Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Labov
Ricoeur
Ricoeur Labov
1980
1990
2007
2013
LieblichTuval-Mashiach Zilber1998
Ricoeur
20002002Ricoeur, 1969/2008
Ricoeur
102 6 22 101
Emailshl.being@gmail.com
78
20142 1
sensereference
2000
/Ricoeur
2002Ricoeur, 1969/2008
1994
Labov
fully formedabstract
orientation
complicating action
evaluation
resolution
Riessman, 1993
Labov1972
Labov1972
2010
Labov1972
Labov1972
19972007
1996
44
2012
Labov1972
Labov
1972
Ricoeur
/
/
2009Ricoeur,
1975/2004Ricoeur
20142 1
79
Ricoeur, 1975/2004
Ricoeur, 1981/2011
Ricoeur
Labov1972
2010
Crossley, 2000
Lieblich 1998
Ricoeur
Labov1972
80
20142 1
Ricoeur
Labov1972
1
2
3
B1-5
B1-5B1-5
Labov1972
Labov
Labov, 1972; Labov & Waletzky, 1967
1. /
2.
3.
20142 1
81
4.
5.
6. /
Labov1972
2
B1-4B1-5
82
20142 1
B1-4
85 C
85 C
85 C
85 C
20142 1
B1-5
83
B1-4B1-4
B1-5B1-5
1
2
84
20142 1
85 C
3
/
/ 3
20142 1
85
1.
B4-46
B4-46
2.
1
A
86
20142 1
87
20142 1
A
A
A A
2005 37
A
A
A
B4-16
A
A
A
88
20142 1
A
A
A
A A
A
A
2005
A
Woollett &
Marshall, 2001
A
A
A
A
20142 1
89
A
A
Labov1972
1.
Lieblich 1998
Labov1972
Lieblich Labov
4
Labov1972
90
20142 1
2.
Lieblich 1998
Labov1972
Labov1972
3.
unpackingRiessman,
1993Lieblich 1998
Labov1972
Lieblich 1998
5 Lieblich 1998
20142 1
91
5
Lieblich
Lieblich
A
A
A A
Bruner, 1990
Riessman1993
persuasiveness
correspondence
coherence
pragmatic
use
92
20142 1
2013
trustworthiness
significance
2013
1.
2.
20142 1
93
1.
2.
3.
Ricoeur
Labov
94
20142 1
Riessman1993
Riessman1993
()
Riessman1993
2013 5 9
http://www.mhat.org.tw/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=132&Ite
mid=53
2012
100NCUE5464011
2011
Ricoeur, P.
1981
2009
362
151-177
2007 10
1997
085FJU03501007
2010
83
165-180
2004
Ricoeur, P.
1975
2000
2013 5 8
-
http://narrativeresearch.ndhu.edu.tw/main.php
2007
--
095NCUE5464036
2005
201-40
2002
20142 1
95
2008
Ricoeur, P.
1969
1994
1996
2977-116
2005
2041-91
2013
101NCUE5464009
2010
098NKNU5464010
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in
qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Crossley, M. L. (2000). Introducing narrative psychology: Self, trauma and the construction
of meaning. Buckinghamshire, England: Open University Press.
Kerig, P. K., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (1993). Marital quality and gender differences in
parent-child interaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 931-939.
Koski, K. J., & Steinberg, L. (1990). Parenting satisfaction of mothers during midlife. Journal
of Youth and Adolescence, 19(5), 465-474.
Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In W. Labov (Ed.),
Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular (pp. 354-396).
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience.
In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12-44). Seattle: University of
Washington Press.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis,
and interpretation. Tousand Oaks: Sage.
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
Woollett, A., & Marshall, H. (2001). Motherhood and mothering. In R. K. Unger (Eds.),
Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 170-182). New York: John Wiley
& Sons.
: 2013 5 19
:2013 6 23
:2013 9 9
: 2013 9 9
96
20142 1
Ya-Feng Hung
Shu-Hui Liu
National Taichung
University of Education
National Changhua
University of Education
Abstract
Contemporary narrative research has been widely used in different domains of research, but
the vagueness of the text analysis imposes challenges for the researchers to grasp the precise
meaning of the text. French philosopher Ricoeur advocates that the understanding of human
existence should take the detour path from semantics and reflection to an existing level. In
this study a method has been developed to display a clearer narrative analysis process and
strategies to grasp the meaning of the text. The method is founded onRicoeurs view with a
combination of Labovs narrative structure analysis as the semantics-analytical method and
metaphorical storiesas the meaning-reflection method. The main function of this method is to
help researchers get rid of the limitations of personal subjectivity, approximating the meaning
of the narrative through text. Besides, researchers can also combine with other operation
strategies proposed in this study to enhance the quality of the narrative analysis results.