The way the Textile Industry Convinced Everyone That Nudity

is Bad
While most individuals don't think about the historical political impact of the clothes they
wear, the textile industry and textiles has in fact had a great impact on societies around the
globe, and still do today. It must be recalled that prior to the European Renaissance and
Industrial Revolution, most Earth's human population was (and still is) focused about the
equator in tropical and semi-tropical areas.
European and other temperate zone, sub-arctic, and arctic populations traditionally
necessitated hand-made garments (commonly of animal skins and pelts, wool, insect
byproducts such as silk, hand processed leaves and tree barks, and hand/loom woven plant
fibers such as linen, hemp, and cotton) for protection from the elements.
Desert home peoples also traditionally required clothes for protection from overexposure to
the harmful ultraviolet rays of sunlight. In a few of these societies loom woven fabrics and
handcraft textiles became a valued art, gaining prosperous weavers and merchant classes.
People also wore clothes to indicate their socio-economic standing, and spiritual offices.
Nevertheless, for most individuals all over the world, outside of little elite aristocracies,
affluent merchant classes, the religious establishment, and societies heavily impacted by
handcraft cloth and merchant guilds, clothing was mostly worn for practical functional
purposes, and not required when impractical, for example for swimming, or for working in hot
humid conditions.
Cloth body concealment wasn't ascribed any moral dimension as emblematic of innocence or
modesty. The nude human body was connected with poverty at purity, truthfulness and worst
and was, at some time, not directly associated with human sexuality by the majority of
Earth's peoples.
Slaves - clothes, nudity, colonization and the textile industry
Then, in 1750 the textile mill was devised in England. This created great wealth for the
owners of textile mills, and agricultural property barons that supplied cotton, wool, and other
raw materials to be woven into textile fabrics for clothes (as well as for rope, boat sails,
construction materials and other uses).
As garments was the important profit generating end use of the textile mill owners
merchandises, it became imperative because of their local inhabitants to be indoctrinated
with the "demand" for material body concealment at all times to maintain continual gains.
This indoctrination also solidified the positions of the aristocracy by direct transfer of wealth in
the masses via textile clothing purchases, by designating particular clothes styles as
tremendously expensive and only to be worn by aristocrats, and by designating many
different clothing fashions for each sex, age, class, and commerce, area, activity, and sect,
thus reinforcing divisions within the general public, making them more easily subdivided and
controlled.
Once the masses accepted the practice of constant cloth body concealment (regularly
indoctrinated though the church, the best proponent of new ideas accessible to the
aristocracy at that time) the abundance of the textile producers was insured for generations.
Religious organizations in Asia and textile producers had followed a similar path to
http://termx.net/flavi/nude-beach-erection.php and continuous profits within faiths and their

own areas as well.

As the technology of the industrial revolution advanced it became possible for the textile
producers to furnish more clothing than was demanded by local inhabitants, and the makers
were consequently compelled to seek elsewhere to advertise their products.
So colonial expansion was greatly quickened. The European aristocracy sought new markets
for the products (primarily textiles, along with alcoholic beverages, and weapons), cheap
labor, and new environmental resource lands to create its needed raw materials (mainly
cotton and wool). The church sought new converts to its authoritarian belief systems,
including of course cloth body concealment in the least times as a matter of piety, morality,
decency, and culture.
Authorities sought expansion of increase in their national wealth, tax base, and their global
influence. Governments also sought to enforce cloth body concealment as a matter of "law"
and social "order" as the practice became standard within their own people and moneymaking elsewhere within their colonies. Enough indoctrinated populations themselves
supposed the notion they were made pious, moral, small, adequate, and pure through the
practice of material body concealment.
On the other hand, the many cruel atrocities performed by the European church during the
middle ages (largely rooting out indigenous conventional holistic counselors, scientific
knowledge bearers, and treating professionals, many of which were women), the witch trials
of Salem Massachusetts, the international slave trade, two world wars, hundreds of big and
small scale military conflicts, and millions of more recent violent criminal psychopathic
actions tells quite a different history.
Police officer "Smokey" Buchanan quantifies swimsuit of Betty Fringle on Palm Beach, to see
that its length matches swimsuit regulations - 1925
There are other means than authoritarian hierarchical institutions for textile makers to
indoctrinate their false that is pervasive message of the requirement of material body
concealment all the time today.
Television induces highly suggestible trance states allowing programming to access the
subconscious as well as the conscious mind.
Heads captivate with narratives that are engaging and shiny vibrant brilliant pictures. Papers
expound the storylines mass media consensus determines to be most profitable. The web
interacts and participates with the minds of its users. Marketing more and more invades
every aspect of our daily life.
Meanwhile women are attacked by various kinds of violence, children are harassed to the
point of suicide, people starve themselves to death from hate for and discontent with their
bodies, and folks are habitually ostracized, bullied, assaulted, raped, and murdered for what
they choose to wear.
Actually, garments liberty (the ability of any person to wear or not wear whatever naked
beach dildos need without negative repercussions or consequences) can be a fair indicator
of independence generally within certain society.
From what I 've seen in my travels abroad, liberty and self-determination have a tendency to
abound in the societies where clothes freedom exists. In the societies where garments
independence is denied, authoritarian hierarchy predominates and other personal freedoms
can also be at risk.