Logistic Regression (Categorical Specified)

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa
N
Percent
Selected Cases
Included in Analysis
69
98.6
Missing Cases
1
1.4
Total
70
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
70
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value
Internal Value
.0
0
1.0
1
Categorical Variables Codings

MS

HEd

1.0
2.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
2.0

Frequency
33
31
3
1
1
59

Parameter coding
(1)
(2)
1.000
.000
.000
1.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
1.000
.000

3.0

.000

1.000

4.0

.000

.000

.0

38

1.000

1.0

31

.000

(3)
.000
.000
1.000
.000
.000

(4)
.000
.000
.000
1.000
.000

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Step 0

Observed
Y

.0
1.0
Overall Percentage

Predicted
Y
.0
40
29

1.0
0
0

Percentage
Correct
100.0
.0
58.0

a. Constant is included in the model.

b. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
Step 0

Constant

B
-.322

S.E.
.244

Wald
1.739

df
1

Variables not in the Equationa

Step 0

Variables

A
S(1)
MS
MS(1)
MS(2)
MS(3)
MS(4)

Score
2.909
2.122
8.418
5.653
5.941
.097
.736

df
1
1
4
1
1
1
1

Sig.
.088
.145
.077
.017
.015
.755
.391

Sig.
.187

Exp(B)
.725

FS
.346
1
.557
HEd
2.166
2
.339
HEd(1)
1.550
1
.213
HEd(2)
.171
1
.679
MI
16.757
1
.000
DR
.258
1
.612
HS
.158
1
.691
K
10.006
1
.002
P
8.774
1
.003
a. Residual Chi-Squares are not computed because of redundancies.

Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1

Step
Block
Model

Chi-square
37.048
37.048
37.048

df
14
14
14

Sig.
.001
.001
.001

Model Summary
Cox & Snell R
Nagelkerke R
Step
-2 Log likelihood
Square
Square
1
56.846a
.415
.559
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 20 because maximum
iterations has been reached. Final solution cannot be found.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step
Chi-square
df
1
4.033
8

Sig.
.854

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Y = .0
Y = 1.0
Observed
Expected
Observed
Step 1
1
7
6.860
0
2
6
6.500
1
3
6
6.116
1
4
5
5.690
2
5
5
4.887
2
6
6
4.313
1
7
3
3.302
4
8
2
1.511
5
9
0
.731
7
10
0
.089
6

Total
Expected
.140
.500
.884
1.310
2.113
2.687
3.698
5.489
6.269
5.911

Classification Tablea

Step 1

Observed
Y

.0
1.0
Overall Percentage

a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

Predicted
Y
.0
37
9

1.0
3
20

Percentage
Correct
92.5
69.0
82.6

7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6

Step 1a

B
-.019
-1.388

S.E.
.050
.798

MS(1)
MS(2)
MS(3)
MS(4)
FS
HEd

-23.120
-23.040
-24.375
-40.668
.161

40192.983
40192.983
40192.983
56841.452
.205

HEd(1)
HEd(2)
MI
DR
HS
K
P
Constant

-.110
-2.132
.000
-.382
-.047
-.181
1.148
18.679

A
S(1)
MS

Exp(B)
.981
.250

90% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower
Upper
.904
1.065
.067
.927

.000
.000
.000
.000
1.175

.000
.000
.000
.000
.838

.
.
.
.
1.647

.940
.279
.004
.349
.957
.720
.045

.896
.119
1.000
.683
.954
.834
3.151

.083
.005
1.000
.349
.228
.363
1.227

9.706
3.033
1.000
1.334
3.988
1.917
8.089

1.000

129486190.786

Wald
.143
3.026

df
1
1

Sig.
.706
.082

.438

.979

.000
.000
.000
.000
.617

1
1
1
1
1

1.000
1.000
1.000
.999
.432

1.601

.449

1.449
1.970
.000
.407
.870
.506
.573

.006
1.170
8.287
.878
.003
.129
4.009

1
1
1
1
1
1
1

40192.983

.000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: A, S, MS, FS, HEd, MI, DR, HS, K, P.

Correlation Matrix
Const
ant
Step Const
1.000
1
ant
A
.000
S(1)
.000
MS(1) -1.000
MS(2) -1.000
MS(3) -1.000
MS(4) -.707
FS
.000
HEd(1
.000
)
HEd(2
.000
)
MI
.000
DR
.000
HS
.000
K
.000
P
.000

MS(2)
1.000
.000
.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
.707
.000

MS(3)
1.000
.000
.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
.707
.000

MS(4) FS

HEd(
1)

HEd(
2)

MI

DR

HS

-.707

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

-.053
1.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
-.069

MS(1)
1.000
.000
.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
.707
.000

.000
.000
.707
.707
.707
1.000
.000

.028
-.069
.000
.000
.000
.000
1.000

.134
.004
.000
.000
.000
.000
-.098

.025
.264
.000
.000
.000
.000
-.028

-.149
-.197
.000
.000
.000
.000
-.101

-.111
.243
.000
.000
.000
.000
-.233

-.059
-.184
.000
.000
.000
.000
-.029

-.299
.319
.000
.000
.000
.000
.077

.334
-.405
.000
.000
.000
.000
.028

.134

.004

.000

.000

.000

.000

-.098

1.000 .569

.227

.112

.096

-.180

.236

.025

.264

.000

.000

.000

.000

-.028

.569

1.000

-.202

.219

.023

.018

-.168

-.149
-.111
-.059
-.299
.334

-.197
.243
-.184
.319
-.405

.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

-.101
-.233
-.029
.077
.028

.227
.112
.096
-.180
.236

-.202
.219
.023
.018
-.168

1.000
-.144
-.010
-.242
.387

-.144
1.000
.317
.221
-.359

-.010
.317
1.000
.096
-.140

-.242
.221
.096
1.000
-.751

.387
-.359
-.140
-.751
1.000

S(1)

.000

.000

1.000
-.053
.000
.000
.000
.000
.028

Logistic Regression (Categorical Not Specified)

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases

N
Percent
69
98.6
1
1.4
70
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
70
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
Total

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value
Internal Value
.0
0
1.0
1

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Step 0

Observed
Y

.0
1.0
Overall Percentage

Predicted
Y
.0
40
29

1.0
0
0

Percentage
Correct
100.0
.0
58.0

a. Constant is included in the model.

b. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
Step 0

Constant

B
-.322

S.E.
.244

Wald
1.739

df
1

Variables not in the Equationa

Score
df
Sig.
A
2.909
1
.088
S
2.122
1
.145
MS
1.868
1
.172
FS
.346
1
.557
HEd
2.080
1
.149
MI
16.757
1
.000
DR
.258
1
.612
HS
.158
1
.691
K
10.006
1
.002
P
8.774
1
.003
a. Residual Chi-Squares are not computed because of redundancies.
Step 0

Variables

Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1

Step
Block
Model

Chi-square
32.532
32.532
32.532

df
10
10
10

Sig.
.000
.000
.000

Model Summary
Step

-2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R

Square

Nagelkerke R
Square

Sig.
.187

Exp(B)
.725

1
61.362a
.376
.506
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter
estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step
Chi-square
df
1
12.538
8

Sig.
.129

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Y = .0
Y = 1.0
Observed
Expected
Observed
Step 1
1
6
6.618
1
2
7
6.307
0
3
5
6.067
2
4
6
5.529
1
5
5
5.051
2
6
6
4.259
1
7
1
3.395
6
8
4
1.925
3
9
0
.684
7
10
0
.165
6

Expected
.382
.693
.933
1.471
1.949
2.741
3.605
5.075
6.316
5.835

Total
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6

Classification Tablea

Step 1

Observed
Y

.0
1.0
Overall Percentage

Predicted
Y
.0
36
10

Percentage
Correct
90.0
65.5

1.0
4
19

79.7

a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

Step 1a

A
S
MS
FS
HEd
MI
DR
HS
K
P
Constant

B
-.018
.917
.294
.199
.242
.000
-.273
-.278
-.059
.891

S.E.
.046
.694
.354
.195
.602
.000
.367
.726
.500
.507

Wald
.153
1.749
.689
1.041
.161
8.017
.553
.147
.014
3.087

df
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Sig.
.695
.186
.406
.308
.688
.005
.457
.701
.906
.079

Exp(B)
.982
2.503
1.342
1.220
1.273
1.000
.761
.757
.943
2.438

-5.182

4.373

1.404

.236

.006

90% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower
Upper
.911
1.059
.800
7.835
.749
2.402
.885
1.680
.473
3.426
1.000
1.000
.416
1.391
.229
2.499
.414
2.147
1.059
5.617

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: A, S, MS, FS, HEd, MI, DR, HS, K, P.

Correlation Matrix
Constant A
Step 1 Constant 1.000
-.264

S
-.242

MS
-.174

FS
-.220

HEd
-.275

MI
.052

DR
-.138

HS
-.834

K
-.107

P
-.034

A
S
MS
FS
HEd
MI
DR
HS
K
P

-.264
-.242
-.174
-.220
-.275
.052
-.138
-.834
-.107
-.034

1.000
.098
-.303
.041
-.088
-.339
-.122
.062
-.332
.288

.098
1.000
.115
.113
.060
.039
-.148
.105
-.275
.281

-.303
.115
1.000
.249
-.128
.022
-.082
.115
.092
-.021

.041
.113
.249
1.000
.130
-.069
-.257
-.128
.041
.079

-.088
.060
-.128
.130
1.000
-.154
-.153
.039
.181
-.215

-.339
.039
.022
-.069
-.154
1.000
-.001
-.048
-.185
.234

-.122
-.148
-.082
-.257
-.153
-.001
1.000
.309
.170
-.237

.062
.105
.115
-.128
.039
-.048
.309
1.000
.101
-.151

-.332
-.275
.092
.041
.181
-.185
.170
.101
1.000
-.785

.288
.281
-.021
.079
-.215
.234
-.237
-.151
-.785
1.000

Logistic Regression (Occupation substituted by Position / Categorical: Sex and Marital

Status Specified)
Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa
Selected Cases

N
Percent
69
98.6
1
1.4
70
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
70
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
Total

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value
Internal Value
.0
0
1.0
1
Categorical Variables Codings

MS

1.0
2.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
.0

Frequency
33
31
3
1
1
38

Parameter coding
(1)
(2)
1.000
.000
.000
1.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
1.000

1.0

31

.000

(3)
.000
.000
1.000
.000
.000

(4)
.000
.000
.000
1.000
.000

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Step 0

Observed
Y

.0
1.0
Overall Percentage

Predicted
Y
.0
40
29

1.0
0
0

Percentage
Correct
100.0
.0
58.0

a. Constant is included in the model.

b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

Step 0

Constant

B
-.322

S.E.
.244

Wald
1.739

df
1

Score
2.909
2.122
8.418
5.653
5.941
.097
.736
.346
2.080
16.757
.258

df
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Sig.
.088
.145
.077
.017
.015
.755
.391
.557
.149
.000
.612

Variables not in the Equationa

Step 0

Variables

A
S(1)
MS
MS(1)
MS(2)
MS(3)
MS(4)
FS
HEd
MI
DR

Sig.
.187

Exp(B)
.725

HS
.158
1
.691
K
10.006
1
.002
P
8.774
1
.003
Position
7.435
1
.006
a. Residual Chi-Squares are not computed because of redundancies.

Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1

Step
Block
Model

Chi-square
35.521
35.521
35.521

df
14
14
14

Sig.
.001
.001
.001

Model Summary
Cox & Snell R
Nagelkerke R
Step
-2 Log likelihood
Square
Square
1
58.372a
.402
.541
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 20 because maximum
iterations has been reached. Final solution cannot be found.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step
Chi-square
df
1
3.145
8

Sig.
.925

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Y = .0
Y = 1.0
Observed
Expected
Observed
Step 1
1
7
6.729
0
2
6
6.415
1
3
6
6.066
1
4
5
5.706
2
5
5
4.937
2
6
5
4.302
2
7
3
3.329
4
8
3
1.845
4
9
0
.574
7
10
0
.098
6

Total
Expected
.271
.585
.934
1.294
2.063
2.698
3.671
5.155
6.426
5.902

7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6

Classification Tablea

Step 1

Observed
Y

.0
1.0
Overall Percentage

Predicted
Y
.0
36
9

Percentage
Correct
90.0
69.0

1.0
4
20

81.2

a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation
B

S.E.

Wald

df

Sig.

Exp(B)

90% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower
Upper

Step 1a

A
S(1)
MS

-.023
-1.142

.052
.744

MS(1)
MS(2)
MS(3)
MS(4)
FS
HEd
MI
DR
HS
K
P
Position
Constant

-23.600
-23.332
-24.522
-41.402
.169
-.181
.000
-.298
-.009
-.145
1.007
.074

40192.811
40192.811
40192.811
56841.331
.204
.656
.000
.384
.797
.502
.537
.434

19.415

40192.811

.200
2.356

1
1

.655
.125

.977
.319

.898
.094

1.064
1.085

.392

.983

.000
.000
.000
.000
.682
.076
7.250
.602
.000
.084
3.522
.029

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1.000
1.000
1.000
.999
.409
.783
.007
.438
.991
.773
.061
.864

.000
.000
.000
.000
1.184
.834
1.000
.742
.991
.865
2.737
1.077

.000
.000
.000
.000
.846
.284
1.000
.395
.267
.379
1.132
.528

.
.
.
.
1.657
2.454
1.000
1.396
3.673
1.975
6.616
2.199

.000

1.000

270159877.307

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: A, S, MS, FS, HEd, MI, DR, HS, K, P, Position.

Correlation Matrix

Step Const
1
ant
A
S(1)
MS(1)
MS(2)
MS(3)
MS(4)
FS
HEd
MI
DR
HS
K
P
Positi
on

Const
ant

MS(2)
1.000
.000
.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
.707
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

MS(3)
1.000
.000
.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
.707
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

MS(4) FS

HEd

MI

DR

HS

Positi
on

-.707

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

1.000
-.116
.000
.000
.000
.000
.064
-.109
-.116
-.130
-.015
-.273
.312

MS(1)
.000
1.000
-.116 .000
1.000 .000
.000
1.000
.000
1.000
.000
1.000
.000
.707
-.070 .000
.061
.000
-.107 .000
.211
.000
-.163 .000
.319
.000
-.342 .000

1.000

.000

.000
.000
-1.000
-1.000
-1.000
-.707
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

.000
.000
.707
.707
.707
1.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

.064
-.070
.000
.000
.000
.000
1.000
.118
-.053
-.238
-.065
.098
.008

-.109
.061
.000
.000
.000
.000
.118
1.000
-.239
-.104
-.082
.213
-.293

-.116
-.107
.000
.000
.000
.000
-.053
-.239
1.000
-.051
-.004
-.186
.289

-.130
.211
.000
.000
.000
.000
-.238
-.104
-.051
1.000
.299
.188
-.276

-.015
-.163
.000
.000
.000
.000
-.065
-.082
-.004
.299
1.000
.089
-.130

-.273
.319
.000
.000
.000
.000
.098
.213
-.186
.188
.089
1.000
-.767

.312
-.342
.000
.000
.000
.000
.008
-.293
.289
-.276
-.130
-.767
1.000

-.242
.066
.000
.000
.000
.000
-.200
-.037
-.231
.070
-.019
-.084
.079

.000

-.242

.066

.000

.000

.000

-.200

-.037

-.231

.070

-.019

-.084

.079

1.000

S(1)

.000

Logistic Regression (Occupation substituted by Position / No Categories specified)

Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa

Percent

Selected Cases

Included in Analysis
Missing Cases
Total

69
98.6
1
1.4
70
100.0
Unselected Cases
0
.0
Total
70
100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value
Internal Value
.0
0
1.0
1

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b
Predicted
Y
Step 0

Observed
Y

.0

1.0

.0
1.0
Overall Percentage

40
29

0
0

Percentage
Correct
100.0
.0
58.0

a. Constant is included in the model.

b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B
Step 0

Constant

-.322

S.E.
.244

Wald
1.739

df
1

Variables not in the Equationa

Score
df
A
2.909
1
S
2.122
1
MS
1.868
1
FS
.346
1
HEd
2.080
1
MI
16.757
1
DR
.258
1
HS
.158
1
K
10.006
1
P
8.774
1
Position
7.435
1
a. Residual Chi-Squares are not computed because of redundancies.
Step 0

Variables

Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Step 1

Step
Block
Model

Chi-square
32.546
32.546
32.546

df

Sig.
11
11
11

.001
.001
.001

Sig.
.088
.145
.172
.557
.149
.000
.612
.691
.002
.003
.006

Sig.
.187

Exp(B)
.725

Model Summary
Cox & Snell R
Nagelkerke R
Step
-2 Log likelihood
Square
Square
1
61.347a
.376
.506
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter
estimates changed by less than .001.

Step
1

Step 1

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Chi-square
df
6.723
8

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Sig.
.567

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Y = .0
Y = 1.0
Observed
Expected
Observed
Expected
6
6.621
1
.379
6
6.311
1
.689
6
6.062
1
.938
6
5.543
1
1.457
5
5.040
2
1.960
5
4.222
2
2.778
2
3.400
5
3.600
4
1.969
3
5.031
0
.668
7
6.332
0
.166
6
5.834

Total
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6

Classification Tablea
Predicted
Y
Step 1

Observed
Y

.0

.0
1.0
Overall Percentage

1.0
36
10

4
19

Percentage
Correct
90.0
65.5
79.7

a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B
Step 1a

A
S
MS
FS

-.020
.909
.294
.194

S.E.
.048
.697
.356
.198

Wald
.167
1.703
.682
.965

df
1
1
1
1

Sig.
.683
.192
.409
.326

Exp(B)
.981
2.483
1.341
1.215

90% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower
Upper
.907
1.061
.789
7.811
.747
2.408
.877
1.682

HEd
MI
DR
HS
K
P
Position
Constant

.236
.000
-.267
-.281
-.062
.895
.052

.603
.000
.371
.727
.501
.508
.434

.153
7.362
.518
.149
.015
3.099
.015

1
1
1
1
1
1
1

.696
.007
.472
.699
.902
.078
.904

1.266
1.000
.765
.755
.940
2.447
1.054

-5.158

4.381

1.386

.239

.006

.469
1.000
.416
.228
.412
1.060
.516

3.416
1.000
1.410
2.497
2.143
5.647
2.152

Position

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: A, S, MS, FS, HEd, MI, DR, HS, K, P, Position.

Correlation Matrix
Consta
nt
Step
1

Consta
nt
A
S
MS
FS
HEd
MI
DR
HS
K
P
Position

MS

FS

HEd

1.000

-.265

-.244

-.175

-.224

-.278

-.265
-.244
-.175
-.224
-.278
.044
-.125
-.835
-.113
-.029
.045

1.000
.120
-.295
.082
-.064
-.256
-.150
.068
-.305
.258
-.270

.120
1.000
.115
.125
.066
.066
-.156
.108
-.269
.273
-.097

-.295
.115
1.000
.249
-.127
.025
-.082
.116
.093
-.021
-.004

.082
.125
.249
1.000
.139
-.021
-.270
-.119
.054
.062
-.179

-.064
.066
-.127
.139
1.000
-.134
-.162
.044
.189
-.224
-.078

MI

DR

HS

.044

-.125

-.835

-.113

-.029

.045

-.256
.066
.025
-.021
-.134
1.000
-.027
-.046
-.173
.220
-.234

-.150
-.156
-.082
-.270
-.162
-.027
1.000
.295
.158
-.223
.125

.068
.108
.116
-.119
.044
-.046
.295
1.000
.104
-.153
-.028

-.305
-.269
.093
.054
.189
-.173
.158
.104
1.000
-.785
-.052

.258
.273
-.021
.062
-.224
.220
-.223
-.153
-.785
1.000
.062

-.270
-.097
-.004
-.179
-.078
-.234
.125
-.028
-.052
.062
1.000