Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Barbara H. Fiese, Thomas J. Tomcho, Michael Douglas, Kimberly Josephs, Scott Poltrock, and Tim Baker, Department of
Psychology, Syracuse University.
Preparation of the manuscript was supported, in part, by grants
from the National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH51771 01)
and the William T. Grant Foundation awarded to Barbara H. Fiese.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to
Barbara H. Fiese, 430 Huntington Hall, Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244. E-mail:
bhfiese@psych.syr.edu
Historical Background
Historically, family rituals have been studied with the
intent of understanding what families do and how their daily
practices may be shattered under conditions of family stress
such as alcoholism. Bossard and Bolls (1950) catalogue of
family rituals most clearly illustrates this type of study. For
the next 25 years, rituals gained the attention of anthropologists, sociologists, and clinicians. The majority of this
381
382
FIESE ET AL.
Definitions
Whereas scientific inquiry requires clear and precise definitions of the constructs under study, researchers agree that
operationalizing routines and rituals is elusive at best (e.g.,
Table 1
Definitions of Routines and Rituals
Characteristic
Communication Instrumental
This is what needs to be done.
Commitment
Perfunctory and momentary
Little conscious thought given after
the act.
Continuity
Directly observable and detectable
by outsiders.
Behavior is repeated over time.
Selection of Studies
Beginning with the year 1950, we searched the literature
using electronic databases (PsycINFO, Medline) and the
keywords family routines, rituals, and traditions. We excluded dissertations and non-English citations from our
review. For the purposes of this review, we retained publications that focused on naturally occurring routines or rituals in community based samples. We also used the ancestral method and collected published material that was
referenced in the articles. The results of the literature search
netted 35 publications, of which 32 were included in this
review. Three publications were excluded for the following
reasons: (a) routines and rituals were identified post hoc on
the basis of qualitative inquiry (SmithBattle, 1997), (b) the
topic was limited to a description of a birthing ritual
(Pritham & Sammons, 1993), and (c) routines were studied
in the context of dissident and traditional colleges during
the 1960s (Gustav, 1971).
Descriptive Findings
Of the 32 studies reviewed, 13 provided descriptive information on the types of routines and rituals families
practiced. One of the more common routines listed was
383
384
FIESE ET AL.
385
tions (Boyce et al., 1977) and preschool children are considered generally healthier overall (Keltner, 1990). Thus,
during infancy and preschool, children are healthier, and
their behavior is better regulated when there are predictable
routines in the family. Not surprisingly, a healthy child also
makes parents feel more competent, which is also related to
regularity of routines. Because the literature base is crosssectional, we cannot make statements about the direction of
causality. It is likely that competent parents are more effective in creating family routines and that satisfying routines
provide a sense of competence. Further, the childs contribution to this transaction cannot be ignored, as children who
are easy to settle also may be more responsive to routines in
general.
386
FIESE ET AL.
Sampling
Because the focus of this study was on naturally occurring routines and rituals in community-based samples, it is
not surprising that the majority of studies we reviewed were
drawn from samples of convenience. We think that this may
be a serious issue for the study of family routines. Although
many of these studies were not representative of all families,
387
388
FIESE ET AL.
Table 2
Summary of Family Routine Practices and Ritual Representations
Routine practices
Review category
Ritual representations
Study questions
Findings
Study questions
Findings
Descriptive
Cultural
variations
Intersection of
whole family
and individual
adaptation
Do predictable routines
promote healthy
outcomes?
References
Baxter, L. A., & Clark, C. L. (1996). Perceptions of family
communication patterns and the enactment of family rituals.
Western Journal of Communication, 60, 254 268.
Bennett, L. A., Wolin, S. J., & McAvity, K. J. (1988). Family
identity, ritual, and myth: A cultural perspective on life cycle
transition. In C. J. Falicov (Ed.), Family transitions: Continuity
and change over the life cycle (pp. 211234). New York: Guilford Press.
389
390
FIESE ET AL.
Steinglass, P., Bennett, L. A., Wolin, S. J., & Reiss, D. (1987). The
alcoholic family. New York: Basic Books.
Troll, L. (1988). Rituals and reunions. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 621 631.
Turner, V. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu
ritual. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
van der Hart, O. (1983). Rituals in psychotherapy: Transitions and
continuity. New York: Irvington.
van der Hart, O., Witztum, E., & de Voogt, A. (1988). Myths and
rituals: Anthropological views and their application in strategic
family therapy. Journal of Psychotherapy & the Family, 4(3 4),
5779.
Warton, P. M., & Goodnow, J. J. (1991). The nature of responsibility: Childrens understanding of your job. Child Development, 62, 156 165.
Wolin, S. J., & Bennett, L. A. (1984). Family rituals. Family
Process, 23, 401 420.
Wolin, S. J., Bennett, L. A., Noonan, D. L., & Teitlebaum, M. A.
(1980). Disrupted family rituals: A factor in generational transmission of alcoholism. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 41, 199
214.