Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S0308-8146(15)00410-0
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.047
FOCH 17294
To appear in:
Food Chemistry
Received Date:
Revised Date:
Accepted Date:
5 December 2014
11 March 2015
14 March 2015
Please cite this article as: Mkadmini hammi, K., Jdey, A., Abdelly, C., Majdoub, H., Ksouri, R., Optimization of
ultrasound-assisted extraction of antioxidant compounds from Tunisian Zizyphus lotus fruits using response surface
methodology, Food Chemistry (2015), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.047
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
4
5
10
11
12
13
14
Laboratoire des Interfaces et des Matriaux Avancs (LIMA), Facult des Sciences de
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Abstract
30
The optimization of antioxidant extraction conditions from a ripe edible fruits of Zizyphus
31
lotus (L.) with an ultrasound-assisted system was achieved by response surface methodology.
32
The central composite rotatable design was employed for optimization of extraction
33
parameters in terms of total phenolic content and antioxidant activities using 2,2-diphenyl-1-
34
35
operating conditions for extraction were as follows: ethanol concentration, 50%; extraction
36
time, 25 min; extraction temperature, 63C and ratio of solvent to solid, 67 mL/g. Under these
37
conditions, the obtained extract exhibited a high content of phenolic compounds (40.782 mg
38
gallic acid equivalents/g dry matter) with significant antioxidant properties (the total
39
antioxidant activity was 75.981 mg gallic acid equivalents /g dry matter and the 2,2-diphenyl-
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
3
56
1. Introduction
57
The genus Zizyphus belonging to the family Rhamnaceae is widespread in tropical and sub-
58
tropical regions: Asia, Africa, North America, South America, Oceania and Europe with the
59
center of diversity in Asia (Richardson et al., 2004). There are 135-170 species of Zizyphus
60
(Maraghni et al., 2010). Only Z. spina-christi (L.) Willd, Z. vulgaris Lam. and Z. lotus (L.)
61
Lam are found in Tunisia. Recently, several pharmacological researches (Borgi & Chouchane,
62
2009; Borgi et al., 2007) have been reported on the various species of Zizyphus (Rhamnaceae)
63
particularly Zizyphus lotus which is commonly known as sedra and the edible fruit called
64
nbeg. In Tunisia, this species grows under a variety of environmental conditions. So, it is
65
localized in different regions mainly in arid zone such as Tozeur. Zizyphus lotus is dormant
66
from October through March and mature plant flowers in May and June and produces fruits in
67
August (Maraghni et al., 2010). This plant is used in folklore medicine for the treatment of
68
various diseases such as diabetes, bronchitis, diarrhea and abscess (Le-Floch, 1983).
69
Previous studies have been reported on Zizyphus lotus from the locality of Cherahil (Monastir,
70
Tunisia). So, anti-spasmodic activities of leaves and root barks of this plant were
71
demonstrated in rodents (Borgi & Chouchane, 2009). Besides, Borgi et al. (2007)
72
demonstrated that root barks of Z. lotus, showed a significant and dose-dependent anti-
73
inflammatory and analgesic activity in carrageenan-induced paw oedema in rats. In the same
74
paper, it was mentioned that the presence of flavonoids in the Zizyphus lotus extracts was
75
responsible for these beneficial effects. Also, chemical analysis of these species has led to the
76
isolation of four dammarane type saponins from root bark of Z. lotus collected in March 1994
77
at the locality of Cherahil (Renault et al., 1997). Fruit of Zizyphus lotus of North Africa is
78
delicious and consumed directly due to its high nutritional value. In fact, Abdeddaim et al.
79
(2014) demonstrated that this organ was rich in minerals (calcium, magnesium, sodium,
80
potassium and phosphorus), carbohydrates, fatty acids and proteins that are essential for some
81
physicochemical processes necessary for a good health. Besides, Benammar et al. (2010)
82
showed that the fruit pulp of this plant contained a higher vitamin A and C compared to the
83
other parts. These vitamins are responsible for human cell T-prolifiration. In the same paper,
84
it was revealed that the fruit pulp was the richest source of linoleic acid (18:2n6), a precursor
85
of n6 fatty acids. In addition, it was mentioned that the fruit pulp exhibited a higher
86
antioxidant capacity than other parts of Z. lotus. Moreover, Alhakmani et al. (2014)
87
demonstrated that fruits of Zizyphus spina-christi are rich in phenolic compounds responsible
4
88
for the antioxidant activity. Also, it was mentioned that this organ could be used as a natural
89
source of antioxidants to prevent the progression of some diseases. In this context, secondary
90
metabolites like flavonoids, phenolic acids, saponins and alkaloids are a specific antioxidants
91
compounds that protect plant, animals, food and human from oxidative stress which is a result
92
of the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), including superoxide anion radical,
93
hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical as well as reactive nitrogen species (RNS) which can
94
cause inflammation and contribute to tissue damage (Mothana, 2011). Besides, in food
95
products, free radicals react with lipids and cause lipid peroxidation which affects the quality
96
of product (taste, color and flavor) (Biglari et al., 2008). In humans, oxidative stress causes
97
98
99
Lacopini et al. (2008), antioxidants, such as phenolic acids and flavonoids, have a great
100
capacity for scavenging free radicals like peroxide, hydroperoxide of lipid hydroxyl, and thus
101
inhibit the oxidative mechanisms that lead to cardiovascular diseases and cancer. Besides, it is
102
well known that flavonoids and phenolic acids could preserve the quality of food products
103
from chemical oxidation due to exposure to air (oxygen) or to the effects of light
104
105
In most food industries, synthetic antioxidants for example, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA),
106
butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), tertiary butyl. hydroquinone (TBHQ) and propyl gallate
107
(PG) are used in order to prevent the rancidity of processed food. Because of their potential
108
carcinogenicity and other dangerous effects, they have been replaced by natural antioxidants
109
110
The present study investigates the antioxidant effect of the ethanolic extract of the edible fruit
111
112
Various novel extraction techniques have been developed for the extraction of antioxidant
113
114
115
116
effective at extracting secondary metabolites due to the acoustic cavitation effect produced in
117
the solvent by the passage of ultrasonic waves which can lead to the destruction of cells and
118
enhance the contact surface area between solid and liquid phases. These effects permit better
119
penetration of the solvent into the sample increasing the extraction yield of secondary
120
121
122
composition, extraction temperature, extraction time, and solvent to solid ratio (Cacace &
123
Mazza, 2002). Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a useful tool for optimizing the
124
125
empirical models that describes the effect of independent variables and their interactions on
126
127
128
concentration, ratio of liquid to dry matter through the ultrasound bath equipment to
129
determine the best extraction conditions of antioxidants from Z. lotus fruits using RSM and
130
131
132
133
Zizyphus lotus (L.) fruits were collected from Tozeur, South of Tunisia, in August 2013. In
134
order to minimize the degradation of phenolic compounds, fruits were dried in lyophilizer and
135
136
137
Gallic acid was purchased from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). Sulfuric acid, ammonium
138
molybdate and ethanol (HPLC grade) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
139
140
sodium carbonate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Brazil). Ultrapure water was obtained
141
142
143
144
Extractions were carried out in an ultrasonic bath (Sonorex Digital 10 P, Bandelin) at 35 KHz.
145
Samples (2g) were powdered and placed into Erlenmeyer flasks (250 mL). Samples were
146
147
different extraction time (from 5 to 45 min), in different ratios of aqueous ethanol to raw
148
149
temperature to 65C. In this study, ethanol was selected as extraction solvent due to its low
150
toxicity. The mixtures were centrifuged at 2000 x g for 20 min at 4C and the supernatants
151
152
153
154
The total antioxidant activity (TAA) of the extract was evaluated by the phosphomolybdenum
155
method according to the procedure described previously (Prieto et al., 1999). The assay is
156
based on the reduction of Mo (VI)Mo (V) by the extract and subsequent formation of a green
157
phosphate/Mo (V) complex at acidic pH. A 0.2 mL extract was combined with 2 mL of
158
159
molybdate).
160
The tubes containing the reaction solution were incubated at 95C for 90 min. Then the
161
absorbance of the solution was measured using a UVvis spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer
162
163
was expressed as milligram gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per gram of dry weight material
164
165
166
167
using a method described elsewhere (Hanato et al., 1988); 1mL of extract with different
168
concentrations were mixed with 250 L of freshly prepared DPPH solution (0.2 mM in
169
methanol). The mixtures were shaken vigorously and stand for 30 min at room temperature in
170
the dark and then the absorbance values were measured at 517 nm against the blank reagent.
171
The radical scavenging activity (percent inhibition) was expressed as percentage of DPPH
172
173
sample
Percent Inhibition (%) = 1
100
A
control
(1)
174
where Acontrol is the absorbance of the control (DPPH solution with no sample), and Asample is
175
the absorbance of the samples (DPPH solution with sample). All tests were run in triplicate
176
and the average value was calculated. Antiradical DPPH bleaching activity is expressed as
177
IC50 in (mg/mL) which denoted the concentration of sample required to scavenge 50% of
178
DPPH free radicals. The lower value of IC5O corresponded to the highest antiradical activity.
179
180
181
Total phenolic content (TPC) of different extracts were determined using FolinCiocalteu
182
reagent slightly modified by Dewanto et al. (2002) using gallic acid as a standard. Briefly,
183
125 L of each suitable diluted extract was added to 500 l of distilled water and 125 l of
184
the FolinCiocalteu reagent. The mixture was shaken and allowed to stand for 6 min, before
185
addition of 1250 l of Na2CO3 (70 g. L-1). The solution was then adjusted with distilled water
186
187
188
189
curve was performed with gallic acid (concentrations ranging from 50 to 200 g/mL) and
190
total phenolic content was expressed as milligram of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per gram
191
of dry weight material (mg GAE/g Z.lotus). Measurements were performed in triplicate.
192
193
194
195
Responses surface methodology (RSM) was employed to determine the optimum levels of the
196
extraction time (min) (X1), the ethanol concentration (v/v, %) (X2), the extraction temperature
197
(C) (X3) and the solvent to solid ratio (mL/g) (X4) related to three responses yields of total
198
antioxidant activity (YTAA) , DPPH free radical scavenging activity (YIC50) and total phenolic
199
content (YTPC). The operating conditions were given in Table 1. We evaluated the effects of
200
extraction time that varied from 5 to 45 min, ethanol concentration was ranged from 0 to
201
100%, the range of temperature extraction was selected from ambient temperature to 65C
202
avoiding the boiling temperature of ethanol at 78C and the ratio of solvent to solid was
203
evaluated from 10 to 70 mL/g. All these conditions were selected based on preliminary
204
experimental results.
205
The variation of total antioxidant activity (YTAA) , DPPH free radical scavenging activity
206
(YIC50) and total phenolic content (YTPC) versus the four retained variables X1, X2, X3, and X4,
207
were studied using a polynomial second degree model given by the following equation:
208
4
4
4
Y = + X + X 2 + X X (2)
k
0
i i
ii i
ij i j
i =1
i =1
i j =1
209
Where Yk represents the measured response variables, 0 is a constant, i, ii and ij are the
210
linear, quadratic and interactive coefficients of the model, respectively. Xi and Xj are the
211
212
213
corresponding to a complete factorial design 24, eight experiments as star points (2) and
214
five in the middle factors fields. Statistical analysis was performed using the software
215
STATISTICA (version 7.0) for the experimental design and regression analysis of the
216
experimental data. Students t-test permitted the checking of the statistical significance of the
217
regression coefficient and Fishers F-test determined the second-order model equation at a
218
probability (p) of 0.001, 0.01 or 0.05. Model adequacy was evaluated using the lack of fit, the
219
coefficient of determination (R2) and the F-test value obtained from the analysis of variance
220
(ANOVA). Regression analysis and three and two dimensional response surface plots were
221
plotted to determine optimum conditions for total antioxidant capacity (YTAA) , DPPH free
222
223
The test of statistical significance was based on the total error criteria with a confidence level
224
of 95.0%
225
226
227
228
Total antioxidant activity (YTAA) , DPPH scavenging activity (YIC50) and total phenolic
229
content (YTPC) in Zizyphus lotus (L.) extracts obtained from 29 experiments were listed in
230
Table 1. The data obtained from the central composite design (24) were fitted to second order
231
polynomial equations. The significance of the coefficients of the models was determined by
232
233
corresponding P values which are inferior to 0.05, indicating the considerable effect of these
234
coefficients on respective response variables. In fact, the results showed that for three
235
responses, extraction time and ethanol concentration have a significant quadratic effects
236
(p<0.05) (negative effect on TAA and TPC and positive effect on DPPH scavenging ability).
237
All the linear coefficients were significant (p<0.05) on DPPH scavenging ability and TPC
9
238
239
response.
240
For three responses, a considerable interaction effect was established between variables as
241
242
concentration and extraction temperature - ratio of solvent to dry matter. Only for the
243
response of DPPH scavenging activity, the interaction between extraction time and extraction
244
temperature had a significant effect. Also, interaction between ethanol concentration and
245
246
The validity of models are confirmed using lack of fit testing as summarized in Table 3;
247
ANOVA for the lack of fit test for three responses were insignificant (p>0.05) indicating that
248
249
determination (R2) of 0.8255, 0.8466 and 0.8303 were obtained for the response of total
250
antioxidant activity, DPPH scavenging ability and total phenolic content, respectively and
251
revealed that there are a good correlations between responses and independent variables.
252
253
254
Taking into account only the significant factors (Table 2), the obtained model that shows the
255
relationship between the TAA and the extraction parameters with a satisfactory correlation
256
257
258
+ 7.52313X
- 3.91092X 12 - 4.53330 X 22
(3)
259
260
The statistical significance of regression equation was checked by Fishers F-test. As shown
261
in Table 3, the F Value of regression coefficients is superior to the tabulated value (Fregression =
262
9.99052 > Ftabulated(9,19,0.05) = 2.42) and the P Value was smaller than 0.0001 which indicated
263
that the variables of the model have a significant effect on the total antioxidant activity
264
response at 95% confidence level. Also, the ratio of the mean square of lack-of-fit and pure
265
266
means that the lack of fit statistic was not significant (p > 0.05) hence the model is valid.
267
Two and three dimensional response surfaces were plotted for the results of total antioxidant
268
activity in Zizyphus lotus (L.) extracts as presented in Fig.1 which shows the interaction
269
10
270
According to Fig.1.A, the increase of both ethanol concentration and extraction time increases
271
the response of TAA (extraction temperature and ratio of liquid to solid were fixed at the
272
center). Fig.1.B demonstrated that the TAA increased significantly and can surpass the value
273
of 50 with the increase of both temperature and ethanol concentration at a fixed extraction
274
time and ratio (liquid to dry matter) of 25 min and 40 mL/g, respectively. Fig1.C showed that
275
the TAA increased considerably with the increase of ratio and the decrease of ethanol
276
277
It could be seen from Fig.1.D that there is an area in which the value of TAA can be superior
278
than 80 at a high ratio and extraction temperature when ethanol concentration and extraction
279
280
281
282
283
284
(R2=0.8466). Equation (4) shows the mathematical model that describes the relationship
285
between the significant independent variables and response of DPPH scavenging activity.
286
287
(4)
288
289
According to Fishers F-test, the F value of regression coefficients is superior to the tabulated
290
value (F
291
smaller than 0.0001. This indicated that the independent variables listed in Table 2 have a
292
significant effect on the response of DPPH scavenging ability. Also, the ratio of the mean
293
294
295
fit indicated that this one was insignificant and the model is valid.
296
Fig.2 presents the two and three dimensional responses surface of all significant interaction
297
298
The effect of ethanol concentration, extraction time and their mutual interaction on the DPPH
299
300
increase in the antiradicalair activity was observed with the increase in extraction time until
301
35 min, and then a decrease in this activity was observed with the increase of extraction time.
regeression
= 9.93938 > Ftabulated(10, 18, 0.05) = 2.41) and the P value corresponding was
lack
of-
11
302
However, in Fig.2.B similar linear increase in the DPPH scavenging capacity was observed
303
with the increase in extraction temperature and extraction time at a fixed ratio and ethanol
304
concentration. The effect of ratio and ethanol concentration shown in Fig.2.C demonstrated
305
that the inhibition concentration at 50% (IC50) could be inferior to the value of 0.4 at a high
306
307
As can be seen in Fig.2.D, a good inhibition of DPPH free radical was observed with an
308
309
310
311
The mathematical model correlating the content of total polyphenols (TPC) in term of
312
313
314
TPC
(5)
315
316
As given in Table 3, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of total phenolic content pointed out a
317
318
observed that the F-value model is superior to the tabulated one (Fregression=8.07704 >
319
Ftabulated(10,18,0.05) = 2.41). This result indicates that the model have a significant effect on the
320
321
The lack of fit test determines the adequacy of selected model describing the effect of
322
extraction parameters on TPC response. In fact, results showed that the ratio of the mean
323
square of lack-of-fit and pure error is inferior to the tabulated value (Flack
324
=4.64275<Ftabulated
325
326
As clearly shown from Fig.3.A, at 50% of ethanol concentration, the extraction of TPC
327
increased with extraction time until 41min, while. Above this extraction time (> 41min), the
328
329
330
concentration enhanced significantly the TPC extraction when the extraction time and the
331
ratio (liquid to dry matter) were fixed at 25 min and 40 mL/g, respectively.
(14,4,0.05)
-of- fit
= 5.88), which means that the lack of fit statistic was not
12
332
The effect of ratio (liquid to dry matter) and ethanol concentration shown in Fig.3.C
333
demonstrated that the TPC value could be superior to 30 mg GAE/g dry matter for a high ratio
334
(liquid to dry matter) and a low level of ethanol concentration variable when the extraction
335
temperature and the extraction time were fixed at 45C and 25 min, respectively.
336
As it can be seen from Fig.3.D, total phenolic content increase dramatically and could reach
337
more than 40 mg GAE/g dry matter with the increase of both ratio (liquid to dry matter) and
338
339
340
341
The objective of this procedure is to determine the levels of experimental factors which would
342
allow obtaining an extract with a high antioxidant activity. Response surface methodology
343
was a good tool for optimization. In fact, a compromise was found in choosing the optimal
344
area according to the following criteria: IC50 < 0.4 mg/mL and TAA > 70 mg (GAE)/g dry
345
matter and TPC > 40 mg (GAE)/g dry matter. These criteria are satisfied if one can explore
346
the results of Fig.1.D of total antioxidant activity, Fig.2.D of IC50 and Fig.3.D of TPC. For the
347
three responses, respectively, the optimum point was marked in the area which corresponds to
348
the following conditions: ethanol concentration, 50%; extraction time, 25 min; extraction
349
temperature, 63C; and ratio of liquid to dry matter, 67 (mL/g). Under these optimal
350
conditions of extraction, the experimental values of total antioxidant activity, DPPH free
351
radical scavenging activity (IC50) and total phenolic content were, 0.2895 mg/mL, 75.9815
352
mg (GAE)/g dry matter and 40.782 mg (GAE)/g dry matter, respectively. Compared with
353
Zizyphus lotus from other region of Tunisia and other countries, the DPPH scavenging ability
354
of southern Tunisian Z.lotus fruits (IC50=0.289 mg/mL) evaluated in this study was similar to
355
356
mg/mL) (Ghazghazi et al.,2014). Also, our results were approximately 1.65 times higher than
357
those obtained in Moroccan Zizyphus lotus fruits (IC50= 477.6 47.6 g/mL) using 70%
358
359
compounds in this specie was 1200 g p-Coumaric acid equivalents per gram of dry matter.
360
Furthermore, previous studies have been reported on other species of Zizyphus. In fact, Okala
361
et al. (2014) investigated the antioxidant properties of Zizyphus mauritiana fruits from Nigeria
362
and reported that the IC50 value of DPPH was found to be 338.45g/mL, which was
363
approximately 1.17 times lower than the value obtained in the present work. Concerning the
13
364
measurement of total phenolic contents, the value was about 4.02353.6 mg gallic acid
365
equivalents/g dry matter. This result was lower than the one reported for southern Tunisian
366
Z.lotus fruits. In fact, these variability of antioxidant activities and total phenolic contents
367
values of Zizyphus genus could be explained by various factors such as, the geographical
368
provenance, the type of species and the nature of solvent extraction as demonstrated by
369
370
In comparison with other exotic fruits, antioxidant compound content in southern Tunisian
371
Z.lotus fruits were higher than Mangosteen (TPC= 54 7 mg/100g fresh fruit,
372
IC50=11.5 3.6 mg/mL), and Dragon fruit (TPC= 21 6 mg/100g fresh fruit, IC50=27.5 3.9
373
374
375
4. Conclusion
376
In this work, response surface methodology (RSM) employing central composite rotatable
377
design (CCDR) was successfully used to determine the optimal conditions for the extraction
378
of antioxidant compounds from Zizyphus lotus (L.) fruits under ultrasonication. In this
379
context, the same statistical methodology was successfully used by Zhao et al. (2014) to
380
381
brevicornum. In fact, only three extraction variables were optimized including ethanol
382
concentration, extraction time and ratio of aqueous ethanol to raw material for the
383
achievement of high extraction yield of the phenolic compounds with high antioxidant
384
activity. The selected range of each independent variables and obtained results of optimum
385
386
The experimental results adequately fitted with second-order polynomial models and showed
387
significant linear, quadratic and interaction effects of the independent variables. The
388
regression coefficients (R2) of 0.8255, 0.8466 and 0.8303 were obtained for the response of
389
total antioxidant activity, DPPH scavenging ability and total phenolic content, respectively.
390
These values revealed good correlations between responses and independent variables. The
391
same optimal conditions could be used to get an extract from Zizyphus lotus (L.) fruits with a
392
high phenolic content, a high total antioxidant activity and a lower IC50 of scavenging activity
393
on DPPH free radical. In fact, a compromise between these three responses (YIC50, YTAA and
394
YTPC), according to the response surface analysis was determined. The optimum operating
395
conditions for extraction were as follows: ethanol concentration, 50%; extraction time, 25
14
396
min; extraction temperature, 63C and solvent to solid ratio, 67 mL/g. Under these conditions,
397
the obtained extract exhibited a high content of phenolic compounds (40.782 mg gallic acid
398
equivalents/g dry matter) with significant antioxidant properties (the total antioxidant activity
399
was 75.981 mg gallic acid equivalents /g dry matter and the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
400
401
responses exhibited that experimental values are in agreement with the predicted ones (TPC
402
of 42.081 mg (GAE)/g dry matter, TAA of 77.134 mg (GAE)/g dry matter and IC50 value of
403
0.311 mg/mL). The results also showed that Zizyphus lotus (L.) fruits present potential
404
antioxidant activities that make it beneficial for human health by preventing or reducing
405
oxidative damage.
406
407
Acknowledgements
408
This work was supported by a grant from Ministry of Higher Scientific Research and
409
Information and Communication Technologies of Tunisia. The authors would like to thank
410
the technical team of the National Research Centre of Materials Sciences in Borj Cedria
411
Technological Park.
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
15
422
References
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
Abdeddaim, M., Lombarkia, O., Bacha, A., Fahloul, D., Abdeddaim, D., Farhat, R., Saadoudi,
M., Noui, Y., & Lekbir, A. (2014). Biochemical characterization and nutritional properties of
Zizyphus lotus L. fruits in Aures region, Northeastern of Algeria. Annals. Food Science and
Technology, 15, 75.
Alhakmani, F., Khan, S. A., & Ahmad, A. (2014). Determination of total phenol, in-vitro
antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of seeds and fruits of Zizyphus spina-christi grown
in Oman. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 4(Suppl 2), 656-660.
Bakhtaoui, F. Z., Lakmichi, H., Megraud, F., Chait, A., & Gadhi, C-E. A. (2014). Gastroprotective, Anti-Helicobacter pylori and, Antioxidant Properties of Moroccan Zizyphus lotus
L. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 4 (10), 081-087.
Benammar, C., Hichami, A., Yessoufo, A., Simonin, A. M., Belarbi, M., Allali, H., &
Khan, N. (2010). Zizyphus lotus L. (Desf.) modulates antioxidant activity and human T-cell
proliferation. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 10, 54.
Biglari, F., ALKarkhi, A. F. M., & Easa, A. M. (2008). Antioxidant activity and phenolic
content of various date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) fruits for Iran. Food Chemistry, 107, 16361641.
Borgi, W., & Chouchane, N. (2009). Anti-spasmodic effects of Zizyphus lotus (L.)
Desf.extracts on isolated rat duodenum. Journal of Ethnopharmacology , 126, 571-573.
Borgi, W., Ghedira, K., & Chouchane, N. (2007). Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities
of Zizyphus lotus root barks. Fitoterapia, 78, 16-19.
Cacace, J. E., & Mazza, G. (2002). Extraction of anthocyanins and other phenolics from black
currants with sulfured water. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50, 5939-5946.
Dewanto, V. X., Wu, K., Adom, K., & Liu, R. H. (2002). Thermal processing enhances the
nutritional value of tomatoes by increasing total antioxidant activity. J. Agric. Food Chem, 50,
30103014.
Ferreira, I. C. F. R., Baptista, P., Vilas-Boas, M., & Barros, L. (2007). Free-radical
scavenging capacity and reducing power of wild edible mushrooms from northeast Portugal:
individual cap and stipe activity. Food Chemistry, 100, 1511-1516.
Ghazghazi, H., Aouadhi, C., Riahi, L., Maaroufi, A., & Hasnaoui, B. (2014). Fatty acids
composition of Tunisian Zizyphus lotus L.(Desf.) fruits and variation in biological activities
between leaf and fruit extracts. Natural Product Research, 28, 1106-1110.
Hanato, T., Kagawa, H., Yasuhara, T., & Okuda, T. (1988). Two new flavonoids and other
constituents in licorice root their relative astringency and radical scavenging
effect.Chem.Pharm, 36, 1090-1097.
16
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
Ksouri, R., Megdiche, W., Falleh, H., Trabelsi, N., Boulaaba, M., Smaoui, A., & Abdelly, C.
(2008). Influence of biological, environmental and technical factors on phenolic content and
antioxidant activities of Tunisian halophytes. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 331, 865-873.
Ksouri, R., Megdiche-Ksouri, W., Jallali, I., Debez, A., Magn, C., Hiroko, I., & Abdelly, C.
(2011). Medicinal halophytes: Potent source of health promoting biomolecules with medical,
nutraceutical and food applications. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 138.
Lacopini, P., Baldi, M., Storchi, P., & Sebastiani, L. (2008). Catechin, epicatechin, quercetin,
rutin and resveratrol in grape: Content, in vitro antioxidant activity and interactions. J. Food
Compos. Anal, 21, 589-598.
Le-Floch, E. (1983). Contribution une tude ethnobotanique de la flore de la Tunisie :
Programme Flore et Vgtation Tunisienne. Publications scientifiques Tunisiennes, Tunis,
150-151.
Lim, Y. Y., Lim, T. T., & Tee, J. J. (2007). Antioxidant properties of several tropical fruits: A
comparative study. Food Chemistry, 103, 1003-1008.
Maisuthisakul, P., Suttajit, M., & Pongsawatmanit , R. ( 2007). Assessement of phenolic
content and free radical scavenging capacity of some Thai indigenous plants. Food Chemistry,
100, 1409-1418.
Maraghni, M., Gorai, M., & Neffati, M. (2010). Seed germination at different temperatures
and water stress levels, and seedling emergence from different depths of Zizyphus lotus. South
African Journal of Botany, 76, 453-459.
Mothana, R. A. A. (2011). Anti-inflammatory, antinociceptive and antioxidant activities of
the endemic Soqotraen Boswellia elongata Balf. and Jatropha unicostata Balf. in different
experimental models. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 49, 2594-2599.
Myers, R. H., & Montgomery, D. C. (2002). Response surface methodology: Process and
product optimization using designed experiments (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Okala, A., Ladan, M. J., Wasagu, R. S. U., & Shehu, K. (2014). Phytochemical Studies and In
Vitro Antioxidant Properties of Ziziphus mauritiana Fruit Extract. International Journal of
Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research, 6(4), 885-888.
Pawlowska, A. M., Camangi, F., Bader, A., & Braca, A. (2009). Flavonoids of Zizyphus
jujube L.and Zizyphus Spina-Christi (L.) Willd (Rhamnaceae) fruits. Food Chemistry, 112,
858-862.
Prieto, P., Pineda, M., & Aguillar, M. (1999). Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant
capacity through the formation of phosphomolybdenum complex: specific application to
determination of vitamin E. Anal Biochem, 269, 33741.
Renault, J. H., Ghedira, K., Thepenier, P., Lavaud, C., Zeches-Hanrot, M., & Le Men-Olivier,
L. (1997). Dammarane Saponins from Zizyphus Lotus. Phytochemistry , 44, 1321-1327.
17
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
Richardson, J. E., Chatrou, L. W., Mols, J. B., Erkens, R. H. J., & Pirie, M. D. ( 2004).
Historical biogeography of two cosmopolitan families of flowering plants: Annonaceae and
Rhamnaceae .Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359, 1495-1508.
Suhaj, M. (2006). Spice antioxidants isolation and their antiradical activity: A review. Journal
of Food Composition and Analysis, 19, 531537.
Tsuda, T., Watanabe, M., Ohshima, K., Norinobu, S., Choi, S. W., Kawakishi, S., & Osawa
,T. (1994). Antioxidative activity of the anthocyanin pigments cyanidin 3-O--D-glucoside
and cyaniding,J.Agric. Food Chemistry, 42, 2407-2410.
Wang, J., Sun, B., Cao, Y., Tian, Y., & Li, X. (2008). Optimization of ultrasound-assisted
extraction of phenolic compounds from wheat bran. Food Chemistry, 106, 804-810.
Zhao, Y., Hou, Y., Tang, G., Cai, E., Liu, S., Yang, H., Zhang, L., & Wang, S. (2014).
Optimization of Ultrasonic Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Epimedium brevicornum
Maxim Using Response Surface Methodology and Evaluation of Its Antioxidant Activities In
Vitro. Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry, 2014, 1-7.
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
18
557
Table captions
558
Table 1. Coded levels, Conditions runs and measured responses used in experimental design
559
560
Table 2. Regression coefficients of the predicted second-order polynomial models for the total
561
antioxidant activity, the DPPH scavenging activity and the total phenolic content.
562
Table 3. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the second order polynomial models for the total
563
antioxidant activity (TAA), the DPPH scavenging activity (IC50 ) and the total phenolic
564
content (TPC).
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
19
582
Figure captions
583
Fig.1.Response surface plots (3D,right) and contour plots (2D,left) of total antioxidant activity
584
585
extraction time; (B) extraction temperature and ethanol concentration; (C) solvent to solid
586
ratio and ethanol concentration; (D) solvent to solid ratio and extraction temperature.
587
Fig.2. Response surface plots (3D,right) and contour plots (2D,left) of DPPH free radical
588
589
concentration and extraction time ; (B) extraction temperature and extraction time; (C)
590
Solvent to solid ratio and ethanol concentration; (D) solvent to solid ratio and extraction
591
temperature.
592
Fig.3. Response surface plots (3D,right) and contour plots (2D,left) of total phenolic content
593
594
extraction time ; (B) extraction temperature and ethanol concentration; (C) Solvent to solid
595
ratio and ethanol concentration; (D) solvent to solid ratio and extraction temperature.
596
20
597
598
21
599
600
22
601
602
23
603
Table 1.
Experimentsa
Time
(min), X1
Independent variables
Responses
(C), X3
Solvent/solid
Ratio
(mL/g), X4
YTAAb
(mg
GAE/g
dry
matter)
Ethanol
Concentration
(%), X2
Temperature
YIC50c
(mg/mL)
YTPCd
(mg
GAE/g
dry
matter)
15(-1)
25(-1)
35(-1)
25(-1)
17.840
1.587 12.590
35(+1)
25(-1)
35(-1)
25(-1)
21.650
1.575 14.870
15(-1)
75(+1)
35(-1)
25(-1)
14.562
1.621 10.700
35(+1)
75(+1)
35(-1)
25(-1)
23.007
1.517 15.340
15(-1)
25(-1)
55(+1)
25(-1)
9.507
1.758
6.980
35(+1)
25(-1)
55(+1)
25(-1)
4.507
1.840
2.450
15(-1)
75(+1)
55(+1)
25(-1)
18.793
1.583 13.100
35(+1)
75(+1)
55(+1)
25(-1)
41.859
0.891 28.230
15(-1)
25(-1)
35(-1)
55(+1)
33.505
1.269 19.200
10
35(+1)
25(-1)
35(-1)
55(+1)
26.434
1.455 16.600
11
15(-1)
75(+1)
35(-1)
55(+1)
0.253
12
35(+1)
75(+1)
35(-1)
55(+1)
25.386
1.508 15.980
13
15(-1)
25(-1)
55(+1)
55(+1)
42.513
1.057 25.900
14
35(+1)
25(-1)
55(+1)
55(+1)
46.705
0.543 31.700
15
15(-1)
75(+1)
55(+1)
55(+1)
14.106
1.670
16
35(+1)
75(+1)
55(+1)
55(+1)
65.430
1.107 25.230
17
5(-;-2)
50(0)
45(0)
40(0)
10.843
1.716
18
45(+;+2)
50(0)
45(0)
40(0)
27.986
1.337 17.760
19
25(0)
0(-;-2)
45(0)
40(0)
30.068
1.325 18.890
20
25(0)
100(+;+2)
45(0)
40(0)
3.782
1.900
1.700
21
25(0)
50(0)
25(-;-2)
40(0)
7.782
1.780
6.430
22
25(0)
50(0)
65(+;+2)
40(0)
47.586
1.915
0.160
8.899
8.650
0.850 29.200
24
23
25(0)
50(0)
45(0)
10(-;-2)
10.646
1.750
7.980
24
25(0)
50(0)
45(0)
70(+;+2)
49.620
0.640 30.500
25
25(0)
50(0)
45(0)
40(0)
41.395
1.157 21.530
26
25(0)
50(0)
45(0)
40(0)
44.728
0.985 26.700
27
25(0)
50(0)
45(0)
40(0)
38.986
1.211 21.230
28
25(0)
50(0)
45(0)
40(0)
37.677
1.193 21.400
29
25(0)
50(0)
45(0)
40(0)
32.988
1.245 20.870
604
605
a: Standard order
606
607
608
609
610
611
25
612
Table 2.
613
614
TAA
model
Term
Regression
coefficientsa
Standard
error
t Value
p Value
34.23498
1.31708
25.99299
< 0.00001
5.75767
0.89167
6.45717
0.00296
6.68286
0.89167
7.49476
0.00166
7.52313
0.89167
8.43712
0.00108
11
-3.91092
0.83137
-4.70419
0.00928
22
-4.53330
0.83137
-5.45281
0.00549
12
7.00243
1.09207
6.41207
0.00304
23
4.57351
1.09207
4.18793
0.01383
24
-5.54372
1.09207
-5.07634
0.00710
34
5.34818
1.09207
4.89729
0.00806
1.21817
0.03075
39.60603
< 0.0001
-0.11592
0.02082
-5.56692
0.005100
0.07822
0.02082
3.75648
0.01983
-0.16075
0.02082
-7.72010
0.00151
-0.16945
0.02082
-8.13771
0.00124
11
0.08642
0.01941
4.45124
0.01123
22
0.10804
0.01941
5.56509
0.00510
12
-0.09425
0.02550
-3.69586
0.02091
13
-0.08443
0.02550
-3.31066
0.02963
24
0.18906
0.02550
7.41334
0.00176
IC50 model
26
34
-0.09635
0.02550
-3.77806
0.01947
20.39293
0.737658
27.64552
< 0.0001
2.96212
0.499397
5.93141
0.004049
-1.95963
0.499397
-3.92398
0.017190
3.44121
0.499397
6.89073
0.002325
3.51871
0.499397
7.04592
0.002139
11
-1.94096
0.465624
-4.16851
0.014048
22
-2.66846
0.465624
-5.73093
0.004591
12
3.18569
0.611634
5.20849
0.006478
23
1.84431
0.611634
3.01539
0.039341
24
-4.60069
0.611634
-7.52197
0.001672
34
2.65806
0.611634
4.34584
0.012197
TPC
model
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
27
623
TAA (R2=0.8255)
Source of
SS
DF
MS
F Value
P Value
Regression
6284.03800
698.22646
9.17556
<0.0001
Residuals
1445.83063
19
76.09634
Lack of fit
1369.50325
15
91.30021
4.78466
0.07059
Pure error
76.32738
19.08184
Total
7729.86863
28
9.00137
<0.0001
4.22161
0.08715
8.07704
<0.0001
4.64275
0.07451
variation
624
Table 3.
IC50 (R2=0.8466)
Regression
3.28372
10
0.32837
Residuals
0.65664
18
0.03648
Lack of fit
0.61502
14
0.04393
Pure error
0.04162
0.0104
Total
3.94036
28
Regression
1853,20231
10
185.32023
Residuals
412,99337
18
22.94407
Lack of fit
389,05125
14
27.78937
Pure error
23,94212
5.98553
Total
2266,19568
28
TPC(R =0.8303)
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
28
List of abbreviations
634
635
DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
mg GAE/g dry matter: milligram of gallic acid equivalents per gram of dry matter
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
29
661
662
663
664
665
666
30