Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Theory
AVL BOOST
VERSION 2013.2
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
Revision
A
B
C
D
E
Date
17-Jul-2009
19-Nov-2010
29-Jul-2011
06-Jun-2013
15-Nov-2013
Description
BOOST v2009 Theory
BOOST v2010 Theory
BOOST v2011 Theory
BOOST v2013.1 Theory
BOOST v2013.2 Theory
Document No.
01.0114.2009
01.0114.2010
01.0114.2011
01.0114.2013.1
01.0114.2013.2
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
Table of Contents
1. Introduction _____________________________________________________1-1
1.1. Scope _______________________________________________________________________ 1-1
1.2. User Qualifications ___________________________________________________________ 1-1
1.3. Symbols _____________________________________________________________________ 1-1
AST.01.0114.2013.2 - 15-Nov-2013
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
ii
AST.01.0114.2013.2 - 15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
List of Figures
Figure 2-1: Considered Mass Fractions................................................................................................................... 2-1
Figure 2-2: Energy Balance of Cylinder .................................................................................................................. 2-5
Figure 2-3: Inner Valve Seat Diameter ................................................................................................................... 2-8
Figure 2-4: User-Defined Scavenging Model ........................................................................................................ 2-11
Figure 2-5: User-Defined Scavenging Input ......................................................................................................... 2-11
Figure 2-6: Standard Crank Train ........................................................................................................................ 2-12
Figure 2-7: Approximation of a Measured Heat Release ..................................................................................... 2-21
Figure 2-8: Influence of Shape Parameter 'm' ...................................................................................................... 2-21
Figure 2-9: Superposition of Two Vibe Functions................................................................................................ 2-23
Figure 2-10: Flame Arrival at Cylinder Wall; Beginning of Wall-Combustion Mode ....................................... 2-29
Figure 2-11: Flame Front Propagation ................................................................................................................. 2-30
Figure 2-12: Cylinder Volume Partitioning .......................................................................................................... 2-33
Figure 2-13: Valve Seat Geometry .......................................................................................................................... 2-35
Figure 2-14: Flame Front Combustion Weight .................................................................................................... 2-38
Figure 2-15: Spray Discretization in the Multi-Zone Combustion Model.......................................................... 2-42
Figure 2-16: Spray Discretization in the Multi-Zone Combustion Model.......................................................... 2-46
Figure 2-17: Description of 6 Zones and their Interaction.................................................................................. 2-48
Figure 2-18: Comparison of Adiabatic Flame Temperature and resulting laminar Flame Speed ................. 2-51
Figure 2-19: Pre-Chamber Geometry .................................................................................................................... 2-52
Figure 2-20: Simplified Description of Cylinder and Flame Geometry.............................................................. 2-54
Figure 2-21: State Variables and Fluxes in a Burned Zone Stratification Model .............................................. 2-61
Figure 2-23: Gas dynamic viscosity verses Temperature .................................................................................... 2-71
Figure 2-22: Pipe Bend Parameters ...................................................................................................................... 2-71
Figure 2-23: Pipe Bend Loss Coefficient ............................................................................................................... 2-72
Figure 2-24: Finite Volume Concept ..................................................................................................................... 2-74
Figure 2-25: Linear Reconstruction of the Flow Field ........................................................................................ 2-74
Figure 2-26: Pressure Waves from Discontinuities at Cell Borders ................................................................... 2-75
Figure 2-27: Main transport effects in a pipe consisting of different wall layers ............................................. 2-75
Figure 2-28: Forward / Backward Running Waves .............................................................................................. 2-78
Figure 2-29: 3D cells, connections and attachments ........................................................................................... 2-81
Figure 2-30: Schematic of the 3D Cell Element: Cells and Connectors ............................................................. 2-82
Figure 2-31: Schematic of the Perforated Connector Element ........................................................................... 2-84
Figure 2-32: Perforated Pipes contained in Pipe ................................................................................................. 2-86
Figure 2-33: Two perforated Pipes contained in Plenum.................................................................................... 2-87
Figure 2-34: The Pressure Function .................................................................................................................. 2-89
Figure 2-35: Distillation curves for different fuel types (Source: www.chevron.com) ..................................... 2-91
Figure 2-36: Full Check Valve Model .................................................................................................................... 2-93
Figure 2-37: Waste Gate ......................................................................................................................................... 2-94
Figure 2-38: Flow Patterns in a Y-Junction ......................................................................................................... 2-95
Figure 2-39: Flow Chart of the ECU ................................................................................................................... 2-101
Figure 2-40: Restriction end correction. ............................................................................................................. 2-107
Figure 2-41: Open end correction. ....................................................................................................................... 2-107
Figure 2-42: Helmholtz end correction. .............................................................................................................. 2-108
Figure 2-43: External Microphone ...................................................................................................................... 2-108
Figure 2-44: Sound pressure level A-weighting ................................................................................................. 2-109
Figure 2-45: External Microphone with ground reflection ............................................................................... 2-110
Figure 2-46: Rate of Heat Release ....................................................................................................................... 2-111
AST.01.0114.2013.2 - 15-Nov-2013
iii
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
1. INTRODUCTION
BOOST simulates a wide variety of engines, 4-stroke or 2-stroke, spark or auto-ignited.
Applications range from small capacity engines for motorcycles or industrial purposes up
to large engines for marine propulsion. BOOST can also be used to simulate the
characteristics of pneumatic systems.
1.1. Scope
This document describes the basic concepts and methods for using the BOOST program to
perform engine cycle simulation.
1.3. Symbols
The following symbols are used throughout this manual. Safety warnings must be strictly
observed during operation and service of the system or its components.
Convention
Meaning
Italics
monospace
MenuOpt
15-Nov-2013
1-1
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
2. THEORETICAL BASIS
Theoretical background including the basic equations for all available elements is
summarized in this chapter to give a better understanding of the AVL BOOST program.
This chapter does not intend to be a thermodynamics textbook, nor does it claim to cover
all aspects of engine cycle simulation.
wFV
wCP
(2.1.1)
The air fuel ratio characteristic for the combustion products is calculated from
AFCP =
wCP wFB
wFB
(2.1.2)
wFB
Figure 2-1 shows the relations of the mass fractions to each other.
15-Nov-2013
2-1
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
For the calculation of the gas properties of exhaust gases the air fuel ratio is used as a
measure for the gas composition. Air fuel ratio in this context means the air fuel ratio at
which the combustion took place from which the exhaust gases under consideration
originate. The composition of the combustion gases is obtained from the chemical
equilibrium considering dissociation at the high temperatures in the cylinder.
c pk
R
= a mk T ( m 1)
(1)
m =1
H k = c pk dT
(2)
M
Hk
a T ( m1) a M +1,k
= mk
+
RT m=1
m
T
(3)
so that
Sk =
c pk
T
dT
(4)
so that
M
Sk
a T ( m 1)
= a 1k ln T + mk
+ a m + 2,k
R
m 1
m=2
(5)
2-2
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
c pk
R
Hk
RT
Sk
R
= a 1k + a 2 k T + a 3k T 2 + a 4 k T 3 + a 5 k T 4
= a 1k +
(6)
a
a
a
a 2k
a
T + 3k T 2 + 4 k T 3 + 5 k T 4 + 6 k
2
3
4
5
T
= a 1k ln T + a 2 k T +
(7)
a 3k 2 a 4 k 3 a 5 k 4
T +
T +
T + a 7k
2
3
4
(8)
HCl
O2
HCNO
OH
GASOLINE
CO
HYDROGEN
CO2
METHANE
METHANOL
N2
ETHANOL
NO
DIESEL
NO2
BUTANE
NO3
PENTANE
N2O
PROPANE
NH3
CH4
C2H2
H2
C2H4
H2O
C2H6
SO
C3H4
SO2
C3H6
SO3
C3H8
For all cases where the above list is not sufficient (i.e. for HCCI auto-ignition) the User
Database enables the user to specify properties for and arbitrary number of additional
species (or to overrule the properties for the species in the internal database.
15-Nov-2013
2-3
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
2-4
Injector: the injected mass is distributed to all species defined as fuel components
using the specified ratio (unless modified locally in the injector).
Results: For all results referring to a Fuel (traces, transients, summary) all
species defined as fuel components are summed up. This means that the specified
ratio is NOT considered.
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
2.2. Cylinder
2.2.1. Basic Conservation Equations
dQ
d (mc u )
dV dQ F
= pc
+
w
d d
d
d
dm
dm
dm
dm
hBB BB + i hi e h qev f ev
d
d
d
dt
(2.2.1)
The variation of the mass in the cylinder can be calculated from the sum of the in-flowing
and out-flowing masses:
dm
dm
dmc
dm BB dmev
+
= i e
d
dt
d
d
d
(2.2.2)
where:
d (mc u )
d
pc
15-Nov-2013
dV
d
piston work
2-5
BOOST v2013.2
dQF
d
dQw
d
hBB
Theory
dmBB
d
mc
pc
cylinder pressure
cylinder volume
QF
fuel energy
Qw
crank angle
hBB
enthalpy of blow-by
dm BB
d
dmi
dme
hi
he
qev
mev
evaporating fuel
The first law of thermodynamics for high pressure cycle states that the change of the
internal energy in the cylinder is equal to the sum of piston work, fuel heat input, wall
heat losses and the enthalpy flow due to blow-by.
Internal/External Mixture Preparation:
Equation 2.2.1 is valid for engines with internal and external mixture preparation.
However, the terms, which take into account the change of the gas composition due to
combustion, are treated differently for internal and external mixture preparation.
For internal mixture preparation it is assumed that
2-6
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
the combustion products mix instantaneously with the rest of the cylinder charge
and form a uniform mixture
as a consequence, the A/F ratio of the charge diminishes continuously from a high
value at the start of combustion to the final value at the end of combustion.
burned and unburned charge have the same pressure and temperature although
the composition is different.
pc =
1
mc Ro Tc
V
(2.2.3)
establishing the relation between pressure, temperature and density, equation 2.2.1 for the
in-cylinder temperature can be solved using a Runge-Kutta method. Once the cylinder
temperature is known, the cylinder pressure can be obtained from the gas equation.
2
dm
= Aeff po1
dt
Ro To1
dm
dt
Aeff
po1
To1
Ro
gas constant
(2.2.4)
p
p
2
2
,
=
1 po1 po1
p2
15-Nov-2013
(2.2.5)
2-7
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
= max
2 1
.
=
+1
+ 1
(2.2.6)
The actual effective flow area can be determined from measured flow coefficients :
d
Aeff = vi
4
2
d vi
(2.2.7)
The flow coefficient varies with valve lift and is determined on a steady-state flow test
rig. The flow coefficient, , represents the ratio between the actual measured mass flow
rate at a certain pressure difference and the theoretical isentropic mass flow rate for the
same boundary conditions. The flow coefficient is related to the cross section area. of the
attached pipe.
The inner valve seat diameter used for the definition of the normalized valve lift can be
seen in the following figure:
2-8
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
2.2.1.2. Scavenging
A perfect mixing model is usually used for four-stroke engines. This means that the
composition of the exhaust gases is the mean composition of the gases in the cylinder, and
also that the energy content of the exhaust gases is equivalent to the mean energy content
of the gases in the cylinder. In this case the change of the air purity over crank angle can
be calculated from the following formula:
1
dR
dm
=
(1 R ) i
d mc
d
R
(2.2.8)
air purity
In the case of a two-stroke engine, the perfect mixing model is not sufficient for accurate
simulations. For this reason BOOST also offers a perfect displacement scavenging model
and a user-defined scavenging model.
In the perfect displacement model no mixing between intake and residual gases takes place
and pure residual gases leave the cylinder (so long as they are available).
The User-defined scavenging model used in the BOOST code divides the cylinder into the
displacement zone and the mixing zone.
The mass balance is based on the following scavenging types:
SCAVENGING TYPE A
According to the (positive) Scavenging Quality
displacement and the mixing zone while pure mixing zone gas is leaving the cylinder
QSC =
m ID
m IZ
m ID
>0
m IZ
SCAVENGING TYPE B
According to the (negative) Scavenging Quality
mixing zone and partially short-circuited to the exhaust port, while shortcut and mixing
zone gas is leaving the cylinder.
QSC =
m IS
shortcut massflow
m IZ
m IS
<0
m IZ
Taking these two scavenging types into account, the Scavenging Quality Function
QSC (SE ) is calculated from the user defined Scavenging Efficiency Function SE(SR).
15-Nov-2013
2-9
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
= const
m (t ) VCY = const V AS (t )
SR(t ) = AS
=
mSREF
VZ
m AS
aspirated mass
VZ
VZ
To consider the different zone temperatures (and densities) during the scavenging process,
the scavenging efficiency SE(t) (used for calculating the scavenging quality QSC (t)=
SE (t ) =
m IZ ( ) m EF ( )
( ) ( ) d
t0
IZ
EF
mZ (t )
Z (t )
m IZ
m EF
mZ
IZ
EF
t0
In order to specify the quality of the scavenging system of a two-stroke engine, scavenging
efficiency is required as a function of scavenge ratio SE(SR). This can be obtained from
scavenging tests.
2-10
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
15-Nov-2013
2-11
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
s = (r + l ) cos r cos( + ) l
e
r
1 sin ( + )
l
l
(2.2.9)
r +l
= arcsin
s
r
l
crank radius
crank angle between vertical crank position and piston TDC position
e
a
(2.2.10)
con-rod length
2-12
Qwi
Ai
(2.2.11)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
Tc
Twi
In the case of the liner wall temperature, the axial temperature variation between the
piston TDC and BDC position is taken into account:
TL = TL ,TDC
1 e cx
xc
(2.2.12)
c = ln L ,TDC
TL ,BDC
TL
liner temperature
TL ,TDC
TL ,BDC
(2.2.13)
For the calculation of the heat transfer coefficient, BOOST provides the following heat
transfer models:
Woschni 1978
Woschni 1990
Hohenberg
Lorenz (for engines with divided combustion chamber only)
AVL 2000 Model
Bargende
WOSCHNI Model
The Woschni model published in 1978 [C45] for the high pressure cycle is summarized as
follows:
w = 130 D
0.2
pc
0.8
Tc
0.53
V T
C1 cm + C 2 D c ,1 ( pc pc ,o )
pc ,1 Vc ,1
C1
= 2.28 + 0.308 cu / cm
C2
C2
cylinder bore
cm
cu
circumferential velocity
VD
p c ,o
15-Nov-2013
0.8
(2.2.14)
2-13
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
Tc ,1
pc ,1
The modified Woschni heat transfer model published in 1990 [C46] aimed at a more
accurate prediction of the heat transfer at part load operation:
2
V
w = 130 D 0.2 pc 0.8 Tc 0.53 c1 cm 1 + 2 TDC IMEP 0.2
V
VTDC
IMEP
0.8
(2.2.15)
VD Tc ,1
V
( pc pc ,o ) 2 C1 cm TDC IMEP 0.2 ,
pc ,1 V
V
2
C2
the heat transfer coefficient is calculated according to the formula published in 1978.
For the gas exchange process, both Woschni models use the same Equation for the heat
transfer coefficient:
(2.2.16)
C3 = 6.18 + 0.417 cu / cm
cylinder bore
cm
cu
circumferential velocity
HOHENBERG Model
In the Hohenberg heat transfer model [C18] the following equation is used for the
calculation of the heat transfer coefficient:
(2.2.17)
LORENZ Model
The Lorenz Heat Transfer Equation is valid for a cylinder with an attached combustion
chamber. In Equation 2.2.14 and 2.2.15 the characteristic speed is:
wC = C1 cm
2-14
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
wC
wC is modified:
dVCP
dt + C C
wC =
1 m
D. .x
4
(2.2.18)
dVCP
volume flow from the connecting pipe to the cylinder
dt
d in 2
0
.
2
0
.
8
0
.
53
c4
= Max Woschni ,0.013d p T
v
d in
C4
= 14.0
bore [m]
pressure [Pa]
temperature [K]
d in
vin
0.8
(2.2.19)
The diameter of the intake port directly at the valve is of special significance for this
model, therefore these diameters of the intake ports should be accurately specified over the
whole port length.
Bargende Heat Transfer Model
An improved correlation for the working cycle of SI engines was published by Bargende
[C2, C7], which takes additional influencing factors into account. Compared to the previous
reported correlations, Bargendes basic formulation considers expressly the effect of the
combustion process on the engine heat transfer introducing an additional term :
(2.2.20)
15-Nov-2013
crankangle
2-15
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
characteristic velocity
density
combustion term
dynamic viscosity
Here, like in Hohenbergs correlation, the diameter D of a sphere of the same volume as
the instantaneous cylinder volume V is taken as the characteristic length. The relevant gas
temperature T at which the gas properties are evaluated is, instead of Tc, the estimated
average temperature within the boundary layer:
(2.2.21)
The boundary temperature, T, is evaluated separately for the piston, liner and head.
The influence of turbulence on engine heat transfer is included in the velocity term, w.
Instead of the mean piston velocity cm , the instantaneous piston velocity cp is argued to be
proportional to the average gas velocity in the cylinder:
(2.2.22)
cp
In this formulation the average turbulent kinetic energy k is provided by a simple global k turbulence model. The specific kinetic energy is set at the start of high pressure is:
(2.2.23)
kSHP
cm
bore
volumetric efficiency
dIV
hIV
(2.2.24)
2-16
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
This assumes a flat piston surface as the effect of any piston bowl on the turbulence is
ignored. The turbulent length scale L is set to the diameter of a sphere whose volume
corresponds to the present volume of the combustion chamber.
(2.2.25)
Combustion Term :
The main goal for the term is to take the flame propagation process into account by
dividing the combustion chamber into two zones: the unburned zone Vu and the burned
zone VB, respectively. For this purpose two sub-terms [A] VB/V and [B] VU/V have
been introduced:
(2.2.26
where:
(2.2.27
and
(2.2.28
xb
TB
TU
TC
TW
Bargende, at that time, found out empirically that the best agreement with numerous
experimental investigations is achieved when:
(2.2.29
To sum up, Bargendes correlation is then given by:
(2.2.30
velocity term
combustion term
15-Nov-2013
2-17
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
Studies show that this correlation obtains high accuracy in predicting the engine heattransfer, especially during the combustion process [C41, C43]. The combustion term
requires and burned and unburned zone. This means that this wall heat transfer model is
intended for use with a two zone model. The combustion term remains constant at 1.0 if
used with a single zone combustion model.
Td = (Tu Tw ) e
The heat transfer coefficient,
Aw p
m c p
+ Tw
(2.2.31)
hv
d vi
(2.2.32)
hv
d vi
(2.2.33)
Td
downstream temperature
Tu
upstream temperature
Tw
Aw
cp
hv
valve lift
dvi
The following table contains the constants used in the formulas above.
Exhaust Valve
2-18
Intake Valve
C4
1.2809
C7
1.5132
C5
7.0451 10 -4
C8
7.1625 10 -4
C6
4.8035 10 -7
C9
5.3719 10 -7
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
2.2.1.5. Blow-By
BOOST considers blow-by losses in the cylinder using the specified effective blow-by gap
and the mean crankcase pressure. The blow-by mass flow rates are calculated at any time
step from the orifice flow Equations (2.2.4 - 2.2.6).
The effective flow area is obtained from the cylinder bore and from the effective blow-by
gap:
Aeff = D
Aeff
cylinder bore
blow-by gap
(2.2.34)
If the cylinder pressure exceeds the mean crankcase pressure, the cylinder pressure and
temperature are used as upstream stagnation pressure and temperature. The mean
crankcase pressure represents the downstream static pressure. The gas properties are
taken from the cylinder.
The blow-by gas has the same energy content as the gases in the cylinder.
If the cylinder pressure is lower than the mean crankcase pressure, the pressure in the
crankcase is used as upstream stagnation pressure, and the cylinder pressure as the
downstream static pressure. The upstream stagnation temperature is set equal to the
piston wall temperature, and the gas composition is set equal to the composition of the gas
which left the cylinder just before the reverse flow into the cylinder started.
2.2.1.6. Evaporation
The model for direct gasoline injection in BOOST relies on the specification of the rate of
evaporation. It is assumed that the density of the liquid fuel is much higher compared to
the fuel vapor density. Hence the presence of liquid fuel can be neglected.
dQF
dTc
instead for
, the heat
d
d
15-Nov-2013
2-19
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
For the direct input of the rate of heat release curve the following options are available:
1. Table
The heat release curve is approximated by specifying reference points versus crank
angle. The y-values are scaled to obtain an area of one beneath the curve. Values
between the points specified are obtained by linear interpolation.
2. Vibe Function
The Vibe function [C39] is often used to approximate the actual heat release
characteristics of an engine:
( m+1)
dx
a
=
(m + 1) y m e a y
d c
dx =
y=
dQ
Q
o
c
crank angle
start of combustion
combustion duration
shape parameter
(2.2.35)
(2.2.36)
(2.2.37)
The integral of the vibe function gives the fraction of the fuel mass which was burned
since the start of combustion:
x=
( m+1)
dx
d = 1 e a y
d
(2.2.38)
Figure 2-7 shows the approximation of an actual heat release diagram of a DI Diesel
engine by a vibe function. The start of combustion, combustion duration and shape
parameter were obtained by a least square fit of the measured heat release curve.
2-20
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
dmBB ,b
dmbub
dV dQF
dQ
dmb
= pc b +
Wb + hu
hBB ,b
d
d
d
d
d
d
15-Nov-2013
(2.2.39)
2-21
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
dmBB ,u
dmu uu
dV
dQ
dmB
= pc u Wu hu
hBB ,u
d
d
d
d
d
index b
burned zone
index
unburned zone
The term
hu
(2.2.40)
dmB
covers the enthalpy flow from the unburned to the burned zone due
d
to the conversion of a fresh charge to combustion products. Heat flux between the two
zones is neglected.
In addition the sum of the volume changes must be equal to the cylinder volume
change and the sum of the zone volumes must be equal to the cylinder volume.
dVb dVu dV
+
=
d
d
d
(2.2.41)
Vb + Vu = V
(2.2.42)
The amount of mixture burned at each time step is obtained from the Vibe function
specified by the user. For all other terms, like wall heat losses etc., models similar to
the single zone models with an appropriate distribution on the two zones are used.
4. Double Vibe Function
The superposition of two vibe functions (Double Vibe) is used to approximate the
measured heat release characteristics of a compression ignition (CI) engine more
accurately. In this case two vibe functions are specified, the first one is used to model
the premixed burning peak and the second one to model the diffusion controlled
combustion. If the fuel allotment to each of the vibe functions is known, the heat
releases obtained from the two vibe functions can be added, thus giving a double vibe
heat release, Figure 2-9.
2-22
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
c = c ,ref
m = mref
id ref
id
combustion duration
AF
engine speed
15-Nov-2013
0.6
AF
ref
AF
p
IVC
p
IVC ,ref
0.6
nref
TIVC ,ref
T
IVC
0.5
nref
(2.2.43)
0.3
(2.2.44)
2-23
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
id
ignition delay
p IVC
TIVC
Index ref
The ignition delay is calculated with the relations found by Andree and Pachernegg [C1]
which assume that the ignition of the injected fuel droplets takes place if the integral of gas
temperature versus time exceeds a threshold.
HIRES ET AL Model
For gasoline engines the change of the combustion duration and the ignition delay is
calculated from the in-cylinder conditions at ignition timing [C19].
1/ 3
c = c ,ref
id = id ref
n f ref
n
f
ref
n
ref
1/ 3
s
ref
s
f sref
s
ref
2/3
(2.2.45)
2/3
(2.2.46)
The laminar flame speed itself is a function of the in-cylinder conditions, the A/F ratio and
the mole fraction of the residual gases [C33].
Note: From BOOST v5.0 on the EBCM and PBCM combustion models
are replaced by the Fractal Combustion Model.
2-24
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
The thermodynamics of the two zone combustion model is outlined in section 2.2.2 - Vibe
Two Zone. The two zone model is used to calculate the gas conditions of the combustion
products (i.e. the burned zone) and the remaining fresh charge (i.e. the unburned zone).
It is well established that the flame front propagating within the turbulent flow field
occurring inside the combustion chamber of an internal combustion engine is a very thin
and highly wrinkled surface. This flame area AT , due to the above wrinkling, is much
higher than the one occurring in a laminar burning process. The latter, i.e. the laminar
flame area AL , can be considered a smooth and spherical surface centered in the spark
plug location. The increase in the flame surface
increase in the turbulent burning rate with respect to the laminar one. The mass burning
rate can be then expressed as:
A
dmb
= u AT S L = u T AL S L
dt
AL
(2.2.47)
Equation 2.2.47 underlines that the flame propagation speed remains equal to the laminar
one also in a turbulent combustion process, nevertheless, the same burning rate can be
also expressed as a function of a turbulent burning speed:
A
dmb
= u AS S T = u T AL S L
dt
AL
ST
SL
AT
=
AL
A variation of the local temperature, exponentially affecting the kinetic reaction rate,
can determine different local burning rates inducing a flame deformation.
The expansion process of the burned gases and the flame curvature together produce a
deviation in the trajectory of fluid particles passing through it and an hydrodynamic
flame deformation can occur.
The turbulent vortices also produce a convective flame wrinkling on different length
scales. This wrinkling is then partly compensated by the local laminar burning process
yielding a "smoothing" effect of the local deformations.
The competition of the above phenomena moreover varies with engine operating
conditions. At very high engine speeds the deformation action can be so intense to produce
a multiple connected flame front, with "islands" of unburned mixture trapped within it.
However it is accepted that in a relevant portion of the combustion regimes occurring in an
ICE, the flame front behaves like a single connected "passive scalar" mainly wrinkled by
the convective action of the turbulent flow field.
15-Nov-2013
2-25
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
fractal object and its flame surface can be then easily computed:
A
T
AL
Lmax
=
Lmin
D3 2
(2.2.48)
The above expression, substituted in the Equation 2.2.47, allows to compute the burning
rate once the laminar flame surface AL and speed S L as well as the wrinkling scales
dt fractals
Lmin
D3 2
AL S L
(2.2.49)
Turbulence
Based on the physical hypothesis recalled above, the computation of the wrinkling scales
L min - L max as well as the fractal dimension D3 must depend on the characteristics of
the turbulent flow field inside the cylinder. Its evaluation within a zero-dimensional model
is really challenging. A number of proposals can be found in the current literature and,
among these, a two-equation modified K k approach [C31], is recalled here, which refers
to the Standard K-k Model in BOOST:
m
dK 1
= m in u in2 P + K ex + K u
u
dt 2
m
(2.2.50)
m
dk
= P m + k ex + k u
u
dt
m
(2.2.51)
An extension of the K-k model can be found in [C5]. This model is implemented as the
Revised K-k Model in Boost.
2-26
dK
1
1
2
2
= cin m in u in + cex m ex u ex P + K ex + K u
m
dt
u
2
(2.2.52)
dk
= P m + k ex + k u
m
dt
u
(2.2.53)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
There are several differences in the definitions used in the above equations which are
summarized in the following table:
Standard K-k Model
Production Term P
K
u'
LI
P = cP
P = cP
with
with
c P = 0.3307 ct
Dissipation Term
K
U f
LI
c P = 0.064
3
2
u '3
LI
u '3
LI
Exhaust:
u '3
=
lk
Integral Length Scale
LI
LI = cl
K=
LI = cl 3 Vcyl
Vcyl
A
1
3
m U 2f , k = m u 2
2
2
(2.2.54)
whose production and destruction is mainly related to the intake and exhaust flow rates
in and m ex ) - k is the kinetic energy of the turbulent flow field (assumed isotropic)
(m
lk =
LI
Ret3 / 4
with
Ret =
u LI
(2.2.55)
15-Nov-2013
2-27
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
2.35u + 2.05S L
u + S L
(2.2.56)
The above described fractal model is indeed really valid for a fully-developed and freely
expanding turbulent flame. During both early flame development and combustion
completion correction terms (weight factors w1 and w2 described below) are required.
Ignition
The complex phenomena occurring after spark occurrence, plasma formation and
subsequent flame kernel evolution are described in detail in [C24]. Kernel initiation
process ends about 200 ms (tunable with the ignition-formation time multiplier cign ) after
spark at a critical flame radius of about 2 mm. During this period burning speed is very
high, depending on energy released by the ignition system, then it reaches a minimum to
values similar to the laminar flame speed [C16] and subsequently it increases again, as a
consequence of the flame surface wrinkling previously described.
Being the above phenomena not included in the present model, it is assumed to start the
computation at the end of kernel initiation process with a stable and spherically-shaped
smooth flame of about 2 mm radius. Flame wrinkling process then starts at a rate which
increases with both the instantaneous flame radius and the turbulence intensity
(proportional to the engine speed). The following expression is proposed for the
computation of a non-dimensional flame wrinkling rate:
wr =
In the above equation,
rf
rf , ref
n
nref
(2.2.57)
nref is a reference engine speed fixed to 1000 rpm. Equation 2.2.56 is finally redefined to
handle an increase in the fractal dimension related to the gradual increase in flame
wrinkling during time.
D3 =
With this formulation, the first phase of the combustion process will be characterized by a
fractal dimension very close to its minimum level D3, min , which determines an initial
burning speed close to the laminar one. Note that the minimum value of the fractal
dimension is in any case greater than 2.
This should compensate the very high burning speed which occurs during the kernel
formation phase, due to the energy supplied with the spark plug.
2-28
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
m mb
dmb
=
dt wall combustion
(2.2.58)
The overall burning rate can be consequently defined as a weighted mean of the two
described combustion rates:
dmb
dm
dm
= (1 w2 ) b
+ w2 b
dt overall
dt fractals
dt wall combustion
(2.2.59)
The switch between the two combustion modes gradually starts when a transition time
t tr
is reached, identifying the first flame plume arrival to the cylinder wall, i.e.:
rf =
rf
(m mb ) tr
( u AT S L ) tr
(2.2.60)
rcyl
LI /2
15-Nov-2013
2-29
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
When Equation 2.2.60 is verified, the characteristic time scale in Equation 2.2.58 is
computed assuming that wall-combustion burning rate equals the one derived from the
fractal model Equation 2.2.49, hence:
(m mb ) tr
( u AT S L ) tr
=
The above
(2.2.61)
value is then kept fixed during the subsequent wall combustion process. The
m mb
(m mb ) tr
(2.2.62)
In this way a smooth transition between the two modes is easily realized.
Stratified Charge
The underlying spatial discretization of the fractal combustion model considers cylinder
mixture in two zones: burned and unburned zone. The stratified charge extension takes
into account a 1-dimensional spatial distribution of fuel and residual gas in the unburned
zone. The local fuel and residual gas concentration in the flame front during the
combustion progress used fort e simulation is defined by characteristic normalized values.
x cp
flame inside the flame front zone are calculated as
follows:
flame =
afrst
afrst
SOC
+1
NORM mfbC
2-30
(2.2.63)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
cp
cp
x cp
flame = x NORM mfbC xSOC
(2.2.64)
SOC
cp
xSOC
mfbC
NORM mfbC
cp
x NORM
mfbC
afrst
mfbC
mfbC
Normalized data of air equivalence ratio and residual gas ratio can be obtained by CFD
calculations either
SOC
cp
at Start of
xSOC
Combustion:
x
SOC = afrst
fv
dV
VC
(1 x
cp
fv
) dV
(2.2.65)
VC
x
cp
=
xSOC
VC
cp
dV
dV
(2.2.66)
VC
x cp
x fv
cp
NORM
cp
mfbC and x NORM
mfbC are:
mfbC d (mfbC ) = 1
(2.2.67)
15-Nov-2013
2-31
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
NORM
cp
cp
cp
mfbC 1 xNORM
mfbC xSOC
d (mfbC ) = 1 xSOC
(2.2.68)
vct2
dmct
2
= mc
2 dt
dt
R12 hb + R22 hcl
vct =
dm
1
ct
c Act dt
Et ,sq
C squish
Squish constant
vct
dmct
dt
mc
ds
dt
Piston velocity
R1 =
2-32
db
2
(2.2.69)
(2.2.70)
(2.2.71)
db
R2
hb
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
hcl
Act
i dI i + j dI j C sf
+
i d ; i, j = 1,2 ; i j
di =
2
Ii
Ii
C sf
Crank angle
(2.2.72)
Vi
Vi
dEt ,sw =
1
C swirl C sf I1 12 d
2
Et ,sw
C swirl
Swirl constant
15-Nov-2013
(2.2.73)
2-33
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
V1 can be
finally written as
dk =
dV
1
k 3/ 2
2
dEt ,sq + dEt ,sw C D
dt CC k c
m1
hcl
3
Vc
m1
CD
k b3 / 2
hcl
(2.2.74)
Turbulence dissipation
Dissipation constant
CD
dV
2
CC k c
3
Vc
CC
Compression constant
Vc
Cylinder volume
k SHP
2-34
C
= TL
2
D2
n S
2d h
v
v ,max cos( v ) 30
CTL
Engine speed
Stroke
dv
hv,max
(2.2.75)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
AId
IGN
rAr =
rAr
rMag = AMag
Ignition time
SOC
AId
AAr
Arrhenius constant
cF
cO2
pc
p0
Tc
AMag
Magnussen constant
15-Nov-2013
(2.2.76)
rMag
p
c
p0
IGN
d 1
0.2
3000
exp
T
c
mF k
0 Vc4 / 3
(2.2.77)
(2.2.78)
2-35
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
mF
Vc
Cylinder volume
H
dQ F
k
= C ROHR
m F ,av u
3V
d
d
c
dt
dQ F
d
C ROHR
3V
c
m F ,av
Hu
d
dt
(2.2.79)
During the first combustion period, where the flame front is able to propagate freely
without wall interaction the available fuel mass is given by the volume of the flame.
m F ,av = m F , f = 2 r ff2 s
mF , f
r ff
Flame thickness
(2.2.80)
The development of the flame radius is driven by the turbulent flame speed. Its
dependency on turbulence, excess air ratio, temperature and pressure is modeled according
to Glder [C14],[C15].
vturb =
2-36
0.5
vlam
vturb
vlam
2
k
3
0.375
3V
u
0.25
(2.2.81)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
vlam = 2.2 10
2
0.565175
F
6.44427 10 3 Tu
exp
T
T
f
Tf =
Tb T f
Tb Tu
23.873 10 3
p
ln
12
31.557 10
vlam
Tu
Tb
Tf
2.5158
(2.2.82)
(2.2.83)
For the consideration of effects occurring at the later combustion phase when the flame
reaches the cylinder wall a modification for the available fuel mass is introduced. The
weighting of this modification can be steered by the 2 parameters PT and T of the flame
front combustion weight function.
m F ,av = FC m F , f + (1 FC ) m F ,ub
FC
m F ,ub
15-Nov-2013
(2.2.84)
2-37
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
(2.2.85)
dQMCC
= C Comb f1 (m F , QMCC ) f 2 (k , V )
d
(2.2.86)
C
f1 (m F , Q ) = m F MCC (wOxygen,available ) EGR
LCV
(2.2.87)
with
f 2 (k , V ) = C Rate 3
(2.2.88)
QMCC cumulative heat release for the mixture controlled combustion [kJ]
C Comb combustion constant [kJ/kg/deg CA]
2-38
C Rate
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
mF
wOxygen,available mass fraction of available Oxygen (aspirated and in EGR) at SOI [-]
C EGR
dE kin
1.5
= 0.5 C turb m F v F2 C Diss E kin
dt
k=
E kin
m F , I (1 + Diff m stoich )
(2.2.89)
(2.2.90)
dE kin
= 0.5 m F v F2 C Diss E kin
dt
k=
C turb E kin
m F , I (1 + Diff m stoich )
Ekin
CTurb
C Diss
m F , I
injection velocity =
m stoich
15-Nov-2013
(2.2.91)
(2.2.92)
m F
[m/s]
F A
2-39
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
Diff
time [s]
dI id TUB Tref
=
d
f id Qref
(2.2.93)
iD
is calculated from
id
I id
Tref
TUB
Qref
id
SOI
id
f id
dQ
PMC
QPMC
d
= a (m + 1) y m e a y (m +1)
c
y=
2-40
id
c
(2.2.94)
(2.2.95)
QPMC
m fuel ,id
C PMC
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
id C PMC Dur
C PMC Dur
c (Tc Td ) =
30.93 10 4
Td
pc
4150.0
(2.2.96)
e
(20.0 + 0.26 (Td 273.15) + 0.3 (Tc 273.15))
Using the equilibrium temperature the velocity of the evaporation results from:
ve = 0.70353
Td
pc e
4159.0
T
d
(2.2.97)
The value of 0.70353 can be changed through user input (expert parameters). Finally the
change in droplet diameter (and the corresponding change in droplet mass) over time can
be calculated:
d d = d d2, 0 ve t
Tc
Td
pc
ve
dd
d d ,0
(2.2.98)
15-Nov-2013
2-41
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
The model subdivides the spray into a high number of zones. In each zone the mechanisms
of charge entrainment, evaporation, ignition delay, and combustion are calculated by
different sub-models.
During injection, at certain increments new packages of zones are generated. Each package
is subdivided into a number of radial zones. Consequently, the overall number of zones,
which is generated during the combustion process, depends on the duration of injection,
the calculation time-step and the discretization in radial direction.
vinj = cD
vtip ,c
2.95 p
2 ch
2 p
fuel
0.25
0.5
d inj
t 0.5 f rad f ax
vinj
mi = minj 1 +
1 C Entrain
vtip
2-42
(2.2.99)
vinj
vtip ,c
cD
fuel
ch
d inj
(2.2.100)
(2.2.101)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
minj
mi
C Entrain
f rad , f ax
correction functions to account for radial / axial position in the spray [-]
The velocity of the spray decreases from the spray centerline to the spray border since
there is a stronger interaction between the fuel package and the cylinder charge at the
spray periphery. An exponential decrease in radial direction was assumed in [C17],
expressed by the correction function f rad . Here irad represents the radial position of the
package in the spray. The velocity of the outer radial zones has half the value of the zones
on the spray centerline which defines the parameter C rad .
2
f rad = e [Crad (irad 1) ]
C rad =
nr
irad
(2.2.102)
ln(0.5)
(nr 1) 2
(2.2.103)
During fuel injection, the flow field within the combustion chamber is affected by the
momentum of the spray. This leads to a slipstream effect for the later injected packages.
This effect is considered by a correction function f ax depending on the axial position of the
zone iax , that is given in [C32].
f ax
i 1 C2 t
inj
= C1 1 + ax
C3
i ax , max 1
tinj
iax
iax ,max
C1 , C 2 , C3
(2.2.104)
(dm
fv
dt )
Tl >Tcr
(dm
fv
dt )
Tl <Tcr
and
the model to measurements; one that controls the heat up of the droplet C eht and one that
controls the evaporation rate C Evap .
15-Nov-2013
2-43
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
0 .44
fuel
12.392 d inj
SMDtb =
0 .42
( fuel fuel )
p 0 .42 ch
0 .28
0 .28
(2.2.105)
z
q = C eht SMD m (Ti Tl ) Nu z
e 1
dm fv
dt
= C Evap SMD Dv Sh
Tl <Tcr
dm fv
dt
SMDtb , SMD
q
= C Evap
Tl >Tcr
p
p
ln
R Tm
p ps
p
C1 SMD
6
(2.2.106)
(2.2.107)
C2
(2.2.108)
dm fv
dt
Tcr
Ti , Tl , Tm
Nu
Sh
fuel , m ,
Dv , z , p s
C1 , C 2
C eht
C Evap
= C IgnDel p 1.02 e
inj +
inj
2-44
TIgnDel
(2.2.109)
dt 1
(2.2.110)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
TIgnDel
C IgnDel
C IgnExp
Combustion
The heat release in the zones
Jung [C21]. Herein the educts concentrations are expressed by the mass fractions of fuel
vapor and oxygen. The reaction term is an equation of the Arrhenius type which
additionally considers the density in the pre-exponential term.
dx fb
dt
dx fb
dt
dx fb
dt
= K b ch x fv xo2
1.5
= K b ch x fv xo2
a
1200
Ti
(2.2.111)
bO 2
carrh
Ti
(2.2.112)
x fv
x o2
Kb
15-Nov-2013
2-45
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
dqZtoCh
= ht Ai (Ti Tch )
dt
dq ZtoCh
dt
ht
Ai
(2.2.113)
2-46
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
dQF
in Equation 2.2.1 is formulated as:
d
dQ F nSpcGas
= u i MWi i
d
i =1
(2.2.114)
dwi
= MWi i
d
(2.2.115)
where:
nSpcGas
MW
The reaction rate of each species is calculated based on a specified set of chemical
reactions that describe the auto-ignition process.
15-Nov-2013
2-47
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
dQ j
dt
is constituted of:
dQ F , j
dt
QF
u ij
MW
i
j
nSpcGas
2-48
nSpcGas
uij MWi ij
i =1
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
dT j
dt
1
c p, j
nSpcGas
1 dQ j
dR j R j T j dpc
Tj
+
v j u ij MWi ij (2.2.116)
dt
pc
dt
i =1
m j dt
Qj
temperature [K]
cp
mj
mass [kg]
Rj
pc
In each zone a different gas composition is calculated, therefore a mass fraction of each
species in each zone has to be calculated with:
d ij
dt
= MWi v j ij
(2.2.117)
Since the zones are connected by the fact that the pressure in all zones is the same there is
an additional equation which enables the calculation of term
dpc
in (2.2.116):
dt
nZones
dT j
dR j
dpc nZones
dV
Vc
m j R j
= j m j T j
pc c
dt
dt
dt
dt
j =1
i =1
nZones
15-Nov-2013
(2.2.118)
number of zones
2-49
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
dQ j
dt
transfer. Wall heat transfer is calculated only for the boundary layer zones. It is calculated
in the same manner as the general in cylinder wall heat transfer, with the exception that
in equation 2.2.11 a gas temperature of each boundary layer zone is used instead of mean
cylinder temperature.
Zone heat transfer is calculated between several zones, which is shown in Figure 2-17:
Description of 6 Zones and their Interaction. Heat transfer between two zones (x, y) is
calculated with:
dQ x y
dt
Q x y
Qx y
Tx y
Q x y
(2.2.119)
Q x y = u y Tx y u y T y m y
( )
(2.2.120)
zone y in order for it to change its temperature to the temperature of the mixture
Tx y .
Time constant t which in some way represent a speed of this heat exchange is a
calibration factor of this calculation and has to be specified by the user. Increase of time
constant lead to lower rate of heat exchange, and a greater difference in zone
temperatures.
2-50
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
Combustion Model
In homogeneous charge spark ignited engines, the progression of the flame front is
governed by the turbulent flame speed vturb, which is calculated on the basis of the laminar
flamespeed vlam, and the level of instantaneous turbulent kinetic energy in the unburned
zone k. Analogously to the open chamber gas engine, the correlation of Glder [C15] is
used, where vu is the kinematic viscosity of the unburned zone.
vturb
2
= vlam k
3
0.75
3 V
u
0.5
(2.2.121)
The laminar flame speed vlam is calculated according to Peters et al. [C13]. The correlation
uses the theoretical combustion temperature as a function on the unburned zone state.
This temperature can be calculated from the energy equation using actual fuel- and
working gas properties.
Mller et al. [C26] have introduced a polynomial correlation for the adiabatic combustion
temperature as a function of the unburned zone conditions: temperature Tub and air excess
ratio ub. The correlation shows a good agreement with the thermodynamic approach only
at lambda > 1.
(2.2.122)
15-Nov-2013
(2.2.123)
2-51
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
= C turb , pc
vd2
2
dmori
dt
(2.2.124)
The heat release in the pre-chamber is calculated according to the Magnussen formulation
given in equation 2.2.126. For the calculation of the flame front volume VFF a hemispherical flame shape is assumed. The flame front thickness is a fixed value of 3mm. The
flame radius is calculated by integration of the turbulent flame speed.
The ignition delay time is calculated by an Arrhenius type correlation. Ignition occurs,
when the integration of the reciprocal ignition delay time exceeds a threshold value of 1.
= 4.3 10 4 p pre 0 .5 e
3000
T
(2.2.125)
The relevant concentration for the Magnussen formulation is calculated from the fuel mass
in the flame front. The correction term CP represents the combustion product
concentration and is calculated using equation 2.2.127, where c, h and o represent the fuel
mass fractions of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen.
dQ pre
dt
k pre
m fuel , pre
= C comb, pre H u V FF
CP
3 V
V pre
pre
(2.2.126)
44
32
c +
h
12
4
CP =
32
32
1+
c +
ho
12
4
2-52
(2.2.127)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
dk cyl
dt
dk squi
dt
dt
dt
dt
dt
dk ori
dm v
1
= C turb ,ori ori ori
dt
dt
2
mcyl
(2.2.128)
(2.2.129)
In the main cylinder combustion starts just before the flame front radius in the prechamber Rf exceeds the chamber length lPC. This is usually the case before the combustion
in the pre-chamber is completed. The parameter Cign allows a calibration of the combustion
start in the cylinder. Thus, ignition occurs when condition 2.2.130 is fulfilled.
Rf
l PC
Cign
(2.2.130)
The heat release in the main cylinder is divided in two regimes dQcyl,I and dQcyl,II.
Therefore, the overall available fuel is divided into two pools. The partitioning between the
two pools is an input parameter to the model. Each pool is balanced separately, also
accounting for the fuel flow between pre-chamber and main chamber. The overall heat
release sums up from the two heat release phases, as expressed by equation 2.2.131.
dQcyl
dt
dQcyl , I
dt
dQcyl , II
(2.2.131)
dt
The first heat release phase one is driven by the inflowing flame jets from the pre-chamber.
The heat release rate follows a Magnussen formulation according to equation 2.2.132.
Herein, kspray is calculated according to equation 2.2.133.
dQcyl , I
dt
= C comb, I H u m fuel , I
k spray =
k spray
3
(2.2.132)
Vcyl
v
dm
1
ori ori d
2 mcyl soc 2
d
(2.2.133)
The second heat release phase is also described by a Magnussen approach defined by
equation 2.2.134. The available fuel mass is calculated in the flame front volume as a
function of flame surface Aflame and fuel density mfuel,II/Vcyl. CP is again calculated according
to equation 2.2.127.
dQcyl , II
dt
k cyl
m fuel , II
= C comb, II H u A flame s ff
CP
3 V
V
cyl
cyl
(2.2.134)
In the initial phase the flame surface is described assuming (semi-)spherical shape. For the
estimation of the piston distance spi, a flat piston geometry is assumed, as shown in Figure
2-20. When the flame reaches the piston surface, the flame surface is calculated assuming
an equivalent spherical layer which has the same volume as the theoretical semispherical
flame (Veq=Vf). The equivalent radius Req is expressed by equation 2.2.135.
15-Nov-2013
2-53
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
Req =
Vf
s pi
s pi
(2.2.135)
Further, the flame surface is composed from the surface of the spherical layer and the
flame area on the piston surface:
(2.2.136)
spherical layer
piston
Cylinder Temperature.
2-54
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
If the pressure at the end of the compression stroke already exceeds the specified PFP,
combustion starts when the pressure drops below this pressure during the expansion
stroke.
Rate
k i = k 0 ,i T e
a
k0 [cm3,mol,s]
a [-]
TA [K]
TAi
R1
N2 + O = NO + N
r1 = k1 c N 2 cO
4.93E13
0.0472
38048.01
R2
O2 +N = NO + O
r2 = k 2 cO 2 c N
1.48E08
1.5
2859.01
R3
N +OH = NO + H
r3 = k3 cOH c N
4.22E13
0.0
0.0
R4
N2O + O = NO + NO
r4 = k 4 c N 2O cO
4.58E13
0.0
12130.6
R5
O2 + N2 = N2O + O
r5 = k5 cO 2 c N 2
2.25E10
0.825
50569.7
R6
OH + N2 = N2O + H
r6 = k 2 cOH c N 2
9.14E07
1.148
36190.66
All reactions rates ri have units [mole/cm3s] the concentrations ci are molar concentrations
under equilibrium conditions with units [mole/cm3]. The concentration of N2O is calculated
according to:
6
c N 2O = 1.1802 10 T
0.6125
9471.6
c N 2 pO 2
15-Nov-2013
2-55
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
r1
r4
(2.2.137)
with:
c NO ,act
AK 2 =
c NO ,equ C KineticMult
r1
r2 + r3
AK 4 =
r4
r5 + r6
Rate
R1
CO + OH = CO2 + H
R2
CO +O2 = CO2 + O
r1 = 6.76 10 e
10
1102.0
r2 = 2.51 10 e
12
cCO cOH
24055.0
cCO cO 2
cCO , act
cCO ,equ
(2.2.138)
dms , f
dt
n1
= As , f
s, f
dm fb , diff p
Rm T
e
p
dt
ref
p
dms , o
1
n2
= As , o
(msoot ) O2
pO , ref
char
dt
2
2-56
n3
(2.2.139)
s ,o
R
m
e T
(2.2.140)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
dm s, f
dt
dm s,o
dt
dm fb,diff
dt
p, pref
E sf , E so
msoot
As , f
As ,o
char
n1 , n2 , n3
Hiroyasu et al.
The Soot model used for the Multi-Zone Combustion Model is based on Hiroyasu et al.
[C17]. In the model, soot formation is directly attributed to the presence of fuel vapor. The
oxidation reaction is governed by the net soot mass and the available oxygen in the
reaction zone. These two reactions take place simultaneously, the actual soot mass results
from the difference of soot formation and oxidation rate.
dms , f
dt
dm s ,o
dt
dm s, f
dt
dm s,o
dt
= C s , f m fv p
= C s ,o m soot
0.5
Esf
Rm T
(2.2.141)
p O2
p
1. 8
E sc
Rm T
(2.2.142)
E sf , E so
p O2
msoot
C s, f
C s ,o
15-Nov-2013
2-57
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
A fraction of the charge enters the crevice volumes and is not burned since the
flame quenches at the entrance.
2.
Fuel vapor is absorbed into the oil layer and deposits on the cylinder wall during
intake and compression. The following desorption takes place when the cylinder
pressure decreases during the expansion stroke and complete combustion cannot
take place any more.
3.
Quench layers on the combustion chamber wall which are left as the flame
extinguishes prior to reaching the walls.
4.
5.
Direct flow of fuel vapor into the exhaust system during valve overlap in PFI
engines.
The first two mechanisms and in particular the crevice formation are considered to be the
most important and need to be accounted for in a thermodynamic model. Quench layer and
partial burn effect cannot be physically described in a quasi dimensional approach, but
may be included by adopting tunable semiempirical correlations.
The effect of through flow is taken into account automatically as all chemical species are
transported through all elements.
(a) Crevice mechanism
Crevices are narrow volumes in which the flame cannot propagate due to the heat
transferred to the walls. The most important crevice volumes are the formed between the
piston ring pack and the cylinder liner, and mainly the top-land crevices.
These crevice volumes cause hydrocarbon formation due to the following process. During
compression unburned mixture is forced to enter their volumes, which have a large
surface/volume ratio, and cools exchanging heat transfer with the walls. During
combustion, the pressure continues to rise and forces other unburned mixture to flow into
the crevice volumes. When the flame arrives it quenches, so that the flow through the
crevice entrance inverts its motion when the cylinder pressure starts to decrease.
To describe this process, the model assumes that the pressure in the cylinder and in the
crevices is the same and that the temperature of the mass in the crevice volumes is equal
to the piston temperature. The mass in the crevices at any time is equal to:
mcrevice =
2-58
p Vcrevice M
R T piston
(2.2.143)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
where:
mcrevice
Vcrevice
Tpiston
As we are interested in the evaluation of the HCs going into the exhaust BOOST begins to
accumulate the HCs that are released from the crevice volume at end of combustion.
(b) HC absorption/desorption mechanism
A second significant source of hydrocarbon is the presence of lubricating oil in the fuel or
on the walls of the combustion chamber. In fact, during compression, the fuel vapor
pressure increases so, by Henrys law, absorption occurs even if the oil was saturated
during the intake. During combustion the fuel vapor concentration in the burned gases
goes to zero so the absorbed fuel vapor will desorb from the liquid oil into the burned
gases. Fuel solubility is a positive function of the molecular weight, so the oil layer
contributed to HC emissions depending on the different solubility of individual
hydrocarbons in the lubricating oil. As a consequence, for usual gaseous fuels as methane
and propane, due to the low molecular weight, oil mechanism does not contribute
significantly.
The assumptions made in the development of the HC absorption/desorption are the
following:
diffusion of the fuel in the oil film is the limiting factor, since the diffusion
constant in the liquid phase is 104 times smaller than the corresponding value in
the gas phase.
Under these hypotheses the radial distribution of the fuel mass fraction in the oil film can
be determined by solving the diffusion equation:
wF
2 wF
D
=0
t
r 2
(2.2.144)
where:
wF
time, [s]
15-Nov-2013
2-59
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
radial position in the oil film (distance from the wall), [m]
In order to solve Equation 2.2.144 the oil layer can be represented as a cylindrical crown
adhering to the walls. The resulting calculation domain is then obtained by subdividing the
cylindrical crown into a fixed number of elements in both axial and radial directions.
The diffusion coefficient can be computed applying the following relation:
(2.2.145)
where:
vf
At the liner surface (r=0) a zero flux boundary conditions is applied to Equation 2.2.144, at
r=Film the fuel concentration at the gas/oil interface is assigned as boundary condition.
Here the following four different conditions can occur:
1) the oil layer is in contact with the fresh mixture
2) the oil layer is in contact with the burned gas
3) the oil layer is in contact with the crankcase gas
4) the oil layer is in contact with the piston layer
BOOST evaluates the position of the flame front at every time-step and accumulates only
HCs that are desorbed into the burned gases, since any HC released into the unburned
mixture would be burned by the propagating flame front.
(c) Partial burn effects
Quench layer and partial burn effects cannot be physically described in a quasidimensional approach. A possible semi-empirical correlation has been proposed by Lavoie
et al. [C23], in which the fraction of unburned charge remaining in the cylinder Fprob is
calculated applying the following equation which relates Fprob to the global burn rate
parameters:
C1 = 0.0032 + ( 1) 22
C1 = 0.003 + (( 1) 1.1)
<1
4
>1
(2.2.146)
C 2 = 0.35
where:
2-60
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
90
EVO
dC HC
T
= FOx f AOx exp Ox C O 2 C HC
dt
T
(2.2.147)
where:
C
FOx
TOx
AOx
Figure 2-21: State Variables and Fluxes in a Burned Zone Stratification Model
15-Nov-2013
2-61
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
It is well known that mixture which burns early in the combustion process is further
compressed after combustion as the remainder charge is burned. On the contrary, mixture
which burns late is compressed prior to combustion and therefore ends up at a different
initial state. Typically temperature differences of about 100-200 K have been reported
between the first and last burned regions. Neglecting this effect by using a standard two
zone model can result in a significant under-prediction of the CO and NOx emissions.
The burned zone stratification model splits the 'average' burned zone in to a total number
of Z stratified zones. It assumes that each zone, except the last zone (the currently burning
zone), has the same constant amount of mass. The mass of the last zone results from:
Z
mb = m z
(2.2.148)
z =1
The model assumes that there is no mass exchange between the zones. Each zone is
spherical with its center located on the spark plug position. Furthermore, each zone
exchanges heat with the cylinder walls according to the respective wetted area.
For all burned zones except the last the temperature is calculated from:
d (m z hz )
dp
= q z + V
dt
dt
(2.2.149)
The temperature in the last burned zone results from a global energy balance in the
burned zone, expressed by equation 2.2.150. This ensures that the global conservation of
mass and energy in the cylinder is not violated.
Z
mb hb = m z hz
(2.2.150)
z =1
(t )dt
iD
(2.2.151)
iD
ignition delay at the unburned zones condition is larger than one before the end
of combustion is reached.
The ignition delay for the knock model depends on the octane number of the fuel and the
gas condition according to
a
ON
n
p eT
100
iD = A
2-62
(2.2.152)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
iD
ON
pressure [atm]
temperature [K]
A, a, n, B
model constants
A = 17.68 ms
a =3.402
n =1.7
B =3800 K
n sw (t + t ) =
nsw
in-cylinder swirl
mc
in-cylinder mass
dmi
in-flowing mass
nswi
1
(mc (t ) n sw (t ) + dmi n swi )
mc (t + t )
(2.2.153)
With reference to the inflow situation of a steady state swirl test rig, the characteristic
instantaneous swirl value entering the cylinder nswi together with the inflow mass dmi is
nswi =
Vi
VD
cylinder displacement
engine speed
nswr
15-Nov-2013
Vi nswr
VD 2 n
(2.2.154)
2-63
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
ntb (t + t ) =
1
(mc (t ) ntb (t ) + dmi ntbi )
mc (t + t )
ntb
in-cylinder tumble
mc
in-cylinder mass
dmi
in-flowing mass
ntbi
(2.2.155)
With reference to the inflow situation of a steady state tumble test rig, the characteristic
instantaneous tumble value entering the cylinder ntbi together with the inflow mass dmi is
ntbi =
Vi
VD
cylinder displacement
engine speed
ntbr
Vi ntbr
VD 2 n
(2.2.156)
dT d 2T
=
dt c dx 2
T
2-64
(2.2.157)
wall temperature
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
qin =
dT
dx
(2.2.158)
qin
CM
TWO
TCM
(2.2.159)
For the piston, another term for the heat flux to the liner is taken into account.
dm
d (mc u )
dQ
dV dQF
dm
= pC
+
w hBB BB + hcp cp
d
d d
d
d
d
hcp
dmcp
d
(2.2.160)
The concentration changes due to the flows from the chamber are:
Ci +1 / CP
+1
+1
dmCP
mC
in the Cylinder
Similar extensions must be made in the energy Equation for the gas exchange.
15-Nov-2013
2-65
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
p0
dm
2 p1 p1
= cD A
dt
1 p 0
R0 T0
p0
cD
flow coefficient
p 0 , T0 , R0
p1
w
L
t
+1
p
1 2 w L
p 0 R0 T0 t
(2.2.161)
COMBUSTION CHAMBER
The combustion chamber is treated as a plenum. Heat release, wall heat losses, volume
work and mass flows out of or into the plenum are accounted for (refer to Section 2.3).
With the addition of a term for the heat released due to combustion, Equation 2.3.1
becomes:
d (mPl u )
dQ
dm h
dm h
dQB
dV
= p PL
w +
+ i i e e
d
d
d
d
d
d
(2.2.162)
w = 130 L
0.2
p pre
0.8
C1
= 2.28
C2
= 0.00473
characteristic length
cchar
characteristic velocity
T pre
0.53
T
C1 cchar + C 2 c ,1 ( p pre pc ,o )
pc ,1
0.8
(2.2.163)
p c ,o
2-66
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
Tc ,1
pc ,1
d (m Pl u )
dQ
dm
dm
dQreac
dV
= p Pl
w + i hi e he +
d
d
d
d
d
d
mPl
pPl
plenum volume
Qw
crank angle
dmi
dme
hi
he
Qreac
(2.3.1)
In a General Species Transport calculation chemical reactions can occur in the plenum. In
this case the term
dQreac
and the species mass fractions in the plenum are calculated as
d
Heat Transfer:
BOOST offers two options for the calculation of the gas/wall heat transfer:
(1) direct specification of the heat transfer coefficient
(2) model based specification of the heat transfer coefficient
= 0.018
Ro uch0.8 Lch
0.2
(2.3.2)
Lch = 3 V
15-Nov-2013
2-67
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
u ch =
Lch
characteristic length
plenum volume
uch
characteristic velocity
u pipe
Apipe
1
u pipe 2
n n
Lch
Ro
gas constant
Please refer to section 2.2.7 for details on the plenum variable heat transfer model.
2.4. Pipe
2.4.1. Conservation Equations
The set of conservation equations to describe a one-dimensional pipe flow is given by the
well known Euler Equation:
U F(U)
= S(U)
+
x
t
Where
U=
1
2
cV T + 2 u
wj
and
(2.4.2)
2
u + p
F=
u ( E + p )
u w
j
2-68
(2.4.1)
(2.4.3)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
with
E = cV T +
1
u2
2
(2.4.4)
The source term on the right hand side comprises two different source terms:
(2.4.5)
These are sources caused by axial changes in the pipe cross section
1 dA
p
SA (F(U)) = F +
0
A dx
(2.4.6)
and sources taking into account homogeneous chemical reactions, heat and mass transfer
terms between the gas and solid phase and friction sources. The entire source term is given
by
FR
qw
S R (U) =
Rhom
MW j i . j ri
i
(2.4.7)
Please refer to the following sub-sections for details on the definition of the different
source terms and for details on the solution mechanism.
f
FR
=
u u
2 d hyd
V
f:
(2.4.8)
The factor is called Fanning friction factor and takes into account deviations from round
channel cross sections. It has values as summarized in Table 21.
15-Nov-2013
2-69
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
Round
1.00
Square
0.89
Equilateral Triangle
0.83
0.69
Re =
d hyd u
(2.4.9)
Re Relam
| f = f ,lam
Returb Re
| f = f ,turb
(2.4.10)
Re Relam
Re Relam
+ f ,turb
f ,lam = a Reb
a = 64
b = 1,
(2.4.11)
where a is an input value. For gas-exchange simulation b=-1 according to the HagenPoisseuille-Law for laminar tube flow and cannot be modified by the user.
The gas dynamic viscosity is only a function of temperature,
1.5
383.15
T
v = 17.1e 6 *
*
(T + 110.4)
273.15
2-70
(2.4.12)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
p =
v 2
2
(2.4.13)
This loss coefficient is a function of the bend angle and the ratio between the bend radius
and the pipe diameter. For this reason the variation of bend radius over pipe length must
be specified. The bend radius is defined as the bend radius of the pipe centerline.
r
Figure 2-23: Pipe Bend Parameters
15-Nov-2013
2-71
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
Nu =
gw d hyd
g
(2.4.14)
Based on Lienhard and Lienhard [P3] BOOST offers the following approaches for the
definition of the Nusselt number:
Re-Analogy:
Nu =
d hyd 0.019
u cp
g
2
(2.4.15)
Colburn:
2-72
(2.4.16)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
Pethukov:
f
Re Pr
8
Nu =
2
f
1.07 + 12.7 Pr 3 1
8
f =
(2.4.17)
1
(1.82 log10 Re 1.64)2
Gnielinski:
f
(Re 1000) Pr
8
Nu =
2
f
1 + 12.7 Pr 3 1
(2.4.18)
Nu = Nu FP FB
(2.4.19)
FB =1+
where
21 d hyd
,
Re 0.14 d B
(2.4.20)
x
u+a
(2.4.21)
This means that a certain relation between the time step and the lengths of the cells must
be met. BOOST determines the time step to cell size relation at the beginning of the
calculation on the basis of the specified initial conditions in the pipes. However, the CFL
criterion is checked every time step during the calculation.
15-Nov-2013
2-73
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
If the criterion is not met because of significantly changed flow conditions in the pipes, the
time step is reduced automatically.
An ENO scheme [P1, P2] is used for the solution of the set of non-linear differential
equations discussed above. The ENO scheme is based on a finite volume approach. This
means that the solution at the end of the time step is obtained from the value at the
beginning of the time step and from the fluxes over the cell borders:
2-74
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
Figure 2-28: Main transport effects in a pipe consisting of different wall layers
15-Nov-2013
2-75
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
(Tw l ,w c p,l ,w )= + l ,w Tw + 1 r l ,w Tw ,
t
x
x r r
r
(2.4.22)
where
Tw is the temperature of the catalyst wall. r and x represent the radial and axial
coordinates, respectively. Wall density l ,w , wall heat capacity c p ,l ,w and its thermal
conductivity
l ,w
are given within the time and space derivatives in order to consider their
dependency of the temperature. All three properties are marked with the index l to
distinguish between the properties of different wall layers as sketched in Figure 2-27.
The boundary conditions of the 2D heat conduction field are given by
Tw
=0
x
Tw
=0
x
@ x=0,
(2.4.23)
@ x = L pipe ,
(2.4.24)
Tw gw
=
(Tg Tw )
r l ,w
@ r = rgw ,
Tw wa
4
=
(Tw Tamb ) + O Tw4 Trad
l ,w
r l ,w
where
gw
and
wa
@ r = rwa ,
(2.4.25)
(2.4.26)
represent the heat transfer coefficients between gas and wall and
represents the emissivity of the outer surface of the outermost wall layer and is the
Stefan-Boltzmann constant. According to Eq. (2.4.22) and Eq. (2.4.23) no heat losses in
axial direction are assumed. At the wall inner side (Eq. 2.4.24) a boundary heat flux is
given by convective heat transfer between the gas and wall. At the outer surface of the pipe
wall (Eq. 2.4.25) convective and radiative heat transfer to the ambient are taken into
account.
Air-Gaps
If i.e. air-gaps are part of the model it is additionally necessary to consider radiative heat
transfer between the opaque walls neighboring a transparent layer. This radiative heat
exchange, taken from [P5], is evaluated according to
o i Ao oi Tw4,o Tw4,i
,
Qoi =
1 (1 o ) (1 i ) oi io
2-76
(2.4.27)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
where
and
inner layer and at the inner surface of the outer layer, respectively.
Ao of the
oi ( io ) is the viewing
factor from the outer (inner) side of the inner (outer) layer to the inner (outer) side of the
inner (outer) layer. Both viewing factors are evaluated according to [P5] assuming finite
length coaxial cylinders.
The conductive/radiative heat transfer within air-gaps is typically augmented by free
convection. Therefore an effective heat conductivity taken from Wilde [P7] is applied in the
model. It is given by
eff
(Gr Prair )
= 1 + 0.0119
air
14500 + Gr Prair
where the effective heat conductivity
eff
(2.4.28)
Gr =
where
g 3 air
(Tw,o Tw,i ) ,
2
vair
(2.4.29)
air
(temperature
dependent data were taken from Verein Deutscher Ingenieure [P5] represents the isobar
expansion coefficient of air and vair is its kinematic viscosity.
Wall-ambient heat transfer:
The external heat transfer model applies Nusselt approaches for cross-flow take from VDI
[P5]. The correlation considers free and forced convection. It is given by:
(2.4.30)
Please refer to VDI [P5] (section Fa and section Ge) for details on the definition of the
Nusselt numbers for free and forced convection.
15-Nov-2013
2-77
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
u+
2
c = const
1
Similarly the path from the state behind the forward running wave and the calculated
state is along an - characteristic. The compatibility equation along an - characteristic is
2
c = const
1
The two equations are solved for the gas velocity and sound speed of the state behind the
forward running wave.
The pressure is calculated from the isentropic equation from the calculated state.
The state behind the backward running wave is calculated analogously with the role of and - characteristics exchanged.
2-78
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
Speed of sound
(m/s)
ageo
(m2/m3)
Ag
(m2)
cv
(J/kg/K)
cp,l,w
(J/kg/K)
dhyd
Hydraulic diameter
(m)
(-)
FR
(N)
FP
(-)
FB
(-)
Gr
(-)
(-)
(-)
LPipoe
Pipe length
(m)
MW
Molecular weight
(kg/kmol)
Nu
Nusselt Number
(-)
Nuforced
(-)
Nufree
(-)
pg
Static Pressure
(Pa)
Pr
Prandtl number
(-)
qw
(W)
Q oi
(W)
Reaction rate
(kmole/m3s)
(m)
Rel
(-)
Ret
(-)
Re
Reynolds number
(-)
Sh
Sherwood number
(-)
Time
(s)
Tamb
Ambient Temperature
(K)
Tg
Gas temperature
(K)
Trad
(K)
15-Nov-2013
2-79
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
Tw
Wall temperature
(K)
Tw,i
(K)
Tw,o
(K)
(m/s)
wj
(kg/kg)
(m)
(= A dx )
(m3)
Greek Letters
2-80
gw
(W/m2)
wa
(W/m2)
(m)
(-)
(-)
(-)
io
(-)
io
(-)
(-)
air
(W/m K)
eff
(W/m K)
(W/m K)
l,w
(W/m K)
(W/m2/K4)
(kg/m3)
l,w
(kg/m3)
Kinematic viscosity
(m2/s)
Stoichiometric coefficient
(-)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
+ div( U ) = 0
t
(2.5.1)
E
+ div( EU ) + div( pU ) = 0
t
(2.5.2)
Their integration over the volume and in the time will lead to the following discretized
forms:
15-Nov-2013
2-81
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
n +1 = n +
1 Nc
cU c t = 0
V c
(2.5.3)
Nc
Nc
(2.5.4)
where the subscript c indicates the connector and Nc is the total number of connectors
linked to the cell. The term Uc indicates the gas velocity at the connector, which is
oriented in a direction normal to the connector. The momentum equation is solved with
respect to the connector considering the balance between the pressure force and
momentum of the neighboring cells, namely left and right cells. The momentum balance is
written as follows:
U cn +1 =
where
) (
m cn + m cnU Rn m cnU Ln + p Ln p Rn Ac t
=0
Ac
L
(2.5.5)
m cn is the mass flux through the connector and t is the characteristic length
between the centroids of the two neighboring cells. Once the connector momentum has
been calculated the cell momentum is determined according to the net momentum flux
entering the cell:
Nc
n +1
(m U )CELL
= m cn +1U cn +1
(2.5.6)
c =1
2-82
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
excessive approximation [3D5]. This leads to the Euler formulation of the conservation
equations:
+ ( U ) = 0
t
( U )
+ ( U U ) = p
t
( E )
+ ( EU ) + ( pU ) = 0
t
(2.5.7)
This system of equations is then closed with the perfect gas equation of state. The 3Dcell
model is based on a quasi staggered grid approach, in which intensive properties such as
pressure, temperature, density, internal energy and other derived quantities are defined
over the cell element, while velocity and momentum are defined on the connectors [3D4].
The continuity and energy conservation equations are consequently solved with respect to
the cell element, taking into account the net flux of the conserved variables through the
connectors linked to the cell. Their integration in time over the cell volume will leads to
the following discretized forms:
N
n+1 = n +
( E )
n+1
1 c n n n
c U c Ac t
V c=1
N
(2.5.8)
1 c
= ( E ) + cnU cn Acn hcn t
V c=1
n
(2.5.9)
where the subscript c indicates the connector and Nc is the total number of connectors
attached to the cell. The term Uc indicates the gas velocity at the connector, which is
always oriented in a direction orthogonal to the connector face. According to the definition
of quasi staggered arrangement, to allow the construction of the connector momentum
equation, the velocity has been defined also in the centroid of the cell element. The cell
velocity is oriented in space and consequently has three components. As shown in Figure
2-30, when the solution of the connector momentum is addressed, the projection of the cell
velocities along the connector normal direction is considered. This operation reduces the
problem to a 1D case along the connector direction ( xn ). Hence the momentum equation
(Equation 2.5.7) can be rewritten as follows:
( UA)c U n2 A + pA
+
= 0.
t
xn
(2.5.10)
The momentum balance in the connector takes into account the momentum variation
along the characteristic direction and the resultant of the pressure forces acting on the left
and right side of the connector itself [3D2]. The discretized form of the momentum
equation will be as follows:
(2.5.11)
between the centroids of the two neighbouring cells and Un the projection of cell velocity
15-Nov-2013
2-83
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
along the connector normal direction. Once the connector momentum is calculated, the cell
momentum can be determined according to the net momentum flux entering the cell:
Nc
( UV )cell = ( UA)c Lc
(2.5.12)
c=1
When looping over the connectors linked to a specific cell, only a portion (left or right
according to the orientation of the port) of the momentum is accounted and the fraction of
this momentum is proportional to the characteristic distance Lc between the cell centre
and the connector. This allows the handling clusters of 3D cell elements in which the mesh
spacing is not uniform. Moreover, the summation involves vectorial quantities oriented
along the port directions, providing the cell momentum with a direction arbitrarily
oriented in the space.
LC,h = Lh + 0.8 d h
2-84
(2.5.13)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
This correction is necessary to take into account the inflow - outflow phenomena and the
fact that the flow field is extended outside the hole. The momentum equation (Equation
2.5.10) applied to the hole control volume becomes as follows:
t
Fh dt
LC,h
(2.5.14)
where cv, pcv, Ucv are respectively the density, the pressure and the normal velocity at the
control volume boundaries. In particular cv and pcv have been assumed equal to the same
quantities in the neighbouring cell, while the velocity Ucv has been interpolated between
the connector and cell centres as follows:
1
1
,
U cv,L =
LL
1
1
U cv,R =
LR
(2.5.15)
The term Fh in the momentum conservation equation (Equation 2.5.14) accounts for the
gas-wall friction and is determined as follows [3D5]:
Fh = ( UA)h |U h | f h
where the friction factor
2
dh
(2.5.16)
w
1
U 2
2
(2.5.17)
By knowing the mass flow for a single hole, the global mass flow through the connector is
then determined by multiplying the mass flow by the number of holes.
15-Nov-2013
2-85
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
2
1 w
p
p
p
m = d p0
l
1 p0 p0
R T0
p
R
t
0
0
pipe diameter
p0 ,T0
R,
w
t
2-86
(2.6.1)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
2
p p
m = p0
R T0
1 p0 p0
flow coefficient
15-Nov-2013
(2.7.1)
2-87
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
p0 ,T0
R,
If the actual pressure ratio is lower than the critical pressure ratio
pk 2 1
=
,
p0 + 1
pk
(2.7.2)
critical pressure
but supersonic flow is not feasible, the mass flow is dependent on the actual pressure ratio:
1
.
2 2 1
m = p0
R T0 + 1
+1
(2.7.3)
From the instantaneous mass flow rates at a system boundary, the orifice noise can be
determined.
By means of a Fourier analysis the amplitudes of the mass flow rates over frequency can be
obtained. They are considered sources of the noise generation and allow the instantaneous
sound pressure at a certain microphone position to be calculated using a directivity
function.
Ground reflections can also be considered by assuming an image source region [A6, A7, A8].
2.8. Restriction
2.8.1. Flow Restriction and Rotary Valve
The simulation of the flow through a flow restriction (and a rotary valve) is based on the
energy equation, the continuity equation, and the formulae for the isentropic change of
state:
m = Ageo po1
m
flow coefficient
Ageo
po1
To1
Ro
gas constant
Ro To1
(2.8.1)
The pressure function depends on the gas properties and on the pressure ratio:
2-88
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
+1
2
p2
p2 k
=
1 po1 po1
p2
(2.8.2)
Figure 2-34 shows the shape of the pressure function over pressure ratio.
pcrit 2 1
=
,
po1 + 1
(2.8.3)
the flow in the orifice reaches a Mach number of 1.0. The pressure function reaches its
maximum at the critical pressure ratio. The actual value of max is dependent on the
pressure ratio:
1
= max
2 1
,
=
+1
+ 1
(2.8.4)
The values of the pressure function shown in Figure 2-34 for pressure ratios less than
the critical pressure ratio are valid only for supersonic flow in the orifice. However, it
should be pointed out that supersonic flow can never be achieved just by lowering the
backpressure, but always requires a special shape of the pipe upstream of the orifice
(Laval-Nozzle).
15-Nov-2013
2-89
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
2.8.2. Throttle
The calculation of the flow through the throttle is very similar to the procedure discussed
in Section 2.8.1 for the flow restriction. For the throttle the flow coefficients in up- and
downstream directions are specified depending on the throttle angle, which is imposed by
the user. The flow coefficients are typically determined experimentally on a flow test
bench.
2-90
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
In this case BOOST is injecting over the whole engine cycle at a constant injection rate.
Formation of a fuel puddle at the wall and evaporation from it cannot be considered using
this method.
(b) Intermittent Injection
This option enables the user to model the injection event in a more detailed way.
(b1) Injection model
The injection process is described as a pulse with given start timing, pulse duration and/or
injection rate. Based on the specification of a reference cylinder the user specifies either
the start or the end of injection crank angle. Using this information BOOST calculates
the duration of the injection event (using the specified injector delivery rate),
the injected mass flow (using the specified injector delivery rate and the specified
duration).
The last option of course defines the injected mass flow directly; therefore the Mass Flow
Specification page is disabled.
(b2) Fuel puddle model
The evaporation characteristics of gasoline fuel are typically described by a distillation
curve as shown in Figure 2-35.
Figure 2-36: Distillation curves for different fuel types (Source: www.chevron.com)
Components with higher volatility evaporate at lower temperatures (approx. 50 degC),
components with lower volatility evaporate at higher temperatures (approx. 170 degC). In
F is split into Q
order to take this effect into account the actual amount of injected fuel m
different fuel-type packages where each package has different evaporation properties
depending on the userspecified distillation curve.
Q
m F = m q
(2.8.5)
q =1
15-Nov-2013
2-91
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
m F
m q
For each package q the actual mass in the fuel puddle is calculated from a simple balance
equation:
dmP ,q
dt
m P ,q
= (1 X ) m q m evap ,q C P mP ,q
(2.8.6)
CP
y q ,sat y q
MWq
m evap ,q = C evap k q AP g
1 y
q , sat
C evap
kq
AP
yq
y q ,sat
(2.8.7)
Shq =
k q d ref
Dq
(2.8.8)
with
2-92
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
d ref
Dq
Re
Sc
m a = A ( p1 p2 ) Fo c x d v
(2.8.9)
m
a
p1 , p2
static pressure
Fo
spring pre-load
c
x
d
v
spring stiffness
valve lift
damping constant
valve velocity
Equation2.8.9 describes the motion of a pressure actuated valve under consideration of its
inertia, the spring pre-load, the spring stiffness, and the viscous damping.
The flow coefficient of the check valve is determined as a function of valve lift and is then
used to calculate the mass flow rate as a function of upstream and downstream pressure.
15-Nov-2013
2-93
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
2.9. Junction
The BOOST program features three models for junctions. The constant pressure model
and the constant static pressure model can be used for all junctions. In the former case the
junction is treated like a plenum without any volume. As for a plenum, the flow
coefficients for flow into the junction and flow out of the junction must be defined for each
pipe attachment. From the gas conditions in the pipe, the static pressure and the
temperature at the center of each junction is calculated.
The constant static pressure model enforces the same static pressure in all pipe cross
sections attached to the junction. The flow coefficients are set to 1.
For three pipe junctions a more refined junction model is available. In this case the
BOOST code distinguishes between six possible flow patterns in the junction, as shown in
the following figure.
2-94
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
2.10. Charging
2.10.1. Turbine
For the simulation of a turbine, the performance characteristics along a line of constant
turbine speed or the complete turbine map for transient simulations are required.
The power provided by the turbine is determined by the turbine mass flow rate and the
enthalpy difference over the turbine.
PT = m T m (h3 h4 )
PT
m T
turbine power
h3
h4
15-Nov-2013
(2.10.1)
2-95
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
h3 h4 = s ,T
4
c p T3 1
p3
(2.10.2)
s,T
cp
mean specific heat at constant pressure between turbine inlet and outlet
T3
p 4 , p3
tot
m s ,T
The Simplified Model turbine is a pure power supplier for the mechanically connected
element while the Full model turbine is dynamically integrated in the mechanical network
and the current rotor speed is used for evaluation of the performance maps.
2.10.2. Compressor
The power consumption of the turbo compressor depends on the mass flow rates in the
compressor and the enthalpy difference over the compressor. The latter is influenced by
the pressure ratio, the inlet air temperature, and the isentropic efficiency of the
compressor.
Pc = m c (h2 h1 )
Pc
m c
h2
h1
h 2 h1 =
s ,c
p
2
c p T1
1
p 1
(2.10.3)
(2.10.4)
s,c
cp
mean value of the specific heat at constant pressure between compressor inlet
and outlet
T1
p2 , p1
The Simplified Model compressor is a pure power consumer for the mechanically
connected element while the Full model compressor is dynamically integrated in the
mechanical network and the current rotor speed is used for evaluation of the performance
maps.
2-96
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
2.10.3. Turbocharger
For steady state engine operation the performance of the turbocharger is determined by
the energy balance or the first law of thermodynamics. The mean power consumption of
the compressor must be equal to the mean power provided by the turbine:
Pc = PT
(2.10.5)
TC = m,TC s ,T s ,c
TC
(2.10.6)
Simplified Model:
For steady state engine performance a simplified turbocharger model may be used for the
simulation. Within this model the dynamics of the turbocharger (i.e. the variation of the
turbocharger speed) are not considered. Furthermore, the turbocharger efficiency is kept
constant during the engine cycle. As many test calculations have proven, this model
provides good accuracy for steady state engine calculations. It is very convenient to work
with this model, as only the mean values for the compressor efficiency, the turbine
efficiency, and the mechanical efficiency of the turbocharger must be specified. This
reduces the required input dramatically in comparison to the full turbocharger model
where entire compressor and turbine maps must be defined. Since turbine performance
maps cannot be provided by turbocharger manufacturers very often, this simplified
solution is usually the only alternative.
In BOOST, three calculation modes for the simplified model are available:
1. In the turbine layout calculation, the desired pressure ratio at the turbo compressor is
specified as input to the calculation. The program adjusts the flow resistance of the
turbine automatically, until the energy balance over the turbocharger is satisfied.
2. For the boost pressure calculation, the actual turbine size is specified in the input.
By solving the energy balance over the turbocharger, the actual boost pressure is
calculated.
3. For the waste gate calculation, both the turbine size as well as the desired pressure
ratio at the turbo compressor are specified in the input. The program bypasses a
certain percentage of the exhaust gases in order to achieve the energy balance over the
turbocharger. If the desired compressor pressure ratio cannot be achieved with the
specified turbine size, the program switches over to the boost pressure calculation
mode.
Full Model:
For unsteady engine operation the rotor dynamics of the turbocharger must be considered
because the wheel speed of the charger changes. From the balance of momentum at the
turbocharger wheel the change of wheel speed is obtained:
d TC
1 PT Pc
=
dt
I TC TC
15-Nov-2013
(2.10.7)
2-97
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
TC
I TC
The turbocharger full model requires the input of the compressor and turbine map.
The speed of the turbocharger wheel is calculated using Equation 2.10.7.
With the instantaneous wheel speed and the mass flow rate through the compressor, the
compressor's isentropic efficiency and the pressure ratio are interpolated from the
compressor map. The efficiency and the swallowing capacity of the turbine are
interpolated from the turbine map using the wheel speed and the pressure ratio across the
turbine. If a variable geometry turbine (VGT) is used, the vane position or some
equivalent information is also required.
In this case the turbine data is obtained from interpolation in the two maps valid for vane
positions nearest to the instantaneous one and from linear interpolation afterwards.
T2 = T1 1 +
s
2 1
p1
T2
T1
p2
p1
(2.10.8)
The power consumption of the mechanically driven compressor can be calculated from the
following formula:
1
1 p2
P = m c p T1
1
tot p1
2-98
(2.10.9)
P
m
cp
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
tot
m s
2.10.6. Catalyst
The gas dynamic behavior of a catalyst is modeled using the same model equations as given
for the pipe flow (see Section 2.4). The model additionally takes into account that a
honeycomb-type catalytic converter consists of a huge number of small and individual
channels. These small channels are the reason for very small Reynolds numbers and
therefore for a flow in the laminar regime. In this case the friction coefficient is evaluated
applying the Hagen-Poisseuille law, whereas in the turbulent region (if reached at all) a
turbulent friction coefficient used. The possibility of different channel shapes is taken into
account by Fanning friction factors that are applied in both, the laminar and turbulent
region.
In the BOOST cycle simulation the catalyst can be simulated with or without chemical
reactions:
For calculations using the General Species Transport option chemical reactions in
the catalyst can be activated and all reaction models can be used. The number and
the type of the chemical species must be in line with the requirements for the
specified reaction model. More detailed information about the reaction models and
the related input can be found in the BOOST Aftertreatment Manual.
For calculations using the Classic Species Transport option chemical reactions
cannot be activated. In this case the catalyst is purely considered as flow element.
15-Nov-2013
2-99
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
2.11. Engine
2.11.1. Engine Control Unit
In most modern engine concepts some functions of the engine are controlled by an
electronic engine management system. It is necessary to model such a control device
especially for the simulation of transients.
Usually engine control units are state machines. This means that the same input to the
unit produces different output depending on the state of the unit. The engine control
model in BOOST features three states:
Steady state
Engine acceleration
Engine deceleration
The transition from steady state to the state of engine acceleration is triggered if the
gradient of the load signal versus time exceeds a threshold specified by the user. The
transition to engine deceleration is triggered the same way when the negative gradient of
the load signal exceeds the user specified threshold.
Maps up to two dimensions are used to link the output (Actuators) of the control unit to
the input (Sensors). Figure 2-39 shows the principle of the calculation of an output value:
2-100
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
A baseline steady state value is taken from the baseline map. This value may be subjected
to corrections by adding values from correction maps or by multiplying it by factors from
correction maps. In the case of acceleration or deceleration, other corrections may be
applied to the steady state value. Then it is checked whether the output is within
predefined bounds which themselves may be defined as maps.
Either the load signal or a desired engine speed can be selected as the guiding input signal
of the control.
For the full range of input (Sensor-Channels) and output (Actuator-Channels) please refer
to the table in Chapter 6.2 of the BOOST Users Guide.
Toil
+ FMEPIP )
T =90C
oil
0.24
(2.11.1)
The last term takes the effect of a changing oil viscosity (as a function of oil temperature)
into account (Shayler et al. [F3]). The specific contributions are described in the following
sections.
15-Nov-2013
2-101
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
2.11.2.1.1. Crankshaft
The crankshaft mean effective pressure can be expressed as follows:
N Db3 Lb nb
Db
N 2 Db2 nb
FMEPCS = ccb
+
C
+
C
cs
td
2
2
nc
B S nc
B S nc
where:
B
S
Db
Lb
nb
nc
N
Ccb
Ccs
Ctd
Bore
Stroke
bearing diameter
bearing length
no. of bearings
no. of cylinders
Engine rotational Speed
Coefficient of the hydrodynamic losses in main bearings
Coefficient of friction losses in main bearing seals
Coefficient of friction losses due to viscous dissipation
(2.11.2)
[m]
[m]
[m]
[m]
[-]
[-]
[rpm]
[Pa/rpm m]
[Pa m2]
[Pa s2/m2 rpm]
N Db3 Lb nb
103 1
Vp
+
C
FMEPP = c pb
C
+
ps
pr
2
1 + N B 2
B S nc
P
(1.33 2.3810 2 VP )
Co i 0.088 rc + 0.182 rc
Pa
(2.11.3)
where:
Ccb
Cps
Cpr
Co
Vp
[Pa/rpm m]
[Pa s]
[Pa m2]
[Pa]
[m/s]
Nn
L1.5 N 0.5 nv
103 Lv nv
+ Cvm 1 +
B S nc
B S nc
(2.11.4)
103 nv
FMEPCF = Cvf 1 +
N S n c
(2.11.5)
2-102
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
N n
FMEPCF = Cvr v
S nc
(2.11.6)
where:
Cvb
Cvh
Cvm
Cvo
Lv
nv
Cvf
Cvr
[Pa m3/rpm]
[Pa m0.5/rpm0.5]
[Pa]
[Pa]
[m]
[-]
[Pa m]
[Pa m]
(2.11.7)
For the losses caused by the injector pump the following correlation by Bohac et al. [F1]is
used:
105 VD
FMEPIP =
0.0785 + 4.02x10 5 N + 1.06x108 N 2 + 4.64x108 IMEP + 2.17 x1010 N IMEP (2.11.8)
0.0025
2.11.2.2.1. Crankshaft
The FMEP in the crankshaft group is calculated using the following equation:
N 0.6 Db3 Lb nb
FMEPCS = ccb
2
S
n
B
c
ref
+ Ccs 2 Db
B Sn
(2.11.9)
where:
Ccb
Ccs
n
15-Nov-2013
[Pa/rpm m]
[Pa m2]
[-]
[Pa.s]
2-103
BOOST v2013.2
ref
Theory
[Pa.s]
N 0.6 Db3 Lb nb
V p0.5
V p0.5
2
C
C
FMEPP = c pb
+
+
pr
ps
B 2 S nc
B
B ref
(2.11.10)
where:
Cpb
Cps
Cpr
n
N 0.6 n
FMEPVT = cvb 2 b
B S nc ref
1.5 0.5
+ Cvs + Cvh Lv N nv
B 2 S n
c ref
5 + N S nc
10 nv
FMEPCF = Cvf 2 +
5 + N S nc
(2.11.12)
N nv
FMEPCF =
S nc
(2.11.13)
where:
Cvb
Cvh
Cvm
Cvs
Cvf
Cvr
n
2-104
= + N + N
ref
(2.11.14)
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
Engine
Mechanical Consumer
Vehicle
Turbocharger
Turbine
Turbo Compressor
PDC
Electrical Device
Basically there are two calculation types for the components possible:
The Engine and the Vehicle are always running in full model mode while the other
components can be specified according to the following compatibility matrix (e.g.: a Turbo
Compressor Full Model requires a Mechanical Connection Full Model to be linked to the
Engine):
15-Nov-2013
2-105
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
2-106
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
2.12. Acoustic
2.12.1. End Corrections
One-dimensional (1D) analytical models for the accurate acoustic performance prediction
of silencers and resonators require the introduction of acoustic length corrections in order
to account for the multidimensional effects at junctions.
The following is a summary of the end corrections applied at restrictions, open ends and
Helholtz resonators.
2.12.1.1. Restriction
e = 8 H ( )
r
3
H ( ) = 0.875(1 )(1.371 )
H ( ) = 1 1.238
0.5 1.0
0 < 0.5
(2.12.1)
Where,
15-Nov-2013
2-107
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
e
= 0.6
r
2.12.1.3. Helmholtz
e = 0.85r
Therefore the total end correction
(2.12.2)
e = 0.85.2r
(2.12.3)
2.12.2. Microphone
The values at an external microphone are based on the work of Blair and Coates [A6]. The
pressure amplitude is given by,
fd
sin
2 2 J1
2 2 4
f d u
a
( p )2 =
fd
2
16 R
sin
Source
@
System
Boundary
Intake or Exhaust Orifice diameter, d
External
Microphone
Distance, R
Angle,
2-108
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
Where,
Pressure amplitude and corresponds to the Acoustic > Microphone > Pressure
result. [Pa]
Intake or exhaust orifice diameter given by the pipe diameter at the system
boundary end [m]
frequency [Hz]
J1
Bessel function
( p rms )2 = 1
fd
sin
2 2 J1
2 2 4
f d u
a
( p rms )2 =
2
32 R
fd sin
SPL[dB ] = 10 log10
( p rms )2
4 x10 10
This corresponds to the Acoustic > Microphone > Linear > SoundPressure result. The
sound pressure level is also corrected according to the A-weighting scale in the result
Acoustic > Microphone > A-Weighted > SoundPressure.
15-Nov-2013
2-109
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
Ground effects are accounted for by assuming an image source to exist the same distance
below ground level as the actual source is above it, both sources being in the same vertical
plane. The mean square sound pressure due to the image source is given by:
fd
sin
2 2 J1
2 2 4
f d u
a
( p rms )2 image =
a
Source
@
System
Boundary
fd
sin
2 J1
fd sin
External
Microphone
Distance, R
Angle,
Image
2-110
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
15-Nov-2013
2-111
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
2.14. Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manual:
2-112
BDC
BMEP
BSFC
CRA
Crank angle
DPF
EVC
EVO
FIE
FMEP
IMEP
ISFC
IVC
IVO
PFP
PMEP
TDC
VGT
VNT
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
2.15. Literature
This section contains important information about the theoretical basis used for the
development of the code.
General Literature:
[G1]
Engine Terminology and Nomenclature General, NN, SAE - Standard J604, sl,
June 1995
3D Cell Elements:
[3D1]
[3D2]
Chapman, M., Novak, J. M. and Stein, R.A. Numerical Modeling of Inlet and
Exhaust Flows in Multi-Cylinder Internal Combustion Engines, ASME Winter
Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ, Nov. 1419, 1982
[3D3]
Fairbrother, R., Liu, S., Dolinar, A., Montenegro, G. and Onorati, A. Development
of a Generic 3D Cell for the Acoustic Modelling of Intake and Exhaust Systems,
ICSV16, Krakow, Poland, 2009
[3D4]
[3D5]
Acoustics:
[A6]
[A7]
[A8]
Cylinder:
[C1]
[C2]
[C3]
15-Nov-2013
2-113
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
[C4]
[C5]
Bozza, F., Fontana, G., Galloni E., and Torella, E. 3D-1D Analyses of the
Turbulent Flow Field, Burning Speed and Knock Occurrence in a Turbocharged SI
Engine, Detroit: SAE Technical Paper 2007-24-0029, 2007.
[C6]
Bozza F., Gimelli A., Senatore A. and Caraceni A., A Theoretical Comparison of
Various VVA Systems for Performance and Emission Improvements of SIEngines, SAE Paper 2001-01-0670, 2001.
[C7]
[C8]
Chmela, F. and Orthaber, G., Rate of Heat Release Prediction for Direct Injection
Diesel Engines Based on Purely Mixing Controlled Combustion, SAE Paper 1999
01 0186
[C9]
[C10]
[C11]
D'Errico, G., Ferrari, G., Onorat, A. and Cerri, T., Modeling the Pollutant
Emissions from a S.I. Engine, SAE Paper No. 2002-01-0006.
[C12]
[C13]
Gttgens, J., Mauss, F., Peters, N., Analytic Approximation of Burning Velocities
and Flame Thickness of Lean Hydrogen, Methane, Ethylene, Ethane, Acetylene
and Pro-pane Flames. 24th Symposium (International) on Combustion, The
Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, 1992
[C14]
[C15]
[C16]
Herweg R. and Maly R. R., A Fundamental Model for Flame Kernel Formation in
S.I. Engines, SAE Paper 922243, 1992.
[C17]
Hiroyasu, H., Kadota, T., Arai M., Development and Use of a Spray Combustion
Modeling to Predict Diesel Engine Efficiency and Pollutant Emissions, Part I:
Combustion Modeling, Bulletin of the JSME, Vol. 26, pp.569-575, 1983
2-114
Hires, S. D., Tabaczynski, R. J. and Novak, J. N., The Prediction of Ignition Delay
and Combustion Intervals for a Homogenous Charge Spark Ignition Engine, SAE
780232
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
[C20]
[C21]
Jung, D., Assanis, D.N., Multi-Zone DI Diesel Spray Combustion Model for Cycle
Simulation Studies of Engine Performance and Emissions, SAE 2001-0-1246, SAE
World Congress 2001, Detroit, USA.
[C22]
Kozarac, D., Mahalec, I., Sjeric M: Introducing Initial Conditions with Nonuniform Mixtures and Fuel Injection into the Multi Zone HCCI Simulation Model,
SAE Technical paper 2010-01-1083, 2010.
[C23]
[C24]
North G.L. and Santavicca D.A., The Fractal Nature of Premixed Turbulent
Flames, Comb. Science and Tech., Vol. 72, p.215-232, 1990.
[C25]
[C26]
Mller, U.C., Bollig M., Peters, N., Approximations for burning velocities and
Markstein numbers for lean hydrocarbon and methanol flames. Combustion and
Flame 108:349-356, 1997
[C27] Noske, G., Ein quasi-dimensionales Modell zur Beschreibung des ottomotorischen
Verbrennungsablaufes, Eggenstein, VDI, Fortschrittsberichte, Reihe 12, Nr 211
[C28]
Onorati A., Ferrari G., DErrico, G., 1D Unsteady Flows with Chemical Reactions
in the Exhaust Duct-System of S.I. Engines: Predictions and Experiments, SAE
Paper No. 2001-01-0939.
[C29]
[C30]
Poetsch, C., Ofner, H., Schutting, E., Assessment of a Multi Zone Combustion
Model for Analysis and Prediction of CI Engine Combustion and Emissions, SAE
2011-01-1439, SAE World Congress 2011, Detroit, USA.
[C31]
[C32]
[C33] Rhodes, D. B. and Keck, J. C., Laminar Burning Speed Measurements of IndolineAir-Dilunet Mixtures at High Pressures and Temperatures, SAE 850047
[C34]
15-Nov-2013
2-115
BOOST v2013.2
Theory
Schubert, C., Wimmer, A., Chmela, F., Advanced Heat Transfer Model for CI
Engines, SAE 2005-01-0695, 2005 SAE World Congress, Detroit, USA.
[C36]
Schubiger R.A., Boulouchos K., Eberle M.K, Rubildung und Oxidation bei der
dieselmotorischen Verbrennung, MTZ 5/2002, 342-353, 2002.
[C37]
[C38]
Varde, K.S., Popa, D.M., Varde, L.K., Spray Angle and Atomization in Diesel
Sprays. SAE 841055, 1984 SAE World Congress, Detroit, USA
[C41]
[C42]
Wimmer, A., Pivec, R., Sams, Th., Heat Transfer to the Combustion Chamber and
Port Walls of IC Engines Measurement and Prediction, SAE 2000-01-0568, 2000
SAE World Congress, Detroit, USA
[C43]
[C44]
Wolfer, H., "Der Zndverzug im Dieselmotor. VDI Forschungsheft Nr. 392, 1938
[C45] Woschni, G., A Universally Applicable Equation for the Instantaneous Heat
Transfer Coefficient in Internal Combustion Engines, SAE 6700931
[C46] Woschni, G., Einflu von Ruablagerungen auf den Wrmebergang zwischen
Arbeitsgas und Wand im Dieselmotor, in proceedings to Der Arbeitsproze des
Verbrennungsmotors, Graz 1991
[C47] Woschni, G. and Anisits, F., Eine Methode zur Vorausberechnung der nderung
des Brennverlaufs mittelschnellaufender Dieselmotoren bei genderten
Betriebsbedingungen, MTZ 34, 1973
[C48]
Friction:
2-116
[F1]
Bohac, S. V., Baker, D. M. and Assanis, D. N. A global model for steady state and
transient S. I. Engine Heat transfer studies, International Congress & Exposition
Detroit, Michigan Feb 26-29, 1996, SAE 960073
[F2]
15-Nov-2013
Theory
BOOST v2013.2
[F3]
[F4]
Pipe Flow:
[P1]
[P2]
[P3]
Lienhard John H. IV and Lienhard John H. V "A Heat Transfer Text Book,
Phlogiston Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 3rd edition, 2003
[P4]
[P5]
[P6]
[P7]
15-Nov-2013
2-117