Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Passivity
As mentioned above, the reason for the good corrosion resistance of stainless steels is that they
form a very thin, invisible surface film in oxidizing environments. This film is an oxide that
protects the steel from attack in an aggressive environment. As chromium is added to steel, a
rapid reduction in corrosion rate is observed to around 10% because of the formation of this
protective layer or passive film. In order to obtain a compact and continuous passive film, a
chromium content of about 17% is needed. This is the reason why many stainless steels contain
17-18% chromium.
Some of the standard grades contain a quantity of sulfur deliberately greater than the typical
0.003 that can otherwise routinely be achieved with modern steel-making processes (the free
machining grades).
Nickel significantly improves the general corrosion resistance of stainless steels, by promoting
passivation. The austenitic stainless steels series therefore possesses a corrosion resistance
superior to that of martensitic or ferritic stainless steels (no nickel), particularly with mineral acids.
Pitting corrosion is the result of the local destruction of the passive film and subsequent
corrosion of the steel below. It generally occurs in chloride, halide or bromide solutions. If a fault
in the passive layer or a surface defect results in the local destruction of the former, dissolution of
the steel underneath leads to a build-up of positively charged metallic ions, which in turn causes
negatively charges (e.g. chloride ions) to migrate near the defect. Even in a neutral solution, this
can cause the pH to drop locally to 2 or 3, and can prevent regeneration of the passive layer.
In the passive condition, the current density is in the scale of nanoampers/cm 2; in the pit,
however, it may be above 1A/cmp2. Similarly, the concentration in chloride ions can be
thousands of times greater than that in the solution.
Street furniture is another case where pitting resistance might be relevant, particularly in colder
areas where salt de-icing is common.
Date Published: Sep-2008
Like all metals and alloys that relay on a passive film for corrosion resistance,
stainless steels are susceptible to localized corrosion, i.e. pitting or crevice corrosion.
Both these types of corrosion usually occur in chloride-containing aqueous solutions
such as sea water, but can also take place in environments containing other
halogenides.
Crevice corrosion occurs in narrow, solution-containing crevices in which the passive film is
more readily weakened and destroyed. This may be under washers, flanges, deposits or fouling
on the steel surface.
Crevice corrosion can be a result of differences in oxygen or metal ion concentration between the
crevice and its surroundings. Local differences in composition of a solution cause potential
differences on an immersed metal and thus accelerate corrosion. Of particular importance in this
respect are differences in oxygen content, commonly known as differential aeration.
Crevice corrosion is usually attributed to one or more of the following aspects:
Figure 2: Crevice corrosion under a rubber washer in a flat heat exchanger used in brackish
water.
Both forms of corrosion occur in neutral environments, although the risk for attack increases in
acidic solutions.
Chromium, molybdenum and nitrogen are the alloying elements that increase the resistance of
stainless steels to both pitting and crevice corrosion. Resistance to localized corrosion in sea
water requires 6% molybdenum or more.
One way of combining the effect of alloying elements is via the so-called Pitting Resistance
Equivalent (PRE) which takes into account the different effects of chromium, molybdenum and
nitrogen. There are several equations for the Pitting Resistance Equivalent, all with slightly
different coefficients for molybdenum and nitrogen. One of the most commonly used formulas is
the following:
PRE = %Cr + 3.3 x %Mo + 16 x %N
This formula is almost always used for the duplex steels but it is also sometimes applied to
austenitic steels. However, for the latter category the value of the coefficient for nitrogen is also
often set to 30, while the other coefficients are unchanged. This gives the following formula:
PRE = %Cr + 3.3 x %Mo + 30 x %N
The difference between the formulas is generally small but the higher coefficient for nitrogen will
give a difference in the PRE-value for the nitrogen alloyed grades.
Table 1: Typical PRE-values for various stainless steels
26
30
30
35
36
37
43
43
56
46
63
The effect of composition can be illustrated by plotting the critical pitting temperature (CPT) in a
specific environment against the PRE-values for a number of steel grades. The Figure 3 shows
the critical pitting temperature (CPT) in 1M NaCl as a function of PRE-values. The CPT values
are the lowest temperatures at which pitting corrosion attack occurred during testing.
Figure 4: Critical pitting temperature (CPT) and critical crevice corrosion temperature (CCT) in
ferric chloride for various stainless steels.
As can be seen from the diagrams in Figures 3 and 4 there is a relatively good correlation
between the PRE-values and the CPT and CCT. Consequently the PRE-value can be used to
group steel grades and alloys into rough groups of materials with similar resistance to localized
corrosion attack, in steps of 10 units in PRE-value or so. However, it cannot be used to compare
or separate steel grades or alloys with almost similar PRE values.
Finally, it must be emphasized that all diagrams of this type show comparisons between steel
grades and are only valid for a given test environment. Note that the steel grades have different
CPTs in NaCl (Figure 3) and FeCl3 (Figure 4). The temperatures in the diagrams cannot
therefore be applied to other environments, unless there is a practical experience that shows the
relation between the actual service conditions and the testing conditions.
The relative ranking of localized corrosion resistance is, however, often the same even in other
environments. The closer the test environment is to the natural environment, i.e. the closer the
test environment simulates the principal factors of the service environment, the more can the
data generated in it be relied on when judging the suitability of a certain steel grade for a specific
service environment. A test in sodium chloride is consequently better than a test in ferric chloride
for judging whether or not a certain grade is suitable for one of the neutral pH, chloride containing
water solutions which are common in many industries.
In order to obtain a good resistance to both pitting and crevice corrosion, it is necessary to
choose a highly alloyed stainless steel with a sufficiently high molybdenum content. However,
choosing the right grades is not the only way to minimize the risk for localized corrosion attack.
The risk for these types of corrosion attack can be reduced at the design stage by avoiding
stagnant conditions and narrow crevices. The designer can thus minimize the risk for pitting and
crevice corrosion both by choosing the correct steel grade and by appropriate design of the
equipment.
Date Published: Oct-2008
Solution heat treatment: heating to a temperature above 1900F (1040C) followed by quenching (rapid cooling)
in water or quenching oils. During the heating stage the carbides dissolve and their formation is suppressed by
fast cooling.
Lowering concentration of carbon. Sensitization is depressed in low carbon (max. 0.03%) stainless steels,
designated with the suffix L (304L, 316L).
Stabilization by carbide forming elements. Formation of chromium carbides is avoided in stabilized austenitic
stainless steels (321, 347) containing carbide forming elements like titanium, niobium, tantalum, zirconium.
Stabilization heat treatment of such steels results in preferred formation of carbides of the stabilizing elements
instead of chromium carbides.
Date Published: Dec-2008