Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stadium Negara (National Stadium), 1962 officiated by the third Yang di-Pertuan Pertuan Agong Almarhum Tuanku Syed
Putra Perlis. Source: Arkib Negara (National Archives
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Report
A report should be written documenting the findings of the analysis. You may support the information using photos, sketches and
diagrams as evidence. Cite your references. Avoid plagiarism. The report can be divided into:
Main Paragraph (Individual Components) consisting of Architectural style and construction analysis of the building
Site context analysis
o Building accessibility.
o Relationship of building to surroundings. (Compare the similarities or differences)
o Respond to climate.
Architectural layout of building
o Plan to section or elevation analysis,
o Circulation to use-space
o Organization analysis: symmetry and balance, geometry, hierarchy.
Architecture style analysis
o Explain the specific style adopted and the characteristics of the style. Is it pure modern buildings as in the
west or has local influence? Identify and explain further if it has local influence.
Building construction, structure & materials analysis
o Explain specific materials and construction method used to construct the building. Compare the similarities
or differences with other modern buildings in the west.
Architectural elements / components analysis
o Identify and explain the significant components such as roof, windows, doors, fenestrations, shading,
staircase or other significant elements that can be found in the chosen building. Each building may have
different components. Analyse the significant components and use photos or sketches as evidence.
Conclusion (Group Components)
Students are expected to distribute the main paragraph accordingly and equally among all members. This is to ensure each student have
similar emphasis for individual assessment. Students are also advised to check the flow of the essay together even though they are
individually written.
The length of the overall essay should be around 3000 words. Font type: Calibri, Font size: 12, Spacing: 1.5
Assessments
There are two components of assessments namely:
1) Group Assessment criteria ( 40 % )
Contents of introduction and conclusion
Organization & mechanics
Design, Visual elements & technicalities
2)
Attachment 1:
Print out one marking sheet per student.
All marking sheets are to be included/bounded in the report.
Each building is
described
thoroughly, thus
forming an excellent
flow of the
development of the
chosen building
typology. The
examples were
drawn from a wide
range of samples.
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Fail
There is a fairly
strong reason
behind the choice of
building typology
and students are
aware of its
development and
some of its
significance
Fair justification on
the choice of
building typology
and students have
some ideas on its
development and
significance
Weak justification
on the choice of
building typology
and students are
vaguely aware of its
development and its
significance
No justification on
the choice of
building and
students are not
aware of its
development and
significance
Each building is
described quite
thoroughly forming a
good flow of the
development of the
chosen building
typology. The
examples were
drawn from a fairly
wide range of
examples.
Each building is
described fairly
thoroughly forming
an acceptable flow
of the development
of the chosen
building typology.
The examples were
drawn from a
satisfactorily wide
range of examples.
Minimal descriptions
of the building thus
making it difficult to
see the
development of the
building typology.
Limited choice of
the building
examples.
Basic description of
each of the building
making it impossible
to see the
development of the
building typology.
Very poor choice of
building examples.
Context analysis
Understanding of
how contextual
issues such as the
political, social,
economic, cultural,
architectural trend
etc had contributed
to the development
of the particular
building typology
An excellent
understanding and
analysis of the
contextual issues
and how they have
contributed to the
development of the
building typology
A good
understanding and
analysis of the
contextual issues
and how they have
contributed to the
development of the
building typology
A fair understanding
and analysis of the
contextual issues
and the ability to
relate these issues
to the development
of the building
typology
Poor understanding
of the contextual
issues with
minimum analysis
done on them and
has minimum ability
to relate these
issues to the
development of the
building typology
Very minimal
understanding with
no analysis done on
the contextual
issues and the
inability to relate
these issues to the
development of the
building typology.
Research evidence
attachment of
supporting materials
used for the
research
Strong validity of
reference materials
and there are
evidence of
optimum use of the
reference materials
Strong validity of
reference materials
and there are
evidence of good
use of the reference
materials
Fair validity of
reference materials
and there are
evidence of
satisfactory use of
the reference
materials
Poor reference
materials and
minimum evidence
of the use of the
selected materials
Fairly inaccurate
facts with evidence
of difficulty in
presenting the key
points. Lack of
creativity in the
layout, composition
and use of
illustration. Minimal
teamwork shown.
Comments:
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Final Grade:
Grades
Mark
30%
Name of Lecturer/Tutor:
Signature of Lecturer/Tutor:
Date: