Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Model
1
Variables
Removed
fathers_edu
cation_level
, gender,
mother_edu
cation_level
Method
. Enter
.465a
Std. Error of
Adjusted R
the
R Square
Square
Estimate
.216
.132
.861
ANOVAb
Sum of
Squares
Model
1
Regressio
n
Mean
Square
Df
5.728
1.909
Residual
20.741
28
.741
Total
26.469
31
Sig.
.074a
2.577
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Model
1
Standardize
d
Coefficients
Std. Error
(Constant)
4.184
.362
Gender
-.665
.310
mother_education_l
evel
.049
fathers_education_l
evel
-.078
Beta
Sig.
11.561
.000
-.365
-2.142
.041
.041
.217
1.183
.247
.047
-.304
-1.662
.108
a. Dependent Variable:
overall_satisfaction
From the model summary table we see can conclude that there is positive
correlation between overall satisfaction level and other independent
variables( model summary table-0.465).
From the model summary table we can find that value of R 2=0.216 i.e. 26.1% of
variance can be predicted in the independent variable.
Fom the ANOVA table the significance value is about 0.074(7.4%) which is above the
5% level hence it is statistically insignificant. So we will not reject our null
hypothesis.
Looking at the coefficients table the regression line looks as:overall_satisfaction= 4.184+( -.665)* gender+.049 *mother_education_level+
(-.078)* fathers_education_level
The significance level of overall satisfaction on gender is 4.1% hence it lies inside
the rejection region and hence the hypothesis H1 is rejected.
The significance level of overall satisfaction on mothers education is 24.7% hence it
lies outside the rejection region and hence the hypothesis H2 is not rejected.
The significance level of overall satisfaction on fathers is 10.8% hence it lies
outside the rejection region and hence the hypothesis H2 is not rejected.
Conclusion- we will reject hypothesis H1 and accept the other to hypothesis i.e. H2
and H3, so there exists a relation between overall satisfaction and gender.
Correlations
prenatal_se
overall_satis birth_orde ssion_atten
faction
r
dance
overall_satisfaction
Pearson
Correlation
.090
.269
.619
.130
33
33
33
Pearson
Correlation
.090
.119
Sig. (2-tailed)
.619
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
birth_order
N
prenatal_session_att Pearson
endance
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
.511
33
33
33
.269
.119
.130
.511
33
33
33
We can see that birth order is positively correlated to overall satisfaction level( r
=0.090) although it is a very weak correlation. We will not reject this hypothesis H1
has the significance level is 51.1% which lies outside the rejection region of 5%.
Similarly, the prenatal session attendance is positively correlated( r = 0.269) to the
overall satisfaction level although it is also a weak correlation. We will not reject
this hypothesis H2 as the significance level is 13.0% which lies outside the rejection
region (confidence level 95%).
In the third one there is weak positive correlation (0.119) and the significance level
is 51.1% hence we wont reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion We will not reject the null hypothesis.
From the above table we find that the significance level of gender on overall
satisfaction is 81.6% and it lies outside the rejection region. Hence we wont reject
the hypothesis.
Conclusion-The hypothesis cannot be rejected and hence we can say that there
exists a relation between the gender and overall satisfaction.
Correlations
prenatal_se
mother_edu ssion_atten smoke_whil
cation_level
dance
e_pregnant
mother_education_le Pearson
vel
Correlation
-.038
-.341
.836
.056
32
32
32
-.038
-.103
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
prenatal_session_att Pearson
endance
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
smoke_while_pregna Pearson
nt
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
.836
.569
32
33
33
-.341
-.103
.056
.569
32
33
33
From the above table we find that there is a negatively weak correlation
between mothers education level and prenatal session attendance(-0.038)
and the significance level is 83.6 and hence the hypothesis H1 cannot be
rejected.
From the above table we find that there is a negatively strong correlation
between mothers education level and smoke while pregnant (-0.341) and the
significance level is 5.6 which lies slightly outside the rejection region and
hence the hypothesis cannot be rejected with a significance level of 95%.
The third hypothesis cannot be rejected because it shows a significance level
of 56.9% which lies outside the rejection region and it also shows negative
correlation between them.
Conclusion- None of the hypothesis can be rejected.