Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Qualitative,
Quantitative,
or Mixed
Method
Qualitative
Research
Question(s)/
Hypothesis
#1 Clarify which
themes and elements
constitute
professionalism in
medicine.
#2 The concept of
professionalism is
surrounded by
ambiguity and that a
generally accepted
definition is lacking.
#1 Does a personal
illness experience
improve professional
attitudes such as
empathy and care of
patients?
#2 Enabling doctors to
Theoretical
Framework
Measures/
Instruments
A conventional
wisdom that
professionalism
is passively
caught:
students are
expected to
emulate the
values and
behaviors
modeled by their
teachers and
senior clinicians.
1. Three phases
design: A
systematic
search of
literature, an
analysis of the
elements found,
and validating
their results with
an expert panel.
2. Constant
comparison
technique
(Maycut,
Morehouse,
1994).
An expert
panel to
validate their
results.
The Theory of
the Moral
Sentiments.
1.A
questionnaire
adapted from
Andrews &
Wilding, 2004.
2. Hospital
Anxiety and
Depression Scale
Newlyqualified UK
doctors (n2062/4784)
and two
cohorts of
students at
one London
medical
Participants
Summary of Findings/
Results
performance. BMC
Medical Education, 1-8.
reflect on their
personal experiences
may increase their
positive effects.
Mixed method
Qualitative
#1 Will empathy
targeted training
promotes empathy in
medical students?
#2 Medical students
personal orientation
toward empathy
declines in medical
school.
#1 Focused
educational
interventions will be
successful at fostering
undergraduate medical
student empathy?
#2 All dimensions of
empathy of clinical
empathy may be
(HADS).
school
(n=640/749).
Also for the
qualitative, 37
consultant, 1
specialist
registrar, 2
clinical skills
tutors, and 25
newlyqualified
doctors.
Jefferson Scale
125 year 3
of Physician
medical
Empathy (JSPE). students (64
men, 61
women).
Statistically significant
declines were observed in
5 items and the total
scores of the JSPE
between the 2 test
administrations.
Empathy in the
medical setting
is appreciation
of the patients
emotions and
expression of
that awareness to
the patient.
Search PubMed
for studies that
address the
effectiveness of
strategies for
teaching
empathy to
medical students.
No participant
since the
study was
based on
qualitative and
quantitative
studies that
the
researchers
found.
Qualitative
#1 Does empathy
decrease after clinical
training in medical
school?
#2 Clinical training
may have an adverse
effect on medical
resident and student
empathy.
participants.
References:
Andrews, B., and Wilding, J. (2004). The relation of depression and anxiety to life-stress and
achievement in students. Bri J Psychol, 95(4), 509-552.
Chen, D., Lew, R., Hershman, W., and Orlander, M. (2007). A cross-sectional measurement of
medical student empathy. J Gen Intern Med, 434-8
Hojat, M., Mangione, S., Nasca, T., et al. (2004). An empirical study of decline in empathy in
medical school. Medical Education, 38, 939-941.
Hojat, M., Mangione, S., Nasca, T., et al. (2001). The Jefferson scale of physician empathy:
development and preliminary psychometric data. Educ Psychol Measurement, 61, 349-356.
Igmond, A., and Snaith, R. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psych Scan,
67, 361-370.
Maycut, P., and Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and
practical guide. London: Falmer Press.
Smith, A (1759). The theory of moral sentiments (6th ed.). London: A. Millar.
Stepien, K., and Baernstein, M. (2006). Educating for empathy. J Gen Intern Med, 21, 524-530.
Van De Camp, K., Vernooij-Daseen, M., Bottema, G., and Bottema, B. (2004). How to
conceptualize professionalism: a qualitative study. Medical Teacher, 26(8), 696-702.
Woolf, K., Cave, J., McManus, C, and Dacre, J. (2007). It gives you an understanding you
cant get from any book. The relationship between medical students and doctors personal illness
experiences and their performance. BMC Medical Education, 1-8.
The scores you earned on each quality indicator, as published in the rubric, are as
follows: Responsiveness 4 Content 4 Writing 4 [Note: Application assignments
may earn a maximum of 12 points and are evaluated on three quality indicators
using a 4-point scale where 4 = Exemplary, 3 = Meets the Standard, 2 =
Progressing, and 1 = Emerging. Please refer to the grading rubric located in
Course Information.]
Did the learner create a chart that synthesizes relevant elements from at least
five research articles related to their area of interest? YES
Did the learner include at least one example for each approach/method
(quantitative and quantitative)? YES
Outstanding work, Ana.