Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TV Commercial
Affordable
TV Commercial
Affordable
Online
Affordable
Online
Affordable
Online
Affordable
Online
Affordable
Print ADVT
Affordable
Online
Affordable
I don't know
Affordable
Online
Costly
Retail outlets
Affordable
TV Commercial
Affordable
Online
Online
Online
Affordable
TV Commercial
Affordable
dnt knw
Retail outlets
Affordable
Online
Affordable
Print ADVT
Retail outlets
Affordable
Online
TV Commercial
Costly
TV Commercial
Online
Affordable
TV Commercial
TV Commercial
TV Commercial
TV Commercial
TV Commercial
TV Commercial
Online
Print ADVT
Online
Costly
Retail outlets
Affordable
Online
Affordable
Online
Costly
Retail outlets
Costly
TV Commercial
Online
Affordable
Online
Affordable
Online
Affordable
Online
Affordable
Online
Affordable
TV Commercial
Online
Affordable
Retail outlets
Online
Affordable
Value for money
3
3
5
2
4
3
4
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
1 week ago
1 week ago
1 week ago
1 month ago
never
6 months ago
never
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
Medium Quality
LED with HD
LED with HD
5
2
5
3
4
4
4
Name
2 Sailee
3 Harmeet
4 Aryan
4 JD
2 farheen
3 Vaibhav
2 Sean R
4 Malcolm
2 Shalaka
1 Kuch bhi bharo
3 y should i tell you
3
4 Roshan
3 Aryan
1 Conrad
1 Pooja bokadia
3 sanaya
3 Liz
2 Keyur
3 Alok
4 urvesh
3 vijay
3 vaishali
3 manoj
4 Brisbane
5 riya
5 riya
5 riya
5 riya
5 riya
5 geeta
4 janak
3 devanshi
4 niharika
4 nandish
3 sunny
3 dhiraj
4 chandn
5 Anand mishra
3 Swati
4 Ruhika.shah
4 Ruhika.shah
3 Yogesh Vaidya
3 Krishna muni
5 Minalee S Vetkar
3 Gaurav Adatiya
3 sachin
4 manisha
3 joyal
Gender
Age
Female
20 - 30
Male
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Male
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Male
20 - 30
Male
20 - 30
Male
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Female
41 - 50
Female
20 - 30
Male
20 - 30
Male
31 - 40
Male
20 - 30
Male
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Male
20 - 30
Male
20 - 30
Male
20 - 30
Male
31 - 40
Female
31 - 40
Male
20 - 30
Male
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Female
31 - 40
Male
31 - 40
Female
41 - 50
Female
31 - 40
Male
50 and above
Male
20 - 30
Male
31 - 40
Female
31 - 40
Male
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Male
20 - 30
Male
20 - 30
Female
20 - 30
Male
20 - 30
Male
31 - 40
Female
31 - 40
Male
20 - 30
x(Picture quality)
poor quality
medium
LCD
LED without HD
LED HD
LED with HD
LED without HD
LCD
LED with HD
LED without HD
LCD
Medium Quality
Medium Quality
Medium Quality
LCD with HD
LCD
LCD
LED with HD
LED without HD
LCD
Medium Quality
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED without HD
Medium Quality
LED without HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
Medium Quality
Medium Quality
Medium Quality
LCD
Medium Quality
LED without HD
LCD
Medium Quality
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
5
4
3
5
4
3
2
2
2
5
3
3
5
4
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
4
2
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
3
2
4
3
2
5
5
5
5
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
Medium Quality
LED with HD
LED with HD
LED with HD
5
5
5
5
2
5
5
5
Hypothesis
Affordable
27
18
Costly
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Costly
Affordable
Affordable
Value for money
Value for money
Affordable
Affordable
Value for money
Affordable
Affordable
Value for money
Affordable
Value for money
Costly
Value for money
Affordable
Value for money
Value for money
Value for money
Value for money
Value for money
Value for money
Value for money
Value for money
Costly
Affordable
Affordable
Costly
Costly
Value for money
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
3
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
1
1
3
3
2
1
1
1
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R
0.099697
R Square
0.009939
Adjusted R Squar -0.011126
Standard Error
0.680759
Observations
49
ANOVA
df
Regression
Residual
Total
Intercept
SS
MS
1 0.2186687467 0.218669
47 21.781331253 0.463433
48
22
Alpha Value
Interpretation
0.05
The P value here is 9.28 which states that it is abo
Conclusion
Affordable
Affordable
Value for money
Affordable
Value for money
Affordable
Value for money
Affordable
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
hesis (H0): There is no significant relationship between the picture quality and the perceived brand image for Micromax LED.
ypothesis (H1): There is a significant relationship between the picture quality and the perceived brand image for Micromax LED
F
Significance F
0.4718458655 0.495514679
P-value
Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
9.28779E-007 1.1436508191 2.410691 1.1436508191 2.410691355
0.495514679 -0.207364009
0.1018 -0.2073640095 0.101799787
which states that it is above the significance level 0.05 therefore we accept the null hypothesis.
ationship between the picture quality and the perceived brand image for micromax LED
Affordable
27 6 months ago
2
3
18 3 months ago
5 1 month ago
1 week ago
never
4
3
2
1
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Costly
Affordable
Affordable
Value for money
Value for money
Affordable
Affordable
Value for money
Affordable
Affordable
Value for money
Affordable
Value for money
Costly
Value for money
Affordable
Value for money
Value for money
Value for money
Value for money
Value for money
Value for money
Value for money
Value for money
Costly
Affordable
Affordable
Costly
Costly
Value for money
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
3
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
1
1
3
3
2
1 week ago
1 month ago
never
never
6 months ago
1 month ago
1 week ago
never
never
1 month ago
never
1 month ago
1 month ago
never
1 month ago
1 week ago
never
never
3 months ago
6 months ago
never
6 months ago
never
1 week ago
never
1 month ago
1 month ago
1 month ago
1 month ago
1 month ago
3 months ago
1 month ago
1 month ago
1 week ago
3 months ago
1 week ago
never
1 month ago
3 months ago
2
3
1
1
5
3
2
1
1
3
1
3
3
1
3
2
1
1
4
5
1
5
1
2
1
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
2
4
2
1
3
4
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Affordable
Value for money
Affordable
Value for money
Affordable
Value for money
Affordable
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1 month ago
never
never
1 week ago
1 week ago
1 week ago
1 month ago
never
6 months ago
never
6 months ago
3
1
1
2
2
2
3
1
5
1
5
Hypothesis
2)1. Null hypothesis (HO): There is no significant relationship between the percei
2. Alternate hypothesis (H1): There is a significant relationship between the perce
5
4
15
8
14
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R
0.0201555744
R Square
0.0004062472
Adjusted R Square
-0.020861705
Standard Error
1.3222376783
Observations
49
ANOVA
df
Regression
Residual
Total
Intercept
1
1
47
48
SS
MS
F
0.0333951763 0.033395 0.0191013773
82.1706864564 1.748312
82.2040816327
Coefficients
2.4081632653
0.038961039
Standard Error
t Stat
P-value
0.4815796945 5.00055 8.39657E-006
0.2819020202 0.138208 0.8906666926
Alpha Value
Interpretation
0.05
The P value here is 8.39 which states that it is way above the significance level (0.05) the
Conclusion
There is no signiifcant relationship between the precieved brand image and the percieve
elationship between the perceived brand image and the perceived brand recall for Micromax LED.
relationship between the perceived brand image and the perceived brand recall for Micromax LED.
Significance F
0.8906666926
Lower 95%
Upper 95%
Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
1.4393498995 3.376977 1.43935 3.376977
-0.5281526665 0.606075 -0.528153 0.606075
ed brand image and the percieved brand recall for micromax LED .
Age
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
20 - 30
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
20 - 30
20 - 30
31 - 40
31 - 40
31 - 40
31 - 40
31 - 40
31 - 40
31 - 40
31 - 40
31 - 40
31 - 40
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
41 - 50
41 - 50
> 50
Yes
Yes
No
1
1
2
3
3
4
> 50
Yes
Age
> 50
20 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
Code
Awareness code
4 No
1 Yes
2
3
2
1
H0: There is no
significant difference
Hypothesis
between age of
H1: There is
consumers and
significant difference
Awareness of
between age of
Micromax LED TV.
consumers and
Awareness of
Micromax LED TV.
Age
20 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
> 50
Code
1
2
3
4