Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME711
1/7
9/4/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME711
* THIRD DIVISION.
[1] Records, pp. 23 120.
565
565
2/7
9/4/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME711
566
566
3/7
9/4/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME711
567
567
4/7
9/4/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME711
and extent of his title and an adequate description of the real estate of
which partition is demanded and joining as defendants all other
persons interested in the property.
568
568
5/7
9/4/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME711
[17]Catapusan v. Court of Appeals, 332 Phil. 586, 590 264 SCRA 534,
537 (1996) Ocampo v. Ocampo, 471 Phil. 519, 533534 427 SCRA 545,
555 (2004).
[18] Supra note 5.
569
569
6/7
9/4/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME711
SO ORDERED.
Velasco, Jr. (Chairperson), Peralta, Mendoza and
Leonen, JJ., concur.
570
570
Petition granted.
Note.Multiple appeals are allowed in special
proceedings, in actions for partition of property with
accounting, in the special civil actions of eminent domain
and foreclosure of mortgage The rationale behind allowing
more than one appeal in the same case is to enable the rest
of the case to proceed in the event that a separate and
distinct issue is resolved by the court and held to be final.
(Rovira vs. Heirs of Jose C. Deleste, 616 SCRA 573 [2010])
o0o
Copyright2015CentralBookSupply,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000014f96ec30ce54b0657a000a0094004f00ee/p/ANP698/?username=Guest
7/7