Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
1.
Introduction..............................................................................................................2
2.
classification( 1a)............................................................................................................................3
3.
given. (1b)
The need for and operation of, different costing methods on the information
5
4.
The costs using appropriate technique for the production bandsaw blades. (1c). .8
5.
6.
7.
The principles of quality and value and identify potential improvements. (2c)
17
8.
Conclusion..............................................................................................................22
9.
References...............................................................................................................22
Direct cost
Direct manufacturing labor
Direct material inventory Jan. 1, 2010
Direct material inventory Dec. 31,2010
Work-in-process inventory Jan. 1,2010
Work-in-process inventory Dec.
31,2010
Direct material purchased
Indirect cost
Sandpaper
Material handling costs
Lubricants and coolants
Miscellaneous indirect manufacturing
labor
Plan leasing costs
Depreciation plant equipment
Property taxes on plant equipment
Fire insurance on plant equipment
Marketing promotions
Marketing salaries
Distribution costs
Customers service costs
Fixed cost
Plant-leasing costs
Depreciationplant equipment
Property taxes on plant equipment
Fire insurance on plant equipment
Marketing promotions
Marketing salaries
Distribution costs
Customer-service costs
Variable cost
Sandpaper
Materials-handling costs
Lubricants and coolants
Miscellaneous indirect manufacturing labor
Direct manufacturing labor
Direct materials inventory Jan. 1, 2010
Direct materials inventory Dec. 31, 2010
Work-in-process inventory Jan. 1, 2010
Work-in-process inventory Dec. 31, 2010
Direct materials purchased
Income Statement
For the year Ended December 31, 2010
Revenue
$
1,360,000
Revenue
Cost of good sold
Begging finished good inventory jan 1 2010
Cost of good manufactory
Good availabe manufactory
Ending finishaed good inventory Dec 1
2010
$
100,000
$
960,000
$
1,060,000
$
150,000
$
910,000
$
450,000
$
60,000
$
100,000
$
70,000
$
100,000
$
330,000
$
120,000
$
$
120,000
$
$
120,000
Cost of good sold = Beginning finished goods inventory Jan 1, 2010 + Cost of goods
manufactured Deduct ending finished goods inventory Dec 31,2001 = $100,000 +
Direct materials
Beginning inventory, Jan 1, 2010
Purchases of direct materials
Cost of direct materials available for
use
Ending inventory, Dec 31, 2010
Direct materials used
Direct manufacturing labor
Indirect manufacturing costs
Sandpaper
Materials-handling costs
Lubricants and coolants
Miscellaneous indirect manufacturing
labor
Plant-leasing costs
Depreciation-plant equipment
Property taxes on plant equipment
Fire insurance on plant equipment
$ 40,000
$ 460,000
$ 500,000
$ 50,000
$ 450,000
$ 300,000
$
$
$
2,000
70,000
5,000
(V)
(V)
(V)
$
$
$
$
$
40,000
54,000
36,000
4,000
3,000
(V)
(F)
(F)
(F)
(F)
$ 214,000
$ 964,000
$ 960,000
$ 10,000
$ 974,000
$
14,000
(V)
(V)
The table Schedule of cost of goods manufactured above was calculated as follow:
Cost of direct materials available for use = Beginning inventory, Jan 1, 2010 + Purchase
$3,000 = $214,000.
Manufacturing costs incurred during 2010 = Direct material used + Direct manufacturing
to $500,000
In addition, The unit cost would be unaffected: $500,000: 1,000,000 units = $0.50 per
unit.
In contrast, the plant-leasing costs are fixed of $54,000, so the total would not increase.
However, the plant-leasing cost per unit would decrease from $0.060 to $0.054 = $54,000:
1,000,000 units.
4. The costs using appropriate technique for the production bandsaw blades. (1c)
Opening
stock
Closing
stock
June
$
$
1,200
July
$
1,200
$
400
A marginal costing system will value all units at the variable production cost of $25
($18+$4+$3) per unit.
Profit statement for marginal costing
June
july
$
Sales revenue
640,000
$
$
Opening stock
30,000
Variable production
$
$
cost
350,000
255,000
$
$
350,000
285,000
Less value of closing
$
$
stock
30,000
10,000
$
Variable cost of sale
320,000
$
Contribution
320,000
$
Overhead
203,000
$
Profit/(loss)
117,000
$
Profit/(loss) per unit
9.14
$
550,000
$
275,000
$
275,000
$
194,000
$
81,000
$
7.4
$
25
$
25
Absorption costing:
In absorption costing (some times referred to as full costing)
a. Closing stocks are valued at full production cost, and include a share of fixed
production costs.
b. This means that the cost of sales in a period will include some fixed overhead
incurred in a previous period (in opening stock values) and will exclude some fixed
overhead incurred in the current period but carried forward in closing stock values
as a charge to a subsequent accounting period.
Budgerd
99000
Direct material
Direct wages
Variable production overhead
June
$
126,000
$
27,000
July
$
91,800
$
(7,200)
$
18
$
4
$
3
$
25
$
9
$
34
Variable cost
Production overhead
Full cost
10
July
$
14,000
$
26,000
$
55,000
$
95,000
Marginal
costing
Absorption
costing
June
$
117,000
$
127,800
$
10,800
July
$
550,000
$
40,800
$
346,800
$
(13,600)
$
374,000
$
7,200
$
381,200
$
168,800
$
95,000
$
73,800
Reconcilation
July
$ 81,000
$ 73,800
$ 7,200
11
Sales
revenue
Gross profit
Net Profit
June
July
$
640,000
$
204,800
$
127,800
$
550,000
$
176,000
$
73,800
$700,000
$600,000
$640,000
$550,000
$500,000
$400,000
$300,000
$204,800
$176,000
$200,000
June
$127,800
$73,800
July
$100,000
$-
Sales revenue
Gross profit
Net Profit
According to the histogram, we can see that there was a noticeable change of Foxwood
revenue and profit between June and July. For June to July, the company revenue increased from
12
640,000.00
50.00
Direct Material
252,000.0
0
18.00
Direct wages
56,000.00
4.00
42,000.00
3.00
Prime cost
350,000.0
0
126,000.0
0
9.00
13
476,000.0
0
40,800.00
435,200.00
Gross profit
Less selling and administration
expense
204,800.00
16.00
26,000.00
2.03
14,000.00
1.09
64,000.00
5.00
104,000.00
100,800.00
7.88
27,000.00
2.11
127,800.00
9.99
512,200.00
40.02
14
550,000.00
50.00
Direct Material
183,600.0
0
18.00
Direct wages
40,800.00
4.00
30,600.00
3.00
Prime cost
Fixed production overhead at 34$ per
unit (10200 units )
Add: openning stock at $34 per
units(1200)
Full production cost (11400units)
Less: closing stock of finished
good(400units)
Full production cost of sale(11000
units)
255,000.
00
91,800.00
9.00
40,800.00
387,600.
00
13,600.00
374,000.00
Gross profit
Less selling and administration
expense
176,000.00
16.00
26,000.00
2.36
14,000.00
1.27
64,000.00
5.00
95,000.00
81,000.00
7.36
(7,200.00)
(0.65)
73,800.00
6.71
476,200.00
43.29
15
After QPM
- Equirements: 5000 units
- Pecification failure: 125 units
- Total: 5125 units
During final inspection stage, Foxwood will lose 12,5 % of total finished
product.But after the application of QPM, it cut down to 2.5%
Before QPM:
12,5
Downgrading= 5250 (100 12,5 ) = 750 units
After QPM:
Downgrading=5250
7,5
=416units
( 100 7,5 )
The totals product Foxwood need to produce follow the table below:
Productivity
Before QPM
Units
After QPM
Units
16
5,000
5,000
250
125
5,250
5,125
750
416
6,000
5,541
b. Efficiency: Here it will be calculated and evaluated on the purchase of basic materials
and processing, product loss and scrapped.
Before and After QPM, Foxwood produce 6000 units and 5541 units
Before QPM:
After QPM:
48000
44328
4
=2000 sp . meter
(100 4 )
2,5
=1137 sp . meter
(100 2,5)
Before QPM
-
After QPM
(sq. meter)
(sq. meter)
Urchasing of material: 48000
- Equirements: 44328
Rocessing waste: 2000
- Reocessing waste: 1137
Total: 50000
- Total: 45465
Upon receipt of materials from suppliers, the Foxwood also removed with
5% of raw materials received from suppliers. But after the application of
QPM, it dropped to 3%.
Before QPM
Scrapped =50000
After QPM
Scrapped =45465
5
=2631
(100 5 )
3
=1406
( 100 3 )
17
Before QPM
Square
metter
After QPM
Square
metter
Purchasing of material
48,000
44,328
Processing loss
2,000
1,137
50,000
45,465
2,632
1,406
52,632
46,871
Scrapped
c. Effectiveness: we can depend on gross machine hours and idle time to calculate the
effectiveness.
Gross machine hour: When producing a product unit, Foxwood need to
take 0.6 hours to run the machine. With the application of QPM, Foxwood
Efficiency
12,5
=395,79 hours
( 100 12,5 )
Before QPM
Hours
3,600
After QPM
Hours
2,771
18
Idle time
900
396
4,500
3,167
7. The principles of quality and value and identify potential improvements. (2c)
After conducting the application process Foxwood QPM should be made to Profit and
Loss account to calculate and evaluate the profit or loss for Foxwood. Since then, The
efficiencies of the process after making QPM .
Sales revenue
Sales down
graded
Total sales
revenue
Before
QPM
After
QPM
$
5,000,00
0
$
525,000
$
5,525,00
0
$
5,000,00
0
$
291,200
$
5,291,20
0
$
2,105,28
0
$
52,632
$
250,000
$
150,000
$
600,000
$
200,000
$
$
1,874,84
0
$
46,871
$
150,000
$
50,000
$
540,000
$
600,000
$
(1)
Cost and
Expenses
Total material Purchasing costs
Inspection & stor age of Material
A costs
Inspection & other
costs
Liabilities
Administration & distribution
expenses
Prevention programme
costs
Machine costs
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
19
Net profit
1,800,00
0
$
5,157,91
2
1,266,80
0
$
4,528,51
1
$
367,088
$
762,689
(8)
price:
Downgrade= Units of downgrade 70% of selling price
Before QPM:
Downgrade= 750 units 0,7% $1000= $525000
After QPM
Downgrade= 416 units 0,7% $1000 = $291200
(2): Costs of material purchasing= totals purchase of material A (sq. meter)
$46871
(4): Foxwood collect them in scenario
Before QPM
Inspection and other costs= $250000
After QPM
Inspection and other costs= reduction of 40% of the existing cost= (100%40%) $250000 = $150000
20
21
models, so customers can select products suitable for their and good price.
Life: Other products are expected to last for longer and to be reliable and
hence are more expensive. Foxwood's products are manufactured by metal
durable good, so the product life of Foxwood is long and the customer
In addition, Foxwood should adopt TQM. TQM is a management philosophy that seeks
to integrate all organizational functions (marketing, finance, design, engineering, production,
customer service etc) to focus on meeting customer needs and organizational objectives.
And TQM have three principles following:
Satisfy the customer: Foxwood will provide customers with products of high
quality to bring satisfaction to customers. In addition, the service will provide
more and better quality to customers . Since then, increasing customer
satisfaction and make customers feel important and valued.
22
providing guidelines and specific requirements and clear. This requires Foxwood
pay on time to get the truth.
Continuous improvement: Foxwood need to review their business processes to
improve their business processes because their opponents are always improving.
So, Foxwood need to capture the market to improve appropriate to develop and
maintain markets. Besides, Foxwood need to know to encourage and motivate
their employees to participate actively to bring improved highly effective for
Foxwood.
Value.
Besides, the Foxwood should have set the appropriate plan to maintain and develop their
values.
23
References
24