Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Creating a highly legible board (a set of panels that can speak and present for themselves without
an oral presentation)
Understanding their skill set and strengths
Identifying what material they need and can produce within set timeframe
Extra marks for visual identity and/or a consistency in style
Marking rubric
Criteria
Guideline: Considerations when awarding points
Learning outcome # 1: Ability to visually communicate with clarity
This will be evident in:
Legibility of panels
Are the boards able to speak for themselves?
Can others identify the design concept and intention without
asking questions?
Are they easy to read, or is it a struggle to comprehend what
is going on?
Legibility of drawings/images
Are the drawings labelled?
How are the drawings sequenced? Are they arranged in a
manner that tells a story?
Methodology
Drawings must either be scanned or photocopied and reformated into the portfolio
Drawings from a photograph are not accepted
Portfolio consisting of 4 pages of A3 (please refer to the diagram & the stated format)
Placed your folio into a clear plastic folder
Your hardcopy folio will be kept by the lecturer for moderation, be sure to have your own copy for
future usage
Project title:
Checklist
Assess the following criteria by filling the boxes with the following:
X No/Weak
Average
Yes/Strong
Learning outcome # 1: Ability to visually communicate with clarity
Can the design intent be identified without any verbal presentation?
Has the student annotated, labeled and used other technical skills (lineweights, linetypes, etc.)
appropriately to produce clear and legible drawings?
Feedback/Comments:
Learning outcome # 2: Working smart
Has the student produced the necessary drawings/images/models that illustrates his/her design
process?
Does the produced work help to describe his/her project and design intentions sufficiently?
Has the student achieved quality over quantity?
Has he /she completed her work on time?
Feedback/Comments:
Learning outcome #3: Creating a cohesive and captivating package
Are the board visually captivating? Are they interesting?
Is there a strong sense of composition and consistency of language throughout all the work?
(Drawings, models and boards)
Has the student managed to create an IDENTITY to sell his final design?
Does the IDENTITY work?
Feedback/Comments: