Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10-19, 2005
Printed in Romania
DECOUPLING IN DISTILLATION
Sanda Florentina Frncu
Abstract: Due to the dynamic characteristics of the distillation process, the control design by
process decoupling is suited especially for two point composition case. The proposed decoupling
method is a theoretical-experimental procedure that can be applied as a rule to two inputs - two
outputs processes. The purpose of the paper is to present a simple and robust decoupling
procedure, and to emphasize the advantages of distillation process control by decoupling
technique. The designed decoupler has a standard general structure, which can be implemented in
4x4 distinct variants, corresponding to the dynamic characteristics of process direct and crossed
channels. It has six tuning parameters: two time constants, two deadtimes and two gains, which
can be experimentally tuned in order to obtain better decoupling performance. The decoupler is
tested on two binary distillation columns, and the simulation results show that the proposed
decoupling method is a useful tool for composition decoupling. The applied technique can also
gain recognition in other areas of chemical process control, especially when relative gain array
elements are relatively small and larger than one.
Keywords: two point composition control, decoupled multivariable process, dynamic simulations.
1. INTRODUCTION
A two-product distillation column separating
relatively ideal binary mixtures is a common
example of a multivariable system, extensively
studied in distillation literature. The study of
interactions between the control loops associated
to the distillation column emphasized the
importance of composition control loops
behavior, the interactions between inventory
control loops having less importance
[Skogestad, 1992, Shinskey, 1996]. In order to
11
(outputs) y = (x D , x B , M D , M B , p ) , where:
T
12
H 12 D11
H 22 D21
D12 G11
=
D22 0
0
G 22
(1)
H 21 D11 + H 22 D21 = 0
(2)
H 0 D11
G11 = H
11
,
H 0 D22
G22 =
H 22
(3)
where
H0 = 1
Fig. 1. Multivariable control system with decoupling
controller.
H 12 H 21
H 11 H 22
(4)
D12 =
H 11
.
H 21 D11
D21 =
H 22
(5)
13
( K p 21 , p 21 , T pt 21 ) ( K p 22 , p 22 , T pt 22 )
.
e 11s
T s +1
D = 11 21s
k 21e
T21 s + 1
k12 e 12 s
T12 s + 1
,
e 22 s
T22 s + 1
(6)
where
k12 = K p12 / K p11 , k 21 = K p 21 / K p 22
(7)
(Tt ) ij :
14
4T11 + T pt 21 = 4T21 + T pt 22
4T22 + T pt12 = 4T12 + T pt11
(8)
11 + p 21 = 21 + p 22
22 + p12 = 12 + p11
(13)
T pt 22 T pt 21 T11 = 0 , T21 = (T pt 21 T pt 22 ) / 4 ;
p 22 p 21 21 = 0 , 11 = p 22 p 21 ;
T pt 22 T pt 21 T21 = 0 , T11 = (T pt 22 T pt 21 ) / 4 ;
T pt11 T pt12 T22 = 0 , T12 = (T pt12 T pt11 ) / 4 ;
T pt11 T pt12 T12 = 0 , T22 = (T pt11 T pt12 ) / 4 .
From these implications result mainly four
variants of decoupler:
A. direct input-output channels are faster
than the crossed ones, the case of A-type
decoupler:
k12
1
T12 s + 1
;
DA =
k 21
1
T21 s + 1
(9)
k12
T s + 1
;
D B = 11
1
k
21
T22 s + 1
(10)
k12
1
DC = T11 s + 1 T12 s + 1 ;
1
k 21
(11)
k
1 .
DD =
21
T21 s + 1 T22 s + 1
(12)
p 22 p 21 11 = 0 , 21 = p 21 p 22 ;
p11 p12
22 = 0 , 12 = p12 p11 ;
p11 p12
12 = 0 , 22 = p11 p12 .
a.
11 = 22 = 0
;
p 22 < p 21
=
p 21 p 22
21
11 = p 22 p 21
p11 > p12
b.
12 = 21 = 0
;
p 22 > p 21
=
p11
p12
22
11 = p 22 p 21
p11 < p12
21 = 22 = 0
c.
;
p 22 > p 21
=
p12 p11
12
21 = p 21 p 22
p11 > p12
11 = 12 = 0
.
d.
p 22 < p 21
=
p11 p12
22
15
T21 = 0
T pt 22 > T pt 21
,
T22 = 0
4. CASE STUDIES
(14)
(15)
11 = 22 = 0
p11 < p12
p 22 < p 21
=
p 21 p 22 = 2 min
21
DC a
1
= T11 s + 1
k 21e 21s
k12 e 12 s
T12 s + 1 .
1
(17)
k 21 = K p 21 / K p 22 = 0.2 0.83
(18)
2
(T s + 1)
G (s ) = H (s )D(s ) = 2 m1
,
K pm 2 e Td 2 s
(T2m 2 s + 1)2
0
where
K p12 K p 21
0.72
K pm1 = K p11
K p 22
K p12 K p 21
K
= K p 22
0.66
pm 2
K p11
(19)
K p12 K p 21
K p11 K p 22
100 = 20.34% .
(20)
K pm12 K pm 21
K pm1 K pm 2
100 = 1.03% .
(21)
16
(22)
T = 0
T pt 22 = T pt 21 22
,
T22 = 0
(23)
17
CC ' =
K pm12 K pm 21
K pm1 K pm 2
100 = 0.007% .
(29)
11 = 22 = 0
p11 < p12
p 22 < p 21
=
p 21 p 22 = 2 min
21
D A a
1
=
k 21e 21s
k12 e 12 s
T12 s + 1 .
1
(25)
(26)
0.81
K pm1 = K p11
K p 22
K p12 K p 21
K
= K p 22
1.68
pm 2
K p11
(27)
K p12 K p 21
K p11 K p 22
100 = 32.5% .
(28)
18
19