You are on page 1of 6

1.

Overall satisfaction on gender, mothers education level and fathers


education level?
H1. There is no relationship between overall satisfaction on gender
H2. There is no relationship between overall satisfaction on mothers
education level
H3. There is no relationship between overall satisfaction on mothers
education level
Variables Entered/Removedb
Variables
Entered

Model
1

Variables
Removed

fathers_edu
cation_level
, gender,
mother_edu
cation_level

Method

. Enter

a. All requested variables


entered.
b. Dependent Variable:
overall_satisfaction
Model Summary
Mode
l

.465a

Std. Error of
Adjusted R
the
R Square
Square
Estimate
.216

.132

.861

a. Predictors: (Constant), fathers_education_level,


gender, mother_education_level

ANOVAb
Sum of
Squares

Model
1

Regressio
n

Mean
Square

Df

5.728

1.909

Residual

20.741

28

.741

Total

26.469

31

Sig.
.074a

2.577

a. Predictors: (Constant), fathers_education_level, gender,


mother_education_level
b. Dependent Variable:
overall_satisfaction

Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Model
1

Standardize
d
Coefficients

Std. Error

(Constant)

4.184

.362

Gender

-.665

.310

mother_education_l
evel

.049

fathers_education_l
evel

-.078

Beta

Sig.

11.561

.000

-.365

-2.142

.041

.041

.217

1.183

.247

.047

-.304

-1.662

.108

a. Dependent Variable:
overall_satisfaction
From the model summary table we see can conclude that there is positive
correlation between overall satisfaction level and other independent
variables( model summary table-0.465).
From the model summary table we can find that value of R 2=0.216 i.e. 26.1% of
variance can be predicted in the independent variable.

Fom the ANOVA table the significance value is about 0.074(7.4%) which is above the
5% level hence it is statistically insignificant. So we will not reject our null
hypothesis.
Looking at the coefficients table the regression line looks as:overall_satisfaction= 4.184+( -.665)* gender+.049 *mother_education_level+
(-.078)* fathers_education_level
The significance level of overall satisfaction on gender is 4.1% hence it lies inside
the rejection region and hence the hypothesis H1 is rejected.
The significance level of overall satisfaction on mothers education is 24.7% hence it
lies outside the rejection region and hence the hypothesis H2 is not rejected.
The significance level of overall satisfaction on fathers is 10.8% hence it lies
outside the rejection region and hence the hypothesis H2 is not rejected.
Conclusion- we will reject hypothesis H1 and accept the other to hypothesis i.e. H2
and H3, so there exists a relation between overall satisfaction and gender.

2. Null hypothesis-There is no correlation between birth order, prenatal


session attendance on overall satisfaction?
H1. There is no correlation between birth order and overall satisfaction.
H2. There is no correlation between prenatal session attendance and overall
satisfaction.
H3. There is no correlation between the birth order and prenatal session
attendance.

Correlations
prenatal_se
overall_satis birth_orde ssion_atten
faction
r
dance
overall_satisfaction

Pearson
Correlation

.090

.269

.619

.130

33

33

33

Pearson
Correlation

.090

.119

Sig. (2-tailed)

.619

Sig. (2-tailed)
N
birth_order

N
prenatal_session_att Pearson
endance
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

.511

33

33

33

.269

.119

.130

.511

33

33

33

We can see that birth order is positively correlated to overall satisfaction level( r
=0.090) although it is a very weak correlation. We will not reject this hypothesis H1
has the significance level is 51.1% which lies outside the rejection region of 5%.
Similarly, the prenatal session attendance is positively correlated( r = 0.269) to the
overall satisfaction level although it is also a weak correlation. We will not reject
this hypothesis H2 as the significance level is 13.0% which lies outside the rejection
region (confidence level 95%).
In the third one there is weak positive correlation (0.119) and the significance level
is 51.1% hence we wont reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion We will not reject the null hypothesis.

3. Null Hypothesis- There is no relation between overall satisfaction and gender

From the above table we find that the significance level of gender on overall
satisfaction is 81.6% and it lies outside the rejection region. Hence we wont reject
the hypothesis.
Conclusion-The hypothesis cannot be rejected and hence we can say that there
exists a relation between the gender and overall satisfaction.

4. Null hypothesis- There is no correlation between the mothers educational


level, prenatal session attendance and smoking while pregnant.
H1. -There is no correlation between mothers educational level and prenatal
session attendance
H2. - There is no correlation between mothers educational level and smoke
while pregnant
H3. - There is no correlation between smoking while pregnant and prenatal
session attendance.

Correlations
prenatal_se
mother_edu ssion_atten smoke_whil
cation_level
dance
e_pregnant
mother_education_le Pearson
vel
Correlation

-.038

-.341

.836

.056

32

32

32

-.038

-.103

Sig. (2-tailed)
N
prenatal_session_att Pearson
endance
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
smoke_while_pregna Pearson
nt
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N

.836

.569

32

33

33

-.341

-.103

.056

.569

32

33

33

From the above table we find that there is a negatively weak correlation
between mothers education level and prenatal session attendance(-0.038)
and the significance level is 83.6 and hence the hypothesis H1 cannot be
rejected.
From the above table we find that there is a negatively strong correlation
between mothers education level and smoke while pregnant (-0.341) and the
significance level is 5.6 which lies slightly outside the rejection region and
hence the hypothesis cannot be rejected with a significance level of 95%.
The third hypothesis cannot be rejected because it shows a significance level
of 56.9% which lies outside the rejection region and it also shows negative
correlation between them.
Conclusion- None of the hypothesis can be rejected.

You might also like