Reflection 2: Document Analysis #3

In this document analysis, Natural and Inalienable Right to Freedom: Slaves Petition
for Freedom to the Massachusetts Legislature, I tried to focus on taking more chances in terms of
making inferences and interpreting the document. For example, I wrote that Some appeals to
pathos (emotions) are used with the loaded language of torn from the Embraces of their tender
parents; their humanity is emphasized to evoke emotions and persuade the legislature
(Document analysis #3). In terms of academic skills, I see improvements in my interpretation. I
was making an effort to focus less on the rhetoric (even though this is still there) and language
and focus more on the meaning and significance of the document. I provide an accurate reading
of the document in the context of the history. For example, I wrote that the document argues
that if slavery persists the ideals of the revolution are not realized as they condemned the British
of depriving them of their freedom as they oppose their rule and deprive the slaves of
theirs(Document analysis #3). This idea was brought up in the textbook, although I did not cite
it properly. However, sometimes I feel like I am not providing enough explanation and analysis.
My writing (diction and syntax) is effective but some my ideas are underdeveloped. Sometimes I
think something is self-evident but in reality needed to be dissected. For example I wrote An
exception would be counterintuitive without fully developing this position (Document Analysis
#3). I felt like I was aware of the authors purpose but could have been more aware of how his
ideas would have been interpreted which would have been something interesting to explore.
After rereading my assignment, I realize that I am lacking in certain areas. Even though I
used some sources such as the textbook and lecture I did not cite them. I also think that I could
have brought in the lecture more and consider other points of view. I seem to give just the

dominant and most obvious interpretation. I need to think about other possible reading as well. I
think I could have talked more about the irony or the denial of rights and been more critical. My
analysis seems too ordinary in its interpretation and needs more perspectives and a more critical
lens.
For the next assignment, I want to make sure that I integrate multiple sources including
the videos, the textbook, and the lecture. I am really going to be mindful about which document I
choose. I think my best document analysis so far was the first one because I was really interested
in the topic. I need to choose one that I could have a interesting interpretation of and one that has
some ambiguity to it. I think I will be more careful when choosing my next document. I think I
might also write the document and wait a day to revisit it with fresh eyes. I usually write and
submit it the same day. Having more thinking and processing time might allow for new ideas to
ruminate and produce a better interpretation. I need to work on my analysis skills and make sure
I consider bias and other perspectives. I also just need to work on bringing in multiple sources
and integrating them naturally. I think my interpretation needs more of a voice as well.