Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kinnos
By Rabbi Joshua Flug
Introduction:
The purpose of this packet is to provide some additional insights into the Kinnos. In
compiling this packet, I attempted to find sources that are not readily available.
While, I was able to find some additional sources, Rabbi Soloveitchik's shiurim on
the Kinnos are the most comprehensive work on the Kinnos and are summarized in
The Lord is Righteous in All His Ways, edited by R. Jacob J. Schacter. The comments
below are a combination of some of the other sources and a summary of R.
Soloveitchik's comments.
Please note that some of our chaveirim wrote additional comments on the Kinnos
for "Tisha B'Av To-Go 5769."
2) The Kinnah starts with the word "Shavas." R. Soloveitchik explained that this
word was specifically chosen because it connotes suddenness. The verse
states "U'vayom HaShevi'I Shavas," connoting that G-d stopped work at the
exact moment that Shabbos began. Despite all of the warnings that the Beis
HaMikdash would be destroyed, the churban took the Jewish people by
surprise. Furthermore, up until the churban the Beis HaMikdash was in all its
glory and it quickly deteriorated to nothing. [See The Lord is Righteous pp.
160-161 and Harerei Kedem Vol. II page 306.]
R. Soloveitchik adds that this is why the kinnah mentions the marriage of Har
Sinai (Chittun Chukei Chorev). Ma'amad Har Sinai was like a marriage
between G-d and the Jewish people. A marriage involves a legally binding
contract that includes the responsibility of the husband redeeming his wife
from captivity. [Harerei Kedem page 307. The marriage theme is developed
in The Lord is Righteous pages 191-198.]
2) Not all Amoraim and Rishonim subscribe to the distinction between b'ris avos
and zechus avos. [See Shabbos 55a, Rashi and Tosafos.] As such, one can
alternatively explain the kinnah based on an insight of R. Eliyahu Dessler,
Michtav Me'Eliyahu Vol. I pages 8-19. R. Dessler discusses the meaning of
zechus avos. Can it really be true that the because of the acts of our
forefathers, we should be given preferential treatment? He explains the
concept of zechus avos based on the comments of R. Chaim Volozhiner,
Ruach Chaim 5:3, that the purpose of the nisyonos of the Avos was to ingrain
these character traits in future generations. The reason why people who are
not that committed to Judaism have been able to be moser nefesh for the
Torah is that they inherited these qualities from the avos. R. Dessler
suggests that this is the meaning of zechus avos. When a judge is
sentencing an individual, he will factor in the person's surroundings and his
potential to repent. Because the Jewish people are ingrained with the
character traits of the avos, it is a zechus that G-d will take into consideration
when judging the Jewish people. R. Dessler notes that even an individual who
does not display any of these character traits still has a minimal zechus in
that he will still pass on those traits to the next generation.
As such, one can explain that the kinnah recalls the nisyonos of the avos
(Asher Beirarta Livechunehca) and asks why G-d did not factor in all of the
character traits that were ingrained in the Jewish people throughout the
generations. The kinnah then recounts all of the "investments" that G-d
made based on the potential of the Jewish people to employ these ingrained
character traits and questions why G-d did not let these investments come to
fruition.
The Meforshim on the Midrash quote a tradition from the Ba'alei HaTosafos
that Yoshiahu's mistake was not a halachic mistake. He was correct in that
one should not follow the tradition from Yeshayahu if it contradicts the Torah.
His mistake was that he should have realized that if Yirmiyahu was still giving
prophecies regarding the destruction of the Jewish people, there must be
hidden transgressions happening under his rule. His failure to properly
assess the spiritual status of the Jewish people led to his downfall.
R. Ya'akov Kuli, Yalkut Me'Am Lo'ez, Eichah writes that there was a double
punishment of innocent women eating their innocent children in response to
the double atrocity of(1) a murder in the Mikdash, the place of mishpat, (2)of
a kohen prophet, who represents spiritual perfection.
2) R. Yechezkel Sarna, Daliyos Yechezkel, Vol. III (page 269) asks: Why is this a
kinnah and not a tochachah? Shouldn't we criticize these women for being so
cruel to their children? He answers that one must conclude that when a
mother acts in such a manner to her child, it must be as a result of
punishment rather than cruelty. These mothers were forced to do things that
completely contradicted their natural behavior. It was a punishment shelo
b'derech hateva. This punishment can only be as a result of a transgression
that transcended nature, which was the murder of Zechariah in the Mikdash.
2) R. Soloveitchik notes that the recitation of Arzei HaLevanon differs from the
recitation of Eleh Ezkerah on Yom Kippur. The recitation on Yom Kippur, is
written in the tone of selichos and its purpose is to provide atonement. Just
as a korban can bring atonement, the death of the righteous can also bring
atonement, especially when they are killed on Kiddush HaShem. On Tisha
B'Av, we recite a Kinnah for the loss of these great scholars. The destruction
of the Second Temple not only brought about death and destruction to the
Jewish people. It also brought about destruction of Torah scholarship.
As with the kinnah regarding the asarah harugei malchus, this kinnah
highlights the tragedy of human life as well as the destruction of Torah
scholarship. [See The Lord is Righteous pages 257-264, for R. Soloveitchik's
perspective of the impact that the crusades had on Torah scholarship.]
3) R. Soloveitchik notes that the contrast between the exodus from Egypt and
the exodus from Yerushalayim serves to intensify the grief. [The Lord is
Righteous pages 187-191]
2) R. Hillel wrote a letter about the event and claims with certainty that the
burning of the Talmud was a direct result of the burning of Rambam's works.
The letter can be found in Chemda Genuzah (pages 18a-21a).
3) R. Soloveitchik notes that one must appreciate the fact that this event took
place before the invention of the printing press. There were manuscripts of
commentaries that were lost forever and there was great fear that this could
mean the end of Torah Sheba'al peh. [See The Lord is Righteous pages 287-
288.]
Kinnah #45- אלי ציון ועריה
1) There is a tradition from R. Chaim Soloveitchik that "b'neh beischa k'vatchila"
in the Musaf of Shalosh Regalim is sung to the tune of Eli Tziion [Nefesh
HaRav page 197. It should be noted that there are two tunes that are
currently sung for Eli Tzion. One of the tunes is the exact tune sung for "bneh
beischa." However, the more popular tune for Eli Tzion is slightly modified.
There is a forum discussion about this issue for those interested.] In many
congregations, the tune for Eli Tzion is also sung for Lecha Dodi on Shabbos
Chazon. R. Soloveitchik explains that Eli Tzion is the last kinnah and the
focus is on the fact that when it comes to aveilus yeshana, there is no closure
until the Beis HaMikdash is rebuilt. We must always mourn the destruction of
the Mikdash. This is why we sing this tune when we mention the fact that we
long for rebuilding the Mikdash, even on Shabbos and Yom Tov. [See Nefesh
HaRav and The Lord is Righteous pages 313-315.]