You are on page 1of 57

SIX SIGMA

-AN OVERVIEW

YOGESH JADHAV
ROLL NO: HPGD/OC14/0094
SPECIALIZATION: OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT

WELINGKAR INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT &


RESEARCH
YEAR OF SUBMISSION: SEPTEMBER, 2016
1/61

ABSTRACT

Six Sigma techniques are the most powerful Quality Improvement Technique so far in the world.
The process entitled Six Sigma was invented by Motorola in the 1980s and designed to target
manufacturing defects, and then reduce them to a small level (less than 3.4 defects per million
opportunities. saving millions of dollars in the process. This six sigma technique
Became very popular in Europe and many corporations revolutionized their business culture after
implementing this program. They showed drastic results on record and improved their
profitability and productivity in multiples. Understanding the six sigma method allows
organizations to better support their strategic directions, and increasing needs for coaching,
mentoring, and training. It also provides opportunities to better implement six sigma projects.
This paper examines the evolution, benefit of six sigma practices and identifies the key factors
influencing successful six sigma project implementations. It integrates the lessons learned from
successful six sigma projects and considers further improvements to the six sigma approach.
Effective six sigma principles and practices will succeed by refining the organizational culture
continuously. Cultural changes require time and commitment before they are strongly implanted
into the organization.

The Study of industries success stories of Six Sigma, reveals the importance & the need of six
sigma implementation for energy, cost & overhead savings in organizations. It is a great fact that
almost of every industrial sectors six sigma can be applied & implement. This may be the
uniqueness of the study of six sigma success stories.

2/61

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1

Introduction

05

What is Six Sigma?

06

Two perspectives of six sigma processes

10

Origin of Six Sigma

11

Six Sigma Methodology & its Benefits

12

Six Sigma Phases

16

7 Quality management tools and methods used in Six Sigma

20

Industries Success Stories Of Six Sigma

37

Six Sigma at General Electric Case Study

38

10 Six Sigma at Motorola Case Study

45

11 Six Sigma at Wipro Technologies Case Study

48

12 Six Sigma at DHL Case Study

54

13 Conclusion
14 Recommendations
15 Bibliography

59
60
61

1. Introduction
The Six sigma method is a project-driven management approach to improve the
organizations products, services, and processes by continually reducing defects in the
Organization, it is a business strategy that focuses on improving customer requirements
understanding, business systems, productivity, and financial performance.
Dating back to the mid 1980s, applications of the six sigma methods allowed many
organizations to sustain their competitive advantage by integrating their knowledge of the
process with statistics, engineering, and project management (Anbari, 2002). Numerous
3/61

books and articles provide the basic concepts and benefits of the six sigma method (Harry
and Schroeder, 2000) (Hoerl, 1998, 2001). The challenges and realities in implementing the
six sigma method successfully are immense. However, the benefits of applying the six
sigma method to technology-driven, project-driven organizations are equally great. The
objective of this study is to review and examine the evolution, benefits, and challenges of
six sigma practices and identify the key factors influencing success of its implementation.
Successful six sigma projects and their potential applications in managing traditional
projects and considers further improvements to the methodologies used for managing six
sigma projects. Wider applications of six sigma principles to the organization will succeed
through senior management involvement, organizational commitment, cultural change, and
effective project management.
Motorola claims that its people invented Six Sigma, but the principles behind the
methodology date back to 1809. That's when Carl Gauss, a German mathematician,
published "Theoria Motus Corporum Arithmeticae." In this book, Gauss introduced the
concept of the bell curve, a shape that can often represent the variation that occurs in a
controlled process.

2. What is Six Sigma?

4/61

Six Sigma is a quality management tool and strategy for process improvement

Six Sigma aim is to eliminate waste and inefficiency, thereby increasing customer
satisfaction by delivering what the customer is expecting.

Six Sigma is a highly disciplined process that helps us focus on developing and
delivering near-perfect products and services.

Six Sigma follows a structured methodology, and has defined roles for the
participants.

Six Sigma is a data driven methodology, and requires accurate data collection for the
processes being analyzed.

Six Sigma is about putting results on Financial Statements.

Six Sigma is a business-driven, multi-dimensional structured approach to:

Improving Processes

Lowering Defects

Reducing process variability

Reducing costs

Increasing customer satisfaction

Increased profits

5/61

Six Sigma Pathways

The word Sigma is a statistical term that measures how far a given process deviates from
perfection.
The central idea behind Six Sigma is that if you can measure how many "defects" you have
in a process, you can systematically figure out how to eliminate them and get as close to
"zero defects" as possible and specifically it means a failure rate of 3.4 parts per million or
99.9997% perfect. Originally, it referred to the ability of manufacturing processes to
produce a very high proportion of output within specification. Processes that operate with
"six sigma quality" over the short term are assumed to produce long-term defect levels
below 3.4 defects per million opportunities (DPMO). Six Sigma's implicit goal is to improve
all processes, but not to the 3.4 DPMO level necessarily. Organizations need to determine an
appropriate sigma level for each of their most important processes and strive to achieve
these. As a result of this goal, it is incumbent on management of the organization to
prioritize areas of improvement.
6/61

Six Sigma Applicability

Six Sigma Equation is

Where,
Y = Dependent
X = Independent

Application in various business functions

7/61

Where Six Sigma can be applied?

Six sigma can be applied in various functions of the organization, to apply this quality tool
the requisites are
There has to be a process
There has be a parameter to measure the variation in the process
There is should be opportunity in application of a six sigma as variation in the process can
be managed
There is a wide scope in the application of a six sigma

8/61

3. Two perspectives of six sigma processes


I. Statistical viewpoint
Six sigma method has two major perspectives. The origin of six sigma comes from statistics
and statisticians. Six sigma is method from a statistical, probabilistic, and quantitative point
of view. From the statistical than 3.4 defects per million opportunities or a success rate of
99.9997% where sigma is a term used to represent the variation about the process average. If
an organization is operating at three sigma levels for quality control, this is interpreted as
achieving a success rate of 93% or 66,800 defects per million opportunities. Therefore, the
six sigma method is a very rigorous quality control concept where many organizations still
performs at three sigma level.

II. Business viewpoint


In

the business world, six sigma is defined as a business strategy used to improve business

profitability, to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of all operations to meet or exceed
customers needs and expectations. The six sigma approach was first applied in
manufacturing operations and rapidly expanded to different functional areas such as
marketing,

engineering,

purchasing,

servicing,

and

administrative

support,

once

organizations realized the benefits. Particularly, the widespread applications of six sigma
were possible due to the fact that organizations were able to articulate the benefits of six
sigma presented in financial returns by linking process improvement with cost savings.

9/61

4. Origin of Six Sigma

Six Sigma is a set of tools and strategies for process improvement originally developed
by Motorola in 1985.Six Sigma became well known after Jack Welch made it a central
focus of his business strategy at General Electric in 1995, and today it is used in different
sectors of industry.

Six Sigma is a quality management tool seeks to improve the quality of process outputs
by identifying and removing the causes of defects (errors) and minimizing variability in
manufacturing and business processes.

The term Six Sigma originated from terminology associated with manufacturing,
specifically terms associated with statistical modeling of manufacturing processes. The
maturity of a manufacturing process can be described by a sigma rating indicating its
yield or the percentage of defect-free products it creates. A six sigma process is one in
which 99.99966% of the products manufactured are statistically expected to be free of
defects (3.4 defects per million), although, as discussed below, this defect level
corresponds to only a 4.5 sigma level. Motorola set a goal of "six sigma" for all of its
manufacturing operations, and this goal became a byword for the management and
engineering practices used to achieve it.

10/61

5. Six Sigma Methodology & its Benefits


Establish Roles
Six Sigma is most successful when leadership is truly committed to the philosophy and
methodology it entails. In larger companies, a Director or other high-level employee takes the
lead role in creating and guiding Six Sigma efforts. Also for large-scale efforts, Black Belts
should be trained up front as they will be responsible for leading improvement projects, and in
some cases for advising process owners on establishing appropriate metrics and procedures.
Within each operational area of an organization, the Process Owners need to be identified. These
are the individuals who will be responsible for tracking their group's processes and performance
and determining what action to take when improvement is needed. Green Belt training may also
be established so that Process Owners and other key employees have the basic understanding and
tools for working with Black Belts and managing processes.
Create a Dashboard
Once personnel are in place, the team needs to start at the highest level, by determining how it
defines the organization's success. In its simplest form, success for a for-profit entity is typically
defined using measures of profitability and shareholder satisfaction, customer satisfaction, and
employee satisfaction. For nonprofits and other organizations serving the community, the
definition will include measures of alignment with the mission, achievement of the mission and
vision, and satisfaction of donors, employees, and the community.
The dashboard is essentially a summary of the key metrics for an organization. In the early stage
it will likely consist solely of metrics related to results, but as time goes on the team will
establish input measures that strongly influence results, and those will be included as well. Many
measures can be incorporated into a dashboard, so it is the team's responsibility to clarify its own
values and ensure those values are reflected in a balanced dashboard.

Establish Performance Expectations


Now that the key metrics have been clarified, the next step is determining what level of
performance in each area is acceptable. For instance, what threshold level of customer
11/61

satisfaction does the company expect to maintain, and how much should sales increase year over
year? These performance levels can be incorporated into the dashboard in a variety of ways, for
instance by showing in green any metric that meets the performance requirement, in yellow or
orange any metric that is at risk of shifting out of spec, and in red any metric that is not at an
acceptable level.
Identify Improvement Needs
Once an area has its dashboard in place, leaders should be regularly monitoring process
performance. When performance does not reliably meet the established requirement, leaders will
need to determine whether and how to act. Typically there will be quite a few opportunities for
improvement at any given time, so decisions will be necessary regarding which hold greatest
priority. The Six Sigma leadership team should establish a standard method of prioritizing
potential improvement opportunities, and of determining what type of methodology is best for
each case.
Determine Improvement Approaches
In many cases, the reasons for inadequate performance are fairly obvious, and the solution is
equally obvious. In those cases, a Six Sigma project should not be chartered, instead the business
manager should "just do it" and address the problem. In other cases, the details of a problem are
not known, or the causes of a problem are not clear. For those situations the DMAIC process is
ideal, and chartering a DMAIC project would be the best move. In some cases, usually in
organizations further along with their Six Sigma implementation, a design project (DMADV or
DFE) can be initiated to create a new process or product or to completely re-create a process that
is fundamentally not working.

Follow Improvement Methodology


For any process improvement projects that are established, the methodology should be followed
closely. For instance for a DMAIC project, a project team is created, and the team works through

12/61

the standard DMAIC phases: Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control. Similarly, a
design project should follow the standard methodology chosen.
Once the improvement goal has been achieved, the project is closed out, and the dashboard is
updated to reflect the new performance level. Additional improvement initiatives may then be
chartered based on new findings uncovered during the original project, or based on priorities
established earlier for potential projects.
Maintain the Framework
Improvement projects have built-in steps to ensure that the gains established by each project are
maintained. At a higher level, a successful Six Sigma initiative requires continuous attention to
ensure that the established procedures, culture, and responsibilities are maintained. On an
ongoing basis, leadership should be training employees, updating the dashboard with current
performance levels and changes to key metrics, and revisiting priorities and procedures for
selecting projects. Documenting these high-level procedures will also prove beneficial as
employee turnover occurs and the individuals involved change.

Benefits of Six Sigma


A systematic approach to ascertain how good each business process is and to orient various
functions of the organizations to achieve the goal of organizational excellence consistently,
many world class organizations like Motorola, Xerox, General Electric and Allied Signal
have benefited tremendously by using Six Sigma management. These organizations
achieved superior quality, higher productivity, perfect delivery performance, overall
customer satisfaction and enterprise excellence all with lower cost. Six-Sigma is perhaps the
most successful management approach available today.

Other factors that contributes in success are

Helps organizations produce products and services better, faster and cheaper.

Remove Wastage

Maximize Customer Satisfaction


13/61

Maximize Product/Service Quality.(Develop Close to Zero Defect Products/Services)

Increase Sales

Increase overall Organizational Productivity

Save Costs

Make the Organization a Data-driven organization

Faster Cycle Time

Empower Employees

6. Six Sigma Phases

14/61

The Six Sigma includes two key methodologies: DMAIC and DMADV. DMAIC is used for
an existing process. DMADV is used when creating a new product or process. Using
DMADV for new projects usually results in a more predictable process and ultimately
higher quality product.

DMAIC
15/61

There are 5 important steps included in DMAIC. They are:

D Define goals to improve the overall process between the companys strategy and
the customers demands (can also refer to the group or individuals being supported)

M Measure the current processes. Collect relevant data on the current processes
and then use this data as a baseline for future comparisons.

A Analyze your relationship within the process. It is important to understand the


relationship to determine factors that can ensure that the companys strategy is in line
with customer demands.

I Improve the process. It is important to constantly improve and optimize the


process with analysis and other techniques. One technique that is often used is
Design of Experiments. This is a technique that uses acceptable experimental design
to help test a hypothesis.

C Control. It is important to ensure that any variances can be controlled and


corrected in order to avoid possible costly defects and loss of quality. Pilot runs are
often set up to study process capability and production transition. These pilot runs
can help fine tune or add additional control mechanisms.

DMADV
There are 5 important steps included in DMADV. They are:

D Define goals that are consistent between the business strategy and customer
demands.

M Measure CTOs (Critical To Qualities). CTOs consist of production process,


capabilities producing a product, a products capability, and any risk assessments.

A Analyze and evaluate many different designs and choose the best design for its
overall qualities.

D Design details. It is important not only to design a product, but to optimize the
design features. In order to fully optimize a design feature, it may be necessary to
create multiple designs or simulations.
16/61

V Verify the design. Important steps to verifying a design include setting up pilot
runs and running a short production. This step also requires that the design be handed
over to process owners.

Implementation of Roles in Six Sigma Methodology


There are many roles that are used in the Six Sigma Methodology. While most of the roles
below are used in many organizations Six Sigma implementation, it should be noted that
they are not universal. The roles include:
Executive Leadership Top level executives are responsible for vision and to ultimately
implement the Six Sigma Methodology. They also empower others to take initiative and
ownership of the Six Sigma principles.
Champions Champions are usually members of upper management who are responsible
for the implementation of Six Sigma throughout their organization.
Master Black Belts Champions usually hand pick them to coach others within the
organization about the Six Sigma methodologies. They allocate either all or most of their
time to the Six Sigma methodologies. It should also be noted that they usually have the
responsibility of mentoring lower roles including Black Belts and Green Belts (see below).
Experts while this role is not a part of every organization, it can play a huge role in major
engineering or manufacturing sectors. They improve overall services, products, and
processes for their customers.
Black Belts Black Belts focus on six sigma executions. They are usually middle
managers.
Green Belts Employees who help Black belts execute specific projects usually take on
these roles and other job responsibilities.
Downsides of the Six Sigma Methodology

17/61

The Six Sigma methodology has helped most organizations become competitive and reduce
costs. However, some downsides do exist.
In order to implement the Six Sigma methodology in an organization, it is extremely
important that employees on all levels buy into it. If associates, middle managers, or high
level executives are not enthusiastic about using the Six Sigma Methodology, it can
ultimately lead to failure.
Another downside of using Six Sigma is that in some instances, Six Sigmas effectiveness
has never been measured or is unable to be measured. As a result, it is unclear whether Six
Sigma is actually helpful.
Finally, many organizations use the Six Sigma methodology as a way of protecting
themselves from liability. For instance, if a company produces a product that is low in
quality or can harm its user, the organization can use the defense that quality is at the
forefront in order to be viewed positively. In this respect, it is unclear if an organization has
implemented Six Sigma for its methodology or to cover its liability

7. Quality management tools and methods used in Six Sigma


18/61

Within the individual phases of a DMAIC or DMADV project, Lean Six Sigma utilizes
many established quality-management tools that are also used outside Six Sigma. The
following table shows only some important methods used.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.

5S
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
ADOPT
Business Process Mapping
Capability Analysis
Cause & effects diagram (also known as fishbone or Ishikawa diagram)
Check sheet
Chi-squared test
Control chart
Correlation
Cost-benefit analysis
CTQ tree
Design of experiments (DOE)
Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)
General linear model
Histograms
Pareto analysis
Pareto chart
Poka Yoke (Mistake Proofing)
Process flow diagram (PFD)
Project Charter
Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
Quantitative marketing research through Enterprise Feedback Management systems
Regression analysis
Rolled throughput yield
Root cause analysis
Run charts
Scatter diagram
SIPOC analysis (Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, Customers)
Stratification
Taguchi methods
TRIZ
Why-Why analysis (5 Whys)

1. 5S
5S is the name of a workplace organization method that uses a list of
five Japanese words: seiri, seiton, seiso, seiketsu, and shitsuki. Transliterated or
translated into English, they all start with the letter "S". The list describes how to
organize a work space for efficiency and effectiveness by identifying and storing the
19/61

items used, maintaining the area and items, and sustaining the new order. The
decision-making process usually comes from a dialogue about standardization, which
builds understanding among employees of how they should do the work.

Example

2. Analysis of variance (ANOVA)


Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is a collection of statistical models used to analyze
the differences between group means and their associated procedures (such as
"variation" among and between groups)

Example

3. ADOPT
Formal

Six Sigma programs adopt a ranking terminology (similar to some martial


arts systems) to define a hierarchy (and career path) that cuts across all business
functions.
20/61

4. Business Process Mapping


Business process mapping refers to activities involved in defining what a business
entity does, who is responsible, to what standard a business process should be
completed, and how the success of a business process can be determined.

5. Capability Analysis
Way to report process capability and process performance is through the statistical
measurements of Cp, Cpk, Pp, and Ppk. This article will present definitions,
interpretations and calculations for Cpk and Ppk though the use of forum quotations.

6. Cause & effects diagram (also known as fishbone or Ishikawa diagram)


The fishbone diagram is a graphical method for finding the root causes of an effect.
The effect can be either a negative one, such as a process defect or an undue process
variation; or a positive one, such as a desired process outcome.
Example

7. Check sheet
The check sheet is a form (document) used to collect data in real time at the location
where the data are generated. The data it captures can be quantitative or qualitative.
When the information is quantitative, the check sheet is sometimes called a tally
sheet.
21/61

Example

8. Chi-squared test
A chi-squared test, also referred to as chi-square test or
test, is
any statistical hypothesis test in which the sampling distribution of the test statistic is
a chi-squared distribution when the null hypothesis is true, or any in which this
is asymptotically true, meaning that the sampling distribution (if the null hypothesis
is true) can be made to approximate a chi-squared distribution as closely as desired
by making the sample size large enough.
Example

9. Control chart
Control charts, also known as Shewhart charts (after Walter A. Shewhart) or processbehavior charts, in statistical process control are tools used to determine if a
manufacturing or business process is in a state of statistical control.
22/61

Example

10. Correlation
In statistics, dependence refers to any statistical relationship between two random
variables or two sets of data. Correlation refers to any of a broad class of statistical
relationships involving dependence.
Example

11. Cost-benefit analysis


Cost benefit analysis (CBA), sometimes called benefitcost analysis (BCA), is a
systematic process for calculating and comparing benefits and costs of a project,
decision or government policy (hereafter, "project").
23/61

Example

12. CTQ tree


A CTQ tree (critical-to-quality tree) is used to decompose broad customer
requirements into more easily quantified requirements. CTQ trees are often used in
the six sigma methodology.
Example

13. Design of experiments (DOE)


In general usage, design of experiments (DOE) or experimental design is the design
of any information-gathering exercises where variation is present, whether under the
24/61

full control of the experimenter or not. However, in statistics, these terms are usually
used for controlled experiments
Example

14. Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)


Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) was one of the first systematic techniques
for failure analysis. It was developed by reliability engineers in the 1950s to study
problems that might arise from malfunctions of military systems. A FMEA is often
the first step of a system reliability study.
Example

15. General linear model


The general linear model (GLM) is a statistical linear model. It may be written as[1]
25/61

where Y is a matrix with series of multivariate measurements, X is a matrix that


might be a design matrix, B is a matrix containing parameters that are usually to be
estimated and U is a matrix containing errors or noise. The errors are usually assumed to
follow a multivariate normal distribution. If the errors do not follow a multivariate
normal distribution, generalized linear models may be used to relax assumptions
about Y and U.
Example

16. Histograms
In statistics, a histogram is a graphical representation of the distribution of data. It is
an estimate of the probability distribution of a continuous variable and was first
introduced by Karl Pearson
Example

17. Pareto analysis


26/61

Pareto analysis is a statistical technique in decision making that is used for selection
of a limited number of tasks that produce significant overall effect. It uses the Pareto
principle the idea that by doing 20% of work, 80% of the advantage of doing the
entire job can be generated.

Example

18. Pareto chart


A Pareto chart, named after Vilfredo Pareto, is a type of chart that contains
both bars and a line graph, where individual values are represented in descending
order by bars, and the cumulative total is represented by the line.
Example

19. Poka Yoke (Mistake Proofing)


27/61

Poka-yoke [poka yoke] is a Japanese term that means "mistake-proofing". A pokayoke is any mechanism in a lean manufacturing process that helps an equipment
operator avoid (yokeru) mistakes (poka). Its purpose is to eliminate product defects
by preventing, correcting, or drawing attention to human errors as they occur.
Example

20. Process flow diagram (PFD)


A process flow diagram (PFD) is a diagram commonly used in chemical and process
engineering to indicate the general flow of plant processes and equipment. The PFD
displays the relationship between major equipment of a plant facility and does not
show minor details such as piping details and designations. Another commonly-used
term for a PFD is a flow sheet.
Example

21. Project Charter


28/61

In project management, a project charter, project definition or project statement is a


statement of the scope, objectives and participants in a project. It provides a
preliminary delineation of roles and responsibilities, outlines the project objectives,
identifies the main stakeholders, and defines the authority of the project manager. It
serves as a reference of authority for the future of the project. The terms of reference
is usually part of the project charter.
Example

22. Quality Function Deployment (QFD)


Quality function deployment (QFD) is a method to transform user demands into
design quality, to deploy the functions forming quality, and to deploy methods for
achieving the design quality into subsystems and component parts, and ultimately to
specific elements of the manufacturing process.
Example

23. Quantitative marketing research through Enterprise Feedback Management systems


29/61

Quantitative marketing research is the application of quantitative research techniques


to the field of marketing. It has roots in both the positivist view of the world, and the
modern marketing viewpoint that marketing is an interactive process in which both
the buyer and seller reach a satisfying agreement on the "four Ps" of marketing:
Product, Price, Place (location) and Promotion.

Example

24. Regression analysis


In statistics, regression analysis is a statistical technique for estimating the
relationships among variables. It includes many techniques for modeling and
analyzing several variables, when the focus is on the relationship between
a dependent variable and one or more independent variables.
Example

25. Rolled throughput yield


30/61

During manufacturing processes, it is ideal to assemble something once and pass any
tests deemed necessary on the first try. The measurement of this manufacturing ideal
is the Rolled throughput yield (RTY). Rolled throughput yield and rolled throughput
yield loss (RTYL) are methods used to calculate the probability of creating a defectfree unit during the multiple processes manufacturing (typically used in Six Sigma).
These methods are also used to calculate statistical control limits for measurement of
procedural performance.
Example

26. Root cause analysis


Root cause analysis (RCA) is a method of problem solving that tries to identify
the root causes of faults or problems that cause operating events.RCA practice tries to
solve problems by attempting to identify and correct the root causes of events, as
opposed to simply addressing their symptoms.
Example

27. Run charts


31/61

A run chart, also known as a run-sequence plot is a graph that displays observed data
in a time sequence. Often, the data displayed represent some aspect of the output or
performance of a manufacturing or other business process.
Example

28. Scatter diagram


A scatter plot or scatter graph is a type of mathematical diagram using Cartesian
coordinates to display values for two variables for a set of data. The data is displayed
as a collection of points, each having the value of one variable determining the
position on the horizontal axis and the value of the other variable determining the
position on the vertical axis.

Example

32/61

29. SIPOC analysis (Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, Customers)


In process improvement, a SIPOC (sometimes COPIS) is a tool that summarizes the
inputs and outputs of one or more processes in table form. The acronym SIPOC
stands for suppliers, inputs, process, outputs, and customers which form the columns
of the table. It was in use at least as early as the Total Quality Management programs
of the late 1980s and continues to be used today in Six Sigma and Lean.

Example

30. Stratification
Stratification is the building up of layers. Stratified is an adjective referring to the
arranging of layers, and is also the past form of the verb stratify, to separate or
become separated into layers.
Example

33/61

31. Taguchi methods


Taguchi methods are statistical methods developed by Genichi Taguchi to improve
the quality of manufactured goods, and more recently also applied to engineering,
biotechnology, marketing and advertising. Professional statisticians have welcomed
the goals and improvements brought about by Taguchi methods, particularly by
Taguchi's development of designs for studying variation, but have criticized
the inefficiency of some of Taguchi's proposals
Example

32. TRIZ
TRIZ a problem-solving, analysis and forecasting tool derived from the study of
patterns of invention in the global patent literature". It was developed by the Soviet
inventor and science fiction author Genrich Altshuller and his colleagues, beginning
in 1946. In English the name is typically rendered as "the theory of inventive
problem solving", and occasionally goes by the English acronym TIPS.
Example

34/61

33. Why-Why analysis (5 Whys)


The 5 Whys is an iterative question-asking technique used to explore the cause-andeffect relationships underlying a particular problem.[1] The primary goal of the
technique is to determine the root cause of a defect or problem. (The "5" in the name
derives from an empirical observation on the number of iterations typically required
to resolve the problem.)

Example

35/61

8. Industries Success Stories Of Six Sigma


Seeing the impact that Six Sigma is having on some leading companies sets the stage for
understanding how it can impact your business. As we relate some of these results, we will also
be reviewing the history that has brought Six Sigma to be forefront.

36/61

9. Six Sigma at General Electric Case Study

GEs tryst with Six Sigma started in 1995 when CEO Jack Welch made it a corporate goal to
be a Six Sigma company by 2000. He led from the front and ensured GE attained its Six
Sigma goals within the stipulated period. Read on to find out more about Six Sigma and GE.
General Electrics (GE) focus on quality started in the late 1980s with the launch of the
Work-Out program that opened GE culture to ideas from everyone and everywhere. The
resultant learning environment prepared the ground for Six Sigma.
Credit for the implementation of Six Sigma at GE goes to CEO Jack Welch, who made it a
corporate policy to attain Six Sigma goals by 2000. GE adopted most of its Six Sigma
concepts and methodology from pioneers such as Motorola.
Training

Six Sigma implementation at General Electric started with a heavy emphasis on


training the workforce for data-based problem analysis.

GE required all exempt employees to undertake a 13-day, 100 hour training program
in Six Sigma methodologies and complete a Six Sigma project by the end of 1998.

The training covered the DMAIC procedure:

37/61

Why GEs Six Sigma Success Story Is Still Relevant


The Six Sigma business management strategy developed by Motorola in 1986 has come to be
synonymous with quality and success. After over 20 years, why do companies continue to seek
out Six Sigma help? What does it take to have a successful Six Sigma rollout? In order to answer
these questions, this article will explore GEs experience launching Six Sigma in the mid-1990s.
Though more than 10 years have passed, the GE story remains relevant their results have been
duplicated over and over again by other companies. GE is one of the greatest success stories in
business and is still considered to be one of the best companies in the world for innovation and
financial success.
The purpose of this article is not to give all the details on how to use the tools and methodology
of the Six Sigma discipline. The focus is on sharing how powerful Six Sigma can be in driving
tangible business results and how to create a culture in which this methodology can flourish.
First, lets discuss the basic background of Six Sigma. Why do companies adopt Six Sigma? The
answer is simple to make money. Poor quality and a failure to focus on customers ultimately
cost organizations a lot of cash. The fundamental goal of the Six Sigma methodology is to drive
a measurement-based approach that focuses on process improvement and variation reduction
with the goal of improving financial results and meeting customer needs. Note the emphasis on
measurement-based. Companies should only measure what they value quality, customer
satisfaction, and productivity.
GE was able to internalize this truth, to the benefit of the entire organization. Jack Welch, the
former CEO of GE, explains that only when GEs Six Sigma efforts started focusing on
external customers did they start to see the value of Six Sigma. In Jacks book, Jack, Straight
from the Gut, he writes that in the 1990s GE pursued four major initiatives: globalization,
services, Six Sigma, and e-business. He said that the decision to implement Six Sigma sprang
out of an employee survey in 1995 that uncovered that employees felt GEs quality was okay,
but it could be a lot better.
When looking at tools and methodologies to address the quality issues, Jack commented that
the earlier quality programs they attempted were too heavy on slogans and light on resultsor
were too theoretical. However, his investigation into Six Sigma convinced him to make this one
of his top four multiyear priorities. Lets take a look at some of the key aspects of Jacks
approach when launching the Six Sigma program:
38/61

Leaders of every business unit championed Six Sigma, so the project was sponsored from the
top.
Six Sigma projects were reviewed quarterly at the executive level, providing visibility to
leadership on what was important.
GEs top talent was assigned to lead every initiative, even taking them out of their jobs to
become Black Belts.
Rewards and recognition went to the Six Sigma community because they were the best, driving
home the message of how important this methodology was to the organization.
Extensive, multi-month training was provided for the leaders of the initiatives.
Training on concepts and tools to solve problems in everyday work was provided to thousands
of Green Belts, in the famous workout sessions you may have read about.
Every project had to tie into the business objectives and the bottom line of GE, directly
contributing to the companys success.
To give you an idea of how serious GE was about Six Sigma, in the first year of the
implementation they changed the bonus structure to 60 percent financial success and 40 percent
Six Sigma success. In addition, by 1998 no one was considered for a management job unless
they had at least the Green Belt training. They also screened management-level new hires based
on Six Sigma qualifications and commitment to the methodology.
So you might be wondering how big of an impact did this have? Jack attributes the Six Sigma
implementation to driving more than $10 billion dollars of benefits at GE and also drove up
operating margins from 14.8 percent to 18.9 percent in four years. Here are some specific
examples of success at GE:
In GE Capital, over 24 percent of incoming calls in the mortgage division were going to
voicemail. A Six Sigma team found that one branch had a near perfect percentage of answered
calls. After the team analyzed its system, process flows, equipment, physical layout, and
staffing, this branch model was duplicated everywhere and the company met customer calls with
a live GE person on the first try 99.9 percent of the time.
In GE Plastics, they were shut out of bidding on contracts to provide Sony CD-ROMs due to
quality issues. A black belt ran the process though the Six Sigma methodology, and implemented
a change in the production process. They went from 3.8 Sigma to 5.7 Sigma and won the Sony
contract.
39/61

3.8 Sigma = 12,000 defects per million opportunities or a 1.2 percent probability of failure
5.7 Sigma = 10 defects per million opportunities or a .00001% probability of failure
One business unit found that by using Six Sigma it could increase the capacity of their factories
and thus avoid incurring the investment to add capacity by adding factories.
In the Power Systems division, they were incurring forced outages in newly-designed gas
turbine power plants. The problem was that rotors were breaking, resulting in 37 units that had
to be removed and replaced. After the Six Sigma team examined the process, no units had to be
removed from an install base of about 210 units, and GE was considered to then have a lead in
the technology. This fix occurred just before the market for power units exploded, and as a
result, GE was able to claim a major share of the global market for new power plants just as the
demand was just taking off.
In the Medical Systems business, the first Six Sigma-designed product was a new CT Scanner
called the Light Speed that reduced the time it took to do a chest scan from three minutes to 17
seconds. The other win was that the machine could be taken out of a box and used immediately.
Jack said that in 2001 51 percent of the Medical Systems revenue was from Six Sigma designs,
and at the time of writing his book, 100 percent of the Medical System products came from Six
Sigma.
The examples above hopefully give you a perspective of the power of Six Sigma and why it is
still alive at GE today. Not all companies launched Six Sigma programs the same way as GE,
and many of them have had great results while others have had less impressive outcomes. It is
clear that significant focus on the culture that Jack Welch put in place made a significant
difference for employee careers and shareholder value.
As Jack Welch says, The big myth is that Six Sigma is about quality control and statistics. It is
that but its a helluva lot more. Ultimately, it drives leadership to be better by providing tools to
think through tough issues. At Six Sigmas core is an idea that can turn a company inside out,
focusing the organization outward on the customer.

40/61

10. Six Sigma at Motorola Case Study

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 21 February 2008 Motorola, Inc. (NYSE: MOT) today announced
that more than 400 delegates comprising senior Motorola leaders and customers gathered to
share industries' practices and experiences at the inaugural Motorola Six Sigma Conference Asia
Pacific2008.
Organized by Motorola University Asia Pacific, the two-day conference took place at Kuala
Lumpur Convention Centre and was officiated by the honorary Datuk Seri Dr. Jamaludin Jarjis,
Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology

Focusing mainly on existing and potential Motorola customers, this exclusive event provided a
conducive learning experience and interactive platform for Six Sigma practitioners to present
their views and successes in implementing the world-renowned business process improvements
and defect-reducing methodologies.

The impressive response to the conference clearly reflects Six Sigmas effectiveness and
continued successful applications in the Asia Pacific region, said Kamaldin bin Nordin, Director
of Motorola University Asia Pacific and Malaysia HR Country Director. Peer education remains
one of the most effective methods of learning. Hence, it made perfect sense to provide an avenue
for

the

Six

Sigma

community

to

exchange

expertise

and

experiences.

The conference focused on four key areas: Six Sigma Strategy and Leadership Alignment,
41/61

Innovation through Design for Six Sigma, Leading Six Sigma with Lean Thinking and Six
Sigma Achievement in Services. The uniqueness of this conference was the sharing of the
showcases by the actual practitioners from various organizations.

Delegates benefited in discovering how to enhance their respective businesses by learning to


align their business strategies and goals, incorporate new methodologies into their innovations
and applying Lean Six Sigma principles. In addition, the conference helped delegates to better
understand customer expectations and requirements by employing the Six Sigma concepts and
tools that offer the most impact to the services industry.

One such session showed delegates how the application of Design for Six Sigma concept, using
the DMADV (Define, Measure, Analyse, Design, Verify) methodology, can help to build good
leadership strategies that focused on a strong innovation culture, leading to long-term growth and
sustainability.
The DMADV methodology is not commonly known or practiced in the industry, but it
encourages breakthrough innovation which is an effective way to create a new product or a new
process

design.

Leading Six Sigma with Lean Thinking is a great example of how delegates can apply Motorola
Universitys Lean Six Sigma principles and tools in conjunction with the Six Sigma rigor and
methodology to achieve rapid and significant improvements with greater speed and reduced
process variation and wastage. Delegates also learnt how to play their roles and effectively
manage, support and motivate their teams, and apply project management skills to achieve
desired goals. In addition, delegates learnt how Six Sigma can be successfully applied to the
service industries.
A host of 18 speakers from six countries - Malaysia, Singapore, India, China, Taiwan and USA
led the sessions, which comprised 12 case studies by organizations spanning practices from six
industries: electronics, telecommunications, information technology, banking, manufacturing and
Plantation.

42/61

Kamaldin stated that although Six Sigma was originally designed to reduce defects in
manufacturing processes, the methodologies have evolved over time and have proven to be
applicable and effective beyond manufacturing industries.

In order to improve service quality, focus on service processes is necessary. Six Sigma is a
philosophy which concentrates on the improvement of process and if properly applied is highly
applicable to a wider range of services. The wider applicability of Six Sigma depends on the
identification of key performance indicators (KPIs) for different types of service processes, he
said. The presence of some of our customers from the services sector, including that of Call
Center and IT industries further testify to the evolution of Six Sigma; how it has transformed
from a process-defect reduction exercise into a strategic management program across multiple
industry practices, headded.

Conceptualized in 1986, the program has since been adopted by thousands of companies
worldwide. Six Sigma projects boast a Return on Investment (ROI) ratio between 1:10 and 1:50
and have resulted in a total savings of about USD$17 billion for Motorola Inc.
Created by Motorola, Six Sigma is one of the worlds leading business process improvement
initiative, offering tools and techniques to improve efficiency, maximizing human capital, and
empowering leadership through its Six Sigma Black and Green Belt programs.
Motorola is a globally recognized leader in corporate education and is the creator of Six Sigma.
As the learning arm of Motorola, it supports the companys continued development and
breakthroughs in marketing, supply chain management and engineering by training people and
optimizing quality. The university offers a compelling spectrum of professional training and
education programs in different areas of management.

43/61

11. Six Sigma at Wipro Technologies Case Study

Wipro Technologies is a global services provider delivering technology-driven business


solutions that meet the strategic objectives of clients. Wipro has 40+ Centers of Excellence
that create solutions around specific needs of industries. Wipro delivers unmatched business
value to customers through a combination of process excellence, quality frameworks and
service delivery innovation. Wipro is the World's first CMMi Level 5 certified software
services company and the first outside USA to receive the IEEE Software Process Award.
Wipro has one of the most mature Six Sigma programs in the industry ensuring that 91% of
the projects are completed on schedule, much above the industry average of 55%. Six Sigma
provides the tools for continuous improvement on existing processes thereby helping sustain
the SEI-CMM Level 5 and CMMi certifications. This case focuses on the initiatives taken
by Wipro Technologies to implement the Six Sigma Quality tool to achieve sustained
strategic business results. It explores the implementation procedure at Wipro Technologies
and the benefits reaped by the company on account of adopting Six Sigma.
The case also throws light on the recent developments in the Six Sigma concept including
Wipros Six Sigma Skill base and consulting experience and explains how the company
intends to build its expertise and experience to bring continuous process improvement to
the organization.

44/61

Backdrop
Wipro Limited was established in 1945 and commenced its operations in 1946 as a
vegetable oil company. In the early 1980s, Wipro diversified into the Information
Technology sector with Liberalization hitting India in the 1980s. This has been a fascinating
transformation from a vegetable oil company into a global IT services giant.
Today, Wipro Technologies has become a global service provider delivering technology
driven business solutions that meet the strategic objectives of clients. Wipro has 40+
Centers of Excellence that create solutions related to specific needs of Industries. Wipro
can boast of delivering unmatched business value to customers through a combination of
process excellence quality frameworks and service delivery innovation.
A strong emphasis upon building a professional work environment, leaders from within, and
having a global outlook for business and growth have led to innovation of people processes
on a continued basis. Over the years, Wipro has significantly strengthened its competency
based people processes and demonstrated innovative practices in talent acquisition,
deployment, and development, based on strategic needs.
A leading provider of communication networks in the US required improvement in the
product performance of a telecom application using Six Sigma methodologies. Thus, with
the growing importance on aligning business operations with customer needs and driving
continuous improvement, Wipro began moving towards focusing on Quality, thereby,
Creating a learning environment that led to implementation of Six Sigma.
Integrating Six Sigma concepts was also intended to bring rigor in effective upstream
processes of the software development life cycle. Implementation of Six Sigma
methodologies brought in quantitative understanding, cost savings, and performance
improvement towards product quality.
Some of the key challenges involved were:

Reduce the data transfer time

Reduce the risk

Avoid interruption due to LAN/WAN downtime

Parallel availability of the switch for the other administrative tasks during the same
period

45/61

Evolution of Six Sigma at Wipro


Wipro is the first Indian company to adopt Six Sigma. Today, Wipro has one of the most
mature Six Sigma programs in the industry ensuring that 91% of the projects are completed
on schedule, mush above the industry average of 55%.
As the pioneers of Six Sigma in India, Wipro has already put around ten years into process
improvement through Six Sigma. Along the way, it has scaled Six Sigma ladder, while
helping to roll out over 1000 projects. The Six Sigma program spreads right across verticals
and impacts multiple areas such as project management, market development and resource
utilization.
Six Sigma at Wipro simply means a measure of quality that strives for near perfection. It is
an umbrella initiative covering all business units and divisions so that it could transform
itself in a world class organization. At Wipro, it means:
(i) Have products and services meet global benchmarks
(ii) Ensure robust processes within the organization
(iii) Consistently meet and exceed customer expectations
(iv) Quality a culture within
Difficulties encountered by Wipro and learning from them
Build the Culture:
Implementation of Six Sigma required support from the higher level managers. It meant
restructuring of the organization to provide the infrastructure, training and the confidence in
the process. Wipro had to build this culture and that took time in implementation.
Project selection:
The first year of deployment was extremely difficult for Six Sigma success. They decided to
select the project on the basis of high probability of their success and targeted to complete
them in a short period to assess the success. These projects were treated as pilot projects
with a focus to learn. For the selection of the right project the field data was collected,
process map was developed and the importance of the project was judged from the eyes of
customers.

46/61

Training: After the set up, the first step of implementation was to build a team of
professionals and train them for various stages of Six sigma. The training was spread in five
phases: Defining, measuring, analyzing, improving and controlling the process and lastly
increasing customer satisfaction. These phases consisted of statistics, bench marking and
design of experiments. To find the right kind of people and train them was a difficult job.
This motivated Wipro to start their own consultancy to train the people.

Resources:
It was difficult to identify resources that required for short-term basis and long-term basis as
it varied from project to project. Wipro did it on the basis of seriousness and importance of
the project.
Project Reviews:
As timely reviews play a very crucial role to judge the success of a project. Wipro had to
develop a team of experts for this purpose. The task assigned was to see the timeliness, find
out gap, week areas and to check the outcome as per the plan.
Implementation of Six Sigma at Wipro
Wipro has adopted the project approach for Six Sigma, where projects are identified on the
basis of the problem areas under each of the critical Business Processes that adversely
impacts the business significantly.
Wipro has evolved following Six Sigma methodologies (Exhibit 2):
(I) For developing new processes:
(i) DSSS+ Methodology Wipro employs DSSS methodology for software
development. The methodology uses rigorous in-process metrics and cause analysis
throughout the software development lifecycle for defect free deliveries and lower customer
cost of application development.
(ii) DSSP Methodology used for designing new processes and products

47/61

(iii) DCAM Methodology used for designing for customer satisfaction and
manufacturability
(II) For Improving Existing Processes:
(i) TQSS Methodology used for defect reduction in Transactional processes.
(ii) DMAIC Methodology -used for process improvement in Non-transactional
process.

(III) For Reengineering:


CFPM Methodology - used for cross functional Process mapping.
The list of players at Wipro is as below:

Executive Management

Six Sigma Champions and Deployment Leaders

Financial Executives

Black Belts

Green Belts

Yellow Belts

Six Sigma projects at Wipro are (Exhibit 3):


(i) Driven by business heads, also called Champions for the projects.
(ii) Led by Green Belts (GB)
Assisted by Black Belts (BB)
The Management of the project at Wipro follows the following tools for implementation
Of Six Sigma:

Ideation

Definition

Selection

Tracking

Reporting

48/61

Currently 15000+ employees are trained in Six Sigma methodologies. Wipro has also built
up a Six Sigma skill base of over 180 certified black belts while helping to roll out over a
1000 projects.
Future Focus and Challenges:
Six Sigma certainly produces breakthrough improvement. But to achieve this Wipro will
have to combine the power of the Six Sigma method and tools with stretch goals, goals that
almost seem too aggressive, too optimistic.. Also Wipro will have to benchmark itself
against the competition on the level of performance achieved by rivals.. This focus will lead
to the adaptation of newer dimensions of the quality management framework towards
embodying a totality of process, people, product, and technology for achieving high process
capability.
Six Sigma projects require continuous change. Black Belts and Green belts develop
improvements to systems and processes for which they are not accountable. And when these
participants are done with their project, they ask the real system or process owner to
implement and sustain their solution and hence the challenge before Wipro lies in bringing
the commitment towards continuing its process optimization theory.
The Challenge will be to transform Six Sigma from a tool for improving product quality to
an overall business improvement methodology. The companys aim will be at having 100%
of its management trained in Six Sigma. To summarize, the quality system will continue to
be based on incremental optimization, with rigorous implementation and sustenance of the
same. The goal will be to make quality as the No.1 objective for all employees.

49/61

12. Six Sigma at DHL Case Study

DHL taps people power

Company acquisitions, as well as the objective of cementing its position as market leader,
led Deutsche Post DHL to implement a fresh approach to dealing with customers within its
various global divisions.
Prior to Deutsche Post acquiring a majority interest in DHL in 2002, the German logistics
group had purchased Swiss logistics provider Danzas and AEI (Air Express International) in
1999. The acquisition of British logistics company Exel in 2005 added another culture into
the group.
In 2007 Deutsche Post DHL launched a new program First Choice to promote customer
loyalty by making the logistics group the first choice of current and potential customers. A
fresh approach meant adopting a new philosophy through the employee ranks of Deutsche
Post DHL.
The organisation is of firm belief that keeping employees busy equates to a stable workforce
inactivity breeds boredom and workers will look for greener pastures. In addition, an
integral component of the First Choice program is the empowerment of employees.
Every employee has a voice as much as every customer has a voice, says DHL Global
Forwardings Chief Executive Officer, South Asia Pacific, Amadou Diallo.
We listen to the voice of our customers but we listen as well to our employees and try to
get our staff as motivated as possible in order for them to resolve all potential issues that we
can have while processing goods.
That keeps our staff motivated because they have less damages, they have less complaints,
50/61

and the service level they deliver is higher and then we can grow our business.
Heading up the First Choice program in the Asia Pacific region is New Zealand-born
Jonathon OLeary, who has the lengthy title of Senior Director, First Choice and
Performance Improvement Management. OLeary has been with DHL for more than 12
years, moving from New Zealand to Dubai and Australia before basing himself in Singapore
in 2002.
We went through a large period of acquisition, from 97 right through to 2007. So with all
these acquisitions youve got a lot of processes that are cross-fertilised from different
companies and different systems, OLeary explains.
We knew work needed to be done to improve our processes.
Despite only beginning the first staggered rollouts of First Choice in early 2007, OLeary
believes the group has made exceptional progress from a push to a pull culture.
The culture change and the real change management is still ongoing, he says. Some
people are now really pulling. Theyre saying, Ive got this problem, come on, lets do it,
lets get together and work on it.
Some we still need to push a little bit and say, hey, youve got these issues here, were
coming in and were going to use this method and were going to help. So were kind of in
the halfway along the change.
An important factor of First Choice is utilising the experience of the employees in their
individual roles. OLearys team of regional senior advisors travel to all parts of the Asia
Pacific region, interacting with and training workers to the new program. For OLeary. the
scenario is refreshing, especially as he has witnessed life from both sides of the fence.
I used to work in a warehouse and we were the guys at the bottom of the line getting yelled
at get that freight out the door, he recalls.
Now, no longer is a forklift driver just a forklift driver; hes somebody helping to do our
process better. They know their job and they know what theyre doing. Thats the exciting
bit.
Its probably the thing Ive taken most out of these three years is seeing the engagement in
these initiatives.
THE SIX SIGMA MANDATE
The First Choice approach comes via the Six Sigma DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyse,
Improve, Control) methodology and the Lean process. While DMAIC arrived at DHL from
technology companies such as GE and Motorola, Lean has its origins in manufacturing.
We started off with support from external consultants and a lot of these external consultants
51/61

came from GE and Motorola, so its kind of the link we have with them, OLeary says.
There are also some key people within our organisation that we have from GE and
Motorola as well.
Motorola is also one of the customers who have responded to DHLs customer satisfaction
survey.
Were very open about the initiatives were working on, OLeary says. If they say weve
got a documentation accuracy issue, say from Shanghai to Brazil, well work on initiatives
and well share them with all our documentation because theyre on the same mindset.
Theyre thinking along the same process lines.
Thanks to customer feedback, knowing there is an invoicing problem is the easy part.
Identifying what area of invoicing has the problem is, OLeary says, probably one of the
biggest learnings they have had during the past three years.
Initially we tried to save the world in our first wave of initiatives, and now as our internal
senior advisors, or [Six Sigma] black belts, have got up to speed were a lot better and
scoping down and focussing on a size that we can really fix with the resources that weve
allocated to do that.
Then we have the key initiatives themselves, and I think the key point here is that frontline
staff have been involved again. We want to empower people on the ground to help fix their
own problems, we dont want them to come to work and we have to pop down and tell them
what to do.
These guys know their processes, they know what theyre doing back to back, and were
really empowering them by helping them, by saying, we want your advice on how to fix
this, youre the guys doing it, lets all work together to fix it. So theyre involved, and
theyre important on the initiative side.
OLeary says Australia, in particular has been quick to embrace First Choice methodology,
especially in complaint handling and streamlining invoicing processes.
Were doing a lot of customer focus initiatives in Australia and implementations are
improving our service quality through the implementation of initiatives that weve done, he
says.
For some specific customers, our clearance documentation has been reduced by three or
four days in Sydney; weve done initiatives on invoicing timelines in Sydney and
Melbourne, and in Brisbane we did an initiative for ocean freight.
OLeary says the layout of DHLs new Melbourne facility (see box item) is an ideal example
of improving efficiencies, right down to employee seating arrangements.
The whole layout of that facility is using one of the First Choice tools. Spaghetti diagrams
show where a document comes in, where it goes to, where people need to sit, and how close
52/61

they are to printers, he says.


AUSTRALIAN INITIATIVE
According to Amadou Diallo, roughly 85 percent of DHL employees in the Asia Pacific
region have undergone First Choice training. He reiterates that Australia in particular has
been at the forefront of culture change, pointing to Phil Dean Sub Regional Advisor at
DHL Global Forwarding in Melbourne as the organisations first Six Sigma black belt.
We have had a lot of black belts in the meantime across the globe, but he was the first in
our organization, Diallo says.
In most of the innovative ideas within the organisation, Australia usually runs faster. And
they have been helping the DHL organisation in broadening the tools and services and
putting it as a DNA of all the employees world wide.
Another Australian, Brad Harris, is the General Manager of the DHL Singapore hub, the
largest air express hub in Change Airport. Not far away is DHLs Healthcare and Life
Sciences Hub, which delivers end-to-end supply chain management solutions to companies
in the pharmaceutical, hospital and medical equipment sectors.
Diablo, originally from Senegal but now based in Singapore, is also DHL Global
Forwardings Chief Executive Officer for Angola, as well as being globally responsible for
DHLs Fashion and Apparel Centers. He says its not uncommon for DHL executives to
have multiple functions.
We believe people should utilize their resources where they add value to the company and
not just be locked into geography, he says.
He points to Sam Nag, Chief Executive Officer for South East Asia, who is also regionally
responsible for DHLs energy sector across Asia from China down to Papua New Guinea.
The new DHL Asia Pacific Oil and Energy Centre of Excellence, located in Change South,
is the largest such centre in the group.
Hermann Due, CEO of DHL Global Forwarding Freight, says the growing global demand
for energy, and the exploration of alternative energy sources, presents key opportunities for
logistics companies.
DHL is well-positioned to develop new approaches and set new benchmarks in the
industry, Due says.
With Asia as the centre point, DHL is basing its growth across the board on fundamental
trends towards the three triangles of trade. One triangle links the Middle East and Africa
to Asia, another from Latin America to Asia, and lastly within the Asia region itself which
also includes Australia. Notably North America and Europe, already boasting a sizeable
DHL presence, are not in loop for major expansion.
53/61

To service the Latin American market we have set up a hub in Australia where we
concentrate all the goods coming from Asia on an air freight service to get into the Latin
American market, Diablo says.
This gives us an alternative to flying over Los Angeles or flying across destinations in
Europe, because it is a much faster route.
Australia did not go through a recession and we have been capable of doing our business in
a double digit manner.
Despite DHLs US origins and Deutsche Post DHL being headquartered in Germany, the
organizations various global centers have very much a local identity.
I do not feel like I am working in a German company, Diablo says. In Asia I feel like Im
working in an Asian company and the same for the people in Africa, they feel like theyre
working in an African company.
So if you go in Australia, our people in Australia working in DHL dont feel like theyre
working in an American organization or a German organization. Its pretty much an
Australian organization.

54/61

13. Conclusion

Successful implementation and growing organizational interest in six sigma method


have been exploding in the last few years. It is rapidly becoming a major driving
force for many technology-driven, project-driven organizations.

Factors influencing successful six sigma projects include management involvement


and organizational commitment, project management and control skills, cultural
change, and continuous training.

Understanding the key features, obstacles, and shortcomings of six sigma provides
opportunities to practitioners for better implement six sigma projects.

Six sigma allows them to better support their organizations strategic direction, and
increasing needs for coaching, mentoring, and training.

The statistical aspects of six sigma must complement business perspectives and
challenges to the organization to implement six sigma projects successfully.

Integrating the data-driven, structured six sigma processes into organizations still has
room for improvement.

Cultural changes require time and commitment before they are strongly implanted
into the organization.

Effective six sigma principles and practices are more likely to succeed by refining the
organizational culture continuously.

55/61

14. Recommendations

Six Sigma is a quality tool developed & designed for the improvement & acceleration in
the manufacturing or the administrative section of the organization.

Six Sigma can be implemented and integrated with the existing improvement approach,
Total Process Management, TPMG or others.

Six Sigma is customer-focused, data-driven philosophy which can be applied in various


functions of the department.

Six Sigma can be used to attack the most complex problems, while TPMG handles the
many day-to-day issues.

Six Sigma will provide a structure (DMAIC) and training in tools, thereby ensuring that
the tools are used at the right time and in the right way.

Every organization must adopt the Six Sigma methodology in order to achieve their goals
& obtain the maximum of benefit from the available resources.

Identify processes/methodologies used to support innovation and other activities; Use six
sigma to improve such processes
Innovation Maturity Model
Next generation organizational behaviors

Instead of applying Six Sigma in silos, use it for the processes of the entire organization

56/61

15. Bibliography

Wilson G. (2005). Six Sigma and the product development cycle.

Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann.

Martin J.W. (2008). Operational excellence: using lean six sigma to translate
customer value through global supply chains. Auerbach Publications.

Cox I. et al. (2010). Visual six sigma: making data analysis lean. John Wiley &
Sons.

Internet/Websites Google, Wikipedia & others sources

Schonberger R.J. (2008). Best practices in lean six sigma process improvement: a
deeper look. John Wiley & Sons.

Martin J.W. (2007). Lean six sigma for supply chain management: the 10-step
solution process. McGraw-Hill.

Lunau S. et al. (2008). Six sigma + lean toolset: executing improvement projects
successfully. Springer.

Burton T.T. and Sams J. (2005). Six sigma for small and mid-sized organizations:
success through scalable deployment. Ed. J. Ross.

El-Haik B. and Al-Aomar R. (2006). Simulation-based lean Six-Sigma and design


for Six-Sigma. John Wiley & Sons.

Eckes, George. (2001) The Six Sigma Revolution: How General Electric and Others
Turned Process into Profits. p.5. New York, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Pande, P.S., Neuman, R.P., & Cavanagh, R.R. (2000). The Six Sigma Way: How GE,
Motorola and other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance. New York, New
York: McGraw Hil

57/61

You might also like