Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unfortunately, its an
activity seldom accepted by HR professionals as a legitimate mandate. While most HR
professionals acknowledge that their job entails establishing policy, procedures, and
programs governing people management, few attempt to connect such elements to
increasing employee output (volume, speed, and quality) per each dollar spent on labor
costs (or as an easier to measure alternative, revenue per employee).
Bonus programs are typically enacted that keep total compensation in line with market
trends, regardless of the value of work warranting incentive comp. Training tools are often
secured via the lowest-cost provider method with minimal consideration given to which
provider would be most effective. Recruiting practices too are more often managed with
the primary goal of minimizing cost, not enabling business capability/capacity. Regardless
of the function you look at, in the typical organization, HR is more concerned with
executing transactions instead of delivering productivity solutions.
If you believe as most should that the combined efforts of the human resource function
should positively influence the performance capability of the workforce instead of
hindering it, you should understand the factors that influence performance.
2.
2.
A defined purpose for teams make roles clear every business unit and team
needs to understand its role. Managers and leaders need to develop a clear and
communicated purpose that is both compelling and that makes members feel
important. Understand that employees are more likely to be committed to the
purpose of the unit or team if they are involved in creating it. An unclear mission will
result in a lack of focus and a low level of engagement and commitment toward
achieving it.
3.
Team and individual goals having clear operational goals lets everyone know
what is expected. If these goals are communicated and measurable, employees will
understand precisely what is important and what is not. If stretch but reachable
goals are set, employees are less likely to become complacent.
4.
5.
6.
Effective rewards drive performance when monetary rewards are tied directly
to performance and the metrics for each goal, you doubly reinforce the message
about what is important. Individual and team monetary rewards, coupled with
nonmonetary excitement factors, can play a major role in ensuring focus and
consistent performance.
Support Factors
1.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Not having the appropriate inputs can hinder productivity in most cases, team
and employee work is dependent on the inputs provided from other processes. It is
the managers role to ensure that these inputs are provided on time and of the right
quality. Make sure that the teams output meets the standards set by the team
responsible for the next step in the production process.
7.
Barriers to productivity can limit success often, even when every one of the
positive productivity factors are present, productivity can be slowed or stopped by
real or imagined barriers. These roadblocks can include individuals resistant to
change, corporate politics, personal jealousies, corporate rivalries, as well as
powerful people. In addition, there may be perceived or imaginative barriers that
keep employees from even attempting any effort aimed at increasing productivity or
2.
3.
Resourcing Factors
1.
Insufficient budget resources can hamper productivity even a great team with a
great manager will produce lower levels of productivity when with insufficient
budget to complete the job.
2.
Technology, tools, and equipment can limit or bolster productivity even highly
trained, motivated, and engaged employees cant be very productive when they are
provided with insufficient tools and equipment to do their job. In an era where
technology dominates almost every function, a failure to provide the technology,
updates, or sufficient training can dramatically slow productivity.
Miscellaneous Factors
1.
2.
Final Thoughts
Managing workforce productivity involves accepting responsibility for optimizing the ROI
(return on investment) for labor expense, just as other functions do for their activities.
While some in HR would argue that its the managers role to increase productivity, its
safe to assume that managers are not experts, nor are they knowledgeable about how to
do so.
If you work in HR or talent management and you are looking for an opportunity to have a
major strategic impact, consider setting up an internal productivity consultant team that
provides the same kind of high-quality expert advice that a McKinsey or BCG might
provide (only with better knowledge of the company problems, opportunities, and
culture).
No one in any organization has complete control over these 22 factors, but the HR
function can use its well-known relationship-building and persuasive skills to influence
those outside their direct span of control. Since no one in the organization currently
owns productivity improvement, you wont have a lot of competition for the role, at least
until you start to make progress!