Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2016 Ipsos. All rights reserved. Contains Ipsos' Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be
disclosed or reproduced without the prior written consent of Ipsos.
2016 Ipsos
date
May 28-June 1, 2016
a sample of
1,615
Americans
including
759
Democrats
525
Republicans
ages
174
Independents
18+
The precision of the Reuters/Ipsos online polls is measured using a credibility interval.
In this case, the poll has a credibility interval of plus or minus the following percentage points
2.8
4.1
4.9
8.5
Democrats
Republicans
Independents
For more information about credibility intervals, please see the appendix.
The data were weighted to the U.S. current population data by:
Gender
Age
Education
Ethnicity
To see more information on this and other Reuters/Ipsos polls, please visit
http://polling.reuters.com/.
2016 Ipsos
12%
Right Direction
Wrong Track
24%
4% 10%
12%
12%
15%
40%
All Adults
Dont Know
Democrats
Republicans
Independents
48%
64%
86%
73%
Generally speaking, would you say things in this country are heading in the right direction, or are they off on the wrong track?
Generally speaking, would you say things in this country are heading in
the right direction, or are they off on the wrong track?
2016 Ipsos
Economy generally
Unemployment / lack of jobs
War / foreign conflicts
Immigration
Terrorism / terrorist attacks
Healthcare
Energy issues
Morality
Education
Crime
Environment
Dont know
Other
2016 Ipsos
Total
Democrat
Republican
Independent
20%
10%
4%
6%
14%
11%
1%
7%
6%
4%
5%
5%
6%
19%
11%
5%
4%
14%
13%
2%
5%
8%
5%
6%
3%
6%
21%
8%
4%
9%
19%
9%
1%
12%
3%
3%
3%
2%
6%
24%
15%
0%
9%
8%
11%
1%
6%
7%
4%
2%
5%
8%
Economy Generally
45%
Unemployment / jobs
40%
Healthcare
Terrorism
35%
Immigration
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
2012
2016 Ipsos
2013
2014
2015
2016
Barack Obama
Overall, do you approve or disapprove about the way Barack Obama is handling his job as
President?
Is that strongly (approve/disapprove) or somewhat (approve/disapprove)? (Asked of those who selected approve or disapprove)
Q2b. If you had to choose, do you lean more towards approve or disapprove? (Asked of those who selected dont know)
Strongly approve
Somewhat approve
Lean towards approve
Lean towards disapprove
Somewhat disapprove
Strongly disapprove
Not sure
TOTAL APPROVE
TOTAL DISAPPROVE
2016 Ipsos
Total
Democrat
Republican
Independent
27%
20%
4%
2%
10%
32%
5%
52%
44%
45%
31%
5%
2%
8%
8%
2%
80%
18%
9%
7%
2%
1%
13%
67%
1%
19%
81%
14%
18%
9%
3%
11%
38%
7%
42%
51%
0%
JAN 1-7, 2012
JAN 22-28, 2012
FEB 12-18, 2012
MAR 4-MAR 10, 2012
MAR 25-31, 2012
APR 15-21, 2012
MAY 6-12, 2012
MAY 27-JUN 2, 2012
JUN 17-23, 2012
JUL 8-14, 2012
JUL 29-AUG 4, 2012
AUG 19-25, 2012
SEPT 10-15, 2012
SEPT 30-OCT 6, 2012
OCT 21-27, 2012
NOV 11-17, 2012
DEC 2-8, 2012
DEC 23-29, 2012
JAN 8-14, 2013
JAN 29-FEB 4, 2013
FEB 19-25, 2013
MAR 12-18, 2013
APR 2-8, 2013
APR 23-29, 2013
MAY 14-20, 2013
JUN 4-10, 2013
JUN 25-JUL 1, 2013
JUL 16-22, 2013
AUG 6-12, 2013
AUG 27-SEPT 2, 2013
SEPT 17-23, 2013
OCT 8-14, 2013
OCT 29-NOV 4, 2013
NOV 19-25, 2013
DEC 10-16, 2013
DECEMBER 31, 2013
JAN 15-21, 2014
FEB 5-11, 2014
FEB 26-MAR 4, 2014
MAR 19-25, 2014
APR 9-15, 2014
APR 30-MAY 6, 2014
MAY 21-27, 2014
JUN 11-17, 2014
JUL 2-8, 2014
JUL 23-29, 2014
AUG 13-19, 2014
SEPT 3-9, 2014
SEPT 24-30, 2014
OCT 15-21, 2014
NOV 5-11, 2014
NOV 26-DEC 1, 2014
DEC 17-23, 2014
JAN 8-14, 2015
JAN 29-FEB 4, 2015
FEB. 19-25, 2015
MARCH 12-18, 2015
APRIL 2-8, 2015
APRIL 23-29, 2015
MAY 21-27, 2015
JUN 11- JUN 17, 2015
JULY 1-JULY 7, 2015
JULY 22- JULY 28, 2015
AUG 12- AUG 18, 2015
SEPT 3-9, 2015
SEPT 24-30, 2015
OCTOBER 15-21, 2015
NOVEMBER 4-10, 2015
NOVEMBER 25-
DECEMBER 16-22, 2015
JAUNARY 6-12, 2016
JANUARY 29-FEBRUARY
FEBRUARY 20-24, 2016
MARCH 11-15, 2016
APRIL 2-APRIL 6, 2016
APRIL 22-26, 2016
MAY 13-17, 2016
Weekly Approval
70%
60%
52%
50%
40%
44%
30%
20%
Total Approve
Total Disapprove
10%
2016 Ipsos
* Starting June 1st, 2016, this slide will reflect data from the same five-day field period as the rest of this report. Previously, this
chart was based off of a seven-day roll-up.
9
REGISTERED VOTERS
Please think ahead now to the next Presidential election this year, in 2016.
If the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries were being held today, for whom of the following would you vote?
(Asked of registered voters, n=850)
Hillary Clinton
Bernie Sanders
Wouldnt vote
2016 Ipsos
Total
(n=850)
44%
44%
11%
Democrat
(n=655)
51%
43%
6%
Independent
(n=129)
20%
51%
30%
10
51% Clinton
50%
43% Sanders
40%
30%
20%
10%
WEEK OF
6/1/2016
MAY-16
APR-16
MAR-16
FEB-16
JAN-16
DEC-15
NOV-15
OCT-15
SEP-15
AUG-15
JUL-15
0%
Please think ahead now to the next Presidential election this year, in 2016.
If the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries were being held today, for whom of the following would you vote?
2016 Ipsos
11
REGISTERED VOTERS
General Head-to-Heads
If the 2016 presidential election were being held today and the candidates were as below,
for whom would you vote?
(Asked of registered voters, n=1,332)
2016 Ipsos
Total
Democrat
Republican
Independent
43%
34%
13%
4%
6%
72%
9%
11%
4%
4%
9%
73%
11%
2%
4%
19%
34%
22%
8%
17%
12
2016 Ipsos
6/1/16
5/25/16
5/18/16
5/11/16
5/4/16
4/27/16
4/20/16
4/13/16
4/6/16
3/30/16
3/23/16
3/16/16
3/9/16
3/2/16
2/24/16
2/17/16
2/10/16
2/3/16
1/27/16
1/20/16
1/13/16
1/6/16
REGISTERED VOTERS
50%
43% Clinton
40%
30%
34% Trump
20%
10%
0%
13
2016 Ipsos
6/1/16
5/25/16
5/18/16
5/11/16
5/4/16
4/27/16
4/20/16
4/13/16
4/6/16
3/30/16
3/23/16
70%
6/1/16
5/25/16
5/18/16
5/11/16
5/4/16
4/27/16
4/20/16
4/13/16
4/6/16
3/30/16
3/23/16
3/16/16
3/9/16
3/2/16
2/24/16
2/17/16
2/10/16
2/3/16
1/27/16
1/20/16
1/13/16
1/6/16
70%
3/16/16
3/9/16
3/2/16
2/24/16
2/17/16
2/10/16
2/3/16
1/27/16
1/20/16
1/13/16
1/6/16
REGISTERED VOTERS
Would you say you are generally favorable or unfavorable towards these public figures?
Donald Trump
60%
60% Unfavorable
50%
40%
40% Favorable
30%
Hillary Clinton
60%
50%
40%
54% Unfavorable
46% Favorable
30%
14
Political Identity
17%
Strong Democrat
Moderate Democrat
Lean Democrat
Lean Republican
23%
8%
5%
Moderate Republican
17%
10%
Strong Republican
Independent
None of these
DK
11%
7%
4%
48%
Democrat
Republican
Independent
None/DK
31%
11%
10%
2016 Ipsos
15
The calculation of credibility intervals assumes that Y has a binomial distribution conditioned on the
parameter \, i.E., Y|~bin(n,), where n is the size of our sample. In this setting, Y counts the number
of yes, or 1, observed in the sample, so that the sample mean (y ) is a natural estimate of the true
population proportion . This model is often called the likelihood function, and it is a standard concept
in both the bayesian and the classical framework. The bayesian 1 statistics combines both the prior
distribution and the likelihood function to create a posterior distribution. The posterior distribution
represents our opinion about which are the plausible values for adjusted after observing the sample
data. In reality, the posterior distribution is ones knowledge base updated using the latest survey
information. For the prior and likelihood functions specified here, the posterior distribution is also a
beta distribution ((/y)~(y+a,n-y+b)), but with updated hyper-parameters.
Our credibility interval for is based on this posterior distribution. As mentioned above, these intervals
represent our belief about which are the most plausible values for given our updated knowledge base.
There are different ways to calculate these intervals based on (/y). Since we want only one measure
of precision for all variables in the survey, analogous to what is done within the classical framework, we
will compute the largest possible credibility interval for any observed sample. The worst case occurs
when we assume that a=1 and b=1 and y=n/2. Using a simple approximation of the posterior by the
normal distribution, the 95% credibility interval is given by, approximately:
2016 Ipsos
16
SAMPLE SIZE
2,000
1,500
1,000
750
500
350
200
100
CREDIBILITY
INTERVALS
2.5
2.9
3.5
4.1
5.0
6.0
7.9
11.2
1 Bayesian
2 Kish,
Data Analysis, Second Edition, Andrew Gelman, John B. Carlin, Hal S. Stern, Donald B. Rubin, Chapman & Hall/CRC | ISBN: 158488388X | 2003
L. (1992). Weighting for unequal Pi . Journal of Official, Statistics, 8, 2, 183200.
2016 Ipsos
17
ABOUT IPSOS
GAME CHANGERS
2016 Ipsos
18