Professional Documents
Culture Documents
motion
Ashok K. Singal
Citation: American Journal of Physics 79, 1036 (2011); doi: 10.1119/1.3620257
View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.3620257
View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapt/journal/ajp/79/10?ver=pdfcov
Published by the American Association of Physics Teachers
Articles you may be interested in
Comment on The electromagnetic momentum of static-charge distributions, by Jerrold Franklin [Am. J. Phys.
82, 869875 (2014)]
Am. J. Phys. 83, 279 (2015); 10.1119/1.4907256
The electromagnetic momentum of static charge-current distributions
Am. J. Phys. 82, 869 (2014); 10.1119/1.4879539
Noether's theorem and the work-energy theorem for a charged particle in an electromagnetic field
Am. J. Phys. 81, 186 (2013); 10.1119/1.4771881
Hidden momentum, field momentum, and electromagnetic impulse
Am. J. Phys. 77, 826 (2009); 10.1119/1.3152712
A simple derivation of the electromagnetic field of an arbitrarily moving charge
Am. J. Phys. 77, 151 (2009); 10.1119/1.3020758
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
200.37.4.44 On: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:10:23
I. INTRODUCTION
The electromagnetic fields of a moving charge are formally calculated from the LienardWiechert potentials.14
The calculation is tedious because derivatives of the potentials need to be evaluated at the retarded time. The fields for
the special case of acceleration parallel to the velocity vector
have been derived,5,6 without using LienardWiechert potentials. Huang and Lu7 considered the more general case but
found incorrect expressions for the fields. To bypass the
mathematical difficulties, Padmanabhan8 used an alternate
approach where the expressions for the field were derived
indirectly by finding a general covariant 4-vector function of
position, velocity, and acceleration of the charge, which
coincided with the field values in the instantaneous rest
frame. This approach is elegant but not immediately obvious.
It, thus, is worthwhile to obtain field expressions by a direct
transformation from the rest-frame values using a 3-vector
language in a way that is more transparent.
We will show that the textbook expressions for the fields
of an accelerated charge can be derived in straightforwardly
without using LienardWiechert potentials, thereby avoiding
the evaluation of spatial and temporal derivatives of these
potentials at the retarded time. We start with the radial Coulomb field of a stationary charge and then use the relativistic
transformations, in particular that of electromagnetic fields,
to derive the fields for an accelerated charge in its instantaneous rest frame in which transverse field components proportional to acceleration occur.
The presence of an electric field component proportional
to the acceleration was shown by Thomson,9 in pre-relativity
days by employing the concept of electric field lines representing Faraday (flux) tubes. A modern derivation using
Gausss law is available in many textbooks.1012 We shall
derive the transverse components for both electric and magnetic fields in the same spirit but from a different perspective
without explicitly using Gausss law. We then obtain
field expressions for a slowly moving charge using
1036
http://aapt.org/ajp
e 0
n;
R02
(1)
where n0 is a unit vector in the radial direction from the position of the charge.
The electromagnetic field expressions for a charge moving
with a uniform velocity v can be derived by a relativistic
transformation of the fields to a frame S, which has a uniform velocity v with respect to frame S 0 . From the Lorentz
transformation of the electromagnetic fields,13,10 we have
0
(2)
E0 Ek cE? bB;
B0 Bk cB? bE;
(3)
B B0 b E0 ;
(4)
E0 E b B;
B0 B b E:
(5)
1036
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
200.37.4.44 On: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:10:23
e
;
R2
(6)
B/
eb sin h
;
R2
(7)
charge in the instantaneous rest frame S 0 is essentially onedimensional with a0 k v0 , irrespective of the angle between a
and v in S (for Dv c). Thus in frame S 0 , the charge initially moving with a velocity v0 b0 c will have an accel0
eration a0 b_ c for a brief time interval Dt0 so that its
velocity finally becomes v0 a0 Dt0 =2. The charge will
continue to move with the uniform velocity v0 , retracing its
earlier path (see Fig. 2). For convenience, we can rotate the
co-ordinate axes in S 0 so that the charge motion (along the
O0 z01 direction) is along the horizontal axis. The frame S will
then move with velocity v along the tilted axis O0 Z0 in S 0 .
At the end, we can undo the rotation or better still, write the
field expressions in co-ordinate independent language. We shall
assume that the electromagnetic field expressions depend only
on the position, velocity, and acceleration of the charge at the
retarded time and not on any higher time derivatives of its
motion. Furthermore, we make the reasonable assumption that
the fields become zero at infinite distance from the charge.
1. The electric field of the accelerated charge in the
instantaneous rest-frame S 0
Let t0 0 be the time at which the charge was instantaneously at rest at O0 . During the time of acceleration Dt0 , the
charge travels a distance a0 Dt02 =8 toward O0 and back. To
first order in Dt0 , we can assume that during the time interval
of acceleration, the charge remains stationary at O0 . Now
consider the fields of the charge at a later time T 0 Dt0 .
With R0 > cT 0 Dt0 =2 (see Fig. 3, region II) information
that the charge motion has undergone a change could not
have reached these far off locations. Therefore, the electric
field there continues to be that of the charge moving with its
initial velocity v0 and will thus be directed in the radial
direction [see Eq. (6)] from the extrapolated position of the
charge (O02 in Fig. 3), which it would have occupied at that
moment had it not been accelerating. In nearer regions with
R0 < cT 0 Dt0 =2 (region I), the field would have adjusted
to the changed motion of the charge and is now directed radially from point O01 , the actual position of the charge at time
T0 . Only in the narrow shell of thickness DR0 cDt0 in the
region between S01 and S02 , which is causally connected to the
time interval of acceleration at O0 , are the fields yet to be
determined.
1037
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
200.37.4.44 On: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:10:23
(10)
We examine the electric field along O0 APB, a radial direction from O0 . In the absence of acceleration the field at P
would be the Coulomb field, that is, radial from O0 along
O0 P. We now want to find out what field changes
occur when the charge accelerates. As we discussed, the
electric field at A is along O01 A, which is inclined at a small
angle Dh0 with respect to O0 A. To first order in b0 ,
Dh0 O01 L=R01 O0 O01 sin h0 =R01 v0 T 0 sin h0 =R01 b0 sin h0 .
Therefore, the electric field at A can be resolved into a radial
0
component along O0 A, plus a transverse component along h^ ,
which to first order in b0 is Dh0 e=R02 eb0 sin h0 =R2 . Similarly at B there is a transverse component eb0 sin h0 =R02 . As
the shell sweeps past P, the transverse component of the
electric field there changes from eb0 sin h0 =R02 at time
T 0 Dt0 =2 to eb0 sin h0 =R02 at T 0 Dt0 =2, respectively. Independently of the duration Dt0 of the acceleration, a simple
linear interpolation implies a zero velocity-dependent transverse component at T0 , which is not surprising because at
time T0 the field point P has a causal relation to the charge at
O0 when it had a zero velocity.
In addition to the temporal change at P, 0there is also
a spatial
change 2eb0 sin h0 =R02 eb_ Dt0 sin h0 =R02
0
0
_
eb DR sin h0 =cR02 in the transverse electric field component over the distance DR0 from
A to B. The nonzero value of
0
the ratio DE0h0 =DR0 eb_ sin h0 =cR02 is independent of the
width DR0 of the shell, and in limit DR0 ! 0 we can write it
as a gradient
0
@E0h0 e b_ sin h0
:
@R0
c R02
(8)
E0h0
1038
eb_ sin h0
a:
cR0
Am. J. Phys., Vol. 79, No. 10, October 2011
(9)
e
0
n0 b_ n0 E0 :
0
cR
(11)
(12)
1038
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
200.37.4.44 On: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:10:23
: (18)
Ee
c
R2 1 b n3
R1 b n3
T 0 T v R=c2 T1 b n:
(13)
A non-relativistic Lorentz transformation does not necessarily imply a Galilean transformation. In particular,
T 0 T 1 b n, a non-Galilean feature, so that the fields
propagate with the same speed c in both reference frames.
From Eqs. (12) and (13) we obtain
0
R cT R1 b n;
(14)
n0 R0 =R0 n b=1 b n:
(15)
R
c
R0
R0
B B0 b E0 n0 b E0 ;
n E0 =1 b n;
_
en0 e n0 b n0 b
:
02
0
R
c
R
(20)
(21)
(17)
(19a)
(19b)
B n E:
or
1039
1039
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
200.37.4.44 On: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:10:23
of the charge, and n R/R and n0 R0 /R0 are the corresponding unit vectors directed from the time retarded positions toward the field point in S and S 0 respectively.
We can write n0 n0 k n0 ? with
0
(23)
(24)
b_ b_ k b_ ? ,
we
(25)
have
the
0
b_ 0 k c3 b_ k and b_ ? c2 b_ ? :
(26)
(27a)
_ (27b)
dc2 nk b_ k n? b_ ? dc2 n b:
Another vector relation that we will need is
0
b n0 b_ n0 ? b b_ b_ ? n0 b;
(34)
E?
ecd3
ec3 d3
_ b_ ? 1 n b: (35)
n? n b
n
?
R2
cR
cR
(36)
: (37)
c
R2 c2 1 n b3
R1 n b3
All quantities on the right-hand side are to be evaluated at
the retarded time. Equation (37) differs from its non-relativistic counter-part in Eq. (18) only in the extra term 1/c2 in
the velocity fields (the first term in the square brackets on the
right-hand side).
(28)
B. Magnetic field
(29)
ecn0 ? ec 0
0
0 n ? fn0 b b_ g
R02
cR
0
b_ ? 1 n0 b:
E?
B B0 k cB0 ? b E0 ;
(38a)
A. Electric field
0
Ek Ek and E? cE0 ? b B0 :
(30)
R02
e 0
0
0
nk fn0 b b_ g b_ k 1 n0 b:
0
cR
(31)
ecd3
nk b
R2
ec3 d3
_ b_ k 1 n b:
nk bn b
cR
B cdn? nk fE? b Bg n? Ek ;
cdn E n b B:
n0 ? cnk b E0 ? cn0 ? Ek :
(38c)
We substitute for Ek and E0 ? from Eq. (3) and use Eqs. (23)
and (25) to obtain
Ek
(38b)
n0 ? E0 ? cn0 ? Ek nk E0 ? b E0 ? ;
(39a)
(39b)
(40)
In the same way from Eqs. (10), (11), and (30), we have
B n E bn B:
ecn0 ? ec
0
0
E? 02 0 fn0 ? n0 b_ b_ ? g
R
cR
ec
0
0 b n0 b_ :
cR
By using Eq. (28), we can write
1040
(41)
B n E;
(42)
1040
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
200.37.4.44 On: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:10:23
a)
1041
Y.-S. Huang and K.-H. Lu, Exact expression for radiation of an accelerated
charge in classical electrodynamics, Found. Phys. 38, 151159 (2008).
8
H. Padmanabhan, A simple derivation of electromagnetic field of an arbitrarily moving charge, Am. J. Phys. 77, 151155 (2009).
9
J. J. Thomson, Electricity and Matter (Charles Scribners, New York,
1904), Chap. 3.
10
E. M. Purcell, Electricity and Magnetism, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New
York, 1985), Appendix B.
11
F. S. Crawford Jr., Waves (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968), pp. 366374.
12
W. G. V. Rosser, Classical Electromagnetism via Relativity (Butterworths,
London, 1968), Appendix 3.
13
W. Rindler, RelativitySpecial, General and Cosmological, 2nd ed.
(Oxford U.P., Oxford, 2006), Chaps. 3 and 4.
14
G. B. Rybicki and A. P. Lightman, Radiative Processes in Astrophysics
(Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2004), Chap. 4.
Ashok K. Singal
1041
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
200.37.4.44 On: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:10:23