You are on page 1of 20

20142 1 77-96

Labov

Ricoeur
Ricoeur Labov

1980
1990

2007

2013

LieblichTuval-Mashiach Zilber1998

Ricoeur

20002002Ricoeur, 1969/2008
Ricoeur

102 6 22 101

Emailshl.being@gmail.com

78

20142 1

sensereference

2000

/Ricoeur

2002Ricoeur, 1969/2008

1994

Labov
fully formedabstract
orientation
complicating action
evaluation
resolution

codaLabov, 1972; Labov & Waletzky, 1967

Riessman, 1993
Labov1972

Labov1972
2010
Labov1972
Labov1972
19972007
1996

44

2012
Labov1972

Labov
1972

Ricoeur
/
/
2009Ricoeur,
1975/2004Ricoeur

20142 1

79

Ricoeur, 1975/2004

Ricoeur, 1981/2011

Bruner, 1990; Riessman,


1993

Ricoeur
Labov1972

2010

Clandinin & Connelly, 2000

Crossley, 2000

Lieblich 1998

Ricoeur
Labov1972

80

20142 1


Ricoeur
Labov1972

1
2
3

B1-5

B1-5B1-5

Labov1972
Labov
Labov, 1972; Labov & Waletzky, 1967

1. /

2.

3.

20142 1

81

4.

5.

6. /

Labov1972
2

B1-4B1-5

82

20142 1

B1-4

85 C

85 C

85 C

85 C

20142 1

B1-5

83

B1-4B1-4
B1-5B1-5

1
2

84

20142 1

85 C


3
/
/ 3

20142 1

85

1.

B4-46

B4-46

2.

1
A

86
20142 1

87

20142 1

A
A

A A

Koski & Steinberg, 1990

Kerig, Cowan, & Cowan, 1993

2005 37

A
A
A

B4-16
A

A
A

88

20142 1

A
A
A

A A

A
A

2005
A

Woollett &
Marshall, 2001
A

A
A
A

20142 1

89

A
A

Labov1972

1.
Lieblich 1998
Labov1972

Lieblich Labov

4
Labov1972

90

20142 1

2.
Lieblich 1998

Labov1972

Labov1972

3.

unpackingRiessman,
1993Lieblich 1998

Labov1972

Lieblich 1998

5 Lieblich 1998

20142 1

91

5
Lieblich
Lieblich

A
A

A A


Bruner, 1990

Riessman1993
persuasiveness
correspondence
coherence
pragmatic
use

92

20142 1

2013

trustworthiness

significance
2013

1.

2.

20142 1

93

1.

2.

3.

Ricoeur
Labov

94

20142 1

Riessman1993

Riessman1993

()

Riessman1993

2013 5 9

http://www.mhat.org.tw/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=132&Ite
mid=53
2012

100NCUE5464011

2011
Ricoeur, P.

1981
2009
362
151-177
2007 10

1997

085FJU03501007
2010

83
165-180
2004
Ricoeur, P.

1975
2000

2013 5 8
-
http://narrativeresearch.ndhu.edu.tw/main.php
2007
--

095NCUE5464036
2005

201-40
2002

20142 1

95

2008
Ricoeur, P.

1969
1994

1996
2977-116
2005
2041-91
2013

101NCUE5464009
2010

098NKNU5464010
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in
qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Crossley, M. L. (2000). Introducing narrative psychology: Self, trauma and the construction
of meaning. Buckinghamshire, England: Open University Press.
Kerig, P. K., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (1993). Marital quality and gender differences in
parent-child interaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 931-939.
Koski, K. J., & Steinberg, L. (1990). Parenting satisfaction of mothers during midlife. Journal
of Youth and Adolescence, 19(5), 465-474.
Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In W. Labov (Ed.),
Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular (pp. 354-396).
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience.
In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12-44). Seattle: University of
Washington Press.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis,
and interpretation. Tousand Oaks: Sage.
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
Woollett, A., & Marshall, H. (2001). Motherhood and mothering. In R. K. Unger (Eds.),
Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 170-182). New York: John Wiley
& Sons.
: 2013 5 19
:2013 6 23
:2013 9 9
: 2013 9 9

96

20142 1

Narrative Analysis: The Method Combined of


Labov's Narrative Structure and Metaphorical
Stories
Su-Chin Tsai

Ya-Feng Hung

Shu-Hui Liu

National Chung Hsing


University

National Taichung
University of Education

National Changhua
University of Education

Abstract
Contemporary narrative research has been widely used in different domains of research, but
the vagueness of the text analysis imposes challenges for the researchers to grasp the precise
meaning of the text. French philosopher Ricoeur advocates that the understanding of human
existence should take the detour path from semantics and reflection to an existing level. In
this study a method has been developed to display a clearer narrative analysis process and
strategies to grasp the meaning of the text. The method is founded onRicoeurs view with a
combination of Labovs narrative structure analysis as the semantics-analytical method and
metaphorical storiesas the meaning-reflection method. The main function of this method is to
help researchers get rid of the limitations of personal subjectivity, approximating the meaning
of the narrative through text. Besides, researchers can also combine with other operation
strategies proposed in this study to enhance the quality of the narrative analysis results.

Keywords: Ricoeur, narrative analysis, narrative structure, metaphorical


stories

You might also like