Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objectives
General objectives
The general objective is to create a tool able to form-find structures composed by pure
compressed arches and tensioned cable nets under the load of the pre-stress forces. The tool will
be developed in the Grasshopper environment in order to be available as a design tool for
Rhinoceros users.
Sub-objectives
The first sub-objective is to select or elaborate form-finding direct methods. Since they do not
require iterations they can be easily written and combined together.
The second sub-objective is to combine the selected direct methods in an iterative process able to
preserve the fixed boundary conditions.
The third sub-objective is to guarantee the convergence of the iterative process to a unique
solution.
A last sub-objective is to demonstrate the structural efficacy of the form-finding tool developed.
Final products
The main product will be the form-finding tool itself
The secondary product will be a report explaining the tool background, its developments, its final
structure, a generic design application and its verification.
The third product will be the slides to support the final oral presentation of the project.
Hypothesis about the direction of the solution
The main direction of the solution is combining direct form-finding methods. Iterations should
just be used to link different form-finding techniques into an hybrid form-finding algorithm.
Boundary conditions
A pavilion typology will be developed in order to set the design boundary conditions. A clever
structural concept is in fact needed before the application of the developed tool. Parameterization
of the pavilion boundary conditions will be used in order to compare different form-finding
resulting structures.
The only shaping forces are the pre-stress of the tensile elements and the self weight of the arch.
External loads like wind are not involved in the form-finding process and can cause moments in
the reality.
Research questions
Main research question
The main research question is how to design optimal support arches in membranes and cable net
structures. In order to do that an hybrid form-finding tool will be developed.
Sub-questions
The first sub-question is which are the most suitable form-finding methods
The second sub-question is how should the form-finding methods be combined together
The third sub-question is how and if a unique solution exists according to the set boundaries
The forth sub-question is if the developed tool applications are performing as desired and if not
what are the lacks of the developed method.
Background questions
The main background question is how a form-finding tool should be used in the design process.
Background sub-questions are about the stage in which they should be involved in the process
and the effective efficacy of the tool by checking the structural performances of its design
application.
Approach and methodology
Research questions into report parts or chapters
Methodology of research
The methodology of the research is planned step by step according to the following scheme
STEP I
Research questions
and objectives definition
STEP II
Hybrid form-finding
design tool development
STEP III
Hybrid form-finding
design tool application
STEP IV
Designed pavilion
structural verification
Selection of study
material theories
More mathematics,
mechanics and scripting
studies needed to
achieve the set goals
Structural concept
elaboration for a generic
pavilion
Translation of the
concept into a
parametric model with
BC (boundary conditions)
Combination of the
form-finding tool with
the structural concept of
the pavilion
Reflections and
considerations
Report elaboration
Presentation elaboration
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Relevance
Societal relevance
Building according to structural mechanics form-finding methods requires the collaboration of
both structural engineering and architects since the first steps of the design process. However
digital tools can be developed for architects in order to be more independent while investigating
design possibilities. The contemporary designers do not need to be able to make hard calculation
but just to understand the boundary conditions and the process governing the selected digital
tool. By doing so the proposed developed form-finding technique can be used consciously in
order to obtain performing light structures by optimizing the overall shape. The designer will be
able to shape the building starting from a structural concept by playing with the governing forces
and the given boundary conditions. The societal relevance is therefore the possibility to have an
integrated design process in which the designer is free to explore both the aesthetics as well as
the structural performances without getting lost into hard calculations.
Scientific relevance
The project is about a new tool for form-finding the supporting arches of tensile structures. In the
past century a lot of research has been done on the form finding methods of both tensile and
compressive structures. The digital form finding was inspired by physical experiments, used by
designers like Antoni Gaudi and Heinz Isler. However a clear limit of physical methods was not
just the accuracy of the models but also their restriction to structures that are only compressed or
tensioned. The digital environment opens the possibility to combine this two different kind of
structures into an hybrid form finding technique. For instance the membrane shape depend on the
internal pre-stresses as well as on the geometry of its supports, while the ideal shape of a
supporting arch is linked to the membrane reaction forces. The two form-finding processes can
be combined into an iterative process able to give back a structure where the pre-stressed
membrane generates only pure compression into the designed supporting arches. The working
environment will be Grasshopper for Rhino in order to have a tool available since the earlier
stages of the design process. The developed tool will not be just a translation of mathematical
theories giving back results similar to the physical experiments like hanging and soap-film
models. Its relevance is to combine those theories into a digital design tool able to form-find
hybrid structures that are not possible to be described by simple physical experiment.
References
Selected literature
Maximum height
Number of arches
Arches divisions
Discrete
arch
points
elements
points
coordinates
Membrane
elements
connectivity
Membrane
elements
FD
Main cable
elements
connectivity
Main cable
elements FD
Membrane
elements
new point
coordinate
s
Membrane
elements
lengths
Membrane
element prestress forces
Membrane
reaction
forces
Vertical
forces
of
ground
ties
Discrete arch
new point
coordinates
d xy < k
NO
Loop
YES
Final
geometry
Four basic structural elements can be distinguished in the proposed structural design concept:
the arches, the membrane, the pre-stress cables and the vertical anchored ties