Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Air Pollution is presenting a big threat in many parts of world. The prime reason for air pollution is
burning fossil fuels which will have a huge negative impact on human health. Increase in traffic volumes
and changes in travel-related characteristics increase vehicular emissions significantly. Calculation of
vehicular exhaust by collecting the traffic data for the following case studies i.e Four laning project of
Wardha to Butibori for a design length of 59.020Km and Up-gradation of NH-131A from Km 6.000 to
Km 55.000 near Purnea in the state of Bihar. By using traffic projections generated from traffic
forecasting models, vehicular gaseous emission coefficients developed by ARAI, Pune for CPCB and
average mileage of vehicles future pollution load on the environment is forecasted by using simple
mathematical model. The present ambient air quality status is mapped by using air quality indices.
Page 1 of 39
LITERATURE REVIEW
Relevant literature is discussed regarding analysis of air quality and forecasting pollution load using simple
mathematic modeling.
Analysis of the air quality is done by the data obtained from the monitoring stations maintained by CPCB.
Air quality index is calibrated using formula.
There are many models like:
Persistence
Climatology
Statistical
Regression
Neural networks
Numerical modeling
Phenomenological and
experience
Predictor variables
For forecasting the state of air. But all the above models are intriguing as they requires vast sets of data. These data
are under NOAA (National oceanic and atmospheric administration) which is inaccessible.
So in order to calculate the future pollution load we used vehicular emissions coefficients obtained from CPCB for
each individual pollutant corresponding to different type of vehicle, future traffic projections from traffic forecasting
models, average vehicular mileage into a simple mathematic model to obtain the future pollution load from
vehicular exhausts.
Page 2 of 39
CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
CERTIICATE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ABSTRACT
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
CHAPTER 01
Page No
1.1 Introduction
10
CHAPTER 02
2.1 Baseline Ambient Air Quality
11
11
11
12
12
13
CHAPTER 03
15
Page 3 of 39
15
3.1.1
Case study1
15
3.1.2
Case study2
24
CHAPTER 04
4.1 Emission control technologies
31
31
31
32
32
33
33
33
33
34
34
34
34
35
35
35
35
4.4.2 Area Restrictions (for private vehicles and/or heavy goods vehicles)
36
Page 4 of 39
36
36
37
4.5.3 Plantation
37
37
38
38
38
LIST OF FIGURES
S.No
NAME
PAGE
Figure 1
12
Figure 2
Traffic projections
21
Figure 3
21
Figure 4
22
Figure 5
22
Figure 6
23
Figure 7
Hydrocarbon emissions
23
Figure 8
Traffic projections
28
Figure 9
28
Figure 10
29
Figure 11
29
Figure 12
30
Page 5 of 39
Figure 13
Hydrocarbon emissions
30
LIST OF TABLES
S.No
NAME
PAGE
Table 1
12
Table 2
13
Table 3
15
Table 4
19
Table 5
19
Table 6
20
Table 7
20
Table 8
24
Table 9
26
Table 10
26
Table 11
27
Table 12
27
Page 6 of 39
CHAPTER 01
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
1.0 Introduction
Air pollution is an important public health problem in most cities of the developing world. Owing to their rapidly
increasing numbers and very limited use of emission control technologies, motor vehicles are emerging as the
largest source of urban air pollution in the developing world. For years transportation officials have relied on adding
highway capacitybuilding new expressways and adding lanes to existing freeways to accommodate travel
demand in growing metropolitan areas. Such increases in capacity were thought not only to bring congestion relief
but also to improve air quality and fuel efficiency by contributing to free-flowing traffic conditions.
This conventional wisdom has been challenged by environmental planners and other analysts who take a long-term
perspective on the effects of additional highway capacity. They concede that adding highway capacity may initially
reduce some vehicle emissions and improve fuel efficiency by smoothing traffic flows and reducing stop-and-go
traffic, although the benefits may not be as significant as were once believed. However, these positive effects may be
eroded over time by growth in travel stimulated by the new capacity. Improved levels of highway service may
encourage shifts from less polluting modes of transportation and induce new or longer trips once discouraged by
congested conditions. As traffic volume grows, traffic operations may deteriorate, producing levels of congestion
comparable with previous conditions but at higher traffic volumes. In the long run, these analysts maintain, new
highway capacity will improve access and may encourage development in low-density areas not amenable to transit.
Low-density development requires more frequent and longer trips, increasing emission levels and energy use and
further degrading air quality.
Emissions models, which measure the polluting effects of motor vehicle travel, inadequately represent the emission
performance of in-service vehicles. Current data on the relationship between vehicle speeds and emission levels
critical to analyzing highway capacity projects that will change the distribution of traffic speed levels and variability
of speedsare based on averages that mask wide variances across individual vehicle performance, roadway
conditions, and driving behavior. Moreover, the models do not adequately capture major suspected sources of
emissions from vehicle accelerations and high speeds, although some research is under way to understand these
phenomena. Planning agencies often apply current speed-emission relationships as if they were precisely known.
Despite the limitations of the existing knowledge base, engineers and scientists are being pressed to provide reliable
estimates of the likely effects of adding highway capacity on emissions and energy use to assist legislators, state
officials, metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), and judges in reaching decisions on these issues. Thus a
Page 7 of 39
review of the current state of knowledge has been undertaken to evaluate the scientific evidence concerning these
effects and to narrow areas of disagreement. The specific questions at issue are described and, where possible,
research or analyses that could be conducted to speed their resolution are recommended. More specifically, the study
committee.
To analyze baseline ambient air quality status of the selected areas by collecting the air quality parameters
such as Sulphur dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), Respirable Particulate Matter (PM10), Fine Particulate
Matter (PM2.5), Carbon Monoxide (CO).
To collect corresponding data related to traffic projections for the selected areas.
To calculate the pollution load emitted by motor vehicles for the projected years with
project scenario.
Page 8 of 39
and without
CHAPTER 02
METHODOLOGY
The sampling station had free exposure so that it did not collect air from stagnant pockets.
The sampling point was not directly influenced by any local source of emission.
Page 9 of 39
Page 10 of 39
NO X
PM
CO2
HC
CAR/JEEP
3.01
0.12
0.01
126.5
0.19
TATA MAGIC
0.72
0.84
0.19
156.75
0.14
RTC BUS
3.92
6.53
0.3
602.01
0.16
PRIVATE BUS
3.92
6.53
0.3
602.01
0.16
SCHOOL BUS
3.92
6.53
0.3
602.01
0.16
MINI BUS
3.66
2.12
0.48
401.25
1.35
2 AXLE
3.92
6.53
0.3
602.1
0.16
3 AXLE
3.92
6.53
0.3
602.1
0.16
MULTI AXLE
9.3
1.24
762.4
0.37
OVER SIZED
9.3
1.24
762.4
0.37
LGV/LCV
3.66
2.12
0.48
401.25
1.35
MINI LCV
3.01
0.12
0.01
126.5
0.19
Page 11 of 39
WITH
PROJECT
PROJECT
CAR/JEEP
8.5
12
TATA MAGIC
15
20
RTC BUS
4.5
5.5
PRIAVATE BUS
4.5
5.5
SCHOOL BUS
4.5
5.5
MINI BUS
11
2 AXLE
5.1
3 AXLE
3.5
4.5
MULTI AXLE
OVER SIZED
LGV/LCV
10
14
MINI LCV
12
15
TYPE OF VEHICLE
Page 12 of 39
CHAPTER- 03
CASE STUDIES
Case Study -1: Upgradtion of NH-131A from Km 6.000 to Km 55.000 near Purnea in the state of Bihar.
2.
Case Study -2: Up-gradation of Wardha - Butibori Section of NH-361 ( MSH3 Extension project ).
Upgradtion of NH-131A from Km 6.000 to Km 55.000 near Purnea in the state of Bihar.
The baseline air quality status of the study area has been monitored at selected locations which represent the whole
study area and the analysis results are given in the table below.
Table 3: Ambient air quality during study period
Location/Cate
gory
Min
Max
Mean
75 Percentile
98 Percentile
CPCB
Standards
47.2
51.5
100
PM10 (g/m3)
Belouri
Chowk
39.8
52.4
45.2
Page 13 of 39
Kathiar
51.9
70.3
59.8
64
69.3
100
Nawabganj,
Manihar
38.9
53.4
47.9
50.6
53.3
100
Sahibganj,
47.6
65.2
56.1
60.5
64.9
100
Belouri
Chowk
20
27.4
23.2
24.7
26.9
60
Kathiar
27.5
41.5
33.2
36.2
40.7
60
Nawabganj,
Manihar
20.7
28.3
25.1
26.5
28.3
60
Sahibganj,
25
35.1
29.3
32.1
34.5
60
Belouri
Chowk
4.1
5.8
4.9
5.3
5.7
80
Kathiar
4.6
6.8
5.6
6.1
6.8
80
Nawabganj,
Manihar
4.2
5.8
4.9
5.2
5.7
80
Sahibganj,
4.3
6.6
5.3
5.6
6.5
80
Belouri
Chowk
12.2
17.1
14.5
15.7
16.8
80
Kathiar
15.6
26.8
22.3
23.7
26.1
80
Gangapsrshad
PM2.5 (g/m3)
Gangapsrshad
SO2 (g/m3)
Gangapsrshad
NO2 (g/m3)
Page 14 of 39
Nawabganj,
Manihar
11.4
16.9
13.7
14.6
16.7
80
Sahibganj,
11.4
18.3
14.2
15.7
17.9
80
Belouri
Chowk
1.3
1.1
1.2
1.3
Kathiar
1.7
1.3
1.5
1.7
Nawabganj,
Manihar
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Sahibganj,
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Belouri
Chowk
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
Kathiar
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
Nawabganj,
Manihar
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
Sahibganj,
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
Gangapsrshad
CO (mg/m3)
Gangapsrshad
HC (g/m3)
Gangapsrshad
The mean Respirable Particulate Matter (PM10) values observed in the range between 45.2 59.8
g/m3 as against the CPCB standard of 100 g/m3 for residential / industrial category. The maximum and
98 percentile values found to be well within the stipulated standards for all the locations.
th
The mean Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) values were found in the range between 24.7 36.2
g/m3 as against the CPCB standard of 60 g/m3 for residential / industrial category. The maximum and
98th percentile values found to be well within the stipulated standards for all the locations.
Page 15 of 39
The mean Oxides of Nitrogen (NO2) values were observed in the range between 13.7 22.3
3
g/m as against the CPCB standard of 80 g/m3 for residential / industrial category. The maximum and
98th percentile values found to be well within the stipulated standards for all the locations.
The mean Sulfur dioxide values were observed in the range between 4.9 5.6 g/m3 against the
CPCB standard of 80 g/m3 for Residential / industrial category. The maximum and 98th percentile values
found to be well within the stipulated standards for all the locations.
The mean carbon monoxide levels observed in the range between <1.0 1.3 mg/ m3 as against the
CPCB standard of 4 mg/ m3 for residential / industrial category. The maximum and 98th percentile values
found to be well within the stipulated standards for all the locations.
The mean Hydro-carbon values were observed in the range between <0.01- <0.01 g/m3.
AQI Values
0 to 50
Good
51 to 100
Moderate
101 to 150
151 to 200
Unhealthy
201 to 300
Very Unhealthy
301 to 500
Hazardous
(high) I(low)
[ ()] + ()
C(high) C(low)
Page 16 of 39
150 101
(41.5 35.5) + 101 = 116
55.4 35.5
Location
AQI Value
Category
Belouri Chowk
74
Moderate
Kathiar
95
Moderate
Nawabganj, Manihar
79
Moderate
Sahibganj,
87
Moderate
Gangapsrshad
Year
Car/Jje
Tata
RTC
Priva
Scho
Mini
Multi
Over
LGV/L
Mini
from
to
ep
magic
bus
te bus ol bus
bus
axle
sized
CV
LCV
2012
2013
942
133
176
35
80
54
218
2017
2018
1202
172
225
200
102
68
279
2022
2023
1535
217
36
255
130
87
356
2027
2028
1958
277
72
46
325
166
11
111
458
2032
2033
2499
468
92
59
415
212
14
142
579
2037
2038
3189
597
117
75
530
270
18
181
740
2 axle
3 axle
22
156
44
28
287
56
367
354
452
Page 17 of 39
2042
2043
3877
519
726
143
91
644
328
22
220
CO
NOX
PM
CO2
HC
2012-2013
79862.76
14116.21
763.39
4148572.94
5040.48
2017-2018
130121.81
23080.15
1249.35
6765851.57
8209.65
2022-2023
211884.78
37525.64
2028.17
11011478.6
13367.81
2027-2028
345200.05
61178.73
3305.92
17942719.5
21777.91
2032-2033
562278.15
99647.68
5387.31
29226721.7
35477.7
2037-2038
915749.82
162242.48
8771.54
47596587.6
57778.07
2042-2043
1353386.01
239761.78
12960.06
70340721.7
85387.43
Traffic
CO
NOX
PM
CO2
HC
2012-2013
57516.71
11015.58
590.66
3046959.79
3619.51
2017-2018
93720.05
18011.61
966.74
4969874.37
5895.7
2022-2023
152606.8
29284.58
1569.43
8088170.25
9599.77
2027-2028
248626.52
47746.67
2558.36
13179746.9
15639.29
Page 18 of 39
899
2032-2033
404969.49
77766.72
4168.85
21467956.2
25477.21
2037-2038
659558.53
126615.19
6787.62
34961283.3
41492.13
2042-2043
801815.19
153920.74
8520.64
42501318.3
50440.5
4000000
3500000
3437570
3000000
2693700
2500000
2109335
2000000
1653815
1500000
1000000
1013970
1295385
500000
0
2012-2013
2017-2018
2022-2023
2027-2028
YEAR
Page 19 of 39
2032-2033
2037-2038
2042-2043
2020-2021
2025-2026
2030-2031
YEAR
CO WITH
Page 20 of 39
2035-2036
2040-2041
2045-2046
300000
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
0
2015-2016
2020-2021
2025-2026
NOX W/O
2030-2031
2035-2036
2040-2041
2045-2046
YEAR
NOX WITH
2020-2021
2025-2026
2030-2031
PM W/O
YEAR
PM WITH
Page 21 of 39
2035-2036
2040-2041
2045-2046
2020-2021
2025-2026
CO2 W/O
2030-2031
2035-2036
2040-2041
2045-2046
YEAR
CO2 WITH
2020-2021
2025-2026
2030-2031
HC W/O
YEAR
HC WITH
Page 22 of 39
2035-2036
2040-2041
2045-2046
Min
Max
Mean
75 Percentile
98 Percentile
CPCB
Standard
Wardha Junction
30.9
46.5
37.4
36.5
45.5
60
Seloo
27
38.3
33
33.6
37.7
60
Buti Bori
26.5
35.9
32.3
32
35.8
60
Wardha Junction
6.4
7.6
7.6
80
Seloo
5.3
6.5
6.4
80
Buti Bori
5.6
6.8
6.1
6.1
6.7
80
Wardha Junction
29.5
35.9
32.4
32.7
35.5
80
Seloo
18.6
22.5
20.5
20.5
22.4
80
PM2.5(g/m3)
SO2 (g/m3)
NO2 (g/m3)
Page 23 of 39
Buti Bori
26.9
31.7
29.6
29.8
31.7
80
Wardha Junction
1.2
1.9
1.5
1.5
1.9
Seloo
<1
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.2
Buti Bori
1.1
1.8
1.5
1.5
1.8
Wardha Junction
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Seloo
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Buti Bori
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
CO (mg/m3)
HC (g/m3)
The mean Respirable Particulate Matter (PM10) values observed in the range between 64.0 74.1 g/m3 as
against the CPCB standard of 100 g/m3 for residential / industrial category. The maximum and 98 th percentile values
found to be well within the stipulated standards for all the locations.
The mean Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) values were found in the range between 32.3 37.4 g/m3 as against
the CPCB standard of 60 g/m3 for residential/industrial category. The maximum and 98 th percentile values found to
be well within the stipulated standards for all the locations.
The mean Sulfur dioxide values were observed in the range between 6.007.00 g/m3 against the CPCB standard
of 80 g/m3 for residential / industrial category. The maximum and 98 th percentile values found to be well within the
stipulated standards for all the locations.
The mean Dioxides of Nitrogen (NO2) values were observed in the range between 20.5 32.4g/m3 against the
CPCB standard of 80 g/m3 for residential / industrial category. The maximum and 98 th percentile values found to be
well within the stipulated standards for all the locations.
The mean carbon monoxide (CO) levels observed in the range between 1.1 1.5 mg/m3 as against the CPCB
standard of 4mg/m3 for residential / industrial category. The maximum and 98 th percentile values found to be well
within the stipulated standards for all the locations.
The Hydro carbon levels observed in the range between <0.01 g/m3 - <0.01 g/m3 .
Page 24 of 39
In general, the ambient air quality in the study area is satisfactory. It is envisaged that due to proposed four laning
project traffic may further come down and ease the vehicles movement and traffic congestion, which may leads to
reduce the pollution levels.
Table 9 : AQI Values at AAQMS Stations
Location
AQI
Category
Wardha Junction
106
Seloo
95
Moderate
Buti Bori
93
Moderate
Year
to
Car/Je Tata
ep
magic
RTC
bus
Priva Scho
te bus ol bus
Mini
bus
2 axle
3 axle
Multi
axle
Over
sized
LGV/L
CV
Mini
LCV
2015
2016
2629
33
307
215
38
570
1201
1337
309
431
2020
2021
3619
46
405
284
12
53
707
1661
1849
427
596
2025
2026
4866
61
519
364
15
71
827
2233
2486
575
801
2030
2031
6389
81
650
455
19
93
923
2933
3265
755
1052
2035
2036
8194
103
795
557
23
119
979
3761
4186
968
1350
2040
2041
10457
132
967
677
28
152
1029
4800
5343
1235
1722
2045
2046
12711
160
1132
793
33
185
1071
5834
6495
1501
2094
CO
NOX
PM
CO2
HC
2015-2016
860031.63
649301.83
61993.88
74283389.01
52696.03
2020-2021
1624670.46
1221058.26
117609.11
139852691.3
99777.82
2025-2026
2915054.47
2170625.06
210925.05
249438318.58
179503.97
2030-2031
4990386.41
3683976.53
360602.57
42707866.66
307972.77
2035-2036
8166867.01
5989709.63
590464.82
692076983.42
504941.88
2040-2041
13247732.26
9666840.97
957763.53
1118977232.98
820199.2
2045-2046
19526606.66
14203473.1
1411552.15
1645990770.59
1209948.46
CO
NOX
PM
CO2
HC
2015-2016
631815.09
494651.28
46817.08
55711781.36
38490.74
2020-2021
1193080.27
929670.08
88785.31
104826744.07
72862
2025-2026
2139451.99
1651598.68
159172.39
186830718.44
131027.22
2030-2031
3660747.37
2801558.12
272039.71
317904202.43
224719.26
2035-2036
5988380.29
4552684.34
445320.36
517746174.09
368335.47
2040-2041
9710782.83
7344736.81
722175.41
836749395.98
598166.91
2045-2046
14310409.49
10788922.47
1064197.6
1230504260.99
882284.96
Page 26 of 39
25000000
22248940
20000000
17692645
15000000
14022388
10864955
10000000
8217245
6037283
5000000
0
2015-2016
2020-2021
2025-2026
2030-2031
2035-2036
2040-2041
2045-2046
YEAR
YEAR
CO WITH
Page 27 of 39
Page 28 of 39
16000000
14000000
12000000
10000000
8000000
6000000
4000000
2000000
0
2015-2016
2020-2021
2025-2026
2030-2031
2035-2036
2040-2041
2045-2046
YEAR
NOX W/O
NOX With
2020-2021
2025-2026
PM W/O
2030-2031
YEAR
PM With
Page 29 of 39
2035-2036
2040-2041
2045-2046
2020-2021
2025-2026
2030-2031
2035-2036
2040-2041
2045-2046
YEAR
CO2 W/O
CO2 WITH
1400000
1200000
1000000
800000
600000
400000
200000
0
2015-2016
HC W/O
2020-2021
2025-2026
2030-2031
YEAR
HC WITH
Page 30 of 39
2035-2036
2040-2041
2045-2046
CHAPTER- 04
Measures to tackle air pollutant emissions from road transportation can be broadly divided into four
categories:
Emission Control Technologies
Traffic Control Measures
Modes of Transport
Transport Policies
Oxidation catalysts are also effective in controlling smoke and NO2 emissions. The sulphur
content of diesel fuel is critical to the effectiveness of the oxidation catalyst technology as high
sulphur content diesel can poison the catalyst.
Diesel Catalytic Converters are considered to be an effective and viable measure to
achieve emissions reductions and improve air quality, especially at the roadside.
4.1.5 Tailpipe Emissions- Particulate Traps
Particulate traps are an effective means of achieving particulates removal from diesel
exhaust. Diesel particulates consists of soot(soot carbonaceous materials giving rise to black
smoke), a soluble organic fraction (SOF)(unburned hydrocarbons from the lube oil and fuel) and
oxides(mainly sulphate derived from sulphur in the fuel). Diesel Catalytic Converters are
effective in reducing SOF emissions and particulate traps are effective in reducing soot
emissions.
4.1.6 Alternative Fuels-Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)
(a) Low sulphur fuel which has less pollution potential can be used as an alternative to high
Sulphur fuels.
(b) Comparatively more refined liquid petroleum gas (LPG) or liquefied natural gas (LNG) can be used
instead of traditional high contaminant fuels such as coal. LPG is an oil refinery by-product. It is a
light, gaseous fraction that is liquefied by cooling. The advantage of LPG over petrol and diesel
is the reduction of pollutant emissions particularly the emission of particulates. LPG as an
alternative fuel is an effective means of reducing emissions from selected elements of vehicle
fleet.
additional traffic growth does not take advantage of the reduced degree of congestion. Studies
have shown savings in fuel consumption and hence emissions of up to 15 to 18% can be
achieved depending on the prevailing traffic conditions.
4.2.2 Park and Ride
Park and ride schemes provide parking facilities serviced by buses or rail on the fringes
of city centers, with the aim of encouraging the transfer from private to public transport.
However, there is evidence that such schemes may stimulate both additional and longer trips. For
example, many trips formerly made entirely by public transport may in part be transferred to
cars. Park and ride schemes have the potential to reduce car use within the central area. Some
form of central area parking control or other form of traffic restraint will be required to
encourage the use of park and ride facilities. However provision of park and ride alone is not
considered to be an effective measure for reducing air pollution emissions.
Goods vehicles and private cars are the main contributors of pollutant emissions There
are limitations on the effectiveness of current emission control technologies to reduce emissions,
especially for heavy goods vehicles. A better alternative may be replace the trips generated by
heavy goods vehicles with a more environmentally friendly mode of transport, example, rail.
However it should be noted that there are limitations of freight rail transport, not least of which is
that it cannot replace internal service deliveries of goods.
4.3.4 Expand River Trade Terminal Operation
The river trade terminal operations could be expanded which in turn will reduce the no of
trips made by cross boundary heavy goods vehicles. As heavy goods vehicles are the main
contributors of air pollutants, switch to marine transport can at least, assist in reducing local air
pollution in the areas. However, this will have implications on the operations of the River Trade
Terminal and other economic implications.
Page 35 of 39
4.4.2 Area Restrictions (for private vehicles and/or heavy goods vehicles)
An area restriction is unlikely to reduce the territory-wide pollutant emissions as vehicles
will tend to bypass the restricted areas. However, when area restrictions are implemented with
other measures, such as electronic road pricing and pedestrainisation, it can be an effective
means of addressing pollution hot-spots. It is also a mean to encourage public transport as private
vehicle will find it less convenient to access these areas. Alternatively, area restrictions could be
implemented when the Air Pollution Index is predicted to be high. This is more effective when
implemented with an economic instrument, such as electric road pricing.
Areas restrictions, when implemented with other measures, is considered to be a viable
means of managing air quality.
Page 36 of 39
Page 38 of 39
Page 39 of 39