Professional Documents
Culture Documents
23 November 2011
Introduction
The sociocultural perspective points to the importance
of cross-culturally examining family processes such as
stress and adaptation among parents of children with
intellectual disabilities (see Skinner & Weisner 2007; for
a review). According to this perspective, parents construction of their daily experiences takes into account
the ecocultural niche, which is made up of elements such
as the disability policy, culturally prescribed gender
roles, availability of intervention services and social constructions of disability (Gallimore et al. 1989; Skinner &
Weisner 2007). Findings from a number of studies validate this notion of culturally grounded parental experiences. For example, among mothers of children with
intellectual disabilities living in the collectivist Chinese
culture in Hong Kong, a relationship-focused coping
strategy characterized by managing, regulating and preserving relationships during stressful periods (p. 147)
2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
intellectual disability (Srinath et al. 2005). The few published studies on families of children with intellectual
disabilities living in India shed some light on the childrelated, parental, and social factors associated with
parental well-being. For example, Padencheri & Russell
(2002) found that childrens challenging behaviours
were negatively associated with parental well-being. In
a different study by Padencheri & Russell (2004), parents of girls with intellectual disabilities reported higher
level of marital conflicts as compared to parents of boys
with intellectual disabilities.
Meanwhile, some other studies highlight the importance of parents own cognitions for their mental health.
The eight mothers in Raos (2006) study acknowledged
their childrens disability, but they emphasized their
normality as well. In particular, the mothers narratives
constructed childrens normality in terms of fulfilling
family duties, participating in family rituals and demonstrating socially appropriate conduct. By labelling their
childrens impairment as an inconvenience rather than
a disability, the mothers tried to promote societal acceptance and inclusion of their children (Rao 2001). According to another study with 31 parents of children with
intellectual disabilities, caregiver burden was higher
among parents who were rated high on expressed emotion, which is conceptualized as parents tendency to
make critical comments or be overprotective. (Datta et al.
2002). Finally, at the social level, formal social support
emerged as an important explanatory factor in two studies. Both studies found that when parents receive formal
support, they are more likely to adapt to their childs
disability (Narayan et al. 1993; Pal et al. 2002).
Albeit informative, these findings fail to elucidate the
extent of stress encountered by mothers of children with
intellectual disabilities in India. They also do not demonstrate specific pathways through which parental cognitions of childs disability and other relevant factors
(e.g. childs functioning) may be linked to parental
stress. Finally, the previously reviewed studies included
parents of children belonging to a broad age group and
derived findings based on parent reports alone. To
address these shortfalls in the literature, the current
study utilized mixed methods and multiple informants
to examine (i) maternal stress levels and (ii) child characteristics and maternal behaviours that might be linked
to maternal stress among families of 3- to 6-year-old
children with intellectual disabilities in India.
The choice of predictors was theoretically guided by
the double ABCX model (McCubbin & Patterson 1983),
a framework that has been effectively utilized by a body
of recent intellectual disabilities scholarship to gain a
2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 25, 372382
nuanced understanding of maternal stress and adaptation (e.g. Saloviita et al. 2003; Norizan & Shamsuddin
2010). According to the model, parental coping behaviour is a critical factor to link the stressor (e.g. childs
disability or functioning) to the outcome (e.g. parental
stress). Past research has demonstrated across child
diagnostic groups (Down syndrome, autism and Fragile
X) and levels of child functioning that parents who
adopt coping strategies characterized by positively reframing the situation or seeking out social support tend to
report lower stress levels as compared to parents who
deny their childs disability or blame themselves (Abbeduto et al. 2004; Hastings et al. 2005; Glidden et al.
2006; Stoneman & Gavidia-Payne 2006; Dabrowska & Pisula 2010). On the basis of these findings, in the present
study, we included the variables, child adaptive functioning and maternal coping to predict maternal stress.
In addition to generating quantitative information pertaining to factors associated with stress, the study aimed
to identify through qualitative means, the positive and
negative dimensions of parental experiences. This aim is
consistent with the contemporary line of resilience-oriented thinking in the field, which emphasizes the multidimensional nature of parental experiences. Specifically,
the view suggests that although parents of children with
intellectual disabilities report stress, they also derive a
sense of purpose from looking after their child and feel
rewarded when their child shows signs of progress (e.g.
see Hastings & Taunt 2002; for a review; Bostrom et al.
2010). Exploring the positive experiences along with the
stressful aspects of parenting a child with intellectual
disabilities could help to elucidate the unique strengths
of Indian families. In turn, these findings can indicate
ways by which parenting interventions can focus on
struggles encountered by Indian parents and at the
same time draw upon the strengths inherent in the context.
To summarize, the aims of the study were to (i)
gather descriptive information about stress among
mothers of children with intellectual disabilities in
urban India, (ii) identify factors that significantly predict
maternal stress in the Indian context and (iii) generate
qualitative information pertaining to challenges and
strengths encountered by mothers in the sample, in the
context of their childs disability. It was hypothesized
that mothers in a developing country such as India
would report stress levels that are significantly higher
than those reported by mothers of children with intellectual disabilities in developed countries. Second, it was
posited that both child functioning and maternal coping
would be correlated to maternal stress. However, when
simultaneously examined, only maternal coping behaviours would significantly predict maternal stress.
Finally, it was expected that mothers caregiving experiences would be characterized by both positive and negative dimensions.
teacher had a teaching certification and one was working on a bachelors degree in occupational therapy at
the time of data collection. Teachers experience ranged
from less than a year to 18 years in the field and from
less than a year to 12 years at the current organization.
Their average experience was approximately 5 years in
the field of education and 3 years in their current organization.
Participants
Mothers (N = 47) and teachers (N = 29) of 3- to 6-yearold children participated in the study (19% 3-year-olds,
10% 4-year-olds, 17% 5-year-olds and 54% 6-year-olds).
All children (62% boys) had a diagnosis of intellectual
disabilities either based on a clinical assessment by a
clinical psychologist or based on a functional assessment
by the school counsellor. Whereas for some children
(n = 21), the aetiology was unknown, the remaining children had an associated condition such as Down syndrome (n = 2), autism (n = 9), cerebral palsy (n = 10),
epilepsy (n = 2) and syndrome disorders (n = 3). The
children came from families belonging to middle socioeconomic class, and the mean family income reported
for the participants was approximately 187 000 Indian
rupees (approximately $4000). The education level of the
mothers ranged from elementary education to masters
degree: twenty-nine mothers (62%) in the sample had
lower than high school level education, 13 mothers
(28%) had a bachelors degree and five mothers (10%)
had a masters degree. Majority of the mothers (n = 40)
were homemakers. Fourteen children (30%) lived in
nuclear family households, and the remaining 33 children (70%) lived in a joint family setting with the grandparents and or aunt(s), uncle(s) and cousin(s) in the
house. Forty-four children lived with both biological
parents; one mother was widowed, and two mothers
reported that their spouse had abandoned them on
account of the childs disability.
Teachers (N = 22) across seven research sites participated in the study to report on childrens functioning.
The research site co-ordinator nominated the teachers
who worked most closely with the target child either in
an individual or in a group setting. Four teachers had a
masters degree in either psychology or occupational
therapy, 15 teachers (68%) held a bachelors degree and
three teachers had high school education. Out of the 15
teachers with a bachelors degree, five teachers also had
a diploma in special education and three teachers were
working on an additional degree in special education.
Out of the three teachers who had completed only high
school, one had a diploma in special education, another
Procedure
Following a protocol approved by the university Institutional Review Board, the data collection activities were
carried out at seven research sites located in three midto large-sized Indian cities. Data collection was carried
out at centres that provided early intervention services
to children with intellectual disabilities. As per the protocol, a co-ordinator at each research site sent home
informational flyers to families that met the sample
requirements. On the designated day and time, the
mothers interested in participating in the study came to
their childs school and were provided with more information about the research. They were informed that
their participation was voluntary, and the services they
received from their childs school would be unaffected
whether or not they participated in the study. Consent
was also sought from the mothers to collect information
about their child from their childs teacher therapist.
After mothers provided an informed consent to participate in the study, they completed a short demographic questionnaire and Parenting Stress Index-Short
Form (PSI-SF; Abidin 1995); the measures were translated into two Indian languages (Hindi and Gujarati),
back-translated, and pilot tested.
After completing the surveys, the mothers participated in a semi-structured interview modeled on the
Reaction to Diagnosis Interview (RDI; Marvin & Pianta
1996). The researcher carried out the interviews at each
research site, in a designated space that ensured privacy. The interviews were conducted in either Gujarati,
Hindi or English based on participants preference, and
the time for each interview was limited to 1015 min.
Although by the qualitative research standards, these
interviews may be considered short, it seemed unreasonable to make any additional demands on the participants time, considering the multiple domestic and
professional responsibilities they shoulder.
Upon completion of all data collection activities, the
participants were given 200 Indian rupees (approximately
$5) and a toy for their child. After completing data collection activities with mothers, Vineland Adaptive Behav 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 25, 372382
Measures
Child adaptive behaviour
Childrens adaptive functioning was assessed through
teacher reports on the Vineland II. The instrument
assesses childs functioning in four domains: communication, daily living, socialization and motor skills. The
items in each domain are placed in developmental order
and have to be rated on a scale of 02, where 2 is for
behaviour usually or habitually performed, 1 for sometimes or partly performed and 0 for a behaviour never
performed. The overall adaptive behaviour score represents the sum of standard scores from the four domains.
The complete procedure for deriving the standard scores
and information regarding the range of scores representing mild, moderate, severe and profound deficits, can be
found in the Vineland manual (Sparrow et al. 2005).
Adaptive behaviour scores two standard deviations
below the mean score represent significant limitations in
adaptive functioning. In a study with preschoolers in
rehabilitation day-treatment setting, the Vineland Teacher Survey demonstrated sound validity with respect
to Diagnostic Inventory for Screening Children as well
as good reliability with the Vineland Parent Survey
Interview (Voelker et al. 2007). In the present study, the
internal consistency of the overall adaptive behaviour
scale was high (a = 0.90).
Maternal stress
Stress was assessed through mother reports on PSI-SF.
The PSI-SF is made up of 36 items and three subscales
(parental distress, parentchild (pc) dysfunctional interaction and difficult child) with items (e.g. my child
makes more demands on me than most children) that
are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly agree
to strongly disagree. Past studies carried out in a number
of different countries (e.g. China, UK and USA) have
effectively utilized the measure to assess stress among
parents of children with varied aetiological conditions
(autism, Down syndrome) (Tomanik et al. 2004; Hassall
et al. 2005; Mak et al. 2007; Richman et al. 2009). In the
2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 25, 372382
Maternal coping
Mothers participated in a semi-structured interview
modeled on the Reaction to Diagnosis Interview (RDI;
Marvin & Pianta 1996). RDI is a structured interview
consisting of questions to examine parents initial reaction to their childs diagnosis and changes over time, in
parental cognitions regarding their childs disability. To
the extent possible, the wording and sequence of the
questions were maintained, but some questions were
rephrased to make them relevant to the participants. For
example, the question, When did you first realize that
your child had a medical problem? was rephrased to
include childs name and aetiology. If participants
sought clarifications, the questions were further
rephrased, and follow-up questions were asked to clarify participants responses.
Whereas RDI has been used in the previous studies
(e.g. Marvin & Pianta 1996; Rentinck et al. 2009; Schuengel et al. 2009) to classify parents into two categories
resolved to childs diagnosis and unresolved to childs
diagnosis in the present analyses, the audiotaped interview responses were used to rate maternal coping on a
5-point scale. In line with Lazarus & Folkmans (1984)
definition, maternal coping was conceptualized as strategies that mothers utilized to manage the stressors
related to their childs disability. On the basis of past
evidence on caregiver stress and coping among families
of children with disabilities (e.g. Glidden et al. 2006),
maternal responses that suggested constructive helpseeking and positive reframing of the situation were
given a rating of 5 (for example see excerpt 1). Lower
ratings were given when mothers reported wanting to
escape or wish away the stressor(s) (see excerpt 2).
To assign a rating, the coder played the entire interview and made running notes to document the coping
strategies. After listening to the entire interview, the
coder referred to the notes to make a judgement about
the rating. Sometimes, before making a final rating decision, the coder replayed parts of the interview to get a
better understanding of participants coping strategies.
Although the entire interview was played before assigning a rating, maternal coping patterns were most evident from participants responses to questions
pertaining to their feelings at the time of diagnosis and
changes in those feelings over time. Two illustrative
Parental experiences
Utilizing the open and axial coding procedures (Patton
2002) delineated under Strauss & Corbins (1990)
grounded theory approach, the interview responses
were analysed to generate qualitative themes pertaining
to negative and positive caregiving experiences. Each
audio taped interview was played 23 times, and
unique themes were recorded on an easel pad. After
open coding 30 interviews, the themes were examined
and grouped to create a tentative list of final themes.
Approximately 25 and 32 unique themes for positive
and negative caregiving experiences, respectively, were
classified into three main themes: (i) self and child, (b)
family and (c) community. The remaining interviews
were coded to critically examine and expand the list of
themes and subthemes.
Results
The average adaptive composite score for children based
on teacher reports was 45 and fell in the moderate deficits range (Sparrow et al. 2005). According to the ranges
specified in the Vineland II manual (Sparrow et al.
2005), 15 (32%) children were in the severe deficits
group, 21 (45%) children had moderate deficits in adaptive functioning and 11 (23%) had mild deficits in adaptive functioning. The average rating of maternal coping
was 2.96 (SD = 1.26) on a 5-point scale. Ratings indicated that 27% mothers used maladaptive strategies to
cope with their childs disability, whereas 37% mothers
utilized positive coping techniques to deal with their
childs disability; remaining mothers had a median rating.
The mean maternal stress score (M = 104.69,
SD = 22.54) from the current study can be considered
high, and according to the levels defined in the manual,
77% (n = 36) had clinically significant scores (RS > 90).
Furthermore, the first study hypothesis regarding higher
stress among Indian mothers as compared to mothers of
children with intellectual disabilities in developed
nations was tested through t-test comparisons between
PSI-SF scores from the current study and PSI-SF scores
from studies with mothers of children with intellectual
2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 25, 372382
disabilities in developed countries. The results of the ttests indicated that the mean maternal PSI-SF score from
the present study (M = 104.69, SD = 22.54) was significantly higher than PSI-SF scores from studies carried
out with mothers of children with autism in Canada
(M = 95.9, SD = 17.2, t = 2.80, P = 0.006) (Zaidman-Zait
et al. 2010), mothers of children with intellectual disabilities in the United Kingdom (M = 95.4, SD = 20.3,
t = 2.09, P = 0.04) (Hassall et al. 2005) and mothers of
children with Down syndrome in the United States
(M = 68.5, SD = 29.3, t = 5.71, P = 0.0001) (Richman et al.
2009).
Correlational analyses (see Table 1) examining associations between child characteristics (age, gender and
adaptive functioning), maternal coping and maternal
stress yielded significant correlations between all variable pairs with two exceptions; child gender was not
significantly correlated to adaptive functioning and
maternal coping. The t-test findings were consistent;
girls and boys did not differ significantly on teacherreported adaptive functioning, and mothers of girls and
boys did not differ significantly from each other on coping assessed through maternal interview responses.
However, as compared to boys mothers (M = 98.80;
SD = 23.51), girls mothers (M = 114.50; SD = 17.28)
reported a significantly higher level of stress;
t(45) = )2.46, P = 0.01.
The regression analysis was conducted by regressing
the outcome (maternal stress) on the two predictors
child adaptive functioning and maternal coping after
controlling for childs age and gender. Consistent with
Table 1 Child demographic variables, child adaptive
behaviour, maternal coping and maternal stress: correlations
and descriptive statistics (N = 47)
Variables
1. Child age
)0.05
2. Child gender1
3. Child adaptive
)0.33* )0.10
behaviour (T)
4. Maternal coping (I) )0.39**
0.03
0.38*
M
5.10
45.91
2.96
104.69
SD
1.20
14.99
1.26
22.54
Range
36.6
2088
15
a
0.90
0.89
1
Child gender: 0 = male, 1 = female.
T, Teacher reports on Vineland II; I, Interview with mothers; M,
Mother reports on PSI-SF.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Discussion
This is one of the first studies to derive findings pertaining to the stress profile of mothers of young children
with intellectual disabilities living in urban India. The
findings not only indicate a high level of maternal stress
with three-fourths of the mothers at clinically significant level but as hypothesized, the average stress score
from the current study was significantly higher than
maternal stress scores from studies carried out with
families of children with intellectual disabilities in other
countries. Moreover, mothers of girls reported significantly higher stress as compared to mothers of boys.
The study findings indicate also that maternal coping
strategies rather than childrens adaptive functioning
account for the variation in maternal stress levels. This
link confirms past findings about the role of positive
parental coping strategies (e.g. Hastings et al. 2005; Dabrowska & Pisula 2010), while extending the findings to a
new cultural context. It is noteworthy, though, that positive maternal coping behaviour was associated with
lower stress only among mothers of boys.
The variations in parental stress based on childs gender are consistent with Padencheri & Russells (2004)
finding from an Indian study, in which parents of girls
with intellectual disabilities reported higher marital conflict as compared to parents of boys. Notably, such gender differences have not been detected or reported from
previous studies with parents of children with intellectual disabilities in other countries. In the present study,
the possibility of statistical error on account of the small
sample size cannot be discounted. However, an alternate
explanation for the gender difference may be the patriarchal structure of the Indian society (Johri 2010).
Table 2 Summary of simple regression analyses for variables predicting maternal stress (N = 47)
Girls
Boys
Overall sample
Variable
SE B
SE B
SE B
1. Child age
2. Child gender
3. Child adaptive behaviour (T)
4. Maternal coping (I)
R2
F
1.85
0.11
)4.12
0.11
0.50
3.86
0.32
4.94
0.14
0.10
)0.25
4.58
)0.25
)7.58
0.48
7.50**
3.50
0.29
2.81
0.23
)0.16
)0.46**
3.53
18.53
)0.15
)7.07
0.43
7.65***
2.48
5.78
0.21
2.41
0.19
0.39**
)0.10
)0.40**
Table 3 Positive and negative caregiving experiences among parents of children with intellectual disabilities in India
Related to
Positive experiences
Negative experiences
Family
Community
a potential selection bias; families that agreed to participate in the current study perhaps differ significantly on
the assessed variables from the families that did not
respond to the request to participate. A related limitation
is that although the sample was diverse, it represents only
the families that access educational services for their children. According to some estimates, in India, <5% of individuals with disabilities ever attend a school
(Mukhopadhyay & Mani 2002; National Council of Educational Research and Training 2005). It is possible that
the stress profile of families that access educational services is different from those that do not. Future studies
can perhaps include families being served through community-based rehabilitation services, which have a much
wider reach (Sen & Goldbart 2005; Dalal 2006).
Further, inclusion of children from different disability
groups (autism, Down syndrome, cerebral palsy) in the
sample precluded conclusions regarding links between
specific aetiologies and maternal stress. Research in the
United States suggests that compared with other disability groups, mothers of children with autism are at greatest risk for poor mental health (Eisenhower et al. 2005).
In contrast, parents of children with Down syndrome
enjoy the Down syndrome advantage or positive socioemotional well-being stemming perhaps from their childrens easy disposition (see Hodapp 2007; for a review).
Future research in India with specific disability groups
can verify whether these aetiology-specific parental experiences apply to the Indian context. Finally, from the
qualitative research perspective, the interviews in the
present study can be considered rather short and structured. The structure of the interview and its focus on
childs diagnosis may have deprived the mothers of the
opportunity to talk about what is truly significant to
them with regard to their childs disability. It is possible
that the childs diagnosis is not as salient for mothers in
India as it is for parents in the Western countries. However, the diversity of themes suggests that despite this
methodological limitation, insightful information was
garnered, and future research can use these themes to
guide a more in-depth qualitative exploration of parental
experiences in India. Despite limitations, the study makes
an important contribution to extant literature. The use of
multiple informants (mothers and teachers) and multiple
methods (surveys and interview) greatly enhanced the
validity of the findings (i.e. findings are not attributed to
shared method variance). The study findings also provide preliminary validation for the maternal-coping rating system developed and utilized for coding maternal
interviews. In addition, the qualitative findings are rich
and can be used to construct a more comprehensive and
Correspondence
Any correspondence should be directed to Aesha John,
Department of History, Philosophy, and Social Sciences,
Pittsburg State University, 1701 S. Broadway., 323 Russ
Hall, Pittsburg, KS 66762, USA (e-mail: ajohn@pittstate.edu).
References
Abbeduto L., Seltzer M. M., Shattuck P., Krauss M. W., Orsmond G. & Murphy M. M. (2004) Psychological well-being
and coping in mothers of youths with autism, Down syndrome, or fragile X syndrome. American Journal on Mental
Retardation 109, 237254.
Abidin R. R. (1995) Parenting Stress Index, 3rd edn. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., Odessa.
Azar M. & Badr L. K. (2006) The adaptation of mothers of children with intellectual disability in Lebanon. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 17, 375380.
Baker B. L., Blacher J., Crnic K. A. & Edelbrock C. (2002)
Behavior problems and parenting stress in families
of three-year-old children with and without developmental delays. American Journal on Mental Retardation 107, 433
444.
Beck A., Hastings R. P., Daley D. & Stevenson J. (2004) Prosocial behaviour and behaviour problems independently predict maternal stress. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental
Disability 29, 339349.
2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 25, 372382
Bostrom P. K., Broberg M. & Hwang P. (2010) Parents descriptions and experiences of young children recently diagnosed
with intellectual disability. Child Care, Health & Development
36, 93100.
Chang M. & McConkey R. (2008) The perceptions and experiences of Taiwanese parents who have children with an intellectual disability. International Journal of Disability,
Development and Education 55, 2741.
Dabrowska A. & Pisula E. (2010) Parenting stress and coping
styles in mothers and fathers of pre-school children with autism and Down syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability
Research 54, 266280.
Dalal A. K. (2006) Social interventions to moderate discriminatory attitudes: the case of the physically challenged in India.
Psychology, Health & Medicine 11, 374382.
Daley T. C. (2004) From symptom recognition to diagnosis: children with autism in urban India. Social Science & Medicine 58,
13231335.
Datta S. S., Russell P. S. S. & Gopalakrishna S. C. (2002) Burden
among the caregivers of children with intellectual disability:
associations and risk factors. Journal of Learning Disabilities 6,
337350.
Eisenhower A. S., Baker B. L. & Blacher J. (2005) Preschool children with intellectual disability: syndrome specificity, behaviour problems, and maternal well-being. Journal of Intellectual
Disability Research 49, 657671.
Gallimore R., Weisner T. S., Kaufman S. Z. & Bernheimer L. P.
(1989) The social construction of ecocultural niches: family
accommodation of developmentally delayed children. American Journal on Mental Retardation 94, 216230.
Glidden L. M., Billings F. J. & Jobe B. M. (2006) Personality,
coping style and well-being of parents rearing children with
developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability
Research 50, 949962.
Guralnick M. J. (2005) Early intervention for children with intellectual disabilities: current knowledge and future prospects.
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 18, 313
324.
Hassall R., Rose J. & McDonald J. (2005) Parenting stress in
mothers of children with an intellectual disability: the effects
of parental cognitions in relation to child characteristics and
family support. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 49,
405418.
Hastings R. P. & Taunt H. M. (2002) Positive perceptions in
families of children with developmental disabilities. American
Journal on Mental Retardation 107, 116127.
Hastings R. P., Thomas H. & Delwiche N. (2002) Grandparent
support for families of children with Downs syndrome. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 15, 97104.
Hastings R. P., Kovshoff H., Brown T., Ward N. J., Espinosa F.
D. & Remington B. (2005) Coping strategies in mothers and
fathers of preschool and school-age children with autism.
Autism 9, 377391.
Hodapp R. M. (2007) Families of persons with Down syndrome:
new perspectives, findings, and research and service needs.
Skinner D. & Weisner T. S. (2007) Sociocultural studies of families of children with intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 13, 302
312.
Sparrow S., Cicchetti D. & Balla D. (2005) Vineland Adaptive
Behavior Scales II. Survey Forms Manual, 2nd edn. American
Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN.
Srinath S., Girimaji S. C., Gururaj G., Seshadri S., Subbakrishna
D. K., Bhola P. & Kumar N. (2005) Epidemiological study of
child & adolescent psychiatric disorders in urban & rural
areas of Bangalore, India. The Indian Journal of Medical
Research 122, 6779.
Stoneman Z. & Gavidia-Payne S. (2006) Marital adjustment in
families of young children with disabilities: associations with
daily hassles and problem-focused coping. American Journal
On Mental Retardation 111, 114.
Strauss A. & Corbin J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research:
Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications,
Thousand Oaks, CA.
Tarakeshwar N. & Pargament K. I. (2001) Religious coping in
families of children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other
Developmental Disabilities 16, 247260.
Tomanik S., Harris G. E. & Hawkins J. (2004) The relationship
between behaviours exhibited by children with autism and
maternal stress. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 29, 1626.
Voelker S. L., Johnston T. C., Agar C., Gragg M. & Menna R.
(2007) Vineland survey: self-administered checklist format for
teachers of young children in rehabilitation. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 19, 177186.
Wilcox C., Washburn R. & Patel V. (2007) Seeking help for
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in developing countries: a study of parental explanatory models in Goa, India.
Social Science & Medicine 64, 16001610.
Zaidman-Zait A., Mirenda P., Zumbo B. D., Wellington S., Dua
V. & Kalynchuk K. (2010) An item response theory analysis
of the parenting stress index-short form with parents of children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 51, 12691277.
Copyright of Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its
content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's
express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.