Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HARSHA 1
CASE REVIEW
MOLLERE V. SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA COLLEGE
CHAPTER 5, PAGE 136-137
K. HARSHA 2
was not placed on male students of the same age range. Was placing a financial obligation of
living on campus only on one group of students constitutional? Was the response of requiring
female students under the age of 21 years a legitimate answer?
CONCLUSION
The case of MOLLERE V. SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA COLLEGE changed the
way that student groups were selected for certain requirements (such as living on campus)
K. HARSHA 3
placing an additional financial obligation on only one certain group of individuals. From this
case, all or no students must take on the financial obligation combined with their tuition and fees.