Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S. Hnrtmnn. C. Pellegrini
Depnrtment of Physics, UCLA, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles. CA 90024 USA
T. Kntsoulcns
Department of Eleclrical Engineering, USC, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
Abstract (8 cm), and the spar size was measured outside of the plasma
The magnetic self-focusing of :I rckltivistic electron beam column. In the second experitncnt[S], ihe beam focused
propagating through a plasm:1 is demonstmled. The plnsmn outside of the plasm;t colutnn but the amount of radial
which is produced by an RF dischnrgc in n glass tube with no focusing was very litnited (in some cases the spot size
externally applied m:rgneGc field, focuses n 3.5 McV. 25 ps vnrintions were wilhin rhc experimental errors ). In this paper,
(FWHM) long electron beam from an initial size of 2.5 mm we report on a plasma lens experiment at LJCLA, where a 3.5
(FWHM) to about 0.5 mm (FWHM) at n focal length of 18 MeV elcclron bcntn was focused from an inilinl spot size of
cm. 2.5 mm (FWHM) lo about 0.S mm, well outside of Ihc plasma
column.
I. INTRODUCTION
II. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
A relativistic electron beam propagating through :1pl:rsma
can self pinch due to its self generated nzitnulhal magnetic The expcritnent was performed with the UCLA’s 4.5
field[l]. In vncuum. the bcnrn generated Lorcntz force McV. laser driven RF gun[(i]. The gun is capable of producing
counteracts the radial space chnrgc force and the bcntn very short (7 < 10 ps) clcclron bunches (Q > 1 nC, Ipeak >
propagates with nn equilibriutn radius. As the barn enters Ihc 100 .4) at 1 Hz. In order to simplify the diagnostics, the
plasma, the plasma clcclrons re-distribute thcmsclves lo clcclron bunches were stretched to about 25 ps (FWHM) by
charge neu~r:rlize the beam. If Ihc beam radius is small (r < illutnina(ing the cathotlc with :I longer laser pulse. The photo
c/w, = collisionless skin depth). tnosl of the pl;~nn return electroils arc nccelcmrcd to nbou~ 3.S Mcv in the I .S cell RF
currenfs will flow oufsidc of the IXX~ITI.As n rcsull. Ihe bcatn 0‘fun and trnnsporlcd usin,‘7 n focusing solenoid and four
magnetic field will not bc rcduccd apprecinbly within the steering tnagncts to the plasma chamber 2 m downstream of
beam, and it will focus under its own radial Lorcnlz force. the gun (Figure I). The plasma chnmbcr which is filled with
This mech:rnism an be used to gcncmtc focusing gl-adienls Ar gas up lo n pressure of Xl tnTorr is connected to the RF
exceeding MG/ctn which is several orders of magnitude gun (p < 5 x IOwx Torr) Ihrough n windowless, Iwo stage
greater Ihan the strength of conventional qundrupolc diffcrentinl pumping systctn (Figure I). Each pumping stage
mngnets[2]. consists of ;I low conductance tube followed by n
While a large number of Ihcoreticnl studies[2].[?] of lhis turbomolccul:~r pump. The first stage maintains n pressure
effect have been performed, there have been only two diffcrcntial of Ihrec orders of magnitude; while the second, a
cxperimenlal sludies[4],[5]. In (hc first cxpcritnent[4], Ihc diffcrenti:rl of two orders of magnitude. The electron beam
plasma lcnglh (35 cm) was much longer than the focal length which inilially contains up to I .S nC of charge, is scraped by
1 I
2
a
2
1
lOI7
1012
i
l
“1
.
14
1 h ‘I
0
16
0
n
20 40
j
60 80 100
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Time (ps)
r (InIn)
(b) Figure 3. Temporal Profile of the electron beam.
SlO’~~/, (, I,, , , I / / 1, I
calculation is for a beam with uniform density in space and
time. In reality, the focal strength of the lens is not constant
and has both longitudinal and radial variations.
2 00
x.3,012 .O 0 III. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
.‘j
m;c” 4 IO’?- 7 .*O 00 0
c The time integrated electron beam size and the total
0
O charge were measured 22 cm upstream of the plasma. The
2 2 10” I-
bcnm is about 2.5 mm FWHM in the vertical dimension, and
5‘li.,
a
:,,,/,,,/.::..:
110
- 1-
O i
I
10
Axial Position (cm)
I
IS
I-
contains up to .A nC of charge. The electron bunch length is
measured 27 cm downstream of plasma source by streaking
the Cerenkov ligh from n 0.5 mm thick fused silica[7]. Figure
3 shows the temporal profile of the electron bunch. It has n
sharp rise and n fairly long tail. The electron beam propagates
through the plasma and hits the first phosphor screen 18 cm
downstream of the plasma. Figure 4(n) shows the time
Figure 2. (a) Radial profile of plasma density. (b) Axial integrated beam size nt the first phosphor screen with no
profile of plasma density.
3544
PAC 1993
No Plasma Vertical Dimension (mm)
0 2 4 6 8 10
(a) (b)
Plasma on
Cd)
Y (mm)
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
Vertical Dimension (mm)
Figure 3. (a) Unfocused beam image 18 cm downstrcnm of plasma. source. (b) Vertical line out of image (a). (c) Focused
beam image. (d) Vertical line out of image (c).
plasmn. The beam dimensions are measured by Inking either n on the focusing. Furthermore, experimental results will be
vertical or horizontal line-out through the pixel with the compared with both particle simulation and analytical
highest intensity. As Figure 4 (b) shows. the vertical cnlculnlion results.
dimension of the unfocused beam is about 3.2 mm FWHM.
VI. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
When the plasma is turned on. the bcnm focuses down to
about 0.5 mm (Figs. 4 (c) and (d)). The spot size increases to The authors acknowledge helpful discussions with J.B.
about I.1 mm nt a second phosphor screen. 22 cm Roscnzweig. J.J. Su. and H. Zwi. Also, expert technical
downstream of the first. The apparent plasma focal length (1X assistance from N. Barov. M. Fauver, M. Hogan. P. Kwok. S.
cm) is shorter than that predicted from the thin lens Park, G. Tmvish, and R. Zhang is greatly appreciated. This
approximation (27 cm). This can be attributed in part to the work is supported by SDIO/lST through ONR Grant NOOO14-
finite length of the plasma. As lhc beam prop:lg:ltes through 90-J-1952 and US DOE Grant DE-FGO3-92ER-40493.
the plasma, it begins to focus within the lens, increases its
density, and shortens the lens focal length. V. REFERENCES
IV. FUTURE WORK 111P. Chen, Part. Accel. 20, 171 (1987).
I21 J.J. Su et. al... Phys. Rev. A 41, 3321 (1990). and
To learn more about the time dependent focusing of the
Rcfcrences thcrcin.
beam, the Ccrcnkov radiation from the focused elcclron beam
[3]P. Chcn. Phys. Rev. A 45, r3398 (1992).
has been streaked using a fast streak camera (temporal
[4] J. B. Rosenzwieg et. al., Phys. Fluids B 2 (6), 1376 (1990).
resolution = 3.5 ps). Currently. we are in the process of
[S] H. Nakanishi ct. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1870 (1991).
analyzing these results which will he reported elsewhere. We
[h) C. Pellegrini ct. al.. these proceedings.
also plan to investigate the effects of beam and plnsma density
[7] G. Hnirnpetian et. al., these proceedings.
354s
PAC 1993