UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2363

JOSEPHAT MUA,
Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
BOARD
OF
EDUCATION
OF
PRINCE
GEORGES
COUNTY/PRINCE
GEORGES
COUNTY
PUBLIC
SCHOOLS;
VERJEANA
M.
JACOBS,
Individually and as Board Chairperson of Prince Georges
Public Schools; DR. WILLIAM R. HITE, JR., Individually and
as superintendent; ROGER C. THOMAS, Esquire; SYNTHIA J.
SHILLING; MONICA GOLDSON, Individually and as Associate
superintendent of Prince Georges Public Schools; PIERRE
DICKSON, Individually and as agent of the Board of
Education of Prince Georges County; DR. KEVIN MAXWELL,
Individually and as superintendent of Prince Georges
Public Schools; DR. ALVIN L. CRAWLEY, Individually and as
superintendent; ROBERT J. GASKIN, Individually and Chief
Human Resources of Prince Georges Public Schools; DR.
LILLIAN M. LOWERY; ARDRA ONEAL; ABBEY HAIRSTON,
Defendants Appellees,
and
AMERICAN
FEDERATION
OF
STATE
COUNTY
AND
MUNICIPAL
EMPLOYEES, AFSCME; ASSOCIATION OF CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES
(AFSCME), AFSCME LOCAL 2250,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:15-cv-02249-PJM)

Submitted:

June 10, 2016

Decided:

June 21, 2016

Before KING, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Josephat Mua, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:
Josephat Mua seeks to appeal the district courts order
dismissing Muas case based on Muas failure to file an amended
complaint against the American Federation of State, County, and
Municipal Employees (AFSCME) and
without

prejudice,

Defendants;

and

reconsideration.

Muas

AFSCME Local 2250; dismissing,

claims

granting,

in

against
part,

the

Muas

remaining
motion

for

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen

v.

545-46 (1949).
orders

nor

Moreover,

Beneficial

may

Appeal No. 16-1509.

of jurisdiction.
an

amended

Loan

Corp.,

337

U.S.

541,

The orders Mua seeks to appeal are neither final

appealable

Mua

Indus.

interlocutory

challenge

the

or

district

collateral
courts

orders.

orders

in

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack

We deny as moot Muas motion for leave to file

initial

brief

and

his

appeal with Appeal No. 16-1509.

motion

to

consolidate

this

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

DISMISSED