 07Groundwaterl
Oem~narizationiOisposal Groundwater 2 3 NO-9.4 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; Slale BRAG
Navy! While Oak Surface 07Groundwalerl

OemUnarizationiOisposal Groundwater 0 4 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAG
Marine Corps Warfare Center 02 ,

Navy! Whne Oak Surface 07Groundwaterl
DemU~arizationiOisposal Groundwater 2 4 NO-290 E300.Q. reuse scenario if residents access Federal; Stale BRAG

Navy! White Oak Surface 07Groundwaterl
DemU~arizationiOisposal Groundwater 4 5 NO - 13.3 E3000 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAG
Marine Corps Warfare Center 04 "

Navy! While Oak Surface 07Groundwaterl
OemilnarizationiOisposal Groundwater 3 3 8.0·9.9 E3000 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAG
groundwater fur potable Use

Navy! While Oak Surface 07Groundwater4
Demil~arizationiOisposal Groundwater 1 5 NO-5.3 E3000 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; Stale BRAe
Navy! Whne Oak Surface 07Groundwater4

OemilnarizationiOisposal Groundwater 0 6 NO E3000 None Federal; State BRAG
Fie; PercOata_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sree\: Env RestoraliorrCleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 31 of 75
,,": DoO Percl1l0rate SUrv-yr: . .'' ' / ",

'<}'. r:
~ ,.:
~8lte i"~~Erivtronrnenat R~()fl, (;J""'yj). ~r
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Location
I Number of I Number of I Range of 1 A I I I I
Service I Facility I Site I
Source of Perchlorate (Operations,
Equipment, Activities) I Detected
(Media) Detections Collected Detected (ppb)
requested,
Samples Concentrations :::: Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting • I Funding Type .
requirements,
sampling
requirements)
I I I I I I I I
Navy! While Oak Surface
07PZ42 1Dem~ttarizationlDisposai I
Groundwater I 0 I 3 I NO ' I E300,O INone IFederal; State I BRAC'
Navy! White Oak Surface 02Groundwater1 NA

Groundwater 0 4 NO E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 02Groundwater1 \ E300.0; EPA

NA Groundwater 0 4 NO 314 1None IFederal; Slate I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Genter 03
Navy! While Oak Surface 02Groundwater1 E300.0; EPA

04
NA Groundwater 0 4 NO
314 1None IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 02Groundwater1 NA E300.0; EPA

Groundwater 0 4 NO
314 1None IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Genter 05
Navy! White Oak Surface 02Groundwater3 NA Groundwater 0 4 NO E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC

NA Groundwater 0 5 NO IFederal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 1 314 1None I

MarineCorps Warfare Center 2
314 I
IN
one
IFederal; Siale I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 02Groundwater4 E300.0; EPAIN

314 I one
IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 02Groundwater7 E300.0; EPAlNone

NA
, Groundwater 0 4 NO
314
IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! Whtte Oak Surface 02SB1OO!2Grour E300.0; EPA

dwater100
314
None IFederal; Slate I BRAC

Navy! While Oak Surface 02SB101!2Grour E300.0; EPA
NA Groundwater 1 4 NO - 5.9 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center dwate~1p1 314
Navy! While Oak Surface 03Groundwater1 NA

Groundwater 0 5 NO E3000 None IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 03Groundwater1 INA

04
IGroundwater I 0 I 3 I NO I E3000 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 03Groundwater1

lNA IGroundwater I 0 I 3 I NO I E3000 INone IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy! While Oak SlIface 03Groundwater1 INA

7
IGroundwater I 0 I 4 I NO I E300,0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
S'-t: Em Restoration-Cleanup, Other

• Method 314 repor1ing limn is 4 ppb Page 32 of 75
000 PerehlOt'll(e 8~ey
·v , '. ~ ....... ~~ __,.... ... -_••••,"'"......,.MQ
~ ~_~ .....UllI - '!'~ ...... 0Iil ,.,
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Source of Perchlorate ~Operatlons, Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Oetected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
Equipment, ActivIties) Oetectlons Method
(Media) Collected Oetected (ppb) requirements,
sampling
requirements)

NA Groundwater 0 4 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC

Navy! While Oak Surface 03Groundwater4 \


NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None Federal; Slate BRAC
Navy" Wh~e Oak Surface 03Groundwater7

Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface 03Groundwater7

NA Groundwater 0 5 NO E3oo.0 None Federal; State BRAC

03SP201 NA Groundwater 0 2 NO E3oo.0 None Federal; Slate BRAC
Marine Corps Warlare Center

03SP202 NA Groundwater 0 1 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 03Surlace

NA Surface Water 0 2 NO E3oo.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center Water102
Navy! While Oak Surface O4Groundwater1


NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None Federal; Slate BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface O4Groundwaler1

Marine Corps Warlare Center 01
Navy! While Oal< Surface O4Groundwater1

.
NA Groundwater 0 2 NO E3000 None Federal; State BRAC

NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E3000 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 04Groundwaler1

Fie: PercOata_AIISvcs_Mayll_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 33 of 75
PoDPerchiorete St!rv!JJ . . i . / t ,-he;. •'i "c. , .. '. ..",

....~ snc. Summaut-· ElWItOr'!tnenta'R~ ~ Cleanup, ~ "i -:",::ev.: ". iC! • .. '.' '
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Location Number of Range of I requested.
Source of Perchlorate (Operations. Datected Number of Samples Concentrations Analytlca Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permilling Funding Type
Service Facility Site Equipment, Activities) (Media) Datectlons Collected Detected (ppb) Method requirements.
sampling
requirements)
Navy I WMe Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E3oo.0 None Federal; Stale BRAC
Navy I Wh~e Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E3oo.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I WMe Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 NA Groundwater 0 \ 5 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I WMe Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 NA Groundwater 0 4 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I WMe Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 NA Groundwater 0 2 NO E3oo.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I WMe Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I WMe Oak Surface 04Groundwaler1 NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E3oo.0 None Federal; Stale BRAC
Navy I White Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E3OO0 None Federal; State BRAC

Navy I WMe Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 NA Groundwater 2 3 NO. 76.0 E300.0 reuse scenario nresidents access Federal; Stale BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 5 groundwater for potable use.
Navy I Wh~e Oak Surface 04Groundwater2 N A ' Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None Federal; Siale BRAC
Navy I White Oak Surface 04Groundwater2 NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I Wh~e Oak Surface 04Groundwater2 NA Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None Federal; Slate BRAC
Navy I White Oak Surface 04Groundwater4 NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E3oo.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I White Oak Surface 04Groundwater4 NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Potential Pathway under residential

Navy I WMe Oak Surface 04Groundwaler5 NA Groundwater 1 6 NO _9.3 E3oo.0 reuse scenario nresidents access Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 0 groundwater for potable use.
File: PercOata_AnSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other • Method 314 reporting Iim~ is 4 ppb Page 34 of 75
, .. ,',
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathwsy(s) of Exposure permitting Fundtng Type
Equipment, Activities) Detections Met.hod
(Medial Collected Detected (ppb) requirements.
sampling
requirements)
Navy! Whije Oak Sutface 04Groundwater5

Marine Corps Warfare Carter 2
Navy! Whije Oak Surface 04Groundwater7

\ Potential pathway under residential

NA Groundwater 3 4 NO -10.0 E3oo.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
groundwater for potable Use.


NA Groundwaler 0 3 NO E3000 None Federal; State BRAC

NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E3000 None Federal. Stale BRAC
Navy! Whije Oak Surface

04PZ89 NA Groundwater 0 4 NO" E3oo.0 None Federal. State BRAC
Navy! Whije Oak Sutface OSGroundwaterO

Navy! Whije Oak Surface 05GroundwaterO

Navy! Whije Oak Surface

08Groundwater3
3
NA
. Groundwater 0 3 NO E3oo.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! While Oak Sutface 08Groundwater3

Navy! WMe Oak Surface 08Groundwater3


NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None Federal. State BRAC

NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E3oo.0 None Federal. State BRAC
Navy! WMe Oak Surface 13GroundwaterO

NA Groundwater 0 4 NO E300.0 None Federal. State BRAC
Navy! WMe Oak Surface 13GroundwaterO

NA Groundwater 0 5 NO E3000 None Federal. State BRAC
Fie: PercOata_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Resloration-Clearop, Other

• Method 314 reporting hmij is 4 ppb Page 35 ot 75
DoD Perchlora.. SUrvey", ', .
</' \
. ~ 81te ~. EnvlrqnmentaJ R~ .Clear!Up~Other
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Source of Perchlorate (Operations. Number of Analytlcal
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposurelpermilting Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy I IWhite Oak Surface

13GroundwaterO INA
3
Groundwater o 5 NO E3oo.0 INane Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWhile Oak Surface 13GroundwaterO INA

Groundwater o 4 NO E3oo.0 INone Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWhite Oak Surface 13Groundwater2 INA

Groundwater o 3 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWhile Oak Surface 13Groundwater2 INA

Groundwater o NO EPA 314 INone Federal; State BRAC
Navy I I White Oak Surface 13Groundwater2 INA

Groundwater o 2 NO EPA 314 INane Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWhile Oak Surface

2OWP01 NA Groundwater o 2 NO E300.0 INone Federal; Slate BRAC

2OWP02 NA Groundwater o NO E3OO0 INone Federal; State BRAC

20WP03 NA Groundwater o NO E300.0 INone Federal; Slate BRAC
1,
Navy I IWhite Oak Surface
35WP01 NA Groundwater o NO E300.0 tNone Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWh~e Oak Surface

35WP02 NA Groundwater o NO E3oo.0 INane Federal; State BRAC

35WP03 NA Groundwater o NO E3oo.0 INane IFederal; Slate BRAC

40WP01 NA Groundwater 420
E3oo.0 lreuse scenario il residents access (Federal; State BRAC
groundwater lor potable use.

47WP01 NA Groundwater 6.0
E300.0 Ireuse scenario nresidents access (Federal; State BRAC

47WP02 NA Groundwater o NO E3oo.0 INone IFederal, Slate BRAC

47WP05 NA Groundwater o 2 NO E3oo.0 INane IFederal; State BRAC
File: PercOata_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet· Env Restoralior>-Cleanup, Other • Methcxt 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 36 of 75
~
~. . DoD Perchl~ SUI'YtY
8e..... ~rt..'. Envlron_mentalR~;;~"UP:~
.. ",;.;... .~:;' .
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(sl of Exposurel permitting Funding Type
Equipment. Actlvltlesl Detections Method
(Medial Colklc:ted Detected (ppbl requirements,
sampling
requirements)
Navy I IWhHe Oak Surface 49Groundwater2 NA o

1 Groundwater NO EPA 314 INone Federal; Slate BRAC
Navy J IWhile Oak Surface 49Groundwater2 (NA Groundwater o NO EPA 314 INone Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWhile Oak Surface 49Groundwater2

Marine Corps Warfare Center 01S
1NA Groundwater o NO EPA 314 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWhHe Oak Surface 49Groundwater2

Marine Corps Warfare Center 02S
lNA Groundwater o 2 NO EPA 314 INone Federal; State BRAC
Navy r IWhile Oak Surface 49Groundwater2 INA Groundwater o NO EPA 314 INone Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWhde Oak Surface 49Groundwater2 INA Groundwater o EPA 314 INone Federal; State
NO BRAC
Navy I IWhde Oak Surface Groundwater o NO EPA 314 INone Federal; State
5OOST01 NA BRAC
Navy I IWhile Oak Surface 500Surface

Marine Corps Warfare Center WaterSEEP
NA Surface Water o NO E3000 INone Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWhile Oak Surface 87WP01 NA Groundwater o NO E3oo.0 INone Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWhile Oak Surface Groundwater o NO E300.0 INone Federal; State

87WP02 NA BRAC
Navy I IWhile Oak Surface 87WP03 NA Groundwater o NO E3oo.0 INone Federal; Stale BRAC
Navy I I
White Oak Surface
A-D1 NA Groundwater o 2 NO E3oo.0 INone Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWhile Oak Surface Groundwaler o 2 NO E3oo.0 INone Federal; Stale

A-D2 NA BRAC
Navy I \While Oak Surface A-D3 NA Groundwater o 2 NO E300.0 INone Federal, State BRAC
Navy I IWhile Oak Surface A-Q4 Nil. Groundwater o 2 NO E3oo.0 INone Federal, State BRAC
Navy I IWhHe Oak Surface ARL,502 SUMP INA Groundwater o 2 NO E3000 INone Federal, State BRAC
Sheet· Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other

• Method 314 reporting limd is 4 ppb Page 37 0175
:,<.~? ",0< ~
· 1:,' '., " DoD p~te Ik!!'!'(" ,."/~.l;~;.
~ S1~ $~".'nvIl"OJ1~t,~. .tlI~:~~I..nup.0Ul......
',,''.
Regulatory
Interest (Cleaoop
Source of Perchlorste (Operations. Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Psthway(sl of Exposurel permitting Funding Type .
(Medisl Collected Detected (ppbl requirements.
sampling
requirements)
Navy I IWhne Oak Surface

ARL-STS-AS NA Groundwater 2 15 NO' - 4.0
E300 O' EPAIPoiential pathway under residential
314 reuse scenario if residents access /Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWhne Oak Su1ace

ARL-STS-AS INA Other o 3 NO EPA 314 INone Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWhite Oa.k Surface ARL-STS-INF INA Groundwater o NO E300.0 INone Federal; State BRAC
E300 O' EPA IPotential pathway under residential

Navy I IWhne Oak Surface NO' -7.0
ARL-STS-OF NA Groundwater 3 23 314 reuse scenario if residents access (Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWhne Oak Surface

ARL-STS-OF NA Other o 3 NO EPA 314 INone Federal; State BRAC

ARL-SUMP NA Other o 4 NO EPA 314 INone Federal; State BRAC
Navy I IWhne Oak Surface E300.0; EPA

ARL-SUMP NA Groundwater o 13 NO
314
1None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I jWMe Oak Surface ARL-Surface

NA Surface Water 3 10 NO' - 4.5 314
I
E300 O' EPA Potential pathway under residential
reuse scenario if residents access (Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center WaterS-AS
Potential pa/hway under residential

Navy I IWMe Oak Surface ARL-Surface
NA Groundwater 6 8 NO' - 5.8 EPA 314 Ireuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center WaterS-AS
ARL-Surface E300 0 EPAIPotential pathway under residential

Navy I IWhile Oak Surface NO'-110
NA Surface Water 3 9 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center WaterS-INF
groundwater for potable use

Navy I IWhne Oak Surface ARL-Surface
NA Groundwater 5 8 NO' - 8.0 EPA 314 Ireuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Stale BRAG
Marine Corps Warfare Center WaterS-INF
groundwater for potable use,
Navy I I
WMe Oak Surface ARL-Surface
NA Surface Water 10 17 NO' -7 0 314
I
E300 O' EPA Potential pathway under residential
reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State BRAG
Marine Corps Warfare Center WaterS-OF
Potenlial pathway under residential

Navy I IWhne Oak Surface ARL-Surface
NA Groundwater 8 11 NO' -8A EPA 314 Ireuse scenario if residents access IFederal. Stale BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center WaterS-CF
F~e. PercOala_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet· Em Restoralior>-Cleanup. Other , Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 38 0175
DODrerchl~ 8u~
.. ,
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
locallon Number of Range of requested.
Source of Perchlorate IOperallons, Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathwayls) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
IMedla) Collected Detected Ipltb) requirements.
sampling
requirements)
Navy I White Oak Surface

B-1 NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I WMe Oak Surface

B-3 NA Groundwater 0 1 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I WMe Oak Surface BGGroundwater \


Navy I WMe Oak Surface BGGroundwater
NA Groundwater 1 2 NO - 11.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
Navy I WMe Oak Surface BGroundwaterl0

Marine Corps Warfare Center O/BG

Marine Corps Warfare Center l/BG

Marine Corps Warfare Center 2/BG

C-Q5 NA Groundwater 6 6 14.2 - 71.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
Navy I Whtte Oak Surface E300.0; EPA

C-Q6 NA Groundwater 0 20 NO None Federal; State BRAC

NavY I WMe Oak Surface E300.0; EPA
C-Q7 NA Groundwater 1 15 NO' - 5.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
Navy I Whtte Oak Surface

C-Q8 NA Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC

C-QQ NA Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC

Navy I WhKe Oak Surface
C-l0 NA Groundwater 1 2 NO - 7.4 E3000 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC

C-ll NA Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None Federal. Stale BRAC

C-12 NA .Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
File: PercOata_AHSvcs_May6_
SMa\: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other • Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 39 of 75
. 000 Perchlorate Survey
c', 61 riM • Environmental Reatoratl Cleal .. o1het ,
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permilling Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy I White Oak Surface

C-13 NA Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I Wh~e Oak Surface

C-14 NA Groundwater 0 5 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I W~e Oak Surface

,
C-15 NA Groundwater 0 2 NO E3000 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I White Oak Surface E300.0; EPA

CHARLTON NA Groundwater 5 15 NO' - 9.7 Federal. State BRAC

Navy I W~e Oak Surface E300.0; EPA
EW01 NA Groundwater 4 22 NO' - 19.0 reuse scenario II residents access Federal; Slate BRAC

EW02 NA Groundwater 18 20 NO' -190 reuse scenario II residents access Federal; State BRAC

Navy I Wh~e Oak Surface E300.0; EPA
EW03 NA Groundwater 19 20 NO' -14.8 reuse scenario II residents access Federal; State BRAC

EW04 NA Groundwater 5 23 NO' -6.0 reuse scenario II residents access Federal; State BRAC
, Potential pathway under residential

EW05 NA Groundwater 3 21 NO' - 8.7 reuse scenario II residents access Federal; State BRAC
Marfne Corps Warfare Center 314

Navy I Wh~e Oak Surface E300.0; EPA
EW06 NA Groundwater 20 21 NO' • 12.0 reuse scenario II residents access Federal; State BRAC
HP-Surface
WaterlSediment- NA Surface Water 0 1 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
01
HP-Surface

Water/Sediment- NA Surface Water 0 1 NO E3000 None Federal; State BRAC
02
HP-Surface

WaterlSediment- NA Surface Water 0 1 NO E300.0 None Federal. State BRAC
03

Navy I W~e .Oak Surface E3000. EPA
IRBY-TAP NA Groundwater 1 34 NO' -4.0 reuse scenario II residents access Federal; State BRAC
File: PercOata_AJISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Clearvp. Other , Method 314 repor1ing jim~ is 4 ppb Page 40 of 75
DoD Perchlo,.. Sll;OY

~If~~up.other
, .- ,
.'S '" ,',. '::
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Location Number of Range of requesled,
Source of Perchlorate (Operatlona. Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
Equipment, ActiVities) Detectlona Method
(Media) Col/acted Detected (ppb) requirements,
sampling
requirements)
Navy! White Oak Surface ND E300.0

LIGHTFOOT NA Groundwater 0 1 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface OU2Surface

NA Surface Water 0 2 ND EPA 314 None Federal; Slate BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface OU2Surface \

NA Surface Water 0 1 ND EPA 314 None Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Genler Water02

NA Surface Water 0 1 ND EPA 314 None Federal; Slate BRAC

Marine Corps Warfare Center Watet04
Navy! While Oak Surface OU2Surface

NA Surface Water 0 1 ND EPA 314 None Federal, State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center WaterOS

Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface PBSurface

NA Surface Water 0 1 ND E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface PBSurface

NA Surface Water 0 2 ND E3000 None Federal; State BRAC

NA Surface Water 0 1 ND E3000 None Federal; State BRAC

NA Surface Water 0 1 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC




Navy! White Oak Surface
Q-WP-01 NA Groundwater 1 1 60 E3000 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center groundwater for potable use
Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface

Q-WP-Q2 NA Groundwater 0 1 ND E3000 None Feder"l. State BRAC
File: PercData_A1ISvcs_Mayti_
Sheet· Env Restoration-Cleaoop, Other

• Method 314 repor1ing lim~ is 4 ppb Page 41 of 75
DOD Percnlora~ .JJUIWY ;;":}: '~',.,;.
,~~:.;:;'f
.. ".,.,,/ :"'\', ~ ~
"./' .'.
~.$I,te SUllimarl..• EnyJron~Rtt.~ort"I:"""lIjother '.< :;:,'r·;: '. r}( "~I~:';'i:~(L:jf;, )c;~1t'j
Regulatory
Interest (CIearlJf)
sampling
requirements)
Navy! Whne Oak Surtace

WOS..()101 NA WasteWater 0 1 ND EPA 314 None Federal; State BRA~
Navy! Whne Oak Surface

WOS..()104 NA WasteWater 0 1 ND EPA 314 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! WMe Oak Surtace \

WOS..()402 NA WasteWater 0 1 ND EPA 314 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! WMe Oak Surface

WOS..Q602 NA WasteWater 0 1 ND EPA 314 None Federal; State BRAC

WOS..()72A NA Other 0 1 ND EPA 314 None Federal; State BRAC

WOS·PS02 NA WasteWater 0 2 ND EPA 314 None Federal; Slate BRAC
Navy! WMe Oak Surtace Research, Development, Test and

09DP223 Groundwater 0 1 ND EPA 314 None Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center Evaluation
Navy! WMe Oak Surface Research, Development, Test and

Navy! Whne Oak Surface Research, Development, Test and


09DP226 Groundwater 0 1 ND EPA 314 None Federat; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center Evaluation ,

Navy! WMe Oak Surface Research, Development, Test and
09DP227 Groundwater 1 1 192.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario ~ residents access Federal; State BRAC

09DP228 Groundwater 1 1 106.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario ~ residents access Federal; Stale BRAC

09DP229 Groundwater 1 1 218.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario ~ residents access Federal; State BRAC

Navy! WMe Oak Surface Research. Development, Test and
09DP231 Groundwater 1 1 24 1 EPA 314 reuse scenario ~ residents access Federal; Stale BRAC
File: PercDala_AfISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoralio""Cleanup, Other

• Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 42 of 75
DoD PWtloral8 SU'Y8Y . '.' " :!'3:',";,;;;'" -',;,'< 1;. , :;.
~ SIte 8u.......I'1~ ..~ron"'"'... -~:.C!tanup"~;ic···
"
.. •
Regulatory

Source of Perchlorate (Operations.
Equipment, Acttvltlesl I
Location
Detected
(Medial
I I I I .I Number of Range of
Number of Samples Concentrations
Detections Collected Detected (ppbl
~a~,~aI
et 0
requested,
Interest (Cleaoop
Potential Pathway(sl of Exposure permitting

requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy! IWhile Oak Surface

I09DP232
IResearch, Development, Test and
Evaluation
IGrOUndwater
I I
1 1
I
28.0
I
EPA 314 Ireuse scenario if residents access Federal; State
, BRAC
-
Navy ! IWh~e Oak Surface Research, Development, Test and
09DP233 Groundwater 1 1 13.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Stale I BRAC
\ groundwater for potable use.
Navy! While Oak Surface Research. Development, Test and

09DP234 Groundwater 0 1 NO EPA 314 None IFederal; State I BRAC
Marin!l Corps Warfare Center Evalualion
Navy! While Oak Surface Research, Development, Test and

09DP235
Evaluation
Groundwater 0 1 NO EPA 314 None IFederal; State I BRAC

Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface Research, Development. Test and
09DP236
Evaluation
Groundwater 1 1 513 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Slate I BRAC

Navy! IWhite Oak Surface 09GroundwaterO Research, Development, Test and E3oo.0; EPA
Marine Corps Wa.rfare Center 1 Evaluation
Groundwater 9 11 NO' - 798.0
314
reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface 09GroundwalerO Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 4 NO E3OO0 None IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 2 Evalualion

Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface 09GroundwaterO Research, Development. Tesl and
Marine Corps Warfare Center 3 Evaluation
Groundwater 1 3 NO - 5.0 E3oo.0 reuse scenario if residents access 'Federal; State 1 BRAC
Navy! IWhite Oak Surface

09GroundwaterO Research, Development, Test and
4 Evaluation
Groundwater 1 3 ND-ll.2 E300.0
reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 09GroundwalerO Research, Development, Test and

Evaluation
Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None 'Federat. State I BRAC

6 Evaluation
IGroundwater I 0 , 7 I NO I E3oo.0 INone IFederal.; State I BRAC
Navy! Whfte Oak Surface

7 Evaluation
]Groundwater , 0 J 3 I NO , E3oo.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 09Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 3 NO E3OO0 None IFederal; State I BRAC

09Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and
01 Evaluation
Groundwater 1 5 NO -7 0 E3000
Potential pathway under resident.al
reuse scenario if residents access 'Federal, State
, BRAC
File: PercData_AnSvcs_May6_
Sheel. Env Restoration-Cleaoop, Other • Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 43 of 75
: ;1,'" ~ ...~ . . . I""I!' .................. - .......",..,...!....... ..._~.-..- •• - -.~ ........ ...._. " .~. -¥;' , <,;, ',
Regulatory
Interest (Clearop
Location Number of Range ,of requested,
Service Facility Site Detected Samples COlICentratlons Potential Pathway(s) of Exposun permitting Funding Type ,
sampling
requirements)
Navy! White Oak Surface 09Groundwater1 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 4 ND E300,O None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! Wh~e Oak SlI1ace 09Groundwater1 Research, Development, Tesl and

Groundwater 2 7 ND - 11,5 E300,0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface 09Groundwater1 Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 0 3 ND E300,0 None Federal; State BRAC


Groundwater 4 5 ND·16,0 E3000 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
Groundwater 0 5 ND E3000 None Federal; State BRAC

Navy! White Oak Surface 09Groundwater1 Research, Developmenl, Test and

Navy! White Oak Surface 09Groundwater 1 Research, Development, Test and

Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface 09Groundwaler1 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 1 3 ND·40 E300,O reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC

Groundwater 3 3 7,0·8,0 E300,O reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC

Marine Corps Warfare Center OOD Eval'!ation
Groundwater 0 2 ND E300,0 None Federal; Slate BRAC

Marine Corps Warfare Center OOS ' ' Evaluation
Groundwater 0 2 ND E300,0 None Federal;' State BRAC

Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface 09Groundwater2 Research, Developmenl, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare Center 01S Evaluation
Potential pathway under resident.al
Navy! Wh~e Oak SlI1ace 09Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 1 1 4,9 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access Federal, State BRAC
Fie: PercData_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other

• Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 44 of 75
DoD Perehlorate8urvey. . .. .
8eNIce S1tlt Summaries· EnvironmentSl Restciratkm • tteanup, Oihw ~>
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Location Number of Range of requestlld.
EqUipment, Activities) Detections Method
sampling
requirements)

Groundwater 0 1 NO None Federal; State BRAC
White Oak Surface 09Groundwater2 Research. Development, Test and Potential pathway under residential
Navy!
Groundwater 1 1 309 EPA 314 reuse scenario Wresidents access Federal; State BRAC
Potential paltrNay under residential

Groundwater 4 4 24.0 - 180.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario Wresidents access Federal; Slate BRAC
groundwater for potable USB.
White Oak Surface Potential pathway under residential

Navy! 09Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 2 2 11.0 - 25.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario Wresidents access Federal; State BRAC
While Oak Surface Potential pathway under residential

Navy! 09Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 2 2 160.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario Wresidents access Federal; State BRAC

Navy! White Oak Surface 09Groundwater2 Research, Development. Test and
Groundwater 4 4 10.0 - 200.0 EPA 314 reuSB scenario Wresidents access Federal; State BRAC
groundwater for potable USB.

Navy! While Oak Surface 09Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 2 4 NO' 180.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario Wresidents access Federal; State BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface Potential pathway under residential

09Groundwater2 Research, Development. Test and
Groundwater 1 1 12.0 EPA 314 reuSB scenario Wresidents access Federal. State BRAC
White Oak Surface OgGroundwater2 Research. Development. Test and Potential pathway under residential
Navy! EPA 314
Groundwater 4 4 2.2' - 5.5 reuse scenario Wresidents access Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 12 Evaluation • < MRL
Navy! White Oak Surface 09Gr~.ter2 Research, Development, Test and Potential pathway under residential
Groundwater 8 8 160.0 - 880.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario Wresidents access Federal; State BRAC

09Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 3 4 NO' - 330.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario Wresidents access Federal; Slate BRAC
Wh~e Oak Surface

Navy! 09Groundwater3 Research, Development. Test and
Groundwater 1 1 210.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario Wresidents access Federal, State BRAC
F~e: PercOala_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 repor1ing lim~ is 4 ppb Page 45 of 75
DoD Perchlorate SUrvey .
SeNIce SIte Summartes "Environmental RestoratIOn" Cleanup, Other
Regulatory
lntefest (Cleanup
Source of Perchlorate (Operation., Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Sample. Concentrations Potential Pathway(sl of Exposure permitting Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Potential pathway under resIdential

Groundwater 1 1 190.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC

Groundwater 3 3 27.0 - 39.1 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
\ groundwater for potable use.

Groundwater 2 3 ND -17.6 E300.0 reuse scenario if residenls access Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 7S Evatuation

Groundwater 2 3 ND - 160 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare (:enter 8 Evaluation
Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface 09Groundwater5 Research, Development. Test and

Groundwater 0 3 ND E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC

Navy! White Oak Surlace 09Groundwater7 Research, Developmenl, Test and

Navy! White Oak Surlace 09Groundwater8 Research, Development, Test and

Navy! White Oak Surlace 09GroundwaterB Research, Development, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare Center LD367 Evaluation
. Navy! White Oak Surface Research, Development, Test and

09PZ44 Groundwater 0 2 ND E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface Research, Development, Test and

09PZ55 Groundwater 0 3 ND E300.0 None Federal, Stale BRAC

Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface Research, Development, Test and
09PZ56 Groundwater 1 1 10.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
So~ contamination could leach 10

groundwater. Potential pathway
Navy! White Oak Surlace Research, Development, Test and
09SB3OO So~ 2 2 11.0 - 1,400.0 EPA 314 under residential reuse scenario if Federal; State BRAC
residents access groundwater for
potable use
Fie; PercData_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet· Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limij is 4 ppb Page 46 of 75
DOD PlfChlo~te au.".,

t,;:. &ervlce" Summar188 • EnYlronmental Restora~ •Cleanup, other "'; "-,'
Regulatory
Interest (Clearup
Location Number of Range of requesled.
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrstions Potential Pathway(s) of Exposun permitting Funding Type .
. sampling
requirements)
Son contamination may leach to

groundwater. Potential pathway
09SB301 son 2 2 15.0 - 40.0 EPA 314 under residential reuse scenario if Federal; State BRAC
residents access groundwater for
potable use.
Navy! While Oak Surface Research, Development, Test ard \

09SP201 Groundwater 0 1 ND E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Potential pathway urder residential

Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface Research, Dev8l0pment, Test ard
09SP202 Groundwater 1 1 12.6 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 09Surface Research, Development, Test ard

Surface Water 0 1 ND E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center Waterl06 Evaluation
Navy! While Oak Surface 09Surface Research, Development, Test ard

Surface Water 0 1 ND E3000 None Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center Water200 Evaluation
Navy! While Oak Surface 09Surface Research, Development, Test and

Surface Water 0 1 ND E300:0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! Whije Oak Surface 09Surface Research, Development, Tes! and

Waler202 Evaluation
Surface Water 0 1 ND E300.0 None Federal; Stale BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 09Surface Research, Development, Tes! and

Surface Water 0 1 ND E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! Whije Oak Surface 09Surface Research, De~e1opment, Test and

Surface Water 0 1 ND E3000 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface Research, DeVelopment, Test and

09TP303 Sol 0 1 ND EPA 314 None Federal, State BRAC
Navy! While oak Surface Research, Development, Test and

09TP~ Sol 0 2 ND EPA 314 None Federal; State BRAe

09TP319A Soil 0 1 ND EPA 314 None Federal, State BRAC

09TP319B Son 0 1 ND EPA 314 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface Research, DeVelopment, Test and

09TP376 Sol 0 1 ND EPA 314 None Federal, Stale BRAC
Navy! Whije Oak Surface 11 Groundwater1 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 3 ND E300.0 None Federal, Slate BRAC
Fie' PercData_AllSvcs_Majoil_
Sheet: Env Restoralion-Clearup, Other • Method 314 reporting limij is 4 ppb Page 47 0175
,,',
:'7-" .--,..-;'" . ~~
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
location Number of Range of requested.
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposun permitting , Funding Type
Equipment, Actlv/lles) Detections Method
(Media) Collected Detected (ppb) reqUirements.
sampling
requirements)
Navy! White Oak Surface llGroundwalerl Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 3 ND E300,0 None Federal: State BRAC
Potentiat pathway under residential

Navy! While Oak Surface llGroundwalerl Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 2 3 ND,8,5 E300,0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface llGroundwaterl Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 4 ND E300,O None Federal; State BRAC
Marine'Corps Warfare Center 04 Evaluation

Navy! While Oak Surface llGroundwalerl Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 1 4 ND - 6,3 E300,O reuse scenario if residents access Federat; State BRAC
Marine Corps War1are Center 05 Evaluation
Navy! While Oak Surface 11 Groundwaterl Research. Development, Test and

Marine Corps War1are Center 06 Evaluation
Navy! While Oak Surface l1Groundwaterl Research, Development. Test and

Groundwater 0 3 NO E300,0 None Federal; Siale BRAC

Navy! While Oak Surface l1Groundwaierl Research, Development. Test and
Groundwater 3 3 310-44,0 E3000 reuse scenario if residents access Federa.; State BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface l1Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 3 NO E300,O None Federal; State BRAC

Groundwater 3 3 38,0 - 46,9 E300,0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC

Navy! While Oak Surface 11 Groundwaterl Research, Development. Test and
Groundwater 1 4 ND - 58,S E300,O reuse scenario if residents access Federal; Stale BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface l1Gr~~ater2 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 2 4 ND-70 E300,O reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
groundwaler for polable use,

Navy! While Oak Surface 11Groundwater2 Research. Development, Test and
Groundwater 3 3 84,7 - 190,0 E3000 reuse scenario if residents access Federal, Siale BRAC

Navy! While Oak Surface llGroundwater2 Research. Development. Test and
Groundwater 2 3 NO - 110,0 E3000 reuse scenario if residents access Federal: Slate BRAC
Sheet. Env Restoration-Cleanup. Olher • Method 314 reporting limil is 4 ppb Page 48 of 75
>(,'t,.;,~;,
,:; J'~~;'i'
I)c)OPerehl9rateSurvey
.
i ·e" 8eMe:e_ 6u.,....:j, r:nVJron..... Re.-tc>ratIOn" t~. OfJIer
.
.;,
:>" .
:.,; •.. . . . ;
Regulatory
Interest (Cleamp
Location Numberot Reno. 01 requested,
SOurce 01 Perchlorete (Operetlons, Number 01 Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samplee Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) 01 Exposure permitting Funding Type
sampling
requirements)

Navy! While Oak Strlace 11Groundwaler2 Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 1 3 ND-7.0 E3OO.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
groundwater fot potable use.

Groundwater 0 4 NO E3oo.0 None Federal; Stale BRAe
Potential pathway under residenUai

Groundwater 2 3 NO - 9.0 E3OO.0 reuse scenario if residellls access Federal; Stale BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface l1Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwaler 0 3 NO E3OO.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 11Groundwaler2 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 3 NO E3OO.0 None Federal; State BRAC

Navy! While Oak Surface 11 Groundwater6 Research, DeveloPment, Test and
Groundwater 2 3 NO -14.0 E3OO.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC

Groundwater 1 3 NO - 5.0 E3oo.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC

Groundwater 0 3 NO E3OO0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 11 Groundwater6 Research, De~elopment, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare Center g Evaluation

Navy! White Oak Surface 11Groundwaler7 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwaler 0 5 NO E3oo.0 None Federal; Slate BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 1 ' ' Evaluation
Navy! White Oak Surface 11Groundwaler7 Research, Development, Tesl and

Groundwater 0 3 NO E3oo.0 None Federal, Slate BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 11Groundwater7 Research, Development, Tesl and

Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None Federal; Stale BRAC
Navy ! White Oak Surface 11 Groundwater8 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 4 NO E3OO.0 None Federal. Slate BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 11 Groundwater8 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 3 NO E3OO.0 None Federal: State BRAC
File: PercData.-AIISvcs_May6_

• Melhod 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 49 of 75
DoD Pet'Cblorete Su""y c
. '" , •,,>,':', .......~,!~~ v~...., ~,.n .... ~ - ""~'''.'VI"•••~''''- ~':~~~~!t - ~~""'~"Y~~ "- ',' F " , ",'
i",
Regulatory
Interest (CleallJll
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permilt,"!I Funding Type
Equipment, ActivitIes) Detections Method
sampling
requirements)

Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None Federal; Stale BRAG'
Marine Corps Warfare Genter 6 Evaluation
Navy I White Oak Surface 1tGroundwater6 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 4 NO E300,O None Federal; Slate BRAG
Navy! White Oak Surface

11 Groundwater6 Research, Development, Test and
8 Evaluation
Groundwater 0
. 4 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy I White Oak Surface Research, Development. Test and

11PZ62 Groundwater 0 4 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
,

11PZ64 Groundwater 1 3 NO - 6.0 E3000 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
Navy I Whne Oak Surface Research, Development, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare Center Evalualion
Navy! White Oak Surface Research, Development, Test and

46EW-1 Groundwater 0 3 NO EPA 314 None Federal; State BRAC
Marine C",ps Warfare Center Evaluation
Navy I White Oak Surface Research, Development, Test and


Navy! WhKe Oak Surface Research, De~elopment, Test and
46EW-3 Groundwater 3 3 4.6 - 7.2 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residentS access Federal; Stale BRAC

Marine Corps Warfare Center EvalUation
Navy! White Oak Surface ' ' Research, Development, Test and
Potential palhway under residential

Navy! White Oak Surface Research, Development, Test and
46EW~ Groundwater 3 3 7.4 - 66 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access Federal, State BRAC

Groundwater 0 2 NO E3000 None Federal; Slate BRAC
Navy ! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None Federal, Stale BRAC
F~e: PercData_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting IimK is 4 ppb Page 50 of 75
000 Perclllo~.,.Survey
8eIYf_ 81_ Su~ • Envlronl\1llli\t81 ~..toratlon - a.anup, Other
Regulatory
Interest (Clearup
Service FacUlty Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permilling Funding Type
Equipment, Activities) Deteetlons Method
sampting
requirements)
Polential palhway under residential

Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research, Development, Test and E300.0; EPA
Groundwater 3 8 NO' - 93 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 23 Evaluation 314
9roundwater for potable use.

Groundwater 3 5 NO' - 14.1 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
I groundwater for potable use.
Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research. Oevelopment, Test and

Groundwater 0 2 NO E3000 None Federal; State BRAC
Potential Pathway under residential

Groundwater 2 2 124 - 15.4 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC


Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None Federal; Slate BRAC

Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research, Oevelopment, Test and
Groundwater 1 2 NO-11.1 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; Slate BRAC

Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC

Navy ! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research, Oevelopment, Test and E300.0; EPA
Groundwater 9 16 NO' -12.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC

Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research, Oevelopment, Test and E300.0; EPA
Groundwater 3 15 NO' -5.1 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
'' groundwater for potable use.
Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research, Development. Test and


Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research, Oevelopment, Tesl and E300.0; EPA
Groundwater 5 15 NO' 15.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC

Groundwater 10 16 NO' -140 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
Fie: PercOata_AUSvcs_May6_
Sheet Env Restoration-Clearup, Other , Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 51 of 75
~D PetehlorBte Surver
RestoratlOn-Ci .. Other
,- " .:
Regulatory
Intefest (Cleanup
Sourca of Parchlorate (Operations, Number of Analytical
Service FacUlty Sit. Detected . Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposufe permitting Funding Type
Equipment, ACtivities) Delectlons Method
(Media) Collected Detected (ppb) requiremerns,
sampling
requirements)
Navy! WMe Oak Surface 46Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and E3oo.0; EPA
Groundwater 0 12 ND None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! WMe Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare Center ooD Evaluation
Navy! While Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and \

Marine Corps Warfare Center OOS Evaluation

Groundwaler 0 2 ND E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
.
Navy! Wh"e Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and



Groundwater 1 2 ND·9.3 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC

Navy! Whne Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, De~elopment, Test and

Groundwater 0 2 NO EJOO.O None Federal; State BRAC

Groundwater 1 3 ND·7.6 E3oo.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
. Marine Corps Warfare Center 06 Evaluation
,' Potential pathway under residential

Groundwater 2 2 9.9 - 10.1 E3000 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None Federal; Stale BRAC


groundwater for polable use.
Groundwater 0 2 NO E3OO0 None Federal; State BRAC

F~e: PercDala_AJISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Resloralion-Clea~,Other • Method 314 reporting lim" is 4 ppb Page 52 of 75
Survvy
RegulatoIY
Inlerest (Cleanup
Location Number of
Range of requested,
Source of Perchlorate (Operallons. Number of
Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples
Concentrations
Potential Pathway(sl of Exposure permitting Funding Type
Equipment, Acllvltiesl Detections
Method
(Medial Collected
Detected (ppbl
requirements,
sampling
requirements)

Marine Corps Warfare Cenler 13M Evaluation
Potenlial pathway under residential

Navy! WMe Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, DeVelopment, Test and
Groundwater 1 4 ND -12.5 E300.0 reuse scenario if resideols access Federal; Slate BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Cenler 13S Evaluation

Marine Corps Warfare Center 14D Evaluation

Navy! While Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development. Test and



Groundwater 1 2 ND-15.1 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; Stale BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research. Development. Test and


Navy! Whije Oak Surface 46Groundwaler2 Research. Development, Test and
Groundwater 2 2 25.4 - 354 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research. Development, Test and

Navy! Whije Oak Surface Research. Development. Test and

46SP206 Groundwater 0 2 ND E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Genter Evaluation
Navy! WMe Oak Surface 46Surface Research. Deve!opmeri, Test and

Surface Water 0 1 NO E300.0 None Federal; State BRAC
Navy! WMe Oak Surface 46Surface Research. Development, Test and

Surface Waler 1 2 ND-7.2 E300.0 No potential pathways known Federal; State BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Genter Water03 Evaluation
-
Navy! Whije Oak Surface 46Surface Research. Development, Test and
Surface Water 0 1 NO E300.0 None Federal, Stale BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Test and

Surface Water 1 1 76 E3000 No potential pathways known Federal; Stale BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Genter Water203 Evaluation
F ~e: PercData_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Olher • Method 314 reporting Iimij is 4 ppb Page 53 of 75
. ~ Pen:hlora~ Survey'., . •. . . .• ';:;'~J
:;~ $erVIct _ SUIMlllI't.. ~ ErivlR)~meQtafRes~QIi~ Cltan.,..; ()tMt -.
Regulatory
Interest (Oeanup
Service Facility Site Detected Sample. Concentrations Potential Pathway(sl of EJ<posurelpermilling . Funding Type
(Media) Collecled Delected (ppb) requirements,
sampling
requirements)
Navy I White Oak SOOace 46Suriace IResearch, Development, Test and

ISurface Water I 0 I 1 I NO I E3000 INone IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy I White Oak Surface 46Surface IResearch. Development, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare Center Waler205 Evaluation
ISurface Water I 1 I 1 I 8.5 I E300.0 I No potential pathways known IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy I White Oak Suriace

46Surface
Water207
I
Evaluation
ISurface Water I 1
\
I 1 I 73 I E300.0 I No potential pathways known IFederal; State I BRAC
Army Perchlorate.Survey· Envlronmllnlal Restoration. Cleanup. Other
Building 528
Future perm~
Ammunilion
EPA314 requirements for I
Army Fort Wingate Depot ActivitylNormal Munition Demil soil 29 31 NO - 3.18 ppm Soitlngestion BRAC
modified sampling and
Maintenance
cleanup
BUilding
Future perm~
Former TNT
EPA314 requirements for I
Army Fort Wingate Depot Activity IWashout Munition Demil soil 1 11 NO -0,10 ppm Soitlngestion BRAC
modified sampling and
Facililies
cleanup
Futtxe permil
Former TNT
12 47 requirements for I
Army Fort Wingate Depot ActivilylWashout Munition Demit Groundwater NO' -76.6ppb EPA 314.0 Water Ingestion BRAC
sampling and
Facililies
cleanup
Former TNT Future permit
W· I
.. Washout requirements for I
Army Fort Ingate Depot ActIVity Facilities and Munilion Demil Groundwater 2 2 2,440 - 2,890 EPA 314.0 Water Ingestion BRAC
sampling and
Building 528 cleanup
Former TNT ,
Future permil
Washout
requirements for I
Army Fort Wingate Depot ActivitylFacitilies and Munilion Demil Groundwater 2 17 NO' -9.4 ppb EPA 3140 Water Ingestion BRAC
sampling and
Buildings 542 I
cleanup
600
Former TNT
Future permit
Washout
requirements for I
Army Fort Wingate Depot ActivitylFacilities and Munition Demit Groundwater 0 16 NO' -100 ppb 314 Water Ingestion BRAC
sampling and
Adminstration
cleanup
Area
Former TNT
Washout Future perm~
Fort W· lOt A f itylFacilitieS and reqUirements for I
Army Inga e epo c IV Northern Munilion Demil Groundwater 0 8 NO 314 none BRAC
sampling and
Property cleanup
Boundary
Future permit
Sewage
requirements for I
Army Fort Wingate Depot ActivitylTreatment Munilion Demit Groundwater 0 2 NO 314 none BRAC
samplIng and
Facility
cleanup
File: PercOala_AnSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoralbn-Cleanup, Other ' Method 314 reporting limil is 4 ppb Page 54 of 75
. ," DoD Perchlorate (jurvey ". ' ,

{ . ~sn. S~ ~,~vlronmentalReJ~'·C~up,oiher\
Regulatory
I I I I 1
Interest (Cleanup
Location
Soufce of Pefchlofate (Operations.
Equipment. Activities) I Detected
(Media)
N b f Number of Range of
O::C:::s Semples Concentrations
. Collected Detecled (ppb)
A lyt" I
~':nh::::
requested.
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposufe per~ilting
feqUlfllments.
sampling
I Funding Type
reqwements)
FutlJ"e perm"
Army IFort Wingate Depot AetiV"YI~BI~
cos
Area- I Munition Demil
I Groundwater
I t
I
14
I
NO' - 10.0 ppb
I 314 IWat9f Ingestion
I requirements for I
sampling and
BRAC
cleanup
Future perm"
IFort Wingate Depot ActiVijyIOB/~ Area-
reqUirements fOf I
Army Mun"ion oem~ Groundwater 14 39 NO' - 15.0ppb 314 Wal9f Ingeslion BRAG
CUff sampling and
\
cleanup
SVAo-Q09-R-Q1
314.0/1.0
Army ISavanna Army Depot laid Bufning Open burn/open detonation Groundwat9f 1 11 4.7 ppb
ug/L
Ofinking Water I BRAC
Grounds
---
SVAO-Q50
3140/1.0
Army ISavanna Almy Depot IActive Open burnlopen detonation Groundwater 7 9 1.2 - 12.0 '
ug/L
Ofinking Water I BRAC
Demolilion Area
Sunllowel" Army Surface RCRA COfrective I

Army None Groundwat9f 0 1 NO E314.0/4ppb None BRAC
IAmmumion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 21 Action Perm"
Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective I

Army None Groundwater 0 1 NO E314.0/4ppb None BRAC
IAmmunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 21 Action Perm"
Sunllowel" Army Surface RCRA COfreclive I

Army None Groundwater 0 1 NO E314.0I4ppb None BRAC
'Ammumion Plant (SFAAP) Wat9fMU 27 Action Perm"
Sunflower Army Surface RCRA COffeclive I

lAmmun"ion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 27 Action Perm"
ISunflower Army I
Army
Surface
IAmmumion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU27
f-
INane
I
Groundwater
I 0
I 3
I NO E314 0/ 4PpblNone
IRCRA Corrective I
Action Perm"
BRAC
Sunflower Army Surface

RCRA Corrective,
'Ammumion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU39 Action Perm"
Sunflower Almy Surface RCRA Corrective I

!Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WalerMU 39 Action Perm"
Army
ISunflower Army Surface
None Groundwater 0 1 NO E314.0I4ppb None
RCRA Corrective I
BRAC
lAmmUnition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU39 Action Perm"
Army
None Groundwater 0 1 NO E3140/4ppb None
RCRA Corrective,
BRAC
!Ammumion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU39 Action Perm"
Army
None Groundwater 0 1 NO E3140/4ppb None
RCRA Corrective I
BRAG
IAmmumion Plant (SFAAPl Wat9fMU39 Action Perm"
Army
Sunflower Army Surface
IAmmumion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU39 I None
I Groundwater
I 0
I 1
I NO IE3140/4PPb1None
IRCRA Corrective I
Action Permit
BRAC
F~e. Percoata_AJISvcs_MaIti_
Sheet Em Restoratior>-Cleanup, Other ' Method 314 reporting lim" is 4 ppb Page 55 of 75
. :.:,:,,,' ,' ;; .':, ;

j '\:' ~~~~ .J;nvlro~R~!'1Itl&f·~i,lp.qther f;~· . ',::,:,<:1' . ,,:.~;. ;:b:"; .~ .;~~ ~,:i .~~ ';'
Reau'atory
Interest (Clearop
Source of Perchlorate (Operations. Number of
Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permilliog Funding Type
Equipment, Aclivltles) Deteclions
Method
(Media) Collected Detected (ppb)
requirements,
sampling
requirements)
Sunflower Army Surface RCRA COfT8Ctive

Army None Grourdwater 0
1 NO
E314.0/4ppt None BRAC'
Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 39 AcliOn Permn
Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective

Army None Grourdwaler 0
3 NO
E314.0/4ppb None BRAC
AmmundiOn Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 39 Action Permi
\
Army None Surface Water 0 3 NO
AmmuniliOn Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 39 Action Permi
Sunflower Army Surface RCRA CorrectiVe

Army None Grourdwater 0 1 NO
Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 47 Action Permn

Army None Groundwater 0 1 NO
E314.0I4ppb None BRAC
AmmunniOn Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 Action Permi

Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 Action Permd

Ammundion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 Action Permi

Ammundion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 Action Permi

E314.0I4ppb None BRAC
Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 Action Permn

Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WalerMU 66 AcliOn Permit

Army None Sed.iment 0 5 NO
Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 AcliOn Permi

Army None Surface Water 0 4 NO
Ammundion Plan! (SFAAPI WaterMU66 AcliOn Permd
Ammunilon
EPA 314/50
Army Umatma Chemical Depot Oemolnion Area OB/OO Groundwater 5 45 5-9.6 ppb
No Completed Pattr.vay Unknown BRAC
ppb
(ADA)
The Sow3ge outfaR is ultimately

fl0win9 to the Wright Patman Lake
nearby, which is one of two sources
of drinking water lor Texarkana and
Sandary sewer treated from RRAD and Investigation
Army Red Rivet' Army Depot X-1 Sewer Plant Grourdwater 1 31 6.8 ppb EPA 314.0 the surroundin9 communities. In BRAC
Lone Slar AAP required by Slate
March, 2003, the State and
installation sampled the lake area.
and is sediments and found no
detection
File: PercOala_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet· Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other

• Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 56 of 75
DoQ Perehlorate SUMY ,
" , , ".- '=. ' r' - --,
,-
.".
Regulatory
Interest (Clearup
Location Number of Range of requesled.
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(sl of Exposure pennitting Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Sanitary sewer treated from RRAO and Investigation

Army Red River Army Depot X-l Sewer Plam Surface Water 0 5 NO EPA 314.0 none BRAC
Lone Star AAP required by State
Sanitary sewer treated from RRAD and Investigation

Army Red River Army Depot X-l Sewer Plant Sediment 0 5 NO EPA314,0 none BRAC
Lone Star AAP required by State
East Burn No, 2,

Used for destroying obsolete, unserviceablE \ RCRA Corrective
Army Pueblo Chemical Depot Surface Groundwater 0 1 NO EPA 314.0 none BRAC
or excess conventional munitions, Action
WaterMU5
This area was used for incineration of

Complete pathway from exK to
North Burn Area munitions. chemical and hazardous wastes.
E314,O, RL = Chico Creek aquifer and into the RCRA Corrective
Army Pueblo Chemical Depot No, 1. Surface Propellants were placed in large pans and Groundwater 1 2 NO' - 9,3 ugtL BRAC
2,5 ugIL Arkansas alluvial aquifer where Action
WaterMU6 ignited, Pershing missile rocket motor
residences u1Rize groundwater,
static firings were conducted here,
This area was used for incineration of
North Burn Area

.munilions. chemical and hazardous wastes,
Army Pueblo Chemical Depot No, 2. Surface Propellants were placed in large pans and Groundwater 0/2 NO
E314,O, RL=none
RCRA Corrective
BRAC
2.5 ugtL Action
WaterMU 7 igniled, Pershing miss'e rocket motor
static ,..ings were conducted here.
TNT Wastloul
E314.0, RL Complete pathway from ed to
Facillyand Ammunition worksl1op area. Energetics
varies Chico Creek aqui!eLand into the RCRA Corrective
Army Pueblo Chernical Depot Discharge were reclaimed from munilions Pink water Groundwater 1 21 NO' - 180 ugtL BRAC
between 4.0 Arkansas aHuvial aquifer where ActiOn
System. Surface discharged to unlined lagoon.
and 8.0ugfl residences utilize groundwater.
WaterMU 17
E314.0. RL
East Lagoon, Served as the waste lagoon for collection of
varies RCRA Corrective
Army PueblO Chemical Depot Surface all industrial area wastes to include the Groundwater 0 3 NO none BRAC
between 100 Action
WaterMU 21 Missile Facility Building.
and 200ugtL
Pils South of the
Guided Missile
Oemolilion area potentially used for
Army Pueblo Chemical Depot WorkShop, destroying bombs by detonating them in Groundwater 0 1 NO
E314.0, RL=none
RCRA Corrective
BRAC
4.0 ugtL Action
Surflll;e, pils.
WaterMU 42
700 Series
Buildings.
Army Pueblo Chemical Depot Surface
Ammunnion renovation and maintenance
Groundwater 0 1 NO
E314.0. RL=none
RCRA Corrective
BRAC
buildings. 20 uglL Action
WaterMUs 53.
55 and 57
Concentrated
Red Fuming
Army Pueblo Chemical Depot
Nilric Acid
Uncertain Groundwater 0 1 NO
E314.0. RL=none
RCRA Corrective
BRAC
Disposal Area, 20 ugtL Action
Surface
WaterMU 20
File: PercOata_AIlSvcs_May6_
SMa\: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other , Method 3t4 reporting Umit is 4 ppb Page 57 of 75
'. DoD PIRhlorale ~rwy

_. ~.! ,-- ~- ... -,~.
Regulatory
Interest (Clear>.Jp
Location Numborof Range of requested,
Source of Perchlorate (Operations, Numberilf Analytical
Service Facility Sile Detected Samplos Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
(Media) Collected Detected Ippbl requirements,
sampling
requirements)
Sampling
conducted by the
Operational Army
Jefferson Proving Ground
Ranges - Impact Environmental
Army (Operational Range Operations SL 36 160 .027 - .11 mglkg EPA 314 No known pathways ER,A(BRAC)
and boundary Center as part of
sampling)
areas the Range
Assessment
, Program
Sampling
conducted by the
Operational Army
Ranges - Impact Environmental
Army (Operational Range Operations Surface Water 1 22 0.87 ppb' EPA 314 No known pathways ERA (BRAC)
and boundary Center as part of
sampling)
areas the Range
Assessment
Program
Sampling
conducled by the
Operational Army
Ranges - Impact EPA 314 Environmental
Army (Operational Range Operations sediment 0 22 NO No known pathways ER,A(BRAC)
and boundary modified Center as part of
sampling)
areas lheRange
Assessment
Program
Sampling
conducted by the
Operational Army
Ranges - Impact EPA 314 Environmental
Army (Operational Range
sampling)
and boLndary
areas
Operations
. Groundwater 0 14 NO
modifl8d
No known pathways
Cenler as part of
the Range
ER.A(BRAC)
Assessment
Program
Sampling
conducted by the
Operational Army
FI Polk (Operational Range Rangl/s.- Impact EPA 314 Environmental
Operations SL 0 97 NO No known pathways OMA
sampling) and boundary mod~ied Center as part of
areas the Range
Assessment
Armv Program
Ja... ~ "'\I
Ft Polk (Operational Range Ranges - Impact EPA 314 conducted by the
Operations Surface Water 0 17 NO No known pathways OMA
sampling) and boundary modifl8d Army
Armv ~
,a..... ''\I
Fl Polk (Operational Range Ranges - Impact EPA 314 conducted by the
Operations Sediment 0 17 NO No known pathways OMA
sampling) and boundary modifIed Army
Armv
Fie: PercData_AlISvcs_Mayfl_
S'-t: Env Restoration-Clear>.Jp, Other • Method 314 reporting Iimij is 4 ppb Page 58 of 75
:., {~~,:~i;>" ,",'; . Servl~ .,... 8+t~r1". Envln)';mei'ltal R"~raIkiil' ¢I,.~p; ~. ,. ;' ~-: ~, >- > ~
~t~:' :.r;", .': ',rj,E <,tL
Regulatory
Interest (Clearvp
Location NlImberof Range of requested,
Source of Perchlorate (OperaUons, Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(a) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
Equipment. Activltlesl Detections Method
sampling
requirements)
Sampling
conducted by the
Operalional Army
Ft Bliss (Operational RangE Ranges - Impact EPA 314 Environmental
Operations SL 0 259 NO No known pathways OMA
sampling) and boundary modifoed Center as part of
areas the Range
Assessment
\
Armv Program
Sampling
conducted by the
Operational Army
FI Bliss (Operational Range Ranges - Impact EPA314 Environmental
Operalions Sediment 0 29 NO No known pathways OMA
sampling) and boundary modifoed Center as part 01
areas the Range
Assessment
Armv Program
Sampling
conducled by the
Operational Army
Fl Bliss (Operational RangE Ranges - Impact EPA 314 Environmental
OperationS Groundwater 0 8 NO No known pathways OMA
sampling) and boundary modifoed Center as part of
areas the Range
Assessment
Armv Program
CPBO-OO1-R~1 Sampling and

Army Camp Bonneville OBloo Groundwater 6 24 5-214 ug/L 314 modified Potential drinking water BRAC
Demo1/LF4 Clearop
Sampling
requirements
Ste 39 - Multi- Range Operations - use of percliorate EPA 314120 (suspected
Army Fort Ord (BRAC) soil 41 432 13-1061'9Ikg No known pathway BRAC
Range Area containing munttions for training purposes, 2060 I'g/kg contaminant in
range areas due
to historical use),
Sampling
, '
Stte 39 - Range requirements by
Army EPA 314151
Fort Ord (BRAC) Conducting OB/OO operations, soU 0 10 No delections, none California EPA for BRAC
36A 611'g/kg
RCRAciean
closure of stte
Stte 29 Former
Longhorn Army 300.0 & Regulatory
Army TNT Production Operations Groundwater 23 72 1·88000 ppb' Groundwater incomplete BRAC
Ammunition Plant 314.0/4 requesl
Area
SUe 29 Former
Longhorn Army 300.0 & Regulalory
Army TNT Production Operations Soil 13 56 24-2410 ppb No known pathway BRAC
Ammunition Plant 314.0/40 request
Area
Longhorn Army Sne 35 Sumps 300.0 & Regulatory
Army Operations Groundwater 54 190 1-82900 ppb' Groundwater incomplete BRAC
Ammunition Plant (Various) 314.014 request
F~e: PercOala_AIISvcs_May6_
Sr-t: Env Restoration-C1earvp, Other , Method 314 reporting limtt is 4 ppb Page 59 of 75
DoDP, IorateS'
'C: "",. _ . ~ ..~ ;l;IUmmanea· cnVlrvn"!8fl'll1 K~ • "..-nup, UUler. ,:t,1 : "::':' ' ;; .... - :
,. ":f"·· ~ -f:~\; • L,
Regulatory
Interest (Clea~p
Location Number of Renseof requested, .
Source of Perchlorate (Operallons, Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permilliltg Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Longhorn Army Site 35 Sumps 300.0& Regulatory

Army Operations Soil 17 106 20-1450 ppb No known pattNvay BRAC
Ammurnion Plant (Various) 314.0/40 request
S~e 50 Former
Army Waste Disposal Operations Groundwater 15 34 2-150000 ppb. Groundwater incomplete BRAC
Ammurnion Plant 314.0/4 request
Facif~
S~e 50 Former \
Army _ Waste Disposal Operations Soil 6 14 15-45600 ppb No known pathway BRAC
Ammunition Plant 314.0/40 request
Facil~y
Longhorn Army 3000& Regulatory

Army Perimeter WeBs Operations Surface Water 0 6 ND none request
BRAC
Ammurnion Plant 314.0/4.40
Site 35,
Longhorn Army Regulatory
Army Gooseberry Operations Surface Water 44 110 1-59 ppb 3000/4 Surface Water to Caddo Lake BRAC
Ammunilion Plant request
Creek
Longhorn Army S~e 18-24, Regulatory

Army Operations Surface Waler 22 105 6-905 ppb 300.0/4 Surface Water to Caddo Lake BRAC
AmmUnition Plant Harrision Bayou request
Various r..ing
ranges and
impact areas.
Includes parcels:
Analyses
73Q-X, 87Q-X,
performed attha
91Q-X, 114Q-X, EPA Method
request of
115Q,116Q-X, 314.0; Soil
Possible contamination from weapons firing regulatory
Fort McClellan, Calhoun 117Q-X, 135Q MRL-40to
Army and impacts during historical training SurfaceSoQ 2 182 10 & 32 ppb· possible ingestion agencies (EPA BRAC
County, Alabama X, 138Q-X, 1390 68ppband
activities. and ADEM)
X, 140Q-X, 141Q sediment 90
X,142Q·X,
, ppb
during s~e
investigation
151Q, 181(7).
phase.
194(7), 2000,
201Q,2210-X,
228€!, 229Q-X,
2310, 232Q-X.
.'
F~e: PercData_AnSvcs_May6_
Sheet· Em Restoratior>-Clea~p,Other • Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 60 of 75
, ,1< : ,,\ ;. ·:~DmJI)~"~i~run~I~~~~up.~",

... ,':: .\ /c
\" . . "1> '" {, •.. :'';': ..: ' . . ,;
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
:
Service Facility Site Detected SlImples Concentrallons Potentia' Pathway(s) of Exposure permMing Funding Type
Equipment, Acllvltles) Detections Method
(Media) Collected Delected (ppb) requirements,
sampling
requirements)
/
Various foring
,
ranges and
impact areas.
Includes parcels:
730-X, 870-X, Analyses
performed at Itle
910-X. 1140-X, \ EPA Method
request of
1150. 1160-X, 314.0; Soil
Possible contamination from weapons foring regulatory
Fort McClellan, Calhoun 117Q-X, 1350 MRL-40to
Army and impacts during historical training Subsurface so~ 0 162 NO none agencies (EPA BRAC
County, Alabama X, 138Q-X, 1390 68 ppb and
activ~ies. • and AOEM)
X, 1400-X, 141C sediment 90
X,142Q-X,
during s~e
ppb
investigation
1510, 181(7),
194(7), 2000, phase.
2010, 2210-X,
2280. 229Q-X,
2310, 2320-X.
Various firing
ranges and
impact areas
Includes parcels:
Analyses
730-X, 870-X,
91Q-X, 114Q-X, performed al the
request of
1150, 116Q-X,
Possible contamination from weapons firing EPA 314.0 regulatory
Fort McClellan, Calhoun n70-X, 1350
Army and impacts during historical training Groundwater 4 38 1.2 - 2.55 ppb' (MRL - 5-4 Possible water ingestion agencies (EPA BRAC
County, Alabama X, 138Q-X. 139C
X, 1400-X, 141C
X,1420-X,
activ~ies.
. ppb) and ADEM)
during s~e
investigation
1510, 181(7),
phase
194(7). 2000,
2010, 221Q-X,
2280. 229Q-X,
2310. 232Q-X.
, .
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other , Method 314 repor1ing lim~ is 4 ppb Page 61 of 75
lo
DoO Perchlo\1lt8 JJurvey
",,"," ,~
-", ~."," .-y-"- ~IJC''' ~ ,.----- ;;i- " <'
Regulatory
Interest (Clearup
LocaUon Number of Range of requested.
Source of Perchlorate (Operations. Numbsrof Analytical
(Media) Collected Detec1ed (ppbl requirements.
sampling
requirements)
Various firing
ranges and
impact areas,
Includes parcels:
73Q-X, 87Q-X. Analyses
91Q-X. 114Q-X, per10rmed althe
I request 01
115Q, 116Q-X.
Possible contamination Irom weapons firing EPA 314,0 regulatory
Fort McClellan. Calhoun 117Q.X, 1350
Army and impacts during hislorical training Surface Water 1 41 2.66 ppb' (MRL - 5- 4 Possible water ingeslion agencies (EPA BRAC
County, Alabama X. 138Q-X. 1390
activities. • ppb) and ADEM)
X. 140Q·X, 141C
X.142Q-X. during site
151Q. 181(7). investi9ation
194(7). 2000, phase,
201Q, 221Q-X.
228Q. 229Q-X,
231Q, 232Q·X,
RVAAP·16 Fuze Initial sampling 01

Ravenna Army Ammunition EPA 3140 Dermal - Training by National Guarc perchlorates at
Army and Boosler OBIOo 01 Military Munitions Surface Water 2 10 7 and 25 ppb BRAC
Plant MRL 1 ppb (Incidental Exposure) RVAAP reuesled
Quarry Ponds
by Ohio EPA
Initial sampling of
Ravenna Army Ammunition RVAAP-44 Load EPA 314,0 perchlorates at
Army Munitions LAP Facility Groundwater 0 10 NO none BRAC
Plant line 11 MRl4ppb RVAAP reuested
by Ohio EPA
WesVSoulhlEast None known - besides solt State developing IMAI Surface

Army Fort Huachuca OBIOo soi 67 242 27.000 ppb (max) EPA 314,0
Range ingestion, inhalation an action level WaterRO
State using
Caney Lake as
Emergency Feed
water lor other
314,01 MRL 4 IMAI Surface
Army Red River Army Depot OBOD Open Burn and detonation activities Groundwater 0 198 NO none lakes, State has
15 ppb WaterRO
sampled with the
Army and lound
no Perchlorate in
lake.
SMel: Env Restoralion-Clearup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 62 of 75
DoD Perc:hlora18 Survey
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Location Numbarof Range of requested.
Service Facility Sile Datected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permilling Funding Type
Equipment, Activities) Delectlons Methocl
sampling
requirements)
Slate using
Caney Lake as
Emergency Feed
Discharge to public drinking water water for other
Army Red River Army Depot 00 Open detonation activijy Stormwater 26 26 417 ppb max IMNSurface
EPA 314.0 source-Several m~es to Caney lakes. Slate has
WaterRO
lake sampled with the
\
Army and found
no Perchlorate in
lake.
Discharge to public drinking water Caney lake as

Army Red River Army Depot OB 1 &2 Open Burn activijy Slormwater 11 26 551071 ppb IMN Surtace
EPA314.0 source-Several miles to Caney Emergency Feed
WalerRO
Lake water for other
~.
»,n" U~'''\l
Discharge to public drinking water Caney Lake as
Army Red River Army Depot X-1 SaMary Sewer Plant Groundwater 1 IMN Surface
14 6.8 ppb max 314 source-Several m~es to Caney Emergency Feed
WaterRO
lake water for other
~
State using
Caney lake as
Emergency Feed
water for oIher
Red River Army Depot X-1 Sanijary Sewer Plan! Sedimant 0 NO !MN Surtace
Army 5 EPA 314.0 none lakes. Slate has
WaterRO
sampled wijh the
Army and found
. no Perchlorate in
lake.
State using
Caney lake as
Emergency Feed
water for other
Runoflto Surtace Water to Caney IMN Surface
Army Red River Army Depot Jt;-1 Sanijary Sewer Plant Soil 2 51 226 ppb EPA 314.0 lakes. State has
Lake several miles away WalerRO
sampled wijh the
Army and found
no Perchlorate in
lake.
State has verbally

Camp Bullis Training Sije OBIOD, MW1 OBOD IMN Surface
Army Groundwater 3 unavailable 15.2 - 22 ppb EPA 314 Several miles to Water Supply Well requested to
WaierRO
sample.
State has verbaUy

Camp BuUis Training Sije OB/OD. MW2 OBOD Groundwater IMNSurface
Army 3 unava~ble 2.33 - 4.91 ppb' EPA 314 Several miles to Water Supply wen requested to
WaterRO
sample.
Sheet. Env Restoralion-Clearup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 63 of 75
000 Pen:hlorate SulV8Y
Service Site Summaries· Environmental Restoration· Cleanup, Other
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Source of Perchlorate (Operations. Number 01 Analytical
sampling
requirements)
State has verbally

IMAI Surface
Army Camp Bullis TrainingCSne OB/OD, MW7 OBOD Groundwater 2 unavailable 6,4 - 9.3 ppb EPA 314 Several miles to Water Supply Wen requested to
WaterRO
sample.
State has verbally

IMAI Surface
Army Cllmp Bullis Training SlIe OB/OD. W2 OBOD Groundwater 3 unavailable 3 18 - 345 ppb' EPA 3140 Several miles to Water Supply Well requested 10
WaterRO
\ sample.
State has verbally

IMAI Surface
Army Camp Bullis Training Site OBIOD,W3 OBOD Groundwater 2 unavailable ,2.55 - 4.48 ppb' EPA 314.0 Several m~es to Water Supply We/I reql;asted to
WaterRO
sample.
State will include

Perchlorate a!
McAlester Army IMAI Surface
Army Rocket Lake Potential source - OBIOD Surface Water 0 26 NO EPA314 none Permll renewal
Ammunllion Plant WaterRO
(negotiations on
gOIng).
5 monlloring Not required

wells, (sampling
Army Uma~la Chemical Depot activrties Groundwater 5 5 5.0 -96 EPA 314 No exposure pathway known IMA
informationm conducted in
unavailable 1990's)
Not required
39 monitoring
(sampling
Army Umatma Chemical Depot wells, informalion activllies Groundwater 0 39 ND EPA 314 none IMA
conducted in
unava~able
1990's)
NJDEP and EPA
1421PICA 111 perchlorate production, disposal and 5 (including drinkibng water welts wllhin 1/4 moo want addrtonal
Army Picatinny Arsenal Groundwater 11 26 - 616 ppb' EPA 314 IMAINERO
(RI concept sile) research related activllies duplicate) of plume sampling for IRP
, investigation
NJDEP and EPA
142/PICA 111 perchlorate production, disposal and 21 (incl drinking water wells wllhin 1/4 m~e want additonal
Army Picalinny Arsenal soil 2 up to SOO ppb EPA 314 IMAINERO
(RI concepl slle) research related activities dups) of plume sampling for IRP
investigation
100
(including
PICA 002
perchlorate production, dIsposal and dups for NJDEP, EPA,
Army Picatinny Arsenal (Southern
research activllies
Groundwater 0
quarterly
ND EPA 314 none Developer
IMAINERO
Boundary welts)
sampling
program
polential pathway tlYough bedrock
Open Detonation to neighboring township where
Army Picatinny Arsenal Disposal and detonation activities Groundwater 13 42 up to 20 ppb EPA314 NJDEP. RCRA IMAINERO
Area perchlorate has been detected at <
1 ppb
DiSposal and
NJDEP required
Army Fort Dix delonation OB/OD Groundwater 1 4 ND - 28 ppb' EPA 314 No potential pathways known IMAINERO
sampling
activllies
Sheet. Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other

, Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 64 of 75

CREW: Department of Defense: Department of The Air Force: Regarding Perchlorate: Scanned Perchlorate October 2008 E

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CREW: Department of Defense: Department of The Air Force: Regarding Perchlorate: Scanned Perchlorate October 2008 E

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

/'

" sa..phd. were State lIIld

:Fede'at Agencies Involved?

broughl it up, but I

.has not yet I

DNR; POC David WiUiams 913­ ,propellant was used at this

Izamarripa 573­ Ihas solid evidence lo

1751-3107 I lsupport our contentions.

iCAMP GRAFTON ! USA I iOevilS Latl:e 'NO i JUSA

CAMP GRAYlING ~EUlIER USA I

jGraylin9 IMI i USA I.

'CAMP tWlnNGS I USA

'CAMP JOft/ll.SEVJEfl USA

!CAMPMAIIRY !USA USA

C8mp _ ..... "-T...-..ng

No No No No No INo iNo INO

f.=... .... ...._.

CANPPERRY USA PortOinton IOH USA ICONUS+

already I :reques~ I and Federal

No No no NA This has never been a

Yes Between 6-12 IYes USEPA;Trm

CAflLlSlE 8ARRACl<S ]USA Carlisle IPA [USA ICONUS'

No INo INo No No INO

INO INO Ni>

I \Did not lI1ink lI1ere was a

2I912001 1Other )NNV joakdale

USA Granite City IlL USA CONuS.

.ampllnglfnol If notalready !analysls IlnfOrmalion Iaware of State IFederal Agencies Involved? I

already Irequesled Iand Federal

CA957172462700 AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DERA Yes Not detected

CA99799F522900 EDWARDS FORMERLY DERA Yes Detected in soil (max

FFID Installation Component Program Sampled Detected Comments

CA957002474300 MATHERAFB AIR FORCE BRAC Mather AFB was a

CA957002434500 NORTONAFB AIR FORCE BRAC The former Norton AFB

CA99799F596000 NWSSEAL' FORMERLY DERA Yes Awaiting Results

CA917002464000 SAN NICOLAS NAVY DERA Yes Groundwater 16 ppb

3 Consulting Support (Database Linkage, Web Server Programming)

2 MODE-OF-ACTION TESTING STRATEGY

January 16, 2002 3-1 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

January 16,2002 3-2 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

9 3.1.2 Laboratory Animal Studies

January 16, .2002 3-3 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

January 16, 2002 3-4 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

January 16,2002 3-5 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

January 16,2002 3-6 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

January 16, 2002 3-7 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

3.2 IODINE METABOLISM AND THYROID PHYSIOLOGY

January 16, 2002 3-8 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

January 16, ,2002 3-9 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

Figure 3-1. Schematic representation of thyroid hormone biosynthesis and secretion in a

January 16,2002 3-10 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

January 16,2002 3-11 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

Figure 3-2. Schematic of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis and feedback

January 16,2002 3-12 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

January ]6,2002 3-13 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

THYROID STRUCTURE AND T3, T4, AND TSH HORMONES

(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998a)

Parameter Human Rat

T3 Half-life I Day 0.25 Day

TSH I x 6 to 60 x that in humans

Serum TSH Ma=F" M:s: 2 xF

Perchlorate (Cl0 4-): Iodide (1-):

January 16,2002 DRAFT-DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE

DNR; POC David WiUiams 913 ,propellant was used at this

Izamarripa 573 Ihas solid evidence lo