Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Study of the relationship between ergonomic work environment and work outcomes for
employees whose work at AIKOL, IIUM Gombak.
1.0: Introduction
After completing several years of study, surely everyone would expect good prospect
of working experience which include suitable payment, nice working environment,
cooperative office-mate and others. Working as bosses or open own business will not really
influenced by such factors in order to maintain good motivation or productivity but those
factors are crucial for employees or white-collar staff. However, those factors might work
together which mean employees required all factors at the same time but some employees
desire of factors more than another. For instance, some employees might want high payment
or salary and did not care about working environment while there are workers whose seek for
job which have good relationship between office-mate rather than high payment. Hence, it is
important to investigate the relationship between factors influencing employees work
outcomes.
One of the factors that influence employees work outcomes is ergonomics work
environment. Ergonomics, according to Niu (2009) is considered a field that answered the
needs of jobs, systems, products and environments by integrates knowledge from human
science. The author also claimed that the ergonomics aim is to improve the comfort of the
worker as well as his health, safety and efficiency (as cited in Arruda and Gontijo, 2012).
While Dickerson, Brookham and Chopp (2011, p.316) stated ergonomics as a field refers to
rules for work, which in practice means creating workspaces and interfaces that
accommodate humans with a dual purpose; increasing productivity and mitigating the risks of
injury
Although, ergonomics work environment plays vital role in occupational performance
or productivity, there are some issues still arise. According to Mustafa et al.s finding (2009) ,
in many countries including Malaysia, the low level of ergonomics application and general
awareness are still existed. In addition, Annual report from The Department of Occupational
Safety and Health (DOSH) in 2009 also did not provided specific statistics on ergonomic risk
which further supported the previous statement (as cited in Rozlina Md Sirat and Awaluddin
Mohamed Shaharoun, 2011)
been linked to higher job satisfaction, intention to stay and commitment. As cited in Pavee,
2003, according to Vos and van der Voordt (2001, p. 60), the researchers claimed
"Workplace innovation is not equally attractive to, or worthwhile for all professional
groups. For workers who spend much time at the office, especially those whose work
requires a lot of concentration or who carry on a lot of confidential discussions, the
familiar, personal work room is still a valid concept, if in a modern style and with
powerful ICT [Information and Communication Technology]"
Another aspect of ergonomic work environment is work furniture. Many research have
been investigated the impact of this aspect towards employees work outcomes. In term of
impact on physical health, the selection of furniture used in office plays important role. For
instance, table or desk which placed higher than level of elbow will cause pains to workers.
Drew G (2005) claimed that compression of the forearm likely will take place when the
elbows are below the level of the work surface. Anonymous (2002) also highlight the same
issues that most desks or tables are around 29 inches high, which is great for doing paperwork
or writing but it is terrible for typing purpose. The author also mentioned the chair should
have backrest, swivel base and smooth-rolling casters because sitting slumped or awkward
position puts a strain on the back, shoulders and neck. Edward A (2001) described that
backrest of chair with lumbar support to maintain the backs natural S-curve. Therefore,
selecting suitable work furniture helps in preventing pains toward workers.
Other than that, some researchers described that work furniture able to influence the
job performance of employees. Emily C highlighted the study done by May and Schwoerer
that was conducted in a large Midwest meat-packing organization. Based on the study, the
result showed not only a decrease in rates of Cumulative Trauma Disorders but also an
increase in team performance when ergonomic changes like redesigning tool handles and
providing floor mats was prepared for workers. However, Zecevic et al (2000) mentioned that
recent study has found that the introduction of new product designs in the workplace often
result in user productivity because of a steep initial learning curve with the product (As cited
in Dawn, 2005). Dawn (2005) stated some examples of ergonomic interventions that lead to
possible initial decline in productivity such as using a new keyboard tray, ergonomic keyboard
or web based training program as substitutions for the standard issue work surface, keyboard
and in-person instructor training. Hence, the using suitable work furniture somehow give
impact on employees performance.
3
3.0: Objectives
The current study aims :
employees in AIKOL,IIUM.
To relate the impact of workplace environment and employees work outcomes with
the concept of Human Resource Management.
4.0: Results
4.1.
Number of respondents
9
4
1
0
5
9
12
2
Table 1.0: The demographic characteristics of the respondents according to age, gender and
job category.
4.2 The following figures related to the mean value for Work furniture, physical ambience,
physcal health ,job satisfaction, creativity and job performance.
10 11 12 13 14
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
.
Figure 5: The mean value for creativity.
3.9
3.8
3.7
3.6
3.5
3.4
3.3
1
equivalent workers) more than 87 a week or more than 12 deaths every day. (This is a slight
decline from the 4,551, fatal work injuries in 2009) 2. With the establishment of OSHA any
inconvenience or unpleasant thing in the workplace OSHA responsible to ensure safety at
work and a healthful work environment.
Figure 2 shows the graph on the work ambience in the workplace. Question A1 until
A4 about whether the workplace has the right room temperature, atmosphere, lighting
(illumination) or space to move around. This part, the lighting indicates the highest mean
value. This means that the respondents satisfied with the lighting at the workplace. The
lighting of any property can hugely influence personal well-being and health, motivation and
performance. In the workplace lighting has to meet occupational health and safety
requirements. What has to be taken into consideration when it comes to office lighting is not
just the aesthetics of how the lighting is incorporated into the building but the impact it has on
the workers and in turn the business. The first and most obvious reason for high quality
lighting is how light can eliminate workplace trips and falls. The better lit an area is the safer
it is, and if all workers can clearly see any hazards the easier it is for them to avoid them. Any
glare or shadowy areas can cause someone to walk right into a dangerous situation or
avoidable hazard, which can lead to all manner of serious injuries. As well as the obvious
safety issues concerning the lighting systems that you use in your workplace there are other
issues such as productivity and health effects, which can include unnecessary fatigue and
eyestrain3. The second rated for the atmosphere, and then available space to move around and
last was the room temperature which accounted 3.07. This means that it is neutral which was
not too cold and not too hot. However, during working hours the temperature in all indoor
workplaces must be reasonable. However there is no low for minimum or maximum working
temperatures. Therefore employers must stick to health and safety at work including keeping
the temperature at the comfortable level and providing clean and fresh air. Employees should
talk to the employers if the workplace temperature is not comfortable 4. Here, the employee
relation is importance. This is because every individual shares a certain relationship either
between their employers or colleagues at the workplace. A healthy relationship between them
is crucial in order to deliver their best performance. Therefore if any inconvenience relating
situation in the workplace employees responsible to inform to the employers is the employers
does not know about that. Not only regarding this matter like the room temperature besides
other matters that give impact to the performance of the workers. Last but not least are
question for T1 until T4 which is about time in workplace. The highest recorded that the
respondents have enough time to talk to colleagues which accounts 3.71 mean values out of 5.
These mean that the respondents have enough or more time on chit-chatting among them. It
2 http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=19889
3 http://www.safety.com/articles/importance-workplace-lighting
4 https://www.gov.uk/workplace-temperatures
may give positive side to the company like everybody knew the latest news about the
company or it may also give the negative impact which can lead to gossip. A new survey from
marketing group Employment Office, which questioned 330 Australian employees, found
63% said chatter in the workplace had gone too far and negatively impacted on their
productivity even causing other workers to resent them. The problem is so serious that 4% of
respondents said they handled the excessive chit-chat in an angry confrontation, although
most just asked people to stop interrupting them5. Workplace professionals say the onus is on
managers to quickly spot excessive chat when it appears, and before it gets out of hand.
Therefore, employers should always alert and observe their workers. To talk or chit chat is
does not matter, but must have a limit and not an excessive chit-chat that can affect their
performance. Other than that, respondents are neutral for the time between phone calls and
handle a repetitive phone call with 3.42 mean values. The last was 3.28 which about the
breaks time that the company provided. From 1 April 2009, all employees are entitled to paid
rest breaks and unpaid meal breaks under the Employment Relations Act 2000. They are
entitled to one paid 10-minute rest break if their work period is between two and four hours,
one paid 10-minute rest break and one unpaid 30-minute meal break if their work period is
from four to six hours, and two paid 10-minute rest breaks and one unpaid 30-minute meal
break if their work period is from six to eight hours 6. An employer should give an employee
enough breaks to make sure their health and safety isnt at risk if that work is monotonous
for example work on a production line. Therefore, if the employees have a complaint
regarding the breaks hour that the company provided like not enough break hours the
employers should take serious and concern about it like take immediate action. This is
because if the employees do not have enough rest ensures will affect employees performance.
Action that can be applied is like job design. Rearrange the job and the suitable breaks hours
for specific job so that the employees have enough rest and can perform a new task
enthusiastic.
5.2 Physical health, creativity, job satisfaction and performance of the employees
The graph in figure 3 results to physical health condition among the
staffs in Ahmad Ibrahim Kuliyyah of Law (AIKOL). Based on the graph, it
can be seen that the highest mean values is 3.29 out of 5 which is physical
tiredness while, the lowest is 2.14 which is sinus trouble. Physical tiredness
or physical fatigue can be categorized of feeling very tired, weary or
sleepy resulting from insufficient sleep and prolonged mental or physical
work. Most of the respondents agreed that physical tiredness is the most
5 http://www.smartcompany.com.au/leadership/management/33045-your-officechit-chat-is-more-harmful-than-you-think.html#
6 http://www.dol.govt.nz/workplace/knowledgebase/item/1519
9
problems they have in their workplace. Moreover, the effect of fatigue can
be worst for long periods because it can leads to another pains such as
stress, hypertension, headache, sore eyes and so on. Providing safe and
healthful working environment is very important as it having an impact on
work performance. That is the reason why OSHA (Occupation Safety and
Health Academy) was established in every country including Malaysia. It is
because the main function of OSHA is to conduct workplace inspections for
ensuring whether employers meet minimum requirements of the OHS Act,
and providing a safe and healthful workplace.
Next, the graph in figure 4 shows the employees satisfactions of job
performance. According to the respondents, majority of them are agreed
to say that they feel enthusiastic with their works most days. However,
they do not really find real enjoyment in their works instead. This can be
proven through their answers rated, as measured by the mean values of
total respondents who chose neutral or disagree with a statement. The
reason why they do not really find real enjoyment in their works may be is
because of their jobs did not fit well with the interest or preferences
especially most of them are still young. According to researched
study people find their real enjoyment with their jobs as they get older.
Perhaps this is because the older people are; the more likely they are to
have found the right work for them. But still, theres little evidence for this
but I would certainly like to think it was true.
Secondly, they might have a perception of pay fairness. This is one
of the most reasons why most of employees did not really enjoy with their
works. Pay fairness seems very important nowadays because these
problems considering leads to employees change their jobs frequently. To
illustrate, if you perceive that other people doing a similar job get paid
about the same as you then you are more likely to be satisfied with your
job than if you think they are getting more than you. As a result, they
become dissatisfying, lack of motivation and less enjoyment doing their
jobs. Based on the finding, job satisfaction is crucial not just because it
boosts work performance but also because it increases our quality of life.
10
11
6.0 Conclusion
As mentioned earlier in the introduction, the purpose of this study was to educate
students on the importance of ergonomic work environment for employees and their work
outcomes. The study has shown that the physical work ambience and the work furniture
accounted for the staffs in Ahmad Ibrahim Kuliyyah of Law (AIKOL) are natural which all
recorded more or less about 3.00 out of 5.00 mean value which was neutral.
The impact of the pains or physical health was also more or less the same for all
estimated with 3.00 mean value which the same like the result for work furniture and work
ambience. However the most physical pains that the employees always face are physical
tiredness. This may be because the breaks hour given are not enough that is the reason why
the respondents feel tired and not enthusiastic or eager to perform the job. However the result
was neutral not to bad or too low that still can be control by the employees. They also can
come up with creative solution to problem. This is good because the employees use their
critical thinking to decide to the best of the company and without need to always depending
on the employers.
Result shows that there was a positive relationship between ergonomic environment
and the employees work outcomes. Based on the results, it can be clearly seen that in
12
Kuliyyah of Law have neutral ergonomic environment about 3.00 mean value and the
outcome also neural with more or less neutral. Therefore, if the ergonomic work environments
for employees are really bad or worst it would totally give negative impact on their work
outcome.
One of the limitations of this research is that these findings only true for Kuliyyah of
Laws and cannot be generalized to others kulliyah in International Islamic University
Malaysia (IIUM). Besides that, the sample size is small which only about 14 staffs.
Since the study had only focused on kuliyyah of Laws, it is recommended that the
same study need to be conducted among employees in others kulliyah to see whether there are
any similarities in the findings.
ii)
chat-is-more-harmful-than-you-think.html#
http://www.dol.govt.nz/workplace/knowledgebase/item/1519
http://www.osha.go.tz/index.php/about-osha/functions-of-osha
http://www.creativityatwork.com/2014/02/17/what-is-creativity/
Academic journals:
Anonymous (2002). How to Prevent Computer Pain. Retrieved August 2, 2014 from ProQuest
Education Journals.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/214613633/fulltextPDF/C59FC911C89B44C9PQ/18?
accountid=44024
13
August
2,
2014
from
Academic
Search
Premier.
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?sid=b32f79e7-e6ec-444a-8fdb1c94660222a5%40sessionmgr115&vid=0&hid=110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ
%3d%3d#db=aph&AN=67511445
Drew G (2005). Office Ergonomics: Lets Get Practical. Retrieved August 2, 2014 from
ProQuest Health and Medical Complete.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/213684649/fulltextPDF/C59FC911C89B44C9PQ/12?
accountid=44024
Edward A (2001). Ergonomic Seating. Retrieved August 2, 2014 from ProQuest Education
Journals.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/210215963/fulltextPDF/C59FC911C89B44C9PQ/19?
accountid=44024
Emily C (1999). Effects of an Ergonomic Intervention on Psychosocial Outcomes. Retrieved
August 2, 2014 from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/304590160/fulltextPDF/5075CB8CE71146FAPQ/14?
accountid=44024
14
Pavee (2003). Relationships among Creative Style Preference, Job Satisfaction, and Work
Environment. Retrieved August 2,2014 from ProQuest Health and Medical Complete.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/305214805/fulltextPDF/D9A5F0A1E4C64DCEPQ/1?
accountid=44024
Rozlina Md Sirat and Awaluddin Mohamed Shaharoun (2011). The Influence of Ergonomics
On Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Legislation in Malaysia. Retrieved August 2,2014.
www.iieom.org/ieom2011/pdfs/IEOM129.pdf
15