Professional Documents
Culture Documents
32
Presentation: oral
1650-1
GHANI ET AL.
HWC in native followed by pastoral, cropping and market gardening soils. There was
strong positive correlation between HWC and microbial biomass-C, total carbohydrates
and mineralisable N and microaggregate stability. It is evident from these results that
HWC is an integrated measurement which correlates with key biological and physical
attributes of soils. In comparison to other measurements, HWC determination is
considerably easier, economic and less time consuming. Total analysis of hot-water
extracts showed that it also extracts significant amounts of labile forms of N, S and to
some extent P. Generally, storage of soil samples over 6 months tended to increase the
amounts of HWC. The proportion of increase varied between soils.
Keywords: hot-water C, microbial biomass, mineralisable N, soil microaggregate
Introduction
Soil organic matter or organic carbon is regarded as one of the main indicators of
soil quality responsible for a number of key soil physical, chemical and biological
functions in soil-plant-animal ecosystem (Gregorich et al., 1994). However, the rate of
change in the total organic pool is relatively slow and often difficult to detect. Hot-water
C (HWC) is a subset of soil organic C pool, relatively labile in nature (Sparling et al.,
1998; Ghani et al., 1999), and hence it is likely to reflect changes in soil-plant
management. We investigated the usefulness of this indicator in detecting changes in a
pastoral ecosystem where changes in grazing intensity, N and P fertiliser were made.
The spatial and temporal variability in hot-water C and impacts of short and long-term
storage of samples were also investigated. The effects on HWC of ecosystem changes
(native bush, pastoral agriculture, cropping and market gardening) on the same soil type
were also examined.
Materials and Methods
A total of 118 sites were sampled from four different soil orders namely; allophanic
(66), pumice (14), brown (20) and pallic (28) soils. Samples were collected
predominantly from pasture sites which have been under long-term dairy or sheep/beef
grazing. However, for comparative purposes a number of samples were also collected
from adjacent cropping, market gardening, native bush and forestry sites. Sixty soil
cores (25 mm diameter and 75 mm depth) were collected from a transact of 100 x 6 M2
at each sampling site. Field-moist soil samples were sieved (2 mm) and analysed for
microbial biomass C and N (Vance et al., 1987; Brookes et al., 1982), mineralisable N
(Keeny and Bremner, 1961), total C, N (Ghani et al., 2000), water extractable C, and
HWC (Ghani et al., 1999). HWC was also measured in air-dried and frozen samples.
Soil aggregation characteristics were also measured using a standard wet sieving
technique (Chenny and Swift, 1986). Standard soil fertility measurements were made
using approved methods. To determine the effects of N or P fertilisers on the HWC and
other soil biochemical measurements, soil samples were also analysed from long-term
N or P fertiliser trials located on allophanic soils (Ghani et al., 2002).
Results and Discussion
Impact of land use on HWC
Our results show that HWC is a sensitive measure for determining subtle changes
within or across ecosystems caused by the management practices. The HWC was
1650-2
GHANI ET AL.
4000
3500
4000
*
3000
3000
2000
2500
2000
1000
1500
1000
Sheep/Beef
HWC (?g
(g CC/g
g-1 soil)
HWC
soil)
3500
Dairy
Market
Garden
5000
3000
Cropping
Dairy Pasture
Native
4000
2500
3000
2000
2000
1500
1000
1000
0
200
400
30
50
-1
100
-1
Rates of P (kg P ha y )
Figure 1 (A) Effect of grazing intensities on HWC in soils. Error bars are standard
error of difference of means, (B) Effects of land use on HWC in soils, (C and
D) Effects of N or P applications on HWC. Error bars are standard errors
from the mean values.
Correlation with other soil properties
Our studies showed strong positive correlation between HWC and soil microbial
biomass C (r2 = 0.90) and anaerobically mineralisable N (r2= 0.82) as shown in Figure 2.
A number of studies have advocated inclusion of microbial biomass-C and
mineralisable N in the index of soil quality.
Given such a strong positive correlation between HWC and soil microbial biomassC and mineralisable N, the current research indicates that HWC can be used as a
surrogate measure for assessing these two key components in soils. In comparison to
both microbial biomass-C and mineralisable N, HWC is easier, less time consuming and
1650-3
GHANI ET AL.
relatively less expensive to measure. Also, automation of HWC analysis can save
considerable amounts of time.
A
1200
Microbial
C (g g-1 soil)
Microbial C (?g/g soil)
y = 0.2845x - 111.76
2
R = 0.9022
1000
800
600
400
200
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
400
y = 0.0605x + 10.417
350
R = 0.8211
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
HWC
(?g
C/kg
soil)
HWC
(g
C/kg
soil)
400
y = 0.0605x + 10.417
350
R = 0.8211
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
HWC
HWC(?g
(gC/kg
C kg-1soil)
soil)
Carbohydrate-C
(?g C g-1 soil)
2200
2000
y = 0.52x - 258.2
R2 = 0.88
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
-1
HWC (g C kg-1 soil)
HWC
(g(?g
C kg
soil)
-1
HWC
Cg
soil)
1650-4
GHANI ET AL.
1650-5
GHANI ET AL.
1650-6