Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nguyn Vn Hn
K135520103237
Problem 112
For the angular-contact 02-series ball bearing as described, the rating life
multiple is:
xD =
L D 60 LD n D 60 ( 40000 ) 520
=
=
=1248
LR
L10
106
1
3
1248
[ ( )]
1
0.02+(4.4590.02) ln
0.9
1
1.483
C10=55.9 kN
Equation 11-18:
{[
4.52 3
1248(
) 0.02
55.9
R=exp
4.439
]}
1.483
=0.945
Problem 113:
For the straight-roller 03-series bearing selection, xD = 1248 rating lives
from Prob. 11-2 solution.
F D =1.4 ( 2235 )=3129 lbf =13.92 kN
C10=13.92
1248
1
3
10
) =118 kN
C10
= 123 kN.
{[
13.92 103
1248(
) 0.02
123
R=exp
4.4590.02
]}
1.483
=0.917
Problem 114:
The combined reliability of the two bearings selected in Probs. 11-2 and
11-3 is
R=( 0.945 )( 0.917 )=0.867
We can choose a reliability goal of
the selections, find the existing reliabilities, multiply them together, and
observe that the reliability goal is exceeded due to the roundup of
capacity upon table entry. Another possibility is to use the reliability of one
bearing, say R1 . Then set the reliability goal of the second as
R 1=
0.90
R2
1
3
1248
[ ( )]
1
0.02+ 4.439 ln
0.95
1
1.438
=12822lbf =57.1 kN
{[
4.52 3
1248(
) 0.02
63.7
R A =exp
4.439
]}
1.483
=0.962
C10
= 63.7 kN.
C10=13.92
1
3
1248
[ ( )]
1
0.02+ 4.439 ln
0.95
1
1.438
=136.5 kN
{[
13.92 103
1248(
) 0.02
138
RB =exp
4.439
C10
= 138 kN.
]}
1.483
= 0.953
L D 60 LD n D 60 ( 8000 ) 950
=
=
=456
LR
L10
106
C10=20
3
10
456
[ ( )]
0.02+ 4.439 ln
1
0.95
1
1.438
=145 kN
Problem 118:
a)
Equation 11-3:
1
C10=F D
b)
9 1
LD a
10 3
=2
=20 kN
6
LR
10
( ) ( )
Equation 11-3:
C10=F D
c)
LD n D 60 a
8000(350)(60) 13
=800
4414 lbf
6
LR
10
L D 10400(400)(60)
=
=249.6
6
LR
10
Eq. (11-6):
C10= (1 )( 650 )
d)
1
3
249.6
[ ( )]
1
0.02+ 4.439 ln
0.95
1
1.438
=4800 lbf
L D 20000(200)(60)
=
=240
LR
106
Eq. (11-6):
C10= (1 )( 11 )
1
3
240
[ ( )]
0.02+ 4.439 ln
1
0.99
1
1.438
=113 kips
Problem 1120:
Fa =3 kN , Fr =7 kN , n D =500 rev/min , V =1.2
From Table 11-2, with a 65mm bore,
Fa 3
= =0.088
C o 34
C o=34.0 kN
X 2=0.56Y 2 =1.53
=>using Fe
(b) Use Eq. (11-7) to determine the necessary rated load the
bearing should have to carry the equivalent radial load for the
desired life and reliability. Use the Weibull parameters for
Manufacturer 2 on p. 608.
L
10000(500)(60)
xD= D =
=300
LR
106
Equation 11-7:
C10=af F D
xD
1
x o +(x o )(1R D ) b
C10=1 ( 9.29 )
1
a
300
0.02+ ( 4.4590.02 ) (10.95 )
1
1.483
1
3
=73.4 kN
From Table 11-2, the 65 mm bearing is rated for 55.9 kN, which is less
than the necessary rating to meet the specifications. This bearing should
not be expected to meet the load, life, and reliability goals.
Problem 1121:
a)
Fa =2 kN , F r =5 kN , n D=400
rev
,V =1
min
C10=19.5 kN ,C 0=10.0 kN
Fa 2
= =0.2
C 0 10
From Table 11-1, 0.34 e 0.38
Fa
2
=
=0.4
V F r (1 )( 5 )
X 2=0.56
and
Y 2=1.27
Fa
=0.2 , we
C0
Eq. (11-9):
Fe > F r
so use
Fe
b)
Solving Eq. (11-7) for
C 10
xD =
af FD
19.5
( 1 ) (5.34 )
xD
) [ x + (x ) (1R ) ]
0
1
b
10.66
xD =
L D LD n D (60)
=
6
LR
10
Problem 1140:
FrA
= 560 lbf
FrB
= 1095 lbf
Fae
= 200 lbf
10 6
90
L
40000 ( 400 ) 60
xD= D =
LR
R= 0.9=0.949
Eq. (11-15):
FiA =
0.47 F rA 0.47(560)
=
=175.5 lbf
KA
1.5
FiB=
FiA ? F iB ( F iB + F ae )
1
1.483
175.5 lbf
We will size bearing Bfirst since its induced load will affect bearing A, but
is not itself affected by the induced load from bearing A[see Eq. (11-16)].
From Eq. (11-16b),
FeB =
Eq. (11-7):
1
1.5
10.949
10.67
=3607 lbf
3
10
4.48()
F RB=1.4 ( 1095 )
Select cone 32305, cup 32305, with 0.9843 inbore, and rated at 3910 lbf
with K= 1.95. With bearing B selected, we re-evaluate the induced load
from bearing Busing the actual value for K.
Eq. (11-15):
FiB=
Find the equivalent radial load for bearing Afrom Eq. (11-16), which still
applies.
Eq. (11-16a):
FeA =0.4 FrA + K A (F iB + F ae )
FeA =0.4 560 1.5263.9 200 920 lbf
FeA > F rA
1
10.949 1.5
10.67
=3030lbf
3
10
4.48()
F RA =1.4 ( 920 )
Tentatively select cone M86643, cup M86610, with 1 in bore, and rated at
3250 lbf with K= 1.07. Iterating with the new value for K, we get FeA = 702
lbf and FrA= 2312 lbf. By using a bearing with a lower K, the rated load
decreased significantly, providing a higher than requested reliability.
FiA =
0.47 F rA 0.47(875)
=
=274 lbf
KA
1.5
Eq. (11-15):
FiB=
F RB=a f F D
[ ]
LD
LR
3
10
=1 ( 625 )
90 000 ( 150 )( 60 )
90 ( 106 )
3
10
=1208 lbf
Select cone 07100, cup 07196, with 1 in bore, and rated at 1570 lbf with
K=1.45
With bearing B selected, we reevaluate the induced load from bearing B
using the actual value for K
Eq. (11-15):
FiB=
Find the equivalent radial load for bearing A from Eq.(11-16), which still
applies.
Eq. (11-16a):
FeA =0.4 FrA + K A ( FiB + F ae ) =0.4 ( 875 ) +1.5 ( 203+250 ) =1030lbf
FeA > F rA
Eq. (11-3):
F RA=af F D
[ ]
LD
LR
3
10
90 000 (150 )( 60 )
=1 ( 1030 )
90 ( 106 )
3
10
=1990 lbf
Any of the bearing with 1-1/8 in bore are more than adequate. Select cone
15590, cup 15520, rated at 2480 lbf with K=1.69. Iterating with the new
value for K, we get FeA =1120 lbf and FrA =2160 lbf . The selected bearing
is still adequate