2/19/13

Adverse Events Following Immunisation (AEFI) | imac

Search website:

Home

About Immunisation
Immunisation

FAQs

News and Community

Vaccine Preventable Diseases

Resources

Health Professionals

Research

Vaccines and Vaccination

Vaccines
Adverse Events Following Immunisation (AEFI)

Safety

Definition and types of AEFI

Adverse
Efficacy and Events

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines an AEFI as a medical incident that takes place after an
immunisation, causes concern, and believed to be caused by immunisation.
ThereVaccines
are three
key aspects
Effectiveness
Following
Making
Safety
to this definition.

Immunisation
Monitoring

Travel itVaccination
Firstly, it is deliberately loose to encourage reporting of events. This is because
does not restrict the
type of event (other than being a health consequence) nor limit the time window after immunisation,
nor
(AEFI)
attempt to determine whether the immunisation may have been responsible, i.e. it is events, not
reactions that are reported.
Secondly, it describes a belief about causality that requires investigation. The belief that immunisation
was responsible may turn out to be correct, incorrect, or impossible to assess.
Thirdly, describing an event as an AEFI, does not and must not imply causality. (There is only a belief of
causality). Only after investigation, it may be possible to assign causality.
Within this framework an AEFI can be either:
Caused by the vaccine or immunisation process (causally associated) or
a coincidental event that, by chance, happened after immunisation (temporally associated).
There are three types of AEFIs caused by immunisation, these are caused by:
The inherent properties of the vaccine (vaccine reaction)
An error in the immunisation process (programme error)
Injection-related reactions arising from anxiety about or pain of the injection
Sometimes it is not possible to state with any degree of certainty what is the cause of a particular AEFI.
This is particularly true at the level of the individual if there are no studies that have helped assess
causality. From the above, there are five types of AEFI, described in table below.
Vaccine reaction

Event caused or precipitated by the vaccine when given correctly,

caused by the inherent properties of the vaccine.

Programme error

Event caused by an error in vaccine preparation, handling, or

administration.

Injection reaction

Event from anxiety about, or pain from, the injection itself rather
than the vaccine.

Coincidental

Event that happens after immunisation but not caused by the

vaccine - a chance association.

Unknown

The event's cause cannot be determined.

Source: Adapted from Immunisation Safety Surveillance: guidelines for managers of immunisation
programmes on reporting and investigating adverse events following immunisation. Manila: World
Health Organization, 1999.

Vaccine reactions
These reactions are caused by a constituent of the vaccine. In some cases this will be the vaccine
antigen (the substance that generates immunity), and is thus a side effect of the immunological process
of generating immunity. In other cases it will be caused by other vaccine constituents (e.g.
preservatives, stabilisers, antibiotics, or residual substance from the manufacturing process) or the
adjuvant that is added to boost the vaccines immunogenicity. Vaccine reactions can be categorised into
two types:
www.immune.org.nz/adverse-events-following-immunisation-aefi

1/5

2/19/13

Adverse Events Following Immunisation (AEFI) | imac

Common, usually minor and self-limiting

Rare and more serious
The reason that there are only these two types of vaccine reaction is that any vaccine that caused a
serious reaction that was even relatively common would either not be licensed for use or withdrawn
when the frequency of the serious adverse event is identified. An example of this was the withdrawal of
the first rotavirus vaccine because it was found to cause intussusception in about 1 in 10,000 vaccinees.
Similarly, oral polio vaccine (OPV) is no longer used in most industrialised countries because it carries a
risk of about 1 in 2 - 3 million of causing polio. However, the current use of OPV in developing countries
and its previous use in other countries, reflects the fact that the vaccine risks need to be balanced
against the risk of the disease and the cost of the alternative (inactivated vaccine in the case of OPV).

Common vaccine reactions (reactogenicity)

The common reactions are caused by the bodys response to the vaccine antigen(s) and the other
vaccine constituents. In general they occur within 24-48 hours of vaccination and are self-limiting.
However reactions following live vaccines (e.g. MMR) may be delayed and resemble a mild version of
the disease.
Symptom or sign

Maximum difference in rate*

Peak frequency
(days after
vaccination)

(%)

CI (95%)

Local erythema (>2 cm)

0.8

0.1-1.4

Other local reaction

0.4

0-1.4

Mild fever (<38.5C rectal)

2.7

0-6.1

10

Moderate fever (38.6-39.5C)

2.9

1.6-4.3

High fever (>39.5C)

1.4

0.7-2.1

10

Irritability

4.1

2.1-6.1

10

Drowsiness

2.5

1.4-3.6

11

Willingness to stay in bed

1.4

0.5-2.3

11

Generalised rash

1.6

0-3.0

11

Conjunctivitis

2.1

0.9-3.2

10

Arthropathy

0.8

0.2-1.3

7-9

Peripheral tremor

0.4

0-0.9

Cough and/or coryza

-1.5

-4.6-1.6

Nausea and/or vomiting

-0.8

-1.6-0

7-8

Diarrhoea

0.7

0-1.7

11

*between MMR group and placebo group

more in placebo-injected children.
Adapted from: Symptoms and signs caused by MMR vaccination and day of peak occurrence. Reference:
Peltola H, Heinonen OP. Frequency of true adverse reactions to measles-mumps-rubella vaccine. A
double-blind placebo-controlled trial in twins. Lancet 1986;1(8487):939-42
Common reactions are usually a local reaction at the site of injection and/or systemic symptoms. For the
local reaction there is pain, swelling, lump and/or redness at the injection site, which can vary in
severity and usually last a day or so but sometimes longer. The systemic symptoms can include fever
and a range of non-specific symptoms (e.g. irritability, malaise, off-colour, loss of appetite). For live
virus vaccines, the systemic symptoms can be a mild form of the disease (e.g. fever, rash for measles
vaccine).
The common reactions usually take place within a day or so of immunisation - except for live attenuated
vaccines such as measles/MMR, where reactions occur 6 to 12 days after immunisation (the time taken
for the vaccine virus to replicate). Common reactions usually only last a few hours to a few days. The
frequency and severity of these common reactions vary by vaccine and by person. (See specific vaccine
preventable diseases for details).

Rare vaccine reactions

While there is some similarity between the common reactions caused by all vaccines, the rare more
www.immune.org.nz/adverse-events-following-immunisation-aefi

2/5

2/19/13

Adverse Events Following Immunisation (AEFI) | imac

serious reactions tend to be more specific to each vaccine.

Most of the rare and more serious vaccine reactions (e.g. seizures, thrombocytopaenia, hypotonic
hyporesponsive episodes, persistent inconsolable screaming) do not lead to long-term problems.
Anaphylaxis, while potentially fatal, is treatable without leaving any long-term effects. Although
encephalopathy is included as a possible rare reaction to measles or DTP vaccine, it is not certain that
these vaccines in fact cause encephalopathy (brain inflammation) as there is no difference in incidence
between vaccinated and unvaccinated people.

Programme Errors
Programme errors result from errors and accidents in vaccine preparation, handling, or administration.
They are preventable with good practice, appropriate facilities and equipment. Vaccinator technique in
choosing the site for the injection, the depth of the injection, and the speed of injection may affect the
rate and extent of local reactions.
A programme error may lead to a cluster of events associated with a particular provider, health facility,
or even a single vial of vaccine that has been inappropriately prepared or contaminated. Programme
errors can also affect many vials (e.g. by freezing vaccine during transport, leading to an increase in
local reactions and loss of effect).
Globally, the most common programme errors are non-sterile injections leading to bacterial or viral
infections. This is extremely rare in New Zealand, particularly as multi-dose vials are not usually used.
Injection technique can also lead to increased local reactions for example giving intramuscular
injections too superficially.

Injection Reactions
Individuals can react in anticipation and as a result of the pain of any injection. This reaction is
unrelated to the content of the vaccine. Some individuals may be needle-phobic, aggravating such
reactions.
The injection reaction can lead to a group event. The event is essentially a psychological reaction that
spreads between individuals of the group (who are usually primed for this by high levels of anxiety),
when a member of the group suffers a reaction such as a faint or other vaccine reaction.
Fainting (vasovagal reactions) is a relatively common injection reaction, but usually only affects children
aged over five years. Fainting does not require any management beyond placing the patient in a
recumbent position, preferably the recovery position.
The likelihood of faints can be anticipated when immunising older children, and reduced by minimising
stress in those awaiting injection through short waiting times, comfortable room temperatures,
preparation of vaccine out of recipients view, and privacy during the procedure. Avoiding injury from the
fall is important, and those at particular risk should be immunised while lying down; the faint however
can occur many minutes after the immunisation.
Hyperventilation as a result of anxiety about the immunisation leads to specific symptoms of lightheadedness, dizziness, tingling around the mouth and in the hands, and sometimes chest pain.
IMAC 2010 Guidelines for a pre or post vaccination hyperventilation event - click here
Younger children tend to react in a different way, with vomiting a common anxiety symptom. Breathholding may occur, which can end in a brief period of unconsciousness during which breathing resumes.
They may also scream to prevent the injection or run away.
Clear explanations about the immunisation and calm, confident delivery will decrease the level of
anxiety about the injections and thus reduce the likelihood of an injection reaction.
It is important to be able to distinguish the loss of consciousness resulting from a fainting (vasovagal)
injection reaction to that of anaphylaxis.
Faint

Anaphylaxis

Usually at the time or

soon after the
injection

Usually some delay between

5-30 minutes after injection

Skin

Pale, sweaty, cold

and clammy

Red, raised and itchy

rash;swollen eyes, face;
generalised rash

Respiratory

Normal to deep

Noisy breathing from airways

Onset

System

www.immune.org.nz/adverse-events-following-immunisation-aefi

3/5

2/19/13

Adverse Events Following Immunisation (AEFI) | imac

breaths

obstruction (wheeze or stridor)

Bradycardia

Tachycardia

Transient
hypotension

Hypotension

Gastrointestinal

Nausea/vomiting

Abdominal cramps

Neurological

Transient LOC, good

response once prone

LOC, little response once

prone

Cardiovascular

Distinguishing anaphylaxis from a faint (vasovagal reaction)Source: Immunisation Safety Surveillance:

guidelines for managers of immunisation programmes on reporting and investigating adverse events
following immunisation. Manila: World Health Organization, 1999.

Coincidental events
This is probably the most important type of AEFI, in terms of impact on immunisation programmes. It is
the main cause for the continuing controversy about immunisation safety.
The distinction between the event happening after immunisation and being caused by immunisation is
not easy to make, and many people find it hard to understand. The automatic assumption is that when B
follows A, it is that A caused B.
Because large numbers of immunisations are given every day, it is inevitable that in the days following
immunisation many people will suffer major health events. Most vaccines are given early in life, when
infections and other illnesses are common, including manifestations of an underlying congenital or
neurological condition. The health event is likely to be blamed on the immunisation, simply because of
the temporal association between the events that, in fact, reflect chance and coincidence and not a real
causal relationship.
Examples of false allegations caused by coincidental events

One good example is the association between immunisation and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS or
cot death). The incidence of SIDS peaks around the age when infant immunisations are delivered. So,
many SIDS cases will occur in children who have been recently immunised. Inevitably, when a previously
healthy child dies a cause is sought. In some cases there will, purely by chance, have been an
immunisation, shortly before the death. The only way to clarify if such an event is in fact due to a
chance association is through careful studies. In the case of SIDS, controlled studies have shown that
the association of SIDS and immunisation is purely coincidental and not causal.
More recently, there has been much concern around MMR vaccine causing autism that started from a
report of 12 cases with a variable temporal association. Despite many controlled studies that have
failed to find a link, many parents remain convinced that their childs autism was due to the vaccine.
This association has arisen because MMR is usually given early in the second year of life at a time
when autism is recognised.
Anticipating coincidental events

It is possible to predict how often one would expect to see a coincidental association between a health
event and immunisation. Using the expected incidence (number of cases per population to be
vaccinated per time period) of the health event.
For example, assume that one million children aged 1-15 years are immunised in a mass campaign and
the background mortality rate for this population is 3 per 1000 per year. Then, 250 deaths can be
expected in the month after immunisation and 8 deaths on the day of the immunisation, simply by
coincidence. These deaths will be temporally associated with, even though entirely unrelated to,
immunisation.
A similar calculation is shown in the Table below for infant (aged under one-year) deaths in selected
Western Pacific countries for the number of deaths temporally associated with routine DTP
immunisation (calculated in 1999).

Coincidental deaths temporally linked to DTP immunisation

Infant
mortality
(per 1,000
live births)

Number
of births
per year

Number of infant deaths during one year in the:

month after
immunisation
www.immune.org.nz/adverse-events-following-immunisation-aefi

week after
immunisation

day after
immunisation
4/5

2/19/13

Adverse Events Following Immunisation (AEFI) | imac

Calculation

=IMR*1,000

=(IMR*N/12*
(nv*ppv/12)*12

=(IMR*N/52*
(nv*ppv/52)*52

=(IMR*N/365*
(nv*ppv/365)*365

Australia

5.7

257,874

331

76

11

Cambodia

89.6

406,676

8,199

1,892

270

China

36.4

20,781,652

170,202

39,277

5,596

New
Zealand

6.68

57,587

86

20

Philippines

48.9

1,981,529

21,802

5,031

717

NOTE: Assumes uniform distribution of deaths and children who are near to death will still be
immunised.
Infant mortality and births from 1998 Western Pacific Region Health Data Bank.
IMR= Infant mortality rate per live birth (can substitute for rate of any event).
N = Number in population (births used as proxy for numbers aged under one year).
nv = number of immunisation doses: assumed here to be three visits.
ppv = proportion of population vaccinated: assumed here to be 90% for each dose.
Note: in calculation of deaths the first line of equation shows number of total deaths in period, second
line adjusts for exposure to vaccine within that period, multiplied by the number of periods in the year.
Last updated: 05-03-2012

Copyright 2012 Immunisation Advisory Centre

www.immune.org.nz/adverse-events-following-immunisation-aefi

5/5