HIRARC Latest

RESULT FROM QUESTIONAIRE
Experience Group:
16- above
11-15 year
6-10 year
1-5 year
4
3
2
1
Risk = Likelihood X Impact
Rensponder
Experience Rating
Category ID
Risk Category
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
Risk
ID
Risk Factor
Shortage of equipment
16
16
16
25
16
25
16
Shortage of material
16
16
16
25
12
25
16
Late deliveries of material
12
12
16
25
16
25
16
Poor quality of workmanship
25
16
25
16
25
16
Lower work quality in presence of time constrain
20
12
16
25
16
25
16
Lack of site safety inspection and poor supervision
20
16
16
16
25
16
20
16
Construction
Experience Group:
16- above
11-15 year
6-10 year
1-5 year
4
3
2
1
Rensponder
Experience Rating
1
Category
ID
Construction
Risk
Category
Legal
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
Risk Factor
20
16
16
16
25
16
20
16
Accidents (such as collision,fireand so on)
10
16
16
25
16
16
Damage to persons or property
15
12
16
25
16
16
Changes in the work
16
16
16
16
10
Inadequateplanning
12
16
12
16
16
16
16
11
Insolvencyofsuppliers
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
10
15
16
16
16
16
Insolvency ofsubcontractors
13
Bad Weather
14
Change in law and regulation
15
Inconsistencies in government policies
16
17
18
Excessive contract variation

Change in law and regulation
Inconsistencies in governmentpolicies
6
6
6
9
9
9
9
6
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
12
9
9
4
1
1
4
4
9
9
9
4
9
9
9
19
Poor supervision
16
16
12
16
20
20
20
16
16
12
12
16
16
Compliance with Government
12
Delay in payment for claim

Cash flow difficulties
Price inflation of construction materials
financial falure bof the contractor
9
9
9
16
9
9
9
9
9
9
16
9
9
9
8
4
4
12
4
9
16
16
16
12
16
16
16
16
16
12
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
9
16
16
16
16
16
Politics and Contracts

Provision
20
21
22
23
24
25
4
R2
Risk
ID
12
R1
Finance
Bureaucratic system and long procedure for approval
Experience Group:
16- above
11-15 year
6-10 year
1-5 year
4
3
2
1
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
Exchange rate fluctuation

Monopolizing of material due closure and other
unexpected policitical condition
Lack of financial resources
Change in taxation/new tax rates
Method of construction defined in drawing and
specification is inappropriate and inapplicable to
construct
Design and drawing change
Defective design (incorrect)
Not coordinated design
Inaccurate quantities
Lack of consistancency between bill of quantities,
drawing and specification
16
12
12
16
16
16
12
16
16
16
9
9
9
4
4
4
16
12
16
16
16
16
16
9
9
9
20
20
16
16
20
20
20
20
9
9
9
9
16
9
9
9
12
8
16
6
9
9
9
9
16
16
16
16
16
9
9
9
9
9
20
20
20
20
20
12
12
12
12
12
20
16
16
20
12
36
Rush design
20
16
37
38
awarding the design to unqualified design

Change of scope
16
16
9
9
9
9
4
8
16
16
16
16
16
9
9
9
20
20
20
12
12
12
Rensponder
Experience Rating
Category ID
Risk Category
Risk
ID
Finance
26
27
28
29
Design
30
31
32
33
34
Design Risk
35
Risk Factor
16
16
12
Experience Group:
16- above
11-15 year
6-10 year
1-5 year
4
3
2
1
Rensponder
Experience Rating
Category ID
Risk Category
Environmental
Risk
ID
Logistics
Organisational
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
9
9
15
9
12
9
8
12
4
4
2
4
25
25
25
25
20
25
25
25
16
16
16
16
20
20
20
20
25
25
25
25
25
25
12
16
16
16
20
20
12
25
25
12
12
12
20
16
16
20
20
20
16
16
20
20
Risk Factor
39
40
41
42
Pollution
Ecological damage
Adverse weather conditions
Difficulty to access the site (very far)
25
16
16
16
43
Environmental factors (floods, earthquakes, etc.)
16
25
16
12
12
16
4
6
25
16
12
16
16
47
48
49
50
51
Compliance with law and regulation

Inaccurate project program
Poor communications between the home and field
offices (contractor side)
Lack of manpower on site
Undefined scope of working
Lack of skilled workers
Inexperienced staffassigned
15
9
9
44
45
20
20
16
20
25
9
9
9
9
9
12
12
9
12
16
6
6
6
9
12
16
16
16
16
9
12
12
12
12
12
12
16
16
16
16
16
16
52
Losing critical staff at crucial point of the project
25
15
53
54
55
56
Insufficient time to plan

Unanticipatedproject managerworkload
Not enough time to plan
Priorities change on existing program
25
25
20
20
9
9
12
12
9
9
9
9
8
12
8
9
9
9
9
12
12
12
12
16
16
16
16
12
16
46
8
R1
20
20
20
6
20
20
20
6
No. of respondent scoring
Risk Level
High
Medium
Low
Highest Nos. of person

in each category
High
High
High
High
High
High
Risk Level
High
Medium
Low

in each category
High
High
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
0
0
0
0
4
6
6
6
5
3
3
3
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
2
6
5
5
4
7
2
3
4
4
0
1
1
0
1
Medium
High
High
High
Medium
High
Risk Level
High
Medium
Low

in each category
Medium
3
4
1
2
5
4
3
4
3
4
5
6
5
6
4
4
4
5
4
5
0
1
0
4
5
3
Medium
High
Medium
High
0
0
0
High
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Risk Level
High
Medium
Low

in each category
6
6
7
6
2
2
2
2
1
1
0
1
High
High
High
High
7
6
3
1
2
6
1
1
0
4
4
4
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
Medium
High
High
High
High
High
5
4
4
2
4
5
5
5
0
0
0
2
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
3
5
5
5
5
5
High
High
High
High
RISK IDENTIFICATION
Classification of Risk Factors and Major Risk Categories
Risk category
Construction
Politics and Contracts

Provision
Finance
Risk code
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
19
20
22
23
24
28
30
Design
31
33
35
Environmental
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Logistics
47
48
49
Logistics
Organisational
50
51
52
and Major Risk Categories

Risk Factor
Accidents (such as collision,fireand so on)
Damage to persons or property
Inadequateplanning
Insolvencyofsuppliers
Insolvency ofsubcontractors
Bad Weather
Poor supervision
Bureaucratic system and long procedure for approval
Delay in payment for claim

Cash flow difficulties
Price inflation of construction materials
Lack of financial resources
Method of construction defined in drawing and specification
is inappropriate and inapplicable to construct
Design and drawing change
Not coordinated design
Lack of consistancency between bill of quantities, drawing
and specification
Pollution
Ecological damage
Adverse weather conditions
Difficulty to access the site (very far)
Environmental factors (floods, earthquakes, etc.)
Compliance with law and regulation
Lack of manpower on site
Undefined scope of working
Lack of skilled workers

Inexperienced staffassigned
Losing critical staff at crucial point of the project
Renspo
Experience R
Category ID
Risk Category Risk ID

1 Construction
1
2
3
4
5
Risk = Lik
Rensponder
Experience Rating
R1
R2
R3
6
6
12
25
6
6
8
8
16
16
12
9
Risk Factor

R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
16
16
6
9
16
16
16
16
25
25
25
25
16
12
16
16
25
25
25
25
16
16
16
16
Risk Level
Risk Response
Avoidance/ Mitigation/
Transfer/ Avcceptance
High
Medium
Low
Highest Nos. of
person in each
category
7
6
5
6
2
3
4
3
0
0
0
0
High
High
High
High
Risk Treatment

HIRARC Latest

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

HIRARC Latest

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

RESULT FROM QUESTIONAIRE

Late deliveries of material

Poor quality of workmanship

Lower work quality in presence of time constrain

Lack of site safety inspection and poor supervision

RESULT FROM QUESTIONAIRE

Lack of site safety inspection and poor supervision

Accidents (such as collision,fireand so on)

Damage to persons or property

Changes in the work

Change in law and regulation

Inconsistencies in government policies

Excessive contract variation

Compliance with Government

Delay in payment for claim

Politics and Contracts

Bureaucratic system and long procedure for approval

RESULT FROM QUESTIONAIRE

Exchange rate fluctuation

awarding the design to unqualified design

RESULT FROM QUESTIONAIRE

Environmental factors (floods, earthquakes, etc.)

Compliance with law and regulation

Losing critical staff at crucial point of the project

Insufficient time to plan

No. of respondent scoring

Highest Nos. of person

No. of respondent scoring

Highest Nos. of person

No. of respondent scoring

Highest Nos. of person

No. of respondent scoring

Highest Nos. of person

Politics and Contracts

and Major Risk Categories

Delay in payment for claim

Lack of skilled workers

Risk Category Risk ID

Risk = Likelihood X Impact

No. of respondent scoring

You might also like