Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Geoderma
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s e v i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / g e o d e r m a
Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen as affected by vegetation types in Northern
Loess Plateau of China
Xiaoli Fu a,b, Mingan Shao a,, Xiaorong Wei a, Robert Horton c
a
State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences & Ministry of Water Resources,
Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
b
Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
c
Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 7 February 2009
Received in revised form 29 October 2009
Accepted 22 November 2009
Available online 31 December 2009
Keywords:
Soil organic carbon
Total nitrogen
Vegetation type
Northern Loess Plateau
a b s t r a c t
One of the most fragile areas in the China Loess Plateau, is the transitional belt that is subjected to wind and
water erosion. The transitional belt accounts for about 30% of the Loess Plateau area. To reduce soil
degradation in the Loess Plateau, the Chinese government initiated a state-funded vegetation restoration
project in 1999. The effectiveness of this project on transitional belt soils is unknown. The objective of this
study is to determine the effects of four dominant vegetation types on soil organic carbon (SOC) and nitrogen
(N) in a selected catchment within the transitional belt. Korshinsk Peashrub (KOP), purple alfalfa (ALF), and
natural fallow (NAF) were selected as vegetation restoration types because they have been used widely to
remedy soil degradation. The fourth vegetation type selected was millet (MIL) because it has been an
important crop in the region. In 2004, four 61 5 m plots were established on 12 slope land. The plots were
parallel and separated by 80 cm. Based upon soil samples collected in August of 2007, there were large
variations in the distributions and stocks of SOC and N across the four vegetation types. Compared with MIL,
KOP signicantly increased the concentration and stock of SOC and total nitrogen (TN) in 0100 cm soil
proles, while ALF and NAF were not signicantly different. The distributions of SOC and TN concentrations
and stocks of KOP, ALF and NAF were relatively uniform along a hillslope, while there was an increasing
trend along the hillslope in MIL. This result suggests that ALF and NAF would be benecial in SOC and TN
sequestration over a long-term because of their ability to reduce the loss of SOC and TN by soil erosion. We
also found that both vegetation types and hillslope position had no signicant effects on C:N ratio. Our study
demonstrated that improvements of SOC and TN stocks in the transitional belt could be made through well
managed vegetation restoration measures.
2009 Published by Elsevier B.V.
1. Introduction
The biogeochemical cycles of carbon and nitrogen in terrestrial
ecosystems have received increasing attention worldwide over the
past decade, because the emission of their oxides into atmosphere
plays an important role in driving global warming. Soil organic carbon
(SOC) is a major component of the terrestrial carbon (C) pool, with
the amount of C being as much as two to three times more than in
living vegetation (Post and Kwon, 2000). Moreover, changes in the
SOC pool can inuence the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere
(Smith, 2008). Understanding the sequestration potential of SOC is
crucial for developing effective management approaches for reducing
atmospheric CO2 concentrations.
Many factors impact the biogeochemical cycling of SOC, and
consequentially impact the distribution and stock of SOC. One
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: mashao@ms.iswc.ac.cn (M. Shao).
0016-7061/$ see front matter 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V.
doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.11.020
32
Table 1
Selected soil physical and chemical properties for 020 cm soil layer. SOC and Ks are soil
organic carbon and saturated hydraulic conductivity, respectively.
Clay
(%)
Silt
(%)
Sand
(%)
SOC
(g kg 1)
Bulk density
(g cm3)
Field capacity
(g g1)
Ks
(mm min 1)
15.6
44.0
40.4
1.62
1.48
0.19
0.94
33
Table 2
Soil organic carbon (SOC) (g kg 1) at different soil depths and hillslope positions for
Korshinsk Peashrub (KOP), purple alfalfa (ALF), fallow (NAF) and millet (MIL). Values
followed by different lower-case letters within columns and upper-case letters within
rows are signicantly different at P b 0.05.
KOP
Depth (cm)
020
2.11aA
2040
1.74aA
4060
1.72aA
6080
1.20bA
80100
1.29bA
Hillslope position (020 cm)
Upper
1.96a
Mid
2.20a
Lower
2.18a
ALF
NAF
MIL
1.34aB
1.13acB
0.93bcB
0.83bcAB
0.80bB
1.23aB
0.90bB
0.82bB
0.81bB
0.84bB
1.79aA
1.10bB
0.98bB
0.86bAB
0.82bB
1.15a
1.12a
1.74a
1.40a
0.98a
1.32a
1.24b
2.01a
2.11a
3.2. TN
The effects of soil depth, vegetation restoration type and hillslope
position on TN were similar to, though somewhat different from,
those on soil organic carbon (Table 3). Consistent with SOC, the TN of
KOP was signicantly larger in the 060 cm soil layer than in the 60
100 cm soil layer. However, TN of the 020 cm layer was signicantly
larger than that of the 60100 cm soil layer for ALF and the 4060 cm
soil layer for NAF and MIL, and statistically comparable to the value of
the 2040 cm soil layer. The KOP had signicantly larger TN with an
average value of 0.20 g kg 1 (0100 cm layer) compared with the
other vegetation restoration types which had average values less than
0.13 g kg 1 (0100 cm layer). Specically, KOP resulted in a TN increase
of approximately 30% for the 020 cm layer, 80% for the 2060 cm layer,
and 45 to 60% for the 60100 cm layer compared with MIL. The ALF and
NAF had no signicant increases in TN at all soil depths in the 0100 cm
soil prole. There was a trend of larger TN accumulated at the lower
position in MIL in the 020 cm soil layer, and signicantly larger TN was
observed at the mid- and lower positions by comparison with the values
from the upper hillslope position. For KOP, ALF and NAF, however, the
distribution of TN in the 020 cm soil layer was relatively uniform, and
hillslope position had no signicant effect on TN.
3.3. Soil carbon/nitrogen (C:N) ratios
The C:N ratios did not vary much with respect to soil depth,
vegetation type or hillslope position (Table 4). For KOP and MIL, the
C:N ratio of the 020 cm layer was signicantly larger than for the
other layers. For ALF and NAF, however, the C:N ratio was similar at all
depths. There were no signicant differences in the C:N ratio between
KOP, ALF, NAF and MIL for any layer. Hillslope position also had no
signicant effect on the C:N ratio of the 020 cm layers for the
vegetation types.
Table 3
Total nitrogen (TN) (g kg 1) at different soil depths and hillslope positions for
Korshinsk Peashrub (KOP), purple alfalfa (ALF), fallow (NAF) and millet (MIL). Values
followed by different lower-case letters within columns and upper-case letters within
rows are signicantly different at P b 0.05.
KOP
Depth (cm)
020
0.23aA
2040
0.22aA
4060
0.22aA
6080
0.16bA
80100
0.16bA
Hillslope position (020 cm)
Upper
0.22a
Mid
0.24a
lower
0.23a
ALF
NAF
MIL
0.15aBC
0.15abB
0.12abB
0.11bB
0.11bB
0.15aC
0.13abB
0.11bB
0.11bB
0.11bB
0.18aB
0.13abB
0.12bB
0.11bB
0.10bB
0.15a
0.13a
0.18a
0.14a
0.15a
0.16a
0.13b
0.22a
0.21a
34
Table 4
Soil carbon (C):nitrogen (N) ratios at different soil depths and hillslope positions for
Korshinsk Peashrub (KOP), purple alfalfa (ALF), fallow (NAF) and millet (MIL). Values
followed by different lower-case letters within columns and upper-case letters within
rows are signicantly different at P b 0.05.
KOP
Depth (cm)
020
9.30aA
2040
8.19bA
4060
8.07bA
6080
7.67bA
80100
7.97bA
Hillslope position(020 cm)
Upper
8.89a
Mid
9.30a
Lower
9.74a
ALF
NAF
8.64aA
7.50aA
8.92aA
7.90aA
7.61aA
MIL
8.60aA
7.32aA
7.69aA
7.57aA
7.89aA
7.43a
8.72a
9.76a
9.17aA
8.33bA
8.04bA
8.21bA
8.17bA
10.20a
7.38a
8.22a
10.01a
9.28a
9.83a
Table 5
Soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) stocks (kg m 2) in 020, 0100 cm
depths and at different hillslope positions for Korshinsk Peashrub (KOP), purple alfalfa
(ALF), fallow (NAF) and millet (MIL). Overall means are SOC and TN with respect to 0
20 cm and 0100 cm depth, respectively for KOP, ALF, NAF and MIL. Values followed by
different lower-case letters within columns and upper-case letters within rows are
signicantly different at P b 0.05.
Depth (cm)
Hillslope position
KOP
ALF
NAF
MIL
SOC
020
TN
0100
020
Upper
Mid
Lower
Overall
Over all
Upper
Mid
Lower
Overall
Overall
0.55a
0.62a
0.61a
0.59A
2.14A
0.06a
0.07a
0.06a
0.06A
0.29A
0.33a
0.32a
0.50a
0.38B
1.47B
0.04a
0.04a
0.05a
0.04B
0.18B
0.41a
0.28a
0.38a
0.36B
1.35B
0.04a
0.04a
0.05a
0.04B
0.18B
0.30b
0.49a
0.51a
0.43B
1.48B
0.03b
0.05a
0.05a
0.04B
0.17B
0100
Table 6
Aboveground biomass, plant nitrogen (N) concentration and N pools for Korshinsk
Peashrub (KOP), purple alfalfa (ALF), and millet (MIL). Values followed by different
upper-case letters within rows are signicantly different at P b 0.05.
Aboveground biomass(kg m )
Aboveground plant N concentration (g kg 1)
Aboveground N pool (g m 2)
KOP
ALF
MIL
0.31A
74.41A
23.24A
0.24A
20.85B
5.05B
0.09B
14.80C
1.25C
4. Discussion
4.1. Effects of vegetation types on SOC
The SOC stocks, in the transitional belt area of the Loess Plateau,
were apparently smaller than the average values across China (Wu
et al., 2003; Yu et al., 2007b), but were comparable to the values of
desert ecosystem classes and to areas where the site conditions were
similar to the present study site (Bationo and Buerkert, 2001; Yu et al.,
2007a). The relatively small SOC was caused by severe soil erosion,
low biomass productivity resulting from low and erratic rainfall, and
low soil water-holding capacities at the study site.
Although the SOC for all four vegetation types were relatively small,
the vegetation restoration (KOP, ALF and NAF) still affected SOC
distributions and stocks in varying degrees in our study. The KOP
signicantly improved SOC concentration and stock both in the 020 cm
soil layer and in the entire 0100 cm soil prole through 4 years of
restoration, compared with the other three vegetation types. This result
is partly in agreement with that of Chen et al. (2007). They reported that
shrubland was more effective in SOC improvement than grassland
during the vegetation restoration program, while vegetation restoration
had no signicant effect on the SOC sequestration in the deeper soil
layers. The reason that SOC of ALF and NAF was signicantly lower than
that of KOP can be explained by differences in the above and below
ground biomass (Yimer et al., 2007). The maximum aboveground
biomass of KOP was signicantly larger than that of ALF (Table 6); and
the ne root density of KOP was greater than that of ALF, based on
previous studies (Cheng et al., 2007; Cheng et al., 2008). Moreover, ALF
was cut near the soil surface each year in this study, meaning that the
input of SOC in terms of litter-fall was relatively small. The result that
signicant sequestration of SOC in soils (KOP) within four growing years
in the present study was inconsistent with the nding of Vesterdal et al.
(2002) who reported that afforestation did not have signicant effects
on SOC within 30 years, based on a nutrient-rich soil. Our result was in
agreement with Zhou et al. (2007) who found that land use types
altered the level of soil C store after only 3 years of land use conversion,
based on a soil with low clay content. It seems that the rapid enrichment
of SOC in the present study is associated with the soil characteristics of
low native fertility and loess parent materials. There are interactions
between soil mineralogy and soil organic carbon (Torn et al., 1997), and
the rate of C sequestration can be accelerated due to the slower
decomposition rates in some soils (Vesterdal et al., 2002).
ALF and NAF, compared with MIL, did not show much potential to
increase SOC in our study. The distributions of SOC concentration and
stock from KOP, ALF and NAF were all relatively uniform along the
hillslope compared with the accumulation trend at the lower position
for MIL. The accumulation of SOC at the lower position in the 020 cm
layer is likely caused by soil erosion and sediment deposition, because
erosion transports soil materials from the upper positions to the lower
positions. SOC losses can accompany the soil losses (Gregorich et al.,
1998; Polyakov and Lal, 2004). Studies at the same experimental plots
showed that the runoff coefcient and erosion rates of MIL were
greater than those of KOP, ALF and NAF (Zeng, 2006). The greater soil
erosion rates along with the relatively high concentration of SOC in
the 020 cm soil layer suggested that more SOC could be lost in future
surface runoff, and that the soil under MIL could become less fertile.
35
References
Bationo, A., Buerkert, A., 2001. Soil organic carbon management for sustainable land use
in Sudano-Sahelian West Africa. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 61, 131142.
Chen, L., Gong, J., Fu, B., Huang, Z., Huang, Y., Gui, L., 2007. Effect of land use conversion
on soil organic carbon sequestration in the loess hilly area, loess plateau of China.
Ecol. Res. 22, 641648.
Cheng, X., Huang, M., Shao, M., 2007. Vertical distribution of representative plantation's
ne root in windwater erosion crisscross region, Shenmu. Acta. Bot. BorealOccident
Sin. 27, 321327, in Chinese.
Cheng, X., Huang, M., Shao, M., Warrington, D.N., 2008. A comparison of ne root
distribution and water consumption of mature Caragana korshinkii Kom grown in
two soils in a semiarid region, China. Plant Soil. doi:10.1007/s11104-008-9739-5.
Eaton, J.M., McGoff, N.M., Byrne, K.A., Leahy, P., Kiely, G., 2008. Land cover change and
soil organic carbon stocks in the Republic of Ireland 18512000. Clim. Change.
doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9412-2.
Grandy, A.S., Robertson, G.P., 2007. Land-use intensity effects on soil organic carbon
accumulation rates and mechanisms. Ecosystems 10, 5873.
Gregorich, E.G., Greer, K.J., Anderson, D.W., Liang, B.C., 1998. Carbon distribution and
losses: erosion and deposition effects. Soil Tillage Res. 47, 291302.
Hou, Q., Tang, K., 1994. The characteristics of the ecologic environment in the contiguous
areas of Shanxi, Shaanxi and Nei Menggu. Bull. Soil Water Conserv. 14, 815 (in Chinese).
Kuo, S., Sainju, U.M., Jellum, E.J., 1997. Winter cover cropping inuence on nitrogen in
soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 13921399.
Martnez-mena, M., Rogel, J.A., Castillo, V., Albaladejo, J., 2002. Organic carbon and
nitrogen losses inuenced by vegetation removal in a semiarid Mediterranean soil.
Biogeochemistry 61, 309321.
Moges, A., Holden, N.M., 2008. Soil fertility in relation to hillslope position and
agricultural land use: a case study of Umbulo Catchment in southern Ethiopia.
Environ. Manage. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9157-8.
Polyakov, V., Lal, R., 2004. Modeling soil organic matter dynamics as affected by soil
water erosion. Environment International 30, 547556.
Post, W.M., Kwon, K.C., 2000. Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: processes
and potential. Global. Change Biol. 6, 317327.
Powers, J.S., 2004. Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen after contrasting land-use
transitions in northeastern Costa Rica. Ecosystems 7, 134146.
Puget, P., Lal, R., 2005. Soil organic carbon and nitrogen in a Mollisol in central Ohio as
affected by tillage and land use. Soil Tillage Res. 80, 201213.
Rodrguez-Murillo, J.C., 2001. Organic carbon content under different types of land use
and soil in peninsular Spain. Biol. Fertil. Soils 33, 5361.
Sainju, U.M., Senwo, Z.N., Nyakatawa, E.Z., Tazisong, I.A., Reddy, K.C., 2008. Soil carbon
and nitrogen sequestration as affected by long-term tillage, cropping systems, and
nitrogen fertilizer sources. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 127, 234240.
Smith, P., 2008. Land use change and soil organic carbon dynamics. Nutr. Cycl.
Agroecosys. 81, 169178.
Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H., Kumar, P., McCarl, B., Ogle, S., O'Mara, F.,
Rice, C., Scholes, B., Sirotenko, O., Howden, M., McAllister, T., Pan, G., Romanenkov, V.,
Schneider, U., Towprayoon, S., 2007. Policy and technological constraints to
implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst.
Environ. 118, 628.
Solomon, D., Lehmann, J., Zech, W., 2000. Land use effects on soil organic matter
properties of chromic luvisols in semi-arid northern Tanzania: carbon, nitrogen,
lignin and carbohydrates. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 78, 203213.
Song, G., Li, L., Pan, G., Zhang, Q., 2005. Topsoil organic carbon storage of China and its
loss by cultivation. Biogeochemistry 74, 4762.
Tang, K.L., 2000. Importance and urgency of harnessing the interlocked area with both
water and wind erosion in the Loess Plateau. Soil Water Conserv. China 11, 1112
17, in Chinese.
Torn, M.S., Trumbore, S.E., Chadwick, O.A., Vitousek, P.M., Hendricks, D.M., 1997.
Mineral control of soil organic carbon storage and turnover. Nature 389, 170173.
Vesterdal, L., Ritter, E., Gundersen, P., 2002. Change in soil organic carbon following
afforestation of former arable land. Fores. Ecol. Manage. 169, 137147.
Wu, H.B., Guo, Z.T., Peng, C.H., 2003. Land use induced changes of organic carbon
storage in soils of China. Glob. Change Biol. 9, 305315.
Yimer, F., Ledin, S., Abdelkadir, A., 2006. Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks as
affected by topographic aspect and vegetation in the Bale Mountains, Ethiopia.
Geoderma 135, 335344.
Yimer, F., Ledin, S., Abdelkadir, A., 2007. Changes in soil organic carbon and total
nitrogen contents in three adjacent land use types in the Bale Mountains, southeastern highlands of Ethiopia. Fores. Ecol. Manage. 242, 337342.
Yu, D.S., Shi, X.Z., Wang, H.J., Sun, W.X., Chen, J.M., Liu, Q.H., Zhao, Y.C., 2007a. Regional
patterns of soil organic carbon stocks in China. J. Environ. Manage. 85, 680689.
Yu, D., Shi, X., Wang, H., Sun, W., Warner, E.D., Liu, Q., 2007b. National scale analysis of
soil organic carbon storage in China based on Chinese soil taxonomy. Pedosphere
17, 1118.
Zeng, C., 2006. Study on the soil water cycle on hillslope with different conditions of
vegetation covering in waterwind erosion crisscross region. Master thesis,
Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi China, (in Chinese).
Zhou, Z., Sun, O.J., Huang, J., Li, L., Liu, P., Han, X., 2007. Soil carbon and nitrogen stores
and storage potential as affected by land-use in an agro-pastoral ecotone of
northern China. Biogeochemistry 82, 127138.