Professional Documents
Culture Documents
District of Katangawan
Review Period:
Position:
Date of Review:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
WEIGHT PER
KRA
June-October
2015
10%
Learning-Teaching Process Prepared daily lesson plans and daily logs of activities
including appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials within the rating period
20%
10%
10%
Pupils Outcomes
10%
Pupils Outcomes
10%
10%
5%
5%
2.5%
5.0%
2.5%
Plus Factor
2.5%
2.5%
Rater
Schools
ngawan
MENTARY SCHOOL
os City
ate of Review:
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RESULTS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
All daily lesson plans had the following objective, subject matter,
procedures, evaluation and assignment
Each part had a full description of what to do with an example
Objective was specific, measurable, attainable, result-oriented
and time-bound
100% and above developed high order thinking skills
Attained 100% and above of the desired learning competencies
100% and above based on the budget of work
AVE.
SCORE *
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
5.0
0.250
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
Poor
Ratee
Approving Authority
0.250
Name of Rater:
Position:
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Date of Review:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
Planned and organized SBM by April of every school
year
SBM Plan
TIMELINE
WEIGHT PER
KRA
Monitored teachers
School Curriculum
Evaluated the teaching-learning process based on
Monitoring and Evaluation results
Plan
School Resource
Management
Human Resource
Management
Special Assignment
2.5%
Plus Factor
Rater
Schools
ONAL HIGH SCHOOL
DIANGAS
SANTOS CITY
ame of Rater:
osition:
ate of Review:
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RESULTS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
100% SIP and AIP submitted and 100% and above were
implemented within target date
AVE.
SCORE *
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
100% SIP and AIP submitted and 100% and above were
implemented within target date
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
Poor
Ratee
Approving Authority
0.000
Name of Rater:
Position:
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Date of Review:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
Conducted at least an action research related to
school or classroom concerns/ problems during the
year
TIMELINE
WEIGHT PER
KRA
Instructional Competence
Instructional Supervision
Manage performance of teachers following the RPMS
cycle (planning and commitments, coaching and
monitoring, review and evaluation and development
planning)
Plus Factor
Rater
Schools
ONAL HIGH SCHOOL
DIANGAS
SANTOS CITY
ame of Rater:
osition:
ate of Review:
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RESULTS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
AVE.
SCORE *
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.000
Poor
Ratee
Approving Authority
0.000
0
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
Poor
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Very Satisfactory
Outstanding