Report On Hillsborough County Mobility Fees

Board of County Commissioners
Agenda
Mobility Fee Workshop
March 9, 2016
1:30 3:00 p.m.
I.
Call to Order
Lesley Les Miller, Chair, BOCC
II.
Introduction
Michael S. Merrill, County Administrator
III.
Mobility Fee Program Update
Lucia E. Garsys, Chief Administrator

Development and Infrastructure Services
IV.
Job Creation and Redevelopment

Incentives
Ron Barton, Assistant County

Administrator, Economic Prosperity
IV.
Buyback of Credits
Bonnie Wise, Chief Financial

Administrator
V.
Board Discussion
VI.
Adjourn
Lesley Les Miller, Chair, BOCC
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY
MOBILITY FEES
Presented to

March 09, 2016
Concurrency
Impact
Fees
Mobility Fees
Cost to
add
Transportation
Capacity
Capacity
Consumed
by
New
Development
Non-Mobility
Fee
Revenue
from
Future
Development
Local roadway improvements

Bruce B. Downs
Segments A through D
Columbus Dr. Ext

(US 301 to Falkenburg Rd)
Madison Ave.
(US 41 to 78th St.)
Gunn Hwy.
(Ehrlich Rd to S. Mobley Rd)
Bell Shoals Rd.

(Bloomingdale Ave to Boyette Rd)
Race Track Rd
Phases I through IV
Boyette Rd
Phases II and III
Gornto Lake Rd Ext.

(Brandon Town Center to SR 60)
Turkey Creek Rd.

(MLK Jr. Blvd to Sydney Rd)
Trip Generation Rate = Number per day

Trip Length = Travel A to B
% New Trips = Accounts for trips already on the roadway
Interstate/Toll Discount = Accounts for interstate & toll trips
(not charged)
Sales Tax
$654,472
$28,700
$15,518
$294,550
$236,965
$44,406
$541,243
$741,960
Typical projects
$70,535
$360,444
Impact Fees
Year
2015
collection
Signalization @cash
1.25M
per
intersection
Intersection Improvements
@ $3M per intersection
Sidewalks @ $50 per LF
Mobility Fee will be spent on capacity projects that are

identified in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
in each Benefit District within 10 years
mobility fee schedule selected land uses

No New Sales Tax
Urban
Full schedule provided, and available online

Draft as of March 04, 2016
Rural
With New Sales Tax
Urban
Rural
$6,442
$9,295
$4,968
$7,821
$4,086
$5,909
$3,128
$4,951
$9,083
$13,136
$6,946
$10,999
$10,242
$12,269
$7,479
$9,506
$21,582
$25,846
$15,816
$20,080
$71,802
$86,174
$51,682
$66,054
mobility fee schedule residential land uses

No new Sales Tax
Urban
Rural
Sales Tax
Urban
Rural
Transferability of Existing Impact Fee Credits

Impact Fee
Assessment
Zone
Existing Impact Mobility

Fee Zone
District #1
Mobility
District #2
Mobility
District #3
Mobility
Mobility
District #4 District #5
Zone 1
Yes
Yes
Zone 2
Yes
Yes
Zone 3
Yes
Yes
Zone 4
Yes
Yes
Zone 5
Yes
Yes
Zone 6
Yes
Yes
Zone 7
Yes
Yes
Yes
Zone 8
Yes
Yes
Yes
Zone 9
Yes
Yes
Zone 10
Yes
Yes
Population
Growth
Residential
Revenue
Total
Revenue
BEBR MediumLevel Projections

Year 2045
Person-per-household used to
convert to units
Distribution of recent permits
Res/non-res based on 5yr impact
fee collection
Impact fee offsets
DRIs
DAs
Proportionate Share
Equity adjustment
- Eligibility
- Offset Amounts
DRAFT
Mobility Fee Schedule
This appendix presents the detailed fee calculations for each land use in the Hillsborough
County mobility fee schedule. The differentiation of input variables is presented below:
Table D-1 Urban Area Mobility Fee; does NOT include additional percent sales tax
revenue credit
Table D-2 Rural Area Mobility Fee; does NOT include additional percent sales tax
revenue credit
Table D-3 Urban Area Mobility Fee; includes additional sales tax revenues credit
Table D-4 Rural Area Mobility Fee; includes additional sales tax revenue credit
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
D-1
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table D1
Mobility Fee Schedule Urban Area; No Sales Tax
Gasoline Tax
$$ per gallon to capital:
Facility life (years):
Interest rate:
ITE LUC
Land Use
$0.206
25
2.50%
Unit
County Revenues:
State Revenues:
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Unit Cost per Lane Mile:

Average PMC per Lane Mile:
Fuel Efficiency:
Effectivedays per year:
$0.087
$0.119
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
$4,962,000
12,350
18.18 mpg
365
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
Interstate/Toll Facility Adjustment Factor:

Cost per PMC:
12,350
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
36.6%
$401.78
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RESIDENTIAL:
210
Single Family (Detached) - Less than 1,500 sf &

Annual HH Income less than 50% SHIP Definition
du
2.62
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
5.50
1.30
7.15
$2,872
$39
$719
$2,153
$1,792
20%

Annual HH Income between 50-80% SHIP Definition
du
3.96
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
8.31
1.30
10.80
$4,341
$58
$1,069
$3,272
$1,792
83%
6.11
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
12.82
1.30
16.67
$6,697
$90
$1,658
$5,039
$1,792
181%
7.81
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
16.39
1.30
21.31
$8,561
$115
$2,119
$6,442
$1,792
260%
8.76
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
18.38
1.30
23.89
$9,602
$129
$2,377
$7,225
$1,792
303%
2.38
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.85
1.30
5.01
$2,010
$28
$516
$1,494
$1,242
20%
3.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
5.82
1.30
7.57
$3,040
$42
$774
$2,266
$1,242
83%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
10.67
1.30
13.87
$5,573
$76
$1,400
$4,173
$1,242
236%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
2.41
1.30
3.13
$1,258
$17
$313
$945
$1,242
-24%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.64
1.30
4.73
$1,900
$26
$479
$1,421
$1,242
15%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
6.69
1.30
8.70
$3,496
$48
$884
$2,612
$1,242
110%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
9.31
1.30
12.10
$4,864
$67
$1,234
$3,630
$1,097
231%
100%
n/a
6.76
1.30
8.79
$3,530
$48
$884
$2,646
$1,097
141%
Single Family (Detached) - Less than 1,500 sf

Single Family (Detached) - 1,501 to 2,499 sf
Single Family (Detached) - 2,500 sf and greater
Multi-Family (Apartment); 1-2 Stories - Annual HH
Income less than 50% SHIP Definition
220
222/
223

Income between 50-80% SHIP Definition
du
du
du
du
Multi-Family (Apartment); 1-2 Stories
du
6.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
Multi-Family (Apartment); 3+ Stories - Annual HH

du
1.49
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
2.25
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
4.14
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
5.76
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

Multi-Family (Apartment); 3+ Stories
230
du
Residential Condominium/Townhouse
du
du
du
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
ITE 9th Edition
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
4.17
FL Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
100%
n/a
6.08
1.30
7.90
$3,176
$44
$811
$2,365
$901
163%
du
2.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.08
3.58
Same as LUC 210
72%
FL Studies
1.58
1.30
2.05
$826
$12
$221
$605
n/a
n/a
232
High-Rise Condominium; 3+ Stories
du
4.18
240
Mobile Home Park
du
253
Congregate Care Facility

LODGING:
310
Hotel
room
6.36
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
6.26
6.76
FL Studies
66%
FL Studies
8.33
1.30
10.83
$4,351
$59
$1,087
$3,264
$1,546
111%
311
Hotel; All Suites
room
4.90
ITE 9th Edition
6.26
6.76
Same as LUC 310
66%
Same as LUC 310
6.42
1.30
8.35
$3,352
$45
$829
$2,523
$1,082
133%
320
Motel
RECREATION:
room
5.63
ITE 9th Edition
4.34
4.84
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
5.96
1.30
7.75
$3,115
$43
$792
$2,323
$1,579
47%
412
General Recreation
acre
2.28
ITE 9th Edition
5.11
5.61
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.32
1.30
4.32
$1,736
$24
$442
$1,294
n/a
n/a
1.62
ITE 9th Edition

(Adjusted)
100%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.36
1.30
3.07
$1,234
$17
$313
$921
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
5.59
1.30
7.27
$2,920
$39
$719
$2,201
n/a
n/a
416
420
RV Park
(3)
Marina
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
site
boat berth
2.96
ITE 9th Edition
4.60
6.62
5.10
7.12
Same as LUC 240

Same as LUC 210
D-2
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table D1 (Continued)
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RECREATION:
430
Golf Course
hole
35.74
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
67.50
1.30
87.75
$35,257
$474
$8,733
$26,524
$4,272
521%
2.22
2.72
FL Studies
88%
FL Studies
66.04
1.30
85.85
$34,491
$528
$9,728
$24,763
$9,164
170%
444
Movie Theater
screen
106.63
Blend ITE 6th & FL

Studies
492
Health Club
INSTITUTIONS:
1,000 sf
32.93
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
94%
FL Studies
50.53
1.30
65.69
$26,395
$362
$6,670
$19,725
n/a
n/a
520
Elementary School (Private)
student
1.29
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
80%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.41
1.30
1.83
$735
$10
$184
$551
$61
803%
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.99
1.30
2.59
$1,038
$14
$258
$780
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.10
1.30
2.73
$1,096
$15
$276
$820
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.78
1.30
4.91
$1,973
$27
$497
$1,476
n/a
n/a
522
Middle School (Private)
student
1.62
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
530
High School (Private)
student
1.71
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
540
University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students)

(Private)
550
University/Junior College (more than 7,500 students)

(Private)
560
565
610
Church
1,000 sf
Hospital
Nursing Home
630
Clinic
OFFICE:
General Office 50,000 sq ft or less
1,000 sf
(4)
(4)
General Office 50,001-100,000 sq ft

710
student
1,000 sf
Day Care Center
620
student
2.00
1.50
ITE Regression Analysis

6.62
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.83
1.30
3.68
$1,480
$20
$368
$1,112
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
10.14
1.30
13.18
$5,294
$75
$1,382
$3,912
$544
619%
73%
FL Studies
33.77
1.30
43.90
$17,637
$275
$5,067
$12,570
$1,500
738%
21.36
1.30
27.77
$11,158
$150
$2,764
$8,394
unit change
n/a
9.11
ITE 9th Edition
3.90
4.40
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
71.88
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.03
2.53
FL Studies
13.22
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
77%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.59
3.09
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
2.02
1.30
2.63
$1,053
$16
$295
$758
$194
291%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
93%
FL Studies
49.95
1.30
64.94
$26,088
$358
$6,596
$19,492
$1,880
937%
bed
2.76
1,000 sf
33.22
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
Blend ITE 9th & FL
Studies
1,000 sf
15.50
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
23.28
1.30
30.26
$12,160
$167
$3,077
$9,083
$3,728
144%
1,000 sf
13.13
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
19.72
1.30
25.64
$10,300
$141
$2,598
$7,702
$2,300
235%
(4)
1,000 sf
11.12
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
16.70
1.30
21.71
$8,724
$120
$2,211
$6,513
$1,958
233%
(4)
1,000 sf
9.41
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
14.13
1.30
18.37
$7,382
$101
$1,861
$5,521
$1,958
182%
General Office greater that 400,000 sq ft
1,000 sf
8.54
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
12.83
1.30
16.68
$6,700
$92
$1,695
$5,005
$1,958
156%
715
Single Tenant Office Building
1,000 sf
11.65
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
17.50
1.30
22.75
$9,139
$125
$2,303
$6,836
$2,005
241%
720
Medical Office 10,000 sq ft or less
1,000 sf
23.83
FL Studies
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
37.31
1.30
48.50
$19,489
$265
$4,882
$14,607
$6,262
133%
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
54.37
1.30
70.68
$28,396
$387
$7,130
$21,266
$6,262
240%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
25.90
1.30
33.67
$13,530
$204
$3,759
$9,771
$2,807
248%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
29.18
1.30
37.93
$15,240
$230
$4,238
$11,002
$3,384
225%
(4)
720
Medical Office greater than 10,000 sq ft

RETAIL:
1,000 sf
34.72
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
813
Discount Superstore
1,000 sf
50.82
ITE 9th Edition
815
Discount Store; Free-Standing
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
57.24
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
D-3
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RETAIL:
Shopping Center 50,000 sq ft or less
820
(4)
Shopping Center 50,001-200,000 sq ft
(4)
(4)
Shopping Center greater than 400,000 sq ft

841
(4)
New/Used Auto Sales
1,000 sfgla
86.56
ITE 9th equation
1.87
2.37
TL Regression
56%
FL Curve
28.73
1.30
37.35
$15,009
$238
$4,385
$10,624
$1,565
579%
1,000 sfgla
53.28
ITE 9th equation
2.40
2.90
TL Regression
67%
FL Curve
27.16
1.30
35.31
$14,185
$214
$3,943
$10,242
$3,181
222%
1,000 sfgla
41.80
ITE 9th equation
2.64
3.14
TL Regression
73%
FL Curve
25.54
1.30
33.20
$13,338
$198
$3,648
$9,690
$5,504
76%
1,000 sfgla
36.27
ITE 9th equation
2.87
3.37
TL Regression
76%
FL Curve
25.08
1.30
32.60
$13,099
$192
$3,537
$9,562
$5,504
74%
28.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
79%
FL Studies
32.54
1.30
42.30
$16,998
$235
$4,330
$12,668
$4,482
183%
1.51
2.01
FL Studies
28%
FL Studies
103.89
1.30
135.06
$54,263
$902
$16,619
$37,644
$7,581
397%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
21.31
1.30
27.70
$11,129
$168
$3,095
$8,034
$2,498
222%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
15.67
1.30
20.37
$8,184
$124
$2,285
$5,899
$2,095
182%
56%
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
14.95
1.30
19.44
$7,809
$124
$2,285
$5,524
$2,692
105%
1,000 sf
853
Convenience Market w/Gasoline
1,000 sf
775.14
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
857
Discount Club
1,000 sf
41.80
ITE 9th Edition
862
863
Home Improvement Superstore

Electronics Superstore
880/
881
Pharmacy/Drug Store with & without Drive-Thru
890
Furniture Store
912
Bank/Savings Drive-In
1,000 sf
30.74
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
45.04
ITE 9th Edition
1.87
2.37
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
1,000 sf
95.96
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.08
2.58
FL Studies
32%
FL Studies
20.25
1.30
26.33
$10,575
$164
$3,022
$7,553
$5,269
43%
1,000 sf
5.06
ITE 9th Edition
6.09
6.59
FL Studies
54%
FL Studies
5.27
1.30
6.85
$2,755
$37
$682
$2,073
$605
243%
159.34
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.46
2.96
FL Studies
46%
FL Studies
57.16
1.30
74.31
$29,855
$449
$8,273
$21,582
$15,850
36%
3.14
3.64
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
69.82
1.30
90.77
$36,470
$528
$9,728
$26,742
$10,752
149%
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
931
Quality Restaurant
1,000 sf
91.10
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
932
High-Turn Over Restaurant
1,000 sf
116.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.17
3.67
FL Studies
71%
FL Studies
83.19
1.30
108.15
$43,452
$628
$11,571
$31,881
$7,790
309%
511.00
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.05
2.55
FL Studies
58%
FL Studies
192.60
1.30
250.38
$100,599
$1,563
$28,797
$71,802
$9,389
665%
31.43
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.62
4.12
FL Studies
72%
FL Studies
25.97
1.30
33.76
$13,564
$193
$3,556
$10,008
n/a
n/a
157.33
ITE 9th Edition

(944 & 946 Blend)
1.90
2.40
FL Studies
23%
FL Studies
21.79
1.30
28.33
$11,384
$180
$3,316
$8,068
$1,511
434%
service bay
43.94
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.18
2.68
FL Studies
68%
FL Studies
20.65
1.30
26.85
$10,785
$166
$3,058
$7,727
$6,455
20%
934
942
944/
946
Fast Food Restaurant w/Drive-Thru

Automobile Care Center
Gas/Service Station with & without Car Wash
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
fuel pos.
947
Self-Service Car Wash

INDUSTRIAL:
110
General Light Industrial
1,000 sf
6.97
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
10.47
1.30
13.61
$5,468
$75
$1,382
$4,086
$1,208
238%
120
General Heavy Industrial
1,000 sf
1.50
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
2.25
1.30
2.93
$1,177
$16
$295
$882
$1,162
-24%
140
Manufacturing
1,000 sf
3.82
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.74
1.30
7.46
$2,997
$41
$755
$2,242
$1,162
93%
150
Warehousing
1,000 sf
3.56
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.35
1.30
6.96
$2,793
$38
$700
$2,093
$860
143%
2.15
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.60
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
92%
Same as LUC 710
1.94
1.30
2.52
$1,015
$15
$276
$739
$433
71%
151
Mini-Warehouse
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
3.10
D-4
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
92%
Same as LUC 710
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
1.30
3.28
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
$1,318
$18
$332
$986
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
INDUSTRIAL:
152
1)
2)
3)
4)
High-Cube Warehouse
1,000 sf
1.68
ITE 9th Edition
2.52
n/a
n/a
Net VMT calculated as ((Trip Generation Rate* Trip Length* % New Trips)*(1-Interstate/Toll Facility Adjustment Factor)/2). This reflects the unit of vehicle miles of capacity consumed per unit of development and is multiplied by the cost per vehicle
Source: Hillsborough County Department of Development Services; Fees shown for Zone 7
The ITE 9th Edition trip generation rate was adjusted to reflect the average occupancy rate of 60 percent based on data provided by the Florida Association of RV Parks and Campgrounds
The trip generation rates recommended for the offices and shopping centers use the end-point regression value
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
D-5
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table D2
Mobility Fee Schedule Rural Area; No Sales Tax
Gasoline Tax
Interest rate:
ITE LUC
Land Use
$0.206
25
2.50%
Unit
County Revenues:
State Revenues:
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source

Fuel Efficiency:
$0.087
$0.119
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
$4,962,000
9,263
18.18 mpg
365
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source

Cost per PMC (Residential/Office/Industrial):
Cost per PMC (Other Non-Residential):
10,806
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
36.6%
$535.71
$459.18
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RESIDENTIAL:
210

du
2.62
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
5.50
1.30
7.15
$3,829
$39
$719
$3,110
$1,792
74%

du
3.96
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
8.31
1.30
10.80
$5,787
$58
$1,069
$4,718
$1,792
163%
6.11
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
12.82
1.30
16.67
$8,930
$90
$1,658
$7,272
$1,792
306%
7.81
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
16.39
1.30
21.31
$11,414
$115
$2,119
$9,295
$1,792
419%
8.76
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
18.38
1.30
23.89
$12,802
$129
$2,377
$10,425
$1,792
482%
2.38
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.85
1.30
5.01
$2,680
$28
$516
$2,164
$1,242
74%
3.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
5.82
1.30
7.57
$4,053
$42
$774
$3,279
$1,242
164%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
10.67
1.30
13.87
$7,431
$76
$1,400
$6,031
$1,242
386%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
2.41
1.30
3.13
$1,678
$17
$313
$1,365
$1,242
10%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.64
1.30
4.73
$2,533
$26
$479
$2,054
$1,242
65%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
6.69
1.30
8.70
$4,661
$48
$884
$3,777
$1,242
204%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
9.31
1.30
12.10
$6,485
$67
$1,234
$5,251
$1,097
379%
100%
n/a
6.76
1.30
8.79
$4,706
$48
$884
$3,822
$1,097
248%

220
222/
223

du
du
du
du
du
6.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

du
1.49
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
2.25
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
4.14
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
5.76
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

230
du
du
du
du
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
ITE 9th Edition
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
4.17
FL Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
100%
n/a
6.08
1.30
7.90
$4,235
$44
$811
$3,424
$901
280%
du
2.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.08
3.58
Same as LUC 210
72%
FL Studies
1.58
1.30
2.05
$1,102
$12
$221
$881
n/a
n/a
232
du
4.18
240
Mobile Home Park
du
253

LODGING:
310
Hotel
room
6.36
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
6.26
6.76
FL Studies
66%
FL Studies
8.33
1.30
10.83
$4,972
$59
$1,087
$3,885
$1,546
151%
311
Hotel; All Suites
room
4.90
ITE 9th Edition
6.26
6.76
Same as LUC 310
66%
Same as LUC 310
6.42
1.30
8.35
$3,831
$45
$829
$3,002
$1,082
177%
320
Motel
RECREATION:
room
5.63
ITE 9th Edition
4.34
4.84
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
5.96
1.30
7.75
$3,560
$43
$792
$2,768
$1,579
75%
412
General Recreation
acre
2.28
ITE 9th Edition
5.11
5.61
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.32
1.30
4.32
$1,984
$24
$442
$1,542
n/a
n/a
1.62
ITE 9th Edition

(Adjusted)
100%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.36
1.30
3.07
$1,410
$17
$313
$1,097
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
5.59
1.30
7.27
$3,337
$39
$719
$2,618
n/a
n/a
416
420
RV Park
(3)
Marina
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
site
boat berth
2.96
ITE 9th Edition
4.60
6.62
5.10
7.12
Same as LUC 240

Same as LUC 210
D-6
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table D2 (continued)
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RECREATION:
430
Golf Course
hole
35.74
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
67.50
1.30
87.75
$40,294
$474
$8,733
$31,561
$4,272
639%
2.22
2.72
FL Studies
88%
FL Studies
66.04
1.30
85.85
$39,418
$528
$9,728
$29,690
$9,164
224%
444
Movie Theater
screen
106.63
Blend ITE 6th & FL

Studies
492
Health Club
INSTITUTIONS:
1,000 sf
32.93
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
94%
FL Studies
50.53
1.30
65.69
$30,166
$362
$6,670
$23,496
n/a
n/a
520
student
1.29
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
80%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.41
1.30
1.83
$840
$10
$184
$656
$61
975%
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.99
1.30
2.59
$1,186
$14
$258
$928
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.10
1.30
2.73
$1,252
$15
$276
$976
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.78
1.30
4.91
$2,255
$27
$497
$1,758
n/a
n/a
522
student
1.62
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
530
student
1.71
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
540

(Private)
student
2.00
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
550

(Private)
560
565
610
Church
1,000 sf
Day Care Center
1,000 sf
Hospital
620
Nursing Home
630
Clinic
OFFICE:
1,000 sf
(4)
(4)

710
student
1.50
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.83
1.30
3.68
$1,691
$20
$368
$1,323
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
10.14
1.30
13.18
$6,051
$75
$1,382
$4,669
$544
758%
73%
FL Studies
33.77
1.30
43.90
$20,156
$275
$5,067
$15,089
$1,500
906%
21.36
1.30
27.77
$12,752
$150
$2,764
$9,988
unit change
n/a
9.11
ITE 9th Edition
3.90
4.40
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
71.88
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.03
2.53
FL Studies
13.22
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
77%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.59
3.09
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
2.02
1.30
2.63
$1,204
$16
$295
$909
$194
369%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
93%
FL Studies
49.95
1.30
64.94
$29,815
$358
$6,596
$23,219
$1,880
1135%
bed
2.76
1,000 sf
33.22
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
Blend ITE 9th & FL
Studies
1,000 sf
15.50
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
23.28
1.30
30.26
$16,213
$167
$3,077
$13,136
$3,728
252%
1,000 sf
13.13
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
19.72
1.30
25.64
$13,734
$141
$2,598
$11,136
$2,300
384%
(4)
1,000 sf
11.12
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
16.70
1.30
21.71
$11,631
$120
$2,211
$9,420
$1,958
381%
(4)
1,000 sf
9.41
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
14.13
1.30
18.37
$9,843
$101
$1,861
$7,982
$1,958
308%
1,000 sf
8.54
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
12.83
1.30
16.68
$8,933
$92
$1,695
$7,238
$1,958
270%
715
1,000 sf
11.65
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
17.50
1.30
22.75
$12,186
$125
$2,303
$9,883
$2,005
393%
720
1,000 sf
23.83
FL Studies
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
37.31
1.30
48.50
$25,986
$265
$4,882
$21,104
$6,262
237%
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
54.37
1.30
70.68
$37,861
$387
$7,130
$30,731
$6,262
391%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
25.90
1.30
33.67
$15,463
$204
$3,759
$11,704
$2,807
317%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
29.18
1.30
37.93
$17,417
$230
$4,238
$13,179
$3,384
290%
(4)
720

RETAIL:
1,000 sf
34.72
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
813
Discount Superstore
1,000 sf
50.82
ITE 9th Edition
815
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
57.24
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
D-7
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RETAIL:
820
(4)
(4)
(4)

841
(4)
New/Used Auto Sales
1,000 sfgla
86.56
ITE 9th equation
1.87
2.37
TL Regression
56%
FL Curve
28.73
1.30
37.35
$17,153
$238
$4,385
$12,768
$1,565
716%
1,000 sfgla
53.28
ITE 9th equation
2.40
2.90
TL Regression
67%
FL Curve
27.16
1.30
35.31
$16,212
$214
$3,943
$12,269
$3,181
286%
1,000 sfgla
41.80
ITE 9th equation
2.64
3.14
TL Regression
73%
FL Curve
25.54
1.30
33.20
$15,244
$198
$3,648
$11,596
$5,504
111%
1,000 sfgla
36.27
ITE 9th equation
2.87
3.37
TL Regression
76%
FL Curve
25.08
1.30
32.60
$14,970
$192
$3,537
$11,433
$5,504
108%
28.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
79%
FL Studies
32.54
1.30
42.30
$19,426
$235
$4,330
$15,096
$4,482
237%
1.51
2.01
FL Studies
28%
FL Studies
103.89
1.30
135.06
$62,015
$902
$16,619
$45,396
$7,581
499%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
21.31
1.30
27.70
$12,719
$168
$3,095
$9,624
$2,498
285%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
15.67
1.30
20.37
$9,354
$124
$2,285
$7,069
$2,095
237%
56%
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
14.95
1.30
19.44
$8,925
$124
$2,285
$6,640
$2,692
147%
1,000 sf
853
1,000 sf
775.14
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
857
Discount Club
1,000 sf
41.80
ITE 9th Edition
862
863

880/
881
890
Furniture Store
912
1,000 sf
30.74
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
45.04
ITE 9th Edition
1.87
2.37
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
1,000 sf
95.96
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.08
2.58
FL Studies
32%
FL Studies
20.25
1.30
26.33
$12,086
$164
$3,022
$9,064
$5,269
72%
1,000 sf
5.06
ITE 9th Edition
6.09
6.59
FL Studies
54%
FL Studies
5.27
1.30
6.85
$3,149
$37
$682
$2,467
$605
308%
159.34
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.46
2.96
FL Studies
46%
FL Studies
57.16
1.30
74.31
$34,119
$449
$8,273
$25,846
$15,850
63%
3.14
3.64
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
69.82
1.30
90.77
$41,680
$528
$9,728
$31,952
$10,752
197%
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
931
Quality Restaurant
1,000 sf
91.10
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
932
1,000 sf
116.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.17
3.67
FL Studies
71%
FL Studies
83.19
1.30
108.15
$49,659
$628
$11,571
$38,088
$7,790
389%
511.00
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.05
2.55
FL Studies
58%
FL Studies
192.60
1.30
250.38
$114,971
$1,563
$28,797
$86,174
$9,389
818%
31.43
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.62
4.12
FL Studies
72%
FL Studies
25.97
1.30
33.76
$15,501
$193
$3,556
$11,945
n/a
n/a
157.33
ITE 9th Edition

(944 & 946 Blend)
1.90
2.40
FL Studies
23%
FL Studies
21.79
1.30
28.33
$13,010
$180
$3,316
$9,694
$1,511
542%
service bay
43.94
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.18
2.68
FL Studies
68%
FL Studies
20.65
1.30
26.85
$12,326
$166
$3,058
$9,268
$6,455
44%
934
942
944/
946

1,000 sf
1,000 sf
fuel pos.
947

INDUSTRIAL:
110
1,000 sf
6.97
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
10.47
1.30
13.61
$7,291
$75
$1,382
$5,909
$1,208
389%
120
1,000 sf
1.50
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
2.25
1.30
2.93
$1,569
$16
$295
$1,274
$1,162
10%
140
Manufacturing
1,000 sf
3.82
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.74
1.30
7.46
$3,996
$41
$755
$3,241
$1,162
179%
150
Warehousing
1,000 sf
3.56
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.35
1.30
6.96
$3,724
$38
$700
$3,024
$860
252%
2.15
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.60
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
92%
Same as LUC 710
1.94
1.30
2.52
$1,354
$15
$276
$1,078
$433
149%
151
Mini-Warehouse
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
3.10
D-8
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
92%
Same as LUC 710
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
1.30
3.28
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
$1,757
$18
$332
$1,425
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
INDUSTRIAL:
152
1)
2)
3)
4)
High-Cube Warehouse
1,000 sf
1.68
ITE 9th Edition
2.52
n/a
n/a
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
D-9
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table D3
Mobility Fee Schedule Urban Area; % Sales Tax
Gasoline Tax
Interest rate:
ITE LUC
Land Use
$0.350
25
2.50%
Unit
County Revenues:
State Revenues:
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source

Fuel Efficiency:
$0.231
$0.119
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
$4,962,000
12,350
18.18 mpg
365
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source

Cost per PMC:
12,350
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
36.6%
$401.78
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RESIDENTIAL:
210

du
2.62
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
5.50
1.30
7.15
$2,872
$66
$1,216
$1,656
$1,792
-8%

du
3.96
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
8.31
1.30
10.80
$4,341
$99
$1,824
$2,517
$1,792
40%
6.11
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
12.82
1.30
16.67
$6,697
$153
$2,819
$3,878
$1,792
116%
7.81
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
16.39
1.30
21.31
$8,561
$195
$3,593
$4,968
$1,792
177%
8.76
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
18.38
1.30
23.89
$9,602
$219
$4,035
$5,567
$1,792
211%
2.38
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.85
1.30
5.01
$2,010
$47
$866
$1,144
$1,242
-8%
3.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
5.82
1.30
7.57
$3,040
$71
$1,308
$1,732
$1,242
40%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
10.67
1.30
13.87
$5,573
$130
$2,395
$3,178
$1,242
156%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
2.41
1.30
3.13
$1,258
$29
$534
$724
$1,242
-42%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.64
1.30
4.73
$1,900
$44
$811
$1,089
$1,242
-12%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
6.69
1.30
8.70
$3,496
$81
$1,492
$2,004
$1,242
61%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
9.31
1.30
12.10
$4,864
$113
$2,082
$2,782
$1,097
154%
100%
n/a
6.76
1.30
8.79
$3,530
$82
$1,511
$2,019
$1,097
84%

220
222/
223

du
du
du
du
du
6.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

du
1.49
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
2.25
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
4.14
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
5.76
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

230
du
du
du
du
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
ITE 9th Edition
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
4.17
FL Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
100%
n/a
6.08
1.30
7.90
$3,176
$75
$1,382
$1,794
$901
99%
du
2.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.08
3.58
Same as LUC 210
72%
FL Studies
1.58
1.30
2.05
$826
$20
$368
$458
n/a
n/a
232
du
4.18
240
Mobile Home Park
du
253

LODGING:
310
Hotel
room
6.36
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
6.26
6.76
FL Studies
66%
FL Studies
8.33
1.30
10.83
$4,351
$100
$1,842
$2,509
$1,546
62%
311
Hotel; All Suites
room
4.90
ITE 9th Edition
6.26
6.76
Same as LUC 310
66%
Same as LUC 310
6.42
1.30
8.35
$3,352
$77
$1,419
$1,933
$1,082
79%
320
Motel
RECREATION:
room
5.63
ITE 9th Edition
4.34
4.84
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
5.96
1.30
7.75
$3,115
$74
$1,363
$1,752
$1,579
11%
412
General Recreation
acre
2.28
ITE 9th Edition
5.11
5.61
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.32
1.30
4.32
$1,736
$40
$737
$999
n/a
n/a
1.62
ITE 9th Edition

(Adjusted)
100%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.36
1.30
3.07
$1,234
$29
$534
$700
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
5.59
1.30
7.27
$2,920
$67
$1,234
$1,686
n/a
n/a
416
420
RV Park
(3)
Marina
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
site
boat berth
2.96
ITE 9th Edition
4.60
6.62
5.10
7.12
Same as LUC 240

Same as LUC 210
D-10
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RECREATION:
430
Golf Course
hole
35.74
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
67.50
1.30
87.75
$35,257
$805
$14,832
$20,425
$4,272
378%
2.22
2.72
FL Studies
88%
FL Studies
66.04
1.30
85.85
$34,491
$897
$16,527
$17,964
$9,164
96%
444
Movie Theater
screen
106.63
Blend ITE 6th & FL

Studies
492
Health Club
INSTITUTIONS:
1,000 sf
32.93
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
94%
FL Studies
50.53
1.30
65.69
$26,395
$614
$11,313
$15,082
n/a
n/a
520
student
1.29
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
80%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.41
1.30
1.83
$735
$17
$313
$422
$61
592%
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.99
1.30
2.59
$1,038
$25
$461
$577
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.10
1.30
2.73
$1,096
$26
$479
$617
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.78
1.30
4.91
$1,973
$45
$829
$1,144
n/a
n/a
522
student
1.62
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
530
student
1.71
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
540

(Private)
student
2.00
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
550

(Private)
560
565
610
Church
1,000 sf
Day Care Center
1,000 sf
Hospital
620
Nursing Home
630
Clinic
OFFICE:
1,000 sf
(4)
(4)

710
student
1.50
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.83
1.30
3.68
$1,480
$34
$626
$854
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
10.14
1.30
13.18
$5,294
$127
$2,340
$2,954
$544
443%
73%
FL Studies
33.77
1.30
43.90
$17,637
$466
$8,586
$9,051
$1,500
503%
21.36
1.30
27.77
$11,158
$255
$4,698
$6,460
unit change
n/a
9.11
ITE 9th Edition
3.90
4.40
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
71.88
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.03
2.53
FL Studies
13.22
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
77%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.59
3.09
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
2.02
1.30
2.63
$1,053
$27
$497
$556
$194
187%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
93%
FL Studies
49.95
1.30
64.94
$26,088
$608
$11,202
$14,886
$1,880
692%
bed
2.76
1,000 sf
33.22
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
Blend ITE 9th & FL
Studies
1,000 sf
15.50
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
23.28
1.30
30.26
$12,160
$283
$5,214
$6,946
$3,728
86%
1,000 sf
13.13
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
19.72
1.30
25.64
$10,300
$240
$4,422
$5,878
$2,300
156%
(4)
1,000 sf
11.12
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
16.70
1.30
21.71
$8,724
$203
$3,740
$4,984
$1,958
155%
(4)
1,000 sf
9.41
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
14.13
1.30
18.37
$7,382
$172
$3,169
$4,213
$1,958
115%
1,000 sf
8.54
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
12.83
1.30
16.68
$6,700
$156
$2,874
$3,826
$1,958
95%
715
1,000 sf
11.65
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
17.50
1.30
22.75
$9,139
$213
$3,924
$5,215
$2,005
160%
720
1,000 sf
23.83
FL Studies
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
37.31
1.30
48.50
$19,489
$451
$8,309
$11,180
$6,262
79%
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
54.37
1.30
70.68
$28,396
$657
$12,105
$16,291
$6,262
160%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
25.90
1.30
33.67
$13,530
$347
$6,393
$7,137
$2,807
154%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
29.18
1.30
37.93
$15,240
$391
$7,204
$8,036
$3,384
138%
(4)
720

RETAIL:
1,000 sf
34.72
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
813
Discount Superstore
1,000 sf
50.82
ITE 9th Edition
815
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
57.24
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
D-11
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RETAIL:
820
(4)
(4)
(4)

841
(4)
New/Used Auto Sales
1,000 sfgla
86.56
ITE 9th equation
1.87
2.37
TL Regression
56%
FL Curve
28.73
1.30
37.35
$15,009
$404
$7,443
$7,566
$1,565
384%
1,000 sfgla
53.28
ITE 9th equation
2.40
2.90
TL Regression
67%
FL Curve
27.16
1.30
35.31
$14,185
$364
$6,706
$7,479
$3,181
135%
1,000 sfgla
41.80
ITE 9th equation
2.64
3.14
TL Regression
73%
FL Curve
25.54
1.30
33.20
$13,338
$337
$6,209
$7,129
$5,504
30%
1,000 sfgla
36.27
ITE 9th equation
2.87
3.37
TL Regression
76%
FL Curve
25.08
1.30
32.60
$13,099
$326
$6,006
$7,093
$5,504
29%
28.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
79%
FL Studies
32.54
1.30
42.30
$16,998
$400
$7,370
$9,628
$4,482
115%
1.51
2.01
FL Studies
28%
FL Studies
103.89
1.30
135.06
$54,263
$1,533
$28,245
$26,018
$7,581
243%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
21.31
1.30
27.70
$11,129
$285
$5,251
$5,878
$2,498
135%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
15.67
1.30
20.37
$8,184
$210
$3,869
$4,315
$2,095
106%
56%
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
14.95
1.30
19.44
$7,809
$210
$3,869
$3,940
$2,692
46%
1,000 sf
853
1,000 sf
775.14
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
857
Discount Club
1,000 sf
41.80
ITE 9th Edition
862
863

880/
881
890
Furniture Store
912
1,000 sf
30.74
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
45.04
ITE 9th Edition
1.87
2.37
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
1,000 sf
95.96
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.08
2.58
FL Studies
32%
FL Studies
20.25
1.30
26.33
$10,575
$278
$5,122
$5,453
$5,269
4%
1,000 sf
5.06
ITE 9th Edition
6.09
6.59
FL Studies
54%
FL Studies
5.27
1.30
6.85
$2,755
$63
$1,161
$1,594
$605
164%
159.34
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.46
2.96
FL Studies
46%
FL Studies
57.16
1.30
74.31
$29,855
$762
$14,039
$15,816
$15,850
0%
3.14
3.64
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
69.82
1.30
90.77
$36,470
$897
$16,527
$19,943
$10,752
86%
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
931
Quality Restaurant
1,000 sf
91.10
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
932
1,000 sf
116.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.17
3.67
FL Studies
71%
FL Studies
83.19
1.30
108.15
$43,452
$1,067
$19,659
$23,793
$7,790
205%
511.00
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.05
2.55
FL Studies
58%
FL Studies
192.60
1.30
250.38
$100,599
$2,655
$48,917
$51,682
$9,389
451%
31.43
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.62
4.12
FL Studies
72%
FL Studies
25.97
1.30
33.76
$13,564
$328
$6,043
$7,521
n/a
n/a
157.33
ITE 9th Edition

(944 & 946 Blend)
1.90
2.40
FL Studies
23%
FL Studies
21.79
1.30
28.33
$11,384
$305
$5,619
$5,765
$1,511
282%
service bay
43.94
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.18
2.68
FL Studies
68%
FL Studies
20.65
1.30
26.85
$10,785
$281
$5,177
$5,608
$6,455
-13%
934
942
944/
946

1,000 sf
1,000 sf
fuel pos.
947

INDUSTRIAL:
110
1,000 sf
6.97
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
10.47
1.30
13.61
$5,468
$127
$2,340
$3,128
$1,208
159%
120
1,000 sf
1.50
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
2.25
1.30
2.93
$1,177
$27
$497
$680
$1,162
-42%
140
Manufacturing
1,000 sf
3.82
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.74
1.30
7.46
$2,997
$70
$1,290
$1,707
$1,162
47%
150
Warehousing
1,000 sf
3.56
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.35
1.30
6.96
$2,793
$65
$1,198
$1,595
$860
86%
2.15
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.60
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
92%
Same as LUC 710
1.94
1.30
2.52
$1,015
$25
$461
$554
$433
28%
151
Mini-Warehouse
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
3.10
D-12
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
92%
Same as LUC 710
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
1.30
3.28
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
$1,318
$31
$571
$747
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
INDUSTRIAL:
152
1)
2)
3)
4)
High-Cube Warehouse
1,000 sf
1.68
ITE 9th Edition
2.52
n/a
n/a
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
D-13
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table D4
Mobility Fee Schedule Rural Area; % Sales Tax
Gasoline Tax
Interest rate:
ITE LUC
Land Use
$0.350
25
2.50%
Unit
County Revenues:
State Revenues:
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source

Fuel Efficiency:
$0.231
$0.119
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
$4,962,000
9,263
18.18 mpg
365
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source

10,806
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
36.6%
$535.71
$459.18
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RESIDENTIAL:
210

du
2.62
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
5.50
1.30
7.15
$3,829
$66
$1,216
$2,613
$1,792
46%

du
3.96
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
8.31
1.30
10.80
$5,787
$99
$1,824
$3,963
$1,792
121%
6.11
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
12.82
1.30
16.67
$8,930
$153
$2,819
$6,111
$1,792
241%
7.81
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
16.39
1.30
21.31
$11,414
$195
$3,593
$7,821
$1,792
336%
8.76
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
18.38
1.30
23.89
$12,802
$219
$4,035
$8,767
$1,792
389%
2.38
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.85
1.30
5.01
$2,680
$47
$866
$1,814
$1,242
46%
3.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
5.82
1.30
7.57
$4,053
$71
$1,308
$2,745
$1,242
121%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
10.67
1.30
13.87
$7,431
$130
$2,395
$5,036
$1,242
306%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
2.41
1.30
3.13
$1,678
$29
$534
$1,144
$1,242
-8%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.64
1.30
4.73
$2,533
$44
$811
$1,722
$1,242
39%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
6.69
1.30
8.70
$4,661
$81
$1,492
$3,169
$1,242
155%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
9.31
1.30
12.10
$6,485
$113
$2,082
$4,403
$1,097
301%
100%
n/a
6.76
1.30
8.79
$4,706
$82
$1,511
$3,195
$1,097
191%

220
222/
223

du
du
du
du
du
6.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

du
1.49
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
2.25
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
4.14
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
5.76
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

230
du
du
du
du
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
ITE 9th Edition
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
4.17
FL Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
100%
n/a
6.08
1.30
7.90
$4,235
$75
$1,382
$2,853
$901
217%
du
2.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.08
3.58
Same as LUC 210
72%
FL Studies
1.58
1.30
2.05
$1,102
$20
$368
$734
n/a
n/a
232
du
4.18
240
Mobile Home Park
du
253

LODGING:
310
Hotel
room
6.36
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
6.26
6.76
FL Studies
66%
FL Studies
8.33
1.30
10.83
$4,972
$100
$1,842
$3,130
$1,546
103%
311
Hotel; All Suites
room
4.90
ITE 9th Edition
6.26
6.76
Same as LUC 310
66%
Same as LUC 310
6.42
1.30
8.35
$3,831
$77
$1,419
$2,412
$1,082
123%
320
Motel
RECREATION:
room
5.63
ITE 9th Edition
4.34
4.84
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
5.96
1.30
7.75
$3,560
$74
$1,363
$2,197
$1,579
39%
412
General Recreation
acre
2.28
ITE 9th Edition
5.11
5.61
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.32
1.30
4.32
$1,984
$40
$737
$1,247
n/a
n/a
1.62
ITE 9th Edition

(Adjusted)
100%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.36
1.30
3.07
$1,410
$29
$534
$876
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
5.59
1.30
7.27
$3,337
$67
$1,234
$2,103
n/a
n/a
416
420
RV Park
(3)
Marina
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
site
boat berth
2.96
ITE 9th Edition
4.60
6.62
5.10
7.12
Same as LUC 240

Same as LUC 210
D-14
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RECREATION:
430
Golf Course
hole
35.74
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
67.50
1.30
87.75
$40,294
$805
$14,832
$25,462
$4,272
496%
2.22
2.72
FL Studies
88%
FL Studies
66.04
1.30
85.85
$39,418
$897
$16,527
$22,891
$9,164
150%
444
Movie Theater
screen
106.63
Blend ITE 6th & FL

Studies
492
Health Club
INSTITUTIONS:
1,000 sf
32.93
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
94%
FL Studies
50.53
1.30
65.69
$30,166
$614
$11,313
$18,853
n/a
n/a
520
student
1.29
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
80%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.41
1.30
1.83
$840
$17
$313
$527
$61
764%
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.99
1.30
2.59
$1,186
$25
$461
$725
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.10
1.30
2.73
$1,252
$26
$479
$773
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.78
1.30
4.91
$2,255
$45
$829
$1,426
n/a
n/a
522
student
1.62
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
530
student
1.71
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
540

(Private)
student
2.00
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
550

(Private)
560
565
610
Church
1,000 sf
Day Care Center
1,000 sf
Hospital
620
Nursing Home
630
Clinic
OFFICE:
1,000 sf
(4)
(4)

710
student
1.50
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.83
1.30
3.68
$1,691
$34
$626
$1,065
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
10.14
1.30
13.18
$6,051
$127
$2,340
$3,711
$544
582%
73%
FL Studies
33.77
1.30
43.90
$20,156
$466
$8,586
$11,570
$1,500
671%
21.36
1.30
27.77
$12,752
$255
$4,698
$8,054
unit change
n/a
9.11
ITE 9th Edition
3.90
4.40
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
71.88
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.03
2.53
FL Studies
13.22
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
77%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.59
3.09
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
2.02
1.30
2.63
$1,204
$27
$497
$707
$194
264%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
93%
FL Studies
49.95
1.30
64.94
$29,815
$608
$11,202
$18,613
$1,880
890%
bed
2.76
1,000 sf
33.22
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
Blend ITE 9th & FL
Studies
1,000 sf
15.50
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
23.28
1.30
30.26
$16,213
$283
$5,214
$10,999
$3,728
195%
1,000 sf
13.13
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
19.72
1.30
25.64
$13,734
$240
$4,422
$9,312
$2,300
305%
(4)
1,000 sf
11.12
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
16.70
1.30
21.71
$11,631
$203
$3,740
$7,891
$1,958
303%
(4)
1,000 sf
9.41
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
14.13
1.30
18.37
$9,843
$172
$3,169
$6,674
$1,958
241%
1,000 sf
8.54
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
12.83
1.30
16.68
$8,933
$156
$2,874
$6,059
$1,958
209%
715
1,000 sf
11.65
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
17.50
1.30
22.75
$12,186
$213
$3,924
$8,262
$2,005
312%
720
1,000 sf
23.83
FL Studies
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
37.31
1.30
48.50
$25,986
$451
$8,309
$17,677
$6,262
182%
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
54.37
1.30
70.68
$37,861
$657
$12,105
$25,756
$6,262
311%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
25.90
1.30
33.67
$15,463
$347
$6,393
$9,070
$2,807
223%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
29.18
1.30
37.93
$17,417
$391
$7,204
$10,213
$3,384
202%
(4)
720

RETAIL:
1,000 sf
34.72
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
813
Discount Superstore
1,000 sf
50.82
ITE 9th Edition
815
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
57.24
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
D-15
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RETAIL:
820
(4)
(4)
(4)

841
(4)
New/Used Auto Sales
1,000 sfgla
86.56
ITE 9th equation
1.87
2.37
TL Regression
56%
FL Curve
28.73
1.30
37.35
$17,153
$404
$7,443
$9,710
$1,565
520%
1,000 sfgla
53.28
ITE 9th equation
2.40
2.90
TL Regression
67%
FL Curve
27.16
1.30
35.31
$16,212
$364
$6,706
$9,506
$3,181
199%
1,000 sfgla
41.80
ITE 9th equation
2.64
3.14
TL Regression
73%
FL Curve
25.54
1.30
33.20
$15,244
$337
$6,209
$9,035
$5,504
64%
1,000 sfgla
36.27
ITE 9th equation
2.87
3.37
TL Regression
76%
FL Curve
25.08
1.30
32.60
$14,970
$326
$6,006
$8,964
$5,504
63%
28.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
79%
FL Studies
32.54
1.30
42.30
$19,426
$400
$7,370
$12,056
$4,482
169%
1.51
2.01
FL Studies
28%
FL Studies
103.89
1.30
135.06
$62,015
$1,533
$28,245
$33,770
$7,581
346%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
21.31
1.30
27.70
$12,719
$285
$5,251
$7,468
$2,498
199%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
15.67
1.30
20.37
$9,354
$210
$3,869
$5,485
$2,095
162%
56%
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
14.95
1.30
19.44
$8,925
$210
$3,869
$5,056
$2,692
88%
1,000 sf
853
1,000 sf
775.14
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
857
Discount Club
1,000 sf
41.80
ITE 9th Edition
862
863

880/
881
890
Furniture Store
912
1,000 sf
30.74
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
45.04
ITE 9th Edition
1.87
2.37
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
1,000 sf
95.96
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.08
2.58
FL Studies
32%
FL Studies
20.25
1.30
26.33
$12,086
$278
$5,122
$6,964
$5,269
32%
1,000 sf
5.06
ITE 9th Edition
6.09
6.59
FL Studies
54%
FL Studies
5.27
1.30
6.85
$3,149
$63
$1,161
$1,988
$605
229%
159.34
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.46
2.96
FL Studies
46%
FL Studies
57.16
1.30
74.31
$34,119
$762
$14,039
$20,080
$15,850
27%
3.14
3.64
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
69.82
1.30
90.77
$41,680
$897
$16,527
$25,153
$10,752
134%
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
931
Quality Restaurant
1,000 sf
91.10
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
932
1,000 sf
116.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.17
3.67
FL Studies
71%
FL Studies
83.19
1.30
108.15
$49,659
$1,067
$19,659
$30,000
$7,790
285%
511.00
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.05
2.55
FL Studies
58%
FL Studies
192.60
1.30
250.38
$114,971
$2,655
$48,917
$66,054
$9,389
604%
31.43
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.62
4.12
FL Studies
72%
FL Studies
25.97
1.30
33.76
$15,501
$328
$6,043
$9,458
n/a
n/a
157.33
ITE 9th Edition

(944 & 946 Blend)
1.90
2.40
FL Studies
23%
FL Studies
21.79
1.30
28.33
$13,010
$305
$5,619
$7,391
$1,511
389%
service bay
43.94
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.18
2.68
FL Studies
68%
FL Studies
20.65
1.30
26.85
$12,326
$281
$5,177
$7,149
$6,455
11%
934
942
944/
946

1,000 sf
1,000 sf
fuel pos.
947

INDUSTRIAL:
110
1,000 sf
6.97
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
10.47
1.30
13.61
$7,291
$127
$2,340
$4,951
$1,208
310%
120
1,000 sf
1.50
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
2.25
1.30
2.93
$1,569
$27
$497
$1,072
$1,162
-8%
140
Manufacturing
1,000 sf
3.82
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.74
1.30
7.46
$3,996
$70
$1,290
$2,706
$1,162
133%
150
Warehousing
1,000 sf
3.56
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.35
1.30
6.96
$3,724
$65
$1,198
$2,526
$860
194%
2.15
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.60
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
92%
Same as LUC 710
1.94
1.30
2.52
$1,354
$25
$461
$893
$433
106%
151
Mini-Warehouse
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
3.10
D-16
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
92%
Same as LUC 710
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
1.30
3.28
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
$1,757
$31
$571
$1,186
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
INDUSTRIAL:
152
1)
2)
3)
4)
High-Cube Warehouse
1,000 sf
1.68
ITE 9th Edition
2.52
n/a
n/a
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
D-17
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
R 17 E
R 18 E
589
275
39
S
T
D
GE
R
41
N 56TH ST
50TH ST
41
E BLVD
BLV
8
$17,947,030*
H OR
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Urban Service Area Boundary
BLOOMINGDALE AVE
7
$25,223,382*
Be
ll
Cr
Alafia River
LIT
ee
k
FISHHAW K BLV D
HIA
P IN
EC
RE
ST R
D
MacDill Air Force Base
PINELLAS
COUNTY
Zone 7
Lake Medard
RD
PRO G RE
SS
BA YS
T 30 S
LUMSDEN RD
Zone 6
FALKEN B U
RG
TURKEY CREEK RD
75
Zone 5
T 30 S
E DR
EX
S MACDILL AVE
S MANHATTAN AVE
WG
WEST SHORE BLVD
W EUCLID AVE
VD
Y BL
AND
S
T
OS
ST
OW
Peter O Knight Airport
92
BRANDON BLVD 60
618
CAUSEWAY BLVD
Zone 4
5
$0
Valrico Lake
S
T
W BAY TO BAY BLVD
W GANDY BLVD
PY
S
T
ORIENT RD
NEBRASKA AVE
EL
SI D
NN
618
CH A
e
Riv
Zone 3
JAMES L REDMAN PKWY
r
Ri
ve
Hi
lls
b
S
T
lm
Pa
CR
LOIS AVE
60
S MACDILL AVE
ADAMO DR
C R O SSTO WN
r
LVD
KENNEDY BLVD
275
or
ou
gh
ARMENIA AVE
DALE MABRY HW Y
60
S
T
COLUMBUS DR
pa
KING B
Zone 2
PLANT
CITY
XP
T 29 S
W SPRUCE ST
m
Ta
s
pa
By
al
an
C
s
FALKENBUR G RD
TAMPA
CREEK RD
60
S
T
4
$1,951,028*
301
Plant City Airport
S
T
UT H E R
ARTIN L
Zone 1
K EY
ELL CSWY
Tampa International Airport
Transportation Impact Fee Zones
TU R
RD
EY CAMPB
92
H WY
574
HILLSBOROUGH AVE
Legend
92
Tampa Executive Airport
SLIGH AVE
N
SO
W COURTN
IAL
275
92
R
EY
RN
SAM ALLEN RD
THONOTOSASSA RD
T 29 S
HA
R
DE
AN
ME
OR
IS
B
BUSCH BLVD
KNIGHTS GRIFFIN RD
FORBES RD
580
S
T
RD
XP Y
10
$2,497,543
582
S
T
TEMPLE
TERRACE
E FOWLER AVE
Lake Carroll
SON
SA
VE
MCINTOSH RD
TE R
A ND ER
VE
BR IDG
PARSONS AVE
HW
N FLORIDA AVE
NN
ARMENIA AVE
BA U G
H A VE
SE
580
S
T
ER
R IS
OR
Lake Thonotosassa
y C
AN
W AT
FLETCHER AVE
GU
ree
SHELDON RD
k
a nc
hC
re e
Dou
b le
Br
W LINE
OW
C re e
sh y
Br u
e
Cr e
589
Roc k
UC
D
EB
MCINTOSH RD
BR
B ru
sh y
S
T
MO
RR
BL
VD
Lake Magdalene
VETER
RD
B EARSS A VE
3
$0
301
2
$100,415
RD
S
T
k
re e
yC
ck
678
Ro
RID
D
BL
V
BR
UC
E
DO
W
75
TR
K
AC
NS
P
EX
1
$3,573,125
ee
S
T
CE
RA
Development & Infrastructure Services
WY
589
Cr
NR
t er
HU T C H I
SO
RD
wa
ck
SO
a
Bl
T ER
597
S
T
NH
UCHMA
PAUL B
AST PKWY
S
T
NS
S U N CO
VAN DYKE RD
568
T 27 S
ST
PK
W
Keystone Lake
PA
T
T 28 S
41
S UNC
T 27 S
TRANSPORTATION
IMPACT FEE OFFSETS
BY ZONE
S
T
RD
OA
HW
G UN N
T A R PO
G S RD
SPRIN
R 22 E
R 21 E
T 28 S
L U TZ L AKE FERN
R 20 E
R 19 E
* Includes Offsets that are split between multiple zones.
Lake Grady
RD
BO
YE
TTE
75
Be l l C r e e k
Locator Map
6
$12,976,505
T 31 S
4TH ST
Bu
ll f
r
BIG BEND RD
C re
T 31 S
og
Cre e
BA
LM
41
og
lf r
T
27
g Cree k
l fr
og
gC
re e
ek
l
Bu
ro g C r e
gC
re
ek
Bu
B ullfro g C re ek
l lf
og
Cr
Anderson Airport
t le
t ee R i v e
a
an
Li
674
S
T
ver
Li
ttl
e
301
an
a
ver
Ri
ee
e Rive r
ate
ee
Ri v
er
Riv
er
l e M anat
M
Little
te
e
Little Ma n a t
L itt
an ate e River
Li
le M
Li tt
75
tt l
e
an
T 32 S
ate
e
T 32 S
22E
PLANT
CITY
T
27
28
29
TAMPA
30
30
31
31
32
S
32
S
18
19
20
21
22E
NOTE: Every reasonable effort has been made to assure the accuracy of this map. Hillsborough County does not
assume any liability arising from use of this map. THIS MAP IS PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a
particular purpose.
ve
e Ri
an
at e
Users of this map are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted
for verification of the information contained on this map.
Li
ttl
e
R 20 E
R17
SOURCE: This map has been prepared for the inventory of real property found within Hillsborough County and is
compiled from recorded deeds, plats, and other public records; it has been based on BEST AVAILABLE data.
R 19 E
21
SUN CITY CENTER BLVD
Ri
R 18 E
20
ee
41
R 17 E
19
o
lfr
ek
B ullf
18
TEMPLE
TERRACE
29
C re
19TH AVE NE
Bu
llfr
o
ro
R17
28
Creek
ll fr
o
llf
re e
gC
fr o
ul l
Bu
Bu l
Little Manatee River
9
$27,168,030*
l f r og C ree k
Bu
Tampa Bay
Bu
l
Bu
l
R 21 E
R 22 E
601 E Kennedy Blvd

Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 272-5810
printroom@hillsboroughcounty.org
Date: 03/02/2016
Miles
Path: W:\GIS\PROJECTS\MobilityFeeZones\Maps\TranspIFZs_Offsets_EL.mxd
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY
MOBILITY FEE STUDY
DRAFT REPORT
March 4, 2016
Prepared for:
Hillsborough County Public Works
601 E. Kennedy Blvd, 22nd Floor
Tampa, Florida 33602
ph (813) 307-1868
fax (813) 272-5811
Prepared by:
Tindale Oliver
1000 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 400
Tampa, Florida, 33602
ph (813) 224-8862
fax (813) 226-2106
E-mail: nkamp@tindaleoliver.com
603013-00.15
DRAFT
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................
DEMAND COMPONENT................................................................................................
Travel Demand ........................................................................................................
Interstate & Toll Facility Discount Factor ...............................................................
Conversion of Vehicle-Trips to Person-Trips ..........................................................
COST COMPONENT ......................................................................................................
City/County Roadway Cost .....................................................................................
State Roadway Cost ................................................................................................
10
Summary of Costs (Blended Cost Analysis) ............................................................
12
Person-Miles of Capacity Added per Lane Mile (Roadways) ..................................
13
Cost per Person-Mile of Capacity Added (Roadways) ............................................
14
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Costs ......................................................................
15
Transit Capital Cost per Person-Mile of Travel .......................................................
15
CREDIT COMPONENT ...................................................................................................
17
Gasoline Tax Equivalent Credit ...............................................................................
17
Present Worth Variables .........................................................................................
18
Fuel Efficiency .........................................................................................................
18
Effective Days per Year ...........................................................................................
19
FEE DISTRICTS ANALYSIS ..............................................................................................
20
CALCULATED MOBILITY FEE SCHEDULE ........................................................................
22
Mobility Fee Calculation .........................................................................................
24
Mobility Fee Comparison ........................................................................................
24
BENEFIT DISTRICT ANALYSIS ........................................................................................
27
Appendix A: Demand Component Calculations

Appendix B: Cost Component Calculations
Appendix C:
Credit Component Calculations
Appendix D: Mobility Fee Schedule
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Introduction
Hillsborough Countys transportation impact fee schedule was initially adopted in 1985, and
updated in 1989. Since then, there has been no major update or significant changes in the
transportation impact fee rates. Hillsborough County has retained Tindale Oliver to prepare
an update study to reflect changes to the cost, credit, and demand components since 1989.
The County is interested in converting the current roadway-based transportation impact fee
to a mobility fee. A mobility fee shares the same basic principles as a road impact fee except
that it provides additional flexibility to fund capital infrastructure for transit, bicycle, and
pedestrian facilities, in addition to roads, therefore recouping costs associated with new
developments impact to the entire transportation system (excluding rail, interstates, and toll
facilities).
Per Florida Statutes, by transitioning to a mobility fee, the County will no longer require
transportation concurrency at site-plan review stage.
This report consists of the following sections:
Demand Component
Cost Component
Credit Component
Fee District Analysis
Mobility Fee Calculation
Mobility Fee Comparison
Benefit District Analysis
Methodology
The methodology used for the mobility fee study follows a consumption-driven approach in
which new development is charged based upon the proportion of person-miles of travel
(PMT) that each unit of new development is expected to consume of a lane-mile of the
transportation network. The use of PMT is one of the primary differences from the current
methodology which uses vehicle-miles of travel (VMT) to calculate the transportation impact
fee. A consumption-based fee charges new growth the proportionate share of the cost of
providing additional infrastructure available for use by new growth. In addition, per legal
requirements, a credit is subtracted from the total cost to account for the value of future tax
contributions of the new development toward any capacity expansion projects through other
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
revenue sources. Contributions used to calculate the credit component include estimates of
future non-impact fee/mobility fee revenues generated by the new development that will be
used toward capacity expansion projects. In other words, case law requires that the new
development should not be charged twice for the same service.
The mobility fees developed in this report assess a proportionate share cost for the entire
transportation network in the county, including classified County and State roadways, with
the exception of local/neighborhood roads. Generally, neighborhood roads are the
obligation of the developer and are part of the site/subdivision approvals.
Legal Standard Overview
In Florida, legal requirements related to impact fees have primarily been established through
case law since the 1980s. Generally speaking, impact fees must comply with the dual
rational nexus test, which requires that they:
Be supported by a study demonstrating that the fees are proportionate in amount to

the need created by new development paying the fee; and
Be spent in a manner that directs a proportionate benefit to new development,

typically accomplished through establishment of benefit districts and a list of capacityadding projects included in the Countys Capital Improvement Plan, Capital
Improvement Element, or another planning document/Master Plan.
In 2006, the Florida legislature passed the Florida Impact Fee Act, which recognized impact
fees as an outgrowth of home rule power of a local government to provide certain services
within its jurisdiction. 163.31801(2), Fla. Stat. The statute concerned with mostly
procedural and methodological limitations did not expressly allow or disallow any particular
public facility type from being funded with impact fees. The Act did specify procedural and
methodological prerequisites, such as the requirement of the fee being based on most recent
and localized data, a 90-day requirement for fee changes, and other similar requirements,
most of which were common to the practice already.
More recent legislation further affected the impact fee framework in Florida, including the
following:
HB 227 in 2009: The Florida legislation statutorily clarified that in any action
challenging an impact fee, the government has the burden of proving by a
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
preponderance of the evidence that the imposition or amount of the fee meets the
requirements of state legal precedent or the Impact Fee Act and that the court may
not use a deferential standard.
SB 360 in 2009: Allowed fees to be decreased without the 90-day notice period
required to increase the fees and purported to change the standard of legal review
associated with impact fees. SB 360 also required the Florida Department of
Community Affairs (now the Department of Economic Opportunity) and Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) to conduct studies on mobility fees, which
were completed in 2010.
HB 7207 in 2011: Required a dollar-for-dollar credit, for purposes of concurrency

compliance, for impact fees paid and other concurrency mitigation required. The
payment must be reduced by the percentage share the projects traffic represents of
the added capacity of the selected improvement (up to a maximum of 20 percent or
to an amount specified by ordinance, whichever results in a higher credit).
HB 319 in 2013: Applied mostly to concurrency management authorities, but also

encouraged local governments to adopt alternative mobility systems using a series of
tools identified in section 3180(5)(f), Florida Statutes, including:
1. Adoption of long-term strategies to facilitate development patterns that
support multi-modal solutions, including urban design, and appropriate land use
mixes, including intensity and density.
2. Adoption of an area-wide level of service not dependent on any single road
segment function.
3. Exempting or discounting impacts of locally desired development, such as
development in urban areas, redevelopment, job creation, and mixed use on the
transportation system.
4. Assigning secondary priority to vehicle mobility and primary priority to ensuring
a safe, comfortable, and attractive pedestrian environment, with convenient
interconnection to transit.
5. Establishing multimodal level of service standards that rely primarily on nonvehicular modes of transportation where existing or planned community design
will provide adequate level of mobility.
6. Reducing impact fees or local access fees to promote development within urban
areas, multimodal transportation districts, and a balance of mixed-use
development in certain areas or districts, or for affordable or workforce housing.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Also, under HB 319, a mobility fee funding system expressly must comply with the dual
rational nexus test applicable to traditional impact fees. Furthermore, any mobility fee
revenues collected must be used to implement the local governments plan, which served as
the basis for the fee. Finally, under HB 319, an alternative mobility system, that is not mobility
feebased, must not impose upon new development any responsibility for funding an existing
transportation deficiency.
The following paragraphs provide further detail on the generally applicable legal standards
applicable here.
Mobility Fee Definition
A mobility fee is a one-time capital charge levied against new development.
A mobility fee is designed to cover the portion of the capital costs of infrastructure
capacity consumed by new development.
The principle purpose of a mobility fee is to assist in funding the implementation of

projects identified in the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and other capital
improvement programs for the respective facility/service categories.
A mobility fee replaces concurrency at site-plan review stage.
Mobility Fee vs. Tax
A mobility fee is generally regarded as a regulatory function established as a condition

for improving property and is not established for the primary purpose of generating
revenue, as taxes are.
Mobility fee expenditures must convey a proportional benefit to the fee payer. This
is accomplished through the establishment of benefit districts, where fees collected
in a benefit district are spent in the same benefit district. This report established five
mobility fee benefit districts in Hillsborough County.
A mobility fee must be tied to a proportional need for new infrastructure capacity
created by new development.
Included in this document is the necessary support material used in the calculation of the
mobility fee. The general equation used to compute the mobility fee for a given land use is:
[Demand x Cost] Credit = Fee
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
The demand for travel placed on the transportation system is expressed in units of PMT (daily
trip generation rate x the trip length x the percent new trips [of total trips] x the person-mile
conversion factor) for each land use contained in the mobility fee schedule. The trip
generation is expressed in terms of average daily rates since new development consumes
trips on a daily basis. The cost of building new capacity typically is expressed in units of dollars
per person-mile or lane-mile of transportation system capacity. The credit is an estimate of
the future non-impact fee revenues generated by new development that are allocated to
transportation system capacity expansion. Thus, the mobility fee is an up front payment
for a portion of the cost associated with the transportation facilities consumed by the
development.
It should be noted that, consistent with the State Impact Fee Act requirements, the
information used to develop the mobility fee schedule was based on the most recent and
localized data available. The input variables used in the fee equation are as follows:
Demand Variables:
Trip generation rate
Trip length
Percent new trips
Vehicle-trips to person-trips factor
Cost Variables:
Roadway cost per lane mile
Roadway capacity per lane mile
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities capital costs
Transit capital cost per person-mile of travel
Credit Variables:
Equivalent gas tax credit (pennies)
Present worth
Fuel efficiency
Effective days per year
A review of the mobility fee variables and corresponding recommendations are presented in
the following sections.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Demand Component
Travel Demand
The amount of road system consumed by a unit of new land development is calculated using
the following variables and is a measure of the vehicle miles of new travel a unit of
development places on the existing roadway system:
Number of daily trips generated;
Average length of those trips; and
Proportion of travel that is new travel, rather than travel that is already on the
transportation system.
As part of this update, the trip characteristics variables were obtained primarily from two
sources: (1) similar studies conducted throughout Florida (Florida Studies Database) and (2)
the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation reference report (9th edition).
The Florida Trip Characteristics Studies Database is included in Appendix A. This database
was used to determine trip length, percent new trips, and trip rate for some land uses.
Interstate &Toll Facility Discount Factor
This variable was used to recognize that interstate highway and toll facility improvements are
funded by the State (specifically, the Florida Department of Transportation) using earmarked
State and Federal funds. Typically, mobility fees are not used to pay for these improvements
and the portion of travel occurring on the interstate/toll facility system is usually eliminated
from the total travel for each use.
To calculate the interstate and toll (I/T) facility discount factor, the loaded highway network
file was generated for the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Model (TBRPM v8.0). A select link
analysis was run for all traffic analysis zones located within Hillsborough County in order to
differentiate trips with an origin and/or destination within the county versus trips with no
origin or destination within the county.
Currently, interstate and toll facilities in Hillsborough County include I-275, I-75, I-4, the
Suncoast Parkway, the Lee Roy Selmon Expressway and the Veterans Expressway (to Dale
Mabry). The limited access vehicle-miles of travel (Limited Access VMT) for trips with an
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
origin and/or destination within County was calculated for the identified limited access
facilities. The total Hillsborough County VMT was calculated for all trips with an origin and/or
destination within County for all roads, including limited access facilities, located within
Hillsborough County.
The I/T discount factor of 36.6 percent was determined by dividing the total limited access
VMT by the total County VMT. By applying this factor to the total County VMT, the reduced
VMT is then representative of only the roadways which are funded by impact/mobility fees.
Appendix A, Table A-1 provides further detail on this calculation.
Conversion of Vehicle-Trips to Person-Trips
In the case of the mobility approach, it is necessary to estimate travel in units of person-miles.
Vehicle-trips were converted to person-trips by applying a vehicle-trip to person-trip
conversion factor of 1.30. This value was derived from a review of the TBRPM v8.0 and
nationwide travel data and vehicle occupancy levels observed in other communities
throughout Florida. Given that a large portion of travel occurs via automobile, this approach
is found to be reasonable.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Cost Component
Since the Countys current impact fee calculation, which was last updated in 1989, there has
been significant increases in transportation costs. Especially over the past 10 years,
transportation capital costs fluctuated significantly in Florida. Costs increased significantly
between 2005 and 2007 due to additional construction demand caused by hurricanes, the
housing market growth, and other factors. Appreciation in land values also resulted in higher
right-of-way (ROW) costs during the same period. In early 2008, costs started to stabilize and
between 2008 and 2011 most communities experienced a decrease in construction costs,
returning to levels seen before 2005. In 2013/2014, roadway costs started to increase again
in Florida and have continued to increase. Cost information from Hillsborough County, other
Florida Counties, and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) was reviewed to
develop a unit cost for all phases involved in the construction of one lane-mile of roadway
capacity. Additionally, cost information for bicycle/pedestrian and transit facilities was
reviewed and included in the cost component calculations for the mobility fee rate. The
following sections summarize the methodology and findings of the total unit cost analysis for
all modes of travel. Appendix B provides the data and other support information utilized in
these analyses.
County Roadway Cost
This section examines the right-of-way (ROW), construction and other cost components
associated with county roads with respect to transportation capacity expansion
improvements in Hillsborough County. For this purpose, recent bid data for recently
completed/ongoing local projects and recent construction bid data from roadway projects
throughout Florida were used to identify and provide supporting cost data for County
roadway improvements. The cost for each roadway capacity project was separated into four
phases: design, construction/engineering inspection (CEI), ROW, and construction.
Design and CEI
Design costs for county roads were estimated at 12 percent of construction phase costs based
on a review of recently completed and ongoing local improvements and a recent
transportation impact fee studies throughout Florida. Additional detail is included in
Appendix B, Tables B-2 and B-10.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
CEI costs for county roads were estimated at nine (9) percent of construction phase costs
based on a review of recently completed and ongoing local improvements and a review of
recent transportation impact fee studies throughout Florida. Additional detail is included in
Appendix B, Tables B-8 and B-17.
Right-of-Way
The ROW cost reflects the total cost of the acquisitions along a corridor that were necessary
to have sufficient cross-section width to widen an existing road or, in the case of new
construction, to build a new road. A review of recent ROW cost data for Hillsborough County
identified 13 improvements with acquisition data. Using the construction costs for these
improvements, a ROW-to-construction factor was calculated for each improvement, ranging
from 4 to 119 percent, with a weighted average of approximately 44 percent. Based on this
review and discussions with staff, ROW costs were estimated at 50 percent of the county road
construction costs for the mobility fee calculation. The use of a 50 percent ROW factor is
higher than other ROW ratios seen in recent impact fee studies throughout Florida, which
average approximately 41 percent for county roadways. This reflects Countys urban nature,
which results in higher ROW costs compared to other jurisdictions that are not as urbanized.
Additional detail is included in Appendix B, Tables B-4 and B-12.
Construction
The construction cost for county roads was based on a review of local and statewide projects.
A review of recent construction cost data for Hillsborough County identified 13 recent
capacity expansion improvements averaging $3.02 million per lane mile, as shown in
Appendix B, Table B-14.
In addition to local improvements, recent bids from multiple communities throughout the
state were also reviewed. This review included more than 320 lane miles of urban-design
(curb & gutter) roadway improvements from 17 counties and calculated and average cost of
$2.15 million per lane mile. Appendix B, Table B-15 provides a detailed description of the
projects reviewed.
Based on this review and a discussion with staff, a county roadway cost of $3.00 million per
lane mile was used in the mobility fee calculation for county roads with urban-design
characteristics.
To determine the cost per lane mile for county roads with rural-design characteristics (open
drainage), the relationship between urban and rural roadway costs from the FDOT District 7
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Long Range Estimates (LRE)1 was reviewed. Based on these cost estimates, the costs for
roadways with rural-design characteristics were estimated at approximately 77 percent of
the costs for roadways with urban-design characteristics. Additional detail is provided in
Appendix B, Table B-1.
To determine the weighted average cost for county roadways, the cost for urban-design and
rural-design roadways were weighted based on the distribution of urban and rural roadways
included in the Hillsborough County Metropolitan Planning Organizations 2040 Long Range
Transportation Plans Cost Feasible Plan and the Community Transportation Plan (Appendix
B, Table B-19). As shown in Table 1, the weighted average county roadway construction cost
was calculated at approximately $2.90 million per lane mile, with a total weighted average
cost of $4.95 million per lane mile for county roadways.
Table 1
Estimated Total Cost per Lane Mile for County Roads
Cost Phase
Design
Average
(6)
$360,000
$277,000
$348,000
$1,500,000
$1,155,000
$1,448,000
(3)
$3,000,000
$2,310,000
$2,897,000
$270,000
$208,000
$261,000
$5,130,000
$3,950,000
$4,954,000
85%
15%
100%
(4)
Total Cost
Lane Mile Distribution
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Weighted
(2)
Right-of-Way
CEI
Urban
Design
(1)
Construction
Cost per Lane Mile

Rural
Design
(5)
Source: Appendix B, Table B-2

Source: Appendix B, Table B-19; Items (c) and (d)
Urban/Rural distribution (Item 5) multiplied by the design, ROW, construction, and CEI
phase costs to develop a weighted average cost per lane mile
State Roadway Cost

This section examines the right-of-way, construction and other cost components associated
with state roads with respect to transportation capacity expansion improvements in
Hillsborough County. For this purpose, recent data from state roadway projects bid in
Hillsborough County and throughout Florida and the FDOTs Long Range Estimates were used
1
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/policy/costs/
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
10
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
to identify and provide supporting cost data for state improvements. The cost for each
roadway capacity-expansion project was separated into four phases: design, CEI, ROW, and
construction.
Design and CEI
Design and CEI costs for state roads were each estimated at 11 percent of construction phase
costs based on a review of recent transportation impact fee studies throughout Florida.
Additional detail is provided in Appendix B, Tables B-11 (design) and B-18 (CEI).
Right-of-Way
Given the limited data on ROW costs for state roads in Hillsborough County and based on
experience in other jurisdictions, the ROW cost ratio calculation for county roads was also
applied to state roads. Using this ROW-to-construction ratio of 50 percent, the ROW cost for
state roads with urban design characteristics is approximately $1.50 million per lane mile.
Construction
A review of recent state road capacity improvements in Hillsborough County identified three
historical improvements, as shown in Appendix B, Table B-16:
CR 39/Alexander St from N. of I-4 to N. of Knights Griffin
SR 574 (MLK Jr. Blvd) from W. of Highview Rd to E. of Parsons Ave
SR 41 (US 301) from S. of Tampa Bypass Canal to N. of Fowler Ave
These improvements ranged from approximately $1.16 million per lane mile all the way to
$4.35 million per lane mile for construction, with the two most recent improvements
averaging approximately $4.20 million per lane mile. To increase the sample size, these costs
were compared to costs for state road improvements for several other jurisdiction
throughout the state. Considering 70 improvements with over 340 lane miles, the weighted
average cost per lane mile for state road construction was approximately $3.10 million per
lane mile. Appendix B, Table B-16 provides a detailed description of the projects analyzed.
Based on this review, a state roadway construction cost of $3.00 million per lane mile was
used in the mobility fee calculation.
To determine the cost per lane mile for state roads with rural design characteristics, the
relationship between urban and rural roadway costs for state roadways was reviewed. With
only limited local data available, the recent data from the FDOT District 7 LRE was reviewed.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
11
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Based on these costs estimates, the costs for roadways with rural design characteristics were
estimated to be approximately 77 percent of the costs for roadways with urban design
characteristics. Additional detail is provided in Appendix B, Table B-1.
To determine the weighted average cost for state roadways, the cost for urban-design and
rural-design roadways were weighted based on the distribution of urban and rural roadways
included in the Countys 2040 Long Range Transportation Plans Cost Feasible Plan and the
Community Transportation Plan (Appendix B, Table B-19). As shown in Table 2, the weighted
average county roadway construction cost was calculated at approximately $2.90 million per
lane mile, with a total weighted average cost of $4.98 million per lane mile for state roadways.
Table 2
Cost per Lane Mile for State Roads
Urban
Design
Cost Phase
Design
(1)
Right-of-Way
Construction
CEI
(2)
(3)
(4)
Total Cost
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Cost per Lane Mile

Rural
Design
Weighted
Average
(6)
$330,000
$254,000
$319,000
$1,500,000
$1,155,000
$1,448,000
$3,000,000
$2,310,000
$2,897,000
$330,000
$254,000
$319,000
$5,160,000
$3,973,000
$4,983,000
85%
15%
100%
(5)

Source: Appendix B, Table B-19; Items (c) and (d)
Urban/Rural distribution (Item 5) multiplied by the design, ROW, construction, and
CEI phase costs to develop a weighted average cost per lane mile
Summary of Costs (Blended Cost Analysis)

The weighted average cost per lane mile for county and state roads is presented in Table 3.
The resulting weighted average cost of approximately $4.96 million per lane mile was utilized
as the roadway cost input in the calculation of the mobility fee schedule. The weighted
average cost per lane mile includes county and state roads and is based on weighting the lane
miles of roadway improvements in the Countys 2040 Long Range Transportation Plans Cost
Feasible Plan and the Community Transportation Plan.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
12
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table 3
Estimated Cost per Lane Mile for
County and State Roadway Projects in Hillsborough County
(1)
Cost Type
County Roads
Design
(2)
State Roads
County and
(3)
State Roads
$348,000
$319,000
$340,000
Right-of-Way
$1,448,000
$1,448,000
$1,448,000
Construction
$2,897,000
$2,897,000
$2,897,000
$261,000
$319,000
$277,000
$4,954,000
$4,983,000
$4,962,000
72%
28%
100%
CEI
Total
(4)
1) Source: Table 1
2) Source: Table 2
3) Lane mile distribution (Item 4) multiplied by the design, ROW, construction, and
CEI phase costs by jurisdiction to develop a weighted average cost per lane mile
4) Source: Appendix B, Table B-19; Items (a) and (b)
Person-Miles of Capacity Added per Lane Mile (Roadways)

An additional component of the transportation fee equation is the capacity added per lane
mile (also known as the maximum service volume added per mile) of roadway constructed.
To calculate the vehicle-miles of capacity (VMC) per lane mile of constructed future roadway,
an analysis of the Hillsborough County 2040 Long Range Transportation Plans Cost Feasible
Plan and the Community Transportation Plan (see Appendix B, Table B-19) was conducted to
review improvements that will be built in Hillsborough County in the future. As shown in
Table 4, the VMC was then converted to person-miles of capacity (PMC) using the person-trip
factor (1.30 persons per vehicle) previously discussed.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
13
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table 4
Weighted Average Capacity Added per Lane Mile
Lane Mile
Source
(1)
Added
VehicleMiles of
(1)
Capacity Added
VMC Added VehicleTrip to PMC Added

per Lane
PersonTrip
per Lane
Mile
(2)
(3)
Factor
Mile
(4)
County Roads
98.06
891,447
9,091
1.30
11,818
State Roads
38.32
398,156
10,390
1.30
13,507
Total
136.38
1,289,603
(5)
Weighted Average VMC Added per Lane Mile

9,500
1.30
12,350
1) Source: Appendix B, Table B-19
2) Vehicle-miles of capacity added (Item 2) divided by lane mile added (Item 1)
3) Source: Based on a review of the transportation model, nation-wide vehicle occupancy data, and peer
jurisdictions
4) VMC added per lane mile (Item 3) multiplied by the vehicle-trip to person-trip factor (Item 4)
5) Total vehicles miles of capacity added for city/county and state roads (Item 2) divided by the total lane miles
added (Item 1)
Cost per Person-Mile of Capacity Added (Roadways)

The transportation cost per unit of development is assessed based on the cost per personmile of capacity. As shown in Tables 3 and 4, the cost and capacity for roadways in
Hillsborough County have been calculated based on typical roadway improvements. As
shown in Table 5, the cost per PMC for travel within County is $401.78.
The cost per PMC figure is used in the transportation fee calculation to determine the total
mobility cost per unit of development based on the person-miles of travel consumed. For
each person-mile of travel that is added to the road system, approximately $400 of
transportation capacity is consumed.
Table 5
Cost per PersonMile of Capacity Added (Roadways)
Source
Cost per Lane

Mile
(1)
Average PMC
Added per Lane
Mile
(2)
Cost per
PMC
(3)
County Roads
$4,954,000
11,818
$419.19
State Roads
$4,983,000
13,507
$368.92
Weighted Average
$4,962,000
12,350
$401.78
1) Source: Table 3
2) Source: Table 4
3) Cost per lane mile (Item 1) divided by average PMC added per lane mile (Item 2)
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
14
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Costs
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities provide for relatively small quantities of the total vehiclemiles of travel due to the difference in the average distance traveled by a car trip versus
pedestrian/bicycle trips. Because of their relatively small role in the urban travel scheme,
they do not have a significant effect on evaluating the costs of providing for mobility.
However, bike and pedestrian facilities are important and provide a source of travel for those
who cannot drive or cannot afford to drive, and they are a standard part of the urban street
and sometimes included in rural roadways. Their costs are included in the standard roadway
cross-sections for which costs are estimated for safety and mobility reasons. Thus, the costs
of these facilities on major roads are included in the mobility fee. The mobility fee provides
funding for only those bike and pedestrian facilities associated with roadways on the
classified road system (excluding local/neighborhood roads), and allows for facilities to be
added to existing classified roadways or included in the construction of a new classified
roadway or lane addition improvement.
Transit Capital Cost per Person-Mile of Travel
A model for transit service and cost was developed to establish both the capital cost per
person-mile of capacity and the system operating characteristics in terms of system coverage,
hours of service, and headways. The model developed for Hillsborough County was based on
information from the Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authoritys (HART) Transit
Development Plan. Components of the transit capital cost include:
Vehicle acquisition tied to new routes
Bus stops, shelters, and benches
Cost of road network used by transit vehicles
Transit capital costs are computed as the cost of capital features needed to expand the transit
system, as follows:
Transit Capital Cost = Bus Infrastructure Cost + Road Capacity Cost
Taking into account the infrastructure costs and the decline in potential vehicle-capacity that
comes with adding transit, it was determined that the difference between constructing a lane
mile of roadway (for cars only) versus constructing a roadway with transit is not significant.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
15
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
The roadway with transit cost per PMC is less than four (4) percent higher per lane mile than
the cost to simply construct a road without transit amenities. Therefore, for the mobility fee
calculation, the cost per PMC of approximately $400 is representative of the cost to provide
transportation capacity for all modes of travel. Additional information regarding the transit
capital cost calculation is included in Appendix B, Table B-20.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
16
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Credit Component
Gasoline Tax Equivalent Credit
The present value of the portion of gasoline taxes generated by new development over a 25year period that is expected to be expended on capacity expansion projects was credited
against the cost of the system consumed by travel associated with new development.
County
As show in Table 6, Hillsborough County spends the equivalent of 5.3 pennies on
transportation capacity-expansion projects funded with non-impact fee revenues. In
addition, the County receives an equivalent credit of 3.4 pennies for debt service associated
with transportation capacity improvements.
An additional revenue credit option was developed to reflect the increased transportation
capacity funding that would become available if the proposed 0.5 percent local option sales
tax is passed in Hillsborough County. Based on the current project list and projected
revenues, this would increase the revenue credit by 14.4 equivalent pennies.
State
As show in Table 6, State expenditures on state roads were reviewed, and a credit for the
capacity-expansion portion attributable to state projects was estimated (excluding
expenditures on limited access facilities). The review, which included 10 years of historical
expenditures, as well as 5 years of planned expenditures, indicated that FDOT spending
generates an equivalent gas tax credit of 11.9 pennies of gas tax revenue annually. The use
of a 15-year period for developing a State credit results in a reasonably stable credit for
Hillsborough County, since it accounts for the volatility in FDOT spending in the county over
short time periods.
In summary, Hillsborough County contributes approximately 8.7 pennies with the potential
to increase this contribution to 23.0 total pennies with the adoption of the additional sales
tax. FDOT is spending gas tax revenues at an average of 11.9 equivalent pennies for state
transportation projects in Hillsborough County. Therefore, a total of 20.6 pennies (without
sales tax) or a total of 35.0 pennies (with sales tax) were included in the mobility fee equation
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
17
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
to recognize the future capital revenue that is expected to be generated by new development
from all non-impact fee revenues, as shown in Table 6.
Table 6
Equivalent Pennies of Gas Tax Revenue
Equivalent Pennies per Gallon
w/o Sales Tax
w/Sales Tax
Credit
County Revenues
(1)
County Debt Service

County Sales Tax
State Revenues
(2)
(3)
(4)
Total
1)
2)
3)
4)
$0.053
$0.053
$0.034
$0.034
$0.144
$0.119
$0.119
$0.206
$0.350
Source: Appendix C, Table C-2

Present Worth Variables

Facility Life
The facility life used in the mobility fee analysis is 25 years, which represents the reasonable
life of a roadway.
Interest Rate
This is the discount rate at which gasoline tax revenues might be bonded. It is used to
compute the present value of the gasoline taxes generated by new development. The
discount rate of 2.5 percent was used in the mobility fee calculation based on information
obtained from Hillsborough County.
Fuel Efficiency
The fuel efficiency (i.e., the average miles traveled per gallon of fuel consumed) of the fleet
of motor vehicles was estimated using the quantity of gasoline consumed by travel associated
with a particular land use.
Appendix C, Table C-12 documents the calculation of the fuel efficiency value based on the
following equation, where VMT is vehicle miles of travel and MPG is fuel efficiency in
terms of miles per gallon.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
18
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
VMTVehicle Type
Fuel Efficiency VMTRoadway Type

MPGVehicle Type
Roadway Type
The methodology uses non-interstate VMT and average fuel efficiency data for passenger
vehicles (i.e., passenger cars and other 2-axle, 4-tire vehicles, such as vans, pickups, and SUVs)
and large trucks (i.e., single-unit, 2-axle, 6-tire or more trucks and combination trucks) to
calculate the total gallons of fuel used by each of these vehicle types.
The combined total VMT for the vehicle types is then divided by the combined total gallons
of fuel consumed to calculate, in effect, a weighted fuel efficiency value that appropriately
accounts for the existing fleet mix of traffic on non-interstate roadways. The VMT and
average fuel efficiency data were obtained from the most recent Highway Statistics 2014
(Federal Highway Administration). Based on the calculation completed in Appendix C, Table
C-12, the fuel efficiency rate to be used in the updated mobility fee equation is 18.18 miles
per gallon.
Effective Days per Year
An effective 365 days per year of operation was assumed for all land uses in the proposed
fee. However, this will not be the case for all land uses since some uses operate only on
weekdays (e.g., office buildings) and/or only seasonally (e.g., schools). The use of 365 days
per year, therefore, provides a conservative estimate, ensuring that gasoline taxes are
adequately credited against the fee.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
19
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Fee District Analysis
Currently, Hillsborough County has 10 transportation impact fee assessment zones. Each
zone has a different fee rate for each land use in the impact fee schedule. The proposed
mobility fee will have two different schedules: one for development within the Urban Service
Area (USA) and the other for development outside of the USA. The fees in the USA are based
on the adopted level-of-service (LOS) standard2. Currently, on average, the roadways outside
of the USA are performing significantly better than the adopted LOS standard and in an effort
to maintain this higher level of performance, a differential capacity option was developed.
To create a transportation capacity differential, a review of the current volume-to-capacity
(V/C) ratio of all county and state roadways in Hillsborough was conducted. Figures 1 and 2
illustrate the distribution of roadway VMT based on each road segments current V/C ratio.
Figure 1 illustrates all of those segments within the USA (urban district) and Figure 2
illustrates those segments outside of the USA (rural district). As shown, the rural area
roadways have a much lower V/C ratio, indicating that those segments are less congested.
Figure 1: Percent of VMT by V/C Ratio (Inside Urban Service Area)
18.0%
16.0%
14.0%
12.0%
10.0%
8.0%
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0+
Source: Hillsborough County MPO, 2014 Level of Service Report
House Bill 319 emphasizes the adoption of an area-wide level-of-service not dependent on any single roadway segment
function
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
20
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Figure 2: Percent of VMT by V/C Ratio (Outside Urban Service Area)
18.0%
16.0%
14.0%
12.0%
10.0%
8.0%
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0+
Source: Hillsborough County MPO, 2014 Level of Service Report
Within the USA, new development will be charged for their fair-share of travel added with
the adopted roadway LOS standard. Recognizing the higher quality of service currently
provided in the rural area, the County could elect to charge a higher fee outside of the USA
in an effort to preserve this higher LOS.
Based on the average V/C ratio achieved in the rural zone (0.6), as compared to the urban
zone (0.8), the capacity adjustment would need to be approximately 25 percent. Therefore,
the rural area person-miles of capacity added per lane mile would be reduced to
approximately 9,263. However, this reduction would only be applied to residential, office,
and industrial land uses. These land uses generally demand the longer trip lengths and
receive significant benefit from the high service levels, whereas retail uses attract more local
travel with shorter trip lengths and the benefit they receive is more limited. Therefore, the
retail uses are estimated to receive a capacity decrease of 12.5 percent.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
21
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Calculated Mobility Fee Schedule
The mobility fee calculations for each land use are included in Appendix D, which includes the
major land use categories and the mobility fees for the individual land uses contained in each
of the major categories. For each land use, Appendix D illustrates the following:
Demand component variables (trip rate, trip length, percent new trips, and persontrip factor);
Total mobility cost
Annual gas tax credit
Present value of the gas tax credit
Net mobility fee
Current Hillsborough County transportation impact fee
Percent difference between the calculated fee and the current impact fee
It should be noted that the net mobility fee illustrated in Appendix D is not necessarily a
recommended fee, but instead represents a technically documented mobility fee per unit of
land use that could be charged in Hillsborough County.
For clarification purposes, it may be useful to walk through the calculation of a mobility fee
one of the land use categories. In the following example, the net mobility fee rate is
calculated for the single-family residential land use category (ITE LUC 210) using information
from the proposed impact fee schedule included in Appendix D, Table D-1. For each land use
category, the following equations are utilized to calculate the net mobility fee:
Net Mobility Fee = Total Mobility Cost Gas Tax Credit
Where:
Total Mobility Cost = ([Trip Rate x Assessable Trip Length x % New Trips] / 2) x (1
Interstate/Toll Facility Discount Factor) x (Person-Trip Factor) * (Cost per Person-Mile of
Capacity)
Gas Tax Credit = Present Value (Annual Gas Tax), given a 2.5% interest rate & a 25-year
facility life
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
22
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Annual Gas Tax = ([Trip Rate x Total Trip Length x % New Trips] / 2) x (Effective Days per
Year x $/Gallon to Capital) / Fuel Efficiency
Each of the inputs has been discussed previously in this document; however, for purposes of
this example, brief definitions for each input are provided in the following paragraphs, along
with the actual inputs used in the calculation of the fee for the single-family detached
residential (1,500-2,499 sf) land use category:
Trip Rate = the average daily trip generation rate, in vehicle-trips/day (7.81)
Assessable Trip Length = the actual average trip length for the category, in vehicle-miles
(6.62)
Total Trip Length = the assessable trip length plus an adjustment factor of half a mile,
which is added to the trip length to account for the fact that gas taxes are collected for
travel on all roads including local roads (6.62 + 0.50 = 7.12)
% New Trips = adjustment factor to account for trips that are already on the roadway
(100%)
Divide by 2 = the total daily miles of travel generated by a particular category (i.e.,
rate*length*% new trips) is divided by two to prevent the double-counting of travel
generated among land use codes since every trip has an origin and a destination
Person-Trip Factor = Converts vehicle-miles of travel to person-miles of travel (1.30)
Interstate/Toll Facility Discount Factor = discount factor to account for the travel
demand occurring on interstate highways and/or toll facilities (36.6%)
Cost per Person-Mile of Capacity = unit of person-miles of capacity consumed per unit
of development ($401.78)
Effective Days per Year = 365 days
$/Gallon to Capital = the amount of gas tax revenue per gallon of fuel that is used for
capital improvements, in $/gallon ($0.206)
Fuel Efficiency = average fuel efficiency of vehicles, in vehicle-miles/gallon (18.18)
Present Value = calculation of the present value of a uniform series of cash flows, gas
tax payments in this case, given an interest rate, i, and a number of periods, n; for
2.5% interest and a 25-year facility life, the uniform series present worth factor is
18.4244
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
23
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Mobility Fee Calculation
Using these inputs, a net mobility fee can be calculated for the single-family residential (1,5002,499 sf) detached land use category, for the urban area, with no sales tax credit:
Total Mobility Cost = ([7.81 * 6.62 * 1.0] /2) * (1 0.366) * 1.30 * ($401.78) = $8,561
Annual Gas Tax = ([7.81 * 7.12 * 1.0] /2) * 365 * ($0.206 /18.18) = $115
Revenue Credit = $115 * 18.4244 = $2,119
Net Mobility Fee = $8,561 - $2,100 = $6,442
As part of the work effort in developing Hillsborough County mobility fee program, a
comparison of calculated fees to mobility/multi-modal/roadway impact fee schedules
adopted in other jurisdictions was completed, as shown in Tables 7a and 7b.
It should be noted that the differences in fee levels for a given land use can be caused by
several factors, including the year of the technical study, adoption percentage, study
methodology including variations in costs, credits and travel demand, land use categories
included in the fee schedule, etc.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
24
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table 7a
(2)
Land Use
Unit
No Sales Tax
(3)
Date of Last Update

(1)
Assessed Portion of Calculated

Residential:
Single Family Detached (2,000 sq ft)
Non-Residential:
Light Industrial
Office (50,000 sq ft)
Retail (125,000 sq ft)
Bank w/Drive-In
Fast Food w/Drive-Thru
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Hillsborough County
1/2% Sales Tax
(4)
(5)
(8)
(7)
(6)
Urban
2016
Rural
2016
Urban
2016
Rural
2016
100%
100%
100%
100%
Existing
Pinellas
Polk
Pasco County
(9)
1985
Urban
2014
Suburban
2014
Rural
2014
100%
100%
100%
100%
(10)
County
County
2015
1990
50%
n/a
du
$6,442
$9,295
$4,968
$7,821
$1,475
$5,835
$8,570
$9,800
$1,077
$2,066
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
$4,086
$9,083
$10,242
$21,582
$71,802
$5,909
$13,136
$12,269
$25,846
$86,174
$3,128
$6,946
$7,479
$15,816
$51,682
$4,951
$10,999
$9,506
$20,080
$66,054
$994
$2,326
$3,352
$13,043
$7,726
$0
$0
$5,641
$12,730
$40,950
$0
$0
$7,051
$14,384
$46,712
$0
$0
$8,813
$15,582
$50,978
$333
$1,118
$1,904
$1,904
$1,904
$1,414
$2,767
$3,627
$2,975
$19,599
Represents that portion of the maximum calculated fee for each respective county that is actually charged. Fees may have been lowered through indexing or policy discounts. Does not account for moratoriums/suspensions
Du = dwelling unit
Source: Appendix D, Table D-1
Source: Hillsborough County Department of Development Services; Average of 10 Impact Fee Zones
Source: Pasco County Central Planning Department
Source: Polk County Planning and Development
Source: Pinellas County Building Services; General County Fees
25
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table 7b
Mobility Fee Comparison (continued)
(2)
Land Use
Unit
No Sales Tax
(3)
Date of Last Update

(1)
Assessed Portion of Calculated

Residential:
Single Family Detached (2,000 sq ft)
Non-Residential:
Light Industrial
Office (50,000 sq ft)
Retail (125,000 sq ft)
Bank w/Drive-In
Fast Food w/Drive-Thru
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Hillsborough County
1/2% Sales Tax
(4)
(5)
(7)
(6)
Urban
2016
Rural
2016
Urban
2016
Rural
2016
100%
100%
100%
100%
Manatee
Hernando
(8)
(9)
Citrus
(10)
Orange
(11)
Collier
(12)
Existing
County
County
County
County
County
1985
2011
2013
2014
2012
2015
100%
100%
44%
50%
56%
100%
du
$6,442
$9,295
$4,968
$7,821
$1,475
$3,981
$2,537
$1,697
$3,830
$7,017
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
$4,086
$9,083
$10,242
$21,582
$71,802
$5,909
$13,136
$12,269
$25,846
$86,174
$3,128
$6,946
$7,479
$15,816
$51,682
$4,951
$10,999
$9,506
$20,080
$66,054
$994
$2,326
$3,352
$13,043
$7,726
$776
$1,823
$7,152
$7,152
$7,152
$1,611
$3,031
$3,769
$8,514
$34,795
$584
$1,687
$1,248
$1,248
$1,248
$2,126
$5,474
$5,362
$11,288
$37,636
$5,373
$9,661
$13,531
$27,300
$91,028
Represents that portion of the maximum calculated fee for each respective county that is actually charged. Fees may have been lowered through indexing or policy discounts. Does not account for moratoriums/suspensions
Du = dwelling unit
Source: Hillsborough County Department of Development Services; Average of 10 Impact Fee Zones
Source: Manatee County Impact Fee Administration; Residential impact fee is average of three bedroom options
Source: Hernando County Development Department; Fees currently suspended through February 29, 2016
Source: Citrus County Planning and Development Department; County-wide rates; Fees currently suspended through January 13, 2017
Source: Orange County Planning and Development; Average of AMA and Non-AMA districts
Source: Collier County Impact Fee Administration
26
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Benefit District Analysis
Currently, Hillsborough County has 10 transportation impact fee assessment zones, as
outlined in Article 9, Section A.17 of the Hillsborough County Consolidated Impact
Assessment Program Ordinance (see Map 1). These assessment zones also serve as the
Countys impact fee benefit zones. Assessment zones dictate the amount of the impact fee
charged to each new development while the benefit zones dictate where impact fee revenues
can be spent to ensure that fee payers receive the associated benefit. Typically, boundaries
for benefit districts are based on land uses, growth rates, major roadway boundaries, and
major geographical/environmental boundaries.
In recent years, Counties have started to transition to impact/mobility fee programs with
fewer benefit districts, with many having no more than three districts. Fewer districts creates
a simpler administrative process and also creates larger pools of money that can be used to
fund large-scale improvements in a shorter time-frame than if there were many small districts
while still meeting the legal requirement of dual-rational nexus.
As part of this mobility fee study, the existing transportation impact fee zones were reviewed
to determine if a realignment was needed as the County shifts to a mobility fee. This review
included a review of the historical impact fee revenue collections by district in addition to the
following factors:
Preservation (non-developable) land to identify the Countys activity areas
Natural geographic boundaries (i.e, rivers, lakes)
Urban Services Area (USA) Boundary
Municipal boundaries
Location of roadway improvements in the Countys 5-year plan
Location of roadway improvements in the Countys long range transportation plan
Intra/Inter-district and regional travel patterns
Map 2 illustrates the five mobility fee benefit districts recommended for Hillsborough County.
These recommended districts strike a balance between creating larger revenue pools to get
projects funded while still proving benefit to the fee payers within the district.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
27
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Map 1: Transportation Impact Fee Benefit Zones
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
28
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Map 2: Recommended Mobility Fee Benefit Districts
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
29
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table 8 provides a summary of the inter- and intra-district travel characteristics of the five
proposed mobility fee districts. This summary includes travel between the proposed districts
and the cities of Tampa, Temple Terrace, and Plant City.
District 1 45% of the travel stays within the district and 48% goes into Tampa
District 2 46% of the travel stays within the district and 29% goes into Tampa
District 3 30% of the travel stays within the district, 25% goes into Plant City, and
23% goes into District 2
District 4 49% of the travel stays within the district and 21% goes into District 3
District 5 25% of the travel stays within the district and 41% goes into District 5
Table 8
Travel between Mobility Benefit Districts (including Cities)
District:
District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5
District 1
592,692
57,411
13,250
13,705
3,517
D1 % County
44.6%
4.4%
3.1%
2.1%
2.3%
Avg Trip Length
3.93
14.31
19.24
28.93
36.44
District 2
57,411 598,701
98,244 136,792
21,736
D3 % County
4.3%
45.7%
23.1%
20.8%
14.3%
Avg Trip Length
14.31
3.98
9.07
12.54
18.37
District 3
13,250
98,244 126,191
9,690
4,234
D4 % County
1.0%
7.5%
29.6%
1.5%
2.8%
Avg Trip Length
19.24
9.07
3.91
24.66
23.84
District 4
13,705 136,792
9,690 323,719
62,330
D5 % County
1.0%
10.4%
2.3%
49.3%
41.1%
Avg Trip Length
28.93
12.54
24.66
4.06
8.26
District 5
3,517
21,736
4,234
62,330
37,295
D6 % County
0.3%
1.7%
1.0%
9.5%
24.6%
Avg Trip Length
36.44
18.37
23.84
8.26
2.74
City/County: District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5
Plant City
2,358
19,340 106,764
4,207
3,037
PC % County
0.2%
1.5%
25.1%
0.6%
2.0%
Avg Trip Length
27.37
14.36
5.06
27.89
22.67
Tampa/TT
632,003 373,355
66,518 105,037
19,162
T/TT % County
47.5%
28.5%
15.6%
16.0%
12.6%
Avg Trip Length
7.56
10.05
17.29
21.34
27.81
Hillsb. County 1,329,587 1,309,832 426,163 656,403 151,503
Total % County
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Avg Trip Length
6.67
7.86
8.66
10.00
12.24
Source: TBRPM 8.0, 2040 Cost Affordable Alternative, April, 2015
Mobility Fee District 1

District 1 shows a clear separation from the rest of the unincorporated County with the City
of Tampa acting as a divider. As shown in Table 8, approximately 47 percent of the traffic
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
30
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
stays within the District 1 boundaries and approximately 48 percent travels into the City of
Tampa. The Urban Service Area was considered in the creation of this district, but travel
patterns did not support breaking out the portion outside the USA into a separate district.
Mobility Fee Districts 2 and 3
Districts 2 and 3 are comprised of the northeastern portion of the County with the Urban
Service Area serving as the boundary between the districts. To the south, both districts are
bordered by the Alafia River, creating a geographical barrier between the north and south
portions of the unincorporated County. For District 2, travel patterns indicated a heavy
volume of intra-district trips, as well as travel towards the City of Tampa. Travel in District 3
was split between intra-district trips and travel to District 2 and Plant City.
With future improvements being focused within the Urban Service Area, this boundary was
recommended as a divider to create these two districts. Fee payers within District 2 will
benefit from these improvements as will the large volume of District 3 fee payers that travel
into District 2. However, District 2 fee payers will not directly benefit from future
improvements in District 3 as only a small volume of traffic travels from District 2 to District
3.
Mobility Fee Districts 4 and 5
Districts 4 and 5 are comprised of the southeastern portion of the County with the Urban
Service Area serving as the boundary between the districts. To the north, both districts are
bordered by the Alafia River, creating a geographical barrier between the north and south
portions of the unincorporated County. For District 4, travel patterns indicated a heavy
volume of intra-district trips, as well as travel towards District 2. Travel in District 5 was
primarily headed west into the USA (District 4).
Similar to Districts 2 and 3, future improvements are being focused within the Urban Service
Area and this boundary was recommended as a divider to create these two districts. Fee
payers in both Districts 4 and 5 benefit from improvements within District 4, but only fee
payers in District 5 directly benefit from improvements in District 5.
It is recommended that the County monitor the effectiveness of the five district layout with
regard to mobility fee collection distribution, planned projects, and future travel patterns.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
31
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Appendix A
Demand Component Calculations
DRAFT
Demand Component
This appendix presents the detailed calculations for the demand component of the mobility
fee update.
Interstate & Toll Facility Discount Factor
Table A-1 presents the interstate and toll facility discount factor used in the calculation of the
mobility fee. This variable is based on data from the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Model,
specifically the 2040 projected vehicle-miles of travel, accounting for roadway improvements
included in the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. It should be noted that discount factor
excludes all external-to-external trips, which represent traffic that goes through Hillsborough
County, but does not necessarily stop in the county. This traffic is excluded from the analysis
since it does not come from development within the county. The I/T discount factor is used
to reduce the VMT that the mobility fee charges for each land use.
Table A1
Interstate/Toll Facility Adjustment Factor
Roadway
Interstate/Toll Facilities
Other Roads
Total (All Roads)
Total (Interstate/Toll Roads)
VMT
% VMT
(2040)
16,686,380
36.6%
28,866,343
63.4%
45,552,723 100.0%
16,686,380
36.6%
Source: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Model (TBRPM) v8.0,

base year 2010, future year CA_2040 (TBRPM_v8.0_20150416)
Excludes EE Travel
Single Family Residential Trip Generation Rate Tiering

As part of this study, the single family residential trip generation rate tiering was included to
reflect a three-tier analysis to ensure equity by the size of a home. To facilitate this, an
analysis was completed on the comparative relationship between housing size and household
travel behavior. In addition, an analysis was completed on the travel behavior of low income
households. This analysis utilized data from the 2009 National Household Travel Survey
(NHTS) and the 2013 American Housing Survey (AHS) to examine overall trip-making
characteristics of households in the United States.
Table A-2 presents the trip characteristics being utilized in the proposed mobility fee schedule
for the single family (detached) land use. The 2009 NHTS database was used to assess
average annual household vehicle miles of travel (VMT) for various annual household income
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
A-1
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
levels. In addition, the 2013 AHS database was used to compare median annual
family/household incomes with housing unit size. It is important to recognize that the use of
the income variable in each of these databases is completed simply to provide a convenient
linking mechanism between household VMT from the NHTS and housing unit size from the
AHS.
Table A2
Calculated Single Family Trip Characteristics
Calculated Values Excluding
Tiering
Single Family (Detached)
Assessable
Daily VMT
Trip Length
7.81
6.62
51.70
Trip Rate
Ratio to
Mean
1.00
Source: Florida Studies for LUC 210 included in this Appendix
The results of the NHTS and AHS analyses are included in Tables A-3 through A-5. First, the
data shown in Table A-3 presents the average income in the U.S. for families/households
living in the three housing tiers. As shown, the average income for housing units between
1,500 and 2,499 square feet in size ($66,398) is higher than the overall average income for
the U.S. ($56,993). Table A-3 presents the median household income levels for low and very
low income levels in Hillsborough County. Next, as shown in Table A-4, annual average
household VMT was calculated from the NHTS database for a number of different income
levels and ranges related to the resulting AHS income data from Table A-3 and the
Hillsborough County SHIP definitions for low income (<$47,200) and very low income
($<29,500).
Table A3
Annual Income by Housing Size
2013 AHS Average Income
Data by Housing Size
Less than 1,500 sf
1,500 to 2,499 sf
2,500 sf or more
Average of All Houses
Annual
(1)
Income
$44,243
$66,398
$80,449
$56,993
Source: American Housing Survey for the United States in 2013

1) Weighted average of annual income for each tier
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
A-2
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table A4
Hillsborough County SHIP Definitions
HIllsborough County SHIP Definitions
Median Income
Low Income
$59,000
(1)
Very Low Income
$47,200
(2)
$29,500
Source: Florida Housing Finance Corporation,

2015 Income Limits; SHIP (4 person household)
1) Defined as 80% of the median income
2) Defined as 50% of the median income
To calculate a corresponding trip rate for the new tiers it was necessary to rely on
comparative ratios. As an example, consider the $44,243 annual income category. First, it
was determine that the average annual household VMT for this income level is 19,856 miles.
This figure was then compared to the overall average annual VMT per household in the U.S.
and normalized to the average of the $56,993 (23,455 miles) category to derive a ratio of
0.782 as shown in Table A-5.
Next, the normalized ratio was applied to the daily VMT for the average single family housing
unit size (less than 1,500 sf) to generate a daily VMT of 40.43 for the new tier, as shown in
Table A-6. This daily VMT figure was then divided by the proposed assessable trip length of
6.62 miles to obtain a typical trip rate of 6.11 trips per day.
Table A5
NHTS Annual VMT by Income Category
2009 NHTS Travel Data by
Annual HH Income
Average of $14,750
Average of $23,600
Average of $44,243
Total (All Homes)
Average of $66,398
Average of $80,449
Annual
VMT/HH
8,513
12,883
19,856
23,455
25,397
28,461
Days
Daily VMT
365
365
365
365
365
365
23.32
35.30
54.40
64.26
69.58
77.98
Ratio to Normalized
Mean
to 0.995
0.363
0.335
0.549
0.507
0.847
0.782
1.000
1.083
1.000
1.214
1.121
Source: 2009 National Household Travel Survey Database, Federal Highway Administration
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
A-3
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table A6
Trip Generation Rate by Single Family Land Use Tier
Estimation of Trip Rate by Tier
Trip Rate

Less than 1,500 sf & Very Low Income
Less than 1,500 sf & Low Income
Less than 1,500 sf
1,500 to 2,499 sf
2,500 sf or larger
(1)
Assessable
(2)
Trip Length
2.62
3.96
6.11
7.81
8.76
Daily
Ratio to
(3)
VMT
6.62
6.62
6.62
6.62
6.62
17.32
26.21
40.43
51.70
57.96
(4)
Mean
0.335
0.507
0.782
1.000
1.121
1) Daily VMT (Item 3) divided by assessable trip length (Item 2) for each tiered single family land use
category
2) Source: Table A-2
3) Ratio to the mean (Item 4) divided by total daily VMT for the 1,500 to 2,499 sf tier for each tiered
single family land use category
Table A-7 illustrates the impact that the incorporation of the trip generation rate tiers for the
single family (detached) land use have on the Countys calculated mobility fee schedule.
Table A7
Net Mobility Fee by Single Family Land Use Tier
Impact of Tiering on Fee Schedule
Trip Rate

Less than 1,500 sf & Very Low Income
Less than 1,500 sf & Low Income
Less than 1,500 sf
1,500 to 2,499 sf
2,500 sf or larger
(1)
2.62
3.96
6.11
7.81
8.76
Assessable
Trip Length
6.62
6.62
6.62
6.62
6.62
Daily VMT Net Fee (2)

17.32
26.21
40.43
51.70
57.96
$2,172
$3,272
$5,039
$6,461
$7,244

2) Source: Appendix D, Table D-1
Multi-Family Residential Trip Generation Rate Tiering

Similar to the single family residential land use, low income and very low income tiers
were developed for the multi-family residential (apartment) land uses in Hillsborough
County. Tables A-8 through A-15 detail these calculations for both the Multi-Family (1-2
stories) and the Multi-Family (3+ stories) land uses.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
A-4
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table A8
Calculated MultiFamily (12 Stories) Trip Characteristics
Calculated Values Excluding Tiering
Assessable
Daily VMT
Trip Length
6.60
5.10
33.66
Trip Rate
Multi-Family; 1-2 Stories
Ratio to
Mean
1.00
Table A9
2009 NHTS Travel Data by Annual HH
Annual
Ratio to Normalized
Days
Daily VMT
Income
VMT/HH
Mean
to 0.995
Average of $14,750
8,513
365
23.32
0.360
0.360
Average of $23,600
12,883
365
35.30
0.545
0.545
Average of $59,000
23,636
365
64.76
1.000
1.000
Table A10
Trip Generation Rate by MultiFamily (12 Stories) Income Level
Trip Rate

Very Low Income
Low Income
1)
2)
3)
4)
(1)
Assessable
(2)
Trip Length
2.38
3.60
6.60
5.10
5.10
5.10
Daily
Ratio to
(3)
VMT
12.12
18.34
33.66
(4)
Mean
0.360
0.545
1.000
Daily VMT (Item 3) divided by assessable trip length (Item 2)

Source: Table A-8
Ratio to the mean (Item 4) divided by total daily VMT for the standard multi-family
Source: Table A-9
Table A11
Net Mobility Fee by MultiFamily (12 Stories) Income Level
Trip Rate

Very Low Income
Low Income
(1)
2.38
3.60
6.60
Assessable
Trip Length
5.10
5.10
5.10

12.12
18.34
33.66
$1,513
$2,285
$4,173

Tindale Oliver
March 2016
A-5
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table A12
Calculated MultiFamily (3+ Stories) Trip Characteristics
Calculated Values Excluding Tiering
Assessable
Daily VMT
Trip Length
4.14
5.10
21.11
Trip Rate
Multi-Family; 3+ Stories
Ratio to
Mean
1.00
Table A13
2009 NHTS Travel Data by Annual HH
Annual
Ratio to Normalized
Days
Daily VMT
Income
VMT/HH
Mean
to 0.995
Average of $14,750
8,513
365
23.32
0.360
0.360
Average of $23,600
12,883
365
35.30
0.545
0.545
Average of $59,000
23,636
365
64.76
1.000
1.000
Table A14
Trip Generation Rate by MultiFamily (3+ Stories) Income Level
Trip Rate
Very Low Income
Low Income
1)
2)
3)
4)
(1)
Assessable
(2)
Trip Length
1.49
2.25
4.14
5.10
5.10
5.10
Daily
Ratio to
(3)
VMT
7.60
11.50
21.11
(4)
Mean
0.360
0.545
1.000
Daily VMT (Item 3) divided by assessable trip length (Item 2)

Source: Table A-12
Ratio to the mean (Item 4) divided by total daily VMT for the standard multi-family
Source: Table A-13
Table A15
Net Mobility Fee by MultiFamily (3+ Stories) Income Level
Trip Rate
Very Low Income
Low Income
(1)
1.49
2.25
4.14
Assessable
Trip Length
5.10
5.10
5.10

7.60
11.50
21.11
$945
$1,421
$2,612

Tindale Oliver
March 2016
A-6
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Travel Demand Reductions
Studies show that mixed-use developments tend to generate fewer trips due to such factors
as density, diversity, design, distance, destination, and demand of the mix of land uses.
An analysis of potential trip reduction factors for mixed-use developments was conducted as
part of the Mobility Fee update. ITE Handbook provides information on the impact of internal
capture when multiple land uses are co-located. Using Tables 7.1 and 7.2 from the ITE 8th
Edition Handbook, the total trip generation and internal capture trips were estimated for
mixed-use developments. As shown in Table A-16, four example developments were
analyzed to illustrate the range of potential trip generation rate reductions:
Scenario #1 Even distribution between residential, retail, and office trips
Scenario #2 2/3 residential trips, 1/6 retail trips, 1/6 office trips
As shown in Table A-16, the internal capture reductions range from five (5) percent to 16
percent, depending on the ratio of development units of residential, retail, and office land
uses. The Countys Land Development Code includes information on the Countys current
definitions and policies regarding mixed use development. Prior to granting any mobility fee
discounts, it would be beneficial for Hillsborough County to expand on the current definitions
and address spacing and other physical characteristics as well as mix of uses needed for
developments to qualify for a mixed-use travel demand reduction as it relates to the mobility
fee.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
A-7
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table A16
MixedUse Trip Generation Reductions
Size of
Development
Land Use
Unit
Daily Trips
% of Total
Trips
Scenario #1
Residential
1,000 du
8,735
33.3%
Retail
150,000 sq ft
8,839
33.7%
Office
1,200,000 sq ft
8,677
33.1%
Total Gross Trips

Internal Capture
26,251
(1)
-2,562
23,689
Total Gross External Trips

Scenario #2: Residential
Residential
2,000 du
16,528
63.0%
Retail
50,000 sq ft
4,328
16.5%
Office
500,000 sq ft
4,461
17.0%
25,317
Total Gross Trips

Internal Capture
(2)
-1,260
Residential
5.0%
24,057

Scenario #3: Retail
300 du
2,886
11.0%
Retail
200,000 sq ft
10,656
40.6%
Office
300,000 sq ft
3,026
11.5%
16,568
Total Gross Trips

Internal Capture
(3)
-2,718

Scenario #4: Office
Residential
16.4%
13,850
500 du
4,617
17.6%
Retail
50,000 sq ft
4,328
16.5%
Office
3,000,000 sq ft
17,411
66.3%
26,356
Total Gross Trips

Internal Capture
(4)
-1,308

1)
2)
3)
4)
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
9.8%
5.0%
25,048
Source: Table A-17

Source: Table A-18
Source: Table A-19
Source: Table A-20
A-8
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table A17
Daily Internal Capture Matrix (Scenario #1)
Land
Use
for Trip
Generation
Purposes
Daily
Trip
Generation
(1)
Office
In
(2)
Out
(1)
Retail
In
(2)
Out
(1)
Residential
In
(2)
Out
(1)
Total
In
(2)
Out
Office
In
Retail
Out
In
Out
Residential
In
Out
4,339 4,339 4,420 4,420 4,368 4,368

4,339
133
0
4,339
177
4,420
4,420
87
177
486
4,368
87
4,368
575
619
486
573
398
13,126
26,251
133
264
398
133
Internal
Capture
Reduction
Total
398
Internal Capture =
4.6%
13.5%
11.1%
2,562
13,126
1) Daily trip generation by land use (Table A-16) divided by 2 (50% in, 50% out)
Table A18
Land
Use
for Trip
Generation
Purposes
Daily
Trip
Generation
(1)
Office
In
(2)
Out
(1)
Retail
In
(2)
Out
(1)
Residential
In
(2)
Out
(1)
Total
In
(2)
Out
Office
In
Retail
Out
In
Out
Residential
In
Out
2,231 2,231 2,164 2,164 2,164 2,164

2,231
65
0
2,231
87
2,164
2,164
238
45
238
195
6,559
13,117
65
132
195
65
2,164
2,164
45
87
Internal
Capture
Reduction
Total
282
303
283
195
Internal Capture =
4.4%
13.5%
11.0%
1,260
6,559
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
A-9
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table A19
Land
Use
for Trip
Generation
Purposes
Daily
Trip
Generation
(1)
Office
In
(2)
Out
(1)
Retail
In
(2)
Out
(1)
Residential
In
(2)
Out
(1)
Total
In
(2)
Out
Office
In
Retail
Out
In
Out
Residential
In
Out
1,513 1,513 5,328 5,328 1,443 1,443

1,513
160
0
1,513
213
5,328
5,328
30
213
476
1,443
30
1,443
693
636
476
506
480
8,284
16,568
160
243
480
160
Internal
Capture
Reduction
Total
480
Internal Capture =
13.3%
12.5%
34.2%
2,718
8,284
Table A20
Land
Use
for Trip
Generation
Purposes
Daily
Trip
Generation
(1)
Office
In
(2)
Out
(1)
Retail
In
(2)
Out
(1)
Residential
In
(2)
Out
(1)
Total
In
(2)
Out
8,706
Office
In
Retail
Out
87
2,164
In
238
69
238
195
13,178
26,356
65
156
195
65
Internal
Capture
Reduction
Total
Out
69
87
2,309
2,309
Out
8,706 8,706 2,164 2,164 2,309 2,309

65
0
8,706
2,164
In
Residential
282
303
307
195
Internal Capture =
1.3%
13.5%
10.9%
1,308
13,178
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
A-10
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database
The Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database includes over 200 studies on 40 different
residential and non-residential land uses collected over the last 25 years. Data from these
studies include trip generation, trip length, and percent new trips for each land use. This
information has been used in the development of impact/multi-modal/mobility fees and the
creation of land use plan category trip characteristics for communities throughout Florida and
the U.S.
Tindale Oliver estimates trip generation rates for all land uses in a mobility fee schedule using
data from studies in the Florida Studies Database and the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation reference report (9th edition). In instances, when both ITE
Trip Generation reference report (9th edition) and Florida Studies trip generation rate (TGR)
data are available for a particular land use, the data is typically blended together to increase
the sample size and provide a more valid estimate of the average number of trips generated
per unit of development. If no Florida Studies data is available, only TGR data from the ITE
reference report is used in the fee calculation.
The trip generation rate for each respective land use is calculated using machine counts that
record daily traffic into and out of the site studied. The traffic count hoses are set at
entrances to residential subdivisions for the residential land uses and at all access points for
non-residential land uses.
The trip length information is obtained through origin-destination surveys that ask
respondents where they came from prior to arriving at the site and where they intended to
go after leaving the site. The results of these surveys were used to estimate average trip
length by land use.
The percent new trip variable is based on assigning each trip collected through the origindestination survey process a trip type (primary, secondary, diverted, and captured). The
percent new trip variable is then calculated as 1 minus the percentage of trips that are
captured. Tindale Oliver has published an article entitled, Measuring Travel Characteristics
for Transportation Impact Fees, ITE Journal, April 1991 on the data collecting methodology
for trip characteristics studies.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
A-11
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
MiniWarehouse (ITE LUC 151)
Location
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Total Size
ITE
Blended total
Size (1,000 sf)

107.0
89.6
84.7
93.0
77.0
451.3
784.0
1,235.3
Date
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
5
14
Trip Gen Rate
Time Period Trip Length
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
1.45
1.23
1.39
1.51
2.18
Average Trip Length:
n/a
Weighted Average Trip Length:
n/a
Weighted Percent New Trip Average:
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate:
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate:
Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate:
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
1.53
2.50
2.15
SingleFamily Detached Housing (ITE LUC 210)

Location
Gwinnett Co, GA
Gwinnett Co, GA
Sarasota Co, FL
Sarasota Co, FL
Sarasota Co, FL
Sarasota Co, FL
Sarasota Co, FL
Sarasota Co, FL
Sarasota Co, FL
Sarasota Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Citrus Co, FL
Citrus Co, FL
Citrus Co, FL
Citrus Co, FL
Citrus Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Total Size
Size / Units
76
79
135
152
193
97
282
393
76
128
232
301
135
142
150
215
257
345
368
383
441
1,169
90
400
49
52
126
55
60
70
74
189
102
105
124
132
133
111
231
306
364
374
42
51
59
90
239
232
95
90
58
74
97
315
42
10,380
Date
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
12/13-18/92
12/13-18/92
Jun-93
Jun-93
Jun-93
Jun-93
Jun-93
Jun-93
Jun-93
Jun-93
May-96
May-96
May-96
May-96
Oct-97
Oct-97
Oct-97
Oct-97
Oct-97
Oct-97
Oct-97
Oct-97
Oct-97
Oct-97
Dec-99
Dec-99
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
Oct-03
Oct-03
Oct-03
Oct-03
Oct-03
Dec-06
Dec-06
Dec-06
Dec-06
Dec-06
Apr-07
Apr-07
Apr-07
Apr-07
Mar-08
Mar-08
Mar-08
Mar-08
55
70
86
75
63
123
33
146
207
148
205
182
264
230
245
160
158
225
161
152
516
195
348
91
389
170
212
217
133
106
188
188
261
167
169
170
171
209
273
155
146
345
248
122
346
144
194
385
516
256
338
153
503
512
1,347
314
13,130
70
86
75
63
123
33
146
207
148
205
182
264
-
Trip Gen Rate
5.80
5.40
10.03
9.77
8.05
8.55
6.85
13.20
6.61
7.76
10.01
9a-6p
8.17
9a-6p
7.24
9a-6p
8.93
9a-6p
5.30
9a-5p
5.20
9a-5p
5.00
9a-5p
7.60
9a-5p
7.60
9a-5p
7.00
9a-5p
6.60
9a-5p
8.40
9a-5p
8.20
9a-5p
6.10
9a-5p
12.80
8a-6p
7.80
8a-6p
6.70
7a-6p
10.00
7a-6p
8.50
7a-6p
6.80
8a-6p
7.73
8a-6p
7.80
8a-6p
8.18
8a-6p
7.46
8a-6p
8.02
7a-6p
7.23
7a-6p
6.04
7a-6p
7.87
7a-6p
8.04
7a-6p
8.66
7a-6p
5.71
7a-6p
8.40
7a-6p
7.20
7a-6p
12.30
7a-6p
11.26
18.22
12.07
9.12
7.58
8.02
7a-6p
8.08
7a-6p
7.13
7a-6p
6.16
7a-6p
12.81
7a-6p
8.78
7a-6p
6.97
7a-6p
9.55
7a-6p
Note: Georgia studies are not included in summary statistics.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Time Period
A-12
Trip Length
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
5.40
N/A
31.32
6.10
N/A
32.94
6.00
N/A
60.18
4.40
N/A
42.99
5.90
N/A
47.50
7.30
N/A
62.42
4.60
N/A
31.51
3.00
N/A
39.60
8.40
N/A
55.52
5.40
N/A
41.90
4.85
N/A
48.55
6.03
N/A
49.27
5.04
N/A
36.49
3.28
N/A
29.29
7.90
N/A
41.87
4.10
N/A
21.32
10.80
N/A
54.00
4.60
N/A
34.96
7.40
N/A
56.24
6.60
N/A
46.20
5.70
N/A
37.62
5.00
N/A
42.00
4.70
N/A
38.54
8.00
N/A
48.80
11.40
N/A
145.92
6.40
N/A
49.92
10.20
N/A
68.34
7.60
N/A
76.00
8.30
N/A
70.55
8.12
N/A
55.22
8.75
N/A
67.64
6.03
N/A
47.03
5.95
N/A
48.67
8.99
N/A
67.07
5.10
N/A
40.90
7.22
N/A
52.20
7.29
N/A
44.03
7.00
N/A
55.09
4.92
N/A
39.56
7.70
N/A
66.68
4.82
N/A
27.52
3.94
N/A
33.10
9.14
N/A
65.81
6.88
N/A
84.62
5.56
N/A
62.61
9.46
N/A
172.36
10.79
N/A
130.24
5.78
N/A
52.71
8.93
N/A
67.69
8.16
N/A
65.44
5.88
N/A
47.51
5.86
N/A
41.78
8.39
N/A
51.68
3.05
N/A
39.07
11.29
N/A
99.13
6.55
N/A
45.65
10.98
N/A
104.86
6.79
6.62
Street Smarts
Street Smarts
Sarasota County
Sarasota County
Sarasota County
Sarasota County
Sarasota County
Sarasota County
Sarasota County
Sarasota County
Tindale-Oliver & Associates
Kimley-Horn & Associates
7.81
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
MultiFamily/Apartment and Residential Condo/Townhouse (ITE LUC 220/230)
Location
Sarasota Co, FL
Sarasota Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Total Size
Total Size (TL)
Size / Units
Date
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
212
243
214
240
288
480
500
250
157
169
226
312
176
31
128
229
248
Jun-93
Jun-93
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
Dec-06
Dec-06
Dec-06
Dec-06
Apr-07
Apr-07
May-96
May-96
Apr-02
Apr-02
42
36
175
174
175
175
170
135
265
212
301
456
332
31
128
198
353
42
36
175
174
175
175
170
135
265
31
128
198
353
4,103
3,631
Total Size
ITE
Blended total
3,467
18,480
21,947
LUC 230 Studies are highlighted

Total Size
636
ITE
10,024
Blended total
10,660
Trip Gen Rate
5.78
5.84
6.84
6.96
5.66
5.73
5.46
6.71
13.97
8.09
6.74
4.09
5.38
6.12
9a-6p
6.47
9a-6p
4.77
9a-6p
4.24
9a-6p
5.20
4.61
3.43
5.55
6.88
5.94
5.33
2.62
6.00
2.17
5.95
5.24
4.98
5.18
3.53
4.84
5.10
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
30.06
31.53
23.87
31.41
39.42
32.43
35.76
36.60
48.54
14.63
24.34
28.19
30.48
33.51
14.97
Sarasota County
Sarasota County
13
88

LUC 220: MultiFamily

6.31
6.65
6.60
4
56

LUC 230: Condo/Townhouse

4.97
5.81
5.76
MultiFamily/Apartment; 3+ Stories (ITE LUC 222/223)

ITE
ITE
435
120
555
High-Rise Apartment:
Mid-Rise Apartment:
Blend of ITE Average Trip Generation Rates for HighRise and MidRise Apts:
4.20
3.90
4.14
Mobile Home Park (ITE LUC 240)

Location
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Sarasota Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Sarasota Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Total Size
Size / Units
67
82
137
188
227
235
297
996
1,892
4,121
Date
Jul-91
Jul-91
Jul-91
Apr-02
Apr-02
Jun-93
Apr-02
Jun-93
May-96
9
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
22
58
22
147
173
100
175
181
425
1,303
22
58
22
100
181
425
Trip Gen Rate
Time Period
5.40
48hrs.
10.80
24hr.
3.10
24hr.
3.51
24hr.
2.76
24hr.
3.51
4.78
24hr.
4.19
4.13
9a-6p
Trip Length
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
2.29
N/A
12.37
3.72
N/A
40.18
4.88
N/A
15.13
5.48
N/A
19.23
8.80
N/A
24.29
5.10
N/A
17.90
4.76
N/A
22.75
4.40
N/A
18.44
4.13
N/A
17.06
4.84
4.60

Sarasota County
Sarasota County
4.17
Congregate Care Facility ( ITE LUC 253)

Location
Pinellas Park, FL
Palm Harbor, FL
Total Size
ITE
Blended total
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Size / Units
Date
72
200
Aug-89
Oct-89
272
388
660
460
2
2
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
25
58
83
19
40
Trip Gen Rate
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
3.50
9am-5pm
2.20
79.0
7.70
9am-5pm
3.40
69.0
2.80
3.08
71.6
A-13

3.50
2.02
2.25
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Hotel (ITE LUC 310)
Location
Pinellas Co, FL
Pinellas Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Total Size
ITE
Blended total
Size (Rooms)
Date
174
114
70
211
112
1,495
123
130
1,499
190
123
105
120
1,584
128
174
144
98
106
100
144
Aug-89
Oct-89
-
6,944
4,760
11,704
21
10
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
134
30
164
106
14
-
Trip Gen Rate
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
12.50
7-11a/3-7p
6.30
79.0
62.21
7.30
12-7p
6.20
47.0
21.27
1.85
2.23
2.78
3.50
3.70
4.29
4.69
4.71
4.81
5.25
5.27
5.88
6.10
7.03
7.32
7.32
7.34
7.37
7.66
6.25
6.26
66.3

Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
5.12
8.17
6.36
Motel (ITE LUC 320)

Location
Pinellas Co, FL
Pinellas Co, FL
Pinellas Co, FL
Total Size
ITE
Size (Rooms)
Date
48
54
120
Oct-89
Oct-89
Oct-89
222
2,160
3
10
Total #
Interviews
46
32
26
104
# Trip Length
Interviews
24
22
22
Trip Gen Rate
Percent New
Trips
65.0
69.0
84.6
VMT
Source
10a-2p
2.80
12p-7p
3.80
2p-7p
5.20
3.93
4.34
76.6

5.63
Movie Theater (ITE LUC 444)

Location
Pinellas Co, FL
Pinellas Co, FL
Total Size
ITE
Size (Screens)
8
12
Date
Oct-89
Sep-89
20
10 estimated
30
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
151
122
273
116
116
Trip Gen Rate
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
113.10
2p-8p
2.70
77.0
235.13
63.40
2p-8p
1.90
95.0
114.44
2.30
2.22
87.8
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate (6th):

83.28
153.33
106.63
Health Club (ITE LUC 492)

Location
Tampa, FL
Total Size
ITE
Size (1,000 sf)
Date
Mar-86
15
Total #
Interviews
33
33
# Trip Length
Interviews
31
Percent New
VMT
Trips
7.90
94.0
n/a
Percent New Trip Average:
94.0
Trip Gen Rate

-
Source
32.93
Day Care Center (ITE LUC 565)

Location
Pinellas Co, FL
Pinellas Co, FL
Tampa, FL
Total Size
ITE
Blended total
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Size (1,000 sf)
Date
5.6
10.0
-
Aug-89
Sep-89
Mar-86
15.6
35.0
50.6
2
7
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
94
179
28
301
66
134
25
Trip Gen Rate
Time Period
Trip Length
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
66.99
7a-6p
1.90
70.0
89.10
66.99
7a-6p
2.10
75.0
105.51
2.60
89.0
2.20
2.03
73.2
A-14

66.99
74.06
71.88
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Nursing Home (ITE LUC 620)
Location
Lakeland, FL
Total Size
ITE
Blended total
Size (Beds)
Date
120
Mar-90
120
714
834
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
74
74
66
1
6
Trip Gen Rate
Time Period
Trip Length
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
2.86
11a-4p
2.59
89.0
6.59
2.59
2.59
89.0
2.86
2.74
2.76
Clinic (ITE LUC 630)

Location
Largo, FL
St. Petersburg, FL
Total Size
ITE
Size (1,000 sf)

103.9
103.9
224.0
327.9
Date
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
614
280
894
572
252
Aug-89
Oct-89
1
2
Trip Gen Rate
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
37.03
7a-430p
5.10
93.0
175.63
9a-5p
4.10
90.0
4.60
5.10
93.0

37.03
31.45
33.22
General Office Building (ITE LUC 710)

Location
Sarasota Co, FL
Gwinnett Co, GA
Gwinnett Co, GA
Pinellas Co, FL
St. Petersburg, FL
Total Size
ITE
Size (1,000 sf)

14.3
98.0
180.0
187.0
262.8
742.1
15,522.0
Date
Jun-93
Dec-92
Dec-92
Oct-89
Sep-89
5
78
Total #
Interviews
14
431
291
736
# Trip Length
Interviews
14
388
274
Trip Gen Rate
46.85
11.30
4.30
5.40
3.60
5.90
18.49
7a-5p
6.30
7a-5p
3.40
6.46
5.15
Percent New
Trips
90.0
94.0
VMT
Source
529.41
104.84
-
Sarasota County
Street Smarts
Street Smarts
92.3
MedicalDental Office Building (ITE LUC 720): 10,000 sf or Less

Site
Size
(1,000 sf)
Tues., Jan 11
IN
Wedn., Jan 12
OUT
IN
Thur., Jan 13
OUT
IN
AVERAGE
TOTAL
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
AVERAGE (per 1,000 sf)
OUT
IN
OUT
TOTAL
Collier Co, FL - Site 1
2.100
35
35
22
22
13
13
70
70
23.33
23.33
11.11
11.11
22.22
3.000
40
40
52
52
53
53
145
145
48.33
48.33
16.11
16.11
32.22
2.000
28
28
19
21
24
26
71
75
23.67
25.00
11.84
12.50
24.34
1.000
30
30
52
52
57
57
139
139
46.33
46.33
46.33
46.33
92.66
3.024
31
32
43
43
24
24
98
99
32.67
33.00
10.80
10.91
21.71
1.860
22
24
19
17
11
11
52
52
17.33
17.33
9.32
9.32
18.64
Average
17.59
17.71
35.30
Average (excluding Site 4)
11.84
11.99
23.83
MedicalDental Office Building (ITE LUC 720)

Location
Tampa, FL
Palm Harbor, FL
St. Petersburg, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Citrus Co, FL
Citrus Co, FL
Citrus Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Total Size
ITE
Blended total
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Size (1,000 sf)
Date
14.6
58.4
28.0
11.0
28.0
30.4
38.9
10.0
5.3
50.6
23.5
Mar-86
Oct-89
Nov-89
May-96
May-96
Oct-97
Oct-97
Oct-97
Oct-03
Nov-03
Dec-03
298.6
450.0
748.6
11
10
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
33
104
34
390
202
763
26
76
30
349
189
186
186
324
168
340
20
-
Trip Gen Rate
6.00
33.98
9a-5p
6.30
57.20
9a-4p
1.20
28.52
9a-6p
6.47
49.75
9a-6p
6.06
49.50
9a-5p
4.60
31.00
9a-5p
3.60
39.80
9a-5p
3.30
32.26
8-6p
6.80
40.56
8-630p
6.20
29.36
8-5p
5.25
26.72
16.58
5.07
5.55
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
79.0
73.0
88.0
89.5
93.8
92.1
81.6
83.5
97.1
92.4
95.2
-
156.27
165.09
282.64
209.67
91.04
109.68
213.03
232.33
146.78
-

Orange County
Orange County
88.9
Average Trip Generation Rate:
A-15
32.59
36.13
34.72
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Shopping Center (ITE LUC 820)
Location
Size (1,000 sf)
Tampa, FL
Tampa, FL
Tampa, FL
Tampa, FL
St. Petersburg, FL
St. Petersburg, FL
Largo, FL
Dunedin, FL
Pinellas Park, FL
Seminole, FL
Hillsborough Co, FL
Hillsborough Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Sarasota/Bradenton, FL
Ocala, FL
Gwinnett Co, GA
Gwinnett Co, GA
Sarasota Co, FL
Sarasota Co, FL
Sarasota Co, FL
Sarasota Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Charlotte Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Citrus Co, FL
Citrus Co, FL
Bozeman, MT
Bozeman, MT
Bozeman, MT
Total Size
1,192.0
132.3
425.0
80.5
696.0
425.0
134.0
151.0
109.0
133.4
99.1
314.7
110.0
146.1
157.5
191.0
107.8
88.0
191.9
51.3
67.8
72.3
65.6
75.8
185.0
91.3
104.3
159.9
35.9
5,757.5
Date
Mar-86
Mar-86
Mar-86
Mar-86
Aug-89
Sep-89
Aug-89
Sep-89
Sep-89
Oct-89
Jul-91
Jul-91
Aug-91
Aug-91
Sep-92
Sep-92
Dec-92
Dec-92
Jun-93
Jun-93
Jun-93
Jun-93
May-96
Oct-97
Oct-97
Oct-97
Apr-01
Apr-01
Apr-02
Apr-02
Oct-03
Nov-03
Dec-06
Dec-06
Dec-06
Total #
Interviews
527
170
354
144
384
400
160
276
485
674
68
208
300
300
58
65
57
62
608
246
444
222
134
359
502
329
7,536
# Trip Length
Interviews
348
269
298
368
120
210
388
586
64
154
185
192
58
65
57
62
331
177
376
784
390
359
502
329
Trip Gen Rate
11a-7p
77.00
10a-7p
26.73
10a-6p
81.48
9a-5p
9a-6p
12a-6p
12a-6p
46.00
27.00
122.14
51.53
79.79
66.79
77.60
9a-6p
73.50
9a-5p
72.00
9a-5p
43.00
9a-5p
102.60
65.30
145.64
9a-5p
38.23
9a-5p
55.84
8a-6p
54.50
8a-6p
46.96
56.49
69.30
1.70
2.50
3.60
1.80
2.30
1.40
3.20
1.30
1.30
3.33
2.64
3.20
8.50
3.20
2.80
3.40
5.90
4.68
1.80
2.40
2.70
3.40
4.50
1.46
2.36
2.40
1.60
3.35
1.56
1.39
n/a
n/a
Percent New
Trips
66.0
76.0
78.0
92.0
75.0
76.0
80.0
87.0
74.0
73.0
94.1
74.0
61.6
64.0
70.0
84.0
54.5
57.1
50.9
51.8
71.2
59.0
46.9
58.2
88.1
88.0
49.0
54.0
74.0
VMT
Source
127.51
46.11
86.69
103.04
192.78
197.85
75.56
87.97
60.08
248.37
173.37
99.62
52.52
118.05
76.77
77.08
47.59
71.28

King Engineering Associates, Inc.
King Engineering Associates, Inc.
Street Smarts
Street Smarts
Sarasota County
Sarasota County
Sarasota County
Sarasota County
Figure A1
Retail/Shopping Center (LUC 820) Florida Curve Trip Length Regression
4.00
3.50
Trip Length (Miles)
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Square Footage
Source: Regression analysis based on FL Studies data for LUC 820
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
A-16
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Figure A2
Retail/Shopping Center (LUC 820) Florida Curve Percent New Trips Regression
90%
80%
Percent New Trips
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Square Footage
Source: Regression analysis based on FL Studies data for LUC 820
New/Used Auto Sales (ITE LUC 841)

Location
St.Petersburg, FL
Clearwater, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Total Size
ITE
Blended total
Size (1,000 sf)
Date
43.0
43.0
116.7
99.8
39.1
66.3
46.7
34.4
13.8
Oct-89
Oct-89
-
459.7
570.0
1,029.7
9
15
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
152
136
288
120
106
-
Trip Gen Rate
Time Period
Trip Length
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
9a-5p
4.70
79.0
29.40
9a-5p
4.50
78.0
103.19
22.18
13.45
10.48
28.50
40.34
23.45
35.75
4.60
4.60
78.5

Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
23.22
32.30
28.25
Convenience Market w/Gasoline (ITE LUC 853)

Location
Tampa, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Tampa, FL
Ellenton, FL
Tampa, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Total Size
ITE
Blended Total
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Size (1,000 sf)
Date
1.1
2.1
4.4
2.3
3.3
3.8
2.5
2.5
3.0
Mar-86
Jun-91
Jun-91
Jun-91
Aug-91
Aug-91
10/13-15/92
10/20-22/92
11/10-12/92
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
25.1
30.0
55.1
45.6
9
10
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
72
77
66
85
96
78
239
124
142
87
23
59
1,148
20
24
25
38
16
74
44
23
-
Trip Gen Rate
2.00
544.80
24hr.
0.89
997.60
24hr.
1.67
486.70
48hrs.
1.06
1.19
1.06
24hr.
1.06
24hr.
0.96
24hr.
3.13
719.79
24hr.
1.62
610.46
24hr.
1.77
606.02
24hr.
0.83
1.44
1.51
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
26.0
36.4
29.4
39.6
20.5
31.1
35.3
16.4
32.8
11.7
32.6
126.07
606.42
151.68
322.19
126.61
195.00

27.7
15.6
A-17
639.68
845.60
775.14
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Pharmacy/Drug Store with & without DriveThru (ITE LUC 880 & 881)
Location
Pasco Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Total Size
ITE
Blended total
Size (1,000 sf)
Date
11.1
12.0
15.1
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
38.2
196.0
234.2
3
16
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
138
212
1192
1,542
38
90
54
Trip Gen Rate
88.97
2.05
122.16
2.04
97.96
2.13
2.07
2.08
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
27.5
42.5
28.1
50.23
105.79
58.69

32.4
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate (LUC 880 / 881):
103.03
90.06 / 96.91
95.96
Furniture Store (ITE LUC 890)

Location
Largo, FL
Tampa, FL
Total Size
ITE
Size (1,000 sf)
Date
15.0
16.9
7/28-30/92
Jul-92
31.9
897.0
2
13
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
Trip Gen Rate
64
68
132
34
39
Time Period
Trip Length
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
4.63
52.5
7.38
55.7
6.01
6.09
54.2

5.06
Bank/Savings DriveIn (ITE LUC 912)

Location
Tampa, FL
Tampa, FL
Clearwater, FL
Largo, FL
Seminole, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Total Size
ITE
Blended total
Size (1,000 sf)
Date
0.4
2.0
4.5
2.3
3.1
2.5
5.4
2.4
2.7
Mar-86
Mar-86
Aug-89
Sep-89
Oct-89
Jun-91
Jun-91
Jul-91
Aug-91
Aug-91
Aug-91
May-96
Apr-02
May-02
25.2
21.0
46.2
23.7
9
7
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
77
211
113
129
69
47
57
162
116
142
164
70
50
1,407
52
94
29
32
26
96
54
68
41
-
Trip Gen Rate
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
2.40
54.0
9a-6p
5.20
46.0
1.60
73.0
24hr.
1.33
42.0
24hr.
1.75
68.1
48hrs.
2.70
45.6
24hr.
0.88
59.3
1.58
46.6
2.08
47.9
9a-6p
2.77
24.7
24hr.
3.55
54.6
246.66
24hr.
2.66
40.5
265.44
2.38
2.46
46.2

246.66
148.15
159.34
Quality Restaurant (ITE LUC 931)

Location
Tampa, FL
St. Petersburg, FL
Clearwater, FL
Total Size
ITE
Blended total
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Size (1,000 sf)
Date
7.5
8.0
Mar-86
Oct-89
Oct-89
15.5
135.0
150.5
143.0
2
15
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
76
177
60
313
62
154
40
Trip Gen Rate
Time Period
Trip Length
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
2.10
82.0
11a-2p/4-8p
3.50
87.0
110.63
10a-2p/5-9p
2.80
67.0
207.54
2.80
3.14
76.7
A-18

110.63
89.95
91.10
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
HighTurnover Restaurant (ITE LUC 932)
Location
Hernando Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
St. Petersburg, FL
Kenneth City, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Total Size
ITE
Blended total
Size (1,000 sf)
Date
6.2
8.2
5.0
5.2
5.2
5.8
8.9
11.3
6.7
11.4
11.3
7.2
5.5
9.7
4.6
7.0
9.7
5.0
5.6
7.4
5.9
May-96
May-96
Oct-89
Oct-89
Apr-02
Apr-02
152.8
98.0
250.8
21
14
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
242
154
74
236
114
182
1,102
175
93
68
176
88
102
-
Trip Gen Rate
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
187.51
9a-6p
2.76
72.5
375.00
102.71
9a-6p
4.15
60.2
256.43
132.60
1130-7p
2.00
92.0
243.98
127.88
4p-730p
2.30
75.0
220.59
82.47
9a-6p
3.72
77.2
236.81
116.97
9a-6p
3.49
56.0
228.77
52.69
62.12
82.58
91.67
95.33
98.06
100.18
105.84
129.23
126.40
132.32
135.68
145.59
147.44
147.74
3.07
3.17
70.8

Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
Orange County
109.84
127.15
116.60
Fast Food Restaurant w/Drive Thru (ITE LUC 934)

Location
Tampa, FL
Tampa, FL
Pinellas Co, FL
Pinellas Co, FL
Tarpon Springs, FL
Marion Co, FL
Marion Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Collier Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Hernando Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Lake Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Pasco Co, FL
Orange Co, FL
Total Size
ITE
Blended total
Size (1,000 sf)
Date
2.20
4.30
1.60
4.00
5.43
3.13
2.20
3.20
3.80
2.66
2.96
4.42
8.93
Mar-86
Mar-86
Aug-89
Oct-89
Oct-89
Jun-91
Jun-91
Aug-91
Aug-91
May-96
May-96
Apr-01
Apr-01
Apr-01
Apr-02
Apr-02
Apr-02
48.8
63.0
111.8
34.0
13
21
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
61
306
81
456
233
60
75
66
118
136
168
376
171
188
100
486
168
4,463
48
260
114
32
46
44
40
82
82
252
182
137
46
164
120
-
Trip Gen Rate
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
2.70
65.0
502.80
11a-2p
1.70
59.0
504.31
660.40
1 day
2.30
57.0
865.78
7a-7p
3.60
49.0
962.50
48hrs.
0.91
53.3
466.84
625.00
48hrs.
1.54
61.3
590.01
1.91
66.7
1.17
33.9
311.83
9a-6p
1.68
60.2
315.27
547.34
9a-6p
1.59
48.8
425.04
934.30
2.50
74.6
1742.47
654.90
4.10
47.8
353.70
3.30
70.8
826.38
283.12
9a-6p
5.10
46.0
515.32
9a-6p
2.72
33.7
472.92
759.24
9a-6p
1.89
71.4
1024.99
377.00
2.42
2.05
57.9

Orange County
530.19
496.12
511.00
Automobile Care Center (ITE LUC 942)

Location
Jacksonville, FL
Jacksonville, FL
Jacksonville, FL
Lakeland, FL
Largo, FL
Orange Co, FL
Lakeland, FL
Total Size
ITE
Blended total
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Size (1,000 sf)
Date
2.3
2.3
2.4
5.2
5.5
25.0
-
2/3-4/90
2/3-4/90
2/3-4/90
Mar-90
Sep-89
Nov-92
Mar-90
42.6
102.0
144.6
107.5
6
6
Total #
Interviews
# Trip Length
Interviews
124
110
132
24
34
41
54
519
94
74
87
14
30
39
42
Trip Gen Rate
Time Period
Trip Length
Percent New
Trips
VMT
Source
9a-5p
3.07
76.0
9a-5p
2.96
67.0
9a-5p
2.32
66.0
9a-4p
1.36
59.0
37.64
9a-5p
2.40
88.0
79.50
2-6p
4.60
9a-4p
2.44
78.0
2.74
3.62
72.2
A-19

LCE, Inc.
37.64
31.10
31.43
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Service Station with and w/o Car Wash (ITE LUC 944 & 946)
Location
Largo, FL
Collier County, FL
Total Size
ITE LUC 944 (vfp)
ITE LUC 946 (vfp)
Size (1,000 sf)
Date
0.6
-
Nov-89
Aug-91
0.6
48.0
120.0
1
6
10
Total #
Interviews
70
168
238
# Trip Length
Interviews
14
40
Percent New
VMT
Trips
8am-5pm
1.90
23.0
1.01
23.8
1.46
1.90
23.0
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate - per fuel position (LUC 944):
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate - per fuel position (LUC 946):
Blended ITE Average Trip Generation Rate per fuel position:
Trip Gen Rate
Source
168.56
152.84
157.33
SelfService Car Wash (ITE LUC 947)

Location
Largo, FL
Clearwater, FL
Collier, FL
Collier, FL
Total Size
Total Size (TGR)
ITE
Blended total
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Size (Bays)
Date
10
11
8
Nov-89
Nov-89
Dec-09
Jan-09
29
19
5
24
3
2
1
Total #
Interviews
111
177
304
186
778
# Trip Length
Interviews
84
108
-
Trip Gen Rate
Percent New
Trips
76.0
61.0
57.0
72.0
VMT
Source
8am-5pm
2.00
10am-5pm
1.30
30.24
2.50
22.75
1.96
1.94
2.18
67.7
A-20

27.09
108.00
43.94
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Appendix B
Cost Component Calculation
DRAFT
Cost Component
This appendix presents the detailed calculations for the cost component of the mobility fee
update. Backup data and assumptions are provided for all cost variables, including:
Design
Right-of-Way
Construction
Construction engineering/inspection
Roadway capacity
Transit capital costs
Urban-Design vs. Rural-Design

Due to a lack of available roadway construction data for rural-design roadways, the cost per
lane mile for these types of roads was calculated using an adjustment factor. This factor was
based on the rural-to-urban design cost ratio from the most recent District 7 Long Range
Estimates provided by FDOT. Based on the LRE, the costs for rural-design roadway capacity
expansion (new road construction or lane addition) is approximately 77 percent of the
construction costs for urban-design roadway improvements. For all subsequent tables (for
county and state roadways), costs are presented for urban-design roadways, with the ruraldesign roadway costs being calculated using the cost ratio in Table B-1.
Table B1
Urban/RuralDesign Cost Factor
Improvement
0-2 Lanes
0-4 Lanes
0-6 Lanes
2-4 Lanes
4-6 Lanes
Average
Cost per Lane Mile

Rural Design Urban Design
$2,607,379
$4,013,085
$2,106,777
$2,758,628
$1,773,647
$2,215,237
$2,979,105
$3,581,065
$3,313,993
$4,035,253
$2,556,180
$3,320,654
Ratio
65%
76%
80%
83%
82%
77%
Source: FDOT District 7 Long Range Estimates, 2015
Design
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-1
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
County Roadways
The design cost factor for county roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction
cost per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the design-to-construction
cost ratios from recently completed and bid improvements in Hillsborough County and from
previously completed impact studies throughout Florida. For local county roadways, the
design factors ranged from 3 percent to 32 percent, with a weighted average of 12 percent.
For county roadways from throughout Florida, the design factors ranged from 6 percent to
14 percent with a weighted average of 10 percent. For purposes of this study, the design cost
for county roads was calculated at 10 percent of the construction cost per lane mile based on
the local data, statewide data, and discussions with County staff. See Tables B-10 and B-11
for additional information.
Table B2
Design Cost Adjustment County Roads
Road Type
Design Cost per

Lane Mile
(1)
Section Design
(2)
Distribution
Urban Design
$360,000
Rural Design
$277,000
Weighted Average Design Cost per Lane Mile
85%
15%
Weighted
Design Cost per
(3)
Lane Mile
$306,000
$42,000
$348,000
1) Design cost is estimated at 12% of construction based on local projects (Table B-10)
and recent impact fee studies (Table B-11, Item a)
2) Source: Appendix B, Table B-19, Items c and d
3) Design cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design
weight (Item 2) for each road type and added together
All figure rounded to the nearest $1,000
State Roadways
The design cost factor for state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost
per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the design-to-construction
cost ratios for state road unit costs in previously completed transportation impact studies
throughout Florida. For state roadways, the design factors ranged from 10 percent to 14
percent, with a weighted average of 11 percent. For purposes of this study, the design cost
for state roads was calculated at 11 percent of the construction cost per lane mile. See Table
B-11 for additional information.
Table B3
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-2
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Design Cost Adjustment State Roads
Road Type
Design Cost per

Lane Mile
(1)
Section Design
(2)
Distribution
Urban Design
$330,000
Rural Design
$254,000
Weighted Average Design Cost per Lane Mile
85%
15%
Weighted
Design Cost per
(3)
Lane Mile
$281,000
$38,000
$319,000
1) Design cost is estimated at 11% of construction based on recent impact fee studies
(Table B-11, Item b)
3) Design cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design
Right-of-Way
The ROW cost reflects the total cost of the acquisitions along a corridor that was necessary
to have sufficient cross-section width to widen an existing road or, in the case of new road
construction, build a new road.
County Roadways
For mobility fee purposes, the ROW cost for county roads was estimated as a percentage of
the construction cost per lane mile. To determine the ROW cost factor, Tindale Oliver
conducted a review of recently completed ROW acquisitions and current ROW estimates
along capacity expansion projects in Hillsborough County and also reviewed ROW estimates
from recent transportation impact fee studies from other counties in Florida. For county
roadways in Hillsborough County, the ROW factors ranged from 4 percent to 119 percent,
with a weighted average of 44 percent, as shown in Table B-12. This factor is higher than the
ratio of ROW to construction cost observed in other Florida jurisdictions (41 percent), as
shown in Table B-13, and reflects more urbanized nature of County. Discussion with staff and
a review of the ROW estimates in the Community Transportation Plan indicated that future
ROW acquisitions are expected to be on the higher than recent acquisition costs. For
purposes of this update study, the ROW cost was estimated at 50 percent of the construction
cost per lane mile for county roadways.
Table B4
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-3
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
RightofWay Cost Adjustment County Roads
Road Type
ROW Cost per

Lane Mile
(1)
Section Design
(2)
Distribution
Urban Design
$1,500,000
Rural Design
$1,155,000
Weighted Average ROW Cost per Lane Mile
Weighted ROW
Cost per Lane
(3)
Mile
$1,275,000
$173,000
$1,448,000
85%
15%
1) ROW cost is estimated at 50% of construction based on local projects (Table B-12),
recent impact fee studies (Table B-13, Item a), and discussions with staff
3) ROW cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight
(Item 2) for each road type and added together
State Roadways
Similar to county roads, the ROW cost of state roads was estimated as a percentage of the
construction cost per lane mile. Given the limited data of ROW costs for state roads in
Hillsborough County and based on experience in other jurisdictions, the ROW cost ratio
calculated for county roads was also applied to state roads. Therefore, for purposes of this
update study, the ROW cost for state roads was calculated at 50 percent of the construction
cost per lane mile. See Table B-13 for additional information.
Table B5
RightofWay Cost Adjustment State Roads
Road Type
ROW Cost per

Lane Mile
(1)
Section Design
(2)
Distribution
Urban Design
$1,500,000
Rural Design
$1,155,000
Weighted Average ROW Cost per Lane Mile
85%
15%
Weighted ROW
Cost per Lane
(3)
Mile
$1,275,000
$173,000
$1,448,000
1) ROW cost is estimated at 50% of construction based on local projects (Table B-12),
recent impact fee studies (Table B-13, Item a), and discussions with staff
3) ROW cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight
Construction
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-4
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
County Roadways
A review of construction cost data for recent local county roadway capacity expansion
projects identified 15 improvements in Hillsborough County.
Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Segments A through D
Columbus Drive Ext. from US 301 to Falkenburg Road
Madison Avenue from US 41 to 78th Street
Gunn Highway from Ehrlich Road to South Mobley Road
Bell Shoals Road from Bloomingdale Avenue to Boyette Road
Race Track Road, Phases I through IV
Boyette Road, Phases II and III
Gornto Lake Road Ext. from Brandon Town Center to SR 60
Turkey Creek Rd from MLK Jr. Boulevard to Sydney Road
As shown in Table B-14, these improvements had a weighted average construction cost of
approximately $3.30 million per lane mile. However, this weighted average includes two
segments on Boyette Road which have very high construction costs. Removing these two
improvements from the dataset reduces the average to approximately $3.02 million per lane
mile for urban-design improvements.
In addition to looking at local data, a review of recently bid projects located throughout the
state of Florida was conducted. As shown in Table B-15, a total of 65 projects from 17
different counties were identified with a weighted average cost of approximately $2.15
million per lane mile. When compared to these statewide bids, the local improvements
average a significantly higher average cost per lane mile. Staff indicated that costs in
Hillsborough County and in FDOT District 7, in general, are typically higher than costs
elsewhere in the state.
Based on this review and discussions with staff, a county roadway cost of $3.00 million per
lane mile was used in the mobility fee calculation for county roads with urban-design
characteristics. Table B-6 presents the urban and rural-design costs estimates, as well as the
weighted average cost per lane mile for county roads in Hillsborough County.
Table B6
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-5
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Construction Cost Adjustment County Roads
Road Type
Construction
Cost per Lane
Section Design
(2)
Distribution
(1)
Mile
Urban Design
$3,000,000
85%
Rural Design
$2,310,000
15%
Weighted Average Construction Cost per Lane Mile
Weighted
Constr. Cost per
(3)
Lane Mile
$2,550,000
$347,000
$2,897,000
1) Source: Tables B-14, B-15, and discussions with staff. Rural design is estimated at
77% of urban design costs (see Table B-1)
3) Construction cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design
State Roadways
A review of construction cost data for recent local state roadway capacity expansion projects
identified three (3) improvements in Hillsborough County:
CR 39/Alexander Street from North of I-4 to North of Knights Griffin Road
SR 574 (MLK Jr. Boulevard) from West of Highview Road to East of Parsons Avenue
SR 41 (US 301) from South of Tampa Bypass Canal to North of Fowler Avenue
As shown in Table B-16, these improvements had a weighted average construction cost of
approximately $2.07 million. However, this is heavily influenced by the oldest and longest of
the improvements (CR 39), which was very cheap per lane mile. Looking at only the more
recent improvements, the weighted average construction cost was $4.21 million per lane
mile.
In addition to looking at the local data, a review of recently bid projects located throughout
the state of Florida was conducted. As shown in Table B-16, a total of 70 projects from 34
different counties were identified with a weighted average cost of approximately $3.06
million per lane mile (all improvements are urban-design). The FDOT District 7 Long Range
Estimates were also reviewed (previously presented in Table B-1) and provided an average
construction cost of approximately $3.32 million per lane mile for urban-design projects.
Based on this review and discussions with staff, a state roadway cost of $3.00 million per lane
mile was used in the mobility fee calculation for state roads with urban-design characteristics.
Table B-7 presents the urban and rural-design cost estimates, as well as the weighted average
cost per lane mile for state roads in Hillsborough County.
Table B7
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-6
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Construction Cost Adjustment State Roads
Road Type
Construction
Cost per Lane
Section Design
(2)
Distribution
(1)
Mile
Urban Design
$3,000,000
85%
Rural Design
$2,310,000
15%
Weighted Average Construction Cost per Lane Mile
Weighted
Constr. Cost per
(3)
Lane Mile
$2,550,000
$347,000
$2,897,000
1) Source: Table B-16 and discussions with staff. Rural design is estimated at 77% of
urban design costs (see Table B-1)
3) Cosntruction cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design
Construction Engineering/Inspection
County Roadways
The CEI cost factor for county roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost
per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the CEI-to-construction cost
ratios from recently completed improvements in Hillsborough County and from previously
completed impact studies throughout Florida. For local county roadways, the CEI factors
ranged from 9 percent to 10 percent, with a weighted average of 9 percent. For county
roadways from throughout Florida, the CEI factors ranged from 3 percent to 17 percent with
a weighted average of 9 percent. For purposes of this study, the CEI cost for county roads
was calculated at 9 percent of the construction cost per lane mile based on the local data,
statewide data, and discussions with County staff. See Tables B-17 and B-18 for additional
information.
Table B8
CEI Cost Adjustment County Roads
Road Type
CEI Cost per Lane Section Design

Mile
(1)
(2)
Distribution
Urban Design
$270,000
Rural Design
$208,000
Weighted Average CEI Cost per Lane Mile
85%
15%
Weighted CEI
Cost per Lane
(3)
Mile
$230,000
$31,000
$261,000
1) CEI cost is estimated at 9% of construction based on local projects (Table B-17) and
recent impact fee studies (Table B-18, Item a)
3) CEI cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight
State Roadways
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-7
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
The CEI cost factor for state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per
lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the CEI-to-construction cost ratios
for state road unit costs in previously completed impact studies throughout Florida. For state
roadways, the CEI factors ranged from 8 percent to 17 percent, with a weighted average of
11 percent. For purposes of this study, the CEI cost for state roads was calculated at 11
percent of the construction cost per lane mile. See Table B-18 for additional information.
Table B9
CEI Cost Adjustment State Roads
Road Type
CEI Cost per Lane Section Design

Mile
(1)
(2)
Distribution
Urban Design
$330,000
Rural Design
$254,000
Weighted Average CEI Cost per Lane Mile
85%
15%
Weighted CEI
Cost per Lane
(3)
Mile
$281,000
$38,000
$319,000
1) CEI cost is estimated at 11% of construction based on recent impact fee studies
(Table B-18, Item b)
3) CEI cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-8
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table B10
Design Cost Factor Hillsborough County Local Roadway Improvements
Project ID
61043000
61044000
61045000
61057000
61150000
69106000
69112000
69118000
69119000
69120000
69121000
69123000
69124000
69127000
69625000
Total
Roadway
Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Segment D
Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Segment B/C
Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Segment A
Columbus Dr Ext.
Madison Ave
Gunn Hwy
Bell Shoals Rd
Race Track Rd, Ph. I
Race Track Rd, Ph. II
Race Track Rd, Ph. III
Race Track Rd, Ph. IV
Boyette Rd, Ph. II
Boyette Rd, Ph. III
Gornto Lake Rd Ext.
Turkey Creek Rd
From
To
Pebble Creek
Palm Springs
Bearss Ave
US 301
US 41
Ehrlich Rd
Bloomingdale Ave
Douglas Rd
Countryway Blvd
Linebaugh Ave
Hillsborough Ave
Balm Riverview Rd
Donneymoor Dr
Brandon Town Center
MLK Blvd
Pasco Co. Line

Pebble Creek Dr
Palm Springs
Falkenburg Rd
78th St
S. Mobley Rd
Boyette Rd
Linebaugh Ave
S. Mobley Rd
Countryway Blvd
Douglas Rd
Donneymoor Dr
Bell Shoals Rd
SR 60
Sydney Rd
Start
Date
10/31/2003
10/15/2003
10/31/2003
4/1/2006
10/7/2011
10/15/2001
4/10/2007
4/30/2008
7/16/2004
9/6/2006
5/1/2009
11/22/2006
10/2/2009
8/1/2006
12/1/2014
Status
Feature
Active
Active
Active
Completed
Active
Completed
Active
Completed
Completed
Completed
Active
Completed
Active
Completed
Active
4 to 8 Lanes
4 to 8 Lanes
4 to 8 Lanes
0 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 6 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 6 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
0 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
Section Design
Urban; Curb & Gutter
Design Cost
$4,749,955
$3,552,458
$4,534,978
$851,923
$923,013
$999,745
$780,150
$5,019,295
$4,700,145
$1,400,493
$700,000
$28,212,155
Construction
Designto
Cost
Construction
$14,931,747
32%
$52,249,133
7%
$37,489,099
12%
$7,242,200
12%
$7,000,000
13%
$5,656,000
18%
$24,000,000
3%
$12,187,144
$15,973,286
11%
$12,198,251
$5,375,855
$16,570,837
13%
$20,814,450
$8,656,579
16%
$3,166,000
22%
$243,510,581
12%
Source: Hillsborough County Public Works Department
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-9
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table B11
Design Cost Factor for County and State Roads Recent Impact Fee Studies
Year
County
2006
2006
2006
2006
2007
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
2009
2009
2009
2010
2011
2012
2012
2012
2012
2013
2013
2014
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
Collier
Citrus
Highlands
Marion
Pasco
Lake
Flagler
Volusia
Leon
Sumter
Collier
Polk
Hillsborough/Tampa
Collier
Sarasota/North Port
Osceola
Orange
City of Orlando
City of Sarasota
Hernando
Charlotte
Indian River
Collier
Brevard
Sumter
Marion
Palm Beach
Average
County Roadways (Cost per Lane Mile)

Design
Constr.
Design Ratio
$323,639
$2,558,546
13%
$361,774
$2,584,099
14%
$235,030
$1,678,785
14%
$185,333
$1,941,244
10%
$246,324
$3,079,051
8%
$232,882
$2,911,021
8%
$174,000
$1,740,000
10%
$291,696
$2,651,778
11%
$212,800
$2,660,000
8%
$178,960
$2,237,000
8%
$217,000
$3,100,000
7%
$95,400
$1,590,000
6%
$308,000
$2,800,000
11%
$119,560
$1,708,000
7%
$240,000
$2,400,000
10%
$371,196
$2,651,400
14%
$264,000
$2,400,000
11%
$288,000
$2,400,000
12%
$240,000
$2,400,000
10%
$198,000
$1,980,000
10%
$220,000
$2,200,000
10%
$159,000
$1,598,000
10%
$270,000
$2,700,000
10%
$242,000
$2,023,000
12%
$210,000
$2,100,000
10%
$167,000
$2,668,000
6%
$224,000
$1,759,000
13%
$232,429
$2,315,516
10%
(a)
State Roadways (Cost per Lane Mile)

Design
Constr.
Design Ratio
$349,643
$3,385,978
10%
$400,432
$2,860,227
14%
$347,326
$2,480,900
14%
$154,643
$1,430,919
11%
$427,112
$3,050,799
14%
$318,412
$3,184,125
10%
n/a
$309,526
$3,095,258
10%
$372,130
$3,383,000
11%
$238,000
$2,380,000
10%
$320,000
$3,200,000
10%
$217,000
$2,170,000
10%
$420,000
$3,500,000
12%
$241,800
$2,418,000
10%
$200,000
$2,000,000
10%
$313,258
$2,847,800
11%
n/a
$319,000
$2,900,000
11%
$286,000
$2,600,000
11%
$222,640
$2,024,000
11%
$240,000
$2,400,000
10%
$196,000
$1,776,000
11%
$270,000
$2,700,000
10%
$316,000
$2,875,000
11%
$276,000
$2,505,000
11%
$227,000
$2,060,000
11%
$333,000
$3,029,000
11%
$292,597
$2,650,240
11%
(b)
Source: Recent impact fee studies conducted throughout Florida

Note: Letter references (i.e., a) are used to assist with footnotes and sourcing
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-10
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table B12
RightofWay Cost Factor Hillsborough County Local Roadway Improvements
Project ID
61043000
61044000
61045000
61057000
69106000
69112000
69118000
69119000
69120000
69121000
69123000
69124000
69127000
Total
Roadway
Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Segment D
Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Segment B/C
Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Segment A
Columbus Dr Ext.
Gunn Hwy
Bell Shoals Rd
Race Track Rd, Ph. I
Race Track Rd, Ph. II
Race Track Rd, Ph. III
Race Track Rd, Ph. IV
Boyette Rd, Ph. II
Boyette Rd, Ph. III
Gornto Lake Rd Ext.
From
To
Pebble Creek
Palm Springs
Bearss Ave
US 301
Ehrlich Rd
Bloomingdale Ave
Douglas Rd
Countryway Blvd
Linebaugh Ave
Hillsborough Ave
Balm Riverview Rd
Donneymoor Dr
Brandon Town Center
Pasco Co. Line

Pebble Creek Dr
Palm Springs
Falkenburg Rd
S. Mobley Rd
Boyette Rd
Linebaugh Ave
S. Mobley Rd
Countryway Blvd
Douglas Rd
Donneymoor Dr
Bell Shoals Rd
SR 60
Start
Date
10/31/2003
10/15/2003
10/31/2003
4/1/2006
10/15/2001
4/10/2007
4/30/2008
7/16/2004
9/6/2006
5/1/2009
11/22/2006
10/2/2009
8/1/2006
Status
Feature
Active
Active
Active
Completed
Completed
Active
Completed
Completed
Completed
Active
Completed
Active
Completed
4 to 8 Lanes
4 to 8 Lanes
4 to 8 Lanes
0 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 6 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 6 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
0 to 4 Lanes
Section Design
ROW Cost
$590,366
$13,368,974
$9,831,370
$4,000,000
$6,750,000
$23,700,000
$23,782,299
$10,216,345
$9,883,047
$102,122,401
Construction
ROWto
Cost
Construction
$14,931,747
4%
$52,249,133
26%
$37,489,099
26%
$7,242,200
55%
$5,656,000
119%
$24,000,000
99%
$12,187,144
$15,973,286
52%
$12,198,251
$5,375,855
$16,570,837
27%
$20,814,450
$8,656,579
114%
$233,344,581
44%
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-11
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table B13
RightofWay Cost Factor for County and State Roads Recent Impact Fee Studies
Year
County
2006
2006
2006
2006
2007
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
2009
2009
2009
2010
2011
2012
2012
2012
2012
2013
2013
2014
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
Collier
Citrus
Highlands
Marion
Pasco
Lake
Flagler
Volusia
Leon
Sumter
Collier
Polk
Hillsborough/Tampa
Collier
Sarasota/North Port
Osceola
Orange
City of Orlando
City of Sarasota
Hernando
Charlotte
Indian River
Collier
Brevard
Sumter
Marion
Palm Beach
Average

ROW
Constr.
ROW Ratio
$1,751,790
$2,558,546
68%
$784,599
$2,584,099
30%
$468,853
$1,678,785
28%
$1,005,123
$1,941,244
52%
$814,517
$3,079,051
26%
$599,185
$2,911,021
21%
$460,000
$1,740,000
26%
$858,109
$2,651,778
32%
$1,120,000
$2,660,000
42%
$802,000
$2,237,000
36%
$1,300,000
$3,100,000
42%
$1,491,000
$1,590,000
94%
$1,500,000
$2,800,000
54%
$901,000
$1,708,000
53%
$620,000
$2,400,000
26%
$1,087,074
$2,651,400
41%
$1,080,000
$2,400,000
45%
$1,080,000
$2,400,000
45%
$620,000
$2,400,000
26%
$811,800
$1,980,000
41%
$1,034,000
$2,200,000
47%
$656,000
$1,598,000
41%
$863,000
$2,700,000
32%
$708,000
$2,023,000
35%
$945,000
$2,100,000
45%
$1,001,000
$1,668,000
60%
$721,000
$1,759,000
41%
$929,002
$2,278,479
41%
(a)

ROW
Constr.
ROW Ratio
$1,751,790
$3,385,978
52%
$949,979
$2,860,227
33%
$507,500
$2,480,900
20%
$868,908
$1,430,919
61%
$1,560,714
$3,050,799
51%
$1,462,133
$3,184,125
46%
n/a
$954,543
$3,095,258
31%
$1,363,000
$3,383,000
40%
$1,400,000
$2,380,000
59%
$1,300,000
$3,200,000
41%
$550,000
$2,170,000
25%
$2,500,000
$3,500,000
71%
$901,000
$2,418,000
37%
$800,000
$2,000,000
40%
$1,167,598
$2,847,800
41%
n/a
$1,305,000
$2,900,000
45%
$1,144,000
$2,600,000
44%
$890,560
$2,024,000
44%
$1,128,000
$2,400,000
47%
$781,000
$1,776,000
44%
$863,000
$2,700,000
32%
$1,006,000
$2,785,000
36%
$1,127,000
$2,505,000
45%
$1,236,000
$2,060,000
60%
$1,333,000
$3,029,000
44%
$1,154,029
$2,646,640
44%
(b)

Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-12
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table B14
Construction Cost Hillsborough County Local Roadway Improvements
Project ID
From
To
Start
Date
Pebble Creek
Palm Springs
Bearss Ave
US 301
US 41
Ehrlich Rd
Bloomingdale Ave
Douglas Rd
Countryway Blvd
Linebaugh Ave
Hillsborough Ave
Balm Riverview Rd
Donneymoor Dr
Brandon Town Center
MLK Blvd
Pasco Co. Line

Pebble Creek Dr
Palm Springs
Falkenburg Rd
78th St
S. Mobley Rd
Boyette Rd
Linebaugh Ave
S. Mobley Rd
Countryway Blvd
Douglas Rd
Donneymoor Dr
Bell Shoals Rd
SR 60
Sydney Rd
10/31/2003
10/15/2003
10/31/2003
4/1/2006
10/7/2011
10/15/2001
4/10/2007
4/30/2008
7/16/2004
9/6/2006
5/1/2009
11/22/2006
10/2/2009
8/1/2006
12/1/2014
Roadway
61043000 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Segment D

61044000 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Segment B/C
61045000 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Segment A
61057000 Columbus Dr Ext.
61150000 Madison Ave
69106000 Gunn Hwy
69112000 Bell Shoals Rd
69118000 Race Track Rd, Ph. I
69119000 Race Track Rd, Ph. II
69120000 Race Track Rd, Ph. III
69121000 Race Track Rd, Ph. IV
69123000 Boyette Rd, Ph. II
69124000 Boyette Rd, Ph. III
69127000 Gornto Lake Rd Ext.
69625000 Turkey Creek Rd
Total
Total (excluding Boyette Rd, Ph. II and Ph. III)
Status
Feature
Active
Active
Active
Completed
Active
Completed
Active
Completed
Completed
Completed
Active
Completed
Active
Completed
Active
4 to 8 Lanes
4 to 8 Lanes
4 to 8 Lanes
0 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 6 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 6 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
0 to 4 Lanes
2 to 4 Lanes
Section Design
Lanes
Length
Added
1.36
3.36
3.56
1.56
2.29
0.90
2.20
1.01
1.80
1.26
0.69
0.92
1.84
0.60
1.40
24.75
21.99
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
4
2
2
4
2
2
4
2
Lane
Construction
Construction
Miles
Cost per Lane
Cost
Added
Mile
5.44
$14,931,747
$2,744,806
13.44
$52,249,133
$3,887,584
14.24
$37,489,099
$2,632,661
6.24
$7,242,200
$1,160,609
4.58
$7,000,000
$1,528,384
1.80
$5,656,000
$3,142,222
4.40
$24,000,000
$5,454,545
4.04
$12,187,144
$3,016,620
3.60
$15,973,286
$4,437,024
2.52
$12,198,251
$4,840,576
2.76
$5,375,855
$1,947,774
$16,570,837
$9,005,890
1.84
3.68
$20,814,450
$5,656,101
2.40
$8,656,579
$3,606,908
2.80
$3,166,000
$1,130,714
73.78 $243,510,581
$3,300,496
68.26 $206,125,294
$3,019,708
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-13
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table B15
Construction Cost County Road Improvements from Other Jurisdictions throughout Florida
County
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Osceola
Osceola
Osceola
Sarasota
Sarasota
Lee
Indian River
Indian River
Polk
Polk
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Collier
Collier
Marion
Marion
Marion
Marion
Orange
Broward
Lee
Charlotte
Indian River
Indian River
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Citrus
Brevard
Sarasota
Lee
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Pinellas
Hernando
Hernando
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
District
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
4
4
1
1
5
5
5
5
5
4
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
7
5
1
1
5
5
5
1
7
7
Description
Clarcona-Ocoee Rd
Woodbury Rd
Sand Lake Rd
Taft-Vineland Road Extension
Narcoossee Rd
Osceola Pkwy (Ph. I)
Poinciana Blvd (Ph. II)
Old Lake Wilson Rd (Ph. I)
Fruitville Rd (Ph. I)
Fruitville Rd (Ph. II)
Colonial Blvd (CR 884)
College Lane Rd
16th St
Pine Tree Trail
Lakeland Highlands Rd
Alt. A1A
Lyons Rd
Hypoluxo Rd
Lawrence Rd
Oil Well Rd (Segment 2)
Oil Well Rd (Segment 4A)
CR 200A
NW 44th Ave
SE 31st St
Alafaya Tr
Bailey Rd
Six Mile Cypress Pkwy
Piper Rd
53rd St
53rd St
45th St
Jog Rd
Congress Ave
Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd
Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd
CR 486
Pineda Cswy Extension
North Cattlemen Rd
Daniels Pkwy
Rouse Rd
CR 535 Seg. A
Goodman Rd
Bryan Dairy Rd
Elgin Blvd
Sunshine Grove Rd
From
Hiawassee Rd
S. of SR 50
President's Dr
Central Florida Pkwy
US 192
FL Turnpike
Crescent Lakes
Livingston Rd
Tatum Rd
Coburn Rd
I-75
Extension IRSC
66th Ave
Ernie Caldwell Blvd
Polk Pkwy
S. of Frederick Small Rd
Glades Rd
Jog Rd
S. of C. Stanley Weaver Canal
Immokalee Rd
W. of Oil Well Grade Rd
US 441
US 27
SE 19th Ave
SE 36th Ave
Avalon Park Blvd
NW 64th Ave / SW 81st Ave
Daniels Pkwy
Henry St
Kings Hwy
Lateral H Canal
Jog Rd
S. of 45th St
Lantana Rd
SR 80
S. of M Canal
SR 44
I-95
Richardson Rd
Chamberlin Pkwy
SR 50
Magnolia Park Ct
Tri-County
Starkey Rd (CR 1)
Mariner Blvd
SR 50
To
Clark
Challenger Pkwy
FL Mall
John Young Pkwy
Orange Co. Line
Buenaventura Blvd
US 17/92
Sinclair Rd
Debrecen Rd
Tatum Rd
SR 82
66th Ave
74th Ave
CR 54/Reagan Pkwy
CR 540A
Center St
Yamato Rd
Military Tr
N. of C. Stanley Weaver Canal
E. of Everglades Blvd
W. of Camp Keais Rd
NE 35th St
NW 60th St
SE 36th Ave
SR 464
Mark Twain Blvd
SR 7 (US 441)
S. of Winkler Rd Ext.
Jones Loop Rd
Lateral H Canal
Indian River Blvd
E. of Haverhill Rd
N. of 45th St
Melaluca Ln
Sycamore Dr
S. of Orange Blvd
Forest Ridge Blvd
W. of Wickham Rd
Desoto Rd
Gateway Blvd
Corporate Blvd
SR 429
Sand Mine Rd
72nd St
East 3900'
Ken Austin Pkwy
B-14
Year
Status
Feature
Design
Length
Lanes
Added
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
4 to 6
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
4 to 6
0 to 2
0 to 2
0 to 2
2 to 4
4 to 6
4 to 6
4 to 6
2 to 4
2 to 4/6
2 to 6
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
0 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
0 to 4
0 to 4
2 to 4
0 to 4
4 to 6
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
0 to 4
2 to 4
4 to 6
2 to 4
2 to 4
0 to 2
4 to 6
2 to 4
2 to 4
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Sub-Urb
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
2.50
0.65
1.00
0.70
7.40
1.57
2.50
2.30
0.72
1.26
2.70
0.50
1.27
1.40
3.01
4.40
1.80
2.00
0.20
5.05
4.72
1.73
2.63
1.50
0.30
3.83
2.00
3.09
2.10
2.04
0.50
1.50
0.50
1.30
4.20
1.40
6.30
2.10
2.55
2.05
2.60
1.37
3.53
1.47
0.74
2.10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2/4
4
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
4
4
2
4
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Lane Miles
Added
Construction Cost
Construction Cost
per Lane Mile
5.00
1.30
2.00
1.40
14.80
3.14
5.00
4.60
1.44
2.52
5.40
1.00
2.54
2.80
6.02
8.80
3.60
4.00
0.40
10.92
18.88
3.46
5.26
$10,182,738
$4,088,942
$6,020,755
$4,462,535
$47,360,000
$5,966,000
$16,000,000
$14,720,000
$4,355,796
$8,557,904
$14,576,393
$1,700,000
$3,109,321
$3,442,332
$13,603,672
$6,364,139
$5,967,464
$4,054,386
$1,051,680
$15,091,068
$15,875,782
$6,451,296
$5,910,189
$2,036,548
$3,145,340
$3,010,378
$3,187,525
$3,200,000
$1,900,000
$3,200,000
$3,200,000
$3,024,858
$3,395,994
$2,699,332
$1,700,000
$1,224,142
$1,229,404
$2,259,746
$723,198
$1,657,629
$1,013,597
$2,629,200
$1,381,966
$840,878
$1,864,536
$1,123,610
4.20
$5,544,524
$1,320,125
7.66
4.00
6.18
4.20
8.16
2.00
3.00
2.00
2.60
8.40
2.80
12.60
8.40
5.10
4.10
5.20
2.74
7.06
2.94
1.48
4.20
$18,918,599
$6,330,297
$6,711,242
$8,627,803
$7,000,000
$7,605,993
$12,423,103
$4,960,399
$6,130,698
$9,930,460
$2,820,892
$26,614,211
$17,238,865
$12,153,584
$2,906,553
$29,380,249
$8,390,570
$7,060,000
$10,327,383
$2,684,566
$4,646,801
$2,469,791
$1,582,574
$1,085,961
$2,054,239
$857,843
$3,802,997
$4,141,034
$2,480,200
$2,357,961
$1,182,198
$1,007,461
$2,112,239
$2,052,246
$2,383,056
$708,915
$5,650,048
$3,062,252
$1,000,000
$3,512,715
$1,813,896
$1,106,381
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table B15 (Continued)
Construction Cost County Road Improvements from Other Jurisdictions throughout Florida
County
District
Description
From
Palm Beach
4
Lyons Rd
N. of West Atlantic Ave
Charlotte
1
Burnt Store Rd (Ph. I)
US 41
Indian River
4
Oslo Rd Ph. II
43rd Ave
Indian River
4
Oslo Rd Ph. III
43rd Ave
Indian River
4
66th Ave
SR 60
Polk
1
Kathleen Rd (CR35A) Ph. II
Galloway Rd
Polk
1
Bartow Northern Connector Ph. I US 98
Volusia
5
Tymber Creek Rd
SR 40
Palm Beach
4
Jog Rd
N. of SR 710
Palm Beach
4
West Atlantic Ave
W. of Lyons Rd
Palm Beach
4
60th St N & SR 7 Ext.
E. of Royal Palm Beach Blvd
Brevard
5
Babcock St
S. of Foundation Park Blvd
Marion
5
SW 110th St
US 41
Marion
5
NW 35th St
NW 35th Avenue Rd
Marion
5
NW 35th St
NW 27th Ave
Sumter
5
C-466A, Ph. III
US 301 N
Collier
1
Collier Blvd (CR 951)
Golden Gate Blvd
Collier
1
Golden Gate Blvd
Wilson Blvd
Brevard
5
St. Johns Heritage Pkwy
SE of I-95 Intersection
Total
Source: Data obtained from each respective county (Building and Public Works Departments
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
To
S. of Boynotno Beach Blvd
Notre Dame Blvd
27th Ave
58th Ave
49th St
Duff Rd
US 17
Peruvian Ln
N. of Florida's Turnpike
Starkey Rd
SR 7
Malabar Rd
SW 200th Ave
NW 27th Ave
US 441
Powell Rd
Green Blvd
Desoto Blvd
US 192 (Space Coast Pkwy)
B-15
Year
Status
Feature
Design
2011
2011
2011
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2014
2014
2014
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
0 to 2
2 to 4
2 to 4D
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
0 to 4
2 to 4
0 to 4
2 to 4
0 to 2
2 to 4
0 to 2
0 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 3/4
4 to 6
2 to 4
0 to 2
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Sub-Urb
Length
3.20
2.40
1.20
1.15
3.05
3.00
2.00
0.75
0.70
0.80
1.50
12.40
0.11
0.50
1.30
1.10
2.74
5.71
3.11
Count:
Lanes
Added
2
2
3
2
2
2
4
2
4
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
65
Lane Miles
Added
Construction Cost
per Lane Mile
Construction Cost
6.40
4.80
3.60
2.30
6.10
6.00
8.00
1.50
2.80
1.60
3.00
24.80
0.22
$5,329,359
$13,512,394
$4,531,822
$3,812,202
$20,773,389
$17,813,685
$11,255,736
$5,276,057
$3,413,874
$8,818,727
$3,821,404
$56,000,000
$438,765
$832,712
$2,815,082
$1,258,839
$1,657,479
$3,405,474
$2,968,948
$1,406,967
$3,517,371
$1,219,241
$5,511,704
$1,273,801
$2,258,065
$1,994,386
4.60
$8,616,236
$1,873,095
2.20
5.48
11.42
6.22
324.34
$4,283,842
$21,157,124
$51,402,161
$16,763,567
$694,339,528
$1,947,201
$3,860,789
$4,501,065
$2,695,107
$2,140,777
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table B16
Construction Cost State Road Improvements from Hillsborough County and Other Jurisdictions throughout Florida
County
Leon
Indian River
Sarasota
Pasco
Lee
Marion
Miami-Dade
Polk
Santa Rosa
Santa Rosa
St. Lucie
Sumter
Washington
Lake
Polk
Santa Rosa
Santa Rosa
Lee
Polk
St. Lucie
Polk
Hillsborough
Pinellas
Polk
Lake
Hillsborough
Collier
Volusia
Volusia
Pinellas
Miami-Dade
Hernando
Orange
Clay
Hendry
Hendry
Lee
Seminole
Palm Beach
Polk
Polk
Brevard
Broward
Lee
Brevard
Hillsborough
Lee
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
District
3
4
1
7
1
5
6
1
3
3
4
5
3
5
1
3
3
1
1
4
1
7
7
1
5
7
1
5
5
7
6
7
5
2
1
1
1
5
4
1
1
5
4
1
5
7
1
Description
SR 10 (Mahan Drive)
SR 60 (Osceola Blvd)
US 301
US 41 (SR 45)
SR 739
SR 35 (US 301)
Perimeter Rd
US 27
SR 281 (Avalon Blvd)
SR 70
SR 35 (US 301)
SR 79
SR 50
SR 559 Extension
US 41
US 98
SR 70
US 98 (Bartow Hwy)
CR 39/Alexander St
SR 688 (Ulmerton Rd)
SR 60 (Van Fleet)
SR 500 (US 441)
SR 574 (MLK Blvd)
SR 84 (Davis Blvd)
SR 415
SR 415
US 19 (SR 55)
SR 823/NW 57th Ave
SR 50 (Cortez Blvd)
SR 50
SR 23
SR 80
SR 80
SR 739
SR 434
SR 710/Beeline Hwy
US 27
US 98 (SR 35/SR 700)
SR 5 (US 1)
Andrews Ave Ext.
SR 78 (Pine Island)
SR 507 (Babcock St)
SR 41 (US 301)
US 41 Business
From
Dempsey Mayo Rd
W. of I-95
Wood St
Tower Rd
US 41 (S. of Alico)
Sumter County Line
NW 72 Avenue
N. of CR 546
N. of CSX R/R Bridge
Gulf Rd
MP 5.860
N. of CR 204
N. Environmental Rd
E. of Grand Hwy
SR 655 (Recker Hwy)
SR 8 (I-10)
S. of Moor's Lodge
Corkscrew Rd
S. of Manor Dr
Okeechobee County Line
Brooks St
N. of I-4
E. of 119th St
W. of US 98/Broadway
Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd
W. of Highview Rd
E. of Santa Barbara Blvd
Seminole Co. Line
Reed Ellis Rd
N. of CR 576/Sunset Pnt
W. 23rd St
US 19 (SR 55)
E. of West Oaks Mall
Oakleaf Plantation Pkwy
Birchwood Pkwy
CR 833
Winkler Ave
I-4
W. of Congress Ave
N. of Ritchie Rd
N. of CR 540A
N. of Pine St
NW 18th St
Burnt Store Rd
Melbourne Ave
S. of Tampa Bypass Canal
Littleton Rd
To
Walden Rd
W. of 82nd Ave/CR 609
Myrtle Ave
Ridge Rd
Six Mile Cypress Pkwy
529' S. of CR 42
NW 57 Avenue
S. of SR 544
S. of Commerce Rd
SR 10 (US 90)
MP 10.216
Marion County Line
Strickland Rd
W. of Hancock Rd
Derby Ave
S. of Moor's Lodge
N. of CSX R/R Bridge
San Carlos Blvd
N. of CR 540A
MP 5.871
Edgewood Dr
N. of Knights Griffin
W. of Seminole Bypass
W. of US 17 (SR 555)
Lake Ella Rd
E. of Parsons Ave
W. of Radio Rd
Reed Ellis Rd
0.3 miles N. of Acorn Lake
S. of Countryside Blvd
W. 46th St
W. of CR 587/Mariner Blvd
W. of Good Homes Rd
Old Jennings
Dalton Lane
US 27
Hanson St
Rangeline Rd
W. of Australian Ave
S. of Barry Rd
SR 540
N. of Cidco Rd
Copans Rd
W of Chiquita Blvd
Fee Ave
N. of Fowler Ave
SR 739
B-16
Year
Status
Feature
Design
Length
Lanes
Added
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
2 to 4
4 to 6
4 to 6
2 to 4
0 to 6
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
4 to 6
0 to 2
2 to 4
2 to 4
4 to 6
4 to 6
2 to 4
4 to 6
0 to 4
4 to 6
2 to 4
4 to 6
3 to 5
2 to 6
2 to 4
2 to 4
4 to 6
4 to 6
4 to 6
4 to 6
0 to 2
2 to 4
2 to 4
0 to 6
4 to 6
2 to 4
4 to 6
4 to 6
4 to 6
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
2 to 4
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Sub-Urb
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Sub-Urb
Urban
3.10
3.07
2.60
2.84
2.77
1.40
1.50
1.56
0.98
1.78
4.36
1.51
1.72
1.30
0.69
0.85
1.48
4.48
3.32
5.87
0.72
3.19
1.50
0.86
3.25
0.91
1.77
2.26
5.07
1.76
1.48
6.02
0.45
3.14
5.00
2.90
1.34
1.80
0.84
3.20
3.45
3.84
0.50
1.94
0.55
1.81
1.23
2
2
2
2
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Lane Miles
Added
6.20
6.14
5.20
5.68
16.62
2.80
3.00
3.12
1.96
3.56
8.72
3.02
3.44
2.60
1.38
1.70
2.96
8.96
6.64
11.74
1.44
12.76
3.00
1.72
6.50
1.82
7.08
4.53
10.13
3.52
2.96
12.04
0.90
6.28
10.00
5.80
8.04
3.60
1.68
6.40
6.90
7.68
1.00
3.88
1.10
3.62
2.46
Construction Cost
$18,083,410
$7,134,452
$14,666,593
$12,685,027
$20,552,627
$3,596,000
$4,855,070
$4,100,069
$5,621,006
$9,150,583
$12,426,020
$3,856,688
$8,877,323
$4,689,633
$2,751,592
$5,378,226
$7,120,212
$12,468,224
$11,092,909
$18,782,629
$4,341,917
$14,782,862
$16,908,928
$9,460,591
$16,278,889
$7,147,510
$10,663,287
$18,718,637
$18,388,845
$17,196,050
$13,942,533
$39,444,222
$8,694,472
$13,231,111
$12,855,092
$8,117,039
$14,025,932
$10,111,333
$12,189,533
$14,242,918
$17,707,436
$28,089,660
$6,592,014
$8,005,048
$5,167,891
$15,758,965
$8,488,393
Construction Cost
per Lane Mile
$2,916,679
$1,161,963
$2,820,499
$2,233,279
$1,236,620
$1,284,286
$1,618,357
$1,314,125
$2,867,860
$2,570,388
$1,425,002
$1,277,049
$2,580,617
$1,803,705
$1,993,907
$3,163,662
$2,405,477
$1,391,543
$1,670,619
$1,599,883
$3,015,220
$1,158,532
$5,636,309
$5,500,344
$2,504,444
$3,927,203
$1,506,114
$4,132,149
$1,815,286
$4,885,241
$4,710,315
$3,276,098
$9,660,524
$2,106,865
$1,285,509
$1,399,489
$1,744,519
$2,808,704
$7,255,674
$2,225,456
$2,566,295
$3,657,508
$6,592,014
$2,063,157
$4,698,083
$4,353,305
$3,450,566
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table B16 (continued)
Construction Cost State Road Improvements from Hillsborough County and Other Jurisdictions throughout Florida
County
District
Brevard
Orange
Okeechobee
Martin
Pinellas
Broward
Nassau
Broward
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Charlotte
Duval
Desoto
Pinellas
Orange
Hendry
Sarasota
Clay
Putnam
Palm Beach
Osceola
Orange
Osceola
Total
5
5
1
4
7
4
2
4
6
6
1
2
1
7
5
1
1
2
2
4
5
5
5
Description
Apollo Blvd
SR 50 (Colonial Dr)
SR 70
CR 714/Indian St
43rd St Extension
SR 7 (US 441)
SR 200 (A1A)
Andrews Ave Ext.
SR 823/NW 57th Ave
SR 823/NW 57th Ave
US 41 (SR 45)
SR 243 (JIA N Access)
US 17
SR 688 (Ulmerton Rd)
SR 50
SR 82 (Immokalee Rd)
SR 45A (US 41) (Venice Bypass)
SR 21
SR 15 (US 17)
SR 710 (Beeline Hwy)
SR 500 (US 192/441)
SR 15 (Hofner Rd)
SR 500 (US 192/441)
From
Sarno Rd
E. of CR 425 (Dean Rd)
NE 34th Ave
Turnpike/Martin Downs Blvd
S. of 118th Ave
N. of Hallendale Beach
W. of Still Quarters Rd
Pompano Park Place
W. 65th St
W. 53rd St
Enterprise Dr
Airport Rd
CR 760A (Nocatee)
E. of 49th St
SR 429 (Western Beltway)
Lee County Line
Gulf Coast Blvd
S. of Branan Field
Horse Landing Rd
W. of Australian Ave
Eastern Ave
Lee Vista Blvd
Aeronautical Blvd
To
Eau Gallie Blvd
E. of Old Cheney Hwy
NE 80th Ave
W. of Mapp Rd
40th St
N. of Fillmore St
W. of Ruben Ln
S. of Atlantic Blvd
W. 84th St
W. 65th St
Sarasota County Line
Pelican Park (I-95)
Heard St
W. of 38th St N
E. of West Oaks Mall
Collier County Line
Bird Bay Dr W
Old Jennings Rd
N Boundary Rd
Old Dixie Hwy
Nova Rd
Conway Rd
Budinger Ave
Year
Status
Feature
Design
2013
2013
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
Bid
2 to 4
4 to 6
2 to 4
2 to 4
0 to 4
4 to 6
4 to 6
2 to 4
4 to 6
4 to 6
4 to 6
0 to 2
2 to 4
4 to 6
4 to 6
2 to 4
4 to 6
4 to 6
2 to 4
2 to 4
4 to 6
2 to 4
4 to 6
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Length
0.74
4.91
3.60
1.87
0.49
1.79
3.05
0.36
1.00
0.78
3.62
2.60
4.40
0.76
2.56
1.27
1.14
1.45
1.99
0.82
3.18
3.81
3.94
Count:
Lanes
Added
Lane Miles
Added
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
70
1.48
9.82
7.20
3.74
1.96
3.58
6.10
0.72
2.00
1.56
7.24
5.20
8.80
1.52
5.12
2.54
2.28
2.90
3.98
1.64
6.36
7.62
7.88
343.52
Construction Cost
$10,318,613
$66,201,688
$23,707,065
$14,935,957
$4,872,870
$30,674,813
$18,473,682
$3,177,530
$17,896,531
$14,837,466
$31,131,016
$14,205,429
$29,584,798
$19,306,771
$34,275,001
$7,593,742
$16,584,224
$15,887,487
$13,869,804
$17,423,228
$16,187,452
$37,089,690
$34,256,621
$1,050,930,879
Construction Cost
per Lane Mile
$6,972,036
$6,741,516
$3,292,648
$3,993,571
$2,486,158
$8,568,384
$3,028,472
$4,413,236
$8,948,266
$9,511,196
$4,299,864
$2,731,813
$3,361,909
$12,701,823
$6,694,336
$2,989,662
$7,273,782
$5,478,444
$3,484,875
$10,623,920
$2,545,197
$4,867,413
$4,347,287
$3,059,300
Source: FDOT Bid Tabs
Table B17
Construction Engineering & Inspection Cost Factor Hillsborough County Local Roadway Improvements
Project ID
Roadway
61043000 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Segment D

61044000 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Segment B/C
61045000 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Segment A
Total
From
Pebble Creek
Palm Springs
Bearss Ave
To
Pasco Co. Line
Pebble Creek Dr
Palm Springs
Start
Date
10/31/2003
10/15/2003
10/31/2003
Status
Feature
Active
Active
Active
4 to 8 Lanes
4 to 8 Lanes
4 to 8 Lanes
Section Design
CEI Cost
$1,356,000
$4,746,261
$3,645,578
$9,747,839
Construction
CEIto
Cost
Construction
$14,931,747
9%
$52,249,133
9%
$37,489,099
10%
$104,669,979
9%
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-17
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table B18
CEI Cost Factor for County and State Roads Recent Impact Fee Studies
Year
County
2006
2006
2006
2006
2007
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
2009
2009
2009
2010
2011
2012
2012
2012
2012
2013
2013
2014
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
Collier
Citrus
Highlands
Marion
Pasco
Lake
Flagler
Volusia
Leon
Sumter
Collier
Polk
Hillsborough/Tampa
Collier
Sarasota/North Port
Osceola
Orange
City of Orlando
City of Sarasota
Hernando
Charlotte
Indian River
Collier
Brevard
Sumter
Marion
Palm Beach
Average

CEI
Constr.
CEI Ratio
$294,054
$2,558,546
11%
$180,887
$2,584,099
7%
n/a
n/a
$215,534
$3,079,051
7%
$116,441
$2,911,021
4%
$174,000
$1,740,000
10%
$238,660
$2,651,778
9%
$372,400
$2,660,000
14%
$223,700
$2,237,000
10%
$186,000
$3,100,000
6%
$111,300
$1,590,000
7%
$308,000
$2,800,000
11%
$119,560
$1,708,000
7%
$216,000
$2,400,000
9%
$265,140
$2,651,400
10%
$2,400,000
n/a
$2,400,000
n/a
$216,000
$2,400,000
9%
$178,200
$1,980,000
9%
$220,000
$2,200,000
10%
$143,000
$1,598,000
9%
$270,000
$2,700,000
10%
$344,000
$2,023,000
17%
$147,000
$2,100,000
7%
$50,000
$1,668,000
3%
$108,000
$1,759,000
6%
$204,255
$2,308,648
9%
(a)

CEI
Constr.
CEI Ratio
$354,442
$3,385,978
10%
$474,464
$2,860,227
17%
n/a
n/a
$442,849
$3,050,799
15%
$318,412
$3,184,125
10%
n/a
$309,526
$3,095,258
10%
$270,640
$3,383,000
8%
$238,000
$2,380,000
10%
$320,000
$3,200,000
10%
$217,000
$2,170,000
10%
$315,000
$3,500,000
9%
$241,800
$2,418,000
10%
$180,000
$2,000,000
9%
$313,258
$2,847,800
11%
n/a
$2,900,000
n/a
$286,000
$2,600,000
11%
$222,640
$2,024,000
11%
$240,000
$2,400,000
10%
$196,000
$1,776,000
11%
$270,000
$2,700,000
10%
$316,000
$2,875,000
11%
$250,000
$2,505,000
10%
$227,000
$2,060,000
11%
$333,000
$3,029,000
11%
$6,336,031
$59,444,187
11%
(b)

Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-18
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Roadway Capacity
As shown in Table B-19, the average capacity per lane mile was based on the projects in the
Hillsborough County 2040 Long Range Transportation Cost Feasible Plan and the Community
Transportation Plan. This listing of projects reflects the mix of improvements that will yield
the vehicle-miles of capacity (VMC) that will be built in Hillsborough County. The resulting
weighted average capacity per lane mile of 9,500 was used in the mobility fee calculation.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-19
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table B19
Hillsborough County 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan & Community Transportation Plan
Jurisdiction
Description
State Roads
State
Hillsborough Ave
State
US 92
State
US 92
State
SR 60
State
US 41
State
US 301
County/City Roads
City
Reo St
City
Trask St
City
Interbay Blvd
County Orient Rd
County Progress Blvd
County Big Bend Rd
County Lithia Pinecrest Blvd
County Harney Rd
County Sligh Ave
County County Line Rd
County Anderson Rd
County Anderson Rd
County Bearss Ave
County Davis Rd
County Falkenburg Rd
County Fletcher Ave
County Linebaugh Ave
County New E/W Road (New Tampa)
City
New Tampa Blvd
City
Occident St Extension
County Sam Allen Rd
County Sam Allen Rd Extension
City
Trask St Extension
County Woodberry Rd
County Citrus Park Dr Extension
Total (All Roads):
County Roads (includes City Rds):
State Roads:
Urban (Curb & Gutter) Section Design:
Rural (Open Drainage) Section Design:
New Road Construction:
Lane Addition:
From
To
Improvement
Length
Lanes
Added
Lane
Miles
Added
Section
Design
Initial
Capacity
Future
Capacity
Added
Capacity
Vehicle Miles
of Capacity
Added
50th St
I-4
Reynolds St
Valrico Rd
Madison Ave
SR 60
Orient Rd
CR 579 (Mango Rd)
County Line Rd
SR 39
Causeway Blvd
Selmon Expressway
Lane Addition (4 to 6)
1.77
2.95
3.57
8.04
1.52
1.31
2
2
2
2
2
2
3.54
5.90
7.14
16.08
3.04
2.62
Urban
Urban
Rural
Urban
Urban
Urban
39,800
17,700
17,700
39,800
39,800
39,800
59,900
39,800
39,800
59,900
59,900
59,900
20,100
22,100
22,100
20,100
20,100
20,100
35,577
65,195
78,897
161,604
30,552
26,331
Gray St
Cypress St
Manhattan Ave
Sligh Ave
Magnolia Park Blvd
US 41
Adelaide Ave
Hillsborough Ave
56th St
Livingston Ave
Hillsborough Ave
Sligh Ave
I-275
Harney Rd
MLK Jr. Blvd
30th St
Sheldon Rd
I-275
Commerce Park Blvd
Cypress St
Park Rd
Wilder Rd
Cypress St
Falkenburg Rd
Country Way Blvd
Cypress St
Boyscout Blvd
Dale Mabry Hwy
Columbus Dr
Valleydale Dr
I-75
Lumsden Dr
Temple Terrace Hwy
US 301
Grand Hampton
Hoover Blvd
Linebaugh Ave
BB Downs Blvd
Maislin Dr
Hillsborough Ave
Morris Bridge Rd
Veterans Exway
Commerce Park Blvd
BB Downs Blvd
Westshore Plaza
Wilder Rd
County Line Rd
Gray St
Grand Regency Blvd
Sheldon Rd
New Road Construction (0 to 2)
0.30
0.52
0.90
3.00
0.55
1.70
4.00
2.19
2.37
3.11
0.99
2.13
2.08
0.40
0.98
4.07
1.53
2.75
2.35
0.22
0.43
1.70
0.25
0.58
2.74
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
4
2
2
4
0.60
1.04
1.80
6.00
1.10
3.40
8.00
4.38
4.74
6.22
1.98
4.26
4.16
0.80
1.96
8.14
3.06
11.00
4.70
0.44
0.86
6.80
0.50
1.16
10.96
136.38
98.06
38.32
115.36
21.02
31.54
104.84
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Rural
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Urban
Rural
Rural
Urban
Urban
Urban
14,060
0
16,815
16,815
16,815
37,810
16,815
16,815
16,815
16,815
14,060
32,110
37,810
0
16,815
34,471
37,810
0
15,930
0
16,815
0
0
16,815
0
30,780
14,060
37,810
37,810
37,810
56,905
37,810
37,810
37,810
37,810
30,780
48,355
56,905
14,060
37,810
51,890
56,905
30,780
35,820
13,320
37,810
16,815
13,320
37,810
37,810
16,720
14,060
20,995
20,995
20,995
19,095
20,995
20,995
20,995
20,995
16,720
16,245
19,095
14,060
20,995
17,419
19,095
30,780
19,890
13,320
20,995
16,815
13,320
20,995
37,810
5,016
7,311
18,896
62,985
11,547
32,462
83,980
45,979
49,758
65,294
16,553
34,602
39,718
5,624
20,575
70,895
29,215
84,645
46,742
2,930
9,028
28,586
3,330
12,177
103,599
1,289,603
891,447
398,156
1,107,798
181,805
1,107,798
181,805
9,500
72% (a)
28% (b)
85% (c)
15% (d)
23% (e)
77% (f)
VMC Added per Lane Mile:
Source: Imagine Hillsborough 2040 Long Range Transportation Cost Feasible Plan
Hillsborough Community Transportation Plan
Discussions with Public Works Staff
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-20
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Transit Capital Costs
To convert the roadway impact fee into a mobility fee, the marginal cost of adding transit
infrastructure needs to be considered. This section details the difference in cost per personmile of capacity between expanding a roadway without transit amenities versus expanding a
roadway with transit amenities. This calculation also accounts for the change in roadway
PMC that occurs when a bus is on the road.
First, Table B-21 calculates the person-miles of capacity added for each new transit vehicle
on the road. This calculation adjusts for the fact that buses have a much higher personcapacity than passenger vehicles. This table also identifies transit capital cost variables that
will be used to calculate the added capital cost of constructing/expanding a roadway with
transit facilities.
Next, Table B-20 combines the roadway VMC and the transit PMC to calculate the marginal
change in cost per PMC. First, the roadway characteristics, including cost and capacity, were
used to calculate the roadway cost per VMC for a generic 20-mile roadway segment. Then,
an adjustment factor was applied to recognize that incorporating transit along a segment of
roadway decreases the vehicle-capacity as the bus makes intermittent stops and interrupts
the free-flowing traffic. As shown in Table B-20, the bus blockage adjustment factor is much
higher for a 2-lane roadway than for a 4-lane roadway. On a 2-lane road, all cars get caught
behind the bus during a stop, while on a 4-lane roadway, there is an unobstructed travel lane
that cars can use to pass-by or maneuver around the slower transit vehicle. This adjusted
VMC was then converted to PMC using the vehicle-miles to person-miles adjustment factor
previously discussed in this report. The additional person-capacity from the buses was added
to the adjusted roadway PMC. The person-miles of capacity that a transit system would add
to the stretch of roadway (Table B-21) mitigates the decrease in vehicle-miles of capacity due
to the bus blockage adjustments.
Next, the capital cost of transit infrastructure was added to the capital cost of the roadway
expansion for both new road construction (0 to 2 lanes) and lane addition (2 to 4 lanes). With
the transit infrastructure included, the updated cost per PMC was calculated, which now
reflects the total cost of building a new road with transit, or expanding a roadway and adding
transit amenities. When compared to the cost per PMC for simply building/expanding a
roadway without transit, the added cost of transit is between two (2) percent and five (5)
percent.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-21
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
As a final step, the increased costs were then weighted by the lane mile distribution of new
road construction and lane addition improvements in the Hillsborough County 2040 Long
Range Transportation Cost Feasible Plan and the Community Transportation Plan. As shown,
the plan calls for a higher number of lane addition improvements through 2040. When the
marginal cost of transit is included and weighted by this ratio, the resulting percent change is
approximately 3.15 percent. Essentially, adding transit does not have a significant effect on
the cost per person-mile of capacity for new road construction and lane addition
improvements.
As it is currently structured, the transit model detailed in Tables B-20 and B-21 assumes that
transit-miles and road-miles will be added to the system at the same rate. If the County builds
more transit-miles, this would increase the bus traffic on existing roads, adding more stops,
higher stop frequency, and creating additional bus blockage. As a result, the capital cost per
person-mile for a roadway with transit would increase in relation to the ratio of added transitmiles vs. roadway-miles. For example, if the transit-mile investment was double that of
roadway construction/expansion, the 3.15 percent change calculated in Table B-20 would
increase to approximately 6.30 percent. The annual construction figures for transit-miles and
road-miles should be tracked by the County and adjusted for in subsequent mobility fee
update studies.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
B-22
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table B20
Mobility Fee: Transit Component Model
New Road Construction
Roadway
Transit
Item
Lane Addtions
Roadway
Transit
Source:
Roadway Characteristics:
Roadway Cost per Mile
(1)
Roadway Segment Length (miles)
(2)
(3)
Roadway Segment Cost
$9,924,000
$9,924,000
20.00
20.00
$198,480,000
PMC
$198,480,000
1) Source: Table 3, adjusted to cost "per mile"

2) Source: Average length of HART route
PMC
3) Roadway cost per mile (Item 1) multiplied by the roadway segment length (Item 2)
Average Capacity Added (per mile)
(4)
19,000
24,700
19,000
VMC/PMC Added (entire segment)
(5)
380,000
494,000
380,000
494,000 5) Roadway segment length (Item 2) multiplied by the average capacity added (Item 4) for both VMC and PMC
$522.32
$401.78
$522.32
$401.78 6) Roadway segment cost (Item 3) divided by the VMC/PMC added (Item 5) individually
3.2%
1.6%
12,160
15,808
6,080
367,840
478,192
373,920
Roadway Cost per VMC/PMC
(6)
24,700 4) Source: Table 4, adjusted to capacity "per mile"
Transit Capacity:
Adjustment for Bus Blockage
(7)
VMC/PMC Added (transit deduction)
(8)
VMC/PMC Added (less transit deduction)

PMC Added (transit addition ONLY)
(9)
(10)
8,064
Net PMC Added (transit effect included)
(11)
Road/Transit Cost per PMC (Road Capital)
(12)
- 7) Source: 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, Equation 18-9

7,904 8) VMC added (Item 5) multiplied by the adjustment for bus blockage (Item 7) . For PMC, multiply the VMC by 1.30 persons per vehicle
486,096 9) VMC/PMC added (entire segment) (Item 5) less the VMC/PMC added (transit deduction) (Item 8) for VMC and PMC individually
8,064 10) Source: Table B-10, Adjusted Person-Miles of Capacity (Item 12)
486,256
494,160 11) PMC added (less transit deduction) (Item 9) plus the PMC added (transit addition ONLY) (Item 10)
$408.18
$401.65 12) Road segment cost (Item 3) divided by the net PMC added (transit effect included) (Item 11)
Transit Infrastructure:
Buses Needed
(13)
Stops per mile (both sides of street)
(14)
Shelters per mile (both sides of street)

Total infrastructure
(15)
(16)
$3,125,000
$3,125,000 13) Number of vehicles (see Table B-10, Item 2) multiplied by the vehicle cost (see Table B-10, Item 15)
$1,440,000
$1,440,000 14) Stops per mile (3) multiplied by the roadway segment length (Item 2) multiplied by the cost per stop (Table B-10, Item 16)
$1,000,000
$1,000,000 15) Shelters per mile (1) multiplied by the roadway segment length (Item 2) multiplied by the cost per shelter (Table B-10, Item 17)
$5,565,000
$5,565,000 16) Sum of buses needed (Item 13), stops needed (Item 14), and shelters needed (Item 15)
Multi-Modal Cost per PMC:

Road/Transit Cost per PMC
Percent Change
(17)
$419.62
(18)
$412.91 17) Sum of the roadway segment cost (Item 3) and the total transit infrastructure cost (Item 16) divided by the net PMC added (Item 11)
4.44%
2.77% 18) Percent difference between the road/transit cost per PMC (Item 17) and the Roadway cost per PMC (Item 6)
Weighted Multi-Modal Cost per PMC:

(19)
Weighted Roadway Cost per PMC
23%
(20)
Weighted Road/Transit Cost per PMC
(21)
77% 19) Source: Appendix B, Table B-19, Items (e) and (f). Lane mile distribution of new road construction versus lane addition
$92.41
$309.37 20) Roadway cost per PMC (Item 6) multiplied by the lane mile distribution (Item 19)
$96.51
$317.94 21) Road/Transit cost per PMC (Item 17) multiplied by the lane mile distribution (Item 19)
Weighted Average Multi-Modal Cost per PMC:

Weighted Average Roadway Cost per PMC (new road construction and lane additions)
(22)
Weighted Average Road/Transit Cost per PMC (new road construction and lane additions)
Percent Change
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
(24)
$401.78 22) Sum of the weighted roadway cost per PMC (Item 20) for new road construction and lane additions
(23)
$414.45 23) Sum of the weighted road/transit cost per PMC (Item 21) for new road construction and lane additions
3.15% 24) Percent difference between the weighted average road/transit cost per PMC (Item 23) and the weighted average roadway cost per PMC (Item 22)
B-23
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table B21
Mobility Cost per PersonMile of Capacity
Input
Local Transit
Transit PersonMiles of Capacity Calculation

Vehicle Capacity
(1)
Number of Vehicles (20% fleet margin)

Service Span (hours)
(4)
2.00 4) Headway time (Item 6) divided by 60

32 5) Service span (Item 3) multiplied by the cycles/hour (Item 4)
(6)
30 6) Source: Assumption based on current HART routes
(7)
12 7) Source: Integrated National Transit Database Analysis System (INTDAS). 6-yr average
Round Trip Length (miles)

Cycle Time (minutes)
(8)
20.00 8) Source: Average trip length of current HART routes
(9)
100 9) Round trip length (Item 8) divided by speed (Item 7) multiplied by 60
Total Person-Miles of Capacity

Load Factor/System Capacity
(10)
26,880 10) Vehicle capacity (Item 1) multiplied by the cycles per day (Item 5) multiplied by the round trip length (Item 8)
(11)
30% 11) Source: Optimistic assumption based on future goals

(12)
Adjusted Person-Miles of Capacity

Capital Cost Variables
Stops per Mile (w/o Shelter)
Shelters per Mile
(14)
(15)
Vehicle Cost
Simple Bus Stop
(13)
8,064 12) Total person-miles of capacity (Item 10) multiplied by the load factor (Item 11)
3 13) Source: Model assumes 3 bench stops per mile
1 14) Source: Model assumes 1 shelter stop per mile
$625,000 15) Source: Assumption based on local characteristics and industry knowledge
(16)
Sheltered Bus Stop
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
5 2) Cycle time (Item 9) divided by headway time (Item 6) increased by 20 percent to accommodate the required fleet margin
16 3) Source: Assumption based on current HART routes
(5)
Headway Time (minutes)

Speed (mph)
(2)
(3)
Cycles/Hour (aka Peak Vehicles)

Cycles per Day
Source:
42 1) Source: Local transit is assumed to have 30 seats with a 40 percent standing room capacity equivalent
(17)
B-24
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Appendix C
Credit Component Calculations
DRAFT
Credit Component
This appendix presents the detailed calculations for the credit component. Currently, in
addition to the capital support that ultimately results from State fuel tax revenue,
Hillsborough County also receives financial benefit from several other funding sources. Of
these, the fuel taxes collected in Hillsborough County are listed below, along with a few
pertinent characteristics of each.
1. Constitutional Fuel Tax (2/gallon)
Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. Collected
in accordance with Article XII, Section 9 (c) of the Florida Constitution
The State allocated 80 percent of this tax to Counties after withholding amounts
pledged for debt service on bonds issued pursuant to provisions of the State
Constitution for road and bridge purposes
The 20 percent surplus can be used to support the road construction program within
the county
Counties are not required to share the proceeds of this tax with their municipalities
2. County Fuel Tax (1/gallon)
Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county
Primary purpose of these funds is to help reduce a Countys reliance on ad valorem

taxes
Proceeds are to be used for transportation-related expenses, including the reduction

of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes. Authorized uses include
acquisition of rights-of-way; the construction, reconstruction, operation,
maintenance, and repair of transportation facilities, roads, bridges, bicycle paths, and
pedestrian pathways; or the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for
transportation purposes
3. Municipal Fuel Tax (1/gallon)
Tax applies to every net gallon of motor fuel sold within a county
Primary purpose of the municipal revenue sharing program is to ensure a minimum

level of parity across units of local government
Proceeds may be used to fund purchase of transportation facilities and road and
street rights-of-way; construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of roads, streets,
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
C-1
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
bicycle paths, and pedestrian pathways; adjustments of city-owned utilities as
required by road and street construction; and construction, reconstruction,
transportation-related public safety activities, maintenance, and operation of
transportation facilities
4. NinthCent Fuel Tax (1/gallon)
Proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures
To accommodate statewide equalization, this tax is automatically levied on diesel fuel

in every county, regardless of whether a County is levying the tax on motor fuel at all
5. 1st Local Option Tax (6/gallon)
Proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures
To accommodate statewide equalization, all six cents are automatically levied on

diesel fuel in every county, regardless of whether a County is levying the tax on motor
fuel at all or at the maximum rate
Proceeds are distributed to a county and its municipalities according to a mutually

agreed upon distribution ratio, or by using a formula contained in the Florida Statutes
Each year, the Florida Legislatures Office of Economic and Demographic Research produces
the Local Government Financial Information Handbook, which details the estimated local
government revenues for the upcoming fiscal year. Included in this document are the
estimated distributions of the various fuel tax revenues for each county in the state. The
2015-16 data represent projected fuel tax distributions to Hillsborough County for the current
fiscal year. In the table, the fuel tax revenue data are used to calculate the value per penny
(per gallon of fuel) that should be used to estimate the equivalent pennies of other revenue
sources. Table C-1 shows the distribution per penny for each of the fuel levies, and then the
calculation of the weighted average for the value of a penny of fuel tax. The weighting
procedure takes into account the differing amount of revenues generated for the various
types of gas tax revenues. The weighted average figure of approximately $5.94 million
estimates the annual revenue that one penny of gas tax generates in Hillsborough County.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
C-2
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table C1
Estimated Fuel Tax Distributions Allocated to Capital Program of
Hillsborough County & Municipalities, FY 201516(1)
Amount of Levy
per Gallon
Tax
Total
Distribution
Distribution
per Penny
Constitutional Fuel Tax
$0.02
$11,429,659
$5,714,830
County Fuel Tax
$0.01
$5,070,188
$5,070,188
Municipal Fuel Tax
$0.01
$3,491,962
$3,491,962
9th Cent Fuel Tax
$0.01
$6,806,685
$6,806,685
1st Local Option (1-6 cents)
$0.06
$38,550,428
$6,425,071
$0.11
$65,348,922
Total
(2)
Weighted Average per Penny
$5,940,811
1) Source: Florida Legislatures Office of Economic and Demographic Research; Local

Government Financial Information Handbook
2) The weighted average distribution per penny is calculated by taking the sum of the total
distribution and dividing that value by the sum of the total levies per gallon (multiplied
by 100).
Capital Improvement Credit

A revenue credit for the annual expenditures on transportation capacity expansion projects
in Hillsborough County is presented below. The four components of the credit are as follows:
County gas tax equivalent pennies

County debt service
County sales tax (potential 0.5% referendum)
State gas tax expenditures
The annual expenditures from each revenue source are converted to gas tax pennies to be
able to create a connection between travel by each land use and tax revenue contributions.
County Gas Tax Equivalent Pennies
A review of Hillsborough Countys recent historical expenditures and 6-year planned
expenditures shows that transportation projects are primarily being funded by a combination
of impact fees, gas taxes, Community Investment Tax (CIT), general revenues (ad valorem),
and grants. As shown in Table C-2, a total gas tax equivalent revenue credit of 5.3 pennies
was given for transportation capacity-expansion projects funded with non-impact fee
revenues.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
C-3
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table C2
County Fuel Tax Equivalent Pennies
Cost of
Projects
Source
Projected CIP Expenditures (FY 2016-2021)
(1)
Historical County Expenditures (FY 2011-2015)
(2)
Number
of Years
Revenue
from 1
(3)
Penny
Equivalent
(4)
Pennies
$198,099,646
$5,940,811
$0.056
$149,830,524
$5,940,811
$0.050
Total
$347,930,170
11
$5,940,811
$0.053
1) Source: Table C-6
4) Cost of projects divided by number of years divided by revenue from 1 penny (Item 3) multiplied by 0.01
In addition, the County receives an equivalent credit of 3.4 pennies for debt service
associated with the CIT Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2015, 2012B, and 2012. This credit
is given for only the portion used for transportation capacity-expansion improvements.
Table C3
County Debt Service Equivalent Pennies
Cost of
Projects
Source
(1)
CIT Revenue Refunding Bond; Series 2015
Number
of Years
Revenue
from 1
(4)
Penny
Equivalent
(5)
Pennies
$102,657,682
10
$5,940,811
$0.017
$35,989,230
10
$5,940,811
$0.006
$69,349,403
11
$5,940,811
$0.011
(2)
CIT Revenue Refunding Bond; Series 2012B
(3)
CIP Revenue Refunding Bond; Series 2012
Total
$0.034
Hillsborough County is currently considering the possibility of adopting an additional 0.5

percent of local infrastructure sales surtax. If the referendum for this sales tax passes, a
portion of the new revenues would be dedicated to transportation capacity. Therefore, an
additional credit option was developed to reflect this potential new revenue source. Table
C-4 details the additional equivalent pennies that should be included in the mobility fee credit
should the sales tax referendum pass in Hillsborough County.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
C-4
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table C4
County Sales Tax Community Transportation Plan
Cost of
Projects
Source
1/2 Cent Sales Tax, All Modes
(1)
$856,814,000
Number
of Years
10
Revenue
from 1
(2)
Penny
$5,940,811
Equivalent
(3)
Pennies
$0.144
Total
$856,814,000
10
$5,940,811
$0.144
1) Source: Community Transportation Plan (August 2015), 1/2 percent Local Option Sales Tax (used additional
fact sheets for project breakdown)
3) Cost of projects divided by number of years divided by revenue from 1 penny (Item 2) divided by 100
State Gas Tax Expenditures

In the calculation of the equivalent pennies of gas tax from the State, expenditures on
transportation capacity expansion spanning a 15-year period (from FY 2006 to FY 2020) were
reviewed. This period represents past FDOT Work Program expenditures from FY 2006-2015
and also includes the projected FDOT Work Program expenditures from 2016 to 2020. From
these, a list of improvements was developed, including lane additions, new road construction,
intersection improvements, interchanges, traffic signal projects, bike paths, sidewalks, capital
for fixed-route service, and other capacity-addition projects. The use of a 15-year period, for
purposes of developing a State credit for mobility capacity expansion projects, results in a
stable credit, as it accounts for the volatility in FDOT spending in the county over short periods
of time.
The total cost of the capacity-adding projects for the historical periods and the future
period:
FY 2006-2010 work plan equates to 12.0 pennies
The combined weighted average over the 15-year period of state expenditure for capacityadding mobility projects results in a total of 11.9 equivalent pennies. Table C-5 documents
this calculation. The specific projects that were used in the equivalent penny calculations are
summarized in Table C-11.
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
C-5
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table C5
State Fuel Tax Equivalent Pennies
Cost of
Projects
Source
Number
of Years
Revenue
from 1
(4)
Penny
Equivalent
(5)
Pennies
(1)
$403,971,497
$5,940,811
$0.136
Historical Work Program (FY 2011-2015)
(2)
$301,088,049
$5,940,811
$0.101
Historical Work Program (FY 2006-2010)
(3)
$357,039,868
$5,940,811
$0.120
Projected Work Program (FY 2016-2020)
Total
$1,062,099,414
15
$5,940,811
$0.119
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
C-6
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table C6
Hillsborough County Local Improvements (Historical & Future)
Project Number
C61035000
C61036000
C61037000
C61038000
C61043000
C61044000
C61045000
C61051000
C61052000
C61054000
C61057000
C61058000
C61060000
C61134000
C61149000
C61150000
C61151000
C63000000
C63002000
C63003000
C63073000
C63077000
C63090000
C63142000
C63320000
C63487000
C63520000
C63947000
C64037000
C65002000
C65004000
C69104000
C69110000
C69112000
C69117000
C69118000
C69120000
C69121000
C69123000
C69124000
C69125000
C69127000
C69345000
C69351000
C69359000
C69360000
C69361000
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
Project Title
Paved Shoulders/Bicycle Lanes County Rural Roads
131st St Improvements
Bearss Ave at BBD Improvements
Skipper Rd/46th St BBD to Fletcher
Bruce B. Downs (Pebble Creek To Pasco County) Road Widening
Bruce B. Downs (Palm Springs To Pebble Creek Drive South) Road Widening
Bruce B. Downs (Bearss Avenue To Palm Springs) Road Widening
US 301 Widening (Gibsonton Road To SR 674)
Lutz Lake Fern Rd (Suncoast Exp to Dale Mabry)
Hillsborough Ave Improvements - Town 'N Country Community Plan
Columbus Drive Extension
Cross Creek Blvd Rd Widening Phase II E. Cory Lake Blvd to Morris Bridge Rd
Orient Rd Widening - Hillsborough Ave to Broadway Ave
Citrus Park Drive Extension (Countryway Blvd to Sheldon Rd)
Big Bend Rd Widening (Covington Garden to Simmons Loop) - PD&E
Madison Ave Improvments - US 41 to 66th St
Old US 41 Roadway Improvements @ Archie Creek
Critical Accident Mitigation Intersection Improvements
Countywide School Traffic Signal Signs & Markings Program
Countywide School Traffic Safety Devices Program
New Traffic Signals
Lithia Pinecrest/Lumsden/Bell Shoals/Durant Intersection Improvements
Intersection and Pedestrian Safety Program
Riverview High School Driveway/Black Forest/Balm Intersection
Bloomingdale Ave and US 301 Intersection
Falkenburd Rd @ Leroy Ave Intersection Improvement
Orient Rd/Sligh Ave Traffic Signal
Bruce B. Downs Blvd & Pine Dr/University Square Dr Intersection Improvement
CDBG Funded Sidewalks
Waters Ave Area/Tropical Sports International Traffic Control Project
Waters Ave & Anderson Rd Adv Traveler Information Traffic Control Project
Boyette Rd (US 301 to Bell Shoals) Road Widening
Race Track Rd (Hillsborough - South Mobley)
Bell Shoals Rd Widening (Bloomingdale to Boyette)
Town N Country Community Plan - Paula and Ambassador Roads
Race Track Rd Widening Construction Phase I (Douglas to Linebaugh)
Race Track Rd Widening Construction Phase III (Linebaugh to Countryway)
Race Track Rd Widening Construction Phase IV (Hillsborough to Douglas)
Boyette Rd Widening Construction Phase II (Balm Riverview to Donneymoor)
Boyette Rd Widening Construction Phase III (Donneymoor to Bell Shoals)
Lithia Pinecrest Road Widening (SR 60 To CR 39)
Gornto Lake Rd Extension (Brandon Town Center to SR 60)
131St Ave/Holly Rd/Bruce B. Downs Blvd Intersection Improvements
Hanley Rd and Waters Ave Intersection Improvements
Himes & Lambright with Himes & Minnehaha Intersection Improvement
Gunn Highway and Linebaugh Ave Intersection Improvements
John Moore Rd/Parsons Ave & Lumsden Rd Intersection Improvements
FY 2011
$510,649
$0
$0
$0
-$41,625
$14,943,238
$580,710
$140,529
$4,733,177
$642
$351
$0
$0
$32,508
$1,389
$0
$0
$0
$69,670
$152,940
$317,463
$0
$753,679
$5,730
$35,558
$0
$18,108
$107,731
$0
$1,567
-$20,586
$324,760
$169,291
$137
$0
$197,644
$11,784
$1,827,768
$0
$1,631,915
-$201,326
$4,616,021
$158,331
$185,750
$83,853
$104,209
$55,586
C-7
FY 2012
$132,072
$0
$0
$0
$808
$14,241,588
$306,441
$126,018
$374,378
$0
$0
$0
$0
-$20
$190,681
$131,781
$24,143
$0
$4,427
$111,156
$149,877
$0
$232,900
$0
$0
$0
$67,696
$0
$0
$0
$0
$108,546
$24,488
$0
$100,000
$0
$0
$183,280
$103
$3,570,686
-$685,000
$176,495
$0
-$994
$0
$110,512
$86
FY 2013
$193,330
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,857,664
$832,573
$174,615
$638
$0
$0
$1,499,972
$0
$0
$96,736
$284,453
$365,110
$0
$0
$0
$101,510
$0
$354,761
$0
$0
$0
$17,321
$0
$21,761
$0
$0
$8,717
$3,850
$708
$0
$0
$0
$171,500
$0
$7,568,981
$0
$800,329
$0
$0
$0
$2,740
$0
FY 2014
$0
$110,686
$0
$33,792
$193,304
$228,439
$9,578,171
$159,216
$94
$0
$0
$0
$73,343
$169
$120,940
$329,207
$0
$0
$193,640
$0
$625,344
$0
$4,356,626
$0
$0
$0
$40,736
$62,500
$79,845
$0
$0
$39,292
$0
$123,260
$0
$500,000
$0
$0
$0
$6,673,660
$0
$280,567
$62,500
$0
$0
$16,227
$0
FY 2015
$1,151,345
$75,421
$3,966
$162,992
$669,622
$0
$5,520,993
$10,035
$0
$0
$0
$0
$112,418
$0
$0
$42,493
$0
$0
$0
$41,575
$833,209
$0
$435,564
$0
$0
$385,409
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,450
$0
$2,340,861
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$634,905
$0
$3,479
$0
$0
$0
$217,263
$0
FY 20162021
$2,908,745
$0
$650,000
$1,759,663
$15,348,246
$13,230,594
$59,840,742
$3,560,233
$0
$0
$0
$0
$85,911
$1,154,104
$16,219
$1,272,947
$0
$4,425,294
$0
$0
$901,568
$5,604,983
$398,020
$0
$0
$359,405
$547,728
$0
$0
$0
$0
$233,704
$0
$37,156,175
$0
$0
$0
$453,995
$0
$432,281
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,169,814
$0
Total
$4,896,141
$186,107
$653,966
$1,956,447
$16,170,355
$47,501,523
$76,659,630
$4,170,646
$5,108,287
$642
$351
$1,499,972
$271,672
$1,186,761
$425,965
$2,060,881
$389,253
$4,425,294
$267,737
$305,671
$2,928,971
$5,604,983
$6,531,550
$5,730
$35,558
$744,814
$691,589
$170,231
$101,606
$1,567
$20,586
$717,469
$197,629
$39,621,141
$100,000
$697,644
$11,784
$2,636,543
$103
$20,512,428
$886,326
$5,876,891
$220,831
$184,756
$83,853
$2,620,765
$55,672
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table C6 (Continued)
Hillsborough County Local Improvements (Historical & Future)
Project Number
Project Title
C69362000
Habana Ave & Waters Ave Intersection Improvements
C69363000
Boy Scout/Race Track Int Impr
C69600000
Intersection Improvement Program
C69601000
New & Improved Signalization Program
C69602000
Advanced Traffic Management System Improvement Program
C69603000
US 301 Widening Construction Phase 2 (Balm Rd To SR 674)
C69604000
Linebaugh Ave (Race Track Rd to Countryway)
C69606000
Fletcher Ave (Bruce B Downs Blvd to I-75) Widening
C69607000
CR 579 (Mango Rd) I-4 to Sligh Ave
C69611000
Telecom Parkway Extension (End to Morris Bridge Rd)
C69615000
Hartline - Northeast Hillsborough to Westshore BRT Improvements
C69616000
Hartline Park & Ride - Brandon
C69617000
Hartline Park & Ride - Fletcher Ave
C69618000
Hartline - I-75 North to South Corridor BRT Improvements
C69619000
Hartline Transit Signals
C69623000
Wheeler Street Re-Alignment - Plant City
C69625000
Turkey Creek Rd Improvements from MLK Blvd to Sydney Rd
C69628000
Westshore Blvd (Kennedy to Boy Scout)
C69999000
Proportionate Share Transportation Project
TOTAL
Source: Hillsborough County Department of Management and Budget and the Public Works Department
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
FY 2011
$80,899
$448,623
$232,998
$1,040,929
$8,777,963
$308
$294,159
$1,159,007
$0
$0
$318,688
$10,748
$2,112
$1,688,836
$161,565
$0
$0
$0
$0
$45,725,986
C-8
FY 2012
$692,006
$0
$13,787
$189,814
-$3,635,028
$1,088
$28,356
$179,158
$0
$0
$497,356
$63,400
$1,594,645
$1,149,550
$32,199
$0
$0
$0
$0
$20,488,479
FY 2013
$27,017
$0
$221,831
$164,915
$507,709
$2,276
-$1,045
$164,359
$0
$0
$409,257
$526
$73,944
$14,278,258
$656,256
$0
$0
$0
$0
$33,862,572
FY 2014
FY 2015
$0
$0
$682,635
$830,811
$571,698
$679
$9,448
$15,142
$0
$42,437
$451,429
$0
$33,398
$6,095,739
$223,868
$1,433,843
$0
$0
$0
$34,272,685
$0
$0
$666,012
$584,466
$813,003
$0
$0
$0
$6,269
$655,268
$0
$0
$0
$78,576
$0
$0
$0
$33,208
$0
$15,480,802
FY 20162021
$0
$0
$24,381,769
$10,510,110
$3,712,922
$659
$0
$0
$1,268,475
$946,717
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,637,157
$75,000
$1,056,466
$198,099,646
Total
$799,922
$448,623
$26,199,032
$13,321,045
$10,748,267
$5,010
$330,918
$1,517,666
$1,274,744
$1,644,422
$1,676,730
$74,674
$1,704,099
$23,290,959
$1,073,888
$1,433,843
$3,637,157
$108,208
$1,056,466
$347,930,170
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table C7
Hillsborough County; CIT Refunding Revenue Bonds; Series 2015
Year
Principal
Interest
2016
$5,202,076
2017
$2,480,000
$6,847,900
2018
$2,605,000
$6,758,600
2019
$13,970,000
$6,357,250
2020
$14,680,000
$5,641,000
2021
$15,420,000
$4,888,500
2022
$16,205,000
$4,097,876
2023
$17,085,000
$3,265,626
2024
$17,845,000
$2,392,376
2025
$18,705,000
$1,478,626
2026
$20,220,000
$505,500
Total
$139,215,000
$47,435,330
Percent for Transportation Capacity
Portion for Transportation Capacity
Total Debt
Service
$5,202,076
$9,327,900
$9,363,600
$20,327,250
$20,321,000
$20,308,500
$20,302,876
$20,350,626
$20,237,376
$20,183,626
$20,725,500
$186,650,330
55%
$102,657,682
Source: Hillsborough County Staff; refinancing of the 2007 bond from

the FY 2015 Adopted Budget, pg. 448
Table C8
Hillsborough County; CIT Refunding Revenue Bonds; Series 2012B
Year
Principal
Interest
2016
$3,820,000
$2,171,250
2017
$4,025,000
$1,980,250
2018
$4,210,000
$1,779,000
2019
$4,420,000
$1,568,500
2020
$4,645,000
$1,347,500
2021
$4,880,000
$1,115,250
2022
$5,130,000
$871,250
2023
$5,410,000
$614,750
2024
$5,640,000
$344,250
2025
$5,835,000
$175,050
Total
$48,015,000
$11,967,050
Total Debt
Service
$5,991,250
$6,005,250
$5,989,000
$5,988,500
$5,992,500
$5,995,250
$6,001,250
$6,024,750
$5,984,250
$6,010,050
$59,982,050
60%
$35,989,230
Source: Hillsborough County FY 2015 Adopted Budget, pg. 451
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
C-9
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table C9
Hillsborough County; CIP Refunding Revenue Bonds; Series 2012
Year
Principal
Interest
2016
$3,965,000
$2,815,500
2017
$4,160,000
$2,617,250
2018
$4,370,000
$2,409,250
2019
$4,590,000
$2,190,750
2020
$4,820,000
$1,961,250
2021
$5,060,000
$1,720,250
2022
$5,310,000
$1,467,250
2023
$5,575,000
$1,201,750
2024
$5,855,000
$923,000
2025
$6,150,000
$630,250
2026
$6,455,000
$322,750
Total
$56,310,000
$18,259,250
Total Debt
Service
$6,780,500
$6,777,250
$6,779,250
$6,780,750
$6,781,250
$6,780,250
$6,777,250
$6,776,750
$6,778,000
$6,780,250
$6,777,750
$74,569,250
93%
$69,349,403
Source: Hillsborough County FY 2015 Adopted Budget, pg. 452
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
C-10
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table C10
Community Transportation Plan: Percent Sales Tax Capacity Improvements
Plan
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
1/2 Cent
TOTAL
Project Description
City of Plant City New Sidewalks/Replacement/Maintenance
City of Tampa New Sidewalks
Hillsborough County New Sidewalks
City of Temple Terrace New Sidewalks/Replacement/Maintenance
City of Temple Terrace Trails (Bike Lanes/Multi-Use)
Hillsborough County Trails (Sun City Center Golf Cart Path)
Hillsborough County Sidewalks New/Gaps
City of Tampa; N. Occident St Ext. from Westshore Plaza to W. Cypress St
City of Tampa; Trask St Ext. from W. Cypress St to W. Gray St
City of Tampa; Reo St Widening from Gray St to Cypress St
City of Tampa; Trask St Widenting from Cypress St to Boyscout Blvd
City of Tampa; Interbay Blvd Widening from Manhattan Ave to Dale Mabry Hwy
City of Temple Terrace; Davis Rd from Harney Rd to Maislin Dr
Hillsborough County; 19th Ave NE PD&E
Hillsborough County; Orient Rd from Sligh Ave to Columbus Dr
Hillsborough County; Progress Blvd from Magnolia Park Blvd to Valleydale Dr
Hillsborough County; Big Bend Rd from US to I-75
Hillsborough County; Lithia-Pinecrest from Adelaide Ave to Lumsden Dr
Hillsborough County; Citrus Park Dr Ext. from Sheldon Rd to Country Way Blvd
Hillsborough County; Apollo Beach Blvd Overpass
City of Plant City Complete Streets
City of Tampa Complete Streets
City of Temple Terrace Complete Streets
Hillsborough County Complete Streets
Plant City Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS)
Hillsborough County Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS)
City of Tampa Intersection Improvements
City of Tampa Traffic Signal Intersection Updgrades
Hillsborough County Intersection Projects
Hillsborough County New & Improved Signals
Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (HART)
Hillsborough County South County & Brandon BRT
First 10 Years
$1,000,000
$3,750,000
$753,000
$301,000
$240,000
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$5,050,000
$8,600,000
$7,800,000
$2,500,000
$43,900,000
$17,700,000
$13,700,000
$97,000,000
$51,500,000
$9,000,000
$5,180,000
$31,900,000
$2,500,000
$43,230,000
$1,500,000
$5,170,000
$10,000,000
$6,000,000
$69,740,000
$10,000,000
$293,800,000
$100,000,000
$856,814,000
Source: 1/2 Percent Project List from Community Transportation Plan (August 2015)
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
C-11
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table C11
Hillsborough County FDOT Work Program
Item
Work Mix Description
427454-2
255893-3
255893-4
405525-2
435750-2
435750-1
415489-3
415489-1
255796-2
255709-2
255710-2
255734-1
255893-2
255340-1
255599-1
255888-1
255793-1
415489-2
255512-1
257839-1
257862-3
405492-2
405492-4
405492-5
257809-2
257809-3
257809-1
420625-1
437002-1
422695-1
433586-1
257862-2
430685-1
406631-1
427484-1
403763-1
255893-5
424213-3
424213-4
424213-6
429171-1
424213-1
426160-1
413092-1
432715-1
432714-1
436013-2
432716-1
436013-1
429464-1
426141-1
432717-1
424394-1
433763-1
433764-1
415014-1
436677-1
422737-1
408329-1
408109-1
415014-2
424396-1
415172-1
415172-2
435141-1
433535-3
ADD AUXILIARY LANE(S)

ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT
ADD LANES & REHABILITATE PVMNT
ADD LEFT TURN LANE(S)
ADD RIGHT TURN LANE(S)
ADD TURN LANE(S)
ATMS - ARTERIAL TRAFFIC MGMT
BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK
BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK
BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK
BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK
BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK
BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK
BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK
BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK
BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK
BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK
CAPITAL FOR FIXED ROUTE
FIXED GUIDEWAY IMPROVEMENTS
INTERCHANGE (NEW)
Item Description
US 301 (SR 43) NB FROM N OF BLOOMINGDALE AV TO NB I-75 ON RAMP
SR 574 (MLK BLVD) FROM E OF PARSONS AVE TO E OF KINGSWAY RD
SR 574 (MLK BLVD) FROM EAST OF KINGSWAY RD TO E OF MCINTOSH RD
SR 60 (ADAMO DR) FROM E OF US 301 TO W OF FALKENBURG RD
SR 60 FROM DOVER RD TO SR 39
SR 60 FROM VALRICO RD TO DOVER RD
US 301 (SR 43) FM SR 674/SUNCITY CTR BL TO CR 672/BALM ROAD
US 301 (SR 43) FROM S OF SUN CITY CENTER TO N OF GIBSONTON DR
US 301 FROM FOWLER AVE TO FUTURE SR 56
US 92 (SR 600) FROM KINGSWAY RD TO MCINTOSH RD
US 92 (SR 600) FROM MCINTOSH RD TO SR 566 (THONOTOSASSA)
22ND/20TH ST FROM MARITIME BLVD TO SR 60
SR 574 (MLK BLVD) FROM W OF HIGHVIEW RD TO E OF PARSONS AVE
SR 600 (HILLS AVE) FROM DALE MABRY HWY TO E OF ARMENIA AVE
SR 676 (CAUSEWAY BL) FROM 1/4 MI W OF US 41 TO 1/4 E OF US 301
US 301 (SR 41) FROM S OF SLIGH AVE TO S OF TPA BYPASS CANAL
US 301 (SR 41) FROM S OF TPA BYPASS CNL TO N OF FOWLER AVE
US 301 (SR 43) FROM S OF BALM RD TO N OF GIBSONTON DR
US 41 (SR 45) S OF APEX FLA/NEB SUNSET LANE
CR 39A (ALEXANDER) FROM US 92 (EASTBOUND) TO NORTH OF I-4 (SR 400)
CR 580/SAM ALLEN RD FM W OF SR39/BUCHMAN HWY TO E OF PARK RD
CR 581 (BB DOWNS BL) FROM PALM SPRINGS DR TO PEBBLE CREEK DR
CR 581 (BB DOWNS BL) FROM PEBBLE CREEK DR TO COUNTY LINE RD
CR 581 (BB DOWNS BL) FROM S OF BEARSS AVE TO S OF PALM SPRINGS BLVD
CR 585A (40TH ST) FROM DIANA ST TO HANLON ST
CR 585A (40TH ST) FROM HANLON ST TO N OF YUKON
CR 585A (40TH ST) FROM HILLSBOROUGH AVE TO DIANA ST
CROSS CREEK BLVD FROM W CORY LAKE BLVD TO MORRIS BRIDGE RD
MADISON AVENUE FROM US 41 TO 78TH STREET (CR 573)
TAMPA INT'L AIRPORT GEORGE BEAN PARKWAY
GATX DRIVE FROM MARITIME BOULEVARD TO GUY N VERGER BOULEVARD
PARK RD FROM I-4 (SR 400) TO SAM ALLEN RD
SR 574 (MLK BLVD) AT GALLAGHER ROAD
US 41 BUSINESS/SR685 AT HANNA AVENUE
US 92 (SR 600) DALE MABRY HIGHWAY AT WATROUS AVE
SR 574 (MLK BLVD) AT MCINTOSH RD
SR 574 (MLK BLVD) @ I-75 (SR 93A)
CITY OF TAMPA DOWNTOWN TAMPA ATMS 191 SIGNALS - PHASE 2
CITY OF TAMPA KENNEDY/HYDE PARK/DALE MABRY ATMS 142 SIGNALS- PHASE 3
CITY OF TAMPA USF AREA/BUSCH BLVD ATMS 119 SIGNALS - PHASE 4
COUNTYWIDE ATMS/ITS
CITY OF TAMPA TRAFFIC SIGNAL MANAGEMENT PHASE 1
SR 580 (HILLS AVE) FROM TOWN & COUNTRY BLVD TO AMBASSADOR DR
BAYSHORE BLVD FROM BAY TO BAY BLVD TO PLATT ST
BOUGAINVILLEA AVE FROM 30TH STREET TO 46TH STREET
CYPRESS STREET FROM SR 60/U-PATH TO N WESTSHORE BLVD
HYDE PARK AVE (SB-ONE WAY PAIR) FROM PLATT ST TO SR 60/KENNEDY BLVD
PALM AVENUE FROM NORTH BOULEVARD TO NEBRASKA AVENUE
PLANT AVE (NB-ONE WAY PAIR) FROM W PLATT ST TO SR 60/KENNEDY BLVD
ALEXANDER ELEM SCH FERN ST FROM OCCIDENT ST TO HESPERIDES
TEMPLE HEIGHTS ROAD FROM W OF OVERLOOK DR TO 56TH ST
WILLOW AVENUE FROM SWANN AVENUE TO MAIN STREET
HART (HILLS AREA REG IONAL TRANSIT)PARATRANSIT VAN ACQUIST SECTION 530
HART HILLSBOROUGH BUS LIVABILTY CAPITAL
HART HILLSBOROUGH STATE OF GOOD REPAIR CAPITAL
HART NORTHWEST TRANSIT CENTER URBAN TRANSIT CAPITAL
HART REGIONAL FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM/SURFACE TRANSPORTATION
HART SECTION 115: YBOR STATION INTERMODAL FACILITY
HART SECTION 5208
HART SECTION 5307
HART TAMPA BAY CENTER (SECTION 5307)
HART (HILLS AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT) TECO LINE STREETCAR EXT SE 129
HART FIXED GUIDEWAY SECTION 5309/5337
HART SEC. 5309: FIXED GUIDEWAY
HART TECO STREETCAR CAPITAL MAINTENANCE
SR 60 (SR 589) FROM N OF INDEPENDENCE TO I-275 AT WESTSHORE
FY 2006
$0
$0
$0
$734,190
$0
$0
$0
$72,645
$0
$0
$0
$4,069,421
$2,925,179
$6,000
$5,664,176
$482,219
$369,970
$0
$0
$692,748
$0
$112,000
$45,500
$89,250
$8,212,516
$462,298
$280,677
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,713
$0
$0
$0
$364,611
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$430,000
$0
$0
$454,420
$9,123,203
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
FY 2007
$0
$1,054,552
$0
$7,085
$0
$0
$0
$202,427
$0
$0
$0
$0
$6,958,780
$0
$42,387,362
$2,090,617
$1,803,643
$18,092
$0
$782,548
$0
$6,005,321
$1,156,750
$2,044,000
$811,000
$0
$29,338
$424,034
$0
$0
$0
$84,880
$0
$0
$0
$787,244
$466,854
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$28,846
$0
$9,080,454
$0
$0
$130,688
$130,688
$0
$0
FY 2008
$0
$11,222
$0
$17,504
$0
$0
$0
$2,420,329
$0
$0
$0
$0
$14,493,039
$0
$3,752,132
$894,055
$62,881
$24,747,580
$0
$69,697
$0
$0
$0
$0
$953,098
$8,516,849
$7,054,413
$0
$0
$791,271
$0
$313
$0
$459
$0
$31,846
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$404,592
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$153,077
$0
$0
$0
FY 2009
$0
$4,870
$0
$6,084
$0
$0
$0
$6,487,341
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,126,902
$0
$3,318,086
$5,922
$1,695,326
$279,827
$0
$0
$0
$19,251,175
$0
$0
$3,396,082
$4,900,012
$2,022,582
$0
$0
$0
$0
$59,863
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,858,292
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$9,616,025
$0
$1,960,000
$155,000
$0
$0
$0
FY 2010
$0
$10,353
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$24,671
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,438,742
$0
$3,939,330
$23
$56,212
$5,366,777
$0
$0
$0
$4,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,391,672
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,348,824
$0
$0
$0
$0
$99,613
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$221,338
$2,086,800
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$294,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$9,615,025
$0
$0
$308,077
$0
$0
$0
FY 2011
$34,460
$10,877
$909
$864
$0
$0
$603,229
$5,466
$0
$0
$0
$0
$206,155
$0
$951,357
$0
$383,417
$391,951
$0
$0
$2,662
$3,062,631
$0
$0
$2,704,760
$1,637,842
$0
$474,957
$0
$0
$0
$561,730
$1,241
$0
$435,687
$0
$1,002
$0
$0
$0
$1,500,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$596,442
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,973,308
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
FY 2012
$236,065
$580,271
$47,542
$1,081,028
$0
$0
$104,503
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7,472,958
$0
$215,544
$0
$994,689
$335,013
$0
$0
$2,746,591
$426
$0
$3,542,881
$0
$311
$2,636,951
$0
$0
$0
$0
$321,193
$7,511
$0
$18,027
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$526
$0
$73
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7,031
$89
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$11,300,000
$0
$0
$353,193
$0
$0
$0
FY 2013
$60,599
$2,607,705
$3,070,517
$124,090
$0
$0
$7,868
$10,122
$0
$0
$0
$0
$440,017
$0
$208
$0
$24,776,878
$67,811
$0
$0
$42,148
$86
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$947
$321,495
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,083,229
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$156,784
$22
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$11,560,727
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
FY 2014
$23,161
$10,243,753
$56,544
$304,555
$29,036
$29,265
$27,011
$518,490
$0
$0
$0
$0
$644,158
$0
$658
$0
$208,289
$27,002
$0
$0
$44,283
$75
$0
$26,214,991
$0
$0
$0
$896,921
$0
$0
$0
$0
$122,283
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$39,220
$0
$0
$155
$332
$0
$135
$0
$30
$0
$155
$0
$4,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
FY 2015
$818
$3,109,916
$388,153
$26,852
$6,211,402
$3,712,238
$3,571
$262,790
$868
$0
$0
$0
$25,431
$0
$10,563
$0
$993,574
$0
$338
$0
$638,274
$0
$5,000,141
$219,278
$0
$0
$0
$11,806
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,620,460
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,967,159
$0
$0
$94
$562,855
$0
$597,773
$0
$0
$0
$31
$0
$0
$4,700,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$15,800,000
$0
$0
$885,265
$0
$0
$0
FY 2016
$0
$5,152,973
$3,661,063
$17,457
$3,507
$3,048
$43,259,828
$2,464
$1,000
$659,380
$1,512,953
$0
$757
$0
$3,965,797
$0
$382,140
$0
$60,861
$0
$2,404,061
$0
$858
$6,608
$0
$0
$0
$693
$0
$0
$1,250,000
$0
$426,195
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$839,571
$0
$0
$387,800
$1,000
$169,200
$1,000
$259,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$29,057,222
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
FY 2017
$0
$0
$10,322,432
$20,530,961
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,500,000
$2,749,000
$4,047,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,695,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,075,000
$1,244,000
$1,134,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$450,600
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$16,528,240
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$605,000
FY 2018
$0
$0
$24,925,785
$400,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$23,731,789
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,473,593
$0
$0
$16,528,240
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
FY 2019
$0
$0
$933,605
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,000,000
$0
$0
$16,528,240
$0
$0
$0
$0
$880,006
$8,946,000
FY 2020
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,500,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$12,693,032
$12,405,570
$10,205,108
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Grand Total
$355,103
$22,786,492
$43,406,550
$23,250,670
$6,243,945
$3,744,551
$43,901,507
$10,111,248
$5,501,868
$3,408,380
$5,559,953
$4,069,421
$35,732,118
$6,000
$64,205,213
$3,472,836
$31,727,019
$31,234,053
$61,199
$1,544,993
$31,304,808
$32,431,714
$6,203,249
$32,117,008
$16,077,456
$15,517,312
$13,415,633
$1,808,411
$3,500,000
$791,271
$1,250,000
$3,388,463
$2,499,185
$459
$453,714
$1,183,701
$2,425,761
$13,768,032
$13,649,570
$11,339,108
$1,500,000
$4,929,705
$221,338
$2,491,465
$388,049
$564,187
$169,200
$598,908
$259,000
$163,845
$596,553
$450,786
$294,000
$4,000,000
$4,700,000
$430,000
$3,473,593
$28,846
$454,420
$165,710,684
$250,000
$1,960,000
$1,985,300
$130,688
$980,006
$9,551,000
Source: FDOT
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
C-12
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Item
425503-2
414594-1
416264-1
415348-2
403760-1
413387-1
433045-1
436530-1
433046-1
433047-1
433049-1
433048-1
255842-1
424450-1
437044-1
433071-1
433926-1
436012-1
433436-1
433071-2
433437-1
437041-1
255585-1
405492-8
435359-1
435360-1
434435-1
436031-1
422720-1
435912-1
435911-1
435908-1
430055-1
255822-1
255796-1
430050-1
430056-1
435918-1
435749-1
430054-1
435748-1
255893-1
405525-1
405492-1
410649-1
257862-1
435912-2
435911-2
435918-2
435748-2
402255-1
410948-1
426371-5
426371-1
426475-1
405428-1
405428-3
410693-2
405428-5
405428-6
434366-1
412751-1
414963-2
430175-1
421480-2
416114-1

INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT
INTERMODAL HUB CAPACITY
INTERSECTION (MINOR)
INTERSECTION (MINOR)
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT
NEW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
PARK AND RIDE LOTS
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PD&E/EMO STUDY
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
PTO STUDIES
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SHELTER
PURCHASE VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT
SIDEWALK
SIDEWALK
Item Description
SR 566/THONOTOSASSA FROM S OF TOWNSGATE CT TO N OF I-4
HART INTERMODAL FACILITIES
HART INTERMODAL TRANSIT CTRS
MULTIMODAL TERMINALS
US 301(SR41/FT KING) AT MCINTOSH RD
MEMORIAL HWY AT KELLY RD
US 41 SOUTHBOUND AT PEMBROKE RD WESTBOUND
USB 41/SR 685/N FLORIDA AVENUE AT CR 584/ W WATERS AVENUE
US 41 NORTHBOUND AT HARTFORD ST (WB)
US 41 NORTHBOUND AT RALEIGH (WESTBOUND)
US 41 NORTHBOUND AT S 34TH AVE (WESTBOUND)
US 41 NORTHBOUND AT TOWAWAY AVE (WB)
US 92 (SR 600) AT BAY TO BAY BLVD
US 92/SR 600/DALEMABRY FROM GOLD TRIANGLE ST TO N OF COLUMBUS
ARMENIA AVENUE AT BUSCH BOULEVARD
BROADWAY FROM US 41 TO N 62ND ST CSX INTRMD
FALKENBURG ROAD AT LEROY AVE/REEVES RD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT
GUNN HIGHWAY AT LINEBAUGH AVE
HARNEY ROAD AT 78TH ST/STEAMBOAT LANE
N 62ND STREET FROM CSX INTRMD ENTRANCE TO NORTH OF E COLUMBUS DRIVE
VALRICO ROAD AT SYDNEY ROAD
WESTSHORE BOULEVARD AND GANDY BOULEVARD
SR/CR 39 ALEXANDER FROM N OF I-4 (SR 400) TO N OF KNIGHTS GRIFFIN
CR 581 (BB DOWNS BL) FROM COMMERCE PALMS DR TO DONA MICHELLE DR
MARITIME BOULEVARD FROM GATX DRIVE TO CONTAINER YARD ENTRANC
PORTWIDE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT SUNRISE-EDTF SOUTH SHORE CORPORATE CTR TRANSP IMPROVEMENTS
TEMPLE TERRACE PARKWAY EXTENSION FROM TELECOM PKWY TO MORRIS BRIDGE RD
HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT (HART) PARK N' RIDE
SR 574 PD&E FROM MCINTOSH RD TO US 92/SR 600
SR 574 PD&E RE-EVAL FROM N 40TH ST TO I-4
SR 580 / BUSCH BLVD STUDY FROM N DALE MABRY HWY TO N NEBRASKA AVE
SR 60 FROM VALRICO RD TO POLK COUNTY LINE RD
SR 600 (GANDY BLVD) FROM E END OF BRIDGE TO DALE MABRY HWY
US 301 FROM FOWLER AVE TO FUTURE SR 56
US 301 FROM SR 60 TO I-4
US 41 FROM KRACKER AVE TO S OF CAUSEWAY BLVD
US 41 PD&E STUDY FROM MANATEE CO LINE TO SR 674
US 92 FROM I-4 TO COUNTY LINE
US 92/HILLSBOROUGH FROM 50TH ST TO I-4
US 92/SR 580/HILLSBOROUGH CORRIDOR EVALUATION FM MEMORIAL HWY TO I-275
SR 574 (MLK BLVD) FROM CR 579 TO MCINTOSH RD
SR 60 (ADAMO DR) FROM W OF 50TH ST TO FALKENBURG RD
CR 581 (BB DOWNS BL) FROM BEARSS AVE TO SR 54
EAST/WEST RD (COT) FROM I-275 TO CR 581 (BB DOWNS BLVD)
PARK RD/SAM ALLEN RD FROM I-4 (SR 400) TO ALEXANDER ST EXTENSION
SR 574 FROM MCINTOSH ROAD TO US 92 / SR 600
SR 574 FROM N 40TH ST TO I-4
US 41 FROM MANATEE COUNTY LINE TO SR 674
US 92/SR 580/HILLSBOROUGH AVE FROM MEMORIAL HIGHWAY TO I-275
HILLSBOROUGH CTY MPO TRANSIT PLANNING SECTION 5305
HART TRANSIT ENHANCEMENT
ARRA/HART SECTION 5307 (ARRA): FAREBOX REPLACEMENT/EXPAN
ARRA/HART SECTION 5307;ARRA BUSES & PARATRANSIT VANS
HART BUS ACQUISTION
HART BUS AND BUS FACILITIES SECTION 5309
HART BUS COALITION
HART BUS PURCHASES-TRANSIT CORRIDOR-CAPITAL
HART BUS/BUS FACILITIES
HART BUS/BUS FACILITIES SECTION 5309
HART SECTION 5339 CAPITAL ACTIVITIES
HART SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BUS PURCHASES
HART SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
TBARTA SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM / VANPOOL
SR 574 (MLK BLVD) FROM E OF HIMES AVE TO 350' W OF BURDINES DR
SR 580 (HILLS AVE) FROM BEAUMONT CTR BLVD TO HOOVER BLVD
FY 2006
$0
$0
$0
$0
$65,527
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$105,161
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8,634,955
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,725
$9,229
$0
$0
$3,873
$0
$0
$0
$0
$237,017
$600,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$900,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
FY 2007
$0
$0
$0
$0
$919,171
$199,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,246,694
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$11,279,753
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$27,931
$0
$431
$48,364
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$303,739
$0
$0
$0
$0
$451,440
$671,188
$0
$1,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$186
FY 2008
$0
$0
$0
$0
$18,874
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$74,516
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$245,569
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$182,694
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$324
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$328,533
$600,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,609
FY 2009
FY 2010
$0
$956,347
$82,260
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$22,606
$24,232
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$850,134
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$199,984
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$356,534
$0
$0
$0
$0
$489,060
$1,222,668
$0
$2,000,000
$0
$0
$3,000,000
$0
$0
$117,432
$274,733
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$128,121
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$345,315
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$455
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$383,560
$700,000
$450,000
$7,793,203
$2,185,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$247,500
$0
$0
$0
$0
$30,659
$34,474
FY 2011
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$155,171
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$17,535,504
$2,822,771
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$661
$0
$0
$0
$13,078
$0
$0
$11,893
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$385,777
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
FY 2012
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$117
$0
$117
$117
$0
$352
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$88,989
$26,729
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,224,357
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$15,705
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$408,063
$700,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
FY 2013
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$12,916
$0
$77,615
$71,282
$69,845
$69,788
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$154,856
$68,200
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$24,458
$0
$0
$719,518
$1,128,890
$0
$0
$10,242
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$414,654
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$12,000,000
$0
$0
$0
FY 2014
$11,823
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$559,639
$0
$27,047
$12,351
$9,776
$18,807
$0
$0
$0
$769,066
$602,392
$0
$800,000
$0
$241,565
$0
$376,218
$131,503
$0
$0
$3,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$18,599
$0
$0
$10,918
$8,781
$0
$0
$284
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$516,609
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
FY 2015
$2,214,202
$0
$0
$93,771
$0
$0
$4,134
$0
$345
$26
$169
$26
$0
$0
$0
$3,395
$12,502
$1,652,153
$364,608
$0
$10,335
$0
$134,184
$31,140
$0
$750,000
$0
$600,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$19,773
$0
$2,015,409
$17,246
$47,244
$0
$1,516,233
$0
$1,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$520,695
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$172,100
$0
$0
$1,297,193
$0
$10,000,000
$310,800
$0
$0
FY 2016
$14,679
$0
$0
$42,014,000
$0
$0
$1,618
$5,000
$5,296
$17,841
$16,562
$14,386
$0
$0
$0
$66,594
$240
$1,965
$4,003
$0
$509
$0
$0
$3,083
$1,250,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,000
$1,000
$1,000
$896
$0
$1,253
$534
$603
$1,501,000
$1,256
$0
$1,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,000
$0
$468,240
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,328,792
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
FY 2017
FY 2018
FY 2019
FY 2020
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,501,400
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$400,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,000,000
$1,000
$340,256
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8,200,000
$386,400
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,000
$0
$4,800,000
$350,463
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$6,300,000
$800,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$977,691
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,000
$2,000,000
$0
$0
$350,463
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,220,000
$800,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,350,111
$0
$1,361,815
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$360,978
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,000,000
$0
$0
$0
Grand Total
$2,240,704
$956,347
$82,260
$42,107,771
$1,003,572
$199,000
$578,424
$5,000
$110,420
$101,617
$96,352
$103,359
$1,448,977
$307,524
$977,691
$839,055
$615,134
$1,654,118
$1,168,611
$6,851,511
$252,409
$1,361,815
$39,645,477
$3,083,426
$1,250,000
$750,000
$3,000,000
$600,000
$382,678
$2,001,000
$1,001,000
$401,000
$1,288,744
$455
$2,016,662
$748,216
$1,198,596
$1,501,000
$1,517,489
$38,124
$1,001,000
$38,656
$9,229
$755
$48,364
$3,873
$4,002,000
$2,002,000
$4,001,000
$4,801,000
$5,725,581
$2,600,000
$450,000
$7,793,203
$2,185,000
$940,500
$1,893,856
$172,100
$3,900,000
$247,500
$2,625,985
$3,000,000
$45,720,000
$2,297,200
$148,091
$311,002
Source: FDOT
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
C-13
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Item
420627-1 SIDEWALK
416746-1 SIDEWALK
415234-4 SIDEWALK
426161-1 SIDEWALK
415234-9 SIDEWALK
415234-5 SIDEWALK
415234-7 SIDEWALK
428218-1 SIDEWALK
415004-1 SIDEWALK
408551-1 SIDEWALK
408550-1 SIDEWALK
257805-3 SIDEWALK
413128-1 SIDEWALK
413130-1 SIDEWALK
257805-5 SIDEWALK
413136-1 SIDEWALK
428160-1 SIDEWALK
428206-1 SIDEWALK
257805-7 SIDEWALK
405521-1 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES/SYSTEM
414990-1 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES/SYSTEM
436244-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPDATE
405920-4 TRAFFIC SIGNALS
420286-1 TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT
418685-1 URBAN CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
410768-1 PD&E/EMO STUDY
Grand Total
Item Description
SR 583/56TH ST FROM HILLSBOROUGH RIVER TO TEMPLE HEIGHTS RD
SR 585 (22ND ST) FROM 23RD AVE E TO LAKE AVE E
SR 597 (DALE MABRY) FM N CARROLLWOOD SPRINGS TO S OF NORTHDALE BLVD
SR 597 (DALE MABRY) FM W FLETCHER/S VILLAGE TO CAROLL SPRINGS/ZAMBITO
SR 597 (DALE MABRY) FROM N LAKEVIEW DRIVE TO SOUTH OF VAN DYKE RD
SR 597 (DALE MABRY) FROM NORTHDALE BLVD TO NORTHGREEN AVE
SR 597 (DALE MABRY) FROM NORTHGREEN AVE TO N LAKEVIEW DR
SR 60 FROM BRANDON TOWN CENTER TO GORNTO LAKE RD
CHARLIE GRIFFIN RD FROM JL REDMAN PKWAY TO PK SPRINGS APTS. ENTR.
CLAY PIT RD FROM SCOTLAND COURT TO A&A MOBILE HOME PARK
DANNY BRYAN BLVD FROM MLK BLVD TO PATINA ST
DOWNTOWN RIVERWALK AT PLATT ST BRIDGE
LITTLE RD FROM BLOOMINGDALE AVE TO DURANT RD
THONOTOSASSA RD FROM TAYLOR RD TO BAKER CREEK PARK
DOWNTOWN RIVERWALK FROM MACDILL PARK TO CURTIS HIXON WF PARK
MCMULLEN RD FROM BALM RIVERVIEW RD TO S BOYETTE RD
MENDONSA ROAD FROM ALEXANDER ST TO HUNTER ST
MULRENNAN MIDDLE SCH DURANT RD FRM ST CLOUD TO MULRENNAN
SELMON GREENWAY FROM HILLSBOROUGH RIVER TO 19TH STREET
CITY OF TAMPA TRAFFIC SURVEILLANCE
US 92 (SR 600) FROM CR 566 (THONOTOSSA) TO PARK RD
SR 582 / FOWLER AVE AT RAINTREE BLVD, GILLETTE AVE, N RIVERHILL DR
SR 60 (KENNEDY BLVD) FROM W OF ARMENIA AVE TO E OF BREVARD AVE
US 301/SR 43 AT RIVERVIEW DRIVE
US 92/SR 600 AT INTERBAY BLVD
US 92/SR 600/S DALE MABRY AT EL PRADO BLVD
USB 41 (SR 45/SR 60) FM W OF 14TH ST TO E OF 19TH ST
SR 597 (DALE MABRY) FROM HUMPHREY ST TO VAN DYKE RD
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT
US 41/92/SR 600/E HILLSBOROUGH AVE AT E GATE PLAZA/MERIDIAN POINTE APTS
SR 580 (HILLS AVE) AT SILVERMILL DR
SR 600 (HILLS AVE) WEST OF 22ND ST .05 MILES W OF 22ND ST
US 41 (SR 685) AT LAKE MAGDALENE BLVD
HANLEY RD AT PAULA DR
WHEELER ST TRACK IMPROVEMENTS
ARRA/HART SECTION 5307 (ARRA): TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENTS
ARRA/HART SECTION 5307 (ARRA): TECO STREETCAR EXP/CAP MAINT
ARRA/HART SECTION 5307;ARRA 21ST AVE IMPROVEMENTS
HART
HART
HART
HART (HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT SECTION 5307
HART JOBS ACCESS/REVERSE COMMUTE
HART PARK AND RIDE
HART SERVICE DEVELOPMENT
HART STREETCAR EXTENSION
HART STREETCAR EXTENSION
HART SURFACE TRANSPORTATION
HART SURFACE TRANSPORTATION
HART TRANSIT ENHANCEMENT
HART-NORTHDALE FLEX SERVICE
HART-TOWN-N-COUNTRY FLEX 60X
HILLSBOROUGH RURAL MAP 21 ADA
JAIL PROPERTY FROM MORGAN ST TO ORANGE AVE
SR 585 (21ST/22ND ST) FROM SR 60 (ADAMO DRIVE) TO SR 600 (HILLSBOROUGH)
HART BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) SECTION 5309
HART EMPHASIS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT SECTION 5309
HART NEW TAMPA FLEX
EAST/WEST RD AT I-275
FY 2006
$0
$257,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$448,148
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$829,751
$636,584
$0
$5,533
$286
$54,620
$10,159
$0
$0
$0
$0
$365,000
$3,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
$0
$0
$400,000
$0
$0
$0
$3,917,129
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$64
$59,342,497
FY 2007
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$138,733
$129,977
$600,000
$0
$529
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,174
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,174
$664,057
$0
$0
$177
$0
$230,000
$53,358
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$99,118
$200,000
$123,364
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,474
$94,878,235
FY 2008
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$143,689
$197,742
$0
$2,483
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,076,936
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$684,008
$0
$0
$5,045
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$68,936,379
FY 2009
$3,442,227
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$68,177
$61
$43,037
$0
$0
$0
$60,459
$18,160
$0
$11,149
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,195
$720,191
$0
$0
$280,690
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$900,000
$2,800,000
$0
$0
$0
$4,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$611
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$78,087,336
FY 2010
$0
$0
$0
$25,438
$0
$0
$0
$1,075
$0
$0
$0
$860,000
$0
$0
$0
$10,545
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$750,585
$0
$0
$6,132
$0
$0
$0
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,693,592
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,066,000
$332,310
$0
$4,500,000
$0
$55,795,421
FY 2011
$8,013
$624
$467,997
$884,532
$13,038
$259,612
$252,249
$134,917
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$251,011
$192,217
$101,520
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,745
$774,406
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$164,636
$0
$0
$0
$1,000,000
$0
$49,981,319
FY 2012
$0
$593,042
$34,624
$1,412
$296,449
$8,249
$381
$23,316
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$24,733
$144
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$772,347
$796,834
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$241,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$375,000
$606,000
$217,678
$0
$1,914,432
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$40,372,603
FY 2013
$0
$292,485
$1,101
$0
$432,051
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$171
$30
$1,431,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,952
$28,033
$823,027
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$241,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$19,565
$0
$0
$0
$5,500,000
$0
$67,924,932
FY 2014
$0
$25
$0
$0
$43,632
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$232
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,018
$0
$0
$0
$83,624
$11
$849,635
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$241,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7,743,813
$0
$0
$150,200
$0
$0
$59,668,070
FY 2015
$0
$0
$0
$0
$45,261
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$9,512,000
$0
$8
$0
$0
$0
$0
$148
$1,002,955
$894
$1,192
$148
$106,075
$0
$876,997
$306,764
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$400,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$351,350
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$83,141,125
FY 2016
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$218,750
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$68,915
$750,208
$28,048
$20,724
$34,818
$879,849
$0
$963,361
$935
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$241,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,557
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$143,417,951
FY 2017
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$72,000
$906,700
$138,000
$131,000
$44,000
$371,090
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$241,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$108,373
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$86,822,452
FY 2018
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$241,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$285,132
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$79,888,002
FY 2019
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,828,066
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$252,407
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$40,718,478
FY 2020
Grand Total
$0
$3,450,240
$0
$1,143,176
$0
$503,722
$0
$911,382
$0
$830,431
$0
$267,861
$0
$320,807
$0
$159,369
$0
$43,037
$0
$138,733
$0
$129,977
$0
$1,460,000
$0
$204,148
$0
$216,431
$0
$9,730,750
$0
$299,921
$0
$192,772
$0
$101,550
$0
$1,431,000
$0
$449,322
$0
$2,076,936
$0
$141,063
$0
$4,547,947
$0
$166,942
$0
$152,916
$0
$78,966
$0
$1,443,590
$0
$1,645,256
$0
$8,539,685
$0
$307,699
$0
$5,533
$0
$292,330
$0
$54,620
$0
$240,159
$0
$53,358
$0
$800,000
$0
$1,000,000
$0
$1,693,592
$0
$365,000
$0
$3,000,000
$248,000
$2,346,407
$0
$250,000
$0
$99,118
$0
$200,000
$0
$123,364
$0
$900,000
$0
$2,800,000
$0
$2,000,000
$0
$2,000,000
$0
$1,000,000
$0
$4,000,000
$0
$400,000
$0
$375,000
$0
$606,000
$0
$611,183
$0
$3,917,740
$0
$10,195,353
$0
$1,066,000
$0
$332,310
$0
$150,200
$0
$11,000,000
$0
$81,942
$53,124,614 $1,062,177,818
Source: Florida Department of Transportation, District 7
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
C-14
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table C12
Average Motor Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Excluding Interstate Travel
Travel
Other Arterial Rural

Other Rural
Other Urban
Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) @

21.4
6.3
304,792,000,000
45,625,000,000
299,027,000,000
30,471,000,000
89,623,000,000
1,476,377,000,000
350,417,000,000
329,498,000,000
1,566,000,000,000
Total
2,080,196,000,000
2,245,915,000,000

Other Rural
Other Urban
Total
165,719,000,000
Fuel Consumed
Gallons @ 21.4 mpg
Gallons @ 6.3 mpg
14,242,616,822
7,242,063,492
13,973,224,299
4,836,666,667
14,225,873,016
68,989,579,439
97,205,420,560
26,304,603,175
Percent VMT
@ 21.4 mpg
@ 6.3 mpg
87%
13%
91%
9%
94%
6%
21,484,680,314
18,809,890,966
83,215,452,455
93%
7%
Total Mileage and Fuel

2,245,915 miles (millions)
123,510 gallons (millions)
18.18 mpg
123,510,023,735
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics 2014, Section V, Table VM-1
Annual Vehicle Distance Traveled in Miles and Related Data - 2014 by Highway Category and Vehicle Type
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics.cfm
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
C-15
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table C13
Annual Vehicle Distance Travelled in Miles and Related Data 2014(1)
By Highway Category and Vehicle Type
Published December 2015
TABLE VM1
SUBTOTALS
YEAR
LIGHT DUTY
VEHICLES
ITEM
(2)
SHORT WB
MOTOR
CYCLES
BUSES
LIGHT DUTY
VEHICLES
(2)
LONG WB
SINGLEUNIT
(3)
TRUCKS
COMBINATION
TRUCKS
ALL LIGHT
(2)
VEHICLES
SINGLEUNIT 2AXLE
6TIRE OR MORE
AND COMBINATION
TRUCKS
ALL MOTOR
VEHICLES
Motor-Vehicle Travel:
(millions of vehicle-miles)
Interstate Rural
130,679
1,114
1,533
42,020
9,255
46,770
172,699
56,026
231,372
2014
217,799
2,681
2,022
86,993
16,330
29,295
304,792
45,625
355,119
2014
Other Rural
210,090
2,953
1,986
88,936
17,076
13,395
299,027
30,471
334,436
2014
All Rural
558,569
6,748
5,540
217,949
42,661
89,461
776,517
132,122
920,928
2014
2014
Interstate Urban
2014
Other Urban
2014
All Urban
(5)
2014
Total Rural and Urban
2014
Number of motor vehicles
2014
registered
Average miles traveled
per vehicle
364,071
2,422
2,373
93,591
16,498
40,889
457,661
57,387
519,843
1,149,432
10,800
8,085
326,945
50,143
39,480
1,476,377
89,623
1,584,885
1,513,503
13,221
10,458
420,536
66,641
80,369
1,934,038
147,010
2,104,728
2,072,071
19,970
15,999
638,484
109,301
169,830
2,710,556
279,132
3,025,656
187,554,928 8,417,718
872,027
52,600,309
8,328,759
2,577,197
240,155,238
10,905,956
260,350,938
(2)
2014
2014
2014
2014
(4)
Person-miles of travel
(millions)
Fuel consumed
(thousand gallons)
Average fuel consumption per
vehicle (gallons)
Average miles traveled per
gallon of fuel consumed
11,048
2,372
18,347
12,138
13,123
65,897
11,287
25,594
11,621
2,878,905
21,510
339,177
852,983
109,301
169,830
3,731,888
279,132
4,371,706
458,628 2,233,219
37,342,987
14,893,865
29,117,656
126,643,778
44,011,521
173,347,146
89,300,790
476
54
2,561
710
1,788
11,298
527
4,036
666
23.2
43.5
7.2
17.1
7.3
5.8
21.4
6.3
17.5
(1) The FHWA es tima tes na tiona l trends by us i ng Sta te reported Hi ghwa y Performa nce a nd Moni toring Sys tem (HPMS) da ta , fuel cons umption da ta (MF-21 a nd MF-27), vehi cl e regi s tra tion da ta (MV-1,
MV-9, a nd MV-10), other da ta s uch a s the R.L. Polk vehi cle da ta , a nd a hos t of model ing techniques . Sta rting wi th the 2009 VM-1, a n enha nced methodol ogy wa s us ed to provi de ti mely i ndi ca tors on
both tra vel a nd tra vel beha vi or cha nges .
(2) Li ght Duty Vehi cl es Short WB - pa s s enger ca rs , li ght trucks , va ns a nd s port util ity vehi cl es with a wheelba s e (WM) equa l to or les s tha n 121 inches . Light Duty Vehi cl es Long WB - l a rge pa s s enger
ca rs , va ns , pickup trucks , a nd s port/uti li ty vehi cl es with wheel ba s es (WB) la rger tha n 121 inches . All Light Duty Vehi cl es - pa s s enger ca rs , l ight trucks , va ns a nd s port uti li ty vehi cl es rega rdles s of
(3) Singl e-Uni t - s i ngl e fra me trucks tha t ha ve 2-Axl es a nd a t l ea s t 6 ti res or a gros s vehicl e wei ght ra ti ng exceedi ng 10,000 lbs .
(4) Vehi cl e occupa ncy is es tima ted by the FHWA from the 2009 Na ti ona l Hous ehold Tra vel Survey (NHTS); For s i ngl e unit truck a nd hea vy trucks , 1 motor vehi cl e mi le tra vell ed = 1 pers on-mil e tra vel ed.
(5) VMT da ta a re ba s ed on the la tes t HPMS da ta a va i la bl e; i t ma y not ma tch previous publi s hed res ults .
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
C-16
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
APPENDIX D
DRAFT
This appendix presents the detailed fee calculations for each land use in the Hillsborough
County mobility fee schedule. The differentiation of input variables is presented below:
Table D-1 Urban Area Mobility Fee; does NOT include additional percent sales tax
revenue credit
Table D-2 Rural Area Mobility Fee; does NOT include additional percent sales tax
revenue credit
Table D-3 Urban Area Mobility Fee; includes additional sales tax revenues credit
Table D-4 Rural Area Mobility Fee; includes additional sales tax revenue credit
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
D-1
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table D1
Gasoline Tax
Interest rate:
ITE LUC
Land Use
$0.206
25
2.50%
Unit
County Revenues:
State Revenues:
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source

Fuel Efficiency:
$0.087
$0.119
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
$4,962,000
12,350
18.18 mpg
365
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source

Cost per PMC:
12,350
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
36.6%
$401.78
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RESIDENTIAL:
210

du
2.62
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
5.50
1.30
7.15
$2,872
$39
$719
$2,153
$1,792
20%

du
3.96
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
8.31
1.30
10.80
$4,341
$58
$1,069
$3,272
$1,792
83%
6.11
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
12.82
1.30
16.67
$6,697
$90
$1,658
$5,039
$1,792
181%
7.81
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
16.39
1.30
21.31
$8,561
$115
$2,119
$6,442
$1,792
260%
8.76
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
18.38
1.30
23.89
$9,602
$129
$2,377
$7,225
$1,792
303%
2.38
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.85
1.30
5.01
$2,010
$28
$516
$1,494
$1,242
20%
3.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
5.82
1.30
7.57
$3,040
$42
$774
$2,266
$1,242
83%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
10.67
1.30
13.87
$5,573
$76
$1,400
$4,173
$1,242
236%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
2.41
1.30
3.13
$1,258
$17
$313
$945
$1,242
-24%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.64
1.30
4.73
$1,900
$26
$479
$1,421
$1,242
15%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
6.69
1.30
8.70
$3,496
$48
$884
$2,612
$1,242
110%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
9.31
1.30
12.10
$4,864
$67
$1,234
$3,630
$1,097
231%
100%
n/a
6.76
1.30
8.79
$3,530
$48
$884
$2,646
$1,097
141%

220
222/
223

du
du
du
du
du
6.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

du
1.49
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
2.25
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
4.14
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
5.76
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

230
du
du
du
du
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
ITE 9th Edition
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
4.17
FL Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
100%
n/a
6.08
1.30
7.90
$3,176
$44
$811
$2,365
$901
163%
du
2.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.08
3.58
Same as LUC 210
72%
FL Studies
1.58
1.30
2.05
$826
$12
$221
$605
n/a
n/a
232
du
4.18
240
Mobile Home Park
du
253

LODGING:
310
Hotel
room
6.36
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
6.26
6.76
FL Studies
66%
FL Studies
8.33
1.30
10.83
$4,351
$59
$1,087
$3,264
$1,546
111%
311
Hotel; All Suites
room
4.90
ITE 9th Edition
6.26
6.76
Same as LUC 310
66%
Same as LUC 310
6.42
1.30
8.35
$3,352
$45
$829
$2,523
$1,082
133%
320
Motel
RECREATION:
room
5.63
ITE 9th Edition
4.34
4.84
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
5.96
1.30
7.75
$3,115
$43
$792
$2,323
$1,579
47%
412
General Recreation
acre
2.28
ITE 9th Edition
5.11
5.61
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.32
1.30
4.32
$1,736
$24
$442
$1,294
n/a
n/a
1.62
ITE 9th Edition

(Adjusted)
100%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.36
1.30
3.07
$1,234
$17
$313
$921
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
5.59
1.30
7.27
$2,920
$39
$719
$2,201
n/a
n/a
416
420
RV Park
(3)
Marina
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
site
boat berth
2.96
ITE 9th Edition
4.60
6.62
5.10
7.12
Same as LUC 240

Same as LUC 210
D-2
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RECREATION:
430
Golf Course
hole
35.74
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
67.50
1.30
87.75
$35,257
$474
$8,733
$26,524
$4,272
521%
2.22
2.72
FL Studies
88%
FL Studies
66.04
1.30
85.85
$34,491
$528
$9,728
$24,763
$9,164
170%
444
Movie Theater
screen
106.63
Blend ITE 6th & FL

Studies
492
Health Club
INSTITUTIONS:
1,000 sf
32.93
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
94%
FL Studies
50.53
1.30
65.69
$26,395
$362
$6,670
$19,725
n/a
n/a
520
student
1.29
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
80%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.41
1.30
1.83
$735
$10
$184
$551
$61
803%
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.99
1.30
2.59
$1,038
$14
$258
$780
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.10
1.30
2.73
$1,096
$15
$276
$820
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.78
1.30
4.91
$1,973
$27
$497
$1,476
n/a
n/a
522
student
1.62
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
530
student
1.71
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
540

(Private)
550

(Private)
560
565
610
Church
1,000 sf
Hospital
Nursing Home
630
Clinic
OFFICE:
1,000 sf
(4)
(4)

710
student
1,000 sf
Day Care Center
620
student
2.00
1.50

6.62
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.83
1.30
3.68
$1,480
$20
$368
$1,112
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
10.14
1.30
13.18
$5,294
$75
$1,382
$3,912
$544
619%
73%
FL Studies
33.77
1.30
43.90
$17,637
$275
$5,067
$12,570
$1,500
738%
21.36
1.30
27.77
$11,158
$150
$2,764
$8,394
unit change
n/a
9.11
ITE 9th Edition
3.90
4.40
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
71.88
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.03
2.53
FL Studies
13.22
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
77%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.59
3.09
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
2.02
1.30
2.63
$1,053
$16
$295
$758
$194
291%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
93%
FL Studies
49.95
1.30
64.94
$26,088
$358
$6,596
$19,492
$1,880
937%
bed
2.76
1,000 sf
33.22
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
Blend ITE 9th & FL
Studies
1,000 sf
15.50
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
23.28
1.30
30.26
$12,160
$167
$3,077
$9,083
$3,728
144%
1,000 sf
13.13
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
19.72
1.30
25.64
$10,300
$141
$2,598
$7,702
$2,300
235%
(4)
1,000 sf
11.12
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
16.70
1.30
21.71
$8,724
$120
$2,211
$6,513
$1,958
233%
(4)
1,000 sf
9.41
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
14.13
1.30
18.37
$7,382
$101
$1,861
$5,521
$1,958
182%
1,000 sf
8.54
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
12.83
1.30
16.68
$6,700
$92
$1,695
$5,005
$1,958
156%
715
1,000 sf
11.65
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
17.50
1.30
22.75
$9,139
$125
$2,303
$6,836
$2,005
241%
720
1,000 sf
23.83
FL Studies
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
37.31
1.30
48.50
$19,489
$265
$4,882
$14,607
$6,262
133%
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
54.37
1.30
70.68
$28,396
$387
$7,130
$21,266
$6,262
240%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
25.90
1.30
33.67
$13,530
$204
$3,759
$9,771
$2,807
248%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
29.18
1.30
37.93
$15,240
$230
$4,238
$11,002
$3,384
225%
(4)
720

RETAIL:
1,000 sf
34.72
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
813
Discount Superstore
1,000 sf
50.82
ITE 9th Edition
815
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
57.24
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
D-3
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RETAIL:
820
(4)
(4)
(4)

841
(4)
New/Used Auto Sales
1,000 sfgla
86.56
ITE 9th equation
1.87
2.37
TL Regression
56%
FL Curve
28.73
1.30
37.35
$15,009
$238
$4,385
$10,624
$1,565
579%
1,000 sfgla
53.28
ITE 9th equation
2.40
2.90
TL Regression
67%
FL Curve
27.16
1.30
35.31
$14,185
$214
$3,943
$10,242
$3,181
222%
1,000 sfgla
41.80
ITE 9th equation
2.64
3.14
TL Regression
73%
FL Curve
25.54
1.30
33.20
$13,338
$198
$3,648
$9,690
$5,504
76%
1,000 sfgla
36.27
ITE 9th equation
2.87
3.37
TL Regression
76%
FL Curve
25.08
1.30
32.60
$13,099
$192
$3,537
$9,562
$5,504
74%
28.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
79%
FL Studies
32.54
1.30
42.30
$16,998
$235
$4,330
$12,668
$4,482
183%
1.51
2.01
FL Studies
28%
FL Studies
103.89
1.30
135.06
$54,263
$902
$16,619
$37,644
$7,581
397%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
21.31
1.30
27.70
$11,129
$168
$3,095
$8,034
$2,498
222%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
15.67
1.30
20.37
$8,184
$124
$2,285
$5,899
$2,095
182%
56%
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
14.95
1.30
19.44
$7,809
$124
$2,285
$5,524
$2,692
105%
1,000 sf
853
1,000 sf
775.14
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
857
Discount Club
1,000 sf
41.80
ITE 9th Edition
862
863

880/
881
890
Furniture Store
912
1,000 sf
30.74
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
45.04
ITE 9th Edition
1.87
2.37
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
1,000 sf
95.96
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.08
2.58
FL Studies
32%
FL Studies
20.25
1.30
26.33
$10,575
$164
$3,022
$7,553
$5,269
43%
1,000 sf
5.06
ITE 9th Edition
6.09
6.59
FL Studies
54%
FL Studies
5.27
1.30
6.85
$2,755
$37
$682
$2,073
$605
243%
159.34
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.46
2.96
FL Studies
46%
FL Studies
57.16
1.30
74.31
$29,855
$449
$8,273
$21,582
$15,850
36%
3.14
3.64
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
69.82
1.30
90.77
$36,470
$528
$9,728
$26,742
$10,752
149%
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
931
Quality Restaurant
1,000 sf
91.10
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
932
1,000 sf
116.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.17
3.67
FL Studies
71%
FL Studies
83.19
1.30
108.15
$43,452
$628
$11,571
$31,881
$7,790
309%
511.00
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.05
2.55
FL Studies
58%
FL Studies
192.60
1.30
250.38
$100,599
$1,563
$28,797
$71,802
$9,389
665%
31.43
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.62
4.12
FL Studies
72%
FL Studies
25.97
1.30
33.76
$13,564
$193
$3,556
$10,008
n/a
n/a
157.33
ITE 9th Edition

(944 & 946 Blend)
1.90
2.40
FL Studies
23%
FL Studies
21.79
1.30
28.33
$11,384
$180
$3,316
$8,068
$1,511
434%
service bay
43.94
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.18
2.68
FL Studies
68%
FL Studies
20.65
1.30
26.85
$10,785
$166
$3,058
$7,727
$6,455
20%
934
942
944/
946

1,000 sf
1,000 sf
fuel pos.
947

INDUSTRIAL:
110
1,000 sf
6.97
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
10.47
1.30
13.61
$5,468
$75
$1,382
$4,086
$1,208
238%
120
1,000 sf
1.50
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
2.25
1.30
2.93
$1,177
$16
$295
$882
$1,162
-24%
140
Manufacturing
1,000 sf
3.82
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.74
1.30
7.46
$2,997
$41
$755
$2,242
$1,162
93%
150
Warehousing
1,000 sf
3.56
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.35
1.30
6.96
$2,793
$38
$700
$2,093
$860
143%
2.15
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.60
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
92%
Same as LUC 710
1.94
1.30
2.52
$1,015
$15
$276
$739
$433
71%
151
Mini-Warehouse
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
3.10
D-4
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
92%
Same as LUC 710
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
1.30
3.28
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
$1,318
$18
$332
$986
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
INDUSTRIAL:
152
1)
2)
3)
4)
High-Cube Warehouse
1,000 sf
1.68
ITE 9th Edition
2.52
n/a
n/a
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
D-5
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table D2
Gasoline Tax
Interest rate:
ITE LUC
Land Use
$0.206
25
2.50%
Unit
County Revenues:
State Revenues:
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source

Fuel Efficiency:
$0.087
$0.119
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
$4,962,000
9,263
18.18 mpg
365
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source

10,806
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
36.6%
$535.71
$459.18
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RESIDENTIAL:
210

du
2.62
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
5.50
1.30
7.15
$3,829
$39
$719
$3,110
$1,792
74%

du
3.96
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
8.31
1.30
10.80
$5,787
$58
$1,069
$4,718
$1,792
163%
6.11
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
12.82
1.30
16.67
$8,930
$90
$1,658
$7,272
$1,792
306%
7.81
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
16.39
1.30
21.31
$11,414
$115
$2,119
$9,295
$1,792
419%
8.76
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
18.38
1.30
23.89
$12,802
$129
$2,377
$10,425
$1,792
482%
2.38
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.85
1.30
5.01
$2,680
$28
$516
$2,164
$1,242
74%
3.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
5.82
1.30
7.57
$4,053
$42
$774
$3,279
$1,242
164%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
10.67
1.30
13.87
$7,431
$76
$1,400
$6,031
$1,242
386%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
2.41
1.30
3.13
$1,678
$17
$313
$1,365
$1,242
10%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.64
1.30
4.73
$2,533
$26
$479
$2,054
$1,242
65%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
6.69
1.30
8.70
$4,661
$48
$884
$3,777
$1,242
204%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
9.31
1.30
12.10
$6,485
$67
$1,234
$5,251
$1,097
379%
100%
n/a
6.76
1.30
8.79
$4,706
$48
$884
$3,822
$1,097
248%

220
222/
223

du
du
du
du
du
6.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

du
1.49
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
2.25
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
4.14
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
5.76
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

230
du
du
du
du
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
ITE 9th Edition
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
4.17
FL Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
100%
n/a
6.08
1.30
7.90
$4,235
$44
$811
$3,424
$901
280%
du
2.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.08
3.58
Same as LUC 210
72%
FL Studies
1.58
1.30
2.05
$1,102
$12
$221
$881
n/a
n/a
232
du
4.18
240
Mobile Home Park
du
253

LODGING:
310
Hotel
room
6.36
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
6.26
6.76
FL Studies
66%
FL Studies
8.33
1.30
10.83
$4,972
$59
$1,087
$3,885
$1,546
151%
311
Hotel; All Suites
room
4.90
ITE 9th Edition
6.26
6.76
Same as LUC 310
66%
Same as LUC 310
6.42
1.30
8.35
$3,831
$45
$829
$3,002
$1,082
177%
320
Motel
RECREATION:
room
5.63
ITE 9th Edition
4.34
4.84
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
5.96
1.30
7.75
$3,560
$43
$792
$2,768
$1,579
75%
412
General Recreation
acre
2.28
ITE 9th Edition
5.11
5.61
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.32
1.30
4.32
$1,984
$24
$442
$1,542
n/a
n/a
1.62
ITE 9th Edition

(Adjusted)
100%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.36
1.30
3.07
$1,410
$17
$313
$1,097
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
5.59
1.30
7.27
$3,337
$39
$719
$2,618
n/a
n/a
416
420
RV Park
(3)
Marina
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
site
boat berth
2.96
ITE 9th Edition
4.60
6.62
5.10
7.12
Same as LUC 240

Same as LUC 210
D-6
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RECREATION:
430
Golf Course
hole
35.74
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
67.50
1.30
87.75
$40,294
$474
$8,733
$31,561
$4,272
639%
2.22
2.72
FL Studies
88%
FL Studies
66.04
1.30
85.85
$39,418
$528
$9,728
$29,690
$9,164
224%
444
Movie Theater
screen
106.63
Blend ITE 6th & FL

Studies
492
Health Club
INSTITUTIONS:
1,000 sf
32.93
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
94%
FL Studies
50.53
1.30
65.69
$30,166
$362
$6,670
$23,496
n/a
n/a
520
student
1.29
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
80%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.41
1.30
1.83
$840
$10
$184
$656
$61
975%
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.99
1.30
2.59
$1,186
$14
$258
$928
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.10
1.30
2.73
$1,252
$15
$276
$976
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.78
1.30
4.91
$2,255
$27
$497
$1,758
n/a
n/a
522
student
1.62
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
530
student
1.71
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
540

(Private)
student
2.00
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
550

(Private)
560
565
610
Church
1,000 sf
Day Care Center
1,000 sf
Hospital
620
Nursing Home
630
Clinic
OFFICE:
1,000 sf
(4)
(4)

710
student
1.50
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.83
1.30
3.68
$1,691
$20
$368
$1,323
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
10.14
1.30
13.18
$6,051
$75
$1,382
$4,669
$544
758%
73%
FL Studies
33.77
1.30
43.90
$20,156
$275
$5,067
$15,089
$1,500
906%
21.36
1.30
27.77
$12,752
$150
$2,764
$9,988
unit change
n/a
9.11
ITE 9th Edition
3.90
4.40
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
71.88
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.03
2.53
FL Studies
13.22
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
77%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.59
3.09
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
2.02
1.30
2.63
$1,204
$16
$295
$909
$194
369%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
93%
FL Studies
49.95
1.30
64.94
$29,815
$358
$6,596
$23,219
$1,880
1135%
bed
2.76
1,000 sf
33.22
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
Blend ITE 9th & FL
Studies
1,000 sf
15.50
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
23.28
1.30
30.26
$16,213
$167
$3,077
$13,136
$3,728
252%
1,000 sf
13.13
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
19.72
1.30
25.64
$13,734
$141
$2,598
$11,136
$2,300
384%
(4)
1,000 sf
11.12
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
16.70
1.30
21.71
$11,631
$120
$2,211
$9,420
$1,958
381%
(4)
1,000 sf
9.41
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
14.13
1.30
18.37
$9,843
$101
$1,861
$7,982
$1,958
308%
1,000 sf
8.54
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
12.83
1.30
16.68
$8,933
$92
$1,695
$7,238
$1,958
270%
715
1,000 sf
11.65
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
17.50
1.30
22.75
$12,186
$125
$2,303
$9,883
$2,005
393%
720
1,000 sf
23.83
FL Studies
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
37.31
1.30
48.50
$25,986
$265
$4,882
$21,104
$6,262
237%
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
54.37
1.30
70.68
$37,861
$387
$7,130
$30,731
$6,262
391%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
25.90
1.30
33.67
$15,463
$204
$3,759
$11,704
$2,807
317%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
29.18
1.30
37.93
$17,417
$230
$4,238
$13,179
$3,384
290%
(4)
720

RETAIL:
1,000 sf
34.72
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
813
Discount Superstore
1,000 sf
50.82
ITE 9th Edition
815
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
57.24
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
D-7
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RETAIL:
820
(4)
(4)
(4)

841
(4)
New/Used Auto Sales
1,000 sfgla
86.56
ITE 9th equation
1.87
2.37
TL Regression
56%
FL Curve
28.73
1.30
37.35
$17,153
$238
$4,385
$12,768
$1,565
716%
1,000 sfgla
53.28
ITE 9th equation
2.40
2.90
TL Regression
67%
FL Curve
27.16
1.30
35.31
$16,212
$214
$3,943
$12,269
$3,181
286%
1,000 sfgla
41.80
ITE 9th equation
2.64
3.14
TL Regression
73%
FL Curve
25.54
1.30
33.20
$15,244
$198
$3,648
$11,596
$5,504
111%
1,000 sfgla
36.27
ITE 9th equation
2.87
3.37
TL Regression
76%
FL Curve
25.08
1.30
32.60
$14,970
$192
$3,537
$11,433
$5,504
108%
28.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
79%
FL Studies
32.54
1.30
42.30
$19,426
$235
$4,330
$15,096
$4,482
237%
1.51
2.01
FL Studies
28%
FL Studies
103.89
1.30
135.06
$62,015
$902
$16,619
$45,396
$7,581
499%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
21.31
1.30
27.70
$12,719
$168
$3,095
$9,624
$2,498
285%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
15.67
1.30
20.37
$9,354
$124
$2,285
$7,069
$2,095
237%
56%
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
14.95
1.30
19.44
$8,925
$124
$2,285
$6,640
$2,692
147%
1,000 sf
853
1,000 sf
775.14
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
857
Discount Club
1,000 sf
41.80
ITE 9th Edition
862
863

880/
881
890
Furniture Store
912
1,000 sf
30.74
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
45.04
ITE 9th Edition
1.87
2.37
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
1,000 sf
95.96
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.08
2.58
FL Studies
32%
FL Studies
20.25
1.30
26.33
$12,086
$164
$3,022
$9,064
$5,269
72%
1,000 sf
5.06
ITE 9th Edition
6.09
6.59
FL Studies
54%
FL Studies
5.27
1.30
6.85
$3,149
$37
$682
$2,467
$605
308%
159.34
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.46
2.96
FL Studies
46%
FL Studies
57.16
1.30
74.31
$34,119
$449
$8,273
$25,846
$15,850
63%
3.14
3.64
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
69.82
1.30
90.77
$41,680
$528
$9,728
$31,952
$10,752
197%
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
931
Quality Restaurant
1,000 sf
91.10
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
932
1,000 sf
116.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.17
3.67
FL Studies
71%
FL Studies
83.19
1.30
108.15
$49,659
$628
$11,571
$38,088
$7,790
389%
511.00
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.05
2.55
FL Studies
58%
FL Studies
192.60
1.30
250.38
$114,971
$1,563
$28,797
$86,174
$9,389
818%
31.43
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.62
4.12
FL Studies
72%
FL Studies
25.97
1.30
33.76
$15,501
$193
$3,556
$11,945
n/a
n/a
157.33
ITE 9th Edition

(944 & 946 Blend)
1.90
2.40
FL Studies
23%
FL Studies
21.79
1.30
28.33
$13,010
$180
$3,316
$9,694
$1,511
542%
service bay
43.94
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.18
2.68
FL Studies
68%
FL Studies
20.65
1.30
26.85
$12,326
$166
$3,058
$9,268
$6,455
44%
934
942
944/
946

1,000 sf
1,000 sf
fuel pos.
947

INDUSTRIAL:
110
1,000 sf
6.97
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
10.47
1.30
13.61
$7,291
$75
$1,382
$5,909
$1,208
389%
120
1,000 sf
1.50
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
2.25
1.30
2.93
$1,569
$16
$295
$1,274
$1,162
10%
140
Manufacturing
1,000 sf
3.82
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.74
1.30
7.46
$3,996
$41
$755
$3,241
$1,162
179%
150
Warehousing
1,000 sf
3.56
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.35
1.30
6.96
$3,724
$38
$700
$3,024
$860
252%
2.15
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.60
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
92%
Same as LUC 710
1.94
1.30
2.52
$1,354
$15
$276
$1,078
$433
149%
151
Mini-Warehouse
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
3.10
D-8
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
92%
Same as LUC 710
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
1.30
3.28
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
$1,757
$18
$332
$1,425
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
INDUSTRIAL:
152
1)
2)
3)
4)
High-Cube Warehouse
1,000 sf
1.68
ITE 9th Edition
2.52
n/a
n/a
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
D-9
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table D3
Gasoline Tax
Interest rate:
ITE LUC
Land Use
$0.350
25
2.50%
Unit
County Revenues:
State Revenues:
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source

Fuel Efficiency:
$0.231
$0.119
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
$4,962,000
12,350
18.18 mpg
365
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source

Cost per PMC:
12,350
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
36.6%
$401.78
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RESIDENTIAL:
210

du
2.62
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
5.50
1.30
7.15
$2,872
$66
$1,216
$1,656
$1,792
-8%

du
3.96
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
8.31
1.30
10.80
$4,341
$99
$1,824
$2,517
$1,792
40%
6.11
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
12.82
1.30
16.67
$6,697
$153
$2,819
$3,878
$1,792
116%
7.81
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
16.39
1.30
21.31
$8,561
$195
$3,593
$4,968
$1,792
177%
8.76
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
18.38
1.30
23.89
$9,602
$219
$4,035
$5,567
$1,792
211%
2.38
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.85
1.30
5.01
$2,010
$47
$866
$1,144
$1,242
-8%
3.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
5.82
1.30
7.57
$3,040
$71
$1,308
$1,732
$1,242
40%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
10.67
1.30
13.87
$5,573
$130
$2,395
$3,178
$1,242
156%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
2.41
1.30
3.13
$1,258
$29
$534
$724
$1,242
-42%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.64
1.30
4.73
$1,900
$44
$811
$1,089
$1,242
-12%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
6.69
1.30
8.70
$3,496
$81
$1,492
$2,004
$1,242
61%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
9.31
1.30
12.10
$4,864
$113
$2,082
$2,782
$1,097
154%
100%
n/a
6.76
1.30
8.79
$3,530
$82
$1,511
$2,019
$1,097
84%

220
222/
223

du
du
du
du
du
6.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

du
1.49
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
2.25
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
4.14
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
5.76
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

230
du
du
du
du
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
ITE 9th Edition
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
4.17
FL Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
100%
n/a
6.08
1.30
7.90
$3,176
$75
$1,382
$1,794
$901
99%
du
2.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.08
3.58
Same as LUC 210
72%
FL Studies
1.58
1.30
2.05
$826
$20
$368
$458
n/a
n/a
232
du
4.18
240
Mobile Home Park
du
253

LODGING:
310
Hotel
room
6.36
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
6.26
6.76
FL Studies
66%
FL Studies
8.33
1.30
10.83
$4,351
$100
$1,842
$2,509
$1,546
62%
311
Hotel; All Suites
room
4.90
ITE 9th Edition
6.26
6.76
Same as LUC 310
66%
Same as LUC 310
6.42
1.30
8.35
$3,352
$77
$1,419
$1,933
$1,082
79%
320
Motel
RECREATION:
room
5.63
ITE 9th Edition
4.34
4.84
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
5.96
1.30
7.75
$3,115
$74
$1,363
$1,752
$1,579
11%
412
General Recreation
acre
2.28
ITE 9th Edition
5.11
5.61
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.32
1.30
4.32
$1,736
$40
$737
$999
n/a
n/a
1.62
ITE 9th Edition

(Adjusted)
100%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.36
1.30
3.07
$1,234
$29
$534
$700
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
5.59
1.30
7.27
$2,920
$67
$1,234
$1,686
n/a
n/a
416
420
RV Park
(3)
Marina
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
site
boat berth
2.96
ITE 9th Edition
4.60
6.62
5.10
7.12
Same as LUC 240

Same as LUC 210
D-10
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RECREATION:
430
Golf Course
hole
35.74
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
67.50
1.30
87.75
$35,257
$805
$14,832
$20,425
$4,272
378%
2.22
2.72
FL Studies
88%
FL Studies
66.04
1.30
85.85
$34,491
$897
$16,527
$17,964
$9,164
96%
444
Movie Theater
screen
106.63
Blend ITE 6th & FL

Studies
492
Health Club
INSTITUTIONS:
1,000 sf
32.93
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
94%
FL Studies
50.53
1.30
65.69
$26,395
$614
$11,313
$15,082
n/a
n/a
520
student
1.29
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
80%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.41
1.30
1.83
$735
$17
$313
$422
$61
592%
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.99
1.30
2.59
$1,038
$25
$461
$577
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.10
1.30
2.73
$1,096
$26
$479
$617
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.78
1.30
4.91
$1,973
$45
$829
$1,144
n/a
n/a
522
student
1.62
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
530
student
1.71
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
540

(Private)
student
2.00
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
550

(Private)
560
565
610
Church
1,000 sf
Day Care Center
1,000 sf
Hospital
620
Nursing Home
630
Clinic
OFFICE:
1,000 sf
(4)
(4)

710
student
1.50
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.83
1.30
3.68
$1,480
$34
$626
$854
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
10.14
1.30
13.18
$5,294
$127
$2,340
$2,954
$544
443%
73%
FL Studies
33.77
1.30
43.90
$17,637
$466
$8,586
$9,051
$1,500
503%
21.36
1.30
27.77
$11,158
$255
$4,698
$6,460
unit change
n/a
9.11
ITE 9th Edition
3.90
4.40
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
71.88
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.03
2.53
FL Studies
13.22
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
77%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.59
3.09
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
2.02
1.30
2.63
$1,053
$27
$497
$556
$194
187%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
93%
FL Studies
49.95
1.30
64.94
$26,088
$608
$11,202
$14,886
$1,880
692%
bed
2.76
1,000 sf
33.22
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
Blend ITE 9th & FL
Studies
1,000 sf
15.50
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
23.28
1.30
30.26
$12,160
$283
$5,214
$6,946
$3,728
86%
1,000 sf
13.13
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
19.72
1.30
25.64
$10,300
$240
$4,422
$5,878
$2,300
156%
(4)
1,000 sf
11.12
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
16.70
1.30
21.71
$8,724
$203
$3,740
$4,984
$1,958
155%
(4)
1,000 sf
9.41
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
14.13
1.30
18.37
$7,382
$172
$3,169
$4,213
$1,958
115%
1,000 sf
8.54
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
12.83
1.30
16.68
$6,700
$156
$2,874
$3,826
$1,958
95%
715
1,000 sf
11.65
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
17.50
1.30
22.75
$9,139
$213
$3,924
$5,215
$2,005
160%
720
1,000 sf
23.83
FL Studies
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
37.31
1.30
48.50
$19,489
$451
$8,309
$11,180
$6,262
79%
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
54.37
1.30
70.68
$28,396
$657
$12,105
$16,291
$6,262
160%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
25.90
1.30
33.67
$13,530
$347
$6,393
$7,137
$2,807
154%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
29.18
1.30
37.93
$15,240
$391
$7,204
$8,036
$3,384
138%
(4)
720

RETAIL:
1,000 sf
34.72
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
813
Discount Superstore
1,000 sf
50.82
ITE 9th Edition
815
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
57.24
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
D-11
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RETAIL:
820
(4)
(4)
(4)

841
(4)
New/Used Auto Sales
1,000 sfgla
86.56
ITE 9th equation
1.87
2.37
TL Regression
56%
FL Curve
28.73
1.30
37.35
$15,009
$404
$7,443
$7,566
$1,565
384%
1,000 sfgla
53.28
ITE 9th equation
2.40
2.90
TL Regression
67%
FL Curve
27.16
1.30
35.31
$14,185
$364
$6,706
$7,479
$3,181
135%
1,000 sfgla
41.80
ITE 9th equation
2.64
3.14
TL Regression
73%
FL Curve
25.54
1.30
33.20
$13,338
$337
$6,209
$7,129
$5,504
30%
1,000 sfgla
36.27
ITE 9th equation
2.87
3.37
TL Regression
76%
FL Curve
25.08
1.30
32.60
$13,099
$326
$6,006
$7,093
$5,504
29%
28.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
79%
FL Studies
32.54
1.30
42.30
$16,998
$400
$7,370
$9,628
$4,482
115%
1.51
2.01
FL Studies
28%
FL Studies
103.89
1.30
135.06
$54,263
$1,533
$28,245
$26,018
$7,581
243%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
21.31
1.30
27.70
$11,129
$285
$5,251
$5,878
$2,498
135%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
15.67
1.30
20.37
$8,184
$210
$3,869
$4,315
$2,095
106%
56%
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
14.95
1.30
19.44
$7,809
$210
$3,869
$3,940
$2,692
46%
1,000 sf
853
1,000 sf
775.14
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
857
Discount Club
1,000 sf
41.80
ITE 9th Edition
862
863

880/
881
890
Furniture Store
912
1,000 sf
30.74
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
45.04
ITE 9th Edition
1.87
2.37
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
1,000 sf
95.96
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.08
2.58
FL Studies
32%
FL Studies
20.25
1.30
26.33
$10,575
$278
$5,122
$5,453
$5,269
4%
1,000 sf
5.06
ITE 9th Edition
6.09
6.59
FL Studies
54%
FL Studies
5.27
1.30
6.85
$2,755
$63
$1,161
$1,594
$605
164%
159.34
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.46
2.96
FL Studies
46%
FL Studies
57.16
1.30
74.31
$29,855
$762
$14,039
$15,816
$15,850
0%
3.14
3.64
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
69.82
1.30
90.77
$36,470
$897
$16,527
$19,943
$10,752
86%
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
931
Quality Restaurant
1,000 sf
91.10
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
932
1,000 sf
116.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.17
3.67
FL Studies
71%
FL Studies
83.19
1.30
108.15
$43,452
$1,067
$19,659
$23,793
$7,790
205%
511.00
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.05
2.55
FL Studies
58%
FL Studies
192.60
1.30
250.38
$100,599
$2,655
$48,917
$51,682
$9,389
451%
31.43
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.62
4.12
FL Studies
72%
FL Studies
25.97
1.30
33.76
$13,564
$328
$6,043
$7,521
n/a
n/a
157.33
ITE 9th Edition

(944 & 946 Blend)
1.90
2.40
FL Studies
23%
FL Studies
21.79
1.30
28.33
$11,384
$305
$5,619
$5,765
$1,511
282%
service bay
43.94
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.18
2.68
FL Studies
68%
FL Studies
20.65
1.30
26.85
$10,785
$281
$5,177
$5,608
$6,455
-13%
934
942
944/
946

1,000 sf
1,000 sf
fuel pos.
947

INDUSTRIAL:
110
1,000 sf
6.97
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
10.47
1.30
13.61
$5,468
$127
$2,340
$3,128
$1,208
159%
120
1,000 sf
1.50
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
2.25
1.30
2.93
$1,177
$27
$497
$680
$1,162
-42%
140
Manufacturing
1,000 sf
3.82
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.74
1.30
7.46
$2,997
$70
$1,290
$1,707
$1,162
47%
150
Warehousing
1,000 sf
3.56
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.35
1.30
6.96
$2,793
$65
$1,198
$1,595
$860
86%
2.15
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.60
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
92%
Same as LUC 710
1.94
1.30
2.52
$1,015
$25
$461
$554
$433
28%
151
Mini-Warehouse
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
3.10
D-12
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
92%
Same as LUC 710
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
1.30
3.28
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
$1,318
$31
$571
$747
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
INDUSTRIAL:
152
1)
2)
3)
4)
High-Cube Warehouse
1,000 sf
1.68
ITE 9th Edition
2.52
n/a
n/a
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
D-13
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
Table D4
Gasoline Tax
Interest rate:
ITE LUC
Land Use
$0.350
25
2.50%
Unit
County Revenues:
State Revenues:
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source

Fuel Efficiency:
$0.231
$0.119
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
$4,962,000
9,263
18.18 mpg
365
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source

10,806
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
36.6%
$535.71
$459.18
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RESIDENTIAL:
210

du
2.62
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
5.50
1.30
7.15
$3,829
$66
$1,216
$2,613
$1,792
46%

du
3.96
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
8.31
1.30
10.80
$5,787
$99
$1,824
$3,963
$1,792
121%
6.11
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
12.82
1.30
16.67
$8,930
$153
$2,819
$6,111
$1,792
241%
7.81
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
16.39
1.30
21.31
$11,414
$195
$3,593
$7,821
$1,792
336%
8.76
FL Studies
(NHTS, AHS, Census)
6.62
7.12
FL Studies
100%
n/a
18.38
1.30
23.89
$12,802
$219
$4,035
$8,767
$1,792
389%
2.38
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.85
1.30
5.01
$2,680
$47
$866
$1,814
$1,242
46%
3.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
5.82
1.30
7.57
$4,053
$71
$1,308
$2,745
$1,242
121%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
10.67
1.30
13.87
$7,431
$130
$2,395
$5,036
$1,242
306%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
2.41
1.30
3.13
$1,678
$29
$534
$1,144
$1,242
-8%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
3.64
1.30
4.73
$2,533
$44
$811
$1,722
$1,242
39%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
6.69
1.30
8.70
$4,661
$81
$1,492
$3,169
$1,242
155%
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
100%
n/a
9.31
1.30
12.10
$6,485
$113
$2,082
$4,403
$1,097
301%
100%
n/a
6.76
1.30
8.79
$4,706
$82
$1,511
$3,195
$1,097
191%

220
222/
223

du
du
du
du
du
6.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

du
1.49
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
2.25
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
4.14
ITE 9th Edition

(weighted avg)
5.76
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies

230
du
du
du
du
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.10
ITE 9th Edition
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
(LUC 220/230)
4.17
FL Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
100%
n/a
6.08
1.30
7.90
$4,235
$75
$1,382
$2,853
$901
217%
du
2.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.08
3.58
Same as LUC 210
72%
FL Studies
1.58
1.30
2.05
$1,102
$20
$368
$734
n/a
n/a
232
du
4.18
240
Mobile Home Park
du
253

LODGING:
310
Hotel
room
6.36
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
6.26
6.76
FL Studies
66%
FL Studies
8.33
1.30
10.83
$4,972
$100
$1,842
$3,130
$1,546
103%
311
Hotel; All Suites
room
4.90
ITE 9th Edition
6.26
6.76
Same as LUC 310
66%
Same as LUC 310
6.42
1.30
8.35
$3,831
$77
$1,419
$2,412
$1,082
123%
320
Motel
RECREATION:
room
5.63
ITE 9th Edition
4.34
4.84
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
5.96
1.30
7.75
$3,560
$74
$1,363
$2,197
$1,579
39%
412
General Recreation
acre
2.28
ITE 9th Edition
5.11
5.61
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.32
1.30
4.32
$1,984
$40
$737
$1,247
n/a
n/a
1.62
ITE 9th Edition

(Adjusted)
100%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.36
1.30
3.07
$1,410
$29
$534
$876
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
5.59
1.30
7.27
$3,337
$67
$1,234
$2,103
n/a
n/a
416
420
RV Park
(3)
Marina
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
site
boat berth
2.96
ITE 9th Edition
4.60
6.62
5.10
7.12
Same as LUC 240

Same as LUC 210
D-14
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RECREATION:
430
Golf Course
hole
35.74
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
67.50
1.30
87.75
$40,294
$805
$14,832
$25,462
$4,272
496%
2.22
2.72
FL Studies
88%
FL Studies
66.04
1.30
85.85
$39,418
$897
$16,527
$22,891
$9,164
150%
444
Movie Theater
screen
106.63
Blend ITE 6th & FL

Studies
492
Health Club
INSTITUTIONS:
1,000 sf
32.93
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
94%
FL Studies
50.53
1.30
65.69
$30,166
$614
$11,313
$18,853
n/a
n/a
520
student
1.29
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
80%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.41
1.30
1.83
$840
$17
$313
$527
$61
764%
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
1.99
1.30
2.59
$1,186
$25
$461
$725
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.10
1.30
2.73
$1,252
$26
$479
$773
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
3.78
1.30
4.91
$2,255
$45
$829
$1,426
n/a
n/a
522
student
1.62
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
530
student
1.71
ITE 9th Edition
4.30
4.80
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
540

(Private)
student
2.00
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
550

(Private)
560
565
610
Church
1,000 sf
Day Care Center
1,000 sf
Hospital
620
Nursing Home
630
Clinic
OFFICE:
1,000 sf
(4)
(4)

710
student
1.50
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.83
1.30
3.68
$1,691
$34
$626
$1,065
n/a
n/a
90%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
10.14
1.30
13.18
$6,051
$127
$2,340
$3,711
$544
582%
73%
FL Studies
33.77
1.30
43.90
$20,156
$466
$8,586
$11,570
$1,500
671%
21.36
1.30
27.77
$12,752
$255
$4,698
$8,054
unit change
n/a
9.11
ITE 9th Edition
3.90
4.40
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
71.88
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.03
2.53
FL Studies
13.22
ITE 9th Edition
6.62
7.12
Same as LUC 210
77%
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
2.59
3.09
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
2.02
1.30
2.63
$1,204
$27
$497
$707
$194
264%
5.10
5.60
FL Studies
93%
FL Studies
49.95
1.30
64.94
$29,815
$608
$11,202
$18,613
$1,880
890%
bed
2.76
1,000 sf
33.22
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
Blend ITE 9th & FL
Studies
1,000 sf
15.50
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
23.28
1.30
30.26
$16,213
$283
$5,214
$10,999
$3,728
195%
1,000 sf
13.13
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
19.72
1.30
25.64
$13,734
$240
$4,422
$9,312
$2,300
305%
(4)
1,000 sf
11.12
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
16.70
1.30
21.71
$11,631
$203
$3,740
$7,891
$1,958
303%
(4)
1,000 sf
9.41
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
14.13
1.30
18.37
$9,843
$172
$3,169
$6,674
$1,958
241%
1,000 sf
8.54
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
FL Studies
92%
FL Studies
12.83
1.30
16.68
$8,933
$156
$2,874
$6,059
$1,958
209%
715
1,000 sf
11.65
ITE 9th equation
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
17.50
1.30
22.75
$12,186
$213
$3,924
$8,262
$2,005
312%
720
1,000 sf
23.83
FL Studies
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
37.31
1.30
48.50
$25,986
$451
$8,309
$17,677
$6,262
182%
5.55
6.05
FL Studies
89%
FL Studies
54.37
1.30
70.68
$37,861
$657
$12,105
$25,756
$6,262
311%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
25.90
1.30
33.67
$15,463
$347
$6,393
$9,070
$2,807
223%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
29.18
1.30
37.93
$17,417
$391
$7,204
$10,213
$3,384
202%
(4)
720

RETAIL:
1,000 sf
34.72
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
813
Discount Superstore
1,000 sf
50.82
ITE 9th Edition
815
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
57.24
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
D-15
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
RETAIL:
820
(4)
(4)
(4)

841
(4)
New/Used Auto Sales
1,000 sfgla
86.56
ITE 9th equation
1.87
2.37
TL Regression
56%
FL Curve
28.73
1.30
37.35
$17,153
$404
$7,443
$9,710
$1,565
520%
1,000 sfgla
53.28
ITE 9th equation
2.40
2.90
TL Regression
67%
FL Curve
27.16
1.30
35.31
$16,212
$364
$6,706
$9,506
$3,181
199%
1,000 sfgla
41.80
ITE 9th equation
2.64
3.14
TL Regression
73%
FL Curve
25.54
1.30
33.20
$15,244
$337
$6,209
$9,035
$5,504
64%
1,000 sfgla
36.27
ITE 9th equation
2.87
3.37
TL Regression
76%
FL Curve
25.08
1.30
32.60
$14,970
$326
$6,006
$8,964
$5,504
63%
28.25
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
4.60
5.10
FL Studies
79%
FL Studies
32.54
1.30
42.30
$19,426
$400
$7,370
$12,056
$4,482
169%
1.51
2.01
FL Studies
28%
FL Studies
103.89
1.30
135.06
$62,015
$1,533
$28,245
$33,770
$7,581
346%
2.40
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
21.31
1.30
27.70
$12,719
$285
$5,251
$7,468
$2,498
199%
2.90
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
67%
Same as LUC 820

(50k-200k sq ft)
15.67
1.30
20.37
$9,354
$210
$3,869
$5,485
$2,095
162%
56%
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
14.95
1.30
19.44
$8,925
$210
$3,869
$5,056
$2,692
88%
1,000 sf
853
1,000 sf
775.14
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
857
Discount Club
1,000 sf
41.80
ITE 9th Edition
862
863

880/
881
890
Furniture Store
912
1,000 sf
30.74
ITE 9th Edition
2.40
45.04
ITE 9th Edition
1.87
2.37
Same as LUC 820

(50k sq ft or less)
1,000 sf
95.96
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.08
2.58
FL Studies
32%
FL Studies
20.25
1.30
26.33
$12,086
$278
$5,122
$6,964
$5,269
32%
1,000 sf
5.06
ITE 9th Edition
6.09
6.59
FL Studies
54%
FL Studies
5.27
1.30
6.85
$3,149
$63
$1,161
$1,988
$605
229%
159.34
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.46
2.96
FL Studies
46%
FL Studies
57.16
1.30
74.31
$34,119
$762
$14,039
$20,080
$15,850
27%
3.14
3.64
FL Studies
77%
FL Studies
69.82
1.30
90.77
$41,680
$897
$16,527
$25,153
$10,752
134%
1,000 sf
1,000 sf
931
Quality Restaurant
1,000 sf
91.10
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
932
1,000 sf
116.60
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.17
3.67
FL Studies
71%
FL Studies
83.19
1.30
108.15
$49,659
$1,067
$19,659
$30,000
$7,790
285%
511.00
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.05
2.55
FL Studies
58%
FL Studies
192.60
1.30
250.38
$114,971
$2,655
$48,917
$66,054
$9,389
604%
31.43
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.62
4.12
FL Studies
72%
FL Studies
25.97
1.30
33.76
$15,501
$328
$6,043
$9,458
n/a
n/a
157.33
ITE 9th Edition

(944 & 946 Blend)
1.90
2.40
FL Studies
23%
FL Studies
21.79
1.30
28.33
$13,010
$305
$5,619
$7,391
$1,511
389%
service bay
43.94
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
2.18
2.68
FL Studies
68%
FL Studies
20.65
1.30
26.85
$12,326
$281
$5,177
$7,149
$6,455
11%
934
942
944/
946

1,000 sf
1,000 sf
fuel pos.
947

INDUSTRIAL:
110
1,000 sf
6.97
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
10.47
1.30
13.61
$7,291
$127
$2,340
$4,951
$1,208
310%
120
1,000 sf
1.50
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
2.25
1.30
2.93
$1,569
$27
$497
$1,072
$1,162
-8%
140
Manufacturing
1,000 sf
3.82
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.74
1.30
7.46
$3,996
$70
$1,290
$2,706
$1,162
133%
150
Warehousing
1,000 sf
3.56
ITE 9th Edition
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
92%
Same as LUC 710
5.35
1.30
6.96
$3,724
$65
$1,198
$2,526
$860
194%
2.15
Blend ITE 9th & FL

Studies
3.60
FL Studies
(Pinellas County)
92%
Same as LUC 710
1.94
1.30
2.52
$1,354
$25
$461
$893
$433
106%
151
Mini-Warehouse
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
1,000 sf
3.10
D-16
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
DRAFT
ITE LUC
Land Use
Unit
Trip Rate
Trip Rate Source
Assessable Trip
Length
Total Trip
Length
Trip Length Source
5.15
5.65
Same as LUC 710
Percent
New Trips
% New Trips Source
92%
Same as LUC 710
(1)
Net VMT
PersonTrip
Factor
Net PMT
1.30
3.28
Total
Mobility Cost
Annual
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Credit
Net
Mobility Fee
$1,757
$31
$571
$1,186
Current
Impact Fee
(2)
Zone 7
%
Change
INDUSTRIAL:
152
1)
2)
3)
4)
High-Cube Warehouse
1,000 sf
1.68
ITE 9th Edition
2.52
n/a
n/a
Tindale Oliver
March 2016
D-17
Hillsborough County
Mobility Fee Study
IMPACT FEE OFFSET ACCOUNTS

(2/11/2016)
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
OFFSET (CREDIT) ACCOUNT

KINGSWAY PLAZA ASSOCIATES ZONE 4
GARRISON DEVELOPER GROUP - ZONE 8
PROGRESS BOULEVARD II, LTD- TRANS ZONE 8
AMPROP ASSOC-ZONE 1
MERITAGE HOMES OF FLORIDA, INC - ZONE 7,8,9
BLOOMINGDALE PT CC-SUAREZ HOUSING
THE RYLAND GROUP, INC -ZONE 6
CHRISTINA WOODS APARTMENTS, LTD
THE OASIS AT BRANDON LLC - ZONE 7
IRIS CROSSTOWN APARTMENTS, LLC - ZONE 7
GCT CRESCENT CROSSTOWN FL VENTURE, LLC - ZONE 7
STERLING RANCH-FLORIDA LAND CORP.
LITHIA OAKWOOD ZONE 7
IH BRANDON HOMES ZONE 8
THE RYLAND GROUP - ZONE 8
C.E. SPRINGER-ROW
CLADCO DEVELOPMENT CO
SR DEVELOPMENT-ZONE 7
CARROLLWOOD COMMONS
BRENTWOOD HILLS - ZONE 7
BELLEAIR DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC - ZONE 7
WAWA - ZONE 10
SELS REAL ESTATE, LLC
LIVE OAK COMMERCIAL LLC
THOMASON-ZONE 2
PROVIDENCE LAKES SUAREZ HSG
PRESIDENTS PLAZA
MILLENNIUM CENTER-ZONE 7
CRISTINA PROJECT
FRG - ZONE 8
RYLAND GROUP-ZONE 1
American Heritage USA Zone 7
CLASSIC TOWNHOMES - ZONE 1
MI HOMES OF TAMPA - ZONE 7, 8, 9
CAY RACETRACK, LLC& GAN RACETRACK, LLC
KEYSTONE CROSSINGS-RESIDENTIAL
MICHAEL AUGUSTINE
BLOOMINGDALE HILLS SEC. A, UNIT 2
SHURGARD-BRANDON JOINT VEN. #7 ZONE
RIVERHLLS CHURCH OF GOD
VAN DYKE FARMS SHANNON PROP
WINDHORST VILLAGE
BUCKHORN-FAIRWAY RIDGE
FLORIDA RESOURCE GROUP, LLC
Page 1
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
BALANCE
0.02
0.06
0.08
0.39
0.72
0.76
0.78
1.08
2.60
3.42
3.44
9.71
20.00
25.21
34.60
55.49
68.32
71.61
75.85
76.85
87.55
99.00
146.82
159.78
166.24
197.89
204.10
209.35
276.80
296.47
376.19
378.24
387.94
395.04
398.31
425.44
457.86
458.20
473.93
490.86
518.03
555.88
577.41
606.16
ZONE
4
8
8
1
789
7
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
4
4
7
10
7
7
10
1
2
2
7
10
7
7
8
1
7
1
789
1
1
7
7
7
4
1
4
7
789

(2/11/2016)
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
ROCKY POND Z 1 T & R/W

CIRCLE K STORES INC - ZONE 7
MACDILL CREDIT UNION-ZONE 7
JOINT VENTURE ZONE 1
MILLENIUM CENTER CONST.ZONE 7
DR HORTON INC - ZONE 8
KINGSWAY OAKS
TC VENTURE I, LLC - TRANS ZONE 7,8,9
RANCH ROAD GROVES PARTNERSHIP
VICTORY CENTER OF RIVERVIEW LLC
CENTEX HOMES
THE GRAHAM GROUP
SHOPPES AT LITHIA-ZONE 7
HAMILTON ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES-ZONE 7
HERITAGE STATION ZONE 1 TRANSPORTATION
LEN-HAWKS - TRANS ZONE 9
THE RYLAND GROUP, INC WATERSTONE- ZONE 8
COUNTRYWAY-ZONE 10-COMMERCIAL
ZONES 1 & 1A - CITRUS PARK MALL
SPRINGS AT BLOOMINGDALE-ZONE 7
MORRISON HOMES - ZONE 8
BLOOMINGDALE PLAT AA/GG MACRIELY HOM
DUKE REALTY - ZONE 10 TRANSPORTATION
MITCH BURLEY CONSTRUCTION
RYLAND GROUP ZONE 7
TAYLOR WOODROW-ZONE 1
PANTHER TRACE ZONE 7 RIGHT-OF-WAY
STANDARD PACIFIC OF TAMPA - TRANSPORTATION
GRANT HOMES INC.
GLENHAVEN PLAZA
LENNAR PAVILION-ZONE 8
CENTREPLEX DEVELOPMENT CORP ZONE 1
CANTERBURY LAKES - STAR 101 DEVELOP
APPLE,G.J. - BENT TREE Z 7
KHAN BOYETTE ZONE 7
KEVINE. HOWELL, JR. CBC, LLC
FAIRWAY RIDGE - DEVCO DEV
LIFELINK FOUNDATION, INC - TRANS Z7
EASTWOOD COMMERCE CENTER
THE RYLAND GROUP, INC - ZONE 2
CROSSTOWN STOR-N-MOR
FISHHAWK - BOYETTE RD. ZONE 7
ST. MATTHEWS ANGLICAN CHURCH
PLANTATION - PLUTE TP ZONE 1
Page 2
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
644.23
645.67
700.00
744.16
807.14
812.39
849.00
940.90
941.30
1,059.70
1,155.12
1,201.22
1,264.63
1,323.84
1,380.61
1,431.61
1,492.96
1,524.40
1,575.45
1,642.40
1,654.12
1,674.94
1,717.64
1,720.43
1,737.13
1,769.08
1,789.55
1,792.10
1,792.20
1,793.14
1,841.97
1,918.72
2,003.11
2,059.97
2,077.97
2,138.09
2,450.58
2,616.40
2,620.31
2,840.79
2,970.90
3,162.01
3,232.53
3,500.00
3,651.59
1
7
7
1
7
8
7
789
7
789
8
1
7
7
7
1
9
8
10
1
7
8
7
10
7
7
1
7
7
4
7
8
1
8
7
7
1
7
7
4
2
8
7
7
1

(2/11/2016)
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
SUN CITY CENTER - ROW

LAKEWOOD BRANDON APTS ZONE 7
NVR, INC. - Z8
PARKLAND EAST-ROW
DUKE-WEEKS CORP-ZONE 4
TWIN OAKS TOWNHOUSES
WOODLAND VILLAGE APARTMENTS
MISTY GLEN TRANSPORTATION ZONE 4
SOUTHTRUST - ZONE 1
ZP NO. 59 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
SEMBLER-RETAIL-ZONE1
CIRCLE K STORES INC - ZONE 1
J.J.L. DEVELOPMENT, INC.
MENDEZ, CHARLES
PLANTATION - PLUTE R/W ZONE 1
THE SEMBLER COMPANY
VALRICO VILLAGE/RODRIGUEZ-HOFF
AMPROP ASSOCIATES III-ZONE 1
KINGS LAKE LLC
BROOKWOOD CM PROPERTIES OF FLORIDA
WESTBROOK PEBBLE CREEK LP T&R
EAGLE WATCH/SHIMBERG CROSS
REGENT TAMPA ZONE 1
BLOOMINGDALE/BELL SHOALS SHOPPING
GK HIGHLAND PARL, LLC
USODP CROSSTOWN, LLC - ZONE 7
DIAMOND HILLS-ZONE4
LAKE MAGDALENE WOODS
RIVER VUSTA SUBDIVISION T&R
KRAFT INC
SUN CITY CENTER SENIOR CARE LIVING III, LLC - Z7
Nohl Crest Homes-Zone 1
DUKE REALTY
CARDEL MASTER BUILDERS - TRANS ZONE 6
BRANDON PARKWAY, LLC FOR TRANSP FEES ZONE 7
SUAREZ HOUSING CORPORTAION
CAY LYNMAR, LLC - ZONE 1
SASIKALA, LLC - ZONE 7
BEAZER HOMES CORP - ZONE 9
THE RYLAND GROUP, INC (2) - ZONE 7, 8, 9
THE AVENUE AT WESTCHASE, LLC
BURKE PROPERTY 78TH ST
ALPHA HOMES- ZONE 7
GIUNTA GROUP ZONE 1
M/I HOMES OF TAMPA, LLC
Page 3
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,756.06
3,757.12
3,847.64
3,911.64
3,931.18
4,081.60
4,220.48
4,509.18
4,567.83
4,649.46
4,739.92
4,812.42
4,877.32
5,000.00
5,095.04
5,301.00
5,355.00
5,370.03
5,752.46
6,334.03
6,407.48
6,432.68
6,498.37
6,883.89
7,005.43
7,156.33
7,218.18
7,244.00
8,196.08
8,266.31
8,675.00
8,716.97
9,121.37
9,455.26
9,530.35
9,618.90
9,837.76
9,925.43
10,454.68
10,752.60
10,916.38
11,024.01
11,083.00
11,270.34
11,879.68
9
7
8
7
4
1
1
4
1
10
1
1
7
1
1
1
7
1
789
7
2
8
1
7
1
7
4
10
8
4
7
1
4
6
7
7
1
7
9
789
1
8
7
1
4

(2/11/2016)
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
PARSONS OAKS
DUKE - FAIRFIELD
WATERFORD CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT
FRANKLIN-ZONE 4
BRANDON CROSSINGS-ZONE 7
THE RYLAND GROUP, INC - ZONE 7
COLWELL AVENUE PROPERTIES V - TRANS ZONE 1
FALKENBURG PARTNERS ZONE 7
CARRIAGE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC - Z8
LAKE BRANDON CTR - ZONE 7
STORAGEWORLD PROPERTIES ZONE 7
BAYVILLA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC
LUTZ PROF. CTR. T & ROW Z1
SHELDON ROAD PROFESSIONAL CENTER - ZONE 10
NAUI WORLDWIDE HEADQUARTERS
RIVER SPRINGS LLC - ZONE 6
NCJ INVESTMENTS
NORTH LAKEWOOD ZONE 4 T & R
PROVIDENCE LAKES - CENTEX T&R
METRO DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC - ZONE 7
TOWN CENTER DRIVE LLC - Z7
PRATTS & PRATTS LLC - ZONE 10
CORNER PROPERTIES TAMPA BAY LLC - ZONE 6
CONNERSTONE PROP/PWH EQUIP Z-8
DF&R OPERATING COMPANY
CALUSA TRACE - TRANS & ROW
HIGH REACH COMPANY
CROSS CREEK/WALKER DE. T & ROW
SMITH LAND - ZONE 8
HOMES BY WEST BAY - TRANS ZONE 7 8 9
BLOOMINGDALE OAKS
ZONE 7
BW DALE MABRY FLOYD, LLC - Z 1
CIMINELLI DEV. CO. T&R
TMT RETIREMENT FUND, LLC - Z 7,8,9
301 CONEGROVE, LLC
M/I HOMES OF TAMPA, LLC
LENNAR HOMES- ZONE 2
MERITAGE HOMES OF FLORIDA - ZONE 7
CYPRESS TRACE ASSOC. ZONE 7
CITRUS PARK SELF-STORAGE
PP MAINSAIL LP - TRANSPORTATION
METRO DEVELOPMENT GROUP - ZONE 7, 8, 9
RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC.
TWC EIGHTY-FOUR,LTD ZONE 8
DR HORTON - ZONE 4
Page 4
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12,102.80
12,506.31
12,507.16
13,763.67
14,173.18
14,336.80
14,622.76
14,633.29
14,762.20
14,885.45
15,000.00
15,876.20
16,000.00
16,000.00
16,646.75
16,928.53
17,210.96
17,500.00
18,020.89
18,053.50
18,439.18
18,524.09
18,844.00
19,362.45
20,548.39
20,847.21
21,600.00
21,934.63
22,380.39
23,297.30
23,600.00
23,764.05
24,745.45
25,089.40
26,718.85
27,385.50
27,390.26
27,810.80
29,078.16
29,301.11
30,416.05
31,352.16
31,536.48
33,995.43
34,000.00
7
4
1
4
7
7
1
7
8
7
7
1
1
10
8
6
10
4
7
7
7
10
6
8
10
1
4
2
8
789
7
1
1
789
789
1
2
7
7
1
10
789
1
8
4

(2/11/2016)
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC - Z 4

HUPP & BRACIAK-ZONE 7
BLOOMINGDALE COMMERCIAL CENTER
SCHWENK PROPERTIES - AKA RHO GROUP, LLC - ZONE 7
LAKE KATHY , LTD. TRANSP & RW ,ZONE 4
BRANDON MINI-J.R.S, EQUI Z-7
CORPOREX DRI
ZONE 4
CK HOLDINGS OF TAMPA, LLC - ZONE 7
MI HOMES OF TAMPA LLC - ZONE 7
MAINSAIL SUNFOREST ZONE 10
COBALT-CLW NEW TAMPA, LLC
TWC TWO LLC
MARKET AT FISH HAWK RANCH
CARTER-SUNFOREST ZONE 10
SILVERMILL PHASE I
301 TAMPA LLC - ZONE 8
CARDANELL FARMS ZONE 7
GARCIA PROVIDENCE ZONE 7
WILLIAM RYAN HOMES - ZONE 7
ARVIDA/JMB PARTNERS/T & R
6771 MADISON, LLC - ZONE 8
CAPITAL ONE SERVICES ZONE 10
OLDE TIMES SQUARE TRANS *& ROW
THORNTONS INC - ZONE 10
COVINGTON PROFESSION PARK
RHODINE ROAD INVESTMENTS, LLC - ZONE7
MR. DONALD STUUBE
GIBSONTON AND 301, LLC
CARDEL MASTER BUILDERS - TRANS ZONE 9
SUNRISE HOMES INC.
DAVID WEEKLEY HOMES
FIFTH THIRD BANK - ZONE 10
GARRISON CHANNEL TRUST
KINGS MILL COMMERIAL - ZONE 4 & 7
BELL SQUARE ASSOCIATES ZONE 7 T & R
THE RYLAND GROUP, INC - ZONE 7, 8, 9
BLOOMINGDALE LITHIA LLC - ZONE 7
RSP IV CRITERION LTD
TAMPA INTERSTATE PART. - ZONE 7
PRIMROSE SCHOOL - TRANS ZONE 7
RETIREMENT FUND PROPERTIES - ZONE 4
KEN VONTZ
VAUGHN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP -Z4
ALBERTSON'S INC.
BLOOMINGDALE PARTNERS, LLC
Page 5
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
34,000.00
35,835.91
36,000.00
36,226.00
36,614.47
37,465.67
37,839.04
37,920.71
38,041.36
40,000.00
41,385.97
41,453.48
43,857.74
44,000.00
46,200.00
46,697.10
48,000.00
51,632.69
54,804.27
55,392.20
55,511.00
55,710.37
56,167.87
56,476.80
57,996.89
58,500.00
60,000.00
61,099.94
61,211.36
62,266.00
64,247.50
65,972.49
65,974.58
66,210.71
67,839.65
69,753.96
69,779.21
70,373.04
70,769.10
71,957.05
72,128.01
73,626.62
74,431.00
77,925.80
80,933.93
4
7
7
7
4
7
4
7
7
10
2
4
6
10
10
8
7
7
7
7
8
10
7
10
10
7
8
8
9
4
7
10
1
47
7
789
7
4
7
7
4
4
4
1
7

(2/11/2016)
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
WAWA - ZONE 4
ALLIANT FOODSERVICE-ZONE4
VOCA REALTY-ZONE 7
LANG ENVIRONMENTAL
CAM - B - ZONE 10
RIVERVIEW LAND COMPANY LLC - ZONE 7, 8, 9
COCA COLA/SABAL PARK
REDUS TRG - TRANS ZONE 7
CROSSTOWN OWNER LLC - ZONE 7
LGI- ZONE 7,8,9
REDCAST BLOOMINGDALE, LLC -TRANS ZONE 7
TAYLOR MORRISON HOMES
BRANDON BAY PROPERTIES T-R/W Z-7
ALBERTSON'S SHOPPING CENTER-LITHMILL
WATERFORD CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT
RIVERVIEW LAKES INVESTMENTS, LLC - TRANS 7,8, 9
ST. JOHN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
LENNAR HOMES - TRANSPORTATION ZONE 7
MCDONALD'S USA, LLC
WATERFORD DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION
PULTE-ZONE 7
RYLAND GROUP INC - ENCLAVE AT RAMBLE CREEK - ZONE 7
TOPGOLF USA BRANDON, LLC - ZONE 7
TAMPA CROSSROADS
KB HOME - ZONE 7
MINTO COMMUNITIES, LLC
PUBLIX WINTHROP ZONE 7
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES-ZONE 8
ASHTON TAMPA RESIDENTIAL, LLC - ZONE 10
NNP II - ZONE 1
NNPIV LAKE HUTTO - TRANS ZONE 8
KRG/PRP OLDSMAR, LLC- ZONE 10
ARLINGTON PROPERTIES, INC - ZONE 1
METRO DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC - Z7
KB HOME TAMPA, LLC - ZONE 7,8,9
CAMDEN WESTCHASE - ZONE 1
PULTE HOMES - THE HIGHLANDS/STARLING OAKS - Z7
JEN FLORIDA IX LLC - ZONE 7
SABAL HIGHWOODS/FORSYTH LIMITED T&R
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INS. CO. T&ROW
ATLANTIC HOMESTEAD VILLAGE INC.
PARSONS RUN PHASE II
BGB BRANDON LLC - ZONE 7
HEALTHTRUST OPTIONS, LLC - ZONE7
SOHO CAPTIAL LLC - TRANS ZONE 7, 8, 9
Page 6
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
81,056.55
84,310.69
93,930.00
94,366.63
94,783.66
95,989.42
97,315.00
100,000.00
107,725.11
108,999.78
112,430.06
113,150.10
113,801.10
115,309.89
127,325.35
128,843.12
129,547.84
130,823.30
141,058.56
148,520.68
152,720.93
155,937.27
158,015.88
158,266.22
161,593.54
164,645.36
165,688.18
169,014.28
177,460.11
182,445.17
182,811.45
184,066.27
186,342.00
194,341.82
200,000.00
204,753.72
215,052.00
215,171.30
220,272.15
223,128.33
223,169.16
225,853.86
240,858.76
245,915.21
258,589.71
4
4
7
7
10
789
4
7
7
789
7
7
7
7
1
789
8
7
9
1
7
7
7
4
7
789
7
8
10
1
8
10
1
7
789
1
7
7
4
7
10
7
7
7
789

(2/11/2016)
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
BIG BEND MEDICAL PARK, LLC

LENNAR-CENTRAL FLORIDA DIVISION
NEW LITHIA CROSSINGS LLC ZONE7
IDI GAZELEY - Z8
A WILLING SELLER LLC - ZONE 7
THE TRUST AT GORNTO LAKE T&R
DEAN J. PATTERSON
LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST-ZONE 10
FIRSTPARK @ BRANDON ZONE 7
US REAL ESTATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - ZONE 7
CG LAND INVESTMENTS, LLC - ZONE 8
HARDY H. HUNTLEY - ZONE 1 TRANS
VILLIAGES OF BLOOMINGDALE - TRANS ZONE 7
ALTA MAGNOLIA, LP- Z8
BRANDON PAVILION 2, LTD (ADLER) - TRANS ZONE 8
KB HOME OF TAMPA, LLC
MATTAMY TAMPA, LLC - ZONE 789
SUN PLAZA I, LTD - ZONE 7,8,9
FLORIDA CROSSROADS,INC.TRAN.&ROW
DIADEM, LLC
WAL-MART
TAYLOR MORRISON OF FLORIDA INC
HEATHER LAKES U.S.HOMES Z 7 T & R
BEAZER HOMES CORP - ZONE 7
FHSC REAL PROPERTY HOLDING COMPANY, LLC - Z7
SOHO COWLEY ROAD, LLC - ZONE 7,8,9
CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC. - TRANS - ZONE 4
SOUTHFORK EAST PROPERTIES, LLC - ZONE 7
CITRUS PARK VENTURE
KAZBOUR PROPERTIES INC - ZONE 7, 8, 9
FLORIDA CAPITAL REAL ESTATE PARTNERS 27, LTD
HBWB DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC - ZONE 7
LAXER FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP - Z 10
BRANDON SHOPPING CENTER PARTNERS, LTD - ZONE 7
FLORIDA CROSSROADS, LTD - ZONE 7
SLHC, INC - ZONE 7,8,9
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.
NEWLAND NATIONAL PARTNERS II, LLC - ZONE 7
GL HOMES VALENCIA LAKES-ZONE 7, 8, 9
CRESCENT RESOURCES - ZONE 8
JOHN FALKNER US301 POND 13 - TRANS ZONE 9
DIOCESE OF ST. PETERSBURG, ZONE 9 - DEBARTOLO
WINTHROP - ZONE 7
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP- ZONE 1
OK RHODINE ROAD LLC - ZONE 7,8,9
Page 7
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
260,624.02
265,036.62
276,847.24
277,100.00
279,392.96
280,658.00
300,000.00
305,662.95
308,256.30
321,697.42
341,960.34
360,000.00
382,742.56
389,168.84
395,521.89
403,822.42
405,014.60
409,663.13
425,000.00
442,836.81
465,354.94
468,474.49
469,709.56
480,232.90
559,241.85
616,311.10
623,870.00
624,282.79
636,749.69
668,044.29
703,855.19
723,143.71
727,776.66
856,172.52
873,385.00
885,085.11
892,774.31
946,302.00
1,117,086.18
1,148,923.31
1,165,000.00
1,193,953.86
1,206,969.75
1,251,257.21
1,374,984.98
8
789
7
8
7
7
10
10
7
7
8
1
7
8
8
789
789
789
7
8
9
6
7
7
7
789
4
7
1
8
8
7
10
7
7
789
8
7
789
8
9
9
7
1
789

(2/11/2016)
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
LNR REFSG HOLDINGS, LLC - ZONE 8

LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
MAXCY DEVELOPMENT GROUP
I-75/PALM RIVER ROAD LLC - ZONE 7
HOME DEPOT BLOOMINGDALE ZONE 7
JOHN FAULKER - DG FARMS- WALMART
BEBO HOLDINGS LLC
NNP SOUTHBEND II, LLC
HIGHLAND CASSIDY, LLC & RUSSELL SHABLA, LLC Z- 7,8,9
BELMONT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT - ZONE 9
Boyette Fishhawk-Zone 6
PULTE HOMES MAGNOLIA PARK - TRANS ZONE 8
SOUTHSHORE CORPORATE PARK - TRANS Z9
LENNAR HOMES LLC SUNSHINE VILLAGE - ZONE 9
NNP IV LAKE HUTTO- ZONE 6
TOTAL
Page 8
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,659,647.83
1,675,875.56
1,906,402.85
1,920,786.52
2,204,334.94
2,260,000.00
2,568,035.67
2,583,812.10
2,829,007.41
3,781,452.88
4,640,403.81
4,853,243.97
5,222,990.31
7,124,559.54
7,778,540.35
91,437,058.41
8
7
8
7
7
9
7
9
789
9
6
8
9
9
6
PROPORTIONATE SHARE AGREEMENTS
No.
Name
Thorntons_SR60-Lithia
Pinecrest Rd
1
2 Thorntons_Progress Blvd-US301
3 Thorntons_Gunn Hwy-Linebaugh Rd
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Westfield; Brandon Town Center expansion

Waters/Himes Shopping Ctr_Health Fitness
Ctr (Argate)
Waters Ave Charter School (MG3 Developer
Group, LLC)
Thorntons_Hillsborough Av-George Rd
WalMart Store
Tampa Charter HS (MG3 Valrico LLC)
Madison Park of Commerce (Eastgroup
Properties, LLC)
Trillium CNG Station (Madison LLC)
Camping World - Dover (emerald Coast RV
Centers, LLC)
Broadway Centre (Ashley Furniture)
South County Bullfrog Creek YMCA
Lakeshore Catholic Elem School (Diocese of
St Petersburg)
Bloomingdale Mixed Use (Red Cast)
Bullfrog Creek Townhomes
WaWa - Bloomingdale - Lithia Pinecrest
(Bloomingdale Lithia LLC)
Lithia Crossings Fresh Market (KRG Lithia,
LLC)
Madison Industrial Park - Bldgs B,C,D
(Industrial Developments Inc)
Bullfrog Creek Subdivision (Envirodev)
Symmes Rd Subdivision - North & South
Hartsfield Commons
Valrico Station - Phase II
Lodato Mixed Use (Beazer Homes)
Watson Rd Residential/Riverleaf (Meritage
Homes of Florida, Inc.)
Radiant Oil Company - Orient Rd
Carriage Pointe - Phase II
Westlake Townhomes (M/I Homes Thomas Property)
Shetland Ridge Subdivision
Built(B)/ Under
Construction
(UC)/ Not
Built(N)
Residential(R)/NonRes(N) /Mixed (M)
B
B
B
N
N
N
$34,000
$34,000
$79,102
$378,738
$509,052
B
B
B
B
N
N
N
N
$213,449
$70,596
$1,770,035
$82,051
N
B
N
N
$140,576
$34,000
N
B
B
N
N
N
$34,000
$34,000
$192,988
N
UC
N
N
M
R
$36,458
$34,000
B
N
N
R
$277,100
$56,316
N
N
B
B
R
R
R
M
$34,000
$34,000
B
B
UC
R
N
R
$34,000
$34,000
$287,498
B
B
R
R
$82,400
$34,000
Amount
pulled
$564,196
$48,421

Built(B)/ Under
Construction
(UC)/ Not
Built(N)
$34,000
$49,333
UC
$50,860
B
N
N
N
B
B
$123,948
$34,000
$34,000
$36,226
$34,000
B
N
N
R
$34,000
$34,000
$34,000
43
Culver's Restaurant (4200 Nebraska LLC)

Sheldon Road (Taylor Morrison)
Bloomingdale / John Moore Shopping
Center Parcel A (LSREF2 Gator LLC)
Bloomingdale / John Moore Shopping
Center Parcel B (LSREF2 Gator LLC)
$34,000
44
45
Gornto Lake Subdivision (Meritage Homes)

Circle K
UC
UC
R
N
$37,000
$34,000
46
Charleston Landings II (Urisha Holdings)

Tampa Hauling (Progressive Waste Systems
of FL/IESI CorP)
Race Trac 638
Geraci Single Family (Van Dyke Residential
or Standard Pacific Res)
Old Memorial Estates Phase 3 (Taylor
Morrison)
Circle K (Bloomindale @ Watson)
Towncenter Daycare
SCHC (Suncoast Community Health Centers,
Inc)
Carrollwood Crossings (Gauge Line
Development Group, LLC)
Marketplace at Citrus Park (M&M Tampa
Citrus Park LLC)
Hidden Oaks Estates (Lennar Homes)
UC
$38,950
B
B
$34,000
34,000
UC
34,000
B
UC
B
R
N
N
34,000
34,000
34,000
UC
34,000
34,000
UC
N
52,145
34,000
No.
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Name
Cabot US Hwy 301 Warehouse (Cabot IV
FL4M01, LLC)
Aprile-Estuary Final Phase
Riverview Meadows - Phase II (Tucker JV
LLC)
Mother Teresa School & John Paul II Youth
Center (Diocese of St Petersburg)
Talavera Subdivision
Dickman Parcel (Pulte/Centex)
Ballantrae (Schwenk Properties, LLC)
Broadway Centre Townhomes
Amount
No.
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
Name
Fern Hill Phase 1A & 1B (Eisenhower
Property Group)
Jefferson Estates
Starling Oaks (Pulte Homes)
Eola Capital LLC
Haven Student Housing
Dale Mabry Retail Center (BW Dale Mabry
Floyd LLC)
Vaughn Family (SR 60 & Lakewood Dr)
Escape Theater
Gibsonton Square Movie Theater
(Gibsonton Retail Holdings LLC)
14202 N 42nd St Housing (USF Home Run
Student Housing)(CA Student Living Tampa
Property Owner LLC)
Lodge at Idlewild (Abundant Life Family
Trust; Edward Atzenhoefer)
Keystone Prep High School
Highlands (D.R. Horton)
Wawa; Fletcher & Livingston (BW Fletcher
Livingston LLC)
Publix at Southshore Village (1941
Development LLC)
Zambito Property (Taylor Morrison)
Duke - Big Bend Distribution Center (Duke
Realty LP)
Tapestry at Lake Park Apts (Geraci Land
Acquisition, LLC)
Carriage Pointe - Phase II (Carriage Pointe
Partners, LLC)
Circle K - Gibsonton
Twin Creek Senior Living FKA River Springs
ALF (Lithia Assisted Living LLC)
Keene Subdivision (First Tampa
Development Corporation)
Northgate KB Homes
Valrico Station Phase III
SWC Big Bend at Lincoln (Thornton's)
Gibsonton Dr Mixed Use at Park Place (res
phase)
Built(B)/ Under
Construction
(UC)/ Not
Built(N)
Amount
UC
UC
UC
N
UC
52,684
34,000
34,000
34,000
B
UC
N
N
N
N
34,000
72,431
34,000
34,000
B
B
N
M
N
R
34,000
34,000
34,000
34,000
N
UC
34,000
34,000
102,000
34,000
UC
N
R
N
34,000
34,000
34,000
N
N
UC
UC
R
R
R
N
34,000
34,000
34,000
34,000
34,000
No.
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
Name
Burger King Hillsborough and Staley (Staley
Drive Assoc, LLC) (BravoTampa LLC)
ACE Hardware of Bloomingdale
(Summerfield Designs, LLC)
Freedom Ridge (KB Home)
Brandon Palms Apts (Blue Brandon Palms
LLS)
Geraci - (Pulte Home Corporation)
Wawa Northdale (Up Development - Dale
Mabry LLC)
Copeland Rd
Wawa Dale Mabry Waters
Medford Lakes
Circle K US 41/19th Ave (Circle K Stores
Inc.)
Race Trac #1025 US 301 & Riverview
North Dale Mabry Academy
Citrus Park Charter School (School Property
Development Tampa, LLC)
Progress Park Mini-Storage
Tampa Park of Commerce
Southgate
South Fork
Mirabella
County Line Rd Private School
The Rivas Clinic
Bloomingdale & Watson
Zaxby's Gibsonton
Built(B)/ Under
Construction
(UC)/ Not
Built(N)
34,000
N
N
N
R
34,000
34,000
N
UC
R
R
34,000
34,000
UC
N
N
N
N
R
N
R
34,000
N
N
N
N
N
N
34,000
34,000
44,625
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
R
R
R
N
N
N
N
34,000
34,000
34,000
34,000
34,000
34,000
34,000
34,000
34,000
34,000
TOTAL
Amount
34,000
34,000
$7,829,178
DEVELOPMENTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI'S)

PROJECT NAME
LAND USE/
MEASURE
TOTAL APPROVED
AMOUNT
SPECIFIC
APPROVED
AMOUNT
DURING RPT. YR.
CUMUL. DEVT43
Remaning Entitlements
Apollo Beach/ Phase 1
Total Acres Residential

(#) Commercial (GSF)
Office
(GSF) Marina
(Slips)
3,100
2,429
870,464
140,000
86
ALL
Not
Available
1,495
399,376
28,306
N/A
934 residential
471,088 commercial
111,694 sf office
86
slips
73
Summerfield Crossings
Total Acres Residential/SF

(#) Residential/TH (#)
Residential/MF (#)
Res./Retirement (#)
Retail/Regnl (GSF)
Retail/Comty (GSF)
Retail/Nghbd (GSF)
Office/Tech (GSF) Medical
(GSF)
1,886
3,70984
33584
0
105
760,000
278,800
182,000
568,800
55,83284
3,70984
33584
0
105
380,000
278,800
152,000
280,000
55,83284
49
0
0
0
36,426
108,527
0
0
0
3,092
335
0
105
332,584
131,313
50,442
4,600
0
617 residential 296,191

retail 275,400 sf office
55,832 medical
84
Westchase (fka
Thomas Ranch)
Total Acres Residential

(#) Retail
(GSF)
Office
(GSF) Day
Care
(GSF)
1,451
3,650
349,000
240,000
0
ALL
0
0
0
0
3,546
78,315
49,205
13,520
104 residential
270,685 sf retail
177,275 sf office
98
Sabal Center
Total Acres Office/R&D

(GSF) Retail
(GSF)
Hotel
(Rooms)
195
3,267,000
150,000
1,000
1,737,000
150,000
265
0
0
0
1,288,850
0
265
448,150 sf office
150,000 sf retail
Sunforest
Total Acres
Office (GSF)
Retail
(GSF)
Hotel (Rooms)
Hotel (Suites) Voc./Trade
(GSF) Restaurant (GSF)
Apartments
(#)
58
804,721
20,000
100
053
130,00053
8,000
67853
361,454
20,000
0
053
130,00053
8,000
67853
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
182,506
0
0
360
130,000
0
318
178,948 sf office 20,000

sf retail 8,000 sf
retaurant
106
Corporex
Total Acres
Service Ctr. (GSF) Industrial
(GSF)
Office (GSF)
Retail
(GSF)
Hotel
(Rms.)
99
94,000
520,000
293,500
32,000
250
ALL
0
0
0
0
0
94,000
336,920
143,500
0
98
183,080 sf industrial
150,000 sf office
32,000 sf retail
152
room hotel
115
Woodland Corporate
Center
Total Acres
Office
(GSF)
Industrial
(GSF)
183
811,000
268,950
ALL
0
0
781,050
268,950
29,950 sf office
Regency Park North
Total Acres
Office (GSF)
Residential/MF (#) Retail
(GSF)
Hotel
(Rms.)
{R/D
(GSF)}13
120
623,005
565
50,000
392
0
ALL
0
0
0
0
0
410,666
360
0
392
0
212,339 office
205
residential 50,000 sf
retail
DRI
#
59
105
131
121
Tampa Triangle
Total Acres
Office
(GSF)
Svc.
Center (GSF) Retail (GSF)
Residential/MF (#)
145
Southbend
Total Acres Industrial

(GSF) Retail
(GSF)
Office
(GSF) Service
Ctr. (GSF) Residential/SF
(#) Residential/MF (#)
Residential/TH (#) Hotel
(Rooms)
148
The Pavilion
(fka Lumsden/301)
Total Acres Res./MF

(#) Res./SF
(#)
Retail
(GSF) Office
(GSF)
151
Crosstown Center
(fka Lake Fair Mall)
Total Acres
Office (GSF)
Retail
(GSF)
Hotel (Rooms)
Res./MF
(#)
258
1,499,302
345,000
200
1,097
Westfield Citrus Park Mall (fka

Northwest Regional Mall)
Total Acres
Reg. Mall (GSF) Retail
(GSF)
Office (GSF)
Theatre
(Seats)
231
1,480,000
417,100
112,70961
3,64261
Fishhawk Ranch

Retail
(GSF) Office
(GSF) Warehouse (GSF)
3,037
4,503
660
386,56986
92,000
48,31586
140
170
191
ALL
0
0
0
0
0
118,822
0
910
439,831 sf office
24,750 sf retail
20
residential
160,000
1,116,600
601,300
213,120
1,020
172
0
250
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,154
0
0
0
160,000 industrial
1,116,600 sf retail
601,300 sf office
213,120 svc ctr
38
residential
250 room
hotel
ALL
0
0
4,786
0
604
512
73,600
0

sf retail 60,000 sf
office
94
258,490
50,000
20094
1,09794
0
0
344
542,490
0
0
1,097
806,812 sf office
50,000 sf retail
200
room hotel
ALL
0
0
0
0
974,527
406,001
8,400
3,642
516,572 sf retail
104,309 sf office
4,499
160
386,56986
50,000
48,31586
36
0
0
0
0
3,202
487
249,102
45,878
48,315

sf retail 4,122 sf office
55
50,000
24,750
93055
612
1,600,000
1,116,600
654,000
640,000
1,020
472
322
500
245
112
512
150,000
60,000112
1,385
1,45054
0
176
0
0
0
0
0
0
864
0
0
0
224,262
0

sf retail 10,000 sf office
ALL
0
0
0
0
581,899
75,125
2,940
0
468,101 sf office
274,875 sf industrial
107,060 sf retail 220
room hotel
49
0
0
0
0
1,159
273
93,544
6,900
407

sf commercial
33,100
sf office
268 boat
slips
0
0
2,794
9
137
0
0
1,256,206
0
2,794
98
379
0
500
1,388,014 sf indus
50,000 sf office 100,000
sf retail
951
residential
150 room
hotel
181
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
677
48
0
15,200
113,000
0
2
0
0
0
0

commercial 165,866
office 36,000 sf med
office
1,45054
194
DG Farms
(fka Casperson)
Total Acres Res./Retire.

(#) Res./SFD
(#)
Res./SFA
(#) Res./MF
(#) Res./SFA-MF (#)
Retail
(GSF) Office
(GSF)
208
The Crescent
(fka Towermarc/301)
Total Acres
Office (GSF)
Industrial
(GSF)
Retail
(GSF)
Hotel
(Rooms)
145
1,050,000
350,000
110,000
220
Harbor Bay

Commercial (GSF) Office
(GSF) Boat Slips/Wet (#)
1,096
1,550
700
300,000
40,000
675
ALL
South Shore
Corporate Park
Total Acres
Industrial
(GSF) Office
(GSF)
Retail
(GSF)
Residential/MF (#)
Residential/SF (#) Hotel
(Rooms) College
(Students)
1,018
5,563,525
413,800
199,000
2,644,220
50,000
100,000
241
249
259
266
Lake Hutto
Total Acres Res./SFD

(#) Res./SFA
(#)
Res./MF
(#)
Commercial (GSF) OfficeGenrl (GSF) OfficeMedcl(GSF) Schools
(#) Day Care
(GSF)
Fitness
(GSF) Private
Sch.(Studnt) ACLF
(Beds)
Waterset (fka Wolf

Creek Branch S/D)
Overall Acres Res./SFD

(#) Res./SFA
(#)
Res./Sr. SFD
(#) Res./Sr.
SFA
(#) Res./MF
(#) Commercial (GSF)
Office
(GSF)
54
54
1,000
5454
435,047
10,000
101
602101
150
1,000
1,139
1,563
742126
260126
210,000
279,000
36,000
2
0
0
0
0
2,350
3,619
959
400
100
1,350
498,480
198,900
54
0
0
5454
235,047
10,000
101
602101
150
500
ALL
ALL
32
0
0
0
0
110
187
0
0
0
0
110
14,639
0
6,428 residential
483,841 sf commercial
198,900 sf office
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LIST

list of those approved, but not completed
No. DA Number
Name
Prop Share?
Contribution
Remaining Entitlements
superceded by 10-0254
500 Hotel Rooms
90,000 sf Office
23,000 sf Commercial
1
2
3
4
08-0308
08-0703
08-1325
09-1117
Fountains at Falkenburg
Triple Creek
Fountains at Falkenburg Amendment
Aprile Property
10-0254
Fountains at Falkenburg
10-0890
Apollo Beach Holdings
10-0930
Triple Creek
8
9
11-0220
11-0251
US 41 Big Bend Rd (Duke Realty)

I-75 Palm River Rd
10
12-0149
Lake Hutto
11
13-0409
Dune FL Land I Sub - West Lake
SR 674: 4L from existing terminus to project

access
940 residential units
SR 674 at W Lake Dr: add EBR
cst Lumsden from site to Lithia Pinecrest;
joint agreement w County to do Lumsden
impvts
extend Palm River Rd as a 2LU to
Falkenburg Rd
Camden Field Pwy at Falkenburg: cst 2EBL,

NBL, signalize
US 41 at Big Bend: xtd SBR as SBT, cst NBR,

cst 3rd NBT, recst NBR
10,000 sf club facilities
148 boat slips
Balm Riverview: SBL at Woodside; SBL at
Elnora, SBR at Panther Trace,
1662 dwelling units
Big Bend: xtd from circle to N access and to
Boyette
19,000 sf commercial
Summerfield Blvd: xtd as 2LU from exist to
Panther Trace
Big Bend at Balm Riverview: cst SBL,
signalize when warranted
NA
NA
12
14-0637
The Grove
13
14-0859
The Estuary - 2nd Amendment
46,000 commercial
154 multi-family DU's
superceded by DA 15-1012
superceded by DA 14-0859
$41,915,222 in improvements and

contributions

210,000 sf retail
279,000 sf office
36,000 sf medical office
32 acres elem/middle school/park
20 acres public park
signalize Falkenburg at Palm River

Rd/Delaney Lake Dr
300 single family residential

372,350 sf retail
360 multi family residential
6L Falkenburg from Xtown to Palm River Rd

(N)
125 hotel rooms
125,000 sf office
125,000 sf medical office
14
15-1012
Duke Big Bend
$102,000

Report On Hillsborough County Mobility Fees

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report On Hillsborough County Mobility Fees

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Board of County Commissioners

Lesley Les Miller, Chair, BOCC

Michael S. Merrill, County Administrator

Mobility Fee Program Update

Lucia E. Garsys, Chief Administrator

Job Creation and Redevelopment

Ron Barton, Assistant County

Bonnie Wise, Chief Financial

Board of County Commissioners

Lesley Les Miller, Chair, BOCC

Board of County Commissioners

Local roadway improvements

Columbus Dr. Ext

Bell Shoals Rd.

Gornto Lake Rd Ext.

Turkey Creek Rd.

Trip Generation Rate = Number per day

Mobility Fee will be spent on capacity projects that are

mobility fee schedule selected land uses

Full schedule provided, and available online

With New Sales Tax

mobility fee schedule residential land uses

Transferability of Existing Impact Fee Credits

Existing Impact Mobility

BEBR MediumLevel Projections

Trip Rate Source

Unit Cost per Lane Mile:

Trip Length Source

% New Trips Source

Interstate/Toll Facility Adjustment Factor:

Single Family (Detached) - Less than 1,500 sf &

Single Family (Detached) - Less than 1,500 sf &

Blend ITE 9th & FL

Blend ITE 9th & FL

Single Family (Detached) - Less than 1,500 sf

Multi-Family (Apartment); 1-2 Stories - Annual HH

Multi-Family (Apartment); 1-2 Stories

Blend ITE 9th & FL

Multi-Family (Apartment); 3+ Stories - Annual HH

ITE 9th Edition

ITE 9th Edition

ITE 9th Edition

Blend ITE 9th & FL

Multi-Family (Apartment); 3+ Stories - Annual HH

ITE 9th Edition

Blend ITE 9th & FL

Same as LUC 210

High-Rise Condominium; 3+ Stories

Mobile Home Park

Congregate Care Facility

Blend ITE 9th & FL

Hotel; All Suites

ITE 9th Edition

Same as LUC 310

Same as LUC 310

ITE 9th Edition

ITE 9th Edition

ITE 9th Edition

ITE 9th Edition

Same as LUC 240

Trip Rate Source

Trip Length Source

% New Trips Source